{"id":64,"date":"2020-09-03T09:10:14","date_gmt":"2020-09-03T13:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/hrmcanadian\/chapter\/6-2-developing-a-compensation-package-2\/"},"modified":"2020-10-23T14:30:59","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T18:30:59","slug":"6-2-developing-a-compensation-package-2","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/hrmcanadian\/chapter\/6-2-developing-a-compensation-package-2\/","title":{"raw":"6.2 Developing a Compensation Package","rendered":"6.2 Developing a Compensation Package"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Be able to explain the internal and external considerations of compensation package development.<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Know how to develop a compensation philosophy.<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Be able to explain the goals of a compensation plan.<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. Explain types of job evaluation systems and their uses.<\/li>\r\n \t
  5. Be able to define and discuss the types of pay systems and factors determining the type of pay system used.<\/li>\r\n \t
  6. Know the laws relating to compensation.<\/li>\r\n \t
  7. Explain the various types of benefits that can be offered to employees.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    There are a few basic aspects of compensation packages we should discuss before moving into the specific aspects of compensation. These foundations can assist in the development of a compensation strategy that meets the goals of your organization and is in line with your strategic plan.<\/p>\r\n

    Before beginning to work on your compensation packages, some analysis should be done to determine your organization\u2019s philosophy in regard to compensation. Before developing your compensation philosophies, there are some basic questions to address on your current compensation packages.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

      \r\n \t
    1. From the employee\u2019s perspective, what is a fair wage?<\/li>\r\n \t
    2. Are wages too high to achieve financial health in your organization?<\/li>\r\n \t
    3. Do managers and employees know and buy-into your compensation philosophy?<\/li>\r\n \t
    4. Does the pay scale reflect the importance of various job titles within the organization?<\/li>\r\n \t
    5. Is your compensation good enough to retain employees?<\/li>\r\n \t
    6. Are you abiding by the laws with your compensation package?<\/li>\r\n \t
    7. Is your compensation philosophy keeping in line with labour market changes, industry changes, and organizational changes?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n

      Once these basic questions are addressed, we can see where we might have \u201choles\u201d in our compensation package and begin to develop new philosophies in line with our strategic plan, which benefits the organization. Some possible compensation policies might include the following:<\/p>\r\n\r\n

        \r\n \t
      1. Are salaries higher or lower depending on the location of the business? When looking at what to pay in a given country or area of a province different facets come into play...these could include cost of living in the area and fewer qualified people in a given area.<\/li>\r\n \t
      2. Are salaries lower or higher than the average in your region or area? If the salary is lower, what other benefits will the employee receive to make up for this difference? For example, wages might not be as high, but offering flextime or free day care might offset the lower salary.<\/li>\r\n \t
      3. Should there be a specific pay scale for each position in the organization, or should salaries be negotiated on an individual basis? If there is no set pay scale, how can you ensure individual salary offers are fair and nondiscriminatory?<\/li>\r\n \t
      4. What balance of salary and other rewards, such as bonuses, should be part of your compensation package? For example, some organizations prefer to offer a lower salary, but through bonuses and profit sharing, the employee has the potential to earn more.<\/li>\r\n \t
      5. When giving raises, will the employee\u2019s tenure be a factor, or will pay increases be merit based only, or a combination of both?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n

        Let\u2019s discuss some internal and external factors in determining compensation in more detail.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

        \r\n

        Internal and External Pay Factors<\/h2>\r\n

        One major internal factor is the compensation strategy the company has decided to use. Sixty-two percent of organizations have a written, documented compensation policy (Scott, 2011).<\/p>\r\n

        Some organizations choose a market compensation policy, market plus, or market minus philosophy. A market compensation policy<\/a><\/span> is to pay the going rate for a particular job, within a particular market based on research and salary studies. The organization that uses a market plus philosophy will determine the going rate and add a percentage to that rate, such as 5 percent. So if a particular job category median pays $57,000, the organization with a market plus of 5 percent philosophy will pay $59,850. A market minus philosophy pays a particular percentage less than the market; so in our example, if a company pays 5 percent less, the same job would pay $54,150.<\/p>\r\n

        An example of an organization with a market plus philosophy<\/a><\/span> is Cisco Systems, listed as one of the top-paying companies on Fortune<\/em>\u2019s annual list. For example, they pay $131,716 for software engineers, while at Yahoo! software engineers are paid an average of $101,669, using a market philosophy. The pay at Cisco reflects its compensation philosophy and objectives:<\/p>\r\n\r\nCisco operates in the extremely competitive and rapidly changing high-technology industry. The Board's Compensation Committee believes that the compensation programs for the executive officers should be designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives responsible for the success of Cisco and should be determined within a framework based on the achievement of designated financial targets, individual contribution, customer satisfaction, and financial performance relative to that of Cisco's competitors. Within this overall philosophy, the Compensation Committee's objectives are to do the following:<\/span>\r\n\r\nOffer a total compensation program that is flexible and takes into consideration the compensation practices of a group of specifically identified peer companies and other selected companies with which Cisco competes for executive talent.\r\nProvide annual variable cash incentive awards that take into account Cisco's overall financial performance in terms of designated corporate objectives, as well as individual contributions and a measure of customer satisfaction.\r\nAlign the financial interests of executive officers with those of shareholders by providing appropriate long-term, equity-based incentives.\r\n

        An example of an organization with a market minus philosophy<\/a><\/span> is Whole Foods. The executive compensation for Whole Foods is a maximum of nineteen times the average store worker (or $608,000), very low by Fortune<\/em> 500 executive pay standards, which average 343 times (Allen, 2011). According to John Mackey, Whole Foods CEO, paying on a market minus philosophy makes good business sense: \u201cFewer things harm an organization\u2019s morale more than great disparities in compensation. When a workplace is perceived as unfair and greedy, it begins to destroy the social fabric of the organization\u201d (Hamner & McNichol, 2011). Another example of an organization with a market minus philosophy is Southwest Airlines. Despite the lower pay (and more hours), the organization boasts just a 1.4 percent turnover rate, which can be attributed not to pay but to the workplace culture and, as a result, loyalty to the company (Eggers, 2011).<\/p>\r\n

        There are many reasons why an organization would choose one philosophy over another. A market minus philosophy may tie into the company\u2019s core values, as in Whole Foods, or it may be because the types of jobs require an unskilled workforce that may be easier and less expensive to replace. A company may use a market plus philosophy because the industry\u2019s cutting-edge nature requires the best and the brightest.<\/p>\r\n

        Other internal pay factors might include the employer\u2019s ability to pay, the type of industry, and the value of the employee and the particular job to the organization. In addition, the presence of a union can lead to mandated pay scales.<\/p>\r\n

        External pay factors can include the current economic state. Unemployment rates are a factor in this assessment. As a result of surplus workers, compensation may be reduced within organizations because of oversupply of workers. Inflation and cost of living in a given area can also determine compensation in a given market.<\/p>\r\n

        Once an organization has looked at the internal and external forces affecting pay, it can begin to develop a pay system within the organization.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

        \r\n

        Key Takeaways<\/h3>\r\n