{"id":1689,"date":"2026-08-20T17:16:52","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T21:16:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=1689"},"modified":"2026-09-03T13:27:15","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T17:27:15","slug":"archaic-homo-test-wip","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/chapter\/archaic-homo-test-wip\/","title":{"raw":"Archaic Homo","rendered":"Archaic Homo"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Peyton Dagg, Bryana Henry, Anoriel Jacques, Saehee Yoon, and Brandon Hawke<\/h6>\r\nLearn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/about-the-authors\/\">authors and editors<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\"> Hess' student contributions<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/versioning-history\/\">versioning history<\/a>.\r\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the main groupings of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as Neanderthals.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how shifting environmental conditions required flexibility of adaptations, both anatomically and behaviourally.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the unique anatomical and cultural characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens, <\/em>including Neanderthals, in contrast to other hominins.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Articulate how Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils fit into evolutionary trends including cranial capacity (brain size) development, cultural innovations, and migration patterns.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the shared traits, regional variations, and local adaptations among Archaic <em>Homo sapiens.<\/em><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Detail the increased complexity and debates surrounding the classification of hominins in light of transitional species, species admixture, etc.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Breaking the Stigma of the \"Caveman\"<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What do you think of when you hear the word \u201ccaveman\u201d? Perhaps you imagine a character from a film such as <em>The Croods<\/em>, <em>Tarzan<\/em>, and <em>Encino Man<\/em> or from the cartoon <em>The Flintstones<\/em>. Maybe you picture the tennis-playing, therapy-going hairy Neanderthals from Geico Insurance commercials. Or perhaps you imagine characters from <em>The Far Side<\/em> or <em>B.C.<\/em> comics. Whichever you picture, the character in your mind is likely stooped over with a heavy brow, tangled long locks and other body hair, and clothed in animal skins, if anything. They might be holding a club with a confused look on their face, standing at the entrance to a cave or dragging an animal carcass to a fire for their next meal (see Figure 12.1). You might have even signed up to take this course because of what you knew\u2014or expected to learn\u2014about \u201ccavemen.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"163\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/cdn.pixabay.com\/photo\/2013\/07\/13\/12\/36\/caveman-159964_1280.png\" alt=\"Free caveman beard man vector\" width=\"163\" height=\"317\" \/> Figure 12.1: Cartoon illustration of a prehistoric \u201ccaveman\u201d, commonly used as a visual representation of early humans in the Stone Age. Credit: <em data-start=\"261\" data-end=\"293\">Caveman, Beard, Man, Primitive<\/em> free to use under the Pixabay <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/license-summary\/\">Content License.<\/a>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">These images have long been the stigma and expectation about our ancestors at the transition to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Tracing back to works as early as Carl Linnaeus, scientists once propagated and advanced this imagery, creating a clear picture in the minds of early scholars that informed the general public, even through today, that Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, \u201ccavemen,\u201d were somehow fundamentally different and much less intelligent than we are now. Unfortunately, this view is overly simplistic, misleading, and incorrect. Understanding what Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were actually like requires a much more complex and nuanced picture, one that comes into sharper focus as continuing research uncovers more about the lives of our not-too-distant (and not-too-different) ancestors.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The first characterizations of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were formed from limited fossil evidence in a time when <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1582\"]ethnocentric[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> and species-centric perspectives (<strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1583\"]anthropocentrism[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>) were more widely accepted and entrenched in both society and science. Today, scientists are working from a more complete fossil record from three continents (Africa, Asia, and Europe), and genetic evidence informs their analyses and conclusions. The existence of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> marks an exciting point in our lineage\u2014a point at which many modern traits had emerged and key refinements were on the horizon. Anatomically, humans today are not that much different from Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2><\/h2>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Changing Environment<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While modern climate change is of critical concern today due to its cause (human activity) and pace (unprecedentedly rapid), the existence of global climate change itself is not a recent phenomenon. The focus of this chapter, the Middle Pleistocene (roughly between 780 kya and 125 kya), is the time period in which Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears in the fossil record\u2014a time that witnessed some of the most drastic climatic changes in human existence. During this time period, there were 15 major and 50 minor glacial events in Europe, alone.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What exactly is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1635\"]glaciation[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>? When scientists talk about glacial events, they are referring to the climate being in an ice age. This means that the ocean levels were much lower than today, because much of the earth\u2019s water was tied up in large glaciers or ice sheets. Additionally, the average temperature would have been much cooler, which would have better supported an Arctic or tundra-adapted plant-and-animal ecosystem in northern latitudes. The most interesting and relevant features of Middle Pleistocene glacial events are the sheer number of them and their repeated bouts: this era alternated between glacial periods and warmer periods, known as<strong> [pb_glossary id=\"1636\"]interglacials[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>. In other words, the planet wasn\u2019t in an ice age the whole time.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">You can see the dramatic and increasing fluctuations in temperature, recorded through <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"906\"]foraminifera[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, in Figure 12.2. The distance between highs and lows demonstrates the severity of temperature shifts. Much as the Richter scale represents more intense earthquakes with more dramatic peaks, so too does this chart, which uses dramatic peaks to demonstrate intense temperature swings.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_346\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1753\"]<img class=\"size-full wp-image-329\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/All_palaeotemps.png\" alt=\"The graph shows changes in Earth\u2019s temperature for the last 540 My.\" width=\"1753\" height=\"565\" \/> Figure 12.2: The Geologic Timescale and corresponding temperature shifts. Wide and rapid shifts took place during the Pleistocene (the second box from the right). More dramatic fluctuations depict greater severity of temperature shift. The Eocene, Pliocene, and Holocene epochs had more stable temperatures. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:All_palaeotemps.png\">All paleotemps<\/a> by Glen Fergus is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods are defined by Earth\u2019s average temperature being lower. Worldwide, temperatures are reduced, with cold areas becoming even colder. Huge portions of the landscape may have become inaccessible during glacial events due to the formation of glaciers and massive ice sheets. In Europe, the Scandinavian continental glacier covered what is today Ireland, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and some of continental Europe. Plant and animal communities shifted to lower latitudes along the periphery of ice sheets. Additionally, some new land was opened during glacials. Evaporation with little runoff reduced sea levels by as much as almost 150 metres, shifting coastlines outward by in some instances as much as almost 100 kilometres. Additionally, land became exposed that connected what were previously unconnected continents such as Africa into Yemen at the Gulf of Aden.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods also affected equatorial regions and other regions that are today thought of as warmer or at least more temperate parts of the globe, including Africa. While these areas were not covered with glaciers, increased global glaciation resulted in lower sea levels and expanded coastlines. Cooler temperatures were accompanied by the drying of the climate, which caused significantly reduced rainfall, increased aridity, and the expansion of deserts. It is an interesting question to consider whether the same plants and animals that lived in these regions prior to the ice ages would be able to survive and thrive in this new climate. Plant and animal communities shifted in response to the changing climate, whenever possible.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Surviving During the Middle Pleistocene<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rather than a single selective force, the Middle Pleistocene was marked by periods of fluctuation, not just cold periods. Interglacials interrupted glaciations, reversing trends in sea level, coastline, temperature, precipitation, and aridity, as well as glacier size and location. Interglacials are marked by increased rainfall and a higher temperature, which causes built-up ice in glaciers to melt. This leads to glacial retreat, which is the shrinking of glaciers and the movement of the glaciers back toward the poles, as we\u2019ve seen in our lifetime. During interglacials, sea levels increase, flooding some previously exposed coastlines and continental connections. In addition, plant and animal communities shift accordingly, often finding more temperate climates to the north and less arid and more humid climates in the tropics (Van Andel and Tzedakis 1996).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientists have found that the Olorgesailie region in southern Kenya was at various times in the Middle Pleistocene a deep lake, a drought-dried lakebed with an area criss-crossed by small streams, and a grassland. While various animal species would have moved in and out of the area as the climate shifted, some animal species went extinct, and new, often related, species took up residence. The trend, scientists noted, was that animals with more specialized features went extinct and animals with more generalized features, such as animals we see today, survived in this changing climatic time period. For example, a zebra with specialized teeth for eating grass was ultimately replaced by a zebra that could eat both grass and other types of vegetation. If this small, localized example shows such a dramatic change in terms of the environment and the plant and animal biocommunities, what would have been the impact on humans?<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is no way humans could have escaped the effects of Middle Pleistocene climate change, no matter what region of the world they were living in. As noted earlier, and as evidenced by what was seen in the other biotic communities, humans would have faced changing food sources as previous sources of food may have gone extinct or moved to a different latitude. Depending on where they were living, fresh water may have been limited. Durial glacials, lower sea levels would have given humans more land to live on, while the interglacials would have reduced the available land through the increase in rainfall and associated sea level rise. Dry land connections between the continents would have made movement from one continent to another by foot easier at times than today, although these passageways were not consistently available through the Middle Pleistocene due to the glacial\/interglacial cycle. Finally, as evidenced by the Olorgesailie region in Kenya, during the Middle Pleistocene animal species that were overly specialized to one particular type of environment were less likely to survive when compared to their more generalized counterparts. Evidence suggests that this same pattern may have held true for Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, in terms of their ability to survive this dramatic period of climate change.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Defining Characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> share our species name but are distinguished by the term \u201cArchaic\u201d as a way of recognizing both the long period of time between their appearance and ours, as well as the way in which human traits have continued to evolve over time\u2014making Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>look slightly different from us today, despite being considered the same species. Living throughout Africa, and the Middle East during the Middle Pleistocene, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are considered, in many ways, transitional between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>(see Figure 12.3). Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> share the defining trait of an increased brain size of at least 1,100 cc and averaging 1,200 cc, although there are significant regional and temporal (time) variations. Because of these variations, scientists disagree on whether these fossils represent a single, variable species or multiple, closely related species (sometimes called <em>Homo antecessor<\/em>,<em> Homo bodoensis, Homo heidelbergensis<\/em>,<em> Homo georgicus<\/em>,<em> Homo neanderthalensis<\/em>, and <em>Homo rhodesiensis<\/em>).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An active area of scholarship in the discipline involves reconciling the diversity of species from this time period and establishing the phylogenetic relationships between them. The term \u201cArchaic <em>Homo sapiens\u201d <\/em>can mean different things to different scholars within the discipline. The intent of this chapter is to provide an understanding of the diversity of this time period and provide data used to make interpretations from among the most likely possibilities. Although we recognize that some anthropologists split many of these fossils into separate species, until the issue is resolved at the discipline level, this chapter will rely on the widely used naming conventions that refer to many fossils from this time period as Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. We will discuss these contemporaneous fossils as a unit<em>, <\/em>with the exception of a particularly unique population living in Europe and West Asia known as the Neanderthals, which we will examine separately.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\"><caption>Figure 12.3: A comparison of Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. This table compares key traits of the crania and postcrania that distinguish these three hominins. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens table (Figure 11.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trait<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Homo <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>erectus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Archaic <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens <\/em><\/strong><strong>(including Neaderthals)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anatomically Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Time<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1.8 mya\u2013200,000 ya<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u201340,000 ya<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">315,000 ya\u2013today<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">900 cc<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc (1,500 cc when including Neanderthals)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,400 cc<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low,<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">angular<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and high, <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1643\"]globular[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Forehead<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal Region<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting nasal bones (bridge of the nose), no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wider nasal aperture and some midfacial prognathism, particularly pronounced among Neanderthals<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Narrower nasal aperture, no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chin<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Facial Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge and large projecting face<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small brow ridge and<strong> [pb_glossary id=\"1642\"]retracted face[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Skull Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nuchal torus, sagittal keel, thick cranial bone<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting occipital bone, often called occipital bun in Neanderthals; intermediate thickness of cranial bone<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small bump on rear of skull, if anything; thin cranial bone<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large teeth, especially front teeth<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth; front teeth still large;<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">retromolar gap in Neanderthals<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smaller teeth<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">More gracile bones of skeleton<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When comparing <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, one can see that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> are intermediate in their physical form. For some features, this follows the trends first seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> with other features having early, less developed forms of traits seen in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. For example, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> trended toward less angular and higher skulls than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em><em>. <\/em>However, the archaic skulls were not as short and globular and had less developed foreheads compared to anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> had smaller brow ridges and a less-projecting face than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and slightly smaller teeth, although incisors and canines were often about as large as those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>. Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>also had a wider <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1638\"]nasal aperture[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or opening for the nose, and a forward-projecting midfacial region, which is later seen more fully developed among Neanderthals and is known as <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1639\"]midfacial prognathism[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>. The occipital bone often projected and the cranial bone was of intermediate thickness, somewhat reduced from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> but not nearly as thin as that of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>The postcrania remained fairly robust. Identifying a set of features that is unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> is a challenging task, due to both individual and geographic variation\u2014these developments were not all present to the same degree in all individuals. Neanderthals are the exception, as they had several unique traits that made them notably different from modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> as well as their closely related Archaic cousins.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"299\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast.\" width=\"299\" height=\"299\" \/> Figure 12.4: \u201cBroken Hill Man,\u201d found at Kabwe in Zambia, shows common traits associated with archaic Homo sapiens in Africa, including a large brain, taller cranium, and Homo erectus-like features such as massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-broken-hill-1-rhodesian-man-BH-004\">Homo heidelbergensis Cranium Broken Hill 1 (Rhodesian Man)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The one thing that is clear about Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is that, despite general features, there is a lot of regional variation, which is first seen in the different <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> specimens across Asia and Africa. While the general features of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, identified earlier, are present in the fossils of this time period, there are significant regional differences. The majority of this regional variation lies in the degree to which fossils have features more closely aligned with <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> or with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"244\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-5.png\" alt=\"Side view of the Dali cranium.\" width=\"244\" height=\"213\" \/> Figure 12.5: Dali cranium, found at Dali, China, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Asia, including large and robust features with heavy brow ridges like Homo erectus and a large cranial capacity intermediate between Homo erectus and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. Credit: Dali skull original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by <a href=\"https:\/\/marynelsonstudio.com\">Mary Nelson<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nTo illustrate this point, we will examine three exemplary specimens, one from each of the three continents on which Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived. First, in Africa, a specimen from Broken Hill is one of several individuals found in the Kabwe lead mine in Zambia. It had a large brain (1,300 cc) and taller cranium as well as many <em>Homo erectus-<\/em>like skull features, including massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones (Figure 12.4). Second, one partial crania from Dali, China, is representative of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>in Asia, with large and robust features with heavy brow ridges, akin to what is seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a large cranial capacity intermediate between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Figure 12.5). Third, an almost-complete skeleton was found in northern Spain at Atapuerca. Atapuerca 5 (Figure 12.6) has thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, and a more rounded cranium than seen previously. Additionally, Atapuerca 5 demonstrates features that foreshadow Neanderthals, including increased midfacial prognathism. After examining some of the fossils such as those from Kabwe, Dali, and Atapuerca, the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is clear: their features place them squarely between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"293\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast with mandible.\" width=\"293\" height=\"293\" \/> Figure 12.6: Atapuerca 5 archaic Homo sapiens, found in northern Spain, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Europe, including a thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, a more rounded cranium, and increased midfacial projection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-atapuerca-5-BH-022\">Homo heidelbergensis Skull Atapuerca 5<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Due to the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, identifying the time period with which they are associated is problematic and complex. Generally, it is agreed that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived between 600,000 and 200,000 years ago, with regional variation and overlap between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> on the early end of the spectrum and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>and Neanderthals on the latter end. The earliest-known Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>fossils tentatively date to about 600,000 years ago in Africa, to around 300,000 years ago in Asia, and to about 350,000 years ago in Europe (and potentially as early as 600,000 years ago). Determining the end point of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also problematic since it largely depends upon when the next subspecies of <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears and the classification of highly intermediate specimens. For example, in Africa, the end of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is met with the appearance of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, while in Europe it is the appearance of Neanderthals that is traditionally seen as marking the transition from other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to remember that this time period is represented by many branching relationships and assuming an evolutionary trajectory that follows a single linear path would not be correct. Even still, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>mark an important chapter in the human lineage, connecting more ancestral forms, such as <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. During this period of climatic transition and fluctuation, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> mirror the challenges of their environments. Showing increasing regional variation due to the need for local adaptation, there is no single archetype for this group; the defining characteristic seems to be variability.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One well-known population of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are the Neanderthals, named after the site where they were first discovered in the Neander Valley, or \u201cthal\u201d in German, located near Dusseldorf, Germany. Popularly known as the stereotypical \u201ccavemen\u201d examined at the outset of this chapter, recent research is upending long-held beliefs about this group of Archaics. Neanderthal behaviour was increasingly complex, far beyond what was exhibited by even other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> discussed throughout this chapter. We implore you to forget the image of the iconic caveman and have an open mind when exploring the fossil evidence of the Neanderthals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to understand why Neanderthals are separated from other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Unlike the rest of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals are easily defined and identified in many ways. Evidence suggests the time period when Neanderthals lived was between 150,000 and 40,000 years ago. There is a clear geographic boundary of where Neanderthals lived: western Europe, the Middle East, and western Asia. No Neanderthal fossils have ever been discovered outside of this area, including Africa. This is a bit curious, as other Archaics seem to have adapted in Africa and then migrated elsewhere, but Neanderthals\u2019 regional association makes sense in light of the environment to which they were best adapted: namely, extreme cold weather. Additionally, Neanderthals have a unique and distinct cluster of physical characteristics. While a few aspects of Neanderthals are shared among some Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as the types of tools, most Neanderthal anatomical and behavioural attributes are unique to them.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals lived during some of the coldest times during the last Ice Age and at far northern latitudes. This means Neanderthals were living very close to the glacial edge, rather than in a more temperate region of the globe like some of their Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> relatives. While able to survive in arctic conditions, most Neanderthal sites dating to the glacial periods were found farther away from the severe cold, in a steppe tundra-like environment, which would have been more hospitable to Neanderthals, and their food sources, both flora and fauna (Ashton 2002; Nicholson 2017; Richter 2006). Their range likely expanded and contracted along with European glacial events, moving into the Middle East during glacial events when Europe became even cooler, and when the animals they hunted would have moved for the same reason. During interglacials, when Europe warmed a bit, Neanderthals and their prey would have been able to move back into Western Europe. Clearly, the true hallmark of Neanderthals is their adaptation to an unstable environment, shifting between warm and cold, as the climate was in constant flux throughout their existence (Adler Et al. 2003; Boettger Et al. 2009).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Many of the Neanderthals\u2019 defining physical features are more extreme and robust versions of traits seen in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, clustered in this single population. Brain size, namely an enlargement of the cranial capacity, is one such trait. The average Neanderthal brain size is around 1,500 cc, and the range for Neanderthal brains can extend to upwards of 1,700 cc. The majority of the increase in the brain occurs in the occipital region, or the back part of the brain, resulting in a skull that has a large cranial capacity with a distinctly long and low shape that is slightly wider than previous forms at the far back of the skull. Modern humans have a brain size comparable to that of Neanderthals; however, our brain expansion occurred in the frontal region of the brain, not the back, as in Neanderthal brains. This difference is also the main reason why Neanderthals lack the vertical forehead that modern humans possess. They simply did not need an enlarged forehead, because their brain expansion occurred in the rear of their brain. Due to cranial expansion, the back of the Neanderthal skull is less angular (as compared to <em>Homo erectus<\/em>), but not as rounded as <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, producing an elongated shape, akin to a football.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another feature that continues the trend noted in previous hominins is the enlargement of the nasal region, or the nose. Neanderthal noses are large and have a wide nasal aperture, which is the opening for the nose. While the nose is only made up of two bones, the nasals, the true size of the nose can be determined by looking at other facial features, including the nasal aperture, and the angle of the nasal and maxillary, or facial bones. In Neanderthals, these indicate a large, forward-projecting nose that appears to be pulled forward away from the rest of the face. This feature is further emphasized by the backward-sloping nature of the cheekbones, or the zygomatic arches. The unique shape and size of the Neanderthal nose is often characterized by the term <em>midfacial prognathism<\/em>\u2014a jutting out of the middle portion of the face, or nose. This is in sharp contrast to the prognathism exhibited by other hominins, who exhibited prognathism, or the jutting out, of their jaws.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The teeth of the Neanderthals follow a similar pattern seen in the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, which is an overall reduction in size, especially as compared to the extremely large teeth seen in the genus <em>Australopithecus<\/em>. However, while the teeth continued to reduce, the jaw size did not keep pace, leaving Neanderthals with an oversized jaw for their teeth, and a gap between their final molar and the end of their jaw. This gap is called a <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1644\"]retromolar gap[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The projecting occipital bone present in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also more prominent in Neanderthals, extending the trend found in Archaics. Among Neanderthals, this projection of bone is easily identified by its bun shape on the back of the skull and is known as an <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1645\"]occipital bun[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>. This projection appears quite similar to a dinner roll in size and shape. Its purpose, if any, remains unknown.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuing the Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>trend, Neanderthal brow ridges are prominent but somewhat smaller in size than those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and earlier Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em>In Neanderthals, the brow ridges are also often slightly less arched than those of other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In addition to extending traits present in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>Neanderthals possess several distinct traits. Neanderthal <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1646\"]infraorbital foramina[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, the holes in the maxillae or cheek bones through which blood vessels pass, are notably enlarged compared to other hominins. The Neanderthal postcrania are also unique in that they demonstrate increased robusticity in terms of the thickness of bones and body proportions that show a barrel-shaped chest and short, stocky limbs, as well as increased musculature. These body portions are seen across the spectrum of Neanderthals\u2014in men, women, and children.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Traditionally, many of the unique traits that Neanderthals possess were seen as adaptations to the extreme cold, dry environments in which they often lived and which exerted strong selective forces. For example, Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules dictate that an increased body mass and short, stocky limbs are common in animals that live in cold conditions. Neanderthals were said to have matched the predictions of Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules perfectly (Churchill 2006). In addition, the Neanderthal skull also exhibits adaptations to the cold. Neanderthals\u2019 large infraorbital foramina allow for larger blood vessels, increasing the volume of blood that is found closest to the skin, which helps to keep the skin warmer. Their enlarged noses resulted in longer nasal passages and mucus membranes that warmed and moistened cold air before it reached the lungs. The Neanderthals\u2019 larger nose has long been thought to have acted as a humidifier, easing physical exertion in their climate, although research on this particular trait continues to be studied and debated (Rae Et al. 2011).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">New research, however, seems to suggest that these unique skeletal adaptations might not have been strict adaptations to cold weather (Evteev Et al. 2017; Pearce Et al. 2013). For example, large brow ridges might have served as a way to shade the face from the sun. The increased occipital portion of the brain, some researchers state, was to support a larger visual system present in Neanderthals. This visual system would have given them increased light sensitivity, which would have been useful in higher latitudes that had dark winters. And, while recent modeling of nostril airflow on reconstructed Neanderthal specimens supports the notion that Neanderthals had extensive mucus membranes inside their noses, the data shows that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are superior to Neanderthals in our ability to use our noses as a way to warm and cool air. However, Neanderthals were able to snort air through their noses better than we can. Why is this important? When combined with the fact that Neanderthals tended to prefer a more temperate, tundra-like environment, and that other physical traits suggest that Neanderthals had huge bodies that needed massive amounts of calories to sustain them, the picture gets clearer. Massive amounts of energy would have been required to power a Neanderthal body, and anything that might have made them more calorically efficient would have been favoured. Efficient breathing, through larger noses into large lungs, meaning deeper breaths, would have been favoured. To further save energy expenditure, body sizes might have been sacrificed as well. These same types of adaptations are similar to ones seen in children today who are born in high altitudes, not cold climates. Figure 12.7 provides a summary of these unique features of the Neanderthal.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\"><caption>Figure 12.7: Neanderthal distinguishing features. This table outlines key features associated with Neanderthals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Neanderthal distinguishing features table (Figure 11.6)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 21pt\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\" colspan=\"2\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Distinct Neanderthal Anatomical Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain Size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,500 cc average<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brow Ridge Size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nose Size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large, with midfacial prognathism<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced, but large jaw size, creating retromolar gap<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital Region<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Enlarged occipital region, occipital bun<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Unique Cranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large infraorbital foramina<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel-shaped chest<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A classic example of a Neanderthal with all of the characteristics mentioned above is the nearly complete La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal, from France. This is a male skeleton, with a brain size of around 1640cc, an extremely large nose and infraorbital foramina, brow ridges that are marked in size, and an overall robust skeleton (Figure 12.8).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"390\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-4.png\" alt=\"A reproduction of a complete Neanderthal skeleton.\" width=\"390\" height=\"689\" \/> Figure 12.8: La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal is representative of many classic Neanderthal features, including a large brain, large nose, large infraorbital foramina, large brow ridges, and robust postcrania. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/neanderthal-skeleton-articulated-SC-019-A\">Neanderthal Skeleton Articulated<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Tool Making and Use<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One key Neanderthal adaptation was their cultural innovations, which are an important way that hominins adapt to their environment. As you recall, <em>Homo erectus<\/em>'s tools, Acheulean handaxes, represented an increase in complexity over Oldowan tools, allowing more efficient removal of meat and possibly calculated scavenging. In contrast, Neanderthal tools mark a significant innovation in tool-making technique and use with [pb_glossary id=\"2528\"]<strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong>[\/pb_glossary] (named after the Le Moustier site in southwest France). These tools were significantly smaller, thinner, and lighter than Acheulean handaxes and formed a true toolkit. The materials used for Mousterian tools were of higher quality, which allowed for both more precise toolmaking and tool reworking when the tools broke or dulled after frequent reuse. The use of higher-quality materials is also indicative of required forethought and planning to acquire them for tool manufacture. It has been suggested that the Neanderthals, unlike <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, saved and reused their tools, rather than making new ones each time a tool was needed.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"290\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-4.png\" alt=\"Large flakes separated from the core.\" width=\"290\" height=\"159\" \/> Figure 12.9: The Levallois technique is used to create Mousterian tools. The multistep process involves preparing the core in a specific way to yield flakes that can be used as tools. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nucl%C3%A9us_Levallois_La-Parrilla.png\">Nucl\u00e9us Levallois La-Parrilla<\/a> by Jos\u00e9-Manuel Benito \u00c1lvarez is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.5\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.5 License<\/a>..[\/caption]\r\n\r\nMousterian tools are constructed in a very unique manner, utilizing the <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"2529\"]Levallois technique[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (Figure 12.9), named after the first finds of tools made with this technique, which were discovered in the Levallois-Perret suburb of Paris, France. The Levallois technique is a multistep process that requires preparing the core, or raw material, in a specific way that will yield flakes that are roughly uniform in dimension. The flakes are then turned into individual tools. The preparation of the core is akin to peeling a potato or carrot with a vegetable peeler\u2014when peeling vegetables, you want to remove the skin in long, regular strokes, so that you are taking off the same amount of the vegetable all the way around. In the same way, the Levallois technique requires removing all edges of the [pb_glossary id=\"2530\"]<strong>cortex<\/strong>[\/pb_glossary], or outside surface of the raw material, in a circle before removing the lid. The flakes, which will eventually be turned into the individual tools, can then be removed from the core. The potential yield of tools from one core would be many, as seen in Figure 12.10, compared to all previous tool-making processes, in which one core yielded a single tool. This manufacturing process might be considered the ultimate zero-waste tool-making technique (Delpiano Et al. 2018).\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"589\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-4.png\" alt=\"Levallois core and flakes that are gray in color and various shapes and sizes.\" width=\"589\" height=\"470\" \/> Figure 12.10: Levallois core and flakes for tool production. Using this technique, one core is used to produce many flakes, each of which can be turned into a tool. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:NHM_-_Levalloiskern.jpg\">NHM - Levalloiskern<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Xenophon\">Wolfgang Sauber<\/a> (user: Xenophon) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is suggested that Neanderthal tools were used for a variety of purposes, including cutting, butchering, woodworking or antler working, and hide working. Additionally, because the Mousterian tools were lighter than previous stone tools, Neanderthals could [pb_glossary id=\"2531\"]<strong>haft<\/strong>[\/pb_glossary], or attach the tool onto a handle, as the stone would not have been too heavy (Degano Et al. 2019). Neanderthals attached small stone blades onto short wood or antler handles to make knives or other small weapons, as well as attached larger blades onto longer shafts to make spears. New research examining tar-covered stones and black lumps at several Neanderthal sites in Europe suggests that Neanderthals may have been making tar by distilling it from birch tree bark, which could have been used to glue the stone tool onto its handle. If Neanderthals were, in fact, manufacturing tar to act as glue, this would predate modern humans in Africa using tree resin or similar adhesives by nearly 100,000 years.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evidence shows that raw materials used by Neanderthals came from distances as far away as 100 km. This could indicate a variety of things regarding Neanderthal behaviour, including a limited trade network with other Neanderthal groups or simply a large area scoured by Neanderthals when collecting raw materials. While research on specific applications continues, it should be clear from this brief discussion that Neanderthal tool manufacturing was much more complex than previous tool-making efforts, requiring technical expertise, patience, and skills beyond toolmaking to carry out.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Hunting and Diet<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">With their more sophisticated suite of tools and robust muscular bodies, Neanderthals were better armed for hunting than previous hominins. The animal remains in Neanderthal sites show that, unlike earlier Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals were very effective hunters who were able to kill their own prey, rather than relying on scavenging. Though more refined than the tools of earlier hominins, the Neanderthal spear was not the kind of weapon that would have been thrown; rather, it would have been used in a jabbing fashion (Churchill 1998; Kortlandt 2002). This may have required Neanderthals to hunt in groups rather than individually and made it necessary to approach their prey quite closely (Gaudzinski-Windheuser Et al. 2018). Remember, the animals living with Neanderthals were very large-bodied due to their adaptations to cold weather; this would have included species of deer, horses, and bovids (relatives of the cow).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Isotopes from Neanderthal bones show that meat was a significant component of their diet, similar to that seen in carnivores like wolves (Bocherens Et al. 1999; Jaouen Et al. 2019; Richards Et al. 2000). In addition to large prey, their diet included ibex, seals, rabbits, and pigeons. Though red meat was a critical component of the Neanderthal diet, evidence shows that at times they also ate limpets, mussels, and pine nuts. Tartar examined from Neanderthal teeth in Iraq and Belgium reveal that they also ate plant material including wheat, barley, date palms, and tubers, first cooking them to make them palatable (Henry Et al. 2010). While Neanderthals\u2019 diet varied according to the specific environment in which they lived, meat comprised up to 80% of their diet (Wi\u1e9ein Et al. 2015).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Caring for the Injured and Sick<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While the close-range style of hunting used by Neanderthals was effective, it also had some major consequences. Many Neanderthal skeletons have been found with significant injuries, which could have caused paralysis or severely limited their mobility. Many of the injuries are to the head, neck, or upper body. Thomas Berger and Erik Trinkaus (1995) conducted a statistical comparative analysis of Neanderthal injuries compared to those recorded in modern-day workers\u2019 compensation reports and found that the closest match was between Neanderthal injuries and those of rodeo workers. Rodeo professionals have a high rate of head and neck injuries that are similar to the Neanderthals\u2019 injuries. What do Neanderthals and rodeo workers have in common? They were both getting very close to large, strong animals, and at times their encounters went awry.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The extensive injuries sustained by Neanderthals are evident in many fossil remains. Shanidar 1 (Figure 12.11), an adult male found at the Shanidar site in northern Iraq and dating to 45,000 ya, has a lifetime of injuries recorded in his bones (Stewart 1977). Shanidar 1 sustained\u2014and healed from\u2014an injury to the face that would have likely caused blindness. His lower right arm was missing and the right humerus shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. This pattern has been interpreted to indicate a substantial injury that required or otherwise resulted in amputation or wasting away of the lower arm. Additionally, Shanidar 1 suffered from bony growths in the inner ear that would have significantly impaired his hearing and severe arthritis in the feet. He also exhibited extensive anterior tooth wear, matching the pattern of wear found among modern populations who use their teeth as a tool. Rather than an anomaly, the type of injuries evident in Shanidar 1 are similar to those found in many other Neanderthal fossils, revealing injuries likely sustained from hunting large mammals as well as demonstrating a long life of physical activity.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal skull.\" width=\"329\" height=\"329\" \/>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"330\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal right and left humerus. The right humerus is withered looking.\" width=\"330\" height=\"330\" \/> Figure 12.11a-b: a. The Shanidar 1 skull shows an injury to the face that would likely have caused blindness. b. The Shanidar 1 right humerus (on the left side of the image) shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/shanidar-1-skull-BH-050\">Homo neanderthalensis Shanidar 1 Skull<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/fossils\/shanidar-1\">Shanidar 1<\/a> by Chip Clark, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian Institution<\/a> [exhibit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\">Human Evolution <\/a>Evidence, Human Fossils, Species, Homo neanderthalensis] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a>[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The pattern of injuries is as significant as the fact that Shanidar 1 and other injured Neanderthals show evidence of having <em>survived<\/em> their severe injuries. One of the earliest-known Neanderthal discoveries\u2014the one on whom misinformed analysis shaped the stereotype of the species for nearly a century\u2014is the La Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal (Trinkaus 1985). The La Chapelle Neanderthal had a damaged eye orbit that likely caused blindness and suffered arthritis of the spine (Dawson and Trinkaus 1997). He had also lost most of his teeth, many of which he had lived without for so long that the mandibular and maxillary bones were partially reabsorbed due to lack of use. The La Chapelle Neanderthal was also thought to be at least in his mid-forties at death, an old age for the rough life of the Late Pleistocene\u2014giving rise to his nickname, \u201cthe Old Man.\u201d To have survived so long with so many injuries that obviously precluded successful large game hunting, he must have been taken care of by others. Such caretaking behaviour is also evident in the survival of other seriously injured Neanderthals, such as Shanidar 1. Long thought to be a hallmark modern human characteristic, taking care of the injured and elderly, for example preparing or pre-chewing food for those without teeth, indicates strong social ties among Neanderthals.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Ritual Life<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Such care practices may have been expressed upon death as well. Nearly complete Neanderthal skeletons are not uncommon in the fossil record, and most are well preserved within apparently deliberate burials that involve deep graves and bodies found in specific, often fetal or <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"2532\"]flexed positions[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (Harrold 1980)<strong>.<\/strong> Discoveries of pollen in a grave at the Shanidar site in the 1960s led scientists to think that perhaps Neanderthals had placed flowering plants in the grave, an indication of ritual ceremony or spirituality so common in modern humans. But more recent investigations have raised some doubt about this conclusion (Pomeroy Et al. 2020). The pollen may have been brought in by burrowing rodents. Claims of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"2533\"]grave goods[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> or other ornamentation in burials are similarly debated, although possible.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some tantalizing evidence for symbolism, and debatably, ritual, is the frequent occurrence of natural pigments, such as <strong>ochre<\/strong> (red) and manganese dioxide (black) in Neanderthal sites that could have been used for art. However, the actual uses of pigments are unclear, as there is very little evidence of art or paintings in Mousterian sites. One exception may be the recent discovery in Spain of a perforated shell that appears to be painted with an orange pigment, which may be evidence of Neanderthal art and jewelry. However, many pigments also have properties that make them good emulsifiers in adhesive (like for attaching a stone tool to a wooden handle) or useful in tanning hides. So the presence of pigment may or may not be associated with symbolic thought; however, it definitely does show a technological sophistication beyond that of earlier Archaic hominins.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\r\n<h2>Dig Deeper: Evidence of Endocannibalism Among the Neanderthals<\/h2>\r\nKrapina, a Neanderthal site in Croatia, has recently sparked new archeological discourse as many investigations upon fossilized remains show evidence of post-mortem modifications and manipulations of limbs and bones through the use of tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). These findings provide compelling evidence of Neanderthals engaging in cannibalism as part of their post-mortem practices. Additionally, these uncovered remains were found to have died of natural causes as opposed to being killed, showing that even the earliest humans may have had some sort of morality or ethics surrounding the cannibalizing of their kin, meaning they were aware of death in a social context as opposed to merely a physical one.\r\n\r\nWhile the original evidence in Krapina was uncovered in 1901, Croatian geologist and paleontologist Dragutin Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s discovery of fragmented and burned human bones (Ullrich, 2005) was not yet confirmed to be linked to endocannibalism until much later. Whereas the discovery of burned bones does not mean they were being prepared for consummation, due to its context among other findings, this information supports the hypothesis that early hominids conducted post-mortem rituals and practices with their dead. Building on Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s research, Herbert Ullrich wrote in <em>Anthropologie<\/em> (2005) that broken bones\u2014resulting from post-mortem bodily manipulations\u2014were \u201cdefleshed in preparation for secondary burial\u201d (2005, 251) and intentionally left outside rock shelters, while selectively chosen bones were seemingly brought inside for use in mortuary practices.\r\n\r\nFor nearly 150 years, since the first Neanderthal skeletal remains were discovered, anthropologists and researchers have continued to debate the cognitive, social, and physical abilities of this species. In 2016, Rougier and colleagues wrote in <em>Scientific Reports<\/em>, furthering the research, presenting 99 new Neanderthal remains found in Goyet, Belgium. Among these remains, similar evidence of human-induced alterations was identified, including signs of butchering, consumption, and the use of bones to modify stone tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). This discovery provides significant support for the presence of cannibalistic behaviour among Northern European Neanderthals, contributing to the growing body of evidence that Neanderthals engaged with death in ways that reflect social awareness, ritual behaviour, and complex cultural practices.\r\n\r\n<strong>Contemporary Cases of Prion Disease Related to Endocannibalism<\/strong>\r\n\r\nThe evidence of endocannibalism does not end with early hominids; with Australian medical anthropologists recording thousands of cannibalism-related prion disease occurrences present in populations up until 2009 (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013). Following a mysterious epidemic of a new form of spongiform encephalopathy\u2013a \u201cprogressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system\u201d (2013, p.29)\u2013anthropological research regarding the the cultural mortuary rites within the Okapa region of Papua New Guinea have linked the newfound disease \u2018Kuru\u2019 to post-mortem consumption of human remains (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013; Collinge Et al., 2006).\r\n\r\nLocal oral histories collected during the first investigations by these researchers in the 1950s traced the earliest cases back to the 1920s, with detailed case histories. Epidemiological data revealed a strong correlation between the spread of Kuru and participation in mortuary feasts, in which the deceased were ritually consumed as part of funerary rites (2006, p. 2070). From 1957 to 2004, over 2,700 cases were reported, with mortality peaking at over 200 deaths annually in the late 1950s (2006, p.2070); however, following the cessation of cannibalism in the easly 1960s due to governmental efforts, natural transmission of the disease has stopped, dropping the death toll dramatically, with the \u201clast three single cases reported in 2005, 2007, and 2009\u201d (Radford &amp; Scragg, p.48).\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Lasting Gift of Neanderthals: Tantalizing New Directions for Resear<\/strong><strong>ch<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Examining the more recent time period in which Neanderthals lived and the extensive excavations completed across Europe allows for a much more complete archaeological record from this time period. Additionally, the increased cultural complexity such as complex tools and ritual behaviours expressed by Neanderthals left a more detailed record than previous hominins. Intentional burials enhanced preservation of the dead and potentially associated ritual behaviours. Such evidence allows for a more complete and nuanced picture of this species.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"424\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-5.png\" alt=\"Museum exhibition of life-sized Neanderthal figure.\" width=\"424\" height=\"469\" \/> Figure 12.12: Artistic reconstruction of Neanderthal at The Natural History Museum in Vienna, Austria. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_neanderthalensis,_The_Natural_History_Museum_Vienna,_20210730_1223_1272.jpg\">Homo neanderthalensis, The Natural History Museum Vienna, 20210730 1223 1272<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Jakubhal\">Jakub Ha\u0142un<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Additional analyses are possible on many Neanderthal finds, due to increased preservation of bone, the amount of specimens that have been uncovered, and the recency in which Neanderthals lived. We should be cautious, however, to consider the potential bias of many Neanderthal sites. Overwhelmingly, Neanderthal skeletons are found complete, with injuries or evidence of disease in caves. Does this mean all Neanderthals lived a tough, disease-wrought life? Probably not. It does, however, indicate that the sick were cared for by others, and that they lived in environments that preserved their bodies incredibly well. These additional studies include the examination of dental calculus and even DNA analysis. While limited, samples of Neanderthal DNA have been successfully extracted and analysed. Research thus far has identified specific genetic markers that show some Neanderthals were light-skinned and probably red-haired with light eyes. Genetic analyses, different from the typical hominin reconstruction done with earlier species, allow scientists to further investigate soft tissue markers of Neanderthals and other more recent hominin species. These studies offer striking conclusions regarding Neanderthal traits, their physical appearance, and their culture, as reflected in these artists\u2019 reconstructions (Figure 12.12).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"258\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo in a blue suit and red tie.\" width=\"258\" height=\"368\" \/> Figure 12.13: Nobel Prize winner (2022) and pioneer in paleogenomic research, Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/2\/26\/Professor_Svante_Paabo_ForMemRS_%28cropped%29.jpg\">Professor Svante Paabo ForMemRS (cropped)<\/a> by Duncan.Hull is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo (Figure 12.13), of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, has been at the forefront of much of this new research, largely in the form of genomic studies (The Nobel Prize 2022). Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 2022, P\u00e4\u00e4bo is known primarily for his work with ancient DNA. He has successfully sequenced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as well as the entire Neanderthal genome from nuclear DNA. His genomic work has led to the realization that Denisovans are genetically distinct from Neanderthals, as well as the recent identification of a Neanderthal father and teenage daughter, which he discovered by looking for unique DNA markers in the fossil record. Additionally, P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s genomic work has provided researchers with additional lines of evidence regarding the connections between hominin fossils (such as Neanderthals) and modern people, their time of divergence, and current genetic overlap. The work of P\u00e4\u00e4bo has even formalized a new field of study within anthropology\u2014paleogenomics. To stay up to date with Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s work, be sure to follow his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">lab\u2019s website<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Communicating through Speech<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To successfully live in groups and to foster cultural innovations, Neanderthals would have required at least a basic form of communication in order to function, possibly using a speech-based communication system. The challenge with this line of research is that speech, of course, is not preserved, so indirect evidence must be used to support this conclusion. It is thought that Neanderthals would have possessed some basic speech, as evidenced from a variety of sources, including throat anatomy and genetic evidence (Lieberman 1971). There is only one bone in the human body that could demonstrate if a hominin was able to speak, or produce clear vocalizations like modern humans, and that is the hyoid, a U-shaped bone that is found in the throat and is associated with the ability to precisely control the vocal cords. Very few hyoid bones have been found in the archaeological record; however, a few have been uncovered in Neanderthal burials. The shape of the Neanderthal hyoid is nearly identical to that of modern humans, pointing to the likelihood that they had the same vocal capabilities as modern humans. In addition, geneticists have uncovered a mutation present in both modern humans and Neanderthals\u2014the FOXP2 gene\u2014that is possibly linked to the ability to speak. However, other scientists argue that we cannot make sweeping conclusions that the FOXP2 gene accounts for speech due to small sample size. Finally, scientists have also pointed to the increasingly complex cultural behaviour of Neanderthals as a sign that symbolic communication, likely through speech, would have been the only way to pass down the skills needed to make, for example, a Levallois blade or to position a body for intentional burial.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Intelligence<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the enduring questions about Neanderthals centres on their intelligence, specifically in comparison to modern humans. Brain volume indicates that Neanderthals certainly had a large brain, but it continues to be debated if Neanderthals were of equal intelligence to modern humans. Remember, creatures with larger body sizes tend to have larger brains; however, scaling of the brain is not always associated with greater intelligence (Alex 2018). Brain volume (cranial capacity), cultural complexity, tool use, and compassion toward their kind all point to an increase in intellect among Neanderthals when compared to previous hominins.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Yet, new research is suggesting additional differences between Neanderthal brains and our own. For example, Euluned Pearce and colleagues (2013), from the University of Oxford, noted the frontal lobes of Neanderthals and modern humans are almost identical. However, Neanderthals had a larger visual cortex\u2014the portion of the brain involved in processing visual information. This would have left Neanderthals with less brain tissue for other functions, including those that would have aided them in dealing with large social groupings, one of the differences that has been suggested to exist between Neanderthals and modern humans. Other differences were found when geneticist John Blangero, from the Texas Biomedical Research Institute, compared data from the Neanderthal genome against data from modern study participants. Blangero and his colleagues (Blangero Et al. 2014) discovered that some Neanderthal brain components were very different, and smaller, than those in the modern sample. Differences were found in areas associated with the processing of information and controlling emotion and motivation, as well as overall brain connectivity. In short, as Blangero stated, \u201cNeanderthals were certainly cognitively adept,\u201d although their specific abilities may have differed from modern humans\u2019 in key areas (qtd. in Wong 2015). This point has been echoed in other recent genetic studies comparing Neanderthal and anatomically modern human brains (el-Showk 2019).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, scientists are fairly certain that Neanderthal brain development after birth was not the same as that of modern humans. After birth, anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>babies go through a critical period of brain expansion and cognitive development. It appears that Neanderthal babies\u2019 brains and bodies did not follow the same developmental pattern (Smith Et al. 2010; Zollikofer and Ponce de Le\u00f3n 2013). Modern humans enjoy an extended period of childhood, which allows children to engage in imaginative play and develop creativity that fosters cognitive skills. Neanderthals had a more limited childhood, with less development of the creative mind that may have affected their species\u2019 success (Nowell 2016).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The exact nature of Neanderthal intelligence remains under investigation, however. Some studies disagree with the idea that Neanderthal intelligence had limitations compared to our own, noting the extensive evidence of Neanderthals having limb asymmetry. Their tools also have wear marks indicating that they were hand-dominant. This is further supported by marks on Neanderthal teeth that demonstrate hand dominance. The Neanderthal \u201cstuff-and-cut method\u201d of eating, noted by David Frayer and colleagues (Frayer Et al. 2012), would have seen Neanderthals hold a piece of meat in their teeth, while pulling it taut with one hand, and then using the other hand, their dominant one, to cut the meat off of the larger slab being held in their teeth. When looking at 17 Neanderthals and their tooth wear, only two do not show markings associated with a right-hand dominant individual eating in this manner. Further, it has been established that favouring the right hand is a key marker between modern humans and chimpanzees, and that handedness also relates to language development, in the form of bilateral brain development. That Neanderthals likely were hand-dominant suggests they had an indicator of bilateral brain development and a precondition for human speech.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Middle Stone Age: Neanderthal Contemporaries in Africa<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals made their home on and adapted to the European and Asian continents, evidence of fossil humans in Africa show they were also adapting to their local environments. These populations in Africa exhibit many more similarities to modern humans than Neanderthals, as well as overall evolutionary success. While the African fossil sample size is smaller and more fragmentary than the number of Neanderthal specimens across Europe and Asia, the African sample is interesting in that it represents a longer time period and larger geographical area. This group of fossils\u2014often represented by the name \u201cMiddle Stone Age,\u201d or MSA\u2014dates to between 300,000 and 30,000 years ago across the entire continent of Africa. As with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, there is much variability seen in this African set of fossils. There are also a few key consistent elements: none of them exhibit Neanderthal skeletal features; instead, they demonstrate features that are increasingly consistent with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Similarities to Neanderthals and MSA contemporaries in Africa are seen, however, in their behavioural adaptations, including stone tools and other cultural elements. The tools associated with the specimens living in Africa during this time period are, like their physical features, varied. In some parts of Africa, namely Northern Africa, stone tools from this time so closely resemble Neanderthal tools that they are classified as Mousterian. In sub-Saharan Africa, the stone tools associated with these specimens are labeled as MSA. Some scholars argue that these could also be a type of Mousterian tools, but they are still typically subdivided based on geographical location.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recall that Mousterian tools were much more advanced than their Acheulean predecessors in terms of how the stone tools were manufactured, the quality of the stones used, and the ultimate use of the tools that were made. In addition, recent evidence suggests that MSA tools may also have been heat treated\u2014to improve the quality of the stone tool produced (Stolarczyk and Schmidt 2018). Evidence for heat treating is seen not only through advanced analysis of the tool itself but also through the residue of fires from this time period. Fire residues show a shift over time from small, short fires fuelled by grasses (probably intended for cooking) to larger, more intensive fires that required the exploitation of dry wood, exactly the type of fire that would have been needed for heat treating stone tools (Esteban Et al. 2018).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other cultural elements seen with MSA specimens include the use of marine (sea-based) resources for their diet (Parkington 2003), manufacture of bone tools, use of adhesive and compound tools (e.g., hafted tools), shell bead production, engraving, use of pigments (such as ochre), and other more advanced tool-making technology (e.g., microlithics). While many of these cultural elements are also seen to a limited extent among Neanderthals, developments at MSA sites appear more complex. This MSA cultural expansion may have been a response to climate change or an increased use of language, complex communication, and\/or symbolic thought. Others have suggested that the MSA cultural expansion was due to the increase of marine resources in their diet, which included more fatty acids that may have aided their cognitive development. Still others have suggested that the increased cultural complexity was due to increased interaction among groups, which spurred competition to innovate. Recent studies suggest that perhaps the best explanation for the marked cultural complexity of MSA cultural artifacts is best explained by the simple fact that they lived in diverse habitats (Kandel Et al. 2015). This would have necessitated a unique set of cultural adaptations for each habitat type (for example, specialized marine tools would have been needed along coastal sites but not at inland locations). Simply put, the most useful adaptation of MSA was their flexibility of behaviour and adaptability to their local environment. As noted previously in this chapter, flexibility of behaviour and physical traits, rather than specialization, seems to be a feature that was favoured in hominin evolution at this time.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Where Did They Go? The End of Neanderthals<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While MSA specimens were increasingly successful and ultimately transitioned into modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record by around 40,000 years ago. What happened to them? We know, based on genetics, that modern humans come largely from the modern people who occupied Africa around 300,000 to 100,000 years ago, at the same time that Neanderthals were living in northern Europe and Asia. As you will learn in Chapter 13, modern humans expanded out of Africa around 150,000 years ago, rapidly entering areas of Europe and Asia inhabited by Neanderthals and other Archaic hominins. Despite intense interest and speculation in fictional works about possible interactions between these two groups, there is very little direct evidence of either peaceful coexistence or aggressive encounters. It is clear, though, that these two closely related hominins shared Europe for thousands of years, and recent DNA evidence suggests that they occasionally interbred (Fu Et al. 2015). Geneticists have found traces of Neanderthal DNA (as much as 1% to 4%) in modern humans of European and Asian descent not present in modern humans from sub-Saharan Africa. This is indicative of limited regional interbreeding with Neanderthals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While some interbreeding likely occurred, as a whole, Neanderthals did not survive. What is the cause for their extinction? This question has fascinated many researchers and several theories have been suggested, including:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">At the time that Neanderthals were disappearing from the fossil record, the climate went through both cooling and warming periods\u2014each of which posed challenges for Neanderthal survival (Defleur and Desclaux 2019; Staubwasser Et al. 2018). It has been argued that as temperatures warmed, large-bodied animals, well adapted to cold weather, moved farther north to find colder environments or faced extinction. A shifting resource base could have been problematic for continued Neanderthal existence, especially as additional humans, in the form of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, began to appear in Europe and compete for a smaller pool of available resources.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the eruption of a European volcano 40,000 years ago could have put a strain on available plant resources (Golovanova Et al. 2010). The eruption would have greatly affected local microclimates, reducing the overall temperature enough to alter the growing season.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Possible differences in cognitive development may have limited Neanderthals in terms of their creative problem solving. As much as they were biologically specialized for their environment, the nature of their intelligence might not have offered them the creative problem-solving skills to innovate ways to adapt their culture when faced with a changing environment (Pearce Et al. 2013).<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">CRISPR gene-editing technology has been used in studies to evaluate potential differences between human and Neanderthal brains, based on differences in the genetic code. Potential differences include a Neanderthal propensity for mutations related to brain development that could account for more rapid brain development, maturation, synapse misfires, and less-orderly neural processes (Mora-Berm\u00fadez Et al. 2022; Trujillo Et al. 2021). Fundamental differences in brain function at the cellular level may account for the differential survival rates of Neanderthal and modern human populations.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">There is evidence that suggests reproduction may have posed challenges for Neanderthals. Childbirth was thought to have been at least as difficult for female Neanderthals as anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Weaver and Hublin 2009). Female Neanderthals may have become sexually mature at an older age, even older than modern humans. This delayed maturation could have kept the Neanderthal population size small. A recent study has further suggested that male Neanderthals might have had a genetic marker on the Y chromosome that could have caused incompatibility between the fetus and mother during gestation; this would have had severe consequences for birth rate and survival (Mendez Et al. 2016). Even a small but continuous decrease in fertility would have been enough to result in the extinction of Neanderthals (Degioanni Et al. 2019).<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">As mentioned above, the end of Neanderthal existence overlaps with modern human expansion into northern Europe and Asia. There is no conclusive direct evidence to indicate that Neanderthals and modern humans lived peacefully side by side, nor that they engaged in warfare, but by studying modern societies and the tendencies of modern humans, it has been suggested that modern humans may not have warmly embraced their close but slightly odd-looking cousins when they first encountered them (Churchill Et al. 2009). Nevertheless, direct competition with modern humans for the same resources may have contributed to the Neanderthals\u2019 decline (Gilpin Et al. 2016); it may also have exposed them to new diseases, brought by modern humans (Houldcroft and Underdown 2016), which further decimated their population. Estimates of energy expenditures suggest Neanderthals had slightly higher caloric needs than modern humans (Venner 2018). When competing for similar resources, the slightly greater efficiency of modern humans might have helped them experience greater success in the face of competition\u2014at a cost to Neanderthals.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the Neanderthal populations were fairly small to begin with (estimated between 5,000 and 70,000 individuals; Bocquet-Appel and Degioanni 2013), one or a combination of these factors could have easily led to their demise. As more research is conducted, we will likely get a better picture of exactly what led to Neanderthal extinction.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/h2>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"353\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-4.png\" alt=\"Small fossilized finger bone sitting atop a chalk outline of hand bones.\" width=\"353\" height=\"235\" \/> Figure 12.14: Reproduction of Denisovan finger bone. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6f\/Denisova_Phalanx_distalis.jpg\">Denisova Phalanx distalis<\/a> (image from Museum of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium) by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals represent one regionally adapted branch of the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>family tree, recent discoveries in Siberia and the Tibetan Plateau surprised paleoanthropologists by revealing yet another population that was contemporary with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals, and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The genetic analysis of a child\u2019s finger bone (Figure 12.14) and an adult upper third molar (Figure 12.15) from Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia by a team including Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo discovered that the mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences reflected distinct genetic differences from all known Archaic populations. Dubbed \u201cDenisovans\u201d after the cave in which the bones were found, this population is more closely related to Neanderthals than modern humans, suggesting the two groups shared an ancestor who split from modern humans first, then the Neanderthal-Denisovan line diverged more recently (Reich Et al. 2010).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"227\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-4-1.png\" alt=\"Molar tooth with wear, large surface area, and large roots.\" width=\"227\" height=\"341\" \/> Figure 12.15: Reproduction of Denisovan molar. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Denisova_Molar.jpg\">Denisova Molar<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans share up to 5% of their DNA with modern Melanesians, aboriginal Australians, and Polynesians, and 0.2% of their DNA with other modern Asian populations and Native Americans. Additional studies have suggested one (Vernot Et al. 2018) or two (Browning Et al. 2018) separate points of time when interbreeding occurred between modern humans and Denisovans.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic analysis reveals that Denisovans (potentially three distinct populations) had adaptations for life at high altitudes that prevented them from developing altitude sickness and hypoxia in extreme environments such as Tibet, where the average annual temperature is close to 0\u2103 and the altitude is more than a kilometre (about 4,000 feet) above sea level. Through protein analysis of a jawbone, one study (Chen Et al. 2019) has placed Denisovans in Tibet as early as 160,000 years ago. Genetic evidence of interbreeding has linked modern Tibetan populations with Denisovans 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, which implies that the unique high-altitude adaptations seen in modern Tibetans may have originated with Denisovans (Huerta-Sanchez Et al. 2014).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other research suggests tantalizing new directions regarding Denisovans. Stone tools similar to those found in Siberia have been uncovered in the Tibetan plateau suggesting a connection between the Denisovan populations in those two areas (Zhang Et al. 2018). The molar of a young girl, possibly Denisovan, has been found in Laos and shows strong similarities to specimens from China (Demeter Et al. 2022). And DNA sequencing from discoveries in the Denisova Cave have yielded a genome that has been interpreted as the first-generation offspring of a Denisovan father and Neanderthal mother (Slon Et al. 2018). While this research is not yet conclusive and is still being interpreted, exciting new possibilities are being revealed. To stay up-to-date with new discoveries, consider following organizations such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian\u2019s Human Origins Program<\/a> on social media.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\r\n<h2>Pleistocene Hominins in East Asia: Homo longi and Yunxian<\/h2>\r\nNew fossil discoveries, along with advanced molecular analysis, are prompting re-evaluations of the complex evolutionary dynamics of non-sapiens Homo in the middle-late Pleistocene.\r\n<h3>Homo longi<\/h3>\r\nThe Harbin cranium, often referred to as Homo longi, represents one of the most remarkable Middle Pleistocene human fossils discovered in East Asia. It is currently carbon-dated at 146 ka, allowing recent scholarship to use the Harbin cranium to argue for a distinct clade of hominins that evolved independently in Eastern Asia, separate from Neanderthals and modern humans (Ni et al., 2021). This clade is argued to include Dali, Jinniushan, Hualongdong, Xiahe, and Harbin, based on phylogenetic analyses using parsimony criteria and Bayesian tip-dating, forming a third East Asian lineage and a sister group to the Homo sapiens lineage.\r\n\r\nThe Harbin cranium exhibits a unique combination of traits, likely representing a species of Homo distinct from other Middle-to-Late Pleistocene taxa, including H. sapiens, H. Neanderthalensis, and H. Heidelbergensis\/H. Rhodesiensis. Its overall size is exceptional, setting it apart from nearly all other known fossils; however, the proportions of the cranial vault align closely with those of other large late archaic Homo species, with an estimated brain volume of approximately 1,420 mL. Despite its considerable breadth, the face is relatively low in height and exhibits a zygomaxillary shape similar to that seen in H. sapiens and H. antecessor, a feature also observed in other Middle Pleistocene Chinese fossils from Dali and Jinniushan. Additionally, the face is attached to the braincase with reduced prognathism, forming a more perpendicular angle as in modern humans, in contrast to the pronounced midfacial prognathism of Neanderthals.\r\n<h3>Yunxian, China: Possible cladistic origins<\/h3>\r\nIn 2025, researchers released findings that expanded the diversity and relationships of Homo lineages in the Pleistocene, based on an analysis of fossils found in 1989\/90. Two skull fossils were found near the Hanjiang River in Hubei province, China, and were named the Yunxian 1 and Yunxian 2 crania\u2014A third cranium has recently been discovered in the same sediment layer as the two previous finds (Tu et al., 2026). The first 2 specimens were in poor condition, fragmented and distorted; however, using recently developed techniques such as high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans, image segmentation, and digital repositioning of fragments, the researchers incorporated elements from the Yunxian 1 crania with the less damaged Yunxian 2 cranium. The Yunxian 2 cranium is a mosaic of primitive and derived traits. It retains ancient characteristics seen in earlier hominins, a thick supraorbital torus, a broad palate, a long and low vault in lateral view, and a receding frontal contour; its frontal lobe remains low and narrow, similar to H. erectus fossils. Conversely, it lacks the strongly angulated occipital bone found in H. erectus as well as the protruding occipital region or central suprainiac fossa typical of Neanderthals. The big surprise is that the zygomaxillary region is transversely flat and faces anteriorly, a feature comparable to the Hualongdong and Harbin fossils and even H. sapiens. This intermediate morphology places Yunxian 2 in a distinct position, linking archaics like H. erectus with later Asian hominins such as Harbin, Dali, and Jinniushan. Phylogenetic and morphometric analyses confirm that Yunxian 2 represents an early member of the Asian H.longi Clade. The reconstructed Yunxian 2 cranium represents a major achievement in paleoanthropology, digitally restoring a badly damaged fossil from beyond the Middle Pleistocene. In fact, recent discussion suggests an even earlier date for the Yunxian fossils at approximately 1.77 Ma (Tu et al., 2026). In their analysis, they identify the Yunxian fossils as H.erectus, and the site as Early Pleistocene. Over 500 artifacts have been recovered from the site (cores, choppers, and flakes) typical of the Early Paleolithic. Nevertheless, the mosaic morphology of the Yunxian skulls reveals characteristics within the range of both H. erectus and the Harbin skull (among others), which may position these finds as being very close to the origins and diversification of the longi clade, as well as preserving transitional features close to the sapiens clade\u00a0 (Feng et al., 2025, p.1323).\r\n\r\nThe expanding fossil and genomic record of Archaic Homo has profoundly reshaped our understanding of Pleistocene human evolution. Discoveries, from an increasing variety of fossils found in eastern Asia, to advances in genomic research, demonstrate that multiple contemporaneous lineages once coexisted, interacted, diverged and, at times, interbred. These findings challenge earlier linear models of human ancestry and instead point to a dynamic evolutionary landscape marked by regional diversification, intermittent contact, and complex patterns of gene flow.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">How Do These Fit In? <em>Homo naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo floresiensis\r\n<\/em><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recently, some fossils have been unearthed that have challenged our understanding of the hominin lineage. The fossils of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are significant for several reasons but are mostly known for how they don\u2019t fit the previously held patterns of hominin evolution. While we examine information about these species, we ask you to consider the evidence presented in this chapter and others to draw your own conclusions regarding the significance and placement of these two unusual fossil species in the hominin lineage.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>naledi<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"347\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-5.png\" alt=\"A nearly complete skeleton surrounded by off-white bone fragments on a black table.\" width=\"347\" height=\"390\" \/> Figure 12.16: A sample of some of the 1,550 bones found representing Homo naledi. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560#fig1\">Dinaledi skeletal specimens (Figure 1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560\">Berger et al. 2015<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 2013 recreational spelunkers uncovered a collection of bones deep in a cave network in Johannesburg, South Africa. The cave system, known as Rising Star, had been well documented by other cavers; however, it appears few people had ever gone as far into the cave as these spelunkers did. Lee Berger, paleoanthropologist at University of Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg, immediately put out a call for what he termed \u201cunderground astronauts\u201d to begin recovery and excavation of the fossil materials. Unlike other excavations, Berger and most other paleoanthropologists would not be able to access the elusive site, as it was incredibly difficult to reach, and at some points there was only eight inches of space through which to navigate. The underground astronauts, all petite women anthropologists, were the only ones who were able to access this remarkable site. Armed with small excavation tools and a video camera, which streamed the footage up to the rest of the team at the surface, the team worked together and uncovered a total of 1,550 bones, representing at least 15 individuals, as seen in Figure 12.16. Later, an additional 131 bones, including an almost-complete cranium, were found in a nearby chamber of the cave, representing three more individuals (Figure 12.17). Berger called in a team of specialists to participate in what was dubbed \u201cPaleoanthropology Summer Camp.\u201d Each researcher specialized in a different portion of the hominin skeleton. With various specialists working simultaneously, more rapid analysis was possible of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> than most fossil discoveries.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"534\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of four different views of the LES1 Homo naledi skull set against a black background.\" width=\"534\" height=\"599\" \/> Figure 12.17: Several angles of the nearly complete LES1 Homo naledi skull. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232#fig5\">LES1 Cranium (Figure 5)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232\">Hawks et al. 2017<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While access to the site, approximately 80 m from any known cave entrance or opening, was treacherous for researchers, it must have been difficult for <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> as well. The route included moving through a portion that is just 25 cm wide at some points, known as \u201cSuperman\u2019s Crawl.\u201d The only way to get through this section is by crawling on your stomach with one arm by your side and the other raised above your head. Past Superman\u2019s Crawl, a jagged wall known as the Dragon\u2019s Back would have been very difficult to traverse. Below that, a narrow vertical chute would have eventually led down to the area where the fossils were discovered. While geology changes over time and the cave system likely has undergone its fair share, it is not likely that these features arose after <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> lived (Dirks Et al. 2017). This has made scientists curious as to how the bones ended up in the bottom of the cave system in the first place. It has been suggested that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> deposited the bones there, one way or another. If <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> did deposit the bones, either through random disposal or intentional burial, this raises questions regarding their symbolic behaviour and other cultural traits, including the use of fire, to access a very dark cave system. Another competing idea is that a few individuals may have entered the cave system to escape a predator and then got stuck. To account for the sheer number of fossils, this would have had to happen multiple times.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The features of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> are well-documented due to the fairly large sample, which represents individuals of all sexes and a wide range of ages. The skull shape and features are very much like other members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>\u2014including a sagittal keel and large brow, like <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a well-developed frontal lobe, similar to modern humans\u2014yet the brain size is significantly smaller than its counterparts, at approximately 500 cc (560 cc for males and 465 cc for females). The teeth also exhibit features of later members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>, such as Neanderthals, including a reduction in overall tooth size. <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> also had unique shoulder anatomy and curved fingers, indicating similarities to tree-dwelling primates, which is very different from any other hominin yet found. Perhaps the greatest shock of all is that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> has been dated to 335,000 to 236,000 years ago, placing it as a contemporary to modern <em>Homo sapiens,<\/em> despite its very primitive features. An additional specimen of a child, found in 2021, not only shares many of the unique features found in the adult specimen but will also add insight into the growth and development of individuals of this species (Brophy Et al. 2021).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>floresiensis<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In a small cave called Liang Bua, on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, a small collection of fossils were discovered beginning in 2003 (Figure 12.18). The fossil fragments represent as many as nine individuals, including a nearly complete female skeleton. The features of the skull are very similar to that of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, including the presence of a sagittal keel, an arching brow ridges and nuchal torus, and the lack of a chin (Figure 12.19). <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>, as the new species is called, had a brain size that was remarkably small at 400 cc, and recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"606\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-3.png\" alt=\"View from inside a large cave with people standing near a dug-out square of dirt.\" width=\"606\" height=\"403\" \/> Figure 12.18: Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, where a collection of Homo floresiensis specimens were discovered. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_floresiensis_cave.jpg\">Homo floresiensis cave<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/84301190@N00\">Rosino<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"584\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-5.png\" alt=\"Photograph of a gray and off-white cast Homo floresiensis skull.\" width=\"584\" height=\"584\" \/> Figure 12.19: Homo floresiensis had a brain that was remarkably small at 400 cc. Recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates Homo erectus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-floresiensis-skull-BH-033-2\">Homo floresiensis Skull (Flores Skull LB1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The complete female skeleton, who was an adult, was approximately a metre tall and would have weighed just under 30 kg, which is significantly shorter and just a few kilograms more than the average, modern, young elementary-aged child. A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> can be seen in Figure 12.20. The small size of the fossil has earned the species the nickname \u201cthe Hobbit.\u201d Many questions have been asked about the stature of this species, as all of the specimens found also show evidence of diminutive stature and small brain size. Some explanations include pathology; however, this seems unlikely as all fossils found thus far demonstrate the same pattern. Another possible explanation lies in a biological phenomena seen in other animal species also found on the island, which date to a similar time period. This phenomenon, called <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"2537\"]insular dwarfing[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, is due to limited food resources on an island, which can create a selective pressure for large-bodied species to be selected for smaller size, as an island would not have been able to support their larger-bodied cousins for a long period of time. This phenomenon is the cause of other unique species known to have lived on the island at the same time, including the miniature stegodon, a dwarf elephant species.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"448\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-4.png\" alt=\"Black-and-white drawing of a large nude woman and a much smaller man.\" width=\"448\" height=\"611\" \/> Figure 12.20: A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis. As an adult, Homo floresiensis was approximately 1 metre tall and would have weighed under 30 kg. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis (Figure 11.19)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is ongoing research and debate regarding <em>Homo floresiensis<\/em>\u2019 dates of existence, with some researchers concluding that they lived on Flores until perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago, although they are more often dated to 100,000 to 60,000 years ago. Stone tools from that time period uncovered at the site are similar to other hominin stone tools found on the island of Flores. <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have hunted a wide range of animals, including the miniature stegodon, giant rats, and other large rodents. Other animals on the island that could have threatened them include the giant komodo dragon. An interesting note about this island chain is that ancestors of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have had to traverse the open ocean in order to get there, as the nearest island is almost 10 km away, and there is little evidence to support that a land bridge connecting mainland Asia or Australia to the island would have been present. This separation from the mainland would also have limited the number of other animals, including predators and human species, that would have had access to the island. Anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> arrived on the island around 30,000 years ago and, if some researchers\u2019 later dates for <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are correct, both species may have lived on Flores at the same time. The modern population living on the island of Flores today believes that their ancestors came from the Liang Bua cave; however, recent genetic studies have determined they are not related to <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> (Tucci Et al. 2018).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2>Cultural Connections and Contemporary Implications<\/h2>\r\nThe Neanderthals provide an important example of how biological and cultural adaptations cannot always be understood separately. Their large brains and robust, cold-adapted bodies came with significant energetic demands, creating biological challenges that could be addressed through cultural practices. Hunting, tool use, food processing, fire, clothing, and shelter were not simply behaviours that existed alongside their biology; they allowed Neanderthals to respond to the environment and the physiological demands placed on their bodies. In this sense, culture became another means through which Neanderthals adapted to their environment.\r\n\r\nTheir social behaviours further complicate the distinction between biological survival and cultural adaptation. Evidence of care for injured or vulnerable individuals and intentional burial suggests that their social lives extended beyond immediate individual survival. These social interactions demonstrate that adaptation was not simply a matter of being biologically suited to an environment, but also involved relationships, shared practices, and forms of social care. Although the meaning of these behaviours cannot be fully reconstructed, they challenge the simplistic image of archaic humans as primitive or solely driven by biological instincts.\r\n\r\nUltimately, Neanderthals demonstrate that human adaptation is neither exclusively biological nor exclusively cultural. Their bodies were shaped by the environments in which they lived, while their cultural practices allowed them to navigate and modify those environments. Looking at Neanderthals through a biocultural perspective therefore moves us beyond the idea of the \u201ccaveman\u201d and instead recognizes them as hominins whose survival emerged through the interaction of physiology, environment, technology, and social life.\r\n<h4>Discussion questions<\/h4>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Why might caring for the sick and injured and practicing burial rites be considered evidence of culture? What do these behaviours reveal about social life?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Can you think of an example of the intertwining of biology and culture in humans today? What does this example reveal about the relationship between biological and cultural adaptation?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summaries<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u2013200,000 years ago (although some regional variation)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Africa, Europe, and Asia<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Broken Hill (Zambia), Atapuerca (Spain)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc average<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth in back of mouth, larger front teeth<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging forehead, no chin, projecting occipital region<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Varied regionally, but some continue to use Acheulean handaxe, others adopt Mousterian tool culture<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lots of regional variation in this species<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">335,000\u2013236,000 years ago<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">South Africa<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rising Star Cave<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">500 cc average<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced tooth size<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, large brow, well-developed frontal region<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Suspensory shoulder<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">150,000\u201340,000 years ago<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Western Europe, Middle East, and Western Asia only<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Shanidar (Iraq), La Chapelle-aux-Saints (France)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1500 cc average<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Retromolar gap<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge, midfacial prognathism, large infraorbital foramina, occipital bun<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton with short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel chest<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mousterian tools often constructed using the Levallois technique<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201360,000 years ago, perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Liang Bua, island of Flores, Indonesia<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cThe Hobbit\u201d<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">400 cc average<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, arching brow ridges, nuchal torus, no chin<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Very short stature (approximately 3.5 ft.)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tools similar to other tools found on the island of Flores<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201330,000 years ago<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Siberia<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Child\u2019s finger bone and adult molar<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large molars (from limited evidence)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Closely related to Neanderthals (genetically)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Research presented in the chapter contributes to why scientists have taken to nicknaming this time period \u201cthe muddle in the middle.\u201d We know that the Middle Pleistocene picks up from <em>Homo erectus <\/em>and ends with the appearance of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. While the start and the end are clear, it\u2019s the middle that is messy. As more research is conducted and more data is collected, rather than clarifying our understanding of the hominin lineage during this time period, it only inspires more questions, particularly about the relationships between hominins during this time period, including the oft-misunderstood Neanderthal. Research is painting a more detailed picture of Neanderthal intelligence and both biological and behavioural adaptations. At the same time, their relationship to other Middle Pleistocene hominins, including Denisovans, as well as modern humans, remains unclear.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo<\/em> <em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are clear outliers when compared to their contemporary hominin species. Each has surprised paleoanthropologists for both their archaic traits in relatively modern times and their unique combination of traits seen in archaic species and modern humans. While these finds have been exciting, they have also completely upended the assumed trajectory of the human lineage, causing scientists to re-examine assumptions about hominin evolution and what it means to be modern. Add this to the developments being made using ancient DNA, other new fossil discoveries, and other innovations in paleoanthropology, and you see that our understanding of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and others living during this time period is rapidly developing and changing. This is a true testament to the nature of science and the scientific method.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clearly, hominins of the Middle Pleistocene are distinct from our species today. Yet, understanding the hominins that directly preceded our species and clarifying the evolutionary relationships between us is important to better understanding our own place in nature.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>What physical and cultural features are unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>? How are Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> different in both physical and cultural characteristics from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Describe the specific changes to the brain and skull first seen in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>. Why does the shape of the skull change so dramatically from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What role did the shifting environment play in the adaptation of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals? Discuss at least one physical feature and one cultural feature that would have assisted these groups in surviving the changing environment.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What does the regional variation in Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> represent in terms of the broader story of our species\u2019 evolution?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Describe the issues raised by the discoveries of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> in the understanding of the story of the evolution of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n\r\n<strong>Allele<\/strong>: Each of two or more alternative forms of a gene that arise by mutation and are found at the same place on a chromosome.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anthropocentrism<\/strong>: A way of thinking that assumes humans are the most important species and leads to interpreting the world always through a human lens. Species-centric science and thought.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cortex<\/strong>: The outside, or rough outer covering, of a rock. Usually the cortex is removed during the process of stone tool creation.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethnocentric<\/strong>: Applying negative judgments to other cultures based on comparison to one\u2019s own.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exogenous DNA<\/strong>: DNA that originates from sources outside of the specimen you are trying to sequence.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Flexed position<\/strong>: Fetal position, in which the legs are drawn up to the middle of the body and the arms are drawn toward the body centre. Intentional burials are often found in the flexed body position.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraminifera<\/strong>: Microscopic single-celled organisms with a shell that are common in all marine environments. The fossil record of foraminifera extends back well over 500 million years.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Glaciation<\/strong>: A glacial period, or time when a large portion of the world is covered by glaciers and ice sheets.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globular<\/strong>: Round-shaped, like a globe.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grave goods<\/strong>: Items included with a body at burial. Items may signify occupation or hobbies, social status, or level of importance in the community, or they may be items believed necessary for the afterlife.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Haft<\/strong>: A handle. Also used as a verb\u2014to attach a handle to an item, such as a stone tool.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Infraorbital foramina<\/strong>: Small holes on the maxilla bone of the face that allows nerves and blood to reach the skin.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insular dwarfing<\/strong>: A form of dwarfism that occurs when a limited geographic region, such as an island, causes a large-bodied animal to be selected for a smaller body size.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interglacial<\/strong>: A warmer period between two glacial time periods.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Levallois technique<\/strong>: A distinctive technique of stone tool manufacturing used by Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals. The technique involves the preparation of a core and striking edges off in a regular fashion around the core. Then a series of similarly sized pieces can be removed, which can then be turned into different tools.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Midfacial prognathism<\/strong>: A forward projection of the nose or the middle facial region. Usually associated with Neanderthals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong>: The stone tool industry of Neanderthals and their contemporaries in Africa and Western Asia. Mousterian tools are known for a diverse set of flake tools, which is different from the large bifacial tools of the Acheulean industry.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal aperture<\/strong>: The opening for the nose visible on a skull. Often pear- or heart-shaped.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital bun<\/strong>: A prominent bulge or projection on the back of the skull, specifically the occipital bone. This is a feature present only on Neanderthal skulls.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ochre<\/strong>: A natural clay pigment mixed with ferric oxide and clay and sand. Ranges in colour from brown to red to orange.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retracted face<\/strong>: A face that is flatter.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retromolar gap<\/strong>: A space behind the last molar and the end of the jaw. This is a feature present only on Neanderthals. It also occurs through cultural modification in modern humans who have had their third molars, or wisdom teeth, removed.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnh.org\/exhibitions\/permanent-exhibitions\/anne-and-bernard-spitzer-hall-of-human-origins\">Anne and Bernard Spitzer Hall of Human Origins<\/a>\u2014American Museum of Natural History.\r\n\r\n\u201cDawn of Humanity,\u201d PBS documentary, 2015\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ted.com\/talks\/svante_paeaebo_dna_clues_to_our_inner_neanderthal?language=en\">\u201cDNA Clues to Our Inner Neanderthal,\u201d<\/a> TED Talk by Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo, 2011.\r\n\r\n\u201cThe Dirt\u201d Podcast, Episode 30, <a href=\"https:\/\/thedirtpod.com\/episodes\/\/episode-30-the-human-family-tree-shrub-crabgrass-tumbleweed-part-3\">\u201cThe Human Family Tree (Shrub? Crabgrass? Tumbleweed?), Part 3: Very Humany Indeed\u201d<\/a>.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/page\/games-and-activities\">eFossil Games and Activities<\/a><\/p>\r\nFrank, Rebecca. 2021. \u201cThe Genus Homo.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual, <\/em><\/a>edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\/asian-research-projects\/hobbits-flores-indonesia.\">Hobbits on Flores, Indonesia<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/evolution.berkeley.edu\/evo-news\/lumping-or-splitting-in-the-fossil-record\/\">Lumping or Splitting in the Fossil Record<\/a> - UC Berkeley Understanding Evolution.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">Neandertals and More<\/a> - Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sapiens.org\/biology\/neanderthal-anatomy\/?fbclid=IwAR2Bcff1GVkTLnbCR58JAWiJzkk-Ell7zL0FUddf1HNAX6RDAZxbqh1zWoI\">Neanderthals: Body of Evidence<\/a> - SAPIENS.\r\n\r\nPerash, Rose L., and Kristen A. Broehl. 2021. \u201cHominin Review: Evolutionary Trends.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.\r\n\r\nPerkl, Bradley. \u201cBrain, Language, Lithics.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by<em>.<\/em> Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. CC BY-NC. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/shanidar-3-neanderthal-skeleton\">Shanidar 3 - Neanderthal Skeleton<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/species\">Species<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian Human Origins Program Facebook page<\/a> (@smithsonian.humanorigins).\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.smithsonianmag.com\/science-nature\/bringing-human-evolution-life-180951155\/\">Paleoartist Brings Human Evolution to Life<\/a> - Elisabeth Dayn\u00e9s.\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\r\nAckermann, Rebecca R., Matthew L. Arnold, et al. \u201cHybridization in Human Evolution: Insights from Other Organisms.\u201d Evolutionary Anthropology 28, no. 4 (July 2019): 189\u2013209. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21787\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21787<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6980311\/\">https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6980311\/<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Adler, Daniel S., Timothy J. Prindiville, and Nicholas J. Conard. 2003. \u201cPatterns of Spatial Organization and Land Use During the Eemian Interglacial in the Rhineland: New Data from Wallertheim, Germany.\u201d Eurasian Prehistory 1(2): 25\u201378.<\/p>\r\nAhlquist, K. D., Mayra M. Ba\u00f1uelos, Alyssa Funk, et al. \u201cOur Tangled Family Tree: New Genomic Methods Offer Insight into the Legacy of Archaic Admixture.\u201d Genome Biology and Evolution 13, no. 7 (July 2021): evab115. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/gbe\/evab115\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/gbe\/evab115<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/gbe\/article\/13\/7\/evab115\/6283580\">https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/gbe\/article\/13\/7\/evab115\/6283580<\/a>?\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alex, Bridget. 2018. \u201cNeanderthal Brains: Bigger, Not Necessarily Better.\u201d Discover, September 21, 2018. <a class=\"rId115\" href=\"https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better\">https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ashton, Nick M. 2002. \u201cAbsence of Humans in Britain during the Last Interglacial Period (Oxygen Isotope Stage 5e).\u201d <em>Publications du CERP<\/em> 8: 93\u2013103.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Lee R., John Hawks, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Lucas K. Delezene, Tracy L. Kivell, et al. 2015. \u201c<em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em>, a New Species of the Genus <em>Homo<\/em> from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 4:e09560. <a class=\"rId116\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId117\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">10.7554\/eLife.09560<\/a><a class=\"rId118\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Thomas D., and Erik Trinkaus. 1995. \u201cPatterns of Trauma among the Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>22 (6): 841\u2013852.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blangero, J., E.E. Quillen, M.A. Almeida, D.R. McKay, J.M. Peralta, S. Williams-Blangero, J.E. Curran, R. Duggirala, D.C. Glahn. 2014. \u201cGenomic Reconstruction of Neandertal Brain Structure and Function.\u201d Paper presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 12 April 2014.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocherens, Herv\u00e9, Daniel Billiou, Andr\u00e9 Mariotti, Maryl\u00e8ne Patou-Mathis, Marcel Otte, Dominique Bonjean, and Michel Toussaint. 1999. \u201cPalaeoenvionmental and Palaeodietary Implications of Isotopic Biogeochemistry of Last Interglacial Neanderthal and Mammal Bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium).\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 26 (6): 599\u2013607.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre and Anna Degioanni. 2013. \u201cNeanderthal Demographic Estimates.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 54 (S8): S202\u2013S213.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Boettger, Tatjana, Elena Yu. Novenko, Andrej A. Velichko, Olga K. Borisova, Konstantin V. Kremenetski, Stefan Knetsch, and Frank W. Junge. 2009. \u201cInstability of Climate and Vegetation Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe during the Final Stage of the Last Interglacial (Eemian, Mikulino) and Early Glaciation.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 207 (1-2): 137\u2013144. <a class=\"rId119\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId120\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Brophy, Juliet K., Marina C. Elliott, Darryl J. De Ruiter, Debra R. Bolter, Steven E. Churchill, Christopher S. Walker, John Hawks, and Lee R. Berger. 2021. \u201cImmature Hominin Craniodental Remains from a New Locality in the Rising Star Cave System, South Africa.\u201d <em>PaleoAnthropology <\/em>1: 1\u201314. <a class=\"rId121\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId122\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Browning, Sharon R., Brian L. Browning, Ying Zhou, Serena Tucci, and Josh M. Akey. 2018. \u201cAnalysis of Human Sequence Data Reveals Two Pulses of Archaic Denisovan Admixture.\u201d <em>Cell<\/em> 173 (1): 53\u201361.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chen, Fahu, Frido Welker, Chuan-Chou Shen, Shara E. Bailey, Inga Bergmann, Simon Davis, Huan Xia, et al. 2019. \u201cA Late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Mandible from the Tibetan Plateau.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 569: 409\u2013412. <a class=\"rId123\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 1998. \u201cCold Adaptations, Heterochrony, and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 7 (2): 46\u201360.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 2006. \u201cBioenergetic Perspective on Neanderthal Thermoregulatory and Activity Budgets.\u201d In <em>Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches and Perspectives<\/em>, edited by K. Havarti and T. Harrison, pp. 113\u2013134. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E., Robert G. Franciscus, Hilary A. McKean-Peraza, Julie A. Daniel, and Brittany R. Warren. 2009. \u201cShanidar 3 Neanderthal Rib Puncture Wound and Paleolithic Weaponry.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 57 (2): 163\u2013178.<\/p>\r\nCollinge, J., Whitfield, J., McKintosh, E., Beck, J., Mead, S., Thomas, D. J., &amp; Alpers, M. P. (2006). Kuru in the 21st century--an acquired human prion disease with very long incubation periods. <em>Lancet (London, England)<\/em>, 367(9528), 2068\u20132074. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cook, Rebecca W., Antonio Vazzana, Rita Sorrentino, Stefano Benazzi, Amanda L. Smith, David S. Strait, and Justin A. Ledogar. 2021. \u201cThe Cranial Biomechanics and Feeding Performance of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Interface Focus<\/em> 11 (5). <a class=\"rId124\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId125\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dawson, James E., and Erik Trinkaus. 1997. \u201cVertebral Osteoarthritis of La Chapelle-Aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>24 (11): 1015-1021. <a class=\"rId126\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Defleur, Alban R., and Emmanuel Desclaux. 2019. \u201cImpact of the Last Interglacial Climate Change on Ecosystems and Neanderthals Behavior at Baume Moula-Guercy, Ard\u00e8che, France.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 104: 114\u2013124. <a class=\"rId127\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degano, Ilaria, Sylvain Soriano, Paola Villa, Luca Pollarolo, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Zenobia Jacobs, Katerina Douka, Silvana Vitagliano, and Carlo Tozzi. 2019. \u201cHafting of Middle Paleolithic Tools in Latium (Central Italy): New Data from Fossellone and Sant\u2019Agostino Caves.\u201d <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14(10): 1\u201329. <a class=\"rId128\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId129\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degioanni Anna, Chritophe Bonenfant, Sandrine Cabut, and Silvana Condemi. 2019. Living on the Edge: Was Demographic Weakness the Cause of Neanderthal Demise? <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14 (5): e0216742.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId130\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId131\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Delpiano, Davide, Kristin Heasley, and Marci Peresani. 2018. \u201cAssessing Neanderthal Land Use and Lithic Raw Material Management in Discoid Technology.\u201d <em>Journal of Anthropological Sciences<\/em> 96: 89\u2013110. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">10.4436\/jass.96006.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Demeter, Fabrice, Cl\u00e9ment Zanolli, Kira E. Westaway, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Phillippe Duringer, Mike W. Morley, Frido Welker, et al. 2022. \u201cA Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Molar from the Annamite Chain of Northern Laos.\u201d <em>Nature Communications<\/em> 13 (1): 2557. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dirks, Paul H. G. M., Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, Jan D. Kramers, John Hawks, Anthony Dosseto, Mathieu Duval, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Age of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and Associated Sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>eLife<\/em> 6: e24231. <a class=\"rId135\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId136\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">10.7554\/eLife.24231. <\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">el-Showk, Sedeer. 2019. \u201cNeanderthal Clues to Brain Evolution in Humans.\u201d Nature 571: S10\u2013S11. <a class=\"rId137\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">10.1038\/<\/a><a class=\"rId139\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">d41586-019-02210-6<\/a><a class=\"rId140\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Esteban, Irene, Curtis W. Marean, Erich C. Fisher, Panagiotis Karkanas, Dan Carbanes, and Rosa M. Albert. 2018. \u201cPhytoliths as an Indicator of Early Modern Humans\u2019 Plant-Gathering Strategies, Fire, Fuel, and Site-Occupation Intensity During the Middle Stone Age at Pinnacle Point 5-6 (South Coast, South Africa).\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (6): 1\u201333.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evteev, Andrej A., Alla A. Movsesian, and Alexandra N. Grosheva. 2017. \u201cThe Association between Mid-facial Morphology and Climate in Northeast Europe Differs from That in North Asia: Implications for Understanding the Morphology of Late Pleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 107: 36\u201348. <a class=\"rId141\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.<\/a><\/p>\r\nFeng, Xiaobo, Qiyu Yin, Feng Gao, et al. \u201cThe Phylogenetic Position of the Yunxian Cranium Elucidates the Origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans.\u201d Science 389 (2025): 1320\u20131324. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.ado9202\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.ado9202<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Frayer, David W., Marina Lozano, Jose M. Bermudez de Castro, Eudald Carbonell, Juan-Luis Arsuaga, Jakov Radovcic, Ivana Fiore, and Luca Bondioli. 2012. \u201cMore Than 500,000 Years of Right-handedness in Europeans.\u201d <em>Laterality<\/em> 17 (1): 51\u201369. <a class=\"rId143\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fu, Qiaomei, Mateja Hajdinjak, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Silviu Constantin, Swapan Mallick, Pontus Skoglund, Nick Patterson, et al. 2015. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from Romania with a Recent Neanderthal Ancestor.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 524 (7564): 216. <a class=\"rId144\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine, Elizabeth S. Noack, Eduard Pop, Constantin Herbst, Johannes Pfleging, Jonas Buchli, Arne Jacob, et al. 2018. \u201cEvidence for Close-Range Hunting by Last Interglacial Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Nature Ecology and Evolution<\/em> 2: 1087\u20131092. <a class=\"rId145\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId146\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gilpin, William., Marcus W. Feldman, and Kenichi Aoki. 2016. \u201cAn Ecocultural Model Predicts Neanderthal Extinction through Competition with Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 113 (8): 2134\u20132139. <a class=\"rId147\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Golovanova, Liubov. Vitaliena, Vladimir B. Doronichev, Naomi E. Cleghorn, Marianna A. Koulkova, Tatiana V. Sapelko, and M. Steven Shackley. 2010. \u201cSignificance of Ecological Factors in the Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 51 (5): 655\u2013691. <a class=\"rId148\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1086\/656185.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Harrold, Francis B. 1980. \u201cA Comparative Analysis of Eurasian Paleolithic Burials.\u201d <em>World Archaeology <\/em>12 (2): 195\u2013211.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Hawks, John, Marina Elliott, Peter Schmid, Steven E. Churchill, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, et al. 2017. \"New Fossil Remains of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 6: e24232. <a class=\"rId149\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId150\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">10.7554\/eLife.24232.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Henry, Amanda G., Alison S. Brooks, and Dolores R. Piperno. 2010. \u201cMicrofossils and Calculus Demonstrate Consumption of Plants and Cooked Foods in Neanderthal Diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium).\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA<\/em> 108 (2): 486\u2013491. <a class=\"rId151\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Houldcroft, Charlotte J., and Simon J. Underdown. 2016. \u201cNeanderthal Genomics Suggests a Pleistocene Time Frame for the First Epidemiologic Transition.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 160 (3): 379\u2013388.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Emilia, Xin Jin, Asan, Zhuoma Bianba, Benjamin M. Peter, Nicolas Vinckenbosch, Yu Liang, et al. 2014. \u201cAltitude Adaptation in Tibetans Caused by Introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 512 (7513): 194-197.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jaouen, Klervia, Michael P. Richards, and Adeline Le Cabec. 2019. \u201cExceptionally High \u03b4<sup>15<\/sup>N Values in Collagen Single Amino Acids Confirm Neanderthals as High-Trophic Level Carnivores.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 116 (11): 4928\u20134933. <a class=\"rId152\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kandel, Andrew W., Michael Bolus, Knut Bretzke, Angela A. Bruch, Miriam N. Haidle, Christine Hertler, and Michael M\u00e4rker. 2015. \u201cIncreasing Behavioral Flexibility? An Integrative Macro-Scale Approach to Understanding the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa.\u201d<em> Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 23: 623\u2013668. <a class=\"rId153\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId154\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kortlandt, Adriaan. 2002. \u201cNeanderthal Anatomy and the Use of Spears.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 11 (5): 183\u2013184.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kruger, A., P. Randolph-Quinney, and M. Elliott. 2016. \u201cMultimodal Spatial Mapping and Visualization of Dinaledi Chamber and Rising Star Cave.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 112 (5\u20136). <a class=\"rId155\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lieberman, Philip, and Edmund S. Crelin. 1971. \u201cOn the Speech of Neanderthal Man.\u201d <em>Linguistic Inquiry<\/em> 2 (2): 203\u2013222.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mendez, Fernando L., G. David Poznik, Sergi Castellano, and Carlos D. Bustamante. 2016. \u201cThe Divergence of Neanderthal and Modern Human Y Chromosomes.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 98 (4): 728\u2013734.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mora-Berm\u00fadez, Felipe, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak, Jula Peters, Ronald Naumann, Lei Xing, Mihail Sarov, et al. 2022. \u201cLonger Metaphase and Fewer Chromosome Segregation Errors in Modern Human Than Neanderthal Brain Development.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 8 (30). <a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.<\/a><\/p>\r\nNi, Xijun, Qiang Ji, Wensheng Wu, et al. \u201cMassive Cranium from Harbin in Northeastern China Establishes a New Middle Pleistocene Human Lineage.\u201d The Innovation 2 (June 25, 2021): 100130. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xinn.2021.100130\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xinn.2021.100130<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nicholson, Christopher M. 2017. \u201cEemian Paleoclimate Zones and Neanderthal Landscape Use: A GIS Model of Settlement Patterning during the Last Interglacial.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 438 (B): 144\u2013157. <a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nobel Prize, The. 2022. \u201cPress Release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2022.\u201d Nobelf\u00f6rsamlingen The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. Press release, November 3, 2022. <a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.\">https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nowell, April. 2016. \u201cChildhood, Play and the Evolution of Cultural Capacity in Neanderthals and Modern Humans.\u201d In<em> The Nature of Culture: Based on an Interdisciplinary Symposium \u201cThe Nature of Culture,\u201d T\u00fcbingen, Germany<\/em>, edited by M. N. Haidle, N. J. Conard, and M. Bolus, 87\u201397. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. <a class=\"rId160\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1007\/978-94-017-7426-0_9<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Parkington, John. 2003. \u201cMiddens and Moderns: Shellfishing and the Middle Stone Age of the Western Cape, South Africa.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 99 (5\u20136): 243\u2013274.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pearce, Eiluned, Chris Stringer, and R. I. M. Dunbar. 2013. \u201cNew Insights into Differences in Brain Organizations between Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 280 (1758): 20130168. <a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168<\/a><a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">.<\/a><\/p>\r\nPeyr\u00e9gne, St\u00e9phane, Diyendo Massilani, Yaniv Swie,l et al. (2025). \u201cA High\u2011Coverage Genome from a 200,000\u2011Year-Old Denisovan.\u201d bioRxiv, October 20, 2025. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.10.20.683404\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.10.20.683404<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pomeroy, Emma, Paul Bennett, Chris O. Hunt, Tim Reynolds, Lucy Farr, Marine Frouin, James Holman, Ross Lane, Charles French, and Graeme Barker. 2020. \u201cNew Neanderthal Remains Associated with the \u2018Flower Burial\u2019 at Shanidar Cave.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 94 (373): 11\u201326. <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.<\/a><\/p>\r\nRadford, A., &amp; Scragg, R. (2013). Discovery of Kuru Revisited: How Anthropology Hindered Then Enhanced Kuru Research. <em>Health and History, 15<\/em>(2), 29\u201352. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rae, Todd, Thomas Koppe, and Chris B. Stringer. 2011. \u201cThe Neanderthal Face Is Not Cold-Adapted.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 60 (2): 234\u2013239. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.<\/a><\/p>\r\nRan, J; Xia, H; Xing, S; Li, H; Chen F. Homo longi, Denisovans, Neanderthal and other archaic hominins in eastern Asia prior to the rise of Homo sapiens. Science Bulletin. 2026; 71:973-976.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. 2010. \u201cGenetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 468: 1053\u20131060. <a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richards, Michael P., Paul B. Pettit, Erik Trinkaus, Fred H. Smith, Maja Paunovi\u0107, and Ivor Karavani\u0107. 2000. \u201cNeanderthal Diet at Vindija and Neanderthal Predation: The Evidence from Stable Isotopes.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 97 (13): 7663\u20137666.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">10.1073\/pnas.120178997.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richter, J\u00fcrgen, 2006. \u201cNeanderthals in Their Landscape: Neanderthals in Europe.\u201d In <em>Proceedings of the International Conference held in the Gallo-Roman Museum in Tongeren<\/em>, ERAUL 117, edited by B. Demarsin and M. Otte, 17\u201332. K\u00f6ln: Universit\u00e4t zu K\u00f6ln.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roksandic, Mirjana, Predrag Radovic, Xiu-Jie Wu, and Christopher J. Bae. 2021. \u201cResolving the \u2018Muddle in the Middle\u2019: The Case for <em>Homo bodoensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em>, 31 (1). <a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">10.1002\/evan.21929.<\/a><\/p>\r\nRougier, H., Crevecoeur, I., Beauval, C., Posth, C., Flas, D., Wi\u00dfing, C., Furtw\u00e4ngler, A., Germonpr\u00e9, M., G\u00f3mez-Olivencia, A., Semal, P., van der Plicht, J., Bocherens, H., &amp; Krause, J. (2016). Neandertal cannibalism and Neandertal bones used as tools in Northern Europe. <em>Scientific Reports, 6<\/em>(1). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slon, Viviane, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Benjamin Vernot, Cesare de Filippo, Steffi Grote, Bence Viola, Mateja Hajdinjak, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Genome of the Offspring of a Neanderthal Mother and a Denisovan Father.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 561 (7721): 113\u2013116.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smith, Tanya M., Paul Tafforeau, Donald J. Reid, Joanne Pouech, Vincent Lazzari, John P. Zermeno, Debbi Guatelli-Steinberg, et al. 2010. \u201cDental Evidence for Ontogenetic Differences Between Modern Humans and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (49): 20923\u201320928.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Staubwasser, Michael, Virgil Dr\u0103gu\u0282in, Bogdan P. Onac, Sergey Assonov, Vasile Ersek, Dirk L. Hoffman, and Daniel Veres. 2018. \u201cImpact of Climate Change on the Transition of Neanderthals to Modern Humans in Europe.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 115 (37): 9116\u20139121. <a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stewart, T. D. 1977. \u201cThe Neanderthal Skeletal Remains from Shanidar Cave, Iraq: A Summary of Findings to Date.\u201d<em> Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society <\/em>121 (2): 121\u2013165.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stolarczyk, Regine E., and Patrick Schmidt. 2018. \u201cIs Early Silcrete Heat Treatment a New Behavioural Proxy in the Middle Stone Age?\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (10): 1\u201321.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trinkaus, E. 1985. \u201cPathology and Posture of the La-Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology <\/em>67 (1): 19\u201341.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trujillo Cleber A., Edward S. Rice, Nathan K. Schaefer, Isaac A. Chaim, Emily C. Wheeler, Assael A. Madrigal, Justin Buchanan, et al. 2021. \u201cReintroduction of the Archaic Variant of NOVA1 in Cortical Organoids Alters Neurodevelopment.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 371 (6530): eaax2537. <a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.<\/a><\/p>\r\nTu, H., Feng, X., Luo, L.; et al. 2026. The oldest in situ Homo erectus crania in eastern Asia: The Yunxian site dates to ~1.77 Ma. Science Advances. 12, eady2270.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tucci, Serena, Samuel H. Vohr, Rajiv C. McCoy, Benjamin Vernot, Matthew R. Robinson, Chiara Barbieri, Brad J. Nelson, et al. 2018. \u201cEvolutionary History and Adaptation of a Human Pygmy Population of Flores Island, Indonesia.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 361 (6401): 511\u2013516.<\/p>\r\nUllrich H, 2005: Cannibalistic Rites within Mortuary Practices from the Paleolithic to Middle Ages in Europe. <em>Anthropologie (Brno)<\/em> 43, 2-3: 249-261.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Van Andel, T. H., and P. C. Tzedakis. 1996. \u201cPaleolithic Landscapes of Europe and Environs, 150,000\u201325,000 Years Ago: An Overview.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 15 (5\u20136): 481\u2013500.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Venner, Stephen J. 2018. \u201cA New Estimate for Neanderthal Energy Expenditure.\u201d CUNY Academic Works.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Vernot, Benjamin, Serena Tucci, Janet Kelso, Joshua G. Schraiber, Aaron B. Wolf, Rachel M. Gittelman, Michael Danneman, et al. 2016. \u201cExcavating Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA from the Genomes of Melanesian Individuals.\u201d <em>Science <\/em>352 (6282): 235\u2013239.<\/p>\r\nVillanea, F. A., Peede, D., Kaufman, E. J., et al. (2023). The muc19 gene: An evolutionary history of recurrent introgression and natural selection. National Library of Medicine. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2023.09.25.559202\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Weaver, T. D., and J. Hublin. 2009. \u201cNeanderthal Birth Canal Shape and the Evolution of Human Childbirth.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 106 (20): 8151\u20138156.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wi\u1e9eing, Christoph, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Rougier, Isabelle Crevecoer, Mietje Germonpr\u00e9, Yuichi Naito, Patrick Semal, and Herv\u00e9 Bocherens. 2015. \u201cIsotopic Evidence for Dietary Ecology of Late Neanderthals in Northwestern Europe.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 411 (A): 327\u2013345. <a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wong, Kate. 2015. \u201cNeanderthal Minds.\u201d <em>Scientific American<\/em> (January): 312(2): 36-43. <a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zhang, X. L., B. B. Ha, S. J. Wang, Z. J. Chen, J. Y. Ge, H. Long, W. He, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Earliest Human Occupation of the High-Altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 Thousand to 30 Thousand Years Ago.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 362 (6418): 1049\u20131051. <a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.<\/a><\/p>\r\nZeberg, Hugo, Mattias Jakobsson, &amp; Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. (2024). \u201cThe Genetic Changes That Shaped Neandertals, Denisovans, and Modern Humans.\u201d Cell 187, no. 5:1047\u20131058. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cell.2023.12.029\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cell.2023.12.029<\/a>.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zilh\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Diego E. Angelucci, Ernestina Badal-Garc\u00eda, Francesco d'Errico, Flor\u00e9al Daniel, Laure Dayet, Katerina Douka, et al. 2010. \u201cSymbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (3): 1023\u20131028. <a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zollikofer, Christopher Peter Edwards, and Marcia Silvia Ponce de Le\u00f3n. 2013. \u201cPandora\u2019s Growing Box: Inferring the Evolution and Development of Hominin Brains from Endocasts.\u201d Evolutionary Anthropology 22 (1): 20\u201333. <a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2>Acknowledgements<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The authors would like to extend their thanks to Cassandra Gilmore and Anna Goldfield for thoughtful and insightful suggestions on the first edition of this chapter.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Peyton Dagg, Bryana Henry, Anoriel Jacques, Saehee Yoon, and Brandon Hawke<\/h6>\n<p>Learn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/about-the-authors\/\">authors and editors<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\"> Hess&#8217; student contributions<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/versioning-history\/\">versioning history<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the main groupings of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as Neanderthals.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how shifting environmental conditions required flexibility of adaptations, both anatomically and behaviourally.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the unique anatomical and cultural characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens, <\/em>including Neanderthals, in contrast to other hominins.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Articulate how Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils fit into evolutionary trends including cranial capacity (brain size) development, cultural innovations, and migration patterns.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the shared traits, regional variations, and local adaptations among Archaic <em>Homo sapiens.<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Detail the increased complexity and debates surrounding the classification of hominins in light of transitional species, species admixture, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Breaking the Stigma of the &#8220;Caveman&#8221;<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What do you think of when you hear the word \u201ccaveman\u201d? Perhaps you imagine a character from a film such as <em>The Croods<\/em>, <em>Tarzan<\/em>, and <em>Encino Man<\/em> or from the cartoon <em>The Flintstones<\/em>. Maybe you picture the tennis-playing, therapy-going hairy Neanderthals from Geico Insurance commercials. Or perhaps you imagine characters from <em>The Far Side<\/em> or <em>B.C.<\/em> comics. Whichever you picture, the character in your mind is likely stooped over with a heavy brow, tangled long locks and other body hair, and clothed in animal skins, if anything. They might be holding a club with a confused look on their face, standing at the entrance to a cave or dragging an animal carcass to a fire for their next meal (see Figure 12.1). You might have even signed up to take this course because of what you knew\u2014or expected to learn\u2014about \u201ccavemen.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 163px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.pixabay.com\/photo\/2013\/07\/13\/12\/36\/caveman-159964_1280.png\" alt=\"Free caveman beard man vector\" width=\"163\" height=\"317\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.1: Cartoon illustration of a prehistoric \u201ccaveman\u201d, commonly used as a visual representation of early humans in the Stone Age. Credit: <em data-start=\"261\" data-end=\"293\">Caveman, Beard, Man, Primitive<\/em> free to use under the Pixabay <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/license-summary\/\">Content License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">These images have long been the stigma and expectation about our ancestors at the transition to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Tracing back to works as early as Carl Linnaeus, scientists once propagated and advanced this imagery, creating a clear picture in the minds of early scholars that informed the general public, even through today, that Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, \u201ccavemen,\u201d were somehow fundamentally different and much less intelligent than we are now. Unfortunately, this view is overly simplistic, misleading, and incorrect. Understanding what Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were actually like requires a much more complex and nuanced picture, one that comes into sharper focus as continuing research uncovers more about the lives of our not-too-distant (and not-too-different) ancestors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The first characterizations of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were formed from limited fossil evidence in a time when <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1582\">ethnocentric<\/a><\/strong> and species-centric perspectives (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1583\">anthropocentrism<\/a><\/strong>) were more widely accepted and entrenched in both society and science. Today, scientists are working from a more complete fossil record from three continents (Africa, Asia, and Europe), and genetic evidence informs their analyses and conclusions. The existence of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> marks an exciting point in our lineage\u2014a point at which many modern traits had emerged and key refinements were on the horizon. Anatomically, humans today are not that much different from Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Changing Environment<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While modern climate change is of critical concern today due to its cause (human activity) and pace (unprecedentedly rapid), the existence of global climate change itself is not a recent phenomenon. The focus of this chapter, the Middle Pleistocene (roughly between 780 kya and 125 kya), is the time period in which Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears in the fossil record\u2014a time that witnessed some of the most drastic climatic changes in human existence. During this time period, there were 15 major and 50 minor glacial events in Europe, alone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What exactly is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1635\">glaciation<\/a><\/strong>? When scientists talk about glacial events, they are referring to the climate being in an ice age. This means that the ocean levels were much lower than today, because much of the earth\u2019s water was tied up in large glaciers or ice sheets. Additionally, the average temperature would have been much cooler, which would have better supported an Arctic or tundra-adapted plant-and-animal ecosystem in northern latitudes. The most interesting and relevant features of Middle Pleistocene glacial events are the sheer number of them and their repeated bouts: this era alternated between glacial periods and warmer periods, known as<strong> interglacials<\/strong>. In other words, the planet wasn\u2019t in an ice age the whole time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">You can see the dramatic and increasing fluctuations in temperature, recorded through <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_906\">foraminifera<\/a><\/strong>, in Figure 12.2. The distance between highs and lows demonstrates the severity of temperature shifts. Much as the Richter scale represents more intense earthquakes with more dramatic peaks, so too does this chart, which uses dramatic peaks to demonstrate intense temperature swings.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_346\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-346\" style=\"width: 1753px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-329\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/All_palaeotemps.png\" alt=\"The graph shows changes in Earth\u2019s temperature for the last 540 My.\" width=\"1753\" height=\"565\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-346\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.2: The Geologic Timescale and corresponding temperature shifts. Wide and rapid shifts took place during the Pleistocene (the second box from the right). More dramatic fluctuations depict greater severity of temperature shift. The Eocene, Pliocene, and Holocene epochs had more stable temperatures. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:All_palaeotemps.png\">All paleotemps<\/a> by Glen Fergus is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods are defined by Earth\u2019s average temperature being lower. Worldwide, temperatures are reduced, with cold areas becoming even colder. Huge portions of the landscape may have become inaccessible during glacial events due to the formation of glaciers and massive ice sheets. In Europe, the Scandinavian continental glacier covered what is today Ireland, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and some of continental Europe. Plant and animal communities shifted to lower latitudes along the periphery of ice sheets. Additionally, some new land was opened during glacials. Evaporation with little runoff reduced sea levels by as much as almost 150 metres, shifting coastlines outward by in some instances as much as almost 100 kilometres. Additionally, land became exposed that connected what were previously unconnected continents such as Africa into Yemen at the Gulf of Aden.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods also affected equatorial regions and other regions that are today thought of as warmer or at least more temperate parts of the globe, including Africa. While these areas were not covered with glaciers, increased global glaciation resulted in lower sea levels and expanded coastlines. Cooler temperatures were accompanied by the drying of the climate, which caused significantly reduced rainfall, increased aridity, and the expansion of deserts. It is an interesting question to consider whether the same plants and animals that lived in these regions prior to the ice ages would be able to survive and thrive in this new climate. Plant and animal communities shifted in response to the changing climate, whenever possible.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Surviving During the Middle Pleistocene<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rather than a single selective force, the Middle Pleistocene was marked by periods of fluctuation, not just cold periods. Interglacials interrupted glaciations, reversing trends in sea level, coastline, temperature, precipitation, and aridity, as well as glacier size and location. Interglacials are marked by increased rainfall and a higher temperature, which causes built-up ice in glaciers to melt. This leads to glacial retreat, which is the shrinking of glaciers and the movement of the glaciers back toward the poles, as we\u2019ve seen in our lifetime. During interglacials, sea levels increase, flooding some previously exposed coastlines and continental connections. In addition, plant and animal communities shift accordingly, often finding more temperate climates to the north and less arid and more humid climates in the tropics (Van Andel and Tzedakis 1996).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientists have found that the Olorgesailie region in southern Kenya was at various times in the Middle Pleistocene a deep lake, a drought-dried lakebed with an area criss-crossed by small streams, and a grassland. While various animal species would have moved in and out of the area as the climate shifted, some animal species went extinct, and new, often related, species took up residence. The trend, scientists noted, was that animals with more specialized features went extinct and animals with more generalized features, such as animals we see today, survived in this changing climatic time period. For example, a zebra with specialized teeth for eating grass was ultimately replaced by a zebra that could eat both grass and other types of vegetation. If this small, localized example shows such a dramatic change in terms of the environment and the plant and animal biocommunities, what would have been the impact on humans?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is no way humans could have escaped the effects of Middle Pleistocene climate change, no matter what region of the world they were living in. As noted earlier, and as evidenced by what was seen in the other biotic communities, humans would have faced changing food sources as previous sources of food may have gone extinct or moved to a different latitude. Depending on where they were living, fresh water may have been limited. Durial glacials, lower sea levels would have given humans more land to live on, while the interglacials would have reduced the available land through the increase in rainfall and associated sea level rise. Dry land connections between the continents would have made movement from one continent to another by foot easier at times than today, although these passageways were not consistently available through the Middle Pleistocene due to the glacial\/interglacial cycle. Finally, as evidenced by the Olorgesailie region in Kenya, during the Middle Pleistocene animal species that were overly specialized to one particular type of environment were less likely to survive when compared to their more generalized counterparts. Evidence suggests that this same pattern may have held true for Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, in terms of their ability to survive this dramatic period of climate change.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Defining Characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> share our species name but are distinguished by the term \u201cArchaic\u201d as a way of recognizing both the long period of time between their appearance and ours, as well as the way in which human traits have continued to evolve over time\u2014making Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>look slightly different from us today, despite being considered the same species. Living throughout Africa, and the Middle East during the Middle Pleistocene, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are considered, in many ways, transitional between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>(see Figure 12.3). Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> share the defining trait of an increased brain size of at least 1,100 cc and averaging 1,200 cc, although there are significant regional and temporal (time) variations. Because of these variations, scientists disagree on whether these fossils represent a single, variable species or multiple, closely related species (sometimes called <em>Homo antecessor<\/em>,<em> Homo bodoensis, Homo heidelbergensis<\/em>,<em> Homo georgicus<\/em>,<em> Homo neanderthalensis<\/em>, and <em>Homo rhodesiensis<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An active area of scholarship in the discipline involves reconciling the diversity of species from this time period and establishing the phylogenetic relationships between them. The term \u201cArchaic <em>Homo sapiens\u201d <\/em>can mean different things to different scholars within the discipline. The intent of this chapter is to provide an understanding of the diversity of this time period and provide data used to make interpretations from among the most likely possibilities. Although we recognize that some anthropologists split many of these fossils into separate species, until the issue is resolved at the discipline level, this chapter will rely on the widely used naming conventions that refer to many fossils from this time period as Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. We will discuss these contemporaneous fossils as a unit<em>, <\/em>with the exception of a particularly unique population living in Europe and West Asia known as the Neanderthals, which we will examine separately.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 12.3: A comparison of Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. This table compares key traits of the crania and postcrania that distinguish these three hominins. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens table (Figure 11.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trait<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Homo <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>erectus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Archaic <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens <\/em><\/strong><strong>(including Neaderthals)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anatomically Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Time<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1.8 mya\u2013200,000 ya<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u201340,000 ya<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">315,000 ya\u2013today<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">900 cc<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc (1,500 cc when including Neanderthals)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,400 cc<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low,<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">angular<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and high, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1643\">globular<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Forehead<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal Region<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting nasal bones (bridge of the nose), no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wider nasal aperture and some midfacial prognathism, particularly pronounced among Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Narrower nasal aperture, no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Facial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge and large projecting face<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small brow ridge and<strong> retracted face<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Skull Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nuchal torus, sagittal keel, thick cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting occipital bone, often called occipital bun in Neanderthals; intermediate thickness of cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small bump on rear of skull, if anything; thin cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large teeth, especially front teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth; front teeth still large;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">retromolar gap in Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smaller teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">More gracile bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When comparing <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, one can see that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> are intermediate in their physical form. For some features, this follows the trends first seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> with other features having early, less developed forms of traits seen in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. For example, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> trended toward less angular and higher skulls than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em><em>. <\/em>However, the archaic skulls were not as short and globular and had less developed foreheads compared to anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> had smaller brow ridges and a less-projecting face than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and slightly smaller teeth, although incisors and canines were often about as large as those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>. Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>also had a wider <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1638\">nasal aperture<\/a><\/strong>, or opening for the nose, and a forward-projecting midfacial region, which is later seen more fully developed among Neanderthals and is known as <strong>midfacial prognathism<\/strong>. The occipital bone often projected and the cranial bone was of intermediate thickness, somewhat reduced from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> but not nearly as thin as that of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>The postcrania remained fairly robust. Identifying a set of features that is unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> is a challenging task, due to both individual and geographic variation\u2014these developments were not all present to the same degree in all individuals. Neanderthals are the exception, as they had several unique traits that made them notably different from modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> as well as their closely related Archaic cousins.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 299px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast.\" width=\"299\" height=\"299\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.4: \u201cBroken Hill Man,\u201d found at Kabwe in Zambia, shows common traits associated with archaic Homo sapiens in Africa, including a large brain, taller cranium, and Homo erectus-like features such as massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-broken-hill-1-rhodesian-man-BH-004\">Homo heidelbergensis Cranium Broken Hill 1 (Rhodesian Man)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The one thing that is clear about Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is that, despite general features, there is a lot of regional variation, which is first seen in the different <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> specimens across Asia and Africa. While the general features of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, identified earlier, are present in the fossils of this time period, there are significant regional differences. The majority of this regional variation lies in the degree to which fossils have features more closely aligned with <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> or with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 244px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-5.png\" alt=\"Side view of the Dali cranium.\" width=\"244\" height=\"213\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.5: Dali cranium, found at Dali, China, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Asia, including large and robust features with heavy brow ridges like Homo erectus and a large cranial capacity intermediate between Homo erectus and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. Credit: Dali skull original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by <a href=\"https:\/\/marynelsonstudio.com\">Mary Nelson<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>To illustrate this point, we will examine three exemplary specimens, one from each of the three continents on which Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived. First, in Africa, a specimen from Broken Hill is one of several individuals found in the Kabwe lead mine in Zambia. It had a large brain (1,300 cc) and taller cranium as well as many <em>Homo erectus-<\/em>like skull features, including massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones (Figure 12.4). Second, one partial crania from Dali, China, is representative of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>in Asia, with large and robust features with heavy brow ridges, akin to what is seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a large cranial capacity intermediate between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Figure 12.5). Third, an almost-complete skeleton was found in northern Spain at Atapuerca. Atapuerca 5 (Figure 12.6) has thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, and a more rounded cranium than seen previously. Additionally, Atapuerca 5 demonstrates features that foreshadow Neanderthals, including increased midfacial prognathism. After examining some of the fossils such as those from Kabwe, Dali, and Atapuerca, the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is clear: their features place them squarely between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 293px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast with mandible.\" width=\"293\" height=\"293\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.6: Atapuerca 5 archaic Homo sapiens, found in northern Spain, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Europe, including a thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, a more rounded cranium, and increased midfacial projection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-atapuerca-5-BH-022\">Homo heidelbergensis Skull Atapuerca 5<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Due to the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, identifying the time period with which they are associated is problematic and complex. Generally, it is agreed that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived between 600,000 and 200,000 years ago, with regional variation and overlap between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> on the early end of the spectrum and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>and Neanderthals on the latter end. The earliest-known Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>fossils tentatively date to about 600,000 years ago in Africa, to around 300,000 years ago in Asia, and to about 350,000 years ago in Europe (and potentially as early as 600,000 years ago). Determining the end point of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also problematic since it largely depends upon when the next subspecies of <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears and the classification of highly intermediate specimens. For example, in Africa, the end of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is met with the appearance of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, while in Europe it is the appearance of Neanderthals that is traditionally seen as marking the transition from other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to remember that this time period is represented by many branching relationships and assuming an evolutionary trajectory that follows a single linear path would not be correct. Even still, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>mark an important chapter in the human lineage, connecting more ancestral forms, such as <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. During this period of climatic transition and fluctuation, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> mirror the challenges of their environments. Showing increasing regional variation due to the need for local adaptation, there is no single archetype for this group; the defining characteristic seems to be variability.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One well-known population of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are the Neanderthals, named after the site where they were first discovered in the Neander Valley, or \u201cthal\u201d in German, located near Dusseldorf, Germany. Popularly known as the stereotypical \u201ccavemen\u201d examined at the outset of this chapter, recent research is upending long-held beliefs about this group of Archaics. Neanderthal behaviour was increasingly complex, far beyond what was exhibited by even other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> discussed throughout this chapter. We implore you to forget the image of the iconic caveman and have an open mind when exploring the fossil evidence of the Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to understand why Neanderthals are separated from other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Unlike the rest of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals are easily defined and identified in many ways. Evidence suggests the time period when Neanderthals lived was between 150,000 and 40,000 years ago. There is a clear geographic boundary of where Neanderthals lived: western Europe, the Middle East, and western Asia. No Neanderthal fossils have ever been discovered outside of this area, including Africa. This is a bit curious, as other Archaics seem to have adapted in Africa and then migrated elsewhere, but Neanderthals\u2019 regional association makes sense in light of the environment to which they were best adapted: namely, extreme cold weather. Additionally, Neanderthals have a unique and distinct cluster of physical characteristics. While a few aspects of Neanderthals are shared among some Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as the types of tools, most Neanderthal anatomical and behavioural attributes are unique to them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals lived during some of the coldest times during the last Ice Age and at far northern latitudes. This means Neanderthals were living very close to the glacial edge, rather than in a more temperate region of the globe like some of their Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> relatives. While able to survive in arctic conditions, most Neanderthal sites dating to the glacial periods were found farther away from the severe cold, in a steppe tundra-like environment, which would have been more hospitable to Neanderthals, and their food sources, both flora and fauna (Ashton 2002; Nicholson 2017; Richter 2006). Their range likely expanded and contracted along with European glacial events, moving into the Middle East during glacial events when Europe became even cooler, and when the animals they hunted would have moved for the same reason. During interglacials, when Europe warmed a bit, Neanderthals and their prey would have been able to move back into Western Europe. Clearly, the true hallmark of Neanderthals is their adaptation to an unstable environment, shifting between warm and cold, as the climate was in constant flux throughout their existence (Adler Et al. 2003; Boettger Et al. 2009).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Many of the Neanderthals\u2019 defining physical features are more extreme and robust versions of traits seen in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, clustered in this single population. Brain size, namely an enlargement of the cranial capacity, is one such trait. The average Neanderthal brain size is around 1,500 cc, and the range for Neanderthal brains can extend to upwards of 1,700 cc. The majority of the increase in the brain occurs in the occipital region, or the back part of the brain, resulting in a skull that has a large cranial capacity with a distinctly long and low shape that is slightly wider than previous forms at the far back of the skull. Modern humans have a brain size comparable to that of Neanderthals; however, our brain expansion occurred in the frontal region of the brain, not the back, as in Neanderthal brains. This difference is also the main reason why Neanderthals lack the vertical forehead that modern humans possess. They simply did not need an enlarged forehead, because their brain expansion occurred in the rear of their brain. Due to cranial expansion, the back of the Neanderthal skull is less angular (as compared to <em>Homo erectus<\/em>), but not as rounded as <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, producing an elongated shape, akin to a football.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another feature that continues the trend noted in previous hominins is the enlargement of the nasal region, or the nose. Neanderthal noses are large and have a wide nasal aperture, which is the opening for the nose. While the nose is only made up of two bones, the nasals, the true size of the nose can be determined by looking at other facial features, including the nasal aperture, and the angle of the nasal and maxillary, or facial bones. In Neanderthals, these indicate a large, forward-projecting nose that appears to be pulled forward away from the rest of the face. This feature is further emphasized by the backward-sloping nature of the cheekbones, or the zygomatic arches. The unique shape and size of the Neanderthal nose is often characterized by the term <em>midfacial prognathism<\/em>\u2014a jutting out of the middle portion of the face, or nose. This is in sharp contrast to the prognathism exhibited by other hominins, who exhibited prognathism, or the jutting out, of their jaws.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The teeth of the Neanderthals follow a similar pattern seen in the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, which is an overall reduction in size, especially as compared to the extremely large teeth seen in the genus <em>Australopithecus<\/em>. However, while the teeth continued to reduce, the jaw size did not keep pace, leaving Neanderthals with an oversized jaw for their teeth, and a gap between their final molar and the end of their jaw. This gap is called a <strong>retromolar gap<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The projecting occipital bone present in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also more prominent in Neanderthals, extending the trend found in Archaics. Among Neanderthals, this projection of bone is easily identified by its bun shape on the back of the skull and is known as an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1645\">occipital bun<\/a><\/strong>. This projection appears quite similar to a dinner roll in size and shape. Its purpose, if any, remains unknown.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuing the Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>trend, Neanderthal brow ridges are prominent but somewhat smaller in size than those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and earlier Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em>In Neanderthals, the brow ridges are also often slightly less arched than those of other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In addition to extending traits present in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>Neanderthals possess several distinct traits. Neanderthal <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1646\">infraorbital foramina<\/a><\/strong>, the holes in the maxillae or cheek bones through which blood vessels pass, are notably enlarged compared to other hominins. The Neanderthal postcrania are also unique in that they demonstrate increased robusticity in terms of the thickness of bones and body proportions that show a barrel-shaped chest and short, stocky limbs, as well as increased musculature. These body portions are seen across the spectrum of Neanderthals\u2014in men, women, and children.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Traditionally, many of the unique traits that Neanderthals possess were seen as adaptations to the extreme cold, dry environments in which they often lived and which exerted strong selective forces. For example, Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules dictate that an increased body mass and short, stocky limbs are common in animals that live in cold conditions. Neanderthals were said to have matched the predictions of Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules perfectly (Churchill 2006). In addition, the Neanderthal skull also exhibits adaptations to the cold. Neanderthals\u2019 large infraorbital foramina allow for larger blood vessels, increasing the volume of blood that is found closest to the skin, which helps to keep the skin warmer. Their enlarged noses resulted in longer nasal passages and mucus membranes that warmed and moistened cold air before it reached the lungs. The Neanderthals\u2019 larger nose has long been thought to have acted as a humidifier, easing physical exertion in their climate, although research on this particular trait continues to be studied and debated (Rae Et al. 2011).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">New research, however, seems to suggest that these unique skeletal adaptations might not have been strict adaptations to cold weather (Evteev Et al. 2017; Pearce Et al. 2013). For example, large brow ridges might have served as a way to shade the face from the sun. The increased occipital portion of the brain, some researchers state, was to support a larger visual system present in Neanderthals. This visual system would have given them increased light sensitivity, which would have been useful in higher latitudes that had dark winters. And, while recent modeling of nostril airflow on reconstructed Neanderthal specimens supports the notion that Neanderthals had extensive mucus membranes inside their noses, the data shows that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are superior to Neanderthals in our ability to use our noses as a way to warm and cool air. However, Neanderthals were able to snort air through their noses better than we can. Why is this important? When combined with the fact that Neanderthals tended to prefer a more temperate, tundra-like environment, and that other physical traits suggest that Neanderthals had huge bodies that needed massive amounts of calories to sustain them, the picture gets clearer. Massive amounts of energy would have been required to power a Neanderthal body, and anything that might have made them more calorically efficient would have been favoured. Efficient breathing, through larger noses into large lungs, meaning deeper breaths, would have been favoured. To further save energy expenditure, body sizes might have been sacrificed as well. These same types of adaptations are similar to ones seen in children today who are born in high altitudes, not cold climates. Figure 12.7 provides a summary of these unique features of the Neanderthal.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 12.7: Neanderthal distinguishing features. This table outlines key features associated with Neanderthals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Neanderthal distinguishing features table (Figure 11.6)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 21pt\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\" colspan=\"2\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Distinct Neanderthal Anatomical Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brow Ridge Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nose Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large, with midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced, but large jaw size, creating retromolar gap<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital Region<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Enlarged occipital region, occipital bun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Unique Cranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large infraorbital foramina<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel-shaped chest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A classic example of a Neanderthal with all of the characteristics mentioned above is the nearly complete La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal, from France. This is a male skeleton, with a brain size of around 1640cc, an extremely large nose and infraorbital foramina, brow ridges that are marked in size, and an overall robust skeleton (Figure 12.8).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 390px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-4.png\" alt=\"A reproduction of a complete Neanderthal skeleton.\" width=\"390\" height=\"689\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.8: La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal is representative of many classic Neanderthal features, including a large brain, large nose, large infraorbital foramina, large brow ridges, and robust postcrania. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/neanderthal-skeleton-articulated-SC-019-A\">Neanderthal Skeleton Articulated<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Tool Making and Use<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One key Neanderthal adaptation was their cultural innovations, which are an important way that hominins adapt to their environment. As you recall, <em>Homo erectus<\/em>&#8216;s tools, Acheulean handaxes, represented an increase in complexity over Oldowan tools, allowing more efficient removal of meat and possibly calculated scavenging. In contrast, Neanderthal tools mark a significant innovation in tool-making technique and use with <strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong> (named after the Le Moustier site in southwest France). These tools were significantly smaller, thinner, and lighter than Acheulean handaxes and formed a true toolkit. The materials used for Mousterian tools were of higher quality, which allowed for both more precise toolmaking and tool reworking when the tools broke or dulled after frequent reuse. The use of higher-quality materials is also indicative of required forethought and planning to acquire them for tool manufacture. It has been suggested that the Neanderthals, unlike <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, saved and reused their tools, rather than making new ones each time a tool was needed.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 290px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-4.png\" alt=\"Large flakes separated from the core.\" width=\"290\" height=\"159\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.9: The Levallois technique is used to create Mousterian tools. The multistep process involves preparing the core in a specific way to yield flakes that can be used as tools. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nucl%C3%A9us_Levallois_La-Parrilla.png\">Nucl\u00e9us Levallois La-Parrilla<\/a> by Jos\u00e9-Manuel Benito \u00c1lvarez is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.5\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.5 License<\/a>..<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mousterian tools are constructed in a very unique manner, utilizing the <strong>Levallois technique<\/strong> (Figure 12.9), named after the first finds of tools made with this technique, which were discovered in the Levallois-Perret suburb of Paris, France. The Levallois technique is a multistep process that requires preparing the core, or raw material, in a specific way that will yield flakes that are roughly uniform in dimension. The flakes are then turned into individual tools. The preparation of the core is akin to peeling a potato or carrot with a vegetable peeler\u2014when peeling vegetables, you want to remove the skin in long, regular strokes, so that you are taking off the same amount of the vegetable all the way around. In the same way, the Levallois technique requires removing all edges of the <strong>cortex<\/strong>, or outside surface of the raw material, in a circle before removing the lid. The flakes, which will eventually be turned into the individual tools, can then be removed from the core. The potential yield of tools from one core would be many, as seen in Figure 12.10, compared to all previous tool-making processes, in which one core yielded a single tool. This manufacturing process might be considered the ultimate zero-waste tool-making technique (Delpiano Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 589px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-4.png\" alt=\"Levallois core and flakes that are gray in color and various shapes and sizes.\" width=\"589\" height=\"470\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.10: Levallois core and flakes for tool production. Using this technique, one core is used to produce many flakes, each of which can be turned into a tool. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:NHM_-_Levalloiskern.jpg\">NHM &#8211; Levalloiskern<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Xenophon\">Wolfgang Sauber<\/a> (user: Xenophon) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is suggested that Neanderthal tools were used for a variety of purposes, including cutting, butchering, woodworking or antler working, and hide working. Additionally, because the Mousterian tools were lighter than previous stone tools, Neanderthals could <strong>haft<\/strong>, or attach the tool onto a handle, as the stone would not have been too heavy (Degano Et al. 2019). Neanderthals attached small stone blades onto short wood or antler handles to make knives or other small weapons, as well as attached larger blades onto longer shafts to make spears. New research examining tar-covered stones and black lumps at several Neanderthal sites in Europe suggests that Neanderthals may have been making tar by distilling it from birch tree bark, which could have been used to glue the stone tool onto its handle. If Neanderthals were, in fact, manufacturing tar to act as glue, this would predate modern humans in Africa using tree resin or similar adhesives by nearly 100,000 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evidence shows that raw materials used by Neanderthals came from distances as far away as 100 km. This could indicate a variety of things regarding Neanderthal behaviour, including a limited trade network with other Neanderthal groups or simply a large area scoured by Neanderthals when collecting raw materials. While research on specific applications continues, it should be clear from this brief discussion that Neanderthal tool manufacturing was much more complex than previous tool-making efforts, requiring technical expertise, patience, and skills beyond toolmaking to carry out.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Hunting and Diet<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">With their more sophisticated suite of tools and robust muscular bodies, Neanderthals were better armed for hunting than previous hominins. The animal remains in Neanderthal sites show that, unlike earlier Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals were very effective hunters who were able to kill their own prey, rather than relying on scavenging. Though more refined than the tools of earlier hominins, the Neanderthal spear was not the kind of weapon that would have been thrown; rather, it would have been used in a jabbing fashion (Churchill 1998; Kortlandt 2002). This may have required Neanderthals to hunt in groups rather than individually and made it necessary to approach their prey quite closely (Gaudzinski-Windheuser Et al. 2018). Remember, the animals living with Neanderthals were very large-bodied due to their adaptations to cold weather; this would have included species of deer, horses, and bovids (relatives of the cow).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Isotopes from Neanderthal bones show that meat was a significant component of their diet, similar to that seen in carnivores like wolves (Bocherens Et al. 1999; Jaouen Et al. 2019; Richards Et al. 2000). In addition to large prey, their diet included ibex, seals, rabbits, and pigeons. Though red meat was a critical component of the Neanderthal diet, evidence shows that at times they also ate limpets, mussels, and pine nuts. Tartar examined from Neanderthal teeth in Iraq and Belgium reveal that they also ate plant material including wheat, barley, date palms, and tubers, first cooking them to make them palatable (Henry Et al. 2010). While Neanderthals\u2019 diet varied according to the specific environment in which they lived, meat comprised up to 80% of their diet (Wi\u1e9ein Et al. 2015).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Caring for the Injured and Sick<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While the close-range style of hunting used by Neanderthals was effective, it also had some major consequences. Many Neanderthal skeletons have been found with significant injuries, which could have caused paralysis or severely limited their mobility. Many of the injuries are to the head, neck, or upper body. Thomas Berger and Erik Trinkaus (1995) conducted a statistical comparative analysis of Neanderthal injuries compared to those recorded in modern-day workers\u2019 compensation reports and found that the closest match was between Neanderthal injuries and those of rodeo workers. Rodeo professionals have a high rate of head and neck injuries that are similar to the Neanderthals\u2019 injuries. What do Neanderthals and rodeo workers have in common? They were both getting very close to large, strong animals, and at times their encounters went awry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The extensive injuries sustained by Neanderthals are evident in many fossil remains. Shanidar 1 (Figure 12.11), an adult male found at the Shanidar site in northern Iraq and dating to 45,000 ya, has a lifetime of injuries recorded in his bones (Stewart 1977). Shanidar 1 sustained\u2014and healed from\u2014an injury to the face that would have likely caused blindness. His lower right arm was missing and the right humerus shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. This pattern has been interpreted to indicate a substantial injury that required or otherwise resulted in amputation or wasting away of the lower arm. Additionally, Shanidar 1 suffered from bony growths in the inner ear that would have significantly impaired his hearing and severe arthritis in the feet. He also exhibited extensive anterior tooth wear, matching the pattern of wear found among modern populations who use their teeth as a tool. Rather than an anomaly, the type of injuries evident in Shanidar 1 are similar to those found in many other Neanderthal fossils, revealing injuries likely sustained from hunting large mammals as well as demonstrating a long life of physical activity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal skull.\" width=\"329\" height=\"329\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 330px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal right and left humerus. The right humerus is withered looking.\" width=\"330\" height=\"330\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.11a-b: a. The Shanidar 1 skull shows an injury to the face that would likely have caused blindness. b. The Shanidar 1 right humerus (on the left side of the image) shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/shanidar-1-skull-BH-050\">Homo neanderthalensis Shanidar 1 Skull<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/fossils\/shanidar-1\">Shanidar 1<\/a> by Chip Clark, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian Institution<\/a> [exhibit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\">Human Evolution <\/a>Evidence, Human Fossils, Species, Homo neanderthalensis] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The pattern of injuries is as significant as the fact that Shanidar 1 and other injured Neanderthals show evidence of having <em>survived<\/em> their severe injuries. One of the earliest-known Neanderthal discoveries\u2014the one on whom misinformed analysis shaped the stereotype of the species for nearly a century\u2014is the La Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal (Trinkaus 1985). The La Chapelle Neanderthal had a damaged eye orbit that likely caused blindness and suffered arthritis of the spine (Dawson and Trinkaus 1997). He had also lost most of his teeth, many of which he had lived without for so long that the mandibular and maxillary bones were partially reabsorbed due to lack of use. The La Chapelle Neanderthal was also thought to be at least in his mid-forties at death, an old age for the rough life of the Late Pleistocene\u2014giving rise to his nickname, \u201cthe Old Man.\u201d To have survived so long with so many injuries that obviously precluded successful large game hunting, he must have been taken care of by others. Such caretaking behaviour is also evident in the survival of other seriously injured Neanderthals, such as Shanidar 1. Long thought to be a hallmark modern human characteristic, taking care of the injured and elderly, for example preparing or pre-chewing food for those without teeth, indicates strong social ties among Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Ritual Life<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Such care practices may have been expressed upon death as well. Nearly complete Neanderthal skeletons are not uncommon in the fossil record, and most are well preserved within apparently deliberate burials that involve deep graves and bodies found in specific, often fetal or <strong>flexed positions<\/strong> (Harrold 1980)<strong>.<\/strong> Discoveries of pollen in a grave at the Shanidar site in the 1960s led scientists to think that perhaps Neanderthals had placed flowering plants in the grave, an indication of ritual ceremony or spirituality so common in modern humans. But more recent investigations have raised some doubt about this conclusion (Pomeroy Et al. 2020). The pollen may have been brought in by burrowing rodents. Claims of <strong>grave goods<\/strong> or other ornamentation in burials are similarly debated, although possible.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some tantalizing evidence for symbolism, and debatably, ritual, is the frequent occurrence of natural pigments, such as <strong>ochre<\/strong> (red) and manganese dioxide (black) in Neanderthal sites that could have been used for art. However, the actual uses of pigments are unclear, as there is very little evidence of art or paintings in Mousterian sites. One exception may be the recent discovery in Spain of a perforated shell that appears to be painted with an orange pigment, which may be evidence of Neanderthal art and jewelry. However, many pigments also have properties that make them good emulsifiers in adhesive (like for attaching a stone tool to a wooden handle) or useful in tanning hides. So the presence of pigment may or may not be associated with symbolic thought; however, it definitely does show a technological sophistication beyond that of earlier Archaic hominins.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Dig Deeper: Evidence of Endocannibalism Among the Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p>Krapina, a Neanderthal site in Croatia, has recently sparked new archeological discourse as many investigations upon fossilized remains show evidence of post-mortem modifications and manipulations of limbs and bones through the use of tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). These findings provide compelling evidence of Neanderthals engaging in cannibalism as part of their post-mortem practices. Additionally, these uncovered remains were found to have died of natural causes as opposed to being killed, showing that even the earliest humans may have had some sort of morality or ethics surrounding the cannibalizing of their kin, meaning they were aware of death in a social context as opposed to merely a physical one.<\/p>\n<p>While the original evidence in Krapina was uncovered in 1901, Croatian geologist and paleontologist Dragutin Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s discovery of fragmented and burned human bones (Ullrich, 2005) was not yet confirmed to be linked to endocannibalism until much later. Whereas the discovery of burned bones does not mean they were being prepared for consummation, due to its context among other findings, this information supports the hypothesis that early hominids conducted post-mortem rituals and practices with their dead. Building on Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s research, Herbert Ullrich wrote in <em>Anthropologie<\/em> (2005) that broken bones\u2014resulting from post-mortem bodily manipulations\u2014were \u201cdefleshed in preparation for secondary burial\u201d (2005, 251) and intentionally left outside rock shelters, while selectively chosen bones were seemingly brought inside for use in mortuary practices.<\/p>\n<p>For nearly 150 years, since the first Neanderthal skeletal remains were discovered, anthropologists and researchers have continued to debate the cognitive, social, and physical abilities of this species. In 2016, Rougier and colleagues wrote in <em>Scientific Reports<\/em>, furthering the research, presenting 99 new Neanderthal remains found in Goyet, Belgium. Among these remains, similar evidence of human-induced alterations was identified, including signs of butchering, consumption, and the use of bones to modify stone tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). This discovery provides significant support for the presence of cannibalistic behaviour among Northern European Neanderthals, contributing to the growing body of evidence that Neanderthals engaged with death in ways that reflect social awareness, ritual behaviour, and complex cultural practices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Contemporary Cases of Prion Disease Related to Endocannibalism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The evidence of endocannibalism does not end with early hominids; with Australian medical anthropologists recording thousands of cannibalism-related prion disease occurrences present in populations up until 2009 (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013). Following a mysterious epidemic of a new form of spongiform encephalopathy\u2013a \u201cprogressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system\u201d (2013, p.29)\u2013anthropological research regarding the the cultural mortuary rites within the Okapa region of Papua New Guinea have linked the newfound disease \u2018Kuru\u2019 to post-mortem consumption of human remains (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013; Collinge Et al., 2006).<\/p>\n<p>Local oral histories collected during the first investigations by these researchers in the 1950s traced the earliest cases back to the 1920s, with detailed case histories. Epidemiological data revealed a strong correlation between the spread of Kuru and participation in mortuary feasts, in which the deceased were ritually consumed as part of funerary rites (2006, p. 2070). From 1957 to 2004, over 2,700 cases were reported, with mortality peaking at over 200 deaths annually in the late 1950s (2006, p.2070); however, following the cessation of cannibalism in the easly 1960s due to governmental efforts, natural transmission of the disease has stopped, dropping the death toll dramatically, with the \u201clast three single cases reported in 2005, 2007, and 2009\u201d (Radford &amp; Scragg, p.48).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Lasting Gift of Neanderthals: Tantalizing New Directions for Resear<\/strong><strong>ch<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Examining the more recent time period in which Neanderthals lived and the extensive excavations completed across Europe allows for a much more complete archaeological record from this time period. Additionally, the increased cultural complexity such as complex tools and ritual behaviours expressed by Neanderthals left a more detailed record than previous hominins. Intentional burials enhanced preservation of the dead and potentially associated ritual behaviours. Such evidence allows for a more complete and nuanced picture of this species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 424px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-5.png\" alt=\"Museum exhibition of life-sized Neanderthal figure.\" width=\"424\" height=\"469\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.12: Artistic reconstruction of Neanderthal at The Natural History Museum in Vienna, Austria. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_neanderthalensis,_The_Natural_History_Museum_Vienna,_20210730_1223_1272.jpg\">Homo neanderthalensis, The Natural History Museum Vienna, 20210730 1223 1272<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Jakubhal\">Jakub Ha\u0142un<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Additional analyses are possible on many Neanderthal finds, due to increased preservation of bone, the amount of specimens that have been uncovered, and the recency in which Neanderthals lived. We should be cautious, however, to consider the potential bias of many Neanderthal sites. Overwhelmingly, Neanderthal skeletons are found complete, with injuries or evidence of disease in caves. Does this mean all Neanderthals lived a tough, disease-wrought life? Probably not. It does, however, indicate that the sick were cared for by others, and that they lived in environments that preserved their bodies incredibly well. These additional studies include the examination of dental calculus and even DNA analysis. While limited, samples of Neanderthal DNA have been successfully extracted and analysed. Research thus far has identified specific genetic markers that show some Neanderthals were light-skinned and probably red-haired with light eyes. Genetic analyses, different from the typical hominin reconstruction done with earlier species, allow scientists to further investigate soft tissue markers of Neanderthals and other more recent hominin species. These studies offer striking conclusions regarding Neanderthal traits, their physical appearance, and their culture, as reflected in these artists\u2019 reconstructions (Figure 12.12).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 258px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo in a blue suit and red tie.\" width=\"258\" height=\"368\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.13: Nobel Prize winner (2022) and pioneer in paleogenomic research, Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/2\/26\/Professor_Svante_Paabo_ForMemRS_%28cropped%29.jpg\">Professor Svante Paabo ForMemRS (cropped)<\/a> by Duncan.Hull is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo (Figure 12.13), of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, has been at the forefront of much of this new research, largely in the form of genomic studies (The Nobel Prize 2022). Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 2022, P\u00e4\u00e4bo is known primarily for his work with ancient DNA. He has successfully sequenced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as well as the entire Neanderthal genome from nuclear DNA. His genomic work has led to the realization that Denisovans are genetically distinct from Neanderthals, as well as the recent identification of a Neanderthal father and teenage daughter, which he discovered by looking for unique DNA markers in the fossil record. Additionally, P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s genomic work has provided researchers with additional lines of evidence regarding the connections between hominin fossils (such as Neanderthals) and modern people, their time of divergence, and current genetic overlap. The work of P\u00e4\u00e4bo has even formalized a new field of study within anthropology\u2014paleogenomics. To stay up to date with Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s work, be sure to follow his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">lab\u2019s website<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Communicating through Speech<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To successfully live in groups and to foster cultural innovations, Neanderthals would have required at least a basic form of communication in order to function, possibly using a speech-based communication system. The challenge with this line of research is that speech, of course, is not preserved, so indirect evidence must be used to support this conclusion. It is thought that Neanderthals would have possessed some basic speech, as evidenced from a variety of sources, including throat anatomy and genetic evidence (Lieberman 1971). There is only one bone in the human body that could demonstrate if a hominin was able to speak, or produce clear vocalizations like modern humans, and that is the hyoid, a U-shaped bone that is found in the throat and is associated with the ability to precisely control the vocal cords. Very few hyoid bones have been found in the archaeological record; however, a few have been uncovered in Neanderthal burials. The shape of the Neanderthal hyoid is nearly identical to that of modern humans, pointing to the likelihood that they had the same vocal capabilities as modern humans. In addition, geneticists have uncovered a mutation present in both modern humans and Neanderthals\u2014the FOXP2 gene\u2014that is possibly linked to the ability to speak. However, other scientists argue that we cannot make sweeping conclusions that the FOXP2 gene accounts for speech due to small sample size. Finally, scientists have also pointed to the increasingly complex cultural behaviour of Neanderthals as a sign that symbolic communication, likely through speech, would have been the only way to pass down the skills needed to make, for example, a Levallois blade or to position a body for intentional burial.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Intelligence<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the enduring questions about Neanderthals centres on their intelligence, specifically in comparison to modern humans. Brain volume indicates that Neanderthals certainly had a large brain, but it continues to be debated if Neanderthals were of equal intelligence to modern humans. Remember, creatures with larger body sizes tend to have larger brains; however, scaling of the brain is not always associated with greater intelligence (Alex 2018). Brain volume (cranial capacity), cultural complexity, tool use, and compassion toward their kind all point to an increase in intellect among Neanderthals when compared to previous hominins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Yet, new research is suggesting additional differences between Neanderthal brains and our own. For example, Euluned Pearce and colleagues (2013), from the University of Oxford, noted the frontal lobes of Neanderthals and modern humans are almost identical. However, Neanderthals had a larger visual cortex\u2014the portion of the brain involved in processing visual information. This would have left Neanderthals with less brain tissue for other functions, including those that would have aided them in dealing with large social groupings, one of the differences that has been suggested to exist between Neanderthals and modern humans. Other differences were found when geneticist John Blangero, from the Texas Biomedical Research Institute, compared data from the Neanderthal genome against data from modern study participants. Blangero and his colleagues (Blangero Et al. 2014) discovered that some Neanderthal brain components were very different, and smaller, than those in the modern sample. Differences were found in areas associated with the processing of information and controlling emotion and motivation, as well as overall brain connectivity. In short, as Blangero stated, \u201cNeanderthals were certainly cognitively adept,\u201d although their specific abilities may have differed from modern humans\u2019 in key areas (qtd. in Wong 2015). This point has been echoed in other recent genetic studies comparing Neanderthal and anatomically modern human brains (el-Showk 2019).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, scientists are fairly certain that Neanderthal brain development after birth was not the same as that of modern humans. After birth, anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>babies go through a critical period of brain expansion and cognitive development. It appears that Neanderthal babies\u2019 brains and bodies did not follow the same developmental pattern (Smith Et al. 2010; Zollikofer and Ponce de Le\u00f3n 2013). Modern humans enjoy an extended period of childhood, which allows children to engage in imaginative play and develop creativity that fosters cognitive skills. Neanderthals had a more limited childhood, with less development of the creative mind that may have affected their species\u2019 success (Nowell 2016).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The exact nature of Neanderthal intelligence remains under investigation, however. Some studies disagree with the idea that Neanderthal intelligence had limitations compared to our own, noting the extensive evidence of Neanderthals having limb asymmetry. Their tools also have wear marks indicating that they were hand-dominant. This is further supported by marks on Neanderthal teeth that demonstrate hand dominance. The Neanderthal \u201cstuff-and-cut method\u201d of eating, noted by David Frayer and colleagues (Frayer Et al. 2012), would have seen Neanderthals hold a piece of meat in their teeth, while pulling it taut with one hand, and then using the other hand, their dominant one, to cut the meat off of the larger slab being held in their teeth. When looking at 17 Neanderthals and their tooth wear, only two do not show markings associated with a right-hand dominant individual eating in this manner. Further, it has been established that favouring the right hand is a key marker between modern humans and chimpanzees, and that handedness also relates to language development, in the form of bilateral brain development. That Neanderthals likely were hand-dominant suggests they had an indicator of bilateral brain development and a precondition for human speech.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Middle Stone Age: Neanderthal Contemporaries in Africa<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals made their home on and adapted to the European and Asian continents, evidence of fossil humans in Africa show they were also adapting to their local environments. These populations in Africa exhibit many more similarities to modern humans than Neanderthals, as well as overall evolutionary success. While the African fossil sample size is smaller and more fragmentary than the number of Neanderthal specimens across Europe and Asia, the African sample is interesting in that it represents a longer time period and larger geographical area. This group of fossils\u2014often represented by the name \u201cMiddle Stone Age,\u201d or MSA\u2014dates to between 300,000 and 30,000 years ago across the entire continent of Africa. As with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, there is much variability seen in this African set of fossils. There are also a few key consistent elements: none of them exhibit Neanderthal skeletal features; instead, they demonstrate features that are increasingly consistent with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Similarities to Neanderthals and MSA contemporaries in Africa are seen, however, in their behavioural adaptations, including stone tools and other cultural elements. The tools associated with the specimens living in Africa during this time period are, like their physical features, varied. In some parts of Africa, namely Northern Africa, stone tools from this time so closely resemble Neanderthal tools that they are classified as Mousterian. In sub-Saharan Africa, the stone tools associated with these specimens are labeled as MSA. Some scholars argue that these could also be a type of Mousterian tools, but they are still typically subdivided based on geographical location.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recall that Mousterian tools were much more advanced than their Acheulean predecessors in terms of how the stone tools were manufactured, the quality of the stones used, and the ultimate use of the tools that were made. In addition, recent evidence suggests that MSA tools may also have been heat treated\u2014to improve the quality of the stone tool produced (Stolarczyk and Schmidt 2018). Evidence for heat treating is seen not only through advanced analysis of the tool itself but also through the residue of fires from this time period. Fire residues show a shift over time from small, short fires fuelled by grasses (probably intended for cooking) to larger, more intensive fires that required the exploitation of dry wood, exactly the type of fire that would have been needed for heat treating stone tools (Esteban Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other cultural elements seen with MSA specimens include the use of marine (sea-based) resources for their diet (Parkington 2003), manufacture of bone tools, use of adhesive and compound tools (e.g., hafted tools), shell bead production, engraving, use of pigments (such as ochre), and other more advanced tool-making technology (e.g., microlithics). While many of these cultural elements are also seen to a limited extent among Neanderthals, developments at MSA sites appear more complex. This MSA cultural expansion may have been a response to climate change or an increased use of language, complex communication, and\/or symbolic thought. Others have suggested that the MSA cultural expansion was due to the increase of marine resources in their diet, which included more fatty acids that may have aided their cognitive development. Still others have suggested that the increased cultural complexity was due to increased interaction among groups, which spurred competition to innovate. Recent studies suggest that perhaps the best explanation for the marked cultural complexity of MSA cultural artifacts is best explained by the simple fact that they lived in diverse habitats (Kandel Et al. 2015). This would have necessitated a unique set of cultural adaptations for each habitat type (for example, specialized marine tools would have been needed along coastal sites but not at inland locations). Simply put, the most useful adaptation of MSA was their flexibility of behaviour and adaptability to their local environment. As noted previously in this chapter, flexibility of behaviour and physical traits, rather than specialization, seems to be a feature that was favoured in hominin evolution at this time.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Where Did They Go? The End of Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While MSA specimens were increasingly successful and ultimately transitioned into modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record by around 40,000 years ago. What happened to them? We know, based on genetics, that modern humans come largely from the modern people who occupied Africa around 300,000 to 100,000 years ago, at the same time that Neanderthals were living in northern Europe and Asia. As you will learn in Chapter 13, modern humans expanded out of Africa around 150,000 years ago, rapidly entering areas of Europe and Asia inhabited by Neanderthals and other Archaic hominins. Despite intense interest and speculation in fictional works about possible interactions between these two groups, there is very little direct evidence of either peaceful coexistence or aggressive encounters. It is clear, though, that these two closely related hominins shared Europe for thousands of years, and recent DNA evidence suggests that they occasionally interbred (Fu Et al. 2015). Geneticists have found traces of Neanderthal DNA (as much as 1% to 4%) in modern humans of European and Asian descent not present in modern humans from sub-Saharan Africa. This is indicative of limited regional interbreeding with Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While some interbreeding likely occurred, as a whole, Neanderthals did not survive. What is the cause for their extinction? This question has fascinated many researchers and several theories have been suggested, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">At the time that Neanderthals were disappearing from the fossil record, the climate went through both cooling and warming periods\u2014each of which posed challenges for Neanderthal survival (Defleur and Desclaux 2019; Staubwasser Et al. 2018). It has been argued that as temperatures warmed, large-bodied animals, well adapted to cold weather, moved farther north to find colder environments or faced extinction. A shifting resource base could have been problematic for continued Neanderthal existence, especially as additional humans, in the form of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, began to appear in Europe and compete for a smaller pool of available resources.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the eruption of a European volcano 40,000 years ago could have put a strain on available plant resources (Golovanova Et al. 2010). The eruption would have greatly affected local microclimates, reducing the overall temperature enough to alter the growing season.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Possible differences in cognitive development may have limited Neanderthals in terms of their creative problem solving. As much as they were biologically specialized for their environment, the nature of their intelligence might not have offered them the creative problem-solving skills to innovate ways to adapt their culture when faced with a changing environment (Pearce Et al. 2013).<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">CRISPR gene-editing technology has been used in studies to evaluate potential differences between human and Neanderthal brains, based on differences in the genetic code. Potential differences include a Neanderthal propensity for mutations related to brain development that could account for more rapid brain development, maturation, synapse misfires, and less-orderly neural processes (Mora-Berm\u00fadez Et al. 2022; Trujillo Et al. 2021). Fundamental differences in brain function at the cellular level may account for the differential survival rates of Neanderthal and modern human populations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">There is evidence that suggests reproduction may have posed challenges for Neanderthals. Childbirth was thought to have been at least as difficult for female Neanderthals as anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Weaver and Hublin 2009). Female Neanderthals may have become sexually mature at an older age, even older than modern humans. This delayed maturation could have kept the Neanderthal population size small. A recent study has further suggested that male Neanderthals might have had a genetic marker on the Y chromosome that could have caused incompatibility between the fetus and mother during gestation; this would have had severe consequences for birth rate and survival (Mendez Et al. 2016). Even a small but continuous decrease in fertility would have been enough to result in the extinction of Neanderthals (Degioanni Et al. 2019).<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">As mentioned above, the end of Neanderthal existence overlaps with modern human expansion into northern Europe and Asia. There is no conclusive direct evidence to indicate that Neanderthals and modern humans lived peacefully side by side, nor that they engaged in warfare, but by studying modern societies and the tendencies of modern humans, it has been suggested that modern humans may not have warmly embraced their close but slightly odd-looking cousins when they first encountered them (Churchill Et al. 2009). Nevertheless, direct competition with modern humans for the same resources may have contributed to the Neanderthals\u2019 decline (Gilpin Et al. 2016); it may also have exposed them to new diseases, brought by modern humans (Houldcroft and Underdown 2016), which further decimated their population. Estimates of energy expenditures suggest Neanderthals had slightly higher caloric needs than modern humans (Venner 2018). When competing for similar resources, the slightly greater efficiency of modern humans might have helped them experience greater success in the face of competition\u2014at a cost to Neanderthals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the Neanderthal populations were fairly small to begin with (estimated between 5,000 and 70,000 individuals; Bocquet-Appel and Degioanni 2013), one or a combination of these factors could have easily led to their demise. As more research is conducted, we will likely get a better picture of exactly what led to Neanderthal extinction.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 353px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-4.png\" alt=\"Small fossilized finger bone sitting atop a chalk outline of hand bones.\" width=\"353\" height=\"235\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.14: Reproduction of Denisovan finger bone. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6f\/Denisova_Phalanx_distalis.jpg\">Denisova Phalanx distalis<\/a> (image from Museum of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium) by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals represent one regionally adapted branch of the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>family tree, recent discoveries in Siberia and the Tibetan Plateau surprised paleoanthropologists by revealing yet another population that was contemporary with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals, and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The genetic analysis of a child\u2019s finger bone (Figure 12.14) and an adult upper third molar (Figure 12.15) from Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia by a team including Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo discovered that the mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences reflected distinct genetic differences from all known Archaic populations. Dubbed \u201cDenisovans\u201d after the cave in which the bones were found, this population is more closely related to Neanderthals than modern humans, suggesting the two groups shared an ancestor who split from modern humans first, then the Neanderthal-Denisovan line diverged more recently (Reich Et al. 2010).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 227px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-4-1.png\" alt=\"Molar tooth with wear, large surface area, and large roots.\" width=\"227\" height=\"341\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.15: Reproduction of Denisovan molar. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Denisova_Molar.jpg\">Denisova Molar<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans share up to 5% of their DNA with modern Melanesians, aboriginal Australians, and Polynesians, and 0.2% of their DNA with other modern Asian populations and Native Americans. Additional studies have suggested one (Vernot Et al. 2018) or two (Browning Et al. 2018) separate points of time when interbreeding occurred between modern humans and Denisovans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic analysis reveals that Denisovans (potentially three distinct populations) had adaptations for life at high altitudes that prevented them from developing altitude sickness and hypoxia in extreme environments such as Tibet, where the average annual temperature is close to 0\u2103 and the altitude is more than a kilometre (about 4,000 feet) above sea level. Through protein analysis of a jawbone, one study (Chen Et al. 2019) has placed Denisovans in Tibet as early as 160,000 years ago. Genetic evidence of interbreeding has linked modern Tibetan populations with Denisovans 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, which implies that the unique high-altitude adaptations seen in modern Tibetans may have originated with Denisovans (Huerta-Sanchez Et al. 2014).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other research suggests tantalizing new directions regarding Denisovans. Stone tools similar to those found in Siberia have been uncovered in the Tibetan plateau suggesting a connection between the Denisovan populations in those two areas (Zhang Et al. 2018). The molar of a young girl, possibly Denisovan, has been found in Laos and shows strong similarities to specimens from China (Demeter Et al. 2022). And DNA sequencing from discoveries in the Denisova Cave have yielded a genome that has been interpreted as the first-generation offspring of a Denisovan father and Neanderthal mother (Slon Et al. 2018). While this research is not yet conclusive and is still being interpreted, exciting new possibilities are being revealed. To stay up-to-date with new discoveries, consider following organizations such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian\u2019s Human Origins Program<\/a> on social media.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Pleistocene Hominins in East Asia: Homo longi and Yunxian<\/h2>\n<p>New fossil discoveries, along with advanced molecular analysis, are prompting re-evaluations of the complex evolutionary dynamics of non-sapiens Homo in the middle-late Pleistocene.<\/p>\n<h3>Homo longi<\/h3>\n<p>The Harbin cranium, often referred to as Homo longi, represents one of the most remarkable Middle Pleistocene human fossils discovered in East Asia. It is currently carbon-dated at 146 ka, allowing recent scholarship to use the Harbin cranium to argue for a distinct clade of hominins that evolved independently in Eastern Asia, separate from Neanderthals and modern humans (Ni et al., 2021). This clade is argued to include Dali, Jinniushan, Hualongdong, Xiahe, and Harbin, based on phylogenetic analyses using parsimony criteria and Bayesian tip-dating, forming a third East Asian lineage and a sister group to the Homo sapiens lineage.<\/p>\n<p>The Harbin cranium exhibits a unique combination of traits, likely representing a species of Homo distinct from other Middle-to-Late Pleistocene taxa, including H. sapiens, H. Neanderthalensis, and H. Heidelbergensis\/H. Rhodesiensis. Its overall size is exceptional, setting it apart from nearly all other known fossils; however, the proportions of the cranial vault align closely with those of other large late archaic Homo species, with an estimated brain volume of approximately 1,420 mL. Despite its considerable breadth, the face is relatively low in height and exhibits a zygomaxillary shape similar to that seen in H. sapiens and H. antecessor, a feature also observed in other Middle Pleistocene Chinese fossils from Dali and Jinniushan. Additionally, the face is attached to the braincase with reduced prognathism, forming a more perpendicular angle as in modern humans, in contrast to the pronounced midfacial prognathism of Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<h3>Yunxian, China: Possible cladistic origins<\/h3>\n<p>In 2025, researchers released findings that expanded the diversity and relationships of Homo lineages in the Pleistocene, based on an analysis of fossils found in 1989\/90. Two skull fossils were found near the Hanjiang River in Hubei province, China, and were named the Yunxian 1 and Yunxian 2 crania\u2014A third cranium has recently been discovered in the same sediment layer as the two previous finds (Tu et al., 2026). The first 2 specimens were in poor condition, fragmented and distorted; however, using recently developed techniques such as high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans, image segmentation, and digital repositioning of fragments, the researchers incorporated elements from the Yunxian 1 crania with the less damaged Yunxian 2 cranium. The Yunxian 2 cranium is a mosaic of primitive and derived traits. It retains ancient characteristics seen in earlier hominins, a thick supraorbital torus, a broad palate, a long and low vault in lateral view, and a receding frontal contour; its frontal lobe remains low and narrow, similar to H. erectus fossils. Conversely, it lacks the strongly angulated occipital bone found in H. erectus as well as the protruding occipital region or central suprainiac fossa typical of Neanderthals. The big surprise is that the zygomaxillary region is transversely flat and faces anteriorly, a feature comparable to the Hualongdong and Harbin fossils and even H. sapiens. This intermediate morphology places Yunxian 2 in a distinct position, linking archaics like H. erectus with later Asian hominins such as Harbin, Dali, and Jinniushan. Phylogenetic and morphometric analyses confirm that Yunxian 2 represents an early member of the Asian H.longi Clade. The reconstructed Yunxian 2 cranium represents a major achievement in paleoanthropology, digitally restoring a badly damaged fossil from beyond the Middle Pleistocene. In fact, recent discussion suggests an even earlier date for the Yunxian fossils at approximately 1.77 Ma (Tu et al., 2026). In their analysis, they identify the Yunxian fossils as H.erectus, and the site as Early Pleistocene. Over 500 artifacts have been recovered from the site (cores, choppers, and flakes) typical of the Early Paleolithic. Nevertheless, the mosaic morphology of the Yunxian skulls reveals characteristics within the range of both H. erectus and the Harbin skull (among others), which may position these finds as being very close to the origins and diversification of the longi clade, as well as preserving transitional features close to the sapiens clade\u00a0 (Feng et al., 2025, p.1323).<\/p>\n<p>The expanding fossil and genomic record of Archaic Homo has profoundly reshaped our understanding of Pleistocene human evolution. Discoveries, from an increasing variety of fossils found in eastern Asia, to advances in genomic research, demonstrate that multiple contemporaneous lineages once coexisted, interacted, diverged and, at times, interbred. These findings challenge earlier linear models of human ancestry and instead point to a dynamic evolutionary landscape marked by regional diversification, intermittent contact, and complex patterns of gene flow.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">How Do These Fit In? <em>Homo naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo floresiensis<br \/>\n<\/em><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recently, some fossils have been unearthed that have challenged our understanding of the hominin lineage. The fossils of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are significant for several reasons but are mostly known for how they don\u2019t fit the previously held patterns of hominin evolution. While we examine information about these species, we ask you to consider the evidence presented in this chapter and others to draw your own conclusions regarding the significance and placement of these two unusual fossil species in the hominin lineage.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>naledi<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 347px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-5.png\" alt=\"A nearly complete skeleton surrounded by off-white bone fragments on a black table.\" width=\"347\" height=\"390\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.16: A sample of some of the 1,550 bones found representing Homo naledi. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560#fig1\">Dinaledi skeletal specimens (Figure 1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560\">Berger et al. 2015<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 2013 recreational spelunkers uncovered a collection of bones deep in a cave network in Johannesburg, South Africa. The cave system, known as Rising Star, had been well documented by other cavers; however, it appears few people had ever gone as far into the cave as these spelunkers did. Lee Berger, paleoanthropologist at University of Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg, immediately put out a call for what he termed \u201cunderground astronauts\u201d to begin recovery and excavation of the fossil materials. Unlike other excavations, Berger and most other paleoanthropologists would not be able to access the elusive site, as it was incredibly difficult to reach, and at some points there was only eight inches of space through which to navigate. The underground astronauts, all petite women anthropologists, were the only ones who were able to access this remarkable site. Armed with small excavation tools and a video camera, which streamed the footage up to the rest of the team at the surface, the team worked together and uncovered a total of 1,550 bones, representing at least 15 individuals, as seen in Figure 12.16. Later, an additional 131 bones, including an almost-complete cranium, were found in a nearby chamber of the cave, representing three more individuals (Figure 12.17). Berger called in a team of specialists to participate in what was dubbed \u201cPaleoanthropology Summer Camp.\u201d Each researcher specialized in a different portion of the hominin skeleton. With various specialists working simultaneously, more rapid analysis was possible of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> than most fossil discoveries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 534px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of four different views of the LES1 Homo naledi skull set against a black background.\" width=\"534\" height=\"599\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.17: Several angles of the nearly complete LES1 Homo naledi skull. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232#fig5\">LES1 Cranium (Figure 5)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232\">Hawks et al. 2017<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While access to the site, approximately 80 m from any known cave entrance or opening, was treacherous for researchers, it must have been difficult for <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> as well. The route included moving through a portion that is just 25 cm wide at some points, known as \u201cSuperman\u2019s Crawl.\u201d The only way to get through this section is by crawling on your stomach with one arm by your side and the other raised above your head. Past Superman\u2019s Crawl, a jagged wall known as the Dragon\u2019s Back would have been very difficult to traverse. Below that, a narrow vertical chute would have eventually led down to the area where the fossils were discovered. While geology changes over time and the cave system likely has undergone its fair share, it is not likely that these features arose after <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> lived (Dirks Et al. 2017). This has made scientists curious as to how the bones ended up in the bottom of the cave system in the first place. It has been suggested that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> deposited the bones there, one way or another. If <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> did deposit the bones, either through random disposal or intentional burial, this raises questions regarding their symbolic behaviour and other cultural traits, including the use of fire, to access a very dark cave system. Another competing idea is that a few individuals may have entered the cave system to escape a predator and then got stuck. To account for the sheer number of fossils, this would have had to happen multiple times.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The features of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> are well-documented due to the fairly large sample, which represents individuals of all sexes and a wide range of ages. The skull shape and features are very much like other members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>\u2014including a sagittal keel and large brow, like <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a well-developed frontal lobe, similar to modern humans\u2014yet the brain size is significantly smaller than its counterparts, at approximately 500 cc (560 cc for males and 465 cc for females). The teeth also exhibit features of later members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>, such as Neanderthals, including a reduction in overall tooth size. <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> also had unique shoulder anatomy and curved fingers, indicating similarities to tree-dwelling primates, which is very different from any other hominin yet found. Perhaps the greatest shock of all is that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> has been dated to 335,000 to 236,000 years ago, placing it as a contemporary to modern <em>Homo sapiens,<\/em> despite its very primitive features. An additional specimen of a child, found in 2021, not only shares many of the unique features found in the adult specimen but will also add insight into the growth and development of individuals of this species (Brophy Et al. 2021).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>floresiensis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In a small cave called Liang Bua, on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, a small collection of fossils were discovered beginning in 2003 (Figure 12.18). The fossil fragments represent as many as nine individuals, including a nearly complete female skeleton. The features of the skull are very similar to that of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, including the presence of a sagittal keel, an arching brow ridges and nuchal torus, and the lack of a chin (Figure 12.19). <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>, as the new species is called, had a brain size that was remarkably small at 400 cc, and recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 606px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-3.png\" alt=\"View from inside a large cave with people standing near a dug-out square of dirt.\" width=\"606\" height=\"403\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.18: Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, where a collection of Homo floresiensis specimens were discovered. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_floresiensis_cave.jpg\">Homo floresiensis cave<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/84301190@N00\">Rosino<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 584px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-5.png\" alt=\"Photograph of a gray and off-white cast Homo floresiensis skull.\" width=\"584\" height=\"584\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.19: Homo floresiensis had a brain that was remarkably small at 400 cc. Recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates Homo erectus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-floresiensis-skull-BH-033-2\">Homo floresiensis Skull (Flores Skull LB1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The complete female skeleton, who was an adult, was approximately a metre tall and would have weighed just under 30 kg, which is significantly shorter and just a few kilograms more than the average, modern, young elementary-aged child. A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> can be seen in Figure 12.20. The small size of the fossil has earned the species the nickname \u201cthe Hobbit.\u201d Many questions have been asked about the stature of this species, as all of the specimens found also show evidence of diminutive stature and small brain size. Some explanations include pathology; however, this seems unlikely as all fossils found thus far demonstrate the same pattern. Another possible explanation lies in a biological phenomena seen in other animal species also found on the island, which date to a similar time period. This phenomenon, called <strong>insular dwarfing<\/strong>, is due to limited food resources on an island, which can create a selective pressure for large-bodied species to be selected for smaller size, as an island would not have been able to support their larger-bodied cousins for a long period of time. This phenomenon is the cause of other unique species known to have lived on the island at the same time, including the miniature stegodon, a dwarf elephant species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 448px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-4.png\" alt=\"Black-and-white drawing of a large nude woman and a much smaller man.\" width=\"448\" height=\"611\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.20: A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis. As an adult, Homo floresiensis was approximately 1 metre tall and would have weighed under 30 kg. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis (Figure 11.19)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is ongoing research and debate regarding <em>Homo floresiensis<\/em>\u2019 dates of existence, with some researchers concluding that they lived on Flores until perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago, although they are more often dated to 100,000 to 60,000 years ago. Stone tools from that time period uncovered at the site are similar to other hominin stone tools found on the island of Flores. <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have hunted a wide range of animals, including the miniature stegodon, giant rats, and other large rodents. Other animals on the island that could have threatened them include the giant komodo dragon. An interesting note about this island chain is that ancestors of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have had to traverse the open ocean in order to get there, as the nearest island is almost 10 km away, and there is little evidence to support that a land bridge connecting mainland Asia or Australia to the island would have been present. This separation from the mainland would also have limited the number of other animals, including predators and human species, that would have had access to the island. Anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> arrived on the island around 30,000 years ago and, if some researchers\u2019 later dates for <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are correct, both species may have lived on Flores at the same time. The modern population living on the island of Flores today believes that their ancestors came from the Liang Bua cave; however, recent genetic studies have determined they are not related to <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> (Tucci Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Cultural Connections and Contemporary Implications<\/h2>\n<p>The Neanderthals provide an important example of how biological and cultural adaptations cannot always be understood separately. Their large brains and robust, cold-adapted bodies came with significant energetic demands, creating biological challenges that could be addressed through cultural practices. Hunting, tool use, food processing, fire, clothing, and shelter were not simply behaviours that existed alongside their biology; they allowed Neanderthals to respond to the environment and the physiological demands placed on their bodies. In this sense, culture became another means through which Neanderthals adapted to their environment.<\/p>\n<p>Their social behaviours further complicate the distinction between biological survival and cultural adaptation. Evidence of care for injured or vulnerable individuals and intentional burial suggests that their social lives extended beyond immediate individual survival. These social interactions demonstrate that adaptation was not simply a matter of being biologically suited to an environment, but also involved relationships, shared practices, and forms of social care. Although the meaning of these behaviours cannot be fully reconstructed, they challenge the simplistic image of archaic humans as primitive or solely driven by biological instincts.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, Neanderthals demonstrate that human adaptation is neither exclusively biological nor exclusively cultural. Their bodies were shaped by the environments in which they lived, while their cultural practices allowed them to navigate and modify those environments. Looking at Neanderthals through a biocultural perspective therefore moves us beyond the idea of the \u201ccaveman\u201d and instead recognizes them as hominins whose survival emerged through the interaction of physiology, environment, technology, and social life.<\/p>\n<h4>Discussion questions<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Why might caring for the sick and injured and practicing burial rites be considered evidence of culture? What do these behaviours reveal about social life?<\/li>\n<li>Can you think of an example of the intertwining of biology and culture in humans today? What does this example reveal about the relationship between biological and cultural adaptation?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summaries<\/span><\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u2013200,000 years ago (although some regional variation)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Africa, Europe, and Asia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Broken Hill (Zambia), Atapuerca (Spain)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth in back of mouth, larger front teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging forehead, no chin, projecting occipital region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Varied regionally, but some continue to use Acheulean handaxe, others adopt Mousterian tool culture<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lots of regional variation in this species<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">335,000\u2013236,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">South Africa<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rising Star Cave<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced tooth size<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, large brow, well-developed frontal region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Suspensory shoulder<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">150,000\u201340,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Western Europe, Middle East, and Western Asia only<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Shanidar (Iraq), La Chapelle-aux-Saints (France)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Retromolar gap<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge, midfacial prognathism, large infraorbital foramina, occipital bun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton with short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel chest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mousterian tools often constructed using the Levallois technique<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201360,000 years ago, perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Liang Bua, island of Flores, Indonesia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cThe Hobbit\u201d<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">400 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, arching brow ridges, nuchal torus, no chin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Very short stature (approximately 3.5 ft.)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tools similar to other tools found on the island of Flores<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201330,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Siberia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Child\u2019s finger bone and adult molar<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large molars (from limited evidence)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Closely related to Neanderthals (genetically)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Research presented in the chapter contributes to why scientists have taken to nicknaming this time period \u201cthe muddle in the middle.\u201d We know that the Middle Pleistocene picks up from <em>Homo erectus <\/em>and ends with the appearance of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. While the start and the end are clear, it\u2019s the middle that is messy. As more research is conducted and more data is collected, rather than clarifying our understanding of the hominin lineage during this time period, it only inspires more questions, particularly about the relationships between hominins during this time period, including the oft-misunderstood Neanderthal. Research is painting a more detailed picture of Neanderthal intelligence and both biological and behavioural adaptations. At the same time, their relationship to other Middle Pleistocene hominins, including Denisovans, as well as modern humans, remains unclear.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo<\/em> <em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are clear outliers when compared to their contemporary hominin species. Each has surprised paleoanthropologists for both their archaic traits in relatively modern times and their unique combination of traits seen in archaic species and modern humans. While these finds have been exciting, they have also completely upended the assumed trajectory of the human lineage, causing scientists to re-examine assumptions about hominin evolution and what it means to be modern. Add this to the developments being made using ancient DNA, other new fossil discoveries, and other innovations in paleoanthropology, and you see that our understanding of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and others living during this time period is rapidly developing and changing. This is a true testament to the nature of science and the scientific method.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clearly, hominins of the Middle Pleistocene are distinct from our species today. Yet, understanding the hominins that directly preceded our species and clarifying the evolutionary relationships between us is important to better understanding our own place in nature.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What physical and cultural features are unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>? How are Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> different in both physical and cultural characteristics from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\n<li>Describe the specific changes to the brain and skull first seen in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>. Why does the shape of the skull change so dramatically from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\n<li>What role did the shifting environment play in the adaptation of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals? Discuss at least one physical feature and one cultural feature that would have assisted these groups in surviving the changing environment.<\/li>\n<li>What does the regional variation in Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> represent in terms of the broader story of our species\u2019 evolution?<\/li>\n<li>Describe the issues raised by the discoveries of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> in the understanding of the story of the evolution of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p><strong>Allele<\/strong>: Each of two or more alternative forms of a gene that arise by mutation and are found at the same place on a chromosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anthropocentrism<\/strong>: A way of thinking that assumes humans are the most important species and leads to interpreting the world always through a human lens. Species-centric science and thought.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cortex<\/strong>: The outside, or rough outer covering, of a rock. Usually the cortex is removed during the process of stone tool creation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethnocentric<\/strong>: Applying negative judgments to other cultures based on comparison to one\u2019s own.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exogenous DNA<\/strong>: DNA that originates from sources outside of the specimen you are trying to sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Flexed position<\/strong>: Fetal position, in which the legs are drawn up to the middle of the body and the arms are drawn toward the body centre. Intentional burials are often found in the flexed body position.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraminifera<\/strong>: Microscopic single-celled organisms with a shell that are common in all marine environments. The fossil record of foraminifera extends back well over 500 million years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Glaciation<\/strong>: A glacial period, or time when a large portion of the world is covered by glaciers and ice sheets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globular<\/strong>: Round-shaped, like a globe.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grave goods<\/strong>: Items included with a body at burial. Items may signify occupation or hobbies, social status, or level of importance in the community, or they may be items believed necessary for the afterlife.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Haft<\/strong>: A handle. Also used as a verb\u2014to attach a handle to an item, such as a stone tool.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Infraorbital foramina<\/strong>: Small holes on the maxilla bone of the face that allows nerves and blood to reach the skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insular dwarfing<\/strong>: A form of dwarfism that occurs when a limited geographic region, such as an island, causes a large-bodied animal to be selected for a smaller body size.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interglacial<\/strong>: A warmer period between two glacial time periods.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Levallois technique<\/strong>: A distinctive technique of stone tool manufacturing used by Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals. The technique involves the preparation of a core and striking edges off in a regular fashion around the core. Then a series of similarly sized pieces can be removed, which can then be turned into different tools.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Midfacial prognathism<\/strong>: A forward projection of the nose or the middle facial region. Usually associated with Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong>: The stone tool industry of Neanderthals and their contemporaries in Africa and Western Asia. Mousterian tools are known for a diverse set of flake tools, which is different from the large bifacial tools of the Acheulean industry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal aperture<\/strong>: The opening for the nose visible on a skull. Often pear- or heart-shaped.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital bun<\/strong>: A prominent bulge or projection on the back of the skull, specifically the occipital bone. This is a feature present only on Neanderthal skulls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ochre<\/strong>: A natural clay pigment mixed with ferric oxide and clay and sand. Ranges in colour from brown to red to orange.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retracted face<\/strong>: A face that is flatter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retromolar gap<\/strong>: A space behind the last molar and the end of the jaw. This is a feature present only on Neanderthals. It also occurs through cultural modification in modern humans who have had their third molars, or wisdom teeth, removed.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnh.org\/exhibitions\/permanent-exhibitions\/anne-and-bernard-spitzer-hall-of-human-origins\">Anne and Bernard Spitzer Hall of Human Origins<\/a>\u2014American Museum of Natural History.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDawn of Humanity,\u201d PBS documentary, 2015<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ted.com\/talks\/svante_paeaebo_dna_clues_to_our_inner_neanderthal?language=en\">\u201cDNA Clues to Our Inner Neanderthal,\u201d<\/a> TED Talk by Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo, 2011.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Dirt\u201d Podcast, Episode 30, <a href=\"https:\/\/thedirtpod.com\/episodes\/\/episode-30-the-human-family-tree-shrub-crabgrass-tumbleweed-part-3\">\u201cThe Human Family Tree (Shrub? Crabgrass? Tumbleweed?), Part 3: Very Humany Indeed\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/page\/games-and-activities\">eFossil Games and Activities<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Frank, Rebecca. 2021. \u201cThe Genus Homo.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual, <\/em><\/a>edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\/asian-research-projects\/hobbits-flores-indonesia.\">Hobbits on Flores, Indonesia<\/a> &#8211; Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/evolution.berkeley.edu\/evo-news\/lumping-or-splitting-in-the-fossil-record\/\">Lumping or Splitting in the Fossil Record<\/a> &#8211; UC Berkeley Understanding Evolution.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">Neandertals and More<\/a> &#8211; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sapiens.org\/biology\/neanderthal-anatomy\/?fbclid=IwAR2Bcff1GVkTLnbCR58JAWiJzkk-Ell7zL0FUddf1HNAX6RDAZxbqh1zWoI\">Neanderthals: Body of Evidence<\/a> &#8211; SAPIENS.<\/p>\n<p>Perash, Rose L., and Kristen A. Broehl. 2021. \u201cHominin Review: Evolutionary Trends.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p>Perkl, Bradley. \u201cBrain, Language, Lithics.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by<em>.<\/em> Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. CC BY-NC. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/shanidar-3-neanderthal-skeleton\">Shanidar 3 &#8211; Neanderthal Skeleton<\/a> &#8211; Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/species\">Species<\/a> &#8211; Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian Human Origins Program Facebook page<\/a> (@smithsonian.humanorigins).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.smithsonianmag.com\/science-nature\/bringing-human-evolution-life-180951155\/\">Paleoartist Brings Human Evolution to Life<\/a> &#8211; Elisabeth Dayn\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p>Ackermann, Rebecca R., Matthew L. Arnold, et al. \u201cHybridization in Human Evolution: Insights from Other Organisms.\u201d Evolutionary Anthropology 28, no. 4 (July 2019): 189\u2013209. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21787\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21787<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6980311\/\">https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC6980311\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Adler, Daniel S., Timothy J. Prindiville, and Nicholas J. Conard. 2003. \u201cPatterns of Spatial Organization and Land Use During the Eemian Interglacial in the Rhineland: New Data from Wallertheim, Germany.\u201d Eurasian Prehistory 1(2): 25\u201378.<\/p>\n<p>Ahlquist, K. D., Mayra M. Ba\u00f1uelos, Alyssa Funk, et al. \u201cOur Tangled Family Tree: New Genomic Methods Offer Insight into the Legacy of Archaic Admixture.\u201d Genome Biology and Evolution 13, no. 7 (July 2021): evab115. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/gbe\/evab115\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/gbe\/evab115<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/gbe\/article\/13\/7\/evab115\/6283580\">https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/gbe\/article\/13\/7\/evab115\/6283580<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alex, Bridget. 2018. \u201cNeanderthal Brains: Bigger, Not Necessarily Better.\u201d Discover, September 21, 2018. <a class=\"rId115\" href=\"https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better\">https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ashton, Nick M. 2002. \u201cAbsence of Humans in Britain during the Last Interglacial Period (Oxygen Isotope Stage 5e).\u201d <em>Publications du CERP<\/em> 8: 93\u2013103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Lee R., John Hawks, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Lucas K. Delezene, Tracy L. Kivell, et al. 2015. \u201c<em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em>, a New Species of the Genus <em>Homo<\/em> from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 4:e09560. <a class=\"rId116\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId117\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">10.7554\/eLife.09560<\/a><a class=\"rId118\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Thomas D., and Erik Trinkaus. 1995. \u201cPatterns of Trauma among the Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>22 (6): 841\u2013852.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blangero, J., E.E. Quillen, M.A. Almeida, D.R. McKay, J.M. Peralta, S. Williams-Blangero, J.E. Curran, R. Duggirala, D.C. Glahn. 2014. \u201cGenomic Reconstruction of Neandertal Brain Structure and Function.\u201d Paper presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 12 April 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocherens, Herv\u00e9, Daniel Billiou, Andr\u00e9 Mariotti, Maryl\u00e8ne Patou-Mathis, Marcel Otte, Dominique Bonjean, and Michel Toussaint. 1999. \u201cPalaeoenvionmental and Palaeodietary Implications of Isotopic Biogeochemistry of Last Interglacial Neanderthal and Mammal Bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium).\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 26 (6): 599\u2013607.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre and Anna Degioanni. 2013. \u201cNeanderthal Demographic Estimates.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 54 (S8): S202\u2013S213.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Boettger, Tatjana, Elena Yu. Novenko, Andrej A. Velichko, Olga K. Borisova, Konstantin V. Kremenetski, Stefan Knetsch, and Frank W. Junge. 2009. \u201cInstability of Climate and Vegetation Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe during the Final Stage of the Last Interglacial (Eemian, Mikulino) and Early Glaciation.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 207 (1-2): 137\u2013144. <a class=\"rId119\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId120\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Brophy, Juliet K., Marina C. Elliott, Darryl J. De Ruiter, Debra R. Bolter, Steven E. Churchill, Christopher S. Walker, John Hawks, and Lee R. Berger. 2021. \u201cImmature Hominin Craniodental Remains from a New Locality in the Rising Star Cave System, South Africa.\u201d <em>PaleoAnthropology <\/em>1: 1\u201314. <a class=\"rId121\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId122\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Browning, Sharon R., Brian L. Browning, Ying Zhou, Serena Tucci, and Josh M. Akey. 2018. \u201cAnalysis of Human Sequence Data Reveals Two Pulses of Archaic Denisovan Admixture.\u201d <em>Cell<\/em> 173 (1): 53\u201361.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chen, Fahu, Frido Welker, Chuan-Chou Shen, Shara E. Bailey, Inga Bergmann, Simon Davis, Huan Xia, et al. 2019. \u201cA Late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Mandible from the Tibetan Plateau.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 569: 409\u2013412. <a class=\"rId123\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 1998. \u201cCold Adaptations, Heterochrony, and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 7 (2): 46\u201360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 2006. \u201cBioenergetic Perspective on Neanderthal Thermoregulatory and Activity Budgets.\u201d In <em>Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches and Perspectives<\/em>, edited by K. Havarti and T. Harrison, pp. 113\u2013134. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E., Robert G. Franciscus, Hilary A. McKean-Peraza, Julie A. Daniel, and Brittany R. Warren. 2009. \u201cShanidar 3 Neanderthal Rib Puncture Wound and Paleolithic Weaponry.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 57 (2): 163\u2013178.<\/p>\n<p>Collinge, J., Whitfield, J., McKintosh, E., Beck, J., Mead, S., Thomas, D. J., &amp; Alpers, M. P. (2006). Kuru in the 21st century&#8211;an acquired human prion disease with very long incubation periods. <em>Lancet (London, England)<\/em>, 367(9528), 2068\u20132074. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cook, Rebecca W., Antonio Vazzana, Rita Sorrentino, Stefano Benazzi, Amanda L. Smith, David S. Strait, and Justin A. Ledogar. 2021. \u201cThe Cranial Biomechanics and Feeding Performance of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Interface Focus<\/em> 11 (5). <a class=\"rId124\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId125\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dawson, James E., and Erik Trinkaus. 1997. \u201cVertebral Osteoarthritis of La Chapelle-Aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>24 (11): 1015-1021. <a class=\"rId126\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Defleur, Alban R., and Emmanuel Desclaux. 2019. \u201cImpact of the Last Interglacial Climate Change on Ecosystems and Neanderthals Behavior at Baume Moula-Guercy, Ard\u00e8che, France.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 104: 114\u2013124. <a class=\"rId127\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degano, Ilaria, Sylvain Soriano, Paola Villa, Luca Pollarolo, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Zenobia Jacobs, Katerina Douka, Silvana Vitagliano, and Carlo Tozzi. 2019. \u201cHafting of Middle Paleolithic Tools in Latium (Central Italy): New Data from Fossellone and Sant\u2019Agostino Caves.\u201d <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14(10): 1\u201329. <a class=\"rId128\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId129\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degioanni Anna, Chritophe Bonenfant, Sandrine Cabut, and Silvana Condemi. 2019. Living on the Edge: Was Demographic Weakness the Cause of Neanderthal Demise? <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14 (5): e0216742.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId130\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId131\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Delpiano, Davide, Kristin Heasley, and Marci Peresani. 2018. \u201cAssessing Neanderthal Land Use and Lithic Raw Material Management in Discoid Technology.\u201d <em>Journal of Anthropological Sciences<\/em> 96: 89\u2013110. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">10.4436\/jass.96006.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Demeter, Fabrice, Cl\u00e9ment Zanolli, Kira E. Westaway, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Phillippe Duringer, Mike W. Morley, Frido Welker, et al. 2022. \u201cA Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Molar from the Annamite Chain of Northern Laos.\u201d <em>Nature Communications<\/em> 13 (1): 2557. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dirks, Paul H. G. M., Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, Jan D. Kramers, John Hawks, Anthony Dosseto, Mathieu Duval, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Age of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and Associated Sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>eLife<\/em> 6: e24231. <a class=\"rId135\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId136\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">10.7554\/eLife.24231. <\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">el-Showk, Sedeer. 2019. \u201cNeanderthal Clues to Brain Evolution in Humans.\u201d Nature 571: S10\u2013S11. <a class=\"rId137\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">10.1038\/<\/a><a class=\"rId139\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">d41586-019-02210-6<\/a><a class=\"rId140\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Esteban, Irene, Curtis W. Marean, Erich C. Fisher, Panagiotis Karkanas, Dan Carbanes, and Rosa M. Albert. 2018. \u201cPhytoliths as an Indicator of Early Modern Humans\u2019 Plant-Gathering Strategies, Fire, Fuel, and Site-Occupation Intensity During the Middle Stone Age at Pinnacle Point 5-6 (South Coast, South Africa).\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (6): 1\u201333.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evteev, Andrej A., Alla A. Movsesian, and Alexandra N. Grosheva. 2017. \u201cThe Association between Mid-facial Morphology and Climate in Northeast Europe Differs from That in North Asia: Implications for Understanding the Morphology of Late Pleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 107: 36\u201348. <a class=\"rId141\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Feng, Xiaobo, Qiyu Yin, Feng Gao, et al. \u201cThe Phylogenetic Position of the Yunxian Cranium Elucidates the Origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans.\u201d Science 389 (2025): 1320\u20131324. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.ado9202\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.ado9202<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Frayer, David W., Marina Lozano, Jose M. Bermudez de Castro, Eudald Carbonell, Juan-Luis Arsuaga, Jakov Radovcic, Ivana Fiore, and Luca Bondioli. 2012. \u201cMore Than 500,000 Years of Right-handedness in Europeans.\u201d <em>Laterality<\/em> 17 (1): 51\u201369. <a class=\"rId143\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fu, Qiaomei, Mateja Hajdinjak, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Silviu Constantin, Swapan Mallick, Pontus Skoglund, Nick Patterson, et al. 2015. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from Romania with a Recent Neanderthal Ancestor.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 524 (7564): 216. <a class=\"rId144\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine, Elizabeth S. Noack, Eduard Pop, Constantin Herbst, Johannes Pfleging, Jonas Buchli, Arne Jacob, et al. 2018. \u201cEvidence for Close-Range Hunting by Last Interglacial Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Nature Ecology and Evolution<\/em> 2: 1087\u20131092. <a class=\"rId145\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId146\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gilpin, William., Marcus W. Feldman, and Kenichi Aoki. 2016. \u201cAn Ecocultural Model Predicts Neanderthal Extinction through Competition with Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 113 (8): 2134\u20132139. <a class=\"rId147\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Golovanova, Liubov. Vitaliena, Vladimir B. Doronichev, Naomi E. Cleghorn, Marianna A. Koulkova, Tatiana V. Sapelko, and M. Steven Shackley. 2010. \u201cSignificance of Ecological Factors in the Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 51 (5): 655\u2013691. <a class=\"rId148\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1086\/656185.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Harrold, Francis B. 1980. \u201cA Comparative Analysis of Eurasian Paleolithic Burials.\u201d <em>World Archaeology <\/em>12 (2): 195\u2013211.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Hawks, John, Marina Elliott, Peter Schmid, Steven E. Churchill, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, et al. 2017. &#8220;New Fossil Remains of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 6: e24232. <a class=\"rId149\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId150\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">10.7554\/eLife.24232.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Henry, Amanda G., Alison S. Brooks, and Dolores R. Piperno. 2010. \u201cMicrofossils and Calculus Demonstrate Consumption of Plants and Cooked Foods in Neanderthal Diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium).\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA<\/em> 108 (2): 486\u2013491. <a class=\"rId151\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Houldcroft, Charlotte J., and Simon J. Underdown. 2016. \u201cNeanderthal Genomics Suggests a Pleistocene Time Frame for the First Epidemiologic Transition.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 160 (3): 379\u2013388.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Emilia, Xin Jin, Asan, Zhuoma Bianba, Benjamin M. Peter, Nicolas Vinckenbosch, Yu Liang, et al. 2014. \u201cAltitude Adaptation in Tibetans Caused by Introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 512 (7513): 194-197.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jaouen, Klervia, Michael P. Richards, and Adeline Le Cabec. 2019. \u201cExceptionally High \u03b4<sup>15<\/sup>N Values in Collagen Single Amino Acids Confirm Neanderthals as High-Trophic Level Carnivores.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 116 (11): 4928\u20134933. <a class=\"rId152\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kandel, Andrew W., Michael Bolus, Knut Bretzke, Angela A. Bruch, Miriam N. Haidle, Christine Hertler, and Michael M\u00e4rker. 2015. \u201cIncreasing Behavioral Flexibility? An Integrative Macro-Scale Approach to Understanding the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa.\u201d<em> Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 23: 623\u2013668. <a class=\"rId153\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId154\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kortlandt, Adriaan. 2002. \u201cNeanderthal Anatomy and the Use of Spears.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 11 (5): 183\u2013184.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kruger, A., P. Randolph-Quinney, and M. Elliott. 2016. \u201cMultimodal Spatial Mapping and Visualization of Dinaledi Chamber and Rising Star Cave.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 112 (5\u20136). <a class=\"rId155\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lieberman, Philip, and Edmund S. Crelin. 1971. \u201cOn the Speech of Neanderthal Man.\u201d <em>Linguistic Inquiry<\/em> 2 (2): 203\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mendez, Fernando L., G. David Poznik, Sergi Castellano, and Carlos D. Bustamante. 2016. \u201cThe Divergence of Neanderthal and Modern Human Y Chromosomes.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 98 (4): 728\u2013734.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mora-Berm\u00fadez, Felipe, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak, Jula Peters, Ronald Naumann, Lei Xing, Mihail Sarov, et al. 2022. \u201cLonger Metaphase and Fewer Chromosome Segregation Errors in Modern Human Than Neanderthal Brain Development.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 8 (30). <a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ni, Xijun, Qiang Ji, Wensheng Wu, et al. \u201cMassive Cranium from Harbin in Northeastern China Establishes a New Middle Pleistocene Human Lineage.\u201d The Innovation 2 (June 25, 2021): 100130. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xinn.2021.100130\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xinn.2021.100130<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nicholson, Christopher M. 2017. \u201cEemian Paleoclimate Zones and Neanderthal Landscape Use: A GIS Model of Settlement Patterning during the Last Interglacial.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 438 (B): 144\u2013157. <a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nobel Prize, The. 2022. \u201cPress Release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2022.\u201d Nobelf\u00f6rsamlingen The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. Press release, November 3, 2022. <a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.\">https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nowell, April. 2016. \u201cChildhood, Play and the Evolution of Cultural Capacity in Neanderthals and Modern Humans.\u201d In<em> The Nature of Culture: Based on an Interdisciplinary Symposium \u201cThe Nature of Culture,\u201d T\u00fcbingen, Germany<\/em>, edited by M. N. Haidle, N. J. Conard, and M. Bolus, 87\u201397. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. <a class=\"rId160\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1007\/978-94-017-7426-0_9<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Parkington, John. 2003. \u201cMiddens and Moderns: Shellfishing and the Middle Stone Age of the Western Cape, South Africa.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 99 (5\u20136): 243\u2013274.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pearce, Eiluned, Chris Stringer, and R. I. M. Dunbar. 2013. \u201cNew Insights into Differences in Brain Organizations between Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 280 (1758): 20130168. <a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168<\/a><a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Peyr\u00e9gne, St\u00e9phane, Diyendo Massilani, Yaniv Swie,l et al. (2025). \u201cA High\u2011Coverage Genome from a 200,000\u2011Year-Old Denisovan.\u201d bioRxiv, October 20, 2025. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.10.20.683404\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.10.20.683404<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pomeroy, Emma, Paul Bennett, Chris O. Hunt, Tim Reynolds, Lucy Farr, Marine Frouin, James Holman, Ross Lane, Charles French, and Graeme Barker. 2020. \u201cNew Neanderthal Remains Associated with the \u2018Flower Burial\u2019 at Shanidar Cave.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 94 (373): 11\u201326. <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Radford, A., &amp; Scragg, R. (2013). Discovery of Kuru Revisited: How Anthropology Hindered Then Enhanced Kuru Research. <em>Health and History, 15<\/em>(2), 29\u201352. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rae, Todd, Thomas Koppe, and Chris B. Stringer. 2011. \u201cThe Neanderthal Face Is Not Cold-Adapted.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 60 (2): 234\u2013239. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ran, J; Xia, H; Xing, S; Li, H; Chen F. Homo longi, Denisovans, Neanderthal and other archaic hominins in eastern Asia prior to the rise of Homo sapiens. Science Bulletin. 2026; 71:973-976.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. 2010. \u201cGenetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 468: 1053\u20131060. <a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richards, Michael P., Paul B. Pettit, Erik Trinkaus, Fred H. Smith, Maja Paunovi\u0107, and Ivor Karavani\u0107. 2000. \u201cNeanderthal Diet at Vindija and Neanderthal Predation: The Evidence from Stable Isotopes.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 97 (13): 7663\u20137666.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">10.1073\/pnas.120178997.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richter, J\u00fcrgen, 2006. \u201cNeanderthals in Their Landscape: Neanderthals in Europe.\u201d In <em>Proceedings of the International Conference held in the Gallo-Roman Museum in Tongeren<\/em>, ERAUL 117, edited by B. Demarsin and M. Otte, 17\u201332. K\u00f6ln: Universit\u00e4t zu K\u00f6ln.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roksandic, Mirjana, Predrag Radovic, Xiu-Jie Wu, and Christopher J. Bae. 2021. \u201cResolving the \u2018Muddle in the Middle\u2019: The Case for <em>Homo bodoensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em>, 31 (1). <a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">10.1002\/evan.21929.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rougier, H., Crevecoeur, I., Beauval, C., Posth, C., Flas, D., Wi\u00dfing, C., Furtw\u00e4ngler, A., Germonpr\u00e9, M., G\u00f3mez-Olivencia, A., Semal, P., van der Plicht, J., Bocherens, H., &amp; Krause, J. (2016). Neandertal cannibalism and Neandertal bones used as tools in Northern Europe. <em>Scientific Reports, 6<\/em>(1). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slon, Viviane, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Benjamin Vernot, Cesare de Filippo, Steffi Grote, Bence Viola, Mateja Hajdinjak, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Genome of the Offspring of a Neanderthal Mother and a Denisovan Father.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 561 (7721): 113\u2013116.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smith, Tanya M., Paul Tafforeau, Donald J. Reid, Joanne Pouech, Vincent Lazzari, John P. Zermeno, Debbi Guatelli-Steinberg, et al. 2010. \u201cDental Evidence for Ontogenetic Differences Between Modern Humans and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (49): 20923\u201320928.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Staubwasser, Michael, Virgil Dr\u0103gu\u0282in, Bogdan P. Onac, Sergey Assonov, Vasile Ersek, Dirk L. Hoffman, and Daniel Veres. 2018. \u201cImpact of Climate Change on the Transition of Neanderthals to Modern Humans in Europe.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 115 (37): 9116\u20139121. <a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stewart, T. D. 1977. \u201cThe Neanderthal Skeletal Remains from Shanidar Cave, Iraq: A Summary of Findings to Date.\u201d<em> Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society <\/em>121 (2): 121\u2013165.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stolarczyk, Regine E., and Patrick Schmidt. 2018. \u201cIs Early Silcrete Heat Treatment a New Behavioural Proxy in the Middle Stone Age?\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (10): 1\u201321.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trinkaus, E. 1985. \u201cPathology and Posture of the La-Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology <\/em>67 (1): 19\u201341.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trujillo Cleber A., Edward S. Rice, Nathan K. Schaefer, Isaac A. Chaim, Emily C. Wheeler, Assael A. Madrigal, Justin Buchanan, et al. 2021. \u201cReintroduction of the Archaic Variant of NOVA1 in Cortical Organoids Alters Neurodevelopment.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 371 (6530): eaax2537. <a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Tu, H., Feng, X., Luo, L.; et al. 2026. The oldest in situ Homo erectus crania in eastern Asia: The Yunxian site dates to ~1.77 Ma. Science Advances. 12, eady2270.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tucci, Serena, Samuel H. Vohr, Rajiv C. McCoy, Benjamin Vernot, Matthew R. Robinson, Chiara Barbieri, Brad J. Nelson, et al. 2018. \u201cEvolutionary History and Adaptation of a Human Pygmy Population of Flores Island, Indonesia.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 361 (6401): 511\u2013516.<\/p>\n<p>Ullrich H, 2005: Cannibalistic Rites within Mortuary Practices from the Paleolithic to Middle Ages in Europe. <em>Anthropologie (Brno)<\/em> 43, 2-3: 249-261.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Van Andel, T. H., and P. C. Tzedakis. 1996. \u201cPaleolithic Landscapes of Europe and Environs, 150,000\u201325,000 Years Ago: An Overview.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 15 (5\u20136): 481\u2013500.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Venner, Stephen J. 2018. \u201cA New Estimate for Neanderthal Energy Expenditure.\u201d CUNY Academic Works.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Vernot, Benjamin, Serena Tucci, Janet Kelso, Joshua G. Schraiber, Aaron B. Wolf, Rachel M. Gittelman, Michael Danneman, et al. 2016. \u201cExcavating Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA from the Genomes of Melanesian Individuals.\u201d <em>Science <\/em>352 (6282): 235\u2013239.<\/p>\n<p>Villanea, F. A., Peede, D., Kaufman, E. J., et al. (2023). The muc19 gene: An evolutionary history of recurrent introgression and natural selection. National Library of Medicine. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2023.09.25.559202<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Weaver, T. D., and J. Hublin. 2009. \u201cNeanderthal Birth Canal Shape and the Evolution of Human Childbirth.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 106 (20): 8151\u20138156.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wi\u1e9eing, Christoph, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Rougier, Isabelle Crevecoer, Mietje Germonpr\u00e9, Yuichi Naito, Patrick Semal, and Herv\u00e9 Bocherens. 2015. \u201cIsotopic Evidence for Dietary Ecology of Late Neanderthals in Northwestern Europe.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 411 (A): 327\u2013345. <a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wong, Kate. 2015. \u201cNeanderthal Minds.\u201d <em>Scientific American<\/em> (January): 312(2): 36-43. <a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zhang, X. L., B. B. Ha, S. J. Wang, Z. J. Chen, J. Y. Ge, H. Long, W. He, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Earliest Human Occupation of the High-Altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 Thousand to 30 Thousand Years Ago.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 362 (6418): 1049\u20131051. <a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Zeberg, Hugo, Mattias Jakobsson, &amp; Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. (2024). \u201cThe Genetic Changes That Shaped Neandertals, Denisovans, and Modern Humans.\u201d Cell 187, no. 5:1047\u20131058. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cell.2023.12.029\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cell.2023.12.029<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zilh\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Diego E. Angelucci, Ernestina Badal-Garc\u00eda, Francesco d&#8217;Errico, Flor\u00e9al Daniel, Laure Dayet, Katerina Douka, et al. 2010. \u201cSymbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (3): 1023\u20131028. <a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zollikofer, Christopher Peter Edwards, and Marcia Silvia Ponce de Le\u00f3n. 2013. \u201cPandora\u2019s Growing Box: Inferring the Evolution and Development of Hominin Brains from Endocasts.\u201d Evolutionary Anthropology 22 (1): 20\u201333. <a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Acknowledgements<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The authors would like to extend their thanks to Cassandra Gilmore and Anna Goldfield for thoughtful and insightful suggestions on the first edition of this chapter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"glossary\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\" id=\"definition\">definition<\/span><template id=\"term_1689_1582\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1582\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<p>Stephanie Etting, Ph.D., Sacramento City College<\/p>\n<p><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Chapter 5: Meet the Living Primates<\/a>\u201d by Stephanie Etting. In <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition,<\/a> edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\">CC BY-NC 4.0<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe how studying nonhuman primates is important in anthropology.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Compare two ways of categorizing taxa: grades and clades.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Define different types of traits used to evaluate primate taxa.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify key ways that primates differ from other mammals.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Distinguish between the major primate taxa using their key characteristics.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe your place in nature by learning your taxonomic classification.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">You may be wondering why a field dedicated to the study of humans includes discussions of nonhuman animals. Our primary goal in biological anthropology is to understand how humans are similar to and different from the rest of the natural world, why we have the traits we have, and how we got to be the way we are. But to fully grasp our place in nature, we must look to our closest living relatives, the nonhuman primates. In this chapter, we focus on the organization and diversity within the Order Primates.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Studying Primates in Biological Anthropology<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are one of at least twenty Orders belonging to the Class Mammalia, and probably one of the oldest. One genetic estimate puts the origin of primates at approximately 91 million years ago (mya), predating the extinction of the dinosaurs (Bininda-Emonds Et al. 2007). Today, the Order Primates is a diverse group of animals that includes lemurs and lorises, tarsiers, monkeys, apes, and humans, all of which are united in sharing a suite of anatomical, behavioural, and life history characteristics. While nonhuman primates are fascinating animals in their own right, their close relationship to humans makes them ideal for studying humans via <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_944\">homology<\/a>, <\/strong>looking at traits that are shared between taxa because they inherited the trait from a common ancestor. For example, humans (genus <em>Homo<\/em>) and chimpanzees (genus <em>Pan<\/em>) both share the trait of male cooperation in hunting. This trait\u2014along with many others that chimpanzees and humans share\u2014is likely homologous<em>, <\/em>meaning it was probably passed down from the last common ancestor of <em>Homo<\/em> and <em>Pan, <\/em>which lived about 6\u20138 million years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nonhuman primates also make excellent comparators for learning about humans via <strong>analogy<\/strong>. Many nonhuman primates live in environments similar to those in which our ancestors lived and therefore exhibit traits similar to what we see in humans. For example, baboons and humans both have long legs. In humans, this is because about 1.7 million years ago, our ancestors moved into savanna habitats where longer legs helped them move more efficiently over long distances. Baboons, who also live in savanna habitats, independently evolved longer arms and legs for the same reason\u2014to be able to cover more ground, more efficiently. This means that having long legs is an analogous trait in baboons and humans: \u2014that is, this adaptation evolved independently in the two species but for the same purpose. Using homology and analogy, our closest living relatives provide the critical context in which to understand human biology, morphology, and behaviour. It is only by studying how humans compare with our primate relatives that we can fully comprehend our place in nature.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ways of Organizing Taxa<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">You learned in Chapter 2 about Linnaeus and the hierarchical nature of taxonomic classification. Our goal in classifying taxa is to create categories that reflect clade relationships. A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1116\">clade<\/a> <\/strong>is a grouping of organisms based on relatedness that reflects a branch of the evolutionary tree. Clade relationships are determined using traits shared by groups of taxa as well as genetic similarities. An example of a clade would be a grouping that includes humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas (Figure 6.1). These taxa are in what is referred to as the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1118\">African clade<\/a><\/strong> of hominoids (a taxonomic group you will learn about later in this chapter). The African clade grouping reflects how humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas all share a more recent ancestor with each other than any of them do with other species\u2014that is, we are on the same branch of the evolutionary tree. We know members of the African clade are most closely related based on shared morphological traits as well as genetic similarities. Excluded from this grouping is the orangutan, which is considered a member of the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1120\">Asian clade<\/a><\/strong> of hominoids.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/image1-3.jpg\" alt=\"Diagram shows large-bodied hominoids grouped by grade or clade.\" width=\"800\" height=\"358\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.1: Grades vs. Clades. A grade grouping of apes places orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos together based on their similar appearance and lifestyle, but excludes humans. Clade classification is based on shared derived traits and genetic evidence (both reflecting close evolutionary relationships). A clade grouping of apes places humans with gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos., whereas orangutans are separated. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Grades vs. clades comparison (Figure 5.12)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Orangutan_on_a_tree_(Unsplash).jpg\">Orangutan on a tree (Unsplash)<\/a> by Dawn Armfield, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/legalcode\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Gorilla_Profile_(17997840570).jpg\">Gorilla Profile (17997840570)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/100915417@N07\">Charlie Marshall<\/a> from Bristol UK, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chimpanzee_(14679767561).jpg\">Chimpanzee (14679767561)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/120374925@N06\">Magnus Johansson<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/pointing-finger-hand-pointing-1922074\/\">Pointing finger (1922074)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/truthseeker08-2411480\/\">truthseeker08<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In contrast, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1122\">grades<\/a> <\/strong>are groupings that reflect levels of adaptation or overall similarity and not necessarily evolutionary relationships. An example of a grade would be placing orangutans, gorillas, bonobos, and chimpanzees into a group, and excluding humans. Grouping in this way is based on the superficial similarities of the apes in being large-bodied, having lots of body hair, living in tropical forests, climbing and sleeping in trees, and so on. According to these criteria, humans seem to be unusual in that we differ in our morphology, behaviour, and ecology. Separating humans from the large-bodied apes is the system that was used historically. We now know that grouping orangutans, gorillas, bonobos, and chimpanzees and excluding humans does not accurately reflect our true evolutionary relationships. Since our goal in taxonomic classification is to organize animals to reflect their evolutionary relationships, we prefer to use clade classifications.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Types of Traits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When evaluating relationships between taxa, we use key traits that allow us to determine which species are most closely related to one another. Traits can be either ancestral or derived. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1124\">Ancestral traits<\/a><\/strong> are those that a taxon has because it has inherited the trait from a distant ancestor. For example, all primates have body hair because we are mammals and all mammals share an ancestor hundreds of millions of years ago that had body hair. This trait has been passed down to all mammals from a shared ancestor, so all mammals alive today have body hair. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1126\">Derived traits<\/a><\/strong> are those that have been more recently altered. This type of trait is most useful when we are trying to distinguish one group from another because derived traits tell us which taxa are more closely related to each other. For example, humans walk on two legs.The many adaptations that humans possess that allow us to move in this way evolved after humans split from the Genus <em>Pan<\/em>. This means that when we find fossil taxa that share derived traits for walking on two legs, we can conclude that they are likely more closely related to humans than to chimpanzees and bonobos<em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are a couple of other important points about ancestral and derived traits that will become apparent as we discuss primate diversity. First, the terms <em>ancestral<\/em> and <em>derived<\/em> are relative terms, meaning that a trait can be either one depending on the taxa being compared. For example, in the previous paragraph, body hair was used as an example for an ancestral trait among primates. All mammals have body hair because we share a distant ancestor who had this trait. The presence of body hair therefore doesn\u2019t allow you to distinguish whether monkeys are more closely related to apes or lemurs because they all share this trait. However, if we are comparing mammals to birds and fish, then body hair becomes a derived trait of mammals. It evolved after mammals diverged from birds and fish, and it tells us that all mammals are more closely related to each other than they are to birds or fish.The second important point is that very often when one lineage splits into two, one taxon will stay more similar to the last common ancestor in retaining more ancestral traits, whereas the other lineage will usually become more different from the last common ancestor by developing more derived traits. This will become very apparent when we discuss the two suborders of primates, Strepsirrhini and Haplorrhini. When these two lineages diverged, strepsirrhines retained more ancestral traits (those present in the earliest primates) and haplorrhines developed more derived traits (became more different from ancestral primates).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are two other types of traits that will be relevant to our discussions here: generalized and specialized traits. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1128\">Generalized traits<\/a> <\/strong>are those characteristics that are useful for a wide range of things. Having <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1138\">opposable thumbs<\/a><\/strong> that go in a different direction than the rest of your fingers is a very useful, generalized trait. You can hold a pen, grab a branch, peel a banana, or text your friends all thanks to your opposable thumbs! <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1130\">Specialized traits<\/a> <\/strong>are those that have been modified for a specific purpose. These traits may not have a wide range of uses, but they will be very efficient at their job. Hooves in horses are a good example of a specialized trait: they allow horses to run quickly on the ground on all fours. You can think of generalized traits as a Swiss Army knife, useful for a wide range of tasks but not particularly good at any one of them. That is, if you\u2019re in a bind, then a Swiss Army knife can be very useful to cut a rope or fix a loose screw, but if you were going to build furniture or fix a kitchen sink, then you\u2019d want specialized tools for the job. As we will see, most primate traits tend to be generalized.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">What Makes Something a Primate?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Order Primates is distinguished from other groups of mammals in having a <em>suite of characteristics<\/em>. This means that there is no individual trait that you can use to instantly identify an animal as a primate; instead, you have to look for animals that possess a collection of traits. What this also means is that each individual trait we discuss may be found in nonprimates, but if you see an animal that has most or all of these traits, there is a good chance it is a primate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are most distinguishable from other organisms in traits related to our vision. Our Order relies on vision as a primary sense, which is reflected in many areas of our anatomy and behaviour. All primates have eyes that face forward with convergent (overlapping) visual fields. So if you cover one eye with your hand, you can still see most of the room with your other one. This also means that we cannot see on the sides or behind us as well as some other animals can. In order to protect the sides of the eyes from the muscles we use for chewing, all primates have at least a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1132\">postorbital bar<\/a>, <\/strong>a bony ring around the outside of the eye (Figure 6.2). Primate taxa with more convergent eyes need extra protection, so animals with greater orbital convergence will have a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1134\">postorbital plate<\/a> <\/strong>or<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1136\">postorbital closure<\/a> <\/strong>in addition to the bar (Figure 6.2).The postorbital bar is a derived trait of primates, appearing in our earliest ancestors.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 661px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-4.jpg\" alt=\"Skulls of a monkey and lemur viewed from the side and top.\" width=\"661\" height=\"430\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.2: All primates have bony protection around their eyes. Some have a postorbital bar only (right), but many have full postorbital closure, also called a postorbital plate, that completely protects the back of the eye socket (left). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Postorbital bar\/Postorbital closure (Figure 5.1)<\/a> a derivative work original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Otolemur_crassicaudatus\/specimens\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Otolemur_crassicaudatus\/lateral\/\">Otolemur crassicaudatus (greater galago)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Otolemur_crassicaudatus\/specimens\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Otolemur_crassicaudatus\/dorsal1809\/\">Macaca fascicularis (long-tailed macaque)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another distinctive trait of our Order is that many primates have <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1140\">trichromatic color vision<\/a><\/strong>, the ability to distinguish reds and yellows in addition to blues and greens. Birds, fish, and reptiles are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1142\">tetrachromatic<\/a> <\/strong>(they can see reds, yellows, blues, greens, and even ultraviolet), but most mammals, including some primates, are only <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1144\">dichromatic<\/a> <\/strong>(they see only in blues and greens). It is thought that the nocturnal ancestors of mammals benefited from seeing better at night rather than in colour, and so dichromacy is the ancestral condition for mammals. Trichromatic primates are known to use their colour vision for all sorts of purposes: finding young leaves and ripe fruits, identifying other species, and evaluating signals of health and fertility.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The primate visual system uses a lot of energy, so primates have compensated by cutting back on other sensory systems, particularly our sense of smell. Compared to other mammals, primates have reduced snouts, another derived trait that appears even in the earliest primate ancestors. There is variation across primate taxa in how much snouts are reduced. Those with a better sense of smell usually have poorer vision than those with a relatively dull sense of smell. The reason for this is that all organisms have a limited amount of energy to spend on running our bodies, so we make <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1146\">evolutionary trade-offs<\/a><\/strong>, as energy spent on one trait cuts back on energy spent on another. So primates with better vision are spending more energy on vision and thus have a poorer smell (and shorter snout), and those who spend less energy on vision will have a better sense of smell (and a longer snout).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates also differ from other mammals in the size and complexity of our brains. On average, primates have brains that are twice as big for their body size when compared to other mammals. Not unexpectedly, the visual centres of the brain are larger in primates and the wiring is different from that in other animals, reflecting our reliance on this sense. The neocortex, which is used for higher functions like consciousness and language in humans, as well as sensory perception and spatial awareness, is also larger in primates relative to other animals. In nonprimates this part of the brain is often smooth, but in primates it is made up of many folds, which increase the surface area. It has been proposed that the more complex neocortex of primates is related to diet, with fruit-eating primates having larger relative brain sizes than leaf-eating primates, due to the more challenging cognitive demands required to find and process fruits (Clutton-Brock &amp; Harvey 1980). An alternative hypothesis argues that larger brain size is necessary for navigating the complexities of primate social life, with larger brains occurring in species who live in bigger, more complex groups relative to those living in pairs or solitarily (Dunbar 1998). There seems to be support for both hypotheses, as large brains are a benefit under both sets of selective pressures.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Animals with large brains usually have extended life history patterns, and primates are no exception. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1148\">Life history<\/a> <\/strong>refers to the pace at which an organism grows, reproduces, and ages. Some animals grow very quickly and reproduce many offspring in a short time frame but do not live very long. Other animals grow slowly, reproduce few offspring, reproduce infrequently, and live a long time. Primates are all in the \u201cslow lane\u201d of life history patterns. Compared to animals of similar body size, primates grow and develop more slowly, have fewer offspring per pregnancy, reproduce less often, and live longer. Primates also invest heavily in each offspring. With a few exceptions, most primates only have one offspring at a time. A group of small-bodied monkeys in South America regularly give birth to twins, and some lemurs can give birth to multiple offspring at a time, but these primates are the exception rather than the rule. Primates also reproduce relatively infrequently. The fastest-reproducing primates will produce offspring about every six months, while the slowest, the orangutan, reproduces only once every seven to nine years. This very slow reproductive rate makes the orangutan the slowest-reproducing animal on the planet! Primates are also characterized by having long lifespans. The group that includes humans and large-bodied apes has the most extended life history patterns among all primates, with some large-bodied apes estimated to live up to 58 years in the wild (Robson Et al. 2006).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 392px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-5.jpg\" alt=\"Various hands and feet of different primate species.\" width=\"392\" height=\"624\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.3: These drawings of the hands and feet of different primates show the opposable thumbs and big toes, pentadactyly, flattened nails, and tactile pads characteristic of our Order. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:PrimateFeet.jpg\">PrimateFeet<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Lydekker\">Richard Lydekker<\/a>, original from The Royal Natural History 1:15 (1893), is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Primates also differ from other animals in our hands and feet. The Order Primates is a largely <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1150\">arboreal<\/a><\/strong> taxonomic group, meaning that most primates spend a significant amount of their time in trees. As a result, the hands and feet of primates have evolved to move in a three-dimensional environment. Primates have the generalized trait of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1152\">pentadactyly<\/a><\/strong>\u2014 possessing five digits (fingers and toes) on each limb. Many nonprimates, like dogs and horses, have fewer digits because they are specialized for high-speed, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1154\">terrestrial<\/a><\/strong> (on the ground) running. Pentadactyly is also an ancestral trait, one that dates back to the earliest four-footed animals. Primates today have opposable thumbs and, with the exception of humans, opposable big toes (Figure 6.3). Opposable thumbs and toes are a derived trait that appeared in the earliest primate fossils about 55 million years ago. Having thumbs and big toes that go in a different direction from the rest of the fingers and toes allow primates to be excellent climbers in trees as well as to manipulate objects. Our ability to manipulate objects is further enhanced by the flattened nails on the backs of our fingers and toes that we possess in the place of the claws and hooves that many other mammals have. On the other side of our digits, we have sensitive <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1156\">tactile pads<\/a> <\/strong>that allow us to have a fine sense of touch. Primates use this fine sense of touch for handling food and, in many species, grooming themselves and others. In primates, grooming is an important social currency, through which individuals forge and maintain social bonds.<\/p>\n<table class=\"alignright\" style=\"width: 219.75pt;height: 407px\">\n<caption>Figure 6.4: Primate Traits at a Glance: This table summarizes the suite of traits that differentiate primates from other mammals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Primate at a glance table (Figure 5.3)<\/a> by Stephanie Etting original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;height: 30px;width: 361.667px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Primate suite of traits<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 362px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;height: 362px;width: 361.667px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Convergent eyes<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Postorbital bar<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Many have trichromatic colour vision<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short snouts<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Opposable thumbs and big toes<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Pentadactyly<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Flattened nails<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Tactile pads<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Highly arboreal<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Large brains<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Extended life histories<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Live in the tropics<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 362.033px\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Lastly, primates are very social animals. All primates, even those that search for food alone, establish strong social networks within species. Unlike many animals, primates do not migrate: they stay in a relatively stable area for their whole life, often interacting with the same individuals for their long lives. The long-term relationships that primates form with others of their species lead to complex and fascinating social behaviours (see Chapter 7). Finally, nonhuman primates show a clear preference for tropical regions of the world. Most primates are found between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn, with only a few taxa living outside these regions. Figure 6.4 shows a summary of primate traits.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Traits Used to Distinguish Between Primate Taxa<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When placing primate species into specific taxonomic groups, we focus on dental characteristics, behavioural adaptations, and locomotor adaptations. Differences in these characteristics across groups reflect constraints of evolutionary history as well as variation in adaptations.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dental Characteristics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Teeth may not seem like the most exciting topic with which to start, but we can learn a tremendous amount about an organism from its teeth. First, teeth are vital to survival. Wild animals do not have the benefit of knives and forks; they rely on their teeth to process their food. Because of this, teeth of any species have evolved to reflect what that organism eats and therefore have a lot to tell us about their diet. Second, variation in tooth size, shape, and number reveals an organism\u2019s evolutionary history. Some taxa have more teeth than others or different forms of teeth. Furthermore, differences in teeth between males and females can tell us about competition over mates (see Chapter 7). Lastly, teeth are overly represented in the fossil record. Enamel is hard, and there is little meat on jaws so carnivores and scavengers often leave them behind. Sometimes, the only remains we have from an extinct taxon is its teeth!<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 356px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-4-1.jpg\" alt=\"Yawning baboon with large teeth.\" width=\"356\" height=\"266\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.5: This picture of an open-mouthed Hamadryas baboon demonstrates the diastema between his upper canine and front teeth. This space is taken up by his lower canine when he closes his mouth. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ha,ha,ha_...._(14986571843).jpg\">Ha,ha,ha .... (14986571843)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/104249543@N07\">Rolf Dietrich Brecher<\/a> from Germany is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Like other mammals, primates are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1158\">heterodont<\/a><\/strong>: they have multiple types of teeth that are used for different purposes. We have <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1160\">incisors<\/a> <\/strong>for slicing; <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1162\">premolars<\/a> <\/strong>and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1164\">molars<\/a> <\/strong>for grinding up our food; and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1166\">canines<\/a><\/strong>, which most primates (not humans) use as weapons against predators and each other. The sizes of canines vary across species and can often be <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1168\">sexually dimorphic<\/a><\/strong>, with males tending to have larger canines than females. Some nonhuman primates <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1170\">hone<\/a><\/strong>, or sharpen, their canines by gnashing the teeth together to sharpen the sides. The upper canine sharpens on the first lower premolar and the lower canine sharpens on the front of the upper canine. As canines get larger, they require a space to fit in order for the jaws to close. This space between the teeth is called a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1172\">diastema<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 6.5).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">We use a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1174\">dental formula<\/a><\/strong> to specify how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molars are in each quadrant of the mouth (half of the top or bottom). For example, Figure 6.6 shows half of the lower teeth of a human. You can see that in half of the mandible, there are two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and three molars. This dental formula is written as 2:1:2:3. (The first number represents the number of incisors, followed by the number of canines, premolars, and molars.)<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 241px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-5.png\" alt=\"Human mandible with four types of teeth.\" width=\"241\" height=\"424\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.6:\u00a0 This drawing shows half of the human mandible. With the four types of teeth labeled, you can determine that the dental formula is 2:1:2:3. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Gray997.png\">Gray997<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henry_Vandyke_Carter\">Henry Vandyke Carter<\/a>, original in Henry Gray (1918) Anatomy of the Human Body, Plate 997, is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To determine the dental formula, you need to be able to identify the different types of teeth. You can recognize incisors because they often look like spatulas with a flat, blade-like surface. Premolars and molars can be differentiated by the number of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1176\">cusps<\/a><\/strong> that they have. Cusps are the bumps that you can feel with your tongue on the surface of your back teeth. Premolars are smaller than molars and, in primates, often have one or two cusps on them. Molars are bigger, providing a larger chewing surface, and have more cusps. Depending on the species and whether you\u2019re looking at upper or lower teeth, primate molars can have between three and five cusps. Molar cusps can also vary between taxa in how they are arranged; you will learn more about this later in this chapter. Canines are often easy to distinguish because, in most taxa, they are much longer and more conical than the other teeth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Teeth also directly reflect an organism\u2019s diet. Primates are known to eat a wide range of plant parts, insects, gums, and, rarely, meat. While all primates eat a variety of foods, what differs among primates are the proportions of each of these food items in the diet. That is, two primates living in the same forest may be eating the same foods but in vastly different proportions, and so we would categorize them as different dietary types. The most common dietary types among primates are those whose diets consist primarily of fruit (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_954\">frugivores<\/a><\/strong>), those who eat mostly insects (<strong>insectivores<\/strong>), and those who eat primarily leaves (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_956\">folivores<\/a><\/strong>). A few primate taxa are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1178\">gummivores<\/a><\/strong>, specializing in eating gums and saps, but we will only focus on the adaptations found in the three primary dietary groups.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Frugivores<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Plants want animals to eat their fruits because, in doing so, animals eat the seeds of the fruit and then disperse them far away from the parent plant. Therefore, plants often \u201cadvertise\u201d fruits by making them colourful and easy to spot, full of easy-to-digest sugars that make them taste good and, often, easy to chew and digest (not being too fibrous or tough). For these reasons, frugivores often do not need a lot of specialized traits to consume a diet rich in fruits (Figure 6.7). Their molars usually have a broad chewing surface with low, rounded cusps (referred to as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1180\">bunodont<\/a> <\/strong>molars). Frugivores have large incisors for slicing through the outer coatings on fruit, and they tend to have stomachs, colons, and small intestines that are intermediate in terms of size and complexity between insectivores and folivores (Chivers &amp; Hladik 1980). They are also usually of intermediate body size between the other two dietary types. Because fruit does not contain protein, frugivores must supplement their diet with protein from insects, leaves, and\/or seeds. Frugivores who get protein by eating seeds evolved to have thicker enamel on their teeth to protect them from excessive wear.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 503px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-2.jpg\" alt=\"Upper teeth and maxilla of a frugivore monkey.\" width=\"503\" height=\"331\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.7: Frugivores are characterized by large incisors, bunodont molars, and digestive tracts that are intermediate in complexity between the other two dietary types. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Papio_papio\/utr0087\/\">Papio papio (Guinea baboon).jpg<\/a> by Phil Myers on <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 License. <\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Insectivores<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While insects can be difficult to find and catch, they are easy to chew and digest. As a result, insectivorous primates usually have small molars with pointed cusps to puncture the exoskeleton of the insects (Figure 6.8), and they have simple stomachs and colons with a long small intestine to process the insects. Nutritionally, insects provide a lot of protein and fat but are not plentiful enough in the environment to support large-bodied animals, so insectivores are usually the smallest of the primates.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 351px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-3.jpg\" alt=\"Mandible, upper teeth, and maxilla of insectivore tarsier.\" width=\"351\" height=\"280\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.8: Insectivores need sharp, pointed molar cusps to break through the exoskeletons of insects. Insects are easy to digest, so these primates have simple digestive tracts. Credit: Tarsier (an insectivor)\u2019s teeth original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 License.<\/a> [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Tarsius_syrichta\/lower_lateral1942\/\">Lower_lateral1942<\/a> by Phil Myers on <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Tarsius_syrichta\/ventral\/\">Ventral<\/a> by Phil Myers on <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Folivores<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Plants rely on leaves to get energy from the sun, so plants do not want animals to eat their leaves (unlike their fruit). As a result, plants evolved to try to discourage animals from eating their leaves. Leaves often carry toxins, taste bitter, are very fibrous and difficult to chew, and are made of large cellulose molecules that are difficult to break down into usable sugars. Thus, animals who eat leaves need a lot of specialized traits (Figure 6.9). Folivorous primates have broad molars with high, sharp cusps connected by <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1182\">shearing crests<\/a><\/strong>. These molar traits allow folivores to physically break down fibrous leaves when chewing. Folivores then chemically break down cellulose molecules into usable energy. To do this, some folivores have complex stomachs with multiple compartments, while others have large, long intestines and special gut bacteria that can break up cellulose. Folivores are usually the largest bodied of all primates, and they tend to spend a large portion of their day digesting their food, so they are less active than frugivores or insectivores.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-2.jpg\" alt=\"Upper teeth and maxilla of a monkey shows folivore traits.\" width=\"468\" height=\"337\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.9: To derive energy from leaves, folivores, like this Trachypithecus (dusky leaf monkey), have smaller incisors and high sharp molar cusps connected by shearing crests. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Trachypithecus_obscurus\/utr0075\/\">Trachypithecus obscurus (dusky leaf monkey) upper teeth<\/a> by Phil Myers on <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a> has been modified (background removed, labels added by Stephanie Etting) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Behavioural Adaptations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Since Chapter 6 is dedicated to primate behaviour, we will only briefly discuss variations in activity patterns, social grouping, and habitat use. Primate groups differ in <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1184\">activity patterns<\/a><\/strong>: whether they are active during the day (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1012\">diurnal<\/a><\/strong>), at night (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1010\">nocturnal<\/a><\/strong>), or through the 24-hour period (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1186\">cathemeral<\/a><\/strong>). Primate taxa vary in social groupings: some are primarily solitary, others live in pairs, and still others live in groups of varying sizes and compositions. Lastly, some taxa are primarily arboreal while others are more terrestrial.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Locomotor Adaptations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, primate groups vary in their adaptations for different forms of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1188\">locomotion<\/a><\/strong>, or how they move around. Living primates are known to move by vertical clinging and leaping, quadrupedalism, brachiation, and bipedalism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1190\">Vertical clinging and leaping<\/a> <\/strong>is when an animal grasps a vertical branch with its body upright, pushes off with long hind legs, and then lands on another vertical support branch (Figure 6.10a). Animals who move in this way usually have longer legs than arms, long fingers and toes, and smaller bodies. Vertical clinger leapers also tend to have elongated ankle bones, which serve as a lever to help them push off with their legs and leap to another branch (Figure 6.10b).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_181\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-181\" style=\"width: 608px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-147\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/5.10.jpg\" alt=\"Movement of vertical clinger and leaper, and tarsier skeleton.\" width=\"608\" height=\"462\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-181\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.10a: Vertical clingers and leapers have longer legs than arms, long lower backs, and long fingers and toes. They also have elongated ankle bones to help them push off when leaping. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6e\/Propithecus_vertical_clinging_and_leaping.svg\">Propithecus vertical clinging and leaping<\/a> by Terpsichores is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. 6.10b: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Em_-_Tarsius_tarsier_-_3.jpg\">Tarsier skeleton<\/a> by Em\u0151ke D\u00e9nes has been modified (background removed) by Stephanie Etting and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. Original Spectral tarsier (Tarsius tarsier) skeleton at the Cambridge University Museum of Zoology, England.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1192\">Quadrupedalism<\/a><\/strong>, walking on all fours, is the most common form of locomotion among primates. Quadrupedal animals usually have legs and arms that are about the same length and a tail for balance. Arboreal quadrupeds (Figure 6.11a) usually have shorter arms and legs and longer tails, while terrestrial quadrupeds (Figure 6.11b) have longer arms and legs and, often, shorter tails. These differences relate to the lower centre of gravity needed by arboreal quadrupeds for balance in trees and the longer tail required for better balance when moving along the tops of branches. Terrestrial quadrupeds have longer limbs to help them cover more distance more efficiently.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_181-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-181-2\" style=\"width: 704px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-148\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/5.11.jpg\" alt=\"Arboreal quadrupedal monkey and terrestrial quadrupedal monkey.\" width=\"704\" height=\"251\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-181-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.11a\/b: Two examples of quadrupedal primates. The capuchin monkey skeleton on the left (a) is a typical arboreal quadruped with shorter arms and legs, longer fingers and toes, and a long tail. The baboon skeleton on the right (b) is a terrestrial quadruped with relatively long arms and legs, shorter fingers and toes, and a short tail. Credits: 6.11a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Description_iconographique_compar%C3%A9e_du_squelette_et_du_syst%C3%A8me_dentaire_des_mammif%C3%A8res_r%C3%A9cents_et_fossiles_(Sapajus_apella).jpg\">Capuchin monkey skeleton<\/a> by Henri-Marie Ducrotay de Blainville is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>. 6.11b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Description_iconographique_compar%C3%A9e_du_squelette_et_du_syst%C3%A8me_dentaire_des_mammif%C3%A8res_r%C3%A9cents_et_fossiles_(Papio_ursinus).jpg\">Baboon<\/a> by Henri-Marie Ducrotay de Blainville is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The third form of locomotion seen in primates is<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1194\">brachiation<\/a><\/strong>, the way of moving you used if you played on \u201cmonkey bars\u201d as a child. Brachiation involves swinging below branches by the hands (Figure 6.12a). To be an efficient brachiator, a primate needs to have longer arms than legs, flexible shoulders and wrists, a short lower back, and no tail (Figure 6.12b). Some primates move via <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1196\">semi-brachiation<\/a><\/strong>, in which they swing below branches but do not have all of the same specializations as brachiators. Semi-brachiators have flexible shoulders, but their arms and legs are about the same length, which is useful because they are quadrupedal when on the ground. They also use long <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1198\">prehensile tails<\/a><\/strong> as a third limb when swinging (Figure 6.13). The underside of the tail has a tactile pad, resembling your fingerprints, for better grip.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_181-3\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-181-3\" style=\"width: 1600px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img class=\"wp-image-149 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/5.12.jpg\" alt=\"Primate swinging through branches and gibbon skeleton.\" width=\"1600\" height=\"800\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-181-3\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.12a. Example of brachiation. 6.12b. Skeleton of a typical brachiator, showing longer arms than legs, short back, and lack of a tail. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Brachiator (Figure 5.9b)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/a\/a3\/Giboia.jpg\">Skeleton of Gibbon (Giboia) <\/a>by Joxerra Aihartza is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/artlibre.org\">Free Art License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<figure style=\"width: 565px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-1.jpg\" alt=\"Spider monkey swinging below a rope.\" width=\"565\" height=\"377\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.13. Spider monkeys are considered semi-brachiators, as they can swing below branches but use their tails as a third limb. On the ground they move via quadrupedal locomotion. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ateles-fusciceps_54724770b.jpg\">Ateles-fusciceps 54724770b<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:LeaMaimone\">LeaMaimone<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.5\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.5 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lastly, humans move around on two feet, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1200\">bipedalism<\/a><\/strong>. Some nonhuman primates will occasionally travel on two feet but do so awkwardly and never for long distances. Among mammals, only humans have evolved to walk with a striding gait on two legs as a primary form of locomotion.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Primate Diversity<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As we begin exploring the different taxa of primates, it is important to keep in mind the hierarchical nature of taxonomic classification and how this relates to the key characteristics that will be covered. Figure 6.14 summarizes the major taxonomic groups of primates that you will learn about here. If you locate humans on the chart, you can trace our classification and see all of the categories getting more inclusive as you work your way up to the Order Primates. This means that humans will have the key traits of each of those groups. It is a good idea to refer to the figure to orient yourself as we discuss each taxon.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 2048px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-1.jpg\" alt=\"Taxonomic chart shows primate order, suborder, infraorder, superfamily, and species.\" width=\"2048\" height=\"1154\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.14: This taxonomy chart shows the major groups of primate taxa, starting with the largest category (Order) and moving to more specific categories and examples. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Primate taxonomy char (Figure 5.11)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/phylopic.org\/image\/d6cfb28f-136e-4a20-a5ac-8eb353c7fc4a\/\">Lemur catta Linnaeus, 1759<\/a> by Roberto D\u00edaz Sibaja, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/\">CC BY 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Lorisoidea<\/a> original to<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"> Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Tarsiiformes<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/phylopic.org\/image\/156b515d-f25c-4497-b15b-5afb832cc70c\/\">Cebinae Bonaparte, 1831<\/a> by Sarah Werning, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/\">CC BY 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/phylopic.org\/image\/899742c2-9a40-4fa0-b2cd-2eb133c8f6e8\/\">Colobus guereza Ruppell, 1835<\/a> by Yan Wong, designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/phylopic.org\/image\/72f2f854-f3cd-4666-887c-35d5c256ab0f\/\">Papio cynocephalus<\/a> by Owen Jones, designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/vectors\/animals-silhouette-wolf-elephant-2755766\/\">animals silhouette wolf elephant (2755766)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/mohamed_hassan-5229782\/\">mohamed_hassan<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Suborder Strepsirrhini<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 387px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-1.jpg\" alt=\"Eight strepsirrhine species.\" width=\"387\" height=\"605\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.15: (Clockwise from top right) sifaka, black-and-white ruffed lemur, loris, galago, slender loris, mouse lemur, aye-aye, and ring-tailed lemur. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Extant_Strepsirrhini.jpg\">Extant Strepsirrhini<\/a> a collective work by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/23661161@N02\">Mark Dumont<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Katta_csal%C3%A1d.jpg\">Katta csal\u00e1d<\/a> by Veszpr\u00e9mi \u00c1llatkert, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Aye-aye_at_night_in_the_wild_in_Madagascar.jpg\">Aye-aye at night in the wild in Madagascar<\/a> by Frank Vassen, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Diademed_ready_to_push_off.jpg\">Diademed ready to push off<\/a> by Michael Hogan, designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Juvenile_Black-and-White_Ruffed_Lemur,_Mantadia,_Madagascar.jpg\">Juvenile Black-and-White Ruffed Lemur, Mantadia, Madagascar<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/42244964@N03\">Frank Vassen<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Microcebus_murinus_-Artis_Zoo,_Amsterdam,_Netherlands-8a.jpg\">Microcebus murinus -Artis Zoo, Amsterdam, Netherlands-8a<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/46956042@N00\">Arjan Haverkamp<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Slow_Loris.jpg\">Slow Loris<\/a> by Jmiksanek, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Slender_Loris.jpg\">Slender Loris<\/a> by Kalyan Varma (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Kalyanvarma\">Kalyanvarma<\/a>), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Garnett's_Galago_(Greater_Bushbaby).jpg\">Garnett's Galago (Greater Bushbaby)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/23661161@N02\">Mark Dumont<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Order Primates is subdivided into Suborder Strepsirrhini and Suborder Haplorrhini, which, according to molecular estimates, split about 70\u201380 million years ago (Pozzi et al. 2014). The strepsirrhines include the groups commonly called lemurs, lorises, and galagos (Figure 6.15). Strepsirrhines differ from haplorrhines in many ways, most of which involve retaining ancestral traits from the earliest primates. Strepsirrhines do have two key derived traits that evolved after they diverged from the haplorrhines: the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1202\">grooming claw<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 6.16) on the second digit of each foot, and the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1204\">tooth comb<\/a><\/strong> (or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1206\">dental comb<\/a><\/strong>) located on the lower, front teeth (Figure 6.17). In most strepsirrhines, there are six teeth in the toothcomb\u2014four incisors and two canines. Other than the tooth comb, the teeth of strepsirrhines are fairly simple and are neither large or distinctive relative to haplorrhines.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 237px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18.jpg\" alt=\"A long, thin dark claw is visible in contrast to flat dark nails on the other digits.\" width=\"237\" height=\"202\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.16: The foot of a ring-tailed lemur showing its grooming claw on the second digit. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lemur_catta_toilet_claw.jpg\">Lemur catta toilet claw<\/a> by Alex Dunkel (Maky) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 3.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Compared to haplorrhines, strepsirrhines rely more on nonvisual senses. Strepsirrhines get their name because they have wet noses (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1208\">rhinariums<\/a><\/strong>) like cats and dogs, a trait that, along with a longer snout, reflect strepsirrhines\u2019 greater reliance on olfaction relative to haplorrhines. Many strepsirrhines use <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1210\">scent marking<\/a><\/strong>, including rubbing scent glands or urine on objects in the environment to communicate with others. Additionally, many strepsirrhines have mobile ears that they use to locate insect prey and predators. While strepsirrhines have a better sense of smell than haplorrhines, their visual adaptations are more ancestral. Strepsirrhines have less convergent eyes than haplorrhines and therefore all have postorbital bars, whereas haplorrhines have full postorbital closure (see Figure 6.2). All strepsirrhines have a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1212\">tapetum lucidum<\/a><\/strong>, a reflective layer at the back of the eye that reflects light and thereby enhances the ability to see in low-light conditions. It is the same layer that causes your dog or cat to have \u201cyellow eye\u201d when you take photos of them with the flash on. This is a trait thought to be ancestral among mammals as a whole.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 292px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-1.jpg\" alt=\"The lower, front teeth are long, thin, tightly together in a line, and project towards the lips.\" width=\"292\" height=\"354\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.17: The lower front teeth of a ring-tailed lemur showing the six teeth of the tooth comb: four incisors and two canines. The teeth that superficially look like canines are premolars. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lemur_catta_toothcomb.jpg\">Lemur catta toothcomb<\/a> by Alex Dunkel (Maky) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 3.0 license.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Strepsirrhines also differ from haplorrhines in some aspects of their ecology and behaviour. The majority of strepsirrhines are solitary, traveling alone to search for food; a few taxa are more social. Most strepsirrhines are also nocturnal and arboreal. Strepsirrhines are, on average, smaller than haplorrhines, and so many of them have a diet consisting of insects and fruit, with few taxa eating primarily leaves. Lastly, most strepsirrhines are good at leaping, with several taxa specialized for vertical clinging and leaping. In fact, among primates, all but one of the vertical clinger leapers belong to the Suborder Strepsirrhini.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Strepsirrhines can be found all across Asia, Africa, and on the island of Madagascar (Figure 6.18). The Suborder Strepsirrhini is divided into two groups: (1) the lemurs of Madagascar and (2) the lorises, pottos, and galagos of Africa and Asia. By molecular estimates, these two groups split about 65 million years ago (Pozzi Et al. 2014).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 443px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-1.png\" alt=\"Map strepsirrhine primates locations.\" width=\"443\" height=\"342\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.18: Geographic distribution of living strepsirrhines. Lemurs live only on Madagascar, while lorises and galagos live across Central Africa and South and Southeast Asia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Geographic distribution of living strepsirrhines (Figure 5.16)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4><em>Lemurs of Madagascar<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Madagascar is an island off the east coast of Africa, and it is roughly the size of California, Oregon, and Washington combined. It has been separated from Africa for about 130 million years and from India for about 85 million years, which means it was already an island when strepsirrhines got there approximately 60\u201370 million years ago. Only a few mammal species ever reached Madagascar, and so when lemurs arrived they were able to flourish into a variety of forms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The lemurs of Madagascar are much more diverse compared to their mainland counterparts, the lorises and galagos. While many Malagasy strepsirrhines are nocturnal, plenty of others are diurnal or cathemeral. They range in body size from the smallest of all primates, the mouse lemur, some species of which weigh a little over an ounce (see Figure 6.15), up to the largest of all strepsirrhines, the indri, which weighs up to about 20 pounds (Figure 6.19). Lemurs include species that are insectivorous, frugivorous, and folivorous. A couple of members of this group have unusual diets for primates, including the gummivorous fork-marked and bamboo lemurs, who are able to metabolize the cyanide in bamboo. The most unique lemur is the aye-aye (depicted in Figure 6.15). This nocturnal lemur has rodent-like front teeth that grow continuously and a long-bony middle finger that it uses to fish grubs out of wood. It has a very large brain compared to other strepsirrhines, which it fuels with a diet that includes bird\u2019s eggs and other animal matter. Based on genetic estimates and morphological studies, it is believed that aye-ayes were the first lemurs to separate from all other strepsirrhines and to evolve on their own since strepsirrhines arrived in Madagascar (Matsui Et al. 2009).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 326px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Two Indis in a tree.\" width=\"326\" height=\"217\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.19: Indris, the largest of the lemurs. These folivorous lemurs are vertical clingers and leapers and live in pairs. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Indri_indri_0003.jpg\">Indri indri 0003<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Christophe_Germain\">Christophe Germain<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lemurs are also diverse in terms of social behaviour: Many lemurs are solitary foragers, some live in pairs, others in small groups, still others in larger groups, and some, like the red-ruffed lemur, live in unique and complex social groups (Vasey 2006). Lemurs include some of the best vertical clingers and leapers, and while many lemurs are quadrupedal, even the quadrupedal lemurs are quite adept at leaping. Malagasy strepsirrhines also exhibit a few unusual traits. They are highly seasonal breeders, often mating only during a short window once a year (Wright 1999). Female ring-tailed lemurs, for example, come into estrus one day a year for a mere six hours. Unlike most primates, where males are typically large and dominant, Malagasy strepsirrhines feature socially dominant females that are similar in size to males and have priority access to resources.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Lorises, Pottos, and Galagos of Asia and Africa<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 207px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22-1.jpg\" alt=\"Slow loris hanging from a branch.\" width=\"207\" height=\"309\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.20: This slow loris, like all others in this taxonomic group, is solitary and nocturnal, with a diet heavy in insects and fruit. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nycticebus_coucang_002.jpg\">Nycticebus coucang 002<\/a> by David Haring \/ Duke Lemur Center is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Unlike the lemurs of Madagascar, lorises, pottos, and galagos live in areas where they share their environments with monkeys and apes, who often eat similar foods. Lorises live across South and Southeast Asia, while pottos and galagos live across Central Africa. Because of competition with larger-bodied monkeys and apes, mainland strepsirrhines are more restricted in the niches they can fill in their environments and so are less diverse than the lemurs.<\/p>\n<p>The strepsirrhines of Africa and Asia are all nocturnal and solitary, with little variation in body size and diet. For the most part, the diet of lorises, pottos, and galagos consists of fruits and insects. A couple of species eat more gum, but overall the diet of this group is narrow when compared to the Malagasy lemurs. Lorises (Figure 6.20) and pottos are known for being slow, quadrupedal climbers, moving quietly through the forests to avoid being detected by predators. These strepsirrhines have developed additional defenses against predators. Lorises, for example, eat a lot of caterpillars, which makes their saliva slightly toxic. Loris mothers bathe their young in this toxic saliva, making the babies unappealing to predators. In comparison to the slow-moving lorises and pottos, galagos are active quadrupedal runners and leapers that scurry about the forests at night. Galagos make distinctive calls that sound like a baby crying, which has led to their nickname \u201cbushbabies.\u201d Figure 6.21 summarizes the key differences between these two groups of strepsirrhines.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.21: Strepsirrhini at a glance: This table summarizes the key differences between the two groups of strepsirrhines. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Strepsirrhines at a glance table (Figure 5.19)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ringtailed_Lemurs_in_Berenty.jpg\">Ringtailed Lemurs in Berenty<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/50852241@N00\">David Dennis<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Komba_u%C5%A1at%C3%A1.jpg\">Komba u\u0161at\u00e1<\/a> by Petr Hamern\u00edk, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-1.jpg\" alt=\"Baby primate on the back of adult primate.\" width=\"231\" height=\"165\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Lemurs<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24-1.jpg\" alt=\"Small primate with big eyes and long tail.\" width=\"198\" height=\"132\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Lorises, Pottos, and Galagos<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Geographic range<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Madagascar<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">South and Southeast Asia<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Central Africa<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Activity patterns<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Diurnal, nocturnal, or cathemeral<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Nocturnal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Dietary types<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Insectivore, frugivore, or folivore<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Insectivore, frugivore<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Social groupings<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Solitary, pairs, or small to large groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Solitary<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Forms of locomotion<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Vertical clinger leapers, quadrupedal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Slow quadrupedal climbers and active quadrupedal runners<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Suborder Haplorrhini<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When the two primate suborders split from one another, strepsirrhines retained more ancestral traits while haplorrhines developed more derived traits, which are discussed below.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As mentioned earlier, haplorrhines have better vision than strepsirrhines. This is demonstrated by the full postorbital closure protecting the more convergent eyes that haplorrhines possess (with one exception seen in Figure 6.2). Most haplorrhines are trichromatic, and all have a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1410\">fovea<\/a><\/strong>, a depression in the retina at the back of the eye containing concentrations of cells that allows them to see things very close up in great detail. The heavier reliance on vision over olfaction is also reflected in the shorter snouts ending with the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1412\">dry nose<\/a> <\/strong>(no rhinarium) of haplorrhines. All but two genera of living haplorrhines are active during the day, so this group lacks the tapetum lucidum that is so useful to nocturnal species. On average, haplorrhines also have larger brains relative to their body size when compared with strepsirrhines.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Haplorrhini differ from the Strepsirrhini in their ecology and behaviour as well. Haplorrhines are generally larger than strepsirrhines, and they tend to be folivorous and frugivorous. This dietary difference is reflected in the teeth of haplorrhines, which are broader with more surface area for chewing. The larger body size of this taxon also influences locomotion. Only one haplorrhine is a vertical clinger and leaper. Most members of this suborder are quadrupedal, with one subgroup specialized for brachiation. A few haplorrhine taxa are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1414\">monomorphic<\/a><\/strong>, meaning males and females are the same size, but many members of this group show moderate to high sexual dimorphism in body size and canine size. Haplorrhines also differ in social behaviour. All but two haplorrhines live in groups, which is very different from the primarily solitary strepsirrhines. Differences between the two suborders are summarized in Figure 6.22.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.22: Suborders at a glance: This table summarizes the key differences between the two primate suborders. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Suborders at a glance table (Figure 5.20)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Black-and-White_Ruffed_Lemur,_Mantadia,_Madagascar.jpg\">Black-and-White Ruffed Lemur, Mantadia, Madagascar<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/42244964@N03\">Frank Vassen<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Crab_eating_macaque_face.jpg\">Crab eating macaque face<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Bruce89\">Bruce89<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25.jpg\" alt=\"Black-and-white ruffed lemur.\" width=\"213\" height=\"159\" \/><\/strong><strong>Suborder Strepsirrhini<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26-1.jpg\" alt=\"Crab-eating macaque.\" width=\"137\" height=\"137\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Suborder Haplorrhini<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a1-R\">\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Sensory adaptations<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Rhinarium<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Longer snout<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Eyes less convergent<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Postorbital bar<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Tapetum lucidum<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Mobile ears<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">No rhinarium<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short snout<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Eyes more convergent<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Postorbital plate<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">No tapetum lucidum<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Many are trichromatic<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Fovea<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a1-R\">\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Dietary differences<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Mostly insectivores and frugivores, few folivores<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Few insectivores, mostly frugivores and folivores<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a1-R\">\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Activity patterns and Ecology<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Mostly nocturnal, few diurnal or cathemeral<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Almost entirely arboreal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Only two are nocturnal, rest are diurnal<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Many arboreal taxa, also many terrestrial taxa<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a1-R\">\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Social groupings<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Mostly solitary, some pairs, small to large groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Only two are solitary, all others live in pairs, small to very large groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a1-R\">\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Sexual dimorphism<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Minimal to none<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;vertical-align: middle;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Few taxa have little\/none, many taxa show moderate to high dimorphism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Suborder Haplorrhini is divided into three infraorders: Tarsiiformes, which includes the tarsiers of Asia; Platyrrhini, which includes the monkeys of Central and South America; and Catarrhini, a group that includes the monkeys of Asia and Africa, apes, and humans. According to molecular estimates, tarsiers split from the other haplorrhines close to 70 million years ago, and platyrrhines split from catarrhines close to 46 million years ago (Pozzi Et al. 2014).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Infraorder Tarsiiformes of Asia<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 188px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27-1.jpg\" alt=\"Tarsier gripping a branch.\" width=\"188\" height=\"160\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.23: Tarsiers are the only living representatives of this Infraorder. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tarsier_Sanctuary,_Corella,_Bohol_(2052878890).jpg\">Tarsier Sanctuary, Corella, Bohol (2052878890)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/46274125@N00\">yeowatzup<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 362px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28-1.png\" alt=\"Map of Southeast Asia shows distribution of tarsiers.\" width=\"362\" height=\"279\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.24: Tarsiiformes are found in the tropical forests of multiple islands in Southeast Asia including Sumatra, Borneo, Celebes, and the Philippines. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Infraorder Tarsiiformes of Asia map (Figure 5.22)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Today, the Infraorder Tarsiiformes includes only one genus, <em>Tarsius <\/em>(Figure 6.23). Tarsiers are small-bodied primates that live in Southeast Asian forests (Figure 6.24) and possess an unusual collection of traits that have led to some debate about their position in the primate taxonomy. They are widely considered members of the haplorrhine group because they share several derived traits with monkeys, apes, and humans, including dry noses, a fovea, not having a tapetum lucidum, and eyes that are more convergent. Tarsiers also have some traits that are more like strepsirrhines and some that are unique. Tarsiers are the only haplorrhine that are specialized vertical clinger leapers, a form of locomotion only otherwise seen in some strepsirrhines. Tarsiers actually get their name because their ankle (tarsal) bones are elongated to provide a lever for vertical clinging and leaping. Tarsiiformes are also small, with most species weighing between 100 and 150 grams. Like strepsirrhines, tarsiers are nocturnal, but because they lack a tapetum lucidum, tarsiers compensate by having enormous eyes. In fact, each eye of a tarsier is larger than its brain. These large eyes allow enough light in for tarsiers to still be able to see well at night without the reflecting layer in their eyes. To protect their large eyes, tarsiers have a partially closed postorbital plate that appears somewhat intermediate between the postorbital bar of strepsirrhines and the full postorbital closure of other haplorrhines (Figure 6.25). Tarsiers have different dental formulas on their upper and lower teeth. On the top, the dental formula is 2:1:3:3, but on the bottom it is 1:1:3:3. Other unusual traits of tarsiers include having two grooming claws on each foot and the ability to rotate their heads around 180 degrees, a trait useful in locating insect prey. The tarsier diet is considered <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1416\">faunivorous<\/a> <\/strong>because it consists entirely of animal matter, making them the only primate not to eat any vegetation. They are only one of two living haplorrhines to be solitary, the other being the orangutan. Most tarsiers are not sexually dimorphic, like strepsirrhines, although males of a few species are slightly larger than females.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 486px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29-1.jpg\" alt=\"Front view of tarsier skull.\" width=\"486\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.25: Skull of a tarsier showing very large eye sockets and partially closed postorbital plates. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tarsier_skull.jpg\">Tarsier skull<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65438265@N00\">Andrew Bardwell<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Two alternative classifications have emerged due to the unusual mix of traits that tarsiers have. Historically, tarsiers were grouped with lemurs, lorises, and galagos into a suborder called Prosimii. This classification was based on tarsiers, lemurs, lorises, and galagos all having grooming claws and similar lifestyles. Monkeys, apes, and humans were then separated into a suborder called the Anthropoidea. These suborder groupings were based on <em>grade<\/em> rather than <em>clade<\/em>. Today, most people use Suborders Strepsirrhini and Haplorrhini, which are clade groupings based on the derived traits that tarsiers share with monkeys, apes, and humans. The Strepsirrhini\/Haplorrhini dichotomy is also supported by the genetic evidence that indicates tarsiers are more closely related to monkeys, apes, and humans (Jameson Et al. 2011). Figure 6.26 summarizes the unusual mix of traits seen in tarsiers.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.26: Tarsiers at a glance: Tarsiers have a mix of traits that lead to debate about their classification. While they have some unique characteristics, they also have traits that superficially resemble strepsirrhines, and many derived traits shared with haplorrhines. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Tarsiers at a glance table (Figure 5.24)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Like Strepsirrhini<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Unique<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Like Haplorrhini<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a2-R\">\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Very small<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Nocturnal<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Highly insectivorous<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Solitary<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Vertical clinger-leapers<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Little\/no sexual dimorphism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Two grooming claws<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">2:1:3:3\/1:1:3:3 dental formula<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Do not eat vegetation<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Can rotate their heads nearly 180 degrees<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Almost full PO closure<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">More convergent eyes<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">No tapetum lucidum<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">No rhinarium<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Genetic evidence<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Fovea<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Infraorder Platyrrhini of Central and South America<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure id=\"attachment_179\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-179\" style=\"width: 329px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-165\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30-e1686352290168.png\" alt=\"Map of South America shows where platyrrhines live.\" width=\"329\" height=\"324\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-179\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.27: Geographic distribution of the platyrrhines across the southern part of Central America and the tropical and termporate regions of South America. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Infraorder Platyrrhini map<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The platyrrhines are the only nonhuman primates in Central and South America (Figure 6.27) and so, like the lemurs of Madagascar, have diversified into a variety of forms in the absence of competition. Infraorder Platyrrhini get their name from their distinctive nose shape. \u201cPlaty\u201d means flat and \u201crhini\u201d refers to noses, and, indeed, platyrrhines have noses that are flat and wide, with nostrils that are far apart, facing outward, and usually round in shape (Figure 6.28). This nose shape is very different from what we see in catarrhines.<\/p>\n<p>On average, platyrrhines are smaller and less sexually dimorphic than catarrhines, and they have retained the more ancestral primate dental formula of 2:1:3:3. Platyrrhines are all highly arboreal, whereas many catarrhines spend significant time on the ground. The monkeys in Central and South America also differ in having less well-developed vision. This is reflected in the wiring in the visual system of the brain as well as in their <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1418\">polymorphic color vision<\/a><\/strong>. The genes that enable individuals to distinguish reds and yellows from blues and greens are on the X chromosome. Different genes code for being able to see different wavelengths of light so to distinguish between them you need to be heterozygous for seeing colour. The X chromosomes of platyrrhines each carry the genes for seeing one wavelength, so male platyrrhines (with only one X chromosome) are always dichromatic. Female platyrrhines can be dichromatic (if they are homozygous for one version of the colour vision gene) or trichromatic (if they are heterozygous) (Kawamura Et al. 2012). We currently know of two exceptions to this pattern among platyrrhines. Nocturnal owl monkeys are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1420\">monochromatic<\/a><\/strong>, meaning that they cannot distinguish any colours. The other exception are howler monkeys, which have evolved to have two colour vision genes on each X chromosome. This means that both male and female howler monkeys are able to see reds and yellows. By contrast, catarrhine males and females are all trichromatic.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 279px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image31-1.jpg\" alt=\"White-faced capuchin monkey.\" width=\"279\" height=\"190\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.28: A capuchin monkey demonstrating a typical platyrrhine nose shape with round nostrils pointing outward on a flat nose. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:CARABLANCA_-_panoramio.jpg\">CARABLANCA - panoramio<\/a> by Manuel Velazquez is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Platyrrhines include the smallest of the monkeys, the marmosets and tamarins (Figure 6.29), all of which weigh less than one kilogram and live in cooperative family groups, wherein usually only one female reproduces and everyone else helps carry and raise the offspring. They are unusual primates in that they regularly produce twins. Marmosets and tamarins largely eat gums and saps, so these monkeys have evolved claw-like nails that enable them to cling to the sides of tree trunks like squirrels as well as special teeth that allow them to gnaw through bark. Except for the Goeldi\u2019s monkey, these small monkeys have one fewer molar than other platyrrhines, giving them a dental formula of 2:1:3:2.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 428px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image32-1.jpg\" alt=\"Six marmoset and tamarin species.\" width=\"428\" height=\"470\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.29: Clockwise from top right: golden-headed lion tamarin, pygmy marmoset, Goeldi\u2019s monkey, bare-eared marmoset, emperor tamarin, and common marmoset. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Callitrichinae_genus.jpg\">Callitrichinae genus<\/a> by Miguelrangeljr is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Wei%C3%9Fb%C3%BCschelaffe_(Callithrix_jacchus).jpg\">Wei\u00dfb\u00fcschelaffe_(Callithrix_jacchus)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Raymond\">Raymond<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>;\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Leontopithecus_chrysomelas_(portrait).jpg\">Leontopithecus chrysomelas (portrait)<\/a> by Hans Hillewaert, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Emperor_Tamarin_portrait_2_edit1.jpg\">Emperor_Tamarin_portrait_2_edit1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/thebrockeninglory\/\">Brocken Inaglory<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dv%C3%A6rgsilkeabe_Callithrix_pygmaea.jpg\">Dv\u00e6rgsilkeabe_Callithrix_pygmaea<\/a> by Malene Thyssen (User <a href=\"https:\/\/da.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Malene\">Malene<\/a>), <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/GNU_Free_Documentation_License\">GNU Free Documentation License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mico_argentatus_(portrait).jpg\">Mico_argentatus_(portrait)<\/a> by Hans Hillewaert, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Titi_Monkey.jpg\">Titi Monkey<\/a> by Jeff Kubina, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>].]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The largest platyrrhines are a family that include spider monkeys, woolly spider monkeys, woolly monkeys, and howler monkeys (Figure 6.30). These monkeys can weigh up to 9\u201315 kg and have evolved prehensile tails that can hold their entire body weight. It is among this group that we see semi-brachiators, like the spider monkey (see Figure 6.13). To make them more efficient in this form of locomotion, spider monkeys evolved to not have thumbs so that their hands work more like hooks that can easily let go of branches while swinging. Howler monkeys are another well-known member of this group, earning their name due to their loud calls, which can be heard miles away. To make these loud vocalizations, howler monkeys have a specialized vocal system that includes a large larynx and hyoid bone. Howler monkeys are the most folivorous of the platyrrhines and are known for spending a large portion of their day digesting their food.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 458px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image33-1.jpg\" alt=\"Four platyrrhine species.\" width=\"458\" height=\"457\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.30: Clockwise from top right: howler monkey, woolly monkey, woolly spider monkey, and spider monkey. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Atelidae_Family.jpg\">Atelidae Family<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Miguelrangeljr\">Miguelrangeljr<\/a> is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ateles_marginatus_(Sao_Paulo_zoo).jpg\">Ateles marginatus (Sao Paulo zoo)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Miguelrangeljr\">Miguelrangeljr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Alouatta_caraya_male.JPG\">Alouatta caraya male<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Miguelrangeljr\">Miguelrangeljr<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lagothrix_lagotricha_(walking).jpg\">Lagothrix lagotricha (walking)<\/a> by Hans Hillewaert, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Brachyteles_hypoxanthus2.jpg\">Brachyteles hypoxanthus2<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/42956474@N04\/with\/4133258867\/\">Paulo B. Chaves<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are many other monkeys in Central and South America, including the gregarious capuchins (see Figure 6.28) and squirrel monkeys, the pair-living titi monkeys, and the nocturnal owl monkeys. There are also the seed-eating saki monkeys and uakaris. In many areas across Central and South America, multiple species of platyrrhines share the forests, with some even traveling together in association. According to molecular evidence, the diversity of platyrrhines that we see today seems to have originated about 25 million years ago (Schneider &amp; Sampaio 2015). Figure 6.31 summarizes the key traits of platyrrhines relative to the other infraorders of Haplorrhini.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.31: Platyrrhini at a glance: Summary of the key traits we use to distinguish platyrrhines. Traits indicated with an * are those with exceptions detailed in the text. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Platyrrhini at a glance table (Figure 5.29)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a3-R\">\n<td class=\"a3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Platyrrhini traits<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a3-R\">\n<td class=\"a3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Flat nose with rounded nostrils pointing to the side<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Highly arboreal<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Less sexually dimorphic on average<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">2:1:3:3 dental formula*<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Polymorphic colour vision*<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Infraorder Catarrhini of Asia and Africa <\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 191px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image34.jpg\" alt=\"Wolf\u2019s guenon.\" width=\"191\" height=\"287\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.32: A Wolf\u2019s guenon demonstrating a typical catarrhine nose with teardrop-shaped nostrils close together and pointed downward. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Wolf's_Guenon_Picking_Up_Food_(19095137693).jpg\">Wolf's Guenon Picking Up Food (19095137693)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/8749778@N06\">Eric Kilby<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Infraorder Catarrhini includes Superfamily Cercopithecoidea (the monkeys of Africa and Asia) and Superfamily Hominoidea (apes and humans). Nonhuman catarrhines are found all over Africa and South and Southeast Asia, with some being found as far north as Japan. The most northerly and southerly catarrhines are cercopithecoid monkeys. In contrast, apes are less tolerant of drier, more seasonal environments and so have a relatively restricted geographic range.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Relative to other haplorrhine infraorders, catarrhines are distinguished by several characteristics. Catarrhines have a distinctive nose shape, with teardrop-shaped nostrils that are close together and point downward (Figure 6.32) and one fewer premolar than most other primates, giving us a dental formula of 2:1:2:3 (Figure 6.33). On average, catarrhines are the largest and most sexually dimorphic of all primates. Gorillas are the largest living primates, with males weighing up to 220 kg. The most sexually dimorphic of all primates are mandrills. Mandrill males not only have much more vibrant colouration than mandrill females but also have larger canines and can weigh up to three times more (Setchell Et al. 2001). The larger body size of catarrhines is related to the more terrestrial lifestyle of many members of this infraorder. In fact, the most terrestrial of living primates can be found in this group. Among all primates, vision is the most developed in catarrhines. Catarrhines independently evolved the same adaptation as howler monkeys in having each X chromosome with genes to distinguish both reds and yellows, so all male and female catarrhines are trichromatic, which is useful for these diurnal primates.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 632px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image35-1.jpg\" alt=\"Platyrrhine, cercopithecoid, and hominoid mandibles.\" width=\"632\" height=\"331\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.33: Catarrhines have two premolars whereas most other primate taxa (including platyrrhini) have three premolars. This image also shows one of the derived traits of cercopithecoids, their bilophodont molars, which differ from the more ancestral Y-5 molars of apes and humans. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Platyrrhini vs. Catarrhini dentition<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Animalia\/specimens\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Cebus_apella\/lower_dorsal2216\/?start=135;f=subject::specimen::lower%20jaw\">Cebus apella (brown capuchin)<\/a> at Animal Diversity Web by <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Hylobates_syndactylus\/lower_dorsal0097\/\">Phil Myers<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Animalia\/specimens\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Lophocebus_albigena\/lower_dorsal2060\/?start=525;f=subject::specimen::lower%20jaw\">Lophocebus albigena (gray-cheeked mangaby)<\/a> at Animal Diversity Web by <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Hylobates_syndactylus\/lower_dorsal0097\/\">Phil Myers<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Primates\/specimens\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Hylobates_syndactylus\/lower_dorsal0097\/?start=105;f=subject::specimen::lower%20jaw\">Symphalangus syndactylus (siamang)<\/a> at Animal Diversity Web by <a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/collections\/contributors\/phil_myers\/ADW_mammals\/specimens\/Primates\/Hylobates_syndactylus\/lower_dorsal0097\/\">Phil Myers<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 3.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The two superfamilies of catarrhines\u2014Superfamily Cercopithecoidea, the monkeys of Africa and Asia, and Superfamily Hominoidea, which includes apes and humans\u2014are believed to have split about 32 million years ago based on molecular evidence (Pozzi Et al. 2014). This fits with the fossil record, which shows evidence of these lineages by about 25 million years ago (see Chapters 8-9).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Superfamily Cercopithecoidea of Africa and Asia<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 285px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image36-1.jpg\" alt=\"Pinkish ischial callosities on a crested black macaque.\" width=\"285\" height=\"214\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.34: The second derived trait of cercopithecoids are their ischial callosities, shown here on a crested black macaque. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Sulawesi_trsr_DSCN0572_v1.JPG\">Sulawesi trsr DSCN0572 v1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Shankar_Raman\">T. R. Shankar Ramanis<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Compared to hominoids, cercopithecoids have an ancestral quadrupedal body plan with two key derived traits. The first derived trait of cercopithecoids is their <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1422\">bilophodont<\/a> <\/strong>molars (\u201cbi\u201d meaning two, \u201cloph\u201d referring to ridge, and \u201cdont\u201d meaning tooth). If you refer back to Figure 6.33, you will see how the molars of cercopithecoids have four cusps arranged in a square pattern and have two ridges connecting them. It is thought that this molar enabled these monkeys to eat a wide range of foods, thus allowing them to live in habitats that apes cannot. The other key derived trait that all cercopithecoids share is having <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1424\">ischial callosities<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 6.34). The ischium is the part of your pelvis that you are sitting on right now (see Appendix A: Osteology). In cercopithecoids, this part of the pelvis has a flattened surface that, in living animals, has callused skin over it. These function as seat pads for cercopithecoids, who often sit above branches when feeding and resting.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 359px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image37-1.png\" alt=\"Areas of Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia where cercopithecoids live.\" width=\"359\" height=\"277\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.35: Geographic distribution of the cercopithecoid monkeys. Catarrhines have the widest geographic distribution due to the success of cercopithecoids who are found all across subsaharan Africa and southern Asia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Superfamily Cercopithecoidea map (Figure 5.33)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Cercopithecoid monkeys are the most geographically widespread group of nonhuman primates (Figure 6.35). Since their divergence from hominoids, this monkey group has increased in numbers and diversity due, in part, to their fast reproductive rates. On average, cercopithecoids will reproduce every one to two years, whereas hominoids will reproduce once every four to nine years, depending on the taxon.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 180px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image38-1.jpg\" alt=\"Two silver leaf monkeys hold orange-haired infants.\" width=\"180\" height=\"240\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.36: Silver leaf monkey infants are born with orange fur, dramatically contrasting the adult coat colour of their mothers. After a few months, the infants gradually change colour to that of their parents. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Silverleaf_Monkey_(Kuala_Lumpur).jpg\">Silverleaf Monkey (Kuala Lumpur)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/10815162@N07\">Andrea Lai<\/a> from Auckland, New Zealand, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Cercopithecoidea is split into two groups, the leaf monkeys and the cheek-pouch monkeys. Both groups coexist in Asia and Africa; however, the majority of leaf monkey species live in Asia with only a few taxa in Africa. In contrast, only one genus of cheek-pouch monkey lives in Asia, and all the rest of them in Africa. As you can probably guess based on their names, the two groups differ in terms of diet. Leaf monkeys are primarily folivores, with some species eating a significant amount of seeds. Cheek-pouch monkeys tend to be more frugivorous or omnivorous, with one taxon, geladas, eating primarily grasses. The two groups also differ in some other interesting ways. Leaf monkeys tend to produce infants with <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1426\">natal coats<\/a><\/strong>\u2014infants whose fur is a completely different colour from their parents (Figure 6.36). Leaf monkeys are also known for having odd noses (Figure 6.37), and so they are sometimes called \u201codd-nosed monkeys.\u201d Cheek-pouch monkeys are able to pack food into their cheek pouches (Figure 6.38), thus allowing them to move to a location safe from predators or aggressive individuals of their own species where they can eat in peace.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 408px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image39.jpg\" alt=\"Male proboscis monkey.\" width=\"408\" height=\"272\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.37: Proboscis monkeys are one of several \u201codd-nosed\u201d leaf monkeys. Male proboscis monkeys, like this one, have large, pendulous noses, while females have much smaller noses. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Proboscis_monkey_(Nasalis_larvatus)_male_head.jpg\">Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) male head<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sharpphotography.co.uk\/\">Charles J Sharp<\/a> creator QS:P170,Q54800218 is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 414px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image40-1.jpg\" alt=\"Bonnet macaque with full cheek pouches.\" width=\"414\" height=\"275\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.38: This bonnet macaque has filled its cheek pouches with food, an adaptation that is useful in transporting food to a safer location to eat. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bonnet_macaque_DSC_0893.jpg\">Bonnet macaque DSC 0893<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Shankar_Raman\">T. R. Shankar Raman<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Superfamily Hominoidea of Africa and Asia<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 438px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image41.png\" alt=\"Areas of Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia where hominoidea live.\" width=\"438\" height=\"339\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.39: Geographic distribution of apes across Central and West Africa and Southeast Asia. Hominoids overlap geographically with cercopithecoid monkeys but have a lower tolerance for seasonal environments and so are found only in tropical forests across these regions. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Superfamily Hominoidea map (Figure 5.38)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Superfamily Hominoidea of Africa and Asia (Figure 6.39) includes the largest of the living primates: apes and humans. Whereas cercopithecoid monkeys have bilophodont molars, hominoids have the more ancestral <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1428\">Y-5 molars<\/a><\/strong>, which feature five cusps separated by a \u201cY\u201d-shaped groove pattern (see Figure 6.33). The Y-5 molar was present in the common ancestors of hominoids and cercopithecoids, thus it is the more ancestral molar pattern of the two. Hominoids differ the most from other primates in our body plans, due to the unique form of locomotion that hominoids are adapted for: brachiation (Figure 6.40).<\/p>\n<p>To successfully swing below branches, many changes to the body needed to occur. Hominoid arms are much longer than the legs to increase reach, and the lower back is shorter and less flexible to increase control when swinging. The torso, shoulders, and arms of hominoids have evolved to increase range of motion and flexibility (see again Figure 6.12). The clavicle, or collar bone, is longer to stabilize the shoulder joint out to the side, thus enabling us to rotate our arms 360 degrees. Hominoid rib cages are wider side to side and shallower front to back than those of cercopithecoids and we do not have tails, as tails are useful for balance when running on all fours but generally not useful while swinging. Hominoids also have modified ulnae, one of the two bones in the forearm (see Appendix A: Osteology). At the elbow end of the ulna, hominoids have a short <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1430\">olecranon process<\/a><\/strong>, which allows for improved extension in our arms. At the wrist end of the ulna, hominoids have a short <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1432\">styloid process<\/a><\/strong>, which enables us to have very flexible wrists, a trait critical for swinging. Both the olecranon process and styloid process are long in quadrupedal animals who carry much of their weight on their forelimbs when traveling and who therefore need greater stability rather than flexibility in those joints.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.40: Quadrupedalism vs. brachiation: Summary of the key anatomical differences between a quadrupedal primate and one adapted for brachiation. To view these traits using photos of bones, check out the interactive skeletal websites in \u201cFurther Explorations\u201d below. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Quadrupedalism vs. Brachiation table (Figure 5.39)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Quadrupedalism<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Brachiation<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Arm length vs. leg length<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">About equal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Arms are longer<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Shoulder position<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">More on the front<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Out to the side<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Ribcage shape<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Deep front-to-back<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Narrow side-to-side<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Shallow front-to-back<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Wide side-to-side<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Length of lower back<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Long<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Collar bone length<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Long<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Ulnar olecranon process<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Long<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Ulnar styloid process<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Long<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a4-R\">\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Tail<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Short to long<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">None<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Apes and humans also differ from other primates in behaviour and life history characteristics. Hominoids all seem to show some degree of female dispersal at sexual maturity but, as you will learn in Chapter 7, it is more common that males leave. Some apes show males dispersing in addition to females, but the hominoid tendency for female dispersal is a bit unusual among primates. Our superfamily is also characterized by the most extended life histories of all primates. All members of this group take a long time to grow and reproduce much less frequently compared to cercopithecoids. The slow pace of this life history is likely related to why hominoids have decreased in diversity since they first evolved. Figure 6.41 summarizes the key traits of Infraorder Catarrhini and its two superfamilies. Today, there are only five types of hominoids left: gibbons and siamangs, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos, and humans.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\">\n<caption>Figure 6.41a: Catarrhini at a glance: Summary of key traits of the Infraorder Catarrhini. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Catarrhini at a glance (Figure 5.40)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Duskyleafmonkey1.jpg\">Duskyleafmonkey1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.the-ninth.com\/about\">Robertpollai<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/at\/deed.en\">CC BY 3.0 AT<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Male_Bornean_Orangutan_-_Big_Cheeks.jpg\">Male Bornean Orangutan - Big Cheeks<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/8749778@N06\">Eric Kilby<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>.]<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 22pt\">\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\" colspan=\"2\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Infraorder Catarrhini<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a5-R\" style=\"height: 22pt\">\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\" colspan=\"2\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Downward facing, tear-drop shaped nostrils, close together<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Arboreal and more terrestrial taxa<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">On average, largest primates<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">On average, most sexually dimorphic taxonomic group<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">2:1:2:3 dental formula<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">All trichromatic<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 6.41b: Characteristics used to distinguish between the two Catarrhini superfamilies. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-4\/\">Catarrhini at a glance (Figure 5.40)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Stephanie Etting is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Duskyleafmonkey1.jpg\">Duskyleafmonkey1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.the-ninth.com\/about\">Robertpollai<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/at\/deed.en\">CC BY 3.0 AT<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Male_Bornean_Orangutan_-_Big_Cheeks.jpg\">Male Bornean Orangutan - Big Cheeks<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/8749778@N06\">Eric Kilby<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0<\/a>.]<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image42-1.jpg\" alt=\"Dusky leaf monkey\" width=\"248\" height=\"186\" \/><\/strong><strong>Superfamily Cercopithecoidea<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image43-1.jpg\" alt=\"Orangutan\" width=\"274\" height=\"183\" \/><\/strong><strong>Superfamily Hominoidea<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a5-R\">\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Wide geographic distribution<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Bilophodont molars<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Ischial callosities<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Reproduce every 1\u20132 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Tropical forests of Africa and Asia<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Y-5 molars<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Adaptations for brachiation<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Reproduce every 4\u20139 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Family <\/em>Hylobatidae <em>of Southeast Asia<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 441px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image44-1.jpg\" alt=\"Siamang with outstretched arms.\" width=\"441\" height=\"294\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.42: Siamangs are the largest of the Hylobatidae family. They are all black with a throat sac that can become inflated to give out loud calls. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/suneko\/373310729\/\">Shout (373310729)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/suneko\/\">su neko<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The number of genera in this group has been changing in recent years, but the taxa broadly encompasses gibbons and siamangs. Both are found across Southeast Asian tropical forests. Gibbons weigh, on average, about 13 pounds and tend to be more frugivorous, whereas siamangs are larger than gibbons and also more folivorous. Unlike the larger-bodied apes (orangutans, chimps, bonobos, and gorillas) who make nests to sleep in every night, gibbons and siamangs will develop callused patches on their ischium resembling ischial callosities. Gibbon species are quite variable in their colouration and markings, while siamangs are all black with big throat sacs that are used in their exuberant vocalizations (Figure 6.42). Both gibbons and siamangs live in pairs with very little sexual dimorphism, although males and females do differ in colouration in some gibbon species.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\">Pongo<em> of Southeast Asia<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Genus <em>Pongo <\/em>refers to orangutans. These large red apes are found in Southeast Asia, with the two well-known species each living on the islands of Borneo and Sumatra. A third, very rare species, was recently discovered in Southern Sumatra (Nater Et al. 2017). Orangutans are highly frugivorous but will supplement their diet with leaves and bark when fruit is less available. As mentioned earlier, orangutans are the only diurnal, solitary taxon among primates and are extremely slow to reproduce, producing only one offspring about every seven to nine years. They are highly sexually dimorphic (Figure 6.43 a &amp; b), with fully developed, \u201cflanged\u201d males being approximately twice the size of females. These males have large throat sacs; long, shaggy coats; and cheek flanges. The skulls of male orangutans often feature a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1434\">sagittal crest<\/a><\/strong>, which is believed to function as additional attachment area for chewing muscles as well as a trait used in sexual competition (Balolia, Soligo, &amp; Wood 2017). An unusual feature of orangutan biology is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1436\">male bimaturism<\/a><\/strong>. Male orangutans are known to delay maturation until one of the more dominant, flanged males disappears. The males that delay maturation are called \u201cunflanged\u201d males, and they can remain in this state for their entire life. Unflanged males resemble females in their size and appearance and will sneak copulations with females while avoiding the bigger, flanged males. Flanged and unflanged male orangutans represent alternative reproductive strategies, both of which successfully produce offspring (Utami Et al. 2002).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_181-4\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-181-4\" style=\"width: 1900px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-180 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/5.43.jpg\" alt=\"a. Female orangutan with infant. b. Male orangutan in a tree.\" width=\"1900\" height=\"800\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-181-4\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.43: (a) A female orangutan eating fruit with her infant nearby and (b) a flanged adult male eating leaves. Male orangutans are about twice the size of females and have a longer coat length, cheek flanges, and throat sac. Credit: 6.43a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Orang_Utan_(Pongo_pygmaeus)_female_with_baby_(8066259067).jpg\">Orang Utan (Pongo pygmaeus) female with baby (8066259067)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\">Bernard DUPONT<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 Licence<\/a>. 6.43b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Orangutan_-Zoologischer_Garten_Berlin-8a.jpg\">Orangutan -Zoologischer Garten Berlin-8a<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/37088680@N03\">David Forsman<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\">Gorilla <em>of Africa<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are several species of gorillas that can be found across Central Africa. Gorilla males, like orangutan males, are about twice the size of female gorillas (Figures 6.44a &amp; b). When on the ground, gorillas use a form of quadrupedalism called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1438\">knuckle-walking<\/a><\/strong>, wherein the fingers are curled under and the weight is carried on the knuckles. Male gorillas have a large sagittal crest and large canines compared with females. Adult male gorillas are often called \u201csilverbacks\u201d because when they reach about twelve to thirteen years old, the hair on their backs turns silvery gray. Gorillas typically live in groups of one male and several females. Gorillas are considered folivorous, although some species can be more frugivorous depending on fruit seasonality (Remis 1997).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_181-5\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-181-5\" style=\"width: 1900px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-181 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/5.44.jpg\" alt=\"a. Female gorilla with offspring. b. Male gorilla.\" width=\"1900\" height=\"800\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-181-5\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.44: (a) A female gorilla with her two offspring and (b) a silverback adult male. Male gorillas are about twice the size of females. They also differ from females in having a large sagittal crest and a silver back, which appears as they mature. Credit: 6.44a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Enzo_naomi_echo.jpg\">Enzo naomi echo<\/a> by Zoostar is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 3.0 License<\/a>. 6.44b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Male_gorilla_in_SF_zoo.jpg\">Male gorilla in SF zoo<\/a> by Brocken Inaglory is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"learning-objectives\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\">Pan<em> of Africa<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 252px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image49-1.jpg\" alt=\"Bonobo looks away from the camera.\" width=\"252\" height=\"222\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.45: Bonobo (Pan paniscus). You can see the distinctive hair-part on this bonobo. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bonobo_male_Jasongo_15yo_Twycross_582a_(2014_11_14_01_04_18_UTC).jpg\">Bonobo male Jasongo 15yo Twycross 582a (2014 11 14 01 04 18 UTC)<\/a> by William H. Calvin is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Genus <em>Pan <\/em>includes two species: <em>Pan troglodytes <\/em>(the common chimpanzee) and <em>Pan paniscus <\/em>(the bonobo). These species are separated by the Congo River, with chimpanzees ranging across West and Central Africa and bonobos located in a restricted area south of the Congo River. Chimpanzees and bonobos both have broad, largely frugivorous diets.The two species differ morphologically in that bonobos are slightly smaller, have their hair parted down the middle of their foreheads, and are born with dark faces (Figure 6.45). In contrast, chimpanzees do not have the distinctive parted hair and are born with light faces that darken as they mature (Figure 6.46). Chimpanzees and bonobos live in a grouping called a fission-fusion community, which you will learn more about in Chapter 6. Both species are moderately sexually dimorphic, with males about 20% larger than females. When on the ground, chimpanzees and bonobos knuckle-walk like gorillas do.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 418px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image50-1.jpg\" alt=\"Female chimpanzee with offspring in a tree.\" width=\"418\" height=\"278\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.46: A common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) female (centre) and her offspring. Note the pink face of the youngest individual. Bonobos are born with dark-skinned faces, but chimpanzees are born with pink faces that darken with age. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chimpanzees_in_Uganda_(5984913059).jpg\">Chimpanzees in Uganda (5984913059)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/57424551@N06\">USAID Africa Bureau<\/a> uploaded by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Elitre\">Elitre<\/a> is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\">Homo<\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The last member of the Hominoidea to discuss is our own taxon, Genus <em>Homo<\/em>. Later chapters will discuss the many extinct species of <em>Homo<\/em>, but today there is only one living species of <em>Homo, <\/em>our own species, <em>sapiens<\/em>. While it is interesting to focus on how humans differ from apes in many aspects of our morphology, behaviour, and life history, one objective of this chapter, and of biological anthropology in general, is to understand our place in nature. This means looking for aspects of human biology that link us to the taxonomic diversity we have discussed. To that end, here we will focus on similarities humans share with other hominoids.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Like other hominoids, humans lack a tail and possess upper-body adaptations for brachiation. While our lower body has been modified for a bipedal gait, we are still able to swing from branches and throw a baseball, all thanks to our mobile shoulder joint. Humans, like other hominoids, also have a Y-5 cusp pattern on our molars. All hominoids, including humans, have an extended life history, taking time to grow and develop, and reproducing slowly over a long life span. Lastly, while humans show a great deal of variation across cultures, many human societies show tendencies for female dispersal (Burton Et al. 1996).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Among the hominoids, humans show particular affinities with other members of the African Clade, <em>Pan <\/em>and <em>Gorilla<\/em>. Humans share over 96% of our DNA with gorillas (Scally Et al. 2012), and over 98% with <em>Pan <\/em>(Ebersberger Et al. 2002). Even without this strong genetic evidence, the African Clade of hominoids share many morphological similarities, including having wide-set eye sockets and backward-sweeping cheekbones. Today, <em>Pan<\/em> and <em>Gorilla<\/em> knuckle-walk when on the ground, and it has been suggested the last common ancestor of chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and humans did as well (Richmond, Begun, &amp; Strait 2001). Further, humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos all live in fission-fusion social groups characterized by shared behaviours, like male cooperation in hunting and territoriality, as well as tool use.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Primates in Culture and Religion<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the best parts of teaching anthropology for me is getting to spend time watching primates at zoos. What I also find interesting is watching people watch primates. I have very often heard a parent and child walk up to a chimpanzee enclosure and exclaim \u201cLook at the monkeys!\u201d The parent and child often don\u2019t know that a chimpanzee is not a monkey, nor are they likely to know that chimpanzees share more than 98% of their DNA with us. What strikes me as significant is that, although most people do not know the difference between a monkey, an ape, and a lemur, they nonetheless recognize something in the animals as being similar to themselves. In fact, recognition of similarities between humans and other primates is very ancient, dating back far earlier than Linnaeus. For many of us, we only ever get to see primates in zoos and animal parks, but in many areas of the world, humans have coexisted with these animals for thousands of years. In areas where humans and primates have a long, shared history, nonhuman primates often play key roles in creation myths and cultural symbolism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Hamadryas baboons feature significantly in Ancient Egyptian iconography. Ancient Egyptian deities and beliefs transformed over time, as did the role of hamadryas baboons. Early on, baboons were thought to represent dead ancestors, and one monkey deity, called Babi or Baba, was thought to feed off of dead souls. Later, baboons became the totem animal for Thoth, the deity of science, writing, wisdom, and measurement, who also wrote the Book of the Dead. Sunbathing hamadryas baboons led ancient Egyptians to associate them with Ra, the sun god, who was the son of Thoth. During mummification, human organs were removed and put into canopic jars, one of which was topped with the head of the baboon-headed god, Hapi. Hamadryas baboons were also often kept as pets, as depicted in hieroglyphics, and occasionally mummified as well.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">On Madagascar, indris and aye-ayes play roles in the creation myths and omens of local people.There are many myths regarding the origins of indris and their relationship to humans, including one where two brothers living in the forest separated, with one brother leaving the forest and becoming a human while the other stayed in the forest to become the indri. Like humans, indris have long legs, no tail, and upright posture. They are considered sacred and are therefore protected. Unfortunately, the aye-aye is not treated with the same reverence. Because of their unusual appearance (see Figure 6.15), aye-ayes are seen as omens of death.They are usually killed when encountered because it is believed that someone will die if an aye-aye points at them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In India, monkeys play a key role in the Hindu religion. Hanuman, who resembles a monkey, is a key figure in the Ramayana. Hanuman is thought to be a guardian deity, and so local monkeys like Hanuman langurs and macaques are protected in India (Figure 6.47). In Thailand, where Hinduism is also practiced, the Hindu reverence for monkeys extends to \u201cmonkey feasts,\u201d where large quantities of food are spread out in gratitude to the monkeys for bringing good fortune.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 308px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image51-1.jpg\" alt=\"Three macaques outside a temple in India.\" width=\"308\" height=\"261\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6.47: Because of important monkey-like figures in the Hindu religion, macaques are protected in India and often live near temples where they are fed by local peoples. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Macaque_India_4.jpg\">Macaque India 4<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Mosmas\">Thomas Schoch<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Mosmas\">Mosmas<\/a>) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The people of Japan have coexisted with Japanese macaques for thousands of years, and so monkeys play key roles in both of the major Japanese religions. In the Shinto religion, macaques are thought of as messengers between the spirit world and humans, and monkey symbols are thought to be good luck. The other major religion in Japan is Buddhism, and monkeys play a role in symbolism of this religion as well. The \u201cThree Wise Monkeys\u201d who see no evil, speak no evil, and hear no evil derive from Buddhist iconography of monkeys.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In Central and South America, monkeys feature often in Mayan and Aztec stories. In the Mayan creation story, the Popol Vuh, the \u201chero brothers,\u201d are actually a howler monkey and a spider monkey, who represent ancestors of humans in the story. In the Aztec religion, spider monkeys are associated with the god of arts, pleasure, and playfulness. A spider monkey is also represented in a Peruvian Nazca geoglyph, a large design made on the ground by moving rocks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In many of these regions today, the relationships between humans and nonhuman primates are complicated. The bushmeat and pet trades make these animals valuable at the expense of many animals\u2019 lives, and in some areas, nonhuman primates have become pests who raid crop fields and consume valuable foods. All of this has led to the development of a new subarea of anthropology called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1440\">Ethnoprimatology<\/a><\/strong>, which involves studying the political, economic, symbolic, and practical relationships between humans and nonhuman primates.This field highlights the particular challenges for humans of having to coexist with animals with whom we share so much in common. It also provides insight into some of the challenges facing primate conservation efforts (see Appendix B: Primate Conservation).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Order Primates is a diverse and fascinating group of animals united in sharing a suite of characteristics\u2014visual specialization, grasping hands and feet, large brains, and extended life histories\u2014that differentiates us from other groups of mammals. In this chapter, we surveyed the major taxonomic groups of primates, discussing where humans fit among our close relatives as well as discovering that primates are interesting animals in their own right. We discussed a range of key traits used to distinguish between the many taxa of living primates, including dietary, locomotor, and behavioural characteristics. Because of our long, shared evolutionary history with these animals, nonhuman primates provide a crucial resource for understanding our current biology. In Chapter 7, you will discover the fascinating and complex social behaviours of nonhuman primates, which provide further insight into our evolutionary biology.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Why does the field of anthropology, a field dedicated to the study of humans, include the study of nonhuman animals? What can we learn from nonhuman primates?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Why is it important to try to place taxa into a clade classification rather than groupings based on grade? Can you think of an example?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">One of the important goals of an introductory biological anthropology course is to teach you about your place in nature. What is the full taxonomic classification of humans, and what are some of the traits we have of each of these categories?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">When you have seen primates in person, did you observe any facial expressions, behaviours, or physical traits that seemed familiar to you? If so, which ones and why?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Draw out a tree showing the major taxonomic group of primates described here, making sure to leave room in between each level. Underneath each taxon, list some of the key features of this group so that you can compare traits between groups.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Activity pattern<\/strong>: Refers to the time of day an animal is typically active.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>African clade<\/strong>: A grouping that includes gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, humans, and their extinct relatives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Analogy<\/strong>: When two or more taxa exhibit similar traits that have evolved independently, the similar traits evolve due to similar selective pressures. (Also sometimes called convergent evolution, parallel evolution, or homoplasy.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ancestral trait<\/strong>: A trait that has been inherited from a distant ancestor.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Arboreal<\/strong>: A descriptor for an organism that spends most of its time in trees.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Asian clade<\/strong>: A grouping that includes orangutang and their extinct relatives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Bilophodont<\/strong>: Molar pattern of cercopithecoid monkeys in which there are usually four cusps that are arranged in a square pattern and connected by two ridges.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Bipedalism<\/strong>: Walking on two legs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brachiation<\/strong>: A form of locomotion in which the organism swings below branches using the forelimbs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Bunodont<\/strong>: Low, rounded cusps on the cheek teeth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Canines<\/strong>: In most primates, these are the longest of the teeth, often conical in shape and used as a weapon against predators or others of their species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cathemeral<\/strong>: Active throughout the 24-hour period.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Clade<\/strong>: A grouping based on ancestral relationships; a branch of the evolutionary tree.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cusps<\/strong>: The bumps on the chewing surface of the premolars and molars, which can be quite sharp in some species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dental formula<\/strong>: The number of each type of tooth in one quadrant of the mouth, written as number of incisors: canines: premolars: molars.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Derived trait<\/strong>: A trait that has been recently modified, most helpful when assigning taxonomic classification.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diastema<\/strong>: A space between the teeth, usually for large canines to fit when the mouth is closed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dichromatic<\/strong>: Being able to see only blues and greens.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diurnal<\/strong>: Active during the day.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dry nose<\/strong>: The nose and upper lip are separated and the upper lip can move independently; sometimes referred to as a \u201chairy\u201d or \u201cmobile\u201d upper lip.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethnoprimatology<\/strong>: A subarea of anthropology that studies the complexities of human-primate relationships in the modern environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Evolutionary trade-off<\/strong>: When an organism, which is limited in the time and energy it can put into aspects of its biology and behaviour, is shaped by natural selection to invest in one adaptation at the expense of another.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Faunivorous<\/strong>: Having a diet consisting entirely of animal matter: insects, eggs, lizards, etc.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Folivore<\/strong>: Having a diet consisting primarily of leaves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fovea<\/strong>: A depressed area in the retina at the back of the eye containing a concentration of cells that allow one to focus on objects very close to one\u2019s face.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Frugivore<\/strong>: Having a diet consisting primarily of fruit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Generalized trait<\/strong>: A trait that is useful for a wide range of tasks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grade<\/strong>: A grouping based on overall similarity in lifestyle, appearance, and behaviour.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grooming claw<\/strong>: A claw present on the second pedal digit in strepsirrhines.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gummivore<\/strong>: Having a diet consisting primarily of gums and saps.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterodont<\/strong>: Having different types of teeth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homology<\/strong>: When two or more taxa share characteristics because they inherited them from a common ancestor.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hone<\/strong>: When primates sharpen their canines by wearing them on adjacent teeth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Incisors<\/strong>: The spatula-shaped teeth at the front of the mouth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insectivore<\/strong>: Having a diet consisting primarily of insects.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ischial callosities<\/strong>: Modified seat bones of the pelvis that are flattened and over which calluses form; function as seat pads for sitting and resting atop branches.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Knuckle-walking<\/strong>: A form of quadrupedal movement used by <em>Gorilla<\/em> and <em>Pan<\/em> when on the ground, wherein the front limbs are supported on the knuckles of the hands.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Life history<\/strong>: Refers to an organism\u2019s pace of growth, reproduction, lifespan, etc.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Locomotion<\/strong>: How an organism moves around.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Male bimaturism<\/strong>: Refers to the alternative reproductive strategies in orangutans in which males can delay maturation, sometimes indefinitely, until a fully mature, \u201cflanged\u201d male disappears.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molars<\/strong>: The largest teeth at the back of the mouth; used for chewing. In primates, these teeth usually have between three and five cusps.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monochromatic<\/strong>: Being able to see only in shades of light to dark, no colour.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monomorphic<\/strong>: When males and females of a species do not exhibit significant sexual dimorphism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Natal coat<\/strong>: Refers to the contrasting fur colour of baby leaf monkeys compared to adults.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nocturnal<\/strong>: Active at night.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Olecranon process<\/strong>: Bony projection at the elbow end of the ulna.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Opposable thumb <\/strong>or <strong>opposable big toe<\/strong>: Having thumbs and toes that go in a different direction from the rest of the fingers, allows for grasping with hands and feet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pentadactyly<\/strong>: Having five digits or fingers and toes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polymorphic colour vision<\/strong>: A system in which individuals of a species vary in their abilities to see colour. In primates, it refers to males being dichromatic and females being either trichromatic or dichromatic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postorbital bar<\/strong>: A bony ring that surrounds the eye socket, open at the back.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postorbital closure\/plate<\/strong>: A bony plate that provides protection to the side and back of the eye.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Prehensile tail<\/strong>: A tail that is able to hold the full body weight of an organism, which often has a tactile pad on the underside of the tip for improved grip.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Premolars<\/strong>: Smaller than the molars, used for chewing. In primates, these teeth usually have one or two cusps.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Quadrupedalism<\/strong>: Moving around on all fours.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Rhinariums<\/strong>: Wet noses; resulting from naked skin of the nose which connects to the upper lip and smell-sensitive structures along the roof of the mouth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sagittal crest<\/strong>: A bony ridge along the top\/middle of the skull, used for attachment of chewing muscles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Scent marking<\/strong>: The behaviour of rubbing scent glands or urine onto objects as a way of communicating with others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Semi-brachiation<\/strong>: A form of locomotion in which an organism swings below branches using a combination of forelimbs and prehensile tail.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexually dimorphic<\/strong>: When a species exhibits sex differences in morphology, behaviour, hormones, and\/or colouration.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Shearing crests<\/strong>: Sharpened ridges that connect cusps on a bilophodont molar.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Specialized trait<\/strong>: A trait that has been modified for a specific purpose.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Styloid process of ulna<\/strong>: A bony projection of the ulna at the end near the wrist.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tactile pads<\/strong>: Sensitive skin at the fingertips for sense of touch. Animals with a prehensile tail have a tactile pad on the underside of the tail as well.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tapetum lucidum<\/strong>: Reflecting layer at the back of the eye that magnifies light.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Terrestrial<\/strong>: A descriptor for an organism that spends most of its time on the ground.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tetrachromatic<\/strong>: Having the ability to see reds, yellows, blues, greens, and ultraviolet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tooth comb<\/strong> or <strong>dental comb<\/strong>: A trait of the front, lower teeth of strepsirrhines in which, typically, the four incisors and canines are long and thin and protrude outward.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trichromatic colour vision<\/strong>: Being able to distinguish yellows and reds in addition to blues and greens.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vertical clinging and leaping<\/strong>: A locomotor pattern in which animals are oriented upright while clinging to vertical branches, push off with hind legs, and land oriented upright on another vertical branch.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Y-5 molar<\/strong>: Molar cusp pattern in which five molar cusps are separated by a \u201cY\u201d-shaped groove pattern.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/animaldiversity.org\/accounts\/Primates\/specimens\/\">Animal Diversity Web<\/a>.\u00a0This website is hosted by the Zoology Department at the University of Michigan. It has photographs of skulls, teeth, hands, arms, and feet of many primate species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eskeletons.org\">eSkeletons<\/a>.\u00a0This website is hosted by the Department of Anthropology at University of Texas, Austin. It is an interactive website where you can compare specific bones from different species of primates.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fleagle, John G. 2013. <em>Primate Adaptation and Evolution<\/em>. Third edition. San Diego: Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fuentes, Agust\u00edn, and Kimberley J. Hockings. 2010. \u201cThe Ethnoprimatological Approach in Primatology.\u201d <em>American Journal of Primatology<\/em> 72 (10): 841\u2013847.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rowe, Noel. 1996. <em>Pictorial Guide to the Living Primates<\/em>. Charlestown, RI: Pogonias Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Whitehead, Paul F., William K. Sacco, and Susan B. Hochgraf. 2005. <em>A Photographic Atlas for Physical Anthropology<\/em>. Englewood, CO: Morton Publishing.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Balolia, Katharine L., Christophe Soligo, and Bernard Wood. 2017. \u201cSagittal Crest Formation in Great Apes and Gibbons.\u201d <em>Journal of Anatomy<\/em> 230 (6): 820\u2013832.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bininda-Emonds, Olaf R., Marcel Cardillo, Kate E. Jones, Ross D. E. MacPhee, Robin M. D. Beck, Richard Grenyer, Samantha A. Price, Rutger A. Vos, John L. Gittleman, and Andy Purvis. 2007. \u201cThe Delayed Rise of Present-Day Mammals.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 446 (7135): 507\u2013512.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Burton, Michael L., Carmella C. Moore, John W. M. Whiting, A. Kimball Romney, David F. Aberle, Juan A. Barcelo, Malcolm M. Dow, et al. 1996. \u201cRegions Based on Social Structure.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 37 (1): 87\u2013123.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chivers, David J., and C. M. Hladik. 1980. \u201cMorphology of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Primates: Comparisons with Other Mammals in Relation to Diet.\u201d <em>Journal of Morphology<\/em> 166 (3): 337\u2013386.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Paul H. Harvey. 1980. \u201cPrimates, Brains, and Ecology.\u201d <em>Journal of Zoology<\/em> 190 (3): 309\u2013323.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dunbar, Robin I. M. 1998. \u201cThe Social Brain Hypothesis.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 6 (5): 178\u2013190.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ebersberger, Ingo, Dirk Metzler, Carsten Schwarz, and Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. 2002. \u201cGenomewide Comparison of DNA Sequences Between Humans and Chimpanzees.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 70 (6): 1490\u20131497.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jameson, Natalie M., Zhuo-Cheng Hou, Kirstin N. Sterner, Amy Weckle, Morris Goodman, Michael E. Steiper, and Derek E. Wildman. 2011. \u201cGenomic Data Reject the Hypothesis of a Prosimian Primate Clade.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 61 (3): 295\u2013305.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kawamura, Shoji, Chihiro Hiramatsu, Amanda D. Melin, Colleen M. Schaffner, Filippo Aureli, and Linda M. Fedigan. 2012. \u201cPolymorphic Color Vision in Primates: Evolutionary Considerations.\u201d In <em>Post-Genome Biology of Primates<\/em>, edited by H. Irai, H. Imai, and Y. Go, 93\u2013120. Tokyo: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Matsui, Atsushi, Felix Rakotondraparany, Isao Munechika, Masami Hasegawa, and Satoshi Horai. 2009. \u201cMolecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Prosimians Based on Complete Sequences of Mitochondrial DNAs.\u201d <em>Gene<\/em> 441 (1\u20132): 53\u201366.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nater, Alexander, Maja P. Mattle-Greminger, Anton Nurcahyo, Matthew G. Nowak, Marc de Manuel, Tariq Desai, Colin Groves, et al. 2017. \u201cMorphometric, Behavioral, and Genomic Evidence for a New Orangutan Species.\u201d <em>Current Biology<\/em> 27 (22): 3487\u20133498.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pozzi, Luca, Jason A. Hodgson, Andrew S. Burrell, Kirstin N. Sterner, Ryan L. Raaum, and Todd R. Disotell. 2014. \u201cPrimate Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Dates Inferred from Complete Mitochondrial Genomes.\u201d <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution<\/em> 75: 165\u2013183.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Remis, Melissa J. 1997. \u201cWestern Lowland Gorillas (<em>Gorilla gorilla gorilla<\/em>) as Seasonal Frugivores: Use of Variable Resources.\u201d <em>American Journal of Primatology<\/em> 43 (2): 87\u2013109.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richmond, Brian G., David R. Begun, and David S. Strait. 2001. \u201cOrigin of Human Bipedalism: The Knuckle\u2010Walking Hypothesis Revisited.\u201d <em>American<\/em> <em>Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 116 (S33): 70\u2013105.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robson, Shannen L., Carel P. van Schaik, and Kristen Hawkes. 2006. \u201cThe Derived Features of Human Life History.\u201d In <em>The Evolution of Human Life History, edited by Kristen Hawkes and Richard R. Paine, <\/em>17\u201344. Santa Fe: SAR Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scally, Aylwyn, Julien Y. Dutheil, LaDeana W. Hillier, Gregory E. Jordan, Ian Goodhead, Javier Herrero, Asger Hobolth, et al. 2012. \u201cInsights into Hominid Evolution from the Gorilla Genome Sequence.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 483 (7388): 169\u2013175.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Schneider, Horacio, and Iracilda Sampaio. 2015. \u201cThe Systematics and Evolution of New World Primates: A Review.\u201d <em>Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution<\/em> 82 (B): 348\u2013357.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Setchell, Joanna M., Phyllis C. Lee, E. Jean Wickings, and Alan F. Dixson. 2001. \u201cGrowth and Ontogeny of Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Mandrill (<em>Mandrillus sphinx<\/em>).\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 115 (4): 349\u2013360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Utami, Sri Suci, Beno\u00eet Goossens, Michael W. Bruford, Jan R. de Ruiter, and Jan A. R. A. M. van Hooff. 2002. \u201cMale Bimaturism and Reproductive Success in Sumatran Orang-utans.\u201d <em>Behavioral Ecology<\/em> 13 (5): 643\u2013652.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Vasey, Natalie. 2006. \u201cImpact of Seasonality and Reproduction on Social Structure, Ranging Patterns, and Fission\u2013Fusion Social Organization in Red Ruffed Lemurs.\u201d In <em>Lemurs: Ecology and Adaptation<\/em>, edited by Lisa Gould and Michelle L. Sauther, 275\u2013304. New York: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wright, Patricia C. 1999. \u201cLemur Traits and Madagascar Ecology: Coping with an Island Environment.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 110 (S29): 31\u201372.<\/p>\n<h2>Acknowledgements<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The author would very much like to thank the editors for the opportunity to contribute to this textbook, along with anonymous reviewers who provided useful feedback on earlier drafts of this chapter. She would particularly like to thank Karin Enstam Jaffe for her support and encouragement during the writing of this chapter and its revision. Most of all, the author would like to thank all of the Introduction to Biological Anthropology students that she has had over the years who have listened to her lecture endlessly on these animals that she finds so fascinating and who have helped her to hone her pedagogy in a field that she loves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1583\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1583\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Andrea J. Alveshere, Ph.D., Western Illinois University<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors for this chapter: Corin Laberge, Hazel Moorcroft, Isabella Michel, Julian J. Pantoja Quiroz<\/h6>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\"><em>Chapter 4: Forces of Evolution<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Andrea J. Alveshere. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Outline a 21st-century perspective of the Modern Synthesis.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Define populations and population genetics as well as the methods used to study them.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the forces of evolution and become familiar with examples of each.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss the evolutionary significance of mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how allele frequencies can be used to study evolution as it happens.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Contrast micro- and macroevolution.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>It\u2019s hard for us, with our typical human life spans of less than 100 years, to imagine all the way back, 3.8 billion years ago, to the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1442\">origins of life<\/a><\/strong>. Scientists still study and debate how life came into being and whether it originated on Earth or in some other region of the universe (including some scientists who believe that studying evolution can reveal the complex processes that were set in motion by God or a higher power). What we do know is that a living single-celled organism was present on Earth during the early stages of our planet\u2019s existence. This organism had the potential to reproduce by making copies of itself, just like bacteria, many amoebae, and our own living cells today. In fact, with modern technologies, we can now trace genetic lineages, or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1290\">phylogenies<\/a><\/strong>, and determine the relationships between all of today\u2019s living organisms\u2014eukaryotes (animals, plants, fungi, etc.), archaea, and bacteria\u2014on the branches of the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1444\">phylogenetic tree of life<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 5.1).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 675px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/02\/image1-1.png\" alt=\"Branches lead off of a single celled universal ancestor to images of bacteria, archaea, and eukarya (represented by a mouse, mushroom, and fern, among others).\" width=\"675\" height=\"475\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.1: Phylogenetic tree of life illustrating probable relationships between the single-celled Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) and select examples of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. Major evolutionary developments, including independent evolution of multicellularity, photosynthesis, and respiration, are indicated along the branches. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a class=\"rId11\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Cladograma_dos_Dom%C3%ADnios_e_Reinos.png\">Cladograma dos Dominios e Reinos<\/a> by <a class=\"rId12\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:MarceloTeles\">MarceloTeles<\/a> has been modified (English labels replace Portuguese) and is under a <a class=\"rId13\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>..<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Looking at the common sequences in modern genomes, we can even make educated guesses about the likely genetic sequence of the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1446\"><strong>Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA)<\/strong><\/a> of all living things. Through a wondrous series of mechanisms and events over nearly four billion years, that ancient single-celled organism gave rise to the rich diversity of species that fill the lands, seas, and skies of our planet. This chapter explores the mechanisms by which that amazing transformation occurred and considers some of the crucial scientific experiments that shaped our current understanding of the evolutionary process.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Population Genetics<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Defining Populations and the Variations <\/strong><strong>w<\/strong><strong>ithin Them<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the major breakthroughs in understanding the mechanisms of evolutionary change came with the realization that evolution takes place at the level of populations, not within individuals. In the biological sciences, a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1454\"><strong>p<\/strong><strong>opulation<\/strong><\/a> is defined as a group of individuals of the same <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1456\"><strong>species<\/strong><\/a> who are geographically near enough to one another that they can breed and produce new generations of individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For the purpose of studying evolution, we recognize populations by their even smaller units: genes. Remember, a\u00a0<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1458\"><strong>gene<\/strong><\/a> is the basic unit of information that encodes the proteins needed to grow and function as a living organism. Each gene can have multiple <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_738\">alleles<\/a><\/strong>, or variants\u2014each of which may produce a slightly different protein. Each individual, for genetic inheritance purposes, carries a collection of genes that can be passed down to future generations. For this reason, in population genetics, we think of populations as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1462\"><strong>gene pools<\/strong><\/a>, which refers to the entire collection of genetic material in a breeding community that can be passed on from one generation to the next.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For genes carried on our human chromosomes (our nuclear DNA), we inherit two copies of each, one from each parent. This means we may carry two of the same alleles (a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1464\"><strong>homozygous genotype<\/strong><\/a>) or two different alleles (a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1466\"><strong>heterozygous<\/strong> <strong>genotype<\/strong><\/a>) for each nuclear gene.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Defining Evolution <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In order to understand evolution, it\u2019s crucial to remember that evolution is always studied at the population level. Also, if a population were to stay exactly the same from one generation to the next, it would not be evolving. So evolution requires both a population of breeding individuals and some kind of a genetic change occurring within it. Thus, the simple definition of <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1468\"><strong>evolution<\/strong><\/a> is a change in the allele frequencies in a population over time. What do we mean by allele frequencies? <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1470\"><strong>Allele frequencies<\/strong> <\/a>refer to the ratio, or percentage, of one allele (one variant of a gene) compared to the other alleles for that gene within the study population (Figure 5.2). By contrast, <strong>genotype frequencies<\/strong> are the ratios or percentages of the different homozygous and heterozygous genotypes in the population. Because we carry two alleles per <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_736\">genotype<\/a><\/strong>, the total count of alleles in a population will usually be exactly double the total count of genotypes in the same population (with the exception being rare cases in which an individual carries a different number of chromosomes than the typical two; e.g., Down syndrome results when a child carries three copies of Chromosome 21).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 652px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2.jpg\" alt=\"Genotypes are represented as combinations of alleles and allele frequencies.\" width=\"652\" height=\"883\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.2: Population evolution can be measured by allele frequency changes. This diagram illustrates the differences between genotype frequencies and allele frequencies, as well as how they can be measured in a population of snapdragon flowers. The lower portion of the diagram also depicts how evolution is recognized as allele frequencies change in a population over time. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>.\u00a0Credit: Population evolution original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Katie Nelson and Beth Shook is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/vectors\/snapdragon-flower-pink-lilac-plant-146850\/\">Snapdragon-flower-pink-lilac<\/a> by <a class=\"rId17\" href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/openclipart-vectors-30363\/\">OpenClipart-Vectors<\/a>, <a class=\"rId18\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a> under a <a class=\"rId19\" href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/\">Pixabay License<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Forces of Evolution<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Today, we recognize that evolution takes place through a combination of mechanisms: mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection. These mechanisms are called the \u201cforces of evolution\u201d; together they account for all the genotypic variation observed in the world today. Keep in mind that each of these forces was first defined and then tested\u2014and retested\u2014through the experimental work of the many scientists who contributed to the Modern Synthesis.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutation<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The first force of evolution we will discuss is mutation, and for good reason: mutation is the original source of all the genetic variation found in every living thing. Imagine all the way back in time to the very first single-celled organism, floating in Earth\u2019s primordial sea. Based on what we observe in simple, single-celled organisms today, that organism probably spent its lifetime absorbing nutrients and dividing to produce cloned copies of itself. While the numbers of individuals in that population would have grown (as long as the environment was favorable), nothing would have changed in that perfectly cloned population. There would not have been variety among the individuals. It was only through a copying error\u2014the introduction of a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1474\"><strong>mutation<\/strong><\/a>, or change, into the genetic code\u2014that new alleles were introduced into the population.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><br style=\"clear: both\" \/>After many generations have passed in our primordial population, mutations have created distinct chromosomes. The cells are now amoeba-like, larger than many of their tiny bacterial neighbors, who have long since become their favorite source of nutrients. Without mutation to create this diversity, all living things would still be identical to LUCA, our universal ancestor (Figure 5.3).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 663px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-2.png\" alt=\"Universal Ancestor linked to the Eukarya branch.\" width=\"663\" height=\"338\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.3: Key mutational differences between Last Universal Common Ancestor and an amoeba-like primordial cell. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit<strong>: <\/strong>Key differences between LUCA and a primordial cell original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId21\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId22\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Cladograma_dos_Dom%C3%ADnios_e_Reinos.png\">Cladograma dos Dominios e Reinos<\/a> by <a class=\"rId23\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:MarceloTeles\">MarceloTeles<\/a> (cropped, labels and colour changed), <a class=\"rId24\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a><a class=\"rId25\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">; <\/a><a class=\"rId26\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId27\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId28\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (cropped and colour changed), <a class=\"rId29\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When we think of genetic mutation, we often first think of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1476\">deleterious mutations<\/a><\/strong>\u2014the ones associated with negative effects such as the beginnings of cancers or heritable disorders. The fact is, though, that every genetic adaptation that has helped our ancestors survive since the dawn of life is directly due to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1478\">beneficial mutations<\/a><\/strong>\u2014changes in the DNA that provided some sort of advantage to a given population at a particular moment in time. For example, a beneficial mutation allowed chihuahuas and other tropical-adapted dog breeds to have much thinner fur coats than their cold-adapted cousins the northern wolves, malamutes, and huskies.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 320px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-1-1.png\" alt=\"UV radiation damages nucleotides in DNA.\" width=\"320\" height=\"248\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.4: A crosslinking mutation in which a UV photon induces a bond between two thymine bases. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit<strong>: <\/strong><a class=\"rId31\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">UV-induced Thymine dimer mutation (Figure 4.6)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId32\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId33\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Every one of us has genetic mutations. Yes, even you. The DNA in some of your cells today differs from the original DNA that you inherited when you were a tiny, fertilized egg. Mutations occur all the time in the cells of our skin and other organs, due to chemical changes in the nucleotides. Exposure to the UV radiation in sunlight is one common cause of skin mutations. Interaction with UV light causes <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1480\"><strong>UV crosslinking<\/strong><\/a>, in which adjacent thymine bases bind with one another (Figure 5.4). Many of these mutations are detected and corrected by <strong>DNA repair mechanisms<\/strong>, enzymes that patrol and repair DNA in living cells, while other mutations may cause a new freckle or mole or, perhaps, an unusual hair to grow. For people with the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1484\">autosomal recessive<\/a><\/strong> disease <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1486\"><strong>xeroderma pigmentosum<\/strong><\/a>, these repair mechanisms do not function correctly, resulting in a host of problems especially related to sun exposure, including severe sunburns, dry skin, heavy freckling, and other pigment changes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Most of our mutations exist in <strong>somatic<\/strong> cells, which are the cells of our organs and other body tissues. Those will not be passed onto future generations and so will not affect the population over time. Only mutations that occur in the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_686\">gametes<\/a><\/strong>, the reproductive cells (i.e., the sperm or egg cells), will be passed onto future generations. When a new mutation pops up at random in a family lineage, it is known as a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1490\"><strong>spontaneous mutation<\/strong><\/a>. If the individual born with this spontaneous mutation passes it on to his offspring, those offspring receive an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1492\">inherited mutation<\/a><\/strong>. Geneticists have identified many classes of mutations and the causes and effects of many of these.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Point Mutations<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1494\">point mutation<\/a><\/strong> is a single-letter (single-nucleotide) change in the genetic code resulting in the substitution of one nucleic acid base for a different one. As you learned in Chapter 4, the DNA code in each gene is translated through three-letter \u201cwords\u201d known as <strong>codons<\/strong>. So depending on how the point mutation changes the \u201cword,\u201d the effect it will have on the protein may be major or minor or may make no difference at all.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">If a mutation does not change the resulting protein, then it is called a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1496\">synonymous mutation<\/a><\/strong>. Synonymous mutations do involve a letter (nucleic acid) change, but that change results in a codon that codes for the same \u201cinstruction\u201d (the same amino acid or stop code) as the original codon. Mutations that do cause a change in the protein are known as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1498\"><strong>nonsynonymous mutations<\/strong>.<\/a> Nonsynonymous mutations may change the resulting protein\u2019s amino acid sequence by altering the DNA sequence that encodes the mRNA or by changing how the mRNA is spliced prior to translation (refer to Chapter 4 for more details).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Insertions and Deletions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In addition to point mutations, another class of mutations are <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1500\"><strong>insertions<\/strong><\/a> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1504\">deletions<\/a><\/strong>, or <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1502\"><strong>indels<\/strong><\/a>, for short. As the name suggests, these involve the addition (insertion) or removal (deletion) of one or more coding sequence letters (nucleic acids). These typically first occur as an error in DNA replication, wherein one or more nucleotides are either duplicated or skipped in error. Entire codons or sets of codons may also be removed or added if the indel is a multiple of three nucleotides.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1506\"><strong>Frameshift<\/strong> <strong>mutations<\/strong><\/a> are types of indels that involve the insertion or deletion of any number of nucleotides that is not a multiple of three (e.g., adding one or two extra letters to the code). Because these indels are not consistent with the codon numbering, they \u201cshift the reading frame,\u201d causing all the codons beyond the mutation to be misread. Like point mutations, small indels can also disrupt splice sites.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1508\">Transposable elements<\/a><\/strong>, or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1510\">transposons<\/a><\/strong>, are fragments of DNA that can \u201cjump\u201d around in the genome. There are two types of transposons: <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1512\">retrotransposons<\/a><\/strong> are transcribed from DNA into RNA and then \u201creverse transcribed,\u201d to insert the copied sequence into a new location in the DNA, and<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1514\">DNA transposons<\/a><\/strong>, which do not involve RNA. DNA transposons are clipped out of the DNA sequence itself and inserted elsewhere in the genome. Because transposable elements insert themselves into existing DNA sequences, they are frequent gene disruptors. At certain times, and in certain species, it appears that transposons became very active, likely accelerating the mutation rate (and thus, the genetic variation) in those populations during the active periods.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Chromosomal Alterations <\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The final major category of genetic mutations are changes at the chromosome level: crossover events, nondisjunction events, and translocations. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1516\"><strong>Crossover events<\/strong> <\/a> occur when DNA is swapped between homologous chromosomes while they are paired up during meiosis I. Crossovers are thought to be so common that some DNA swapping may happen every time chromosomes go through meiosis I. Crossovers don\u2019t necessarily introduce new alleles into a population, but they do make it possible for new combinations of alleles to exist on a single chromosome that can be passed to future generations. This also enables new combinations of alleles to be found within siblings who share the same parents. Also, if the fragments that cross over don\u2019t break at exactly the same point, they can cause genes to be deleted from one of the homologous chromosomes and duplicated on the other.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1518\">Nondisjunction events<\/a><\/strong> occur when the homologous chromosomes (in meiosis I) or sister chromatids (in meiosis II and mitosis) fail to separate after pairing. The result is that both chromosomes or chromatids end up in the same daughter cell, leaving the other daughter cell without any copy of that chromosome (Figure 5.5). Most nondisjunctions at the gamete level are fatal to the embryo. The most widely known exception is Trisomy 21, or Down syndrome, which results when an embryo inherits three copies of Chromosome 21: two from one parent (due to a nondisjunction event) and one from the other (Figure 5.6). <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1520\">Trisomies<\/a> <\/strong>(triple chromosome conditions) of Chromosomes 18 (Edwards syndrome) and 13 (Patau syndrome) are also known to result in live births, but the children usually have severe complications and rarely survive beyond the first year of life.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 601px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5.jpg\" alt=\"Egg cell undergoes normal meiosis and nondisjunction in meisosis 1.\" width=\"601\" height=\"391\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.5: Illustration of an egg cell (oocyte) undergoing normal meiosis 1, resulting in a diploid daughter cell, compared to an egg cell undergoing nondisjunction during meiosis 1, resulting in a trisomy in the daughter cell. Credit: <a class=\"rId35\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Trisomy_due_to_nondisjunction_in_maternal_meiosis_1.png\">Trisomy due to nondisjunction in maternal meiosis 1<\/a> by Wpeissner has been modified (labels deleted by Katie Nelson) and is under a <a class=\"rId36\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 316px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-1.jpg\" alt=\"A young woman in a blue polo shirt smiles at the camera.\" width=\"316\" height=\"364\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.6: Amy Bockerstette, a competitive golfer and disabilities advocate, also has Down Syndrome. Credit: <a class=\"rId38\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amy_Bockerstette_Headshot.jpg\">Amy Bockerstette Headshot<\/a> by Bucksgrandson is under a <a class=\"rId39\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sex chromosome trisomies (XXX, XXY, XYY) and X chromosome <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1522\"><strong>monosomies<\/strong> <\/a>(inheritance of an X chromosome from one parent and no sex chromosome from the other) are also survivable and fairly common. The symptoms vary but often include atypical sexual characteristics, either at birth or at puberty, and often result in sterility. The X chromosome carries unique genes that are required for survival; therefore, Y chromosome monosomies are incompatible with life.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1524\"><strong>Chromosomal translocations<\/strong><\/a> involve transfers of DNA between nonhomologous chromosomes. This may involve swapping large portions of two or more chromosomes. The exchanges of DNA may be balanced or unbalanced. In <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1526\"><strong>balanced translocations<\/strong><\/a>, the genes are swapped, but no genetic information is lost. In <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1528\">unbalanced translocations<\/a><\/strong>, there is an unequal exchange of genetic material, resulting in duplication or loss of genes. Translocations result in new chromosomal structures called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1530\"><strong>derivative chromosomes<\/strong><\/a>, because they are derived or created from two different chromosomes<em>. <\/em>Translocations are often found to be linked to cancers and can also cause infertility. Even if the translocations are balanced in the parent, the embryo often won\u2019t survive unless the baby inherits both of that parent\u2019s derivative chromosomes (to maintain the balance).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genetic Drift<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The second force of evolution is commonly known as genetic drift. This is an unfortunate misnomer, as this force actually involves the drifting of alleles, not genes. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1532\"><strong>Genetic <\/strong><strong>d<\/strong><strong>rift<\/strong><\/a> refers to <em>random<\/em> changes (\u201cdrift\u201d) in allele frequencies from one generation to the next. The genes are remaining constant within the population; it is only the alleles of the genes that are changing in frequency. The random nature of genetic drift is a crucial point to understand: it specifically occurs when none of the variant alleles confer an advantage.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 368px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-2.png\" alt=\"A smooth cell has a gently curving exterior surface, and a ruffled cell has undulating surface.\" width=\"368\" height=\"215\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.7: Smooth and ruffled amoeba-like cells. Credit: Smooth and ruffled amoeba-like cells original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId41\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId42\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId43\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId44\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId45\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Let\u2019s imagine far back in time, again, to that ancient population of amoeba-like cells, subsisting and occasionally dividing, in the primordial sea. A mutation occurs in one of the cells that changes the texture of the cell membrane from a relatively smooth surface to a highly ruffled one (Figure 5.7). This has absolutely no effect on the cell\u2019s quality of life or ability to reproduce. In fact, eyes haven\u2019t evolved yet, so no one in the world at the time would even notice the difference. The cells in the population continue to divide, and the offspring of the ruffled cell inherit the ruffled membrane. The frequency (percentage) of the ruffled allele in the population, from one generation to the next, will depend entirely on how many offspring that first ruffled cell ends up having, and the random events that might make the ruffled alleles more common or more rare (such as population bottlenecks and founder effects, which are discussed below).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Sexual Reproduction and Random Inheritance<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tracking alleles gets a bit more complicated in our primordial cells when, after a number of generations, a series of mutations have created populations that reproduce sexually. These cells now must go through an extra round of cell division (meiosis) to create haploid gametes. The combination of two gametes is now required to produce each new diploid offspring.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 262px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-1.png\" alt=\"A Punnett square with ruffled and smooth cells.\" width=\"262\" height=\"262\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.8: A Punnett square demonstrating the sexual inheritance pattern of ruffled (dominant) and smooth amoeba-like primordial cells. Credit: Punnett square of primordial cells original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId47\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId48\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId49\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId50\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId51\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>; <a class=\"rId52\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Punnett_hetero_x_hetero.svg\">Punnett Hetero x Hetero<\/a> by <a class=\"rId53\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=User:Purpy_Pupple&amp;redirect=no\">Purpy Pupple<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId54\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0<\/a>].<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the earlier population, which reproduced via <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1534\">asexual reproduction<\/a><\/strong>, a cell either carried the smooth allele or the ruffled allele. With <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1536\">sexual reproduction<\/a><\/strong>, a cell inherits one allele from each parent, so there are homozygous cells that contain two smooth alleles, homozygous cells that contain two ruffled alleles, and heterozygous cells that contain one of each allele (Figure 5.8). If the new, ruffled allele happens to be dominant (and we\u2019ll imagine that it is), the heterozygotes will have ruffled cell <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1238\"><strong>phenotypes<\/strong><\/a> but also will have a 50\/50 chance of passing on a smooth allele to each offspring. As long as neither phenotype (ruffled nor smooth) provides any advantage over the other, the variation in the population from one generation to the next will remain completely random.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In sexually reproducing populations (including humans and many other animals and plants in the world today), that 50\/50 chance of inheriting one or the other allele from each parent plays a major role in the random nature of genetic drift.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Population Bottlenecks <\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1538\"><strong>population bottleneck<\/strong><\/a> occurs when the number of individuals in a population drops dramatically due to some random event. The most obvious, familiar examples are natural disasters. Tsunamis and hurricanes devastating island and coastal populations and forest fires and river floods wiping out populations in other areas are all too familiar. When a large portion of a population is randomly wiped out, the allele frequencies (i.e., the percentages of each allele) in the small population of survivors are often much different from the frequencies in the predisaster, or \u201cparent,\u201d population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">If such an event happened to our primordial ocean cell population\u2014perhaps a volcanic fissure erupted in the ocean floor and only the cells that happened to be farthest from the spewing lava and boiling water survived\u2014we might end up, by random chance, with a surviving population that had mostly ruffled alleles, in contrast to the parent population, which had only a small percentage of ruffles (Figure 5.9).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 665px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-2.png\" alt=\"Ruffled and smooth cells experience population bottleneck when a lava flow divides the populations.\" width=\"665\" height=\"332\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.9: Illustration of a population of amoeba-like cells shifting from primarily smooth phenotypes (at left) to mostly ruffled phenotypes due to eruption of a volcanic fissure (at right) that exterminated the nearest cells. Credit: Population of amoeba-like cells and volcanic fissure original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId56\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId57\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId58\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId59\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId60\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the most famous examples of a population bottleneck is the prehistoric disaster that led to the extinction of dinosaurs, the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1540\"><strong>Cretaceous\u2013Paleogene <\/strong><strong>extinction<\/strong><\/a> event (often abbreviated K\u2013Pg; previously K-T). This occurred approximately 66 million years ago. Dinosaurs and all their neighbors were going about their ordinary routines when a massive asteroid zoomed in from space and crashed into what is now the Gulf of Mexico, creating an impact so enormous that populations within hundreds of miles of the crash site were likely immediately wiped out. The skies filled with dust and debris, causing temperatures to plummet worldwide. It\u2019s estimated that 75% of the world\u2019s species went extinct as a result of the impact and the deep freeze that followed (Jablonski and Chaloner 1994).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 399px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-2.png\" alt=\" A rat-like creature sits atop a dinosaur, raising a fist in a victorious gesture.\" width=\"399\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.10: The Cretaceous\u2013Paleogene extinction event, which led to the fall of the dinosaurs and rise of the mammals. Credit: <a class=\"rId62\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">The<\/a> <a class=\"rId64\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Cretaceous\u2013Paleogene extinction event (Figure 4.12)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId65\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId66\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The populations that emerged from the K-Pg extinction were markedly different from their pre-disaster communities. Surviving mammal populations expanded and diversified, and other new creatures appeared. The ecosystems of Earth were filled with new organisms and have never been the same (Figure 5.10).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Much more recently in geological time, during the colonial period, many human populations experienced bottlenecks as a result of the fact that imperial powers were inclined to slaughter communities who were reluctant to give up their lands and resources. This effect was especially profound in the Americas, where Indigenous populations faced the compounded effects of brutal warfare, exposure to new bacteria and viruses (against which they had no immunity), and ultimately segregation on resource-starved reservations. The populations in Europe, Asia, and Africa had experienced regular gene flow during the 10,000-year period in which most kinds of livestock were being domesticated, giving them many generations of experience building up immunity against zoonotic diseases (those that can pass from animals to humans). In contrast, the residents of the Americas had been almost completely isolated during those millennia, so all these diseases swept through the Americas in rapid succession, creating a major loss of genetic diversity in the Indigenous American population. It is estimated that between 50% and 95% of the Indigenous American populations died during the first decades after European contact, around 500 years ago (Livi-Bacci 2006).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An urgent health challenge facing humans today involves human-induced population bottlenecks that produce antibiotic-resistant bacteria. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1451\"><strong>Antibiotics<\/strong> <\/a>are medicines prescribed to treat bacterial infections. The typical prescription includes enough medicine for ten days. People often feel better much sooner than ten days and sometimes decide to quit taking the medicine ahead of schedule. This is often a big mistake. The antibiotics have quickly killed off a large percentage of the bacteria\u2014enough to reduce the symptoms and make you feel much better. However, this has created a bacterial population bottleneck. There are usually a small number of bacteria that survive those early days. If you take the medicine as prescribed for the full ten days, it\u2019s quite likely that there will be no bacterial survivors. If you quit early, though, the survivors\u2014who were the members of the original population who were most resistant to the antibiotic\u2014will begin to reproduce again. Soon the infection will be back, possibly worse than before, and now all of the bacteria are resistant to the antibiotic that you had been prescribed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other activities that have contributed to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria include the use of antibacterial cleaning products and the inappropriate use of antibiotics as a preventative measure in livestock or to treat infections that are viral instead of bacterial (viruses do not respond to antibiotics). In 2017, the World Health Organization published a list of twelve antibiotic-resistant pathogens that are considered top priority targets for the development of new antibiotics (World Health Organization 2017).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Dig Deeper: The North American Elephant Seal: Thriving Bottleneck Populations That Still Face Genetic Defects<\/h2>\n<p>In 1892, the Northern Elephant Seal underwent a severe population bottleneck caused by commercial hunting, reducing the species to an estimated 20 individuals at the time. This drastic decline led to a substantial loss of genetic diversity\u2013a common consequence of extreme population bottlenecks (Hoelzel Et al., 2024 &amp; Weber Et al., 2000). While the population has since recovered to over 200,000 individuals, its genetic variability remains significantly low. Analyses of genetic markers, including allozymes, mitochondrial DNA, and microsatellites, consistently reflect this reduced diversity (Hoelzel Et al., 2024). Comparative studies further underscore this loss by highlighting the higher genetic variation observed in the Southern Elephant Seal, which did not experience similar population constraints (2024).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 386px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/4\/48\/Elephant_seals_at_Ano_Nuevo_%2891577%29.jpg\/250px-Elephant_seals_at_Ano_Nuevo_%2891577%29.jpg\" alt=\"File:Elephant seals at Ano Nuevo (91577).jpg\" width=\"386\" height=\"295\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.11 A male northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) with two pups at Ano Nuevo State Park. Credit: Elephant seals at Ano Nuevo by Rhododendrites is under <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In a 2024 study for Nature, Ecology, and Evolution, Hoelzel and colleagues sequenced 260 modern and 8 historical genomes of the northern elephant seal. This comparison revealed a decrease in average heterozygosity from 0.00142 before the bottleneck to 0.000176 in the contemporary population, confirming the decline in genetic variation (2024). Hoelzel\u2019s mitogenome tree further illustrates this loss, revealing only two significant lineages remaining post-bottleneck, with limited diversity within each. Among the issues of diversity, the population has shown an increased number of loss-of-function (LOF) alleles, suggesting that increased inbreeding has amplified the frequency of these detrimental alleles; this reduced genetic diversity negatively affects both male and female reproductive fitness. Females who practiced repetitive inbreeding had higher LOF alleles and subsequently weaned fewer pups per year over their lifetime, while male reproductive success was linked to specific LOF loci associated with sperm production (2024). Hoelzel uses the example of \u201cAlpha-Male M12\u201d\u2013known for low paternity success despite frequent copulations\u2013which was homozygous for non-functional versions of four out of five LOF loci related to sperm function (2024, p. 688). The species' mating system, characterized by extreme polygyny, further exacerbates the loss of genetic variation even with countless copulatory partners<\/p>\n<p>Prior research published in Current Biology presents an empirical genetic assessment of this population bottleneck, highlighting its long-term genetic consequences, particularly the loss of mitochondrial diversity (Weber et al., 2000). In this research, Weber and colleagues note that random lineage sampling during the bottleneck led to the persistence of specific genetic variants by chance rather than through natural selection (2000). This research emphasizes that the loss of diversity poses potential future genetic vulnerabilities for the seals, and that further studies are crucial for understanding the full scope of these impacts on the seals' overall fitness (2000). In 2024, the work led by Hoelzen and company provided the missing data that the previous study had left unanswered. Their previously explored findings indicate that, although the seals have recovered in numbers, their genetic resilience remains compromised, leaving the population more vulnerable to future environmental pressures, such as climate change or resource shortages (Hoelzel Et al., 2024). Ultimately, while the population's size remains stable, the genetic consequences of the bottleneck indicate that past stochastic events continue to influence the seals' long-term fitness and adaptability.<\/p>\n<p>This research indicates that the historical bottleneck continues to affect the seals' health and fitness, despite the population's recovery. Limited genetic diversity and the persistence of harmful alleles due to inbreeding have continued to handicap the species' ability to thrive in environmental challenges such as climate change and resource fluctuations (2024). This emphasizes the importance of incorporating genetic factors into conservation strategies, as populations that have rebounded may still harbour long-term genetic weaknesses. Moreover, the elephant seal\u2019s history serves as a powerful example of how human actions \u2014such as overhunting \u2014 can have long-lasting impacts on biodiversity, reinforcing the importance of understanding human-environment interactions in ecological and conservation contexts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Founder Effects<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1452\"><strong>Founder effects<\/strong><\/a> occur when members of a population leave the main or \u201cparent\u201d group and form a new population that no longer interbreeds with the other members of the original group. Similar to survivors of a population bottleneck, the newly founded population often has allele frequencies that are different from the original group. Alleles that may have been relatively rare in the parent population can end up being very common due to the founder effect. Likewise, recessive traits that were seldom seen in the parent population may be seen frequently in the descendants of the offshoot population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One striking example of the founder effect was first noted in the Dominican Republic in the 1970s. During a several-year period, eighteen children who had been born with female genitalia and raised as girls suddenly grew penises at puberty. This culture tended to value sons over daughters, so these transitions were generally celebrated. They labeled the condition <em><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1453\">guevedoces<\/a><\/strong><\/em>, which translates to \u201cpenis at twelve,\u201d due to the average age at which this occurred. Scientists were fascinated by the phenomenon.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic and hormonal studies revealed that the condition, scientifically termed <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1454\">5-alpha reductase deficiency<\/a>,<\/strong> is an autosomal recessive syndrome that manifests when a child having both X and Y sex chromosomes inherits two nonfunctional (mutated) copies of the <em>SRD5A2 <\/em>gene (Imperato-McGinley &amp; Zhu 2002). These children develop testes internally, but the 5-alpha reductase 2 steroid, which is necessary for development of male genitals in babies, is not produced. In absence of this male hormone, the baby develops female-looking genitalia (in humans, \u201cfemale\u201d is the default infant body form, if the full set of the necessary male hormones are not produced). At puberty, however, a different set of male hormones are produced by other fully functional genes. These hormones complete the male genital development that did not happen in infancy. This condition became quite common in the Dominican Republic during the 1970s due to founder effect\u2014that is, the mutated <em>SRD5A2<\/em>\u00a0gene happened to be much more common among the Dominican Republic\u2019s founding population than in the parent populations. (The Dominican population derives from a mixture of Indigenous Americans [Taino] peoples, West Africans, and Western Europeans.) Five-alpha reductase syndrome has since been observed in other small, isolated populations around the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Founder effect is closely linked to the concept of inbreeding, which in population genetics does not necessarily mean breeding with immediate family relatives. Instead, <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1455\"><strong>inbreeding<\/strong> <\/a> refers to the selection of mates exclusively from within a small, closed population\u2014that is, from a group with limited allelic variability. This can be observed in small, physically isolated populations but also can happen when cultural practices limit mates to a small group. As with the founder effect, inbreeding increases the risk of inheriting two copies of any nonfunctional (mutant) alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Amish in the United States are a population that, due to their unique history and cultural practices, emerged from a small founding population and have tended to select mates from within their groups. The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1456\">Old Order Amish<\/a><\/strong> population of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, has approximately 50,000 current members, all of whom can trace their ancestry back to a group of approximately 80 individuals. This small founding population immigrated to the United States from Switzerland in the mid-1700s to escape religious persecution. Since the Amish keep to themselves and almost exclusively select mates from within their own communities, they have more recessive traits compared to their parent population.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 441px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-1.jpg\" alt=\"One individual\u2019s hands with six fingers.\" width=\"441\" height=\"331\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.12: A person displaying polydactyly. Credit: <a class=\"rId68\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:6_Finger.JPG\">6 Finger<\/a> by Wilhelmy is under a <a class=\"rId69\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the genetic conditions that has been observed much more frequently in the Lancaster County Amish population is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1457\">Ellis-van Creveld syndrome<\/a><\/strong>, which is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by short stature (dwarfism), polydactyly (the development of more than five digits [fingers or toes] on the hands or feet], abnormal tooth development, and heart defects (Figure 5.12). Among the general world population, Ellis-van Creveld syndrome is estimated to affect approximately 1 in 60,000 individuals; among the Old Order Amish of Lancaster County, the rate is estimated to be as high as 1 in every 200 births (D\u2019Asdia Et al. 2013).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One important insight that has come from the study of founder effects is that a limited gene pool carries a much higher risk for genetic diseases. Genetic diversity in a population greatly reduces these risks.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene Flow<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The third force of evolution is traditionally called gene flow. As with genetic drift, this is a misnomer, because it refers to flowing alleles, not genes. (All members of the same species share the same genes; it is the alleles of those genes that may vary.) <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1459\"><strong>Gene <\/strong><strong>f<\/strong><strong>low<\/strong> <\/a> refers to the movement of alleles from one population to another. In most cases, gene flow can be considered synonymous with migration.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Returning again to the example of our primordial cell population, let\u2019s imagine that, after the volcanic fissure opened up in the ocean floor, wiping out the majority of the parent population, two surviving populations developed in the waters on opposite sides of the fissure. Ultimately, the lava from the fissure cooled into a large island that continued to provide a physical barrier between the populations (Figure 5.13).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 685px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-2.png\" alt=\"An illustration of gene flow.\" width=\"685\" height=\"342\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.13: Smooth and predominantly ruffled amoeba-like populations separated by a volcanic eruption (at left) and an island (at right) with unidirectional gene flow moving from east to west with ocean currents. Credit: Population of amoeba-like cells separated by volcanic eruption original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId74\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId75\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId76\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId77\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId78\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the initial generations after the eruption, due to founder effect, isolation, and random inheritance (genetic drift), the population to the west of the islands contained a vast majority of the ruffled membrane alleles while the eastern population carried only the smooth alleles. Ocean currents in the area typically flowed from east to west, sometimes carrying cells (facilitating gene flow) from the eastern (smooth) population to the western (ruffled) population. Due to the ocean currents, it was almost impossible for any cells from the western population to be carried eastward. Thus, for inheritance purposes, the eastern (smooth) population remained isolated. In this case, the gene flow is unidirectional (going only in one direction) and unbalanced (only one population is receiving the new alleles).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Among humans, gene flow is often described as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1460\"><strong>admixture<\/strong>.<\/a> In forensic cases, anthropologists and geneticists are often asked to estimate the ancestry of unidentified human remains to help determine whether they match any missing persons\u2019 reports. This is one of the most complicated tasks in these professions because, while \u201crace\u201d or \u201cancestry\u201d involves simple checkboxes on a missing person\u2019s form, among humans today there are no truly distinct genetic populations. All modern humans are members of the same fully breeding compatible species, and all human communities have experienced multiple episodes of gene flow (admixture), leading all humans today to be so genetically similar that we are all members of the same (and only surviving) human subspecies: <em>Homo sapiens sapiens.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gene flow between otherwise isolated nonhuman populations is often termed <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1461\">hybridization.<\/a>.<\/strong> One example of this involves the hybridization and spread of <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1462\"><strong>Scutellata<\/strong><strong> honey bees<\/strong><\/a> (a.k.a. \u201ckiller bees\u201d) in the Americas. All honey bees worldwide are classified as <em>Apis mellifera.<\/em> Due to distinct adaptations to various environments around the world, there are 28 different subspecies of <em>Apis mellifera<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">During the 1950s, a Brazilian biologist named Warwick E. Kerr experimented with hybridizing African and European subspecies of honey bees to try to develop a strain that was better suited to tropical environments than the European honey bees that had long been kept by North American beekeepers. Dr. Kerr was careful to contain the reproductive queens and drones from the African subspecies, but in 1957, a visiting beekeeper accidentally released 26 queen bees of the Scutellata subspecies (<em>Apis mellifera scutellata<\/em>) from southern Africa into the Brazilian countryside. The Scutellata bees quickly interbred with local European honey bee populations. The hybridized bees exhibited a much more aggressively defensive behaviour, fatally or near-fatally attacking many humans and livestock that ventured too close to their hives. The hybridized bees spread throughout South America and reached Mexico and California by 1985. By 1990, permanent colonies had been established in Texas, and by 1997, 90% of trapped bee swarms around Tucson, Arizona, were found to be Scutellata hybrids (Sanford 2006).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another example involves the introduction of the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1463\"><strong>Harlequin ladybeetle<\/strong><\/a>, <em>Harmonia axyridis<\/em>, native to East Asia, to other parts of the world as a \u201cnatural\u201d form of pest control. Harlequin ladybeetles are natural predators of some of the aphids and other crop-pest insects. First introduced to North America in 1916, the \u201cbiocontrol\u201d strains of Harlequin ladybeetles were considered to be quite successful in reducing crop pests and saving farmers substantial amounts of money. After many decades of successful use in North America, biocontrol strains of Harlequin ladybeetles were also developed in Europe and South America in the 1980s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Over the seven decades of biocontrol use, the Harlequin ladybeetle had never shown any potential for development of wild colonies outside of its native habitat in China and Japan. New generations of beetles always had to be reared in the lab. That all changed in 1988, when a wild colony took root near New Orleans, Louisiana. Either through admixture with a native ladybeetle strain, or due to a spontaneous mutation, a new allele was clearly introduced into this population that suddenly enabled them to survive and reproduce in a wide range of environments. This population spread rapidly across the Americas and had reached Africa by 2004.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In Europe, the invasive, North American strain of Harlequin ladybeetle admixed with the European strain (Figure 5.14), causing a population explosion (Lombaert Et al. 2010). Even strains specifically developed to be flightless (to curtail the spreading) produced flighted offspring after admixture with members of the North American population (Facon Et al. 2011). The fast-spreading, invasive strain has quickly become a disaster, out-competing native ladybeetle populations (some to the point of extinction), causing home infestations, decimating fruit crops, and contaminating many batches of wine with their bitter flavor after being inadvertently harvested with the grapes (Pickering Et al. 2004).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 583px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-2.png\" alt=\"One gray ladybug is migrating to the group of white ladybugs.\" width=\"583\" height=\"219\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.14: Gene flow between two populations of ladybeetles (ladybugs). Credit: <a class=\"rId80\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Ladybug Gene Flow (Figure 4.14)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId81\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId82\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Natural Selection<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The final force of evolution is natural selection. This is the evolutionary process that Charles Darwin first brought to light, and it is what the general public typically evokes when considering the process of evolution. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1465\"><strong>Natural <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>election<\/strong><\/a> occurs when certain phenotypes confer an advantage or disadvantage in survival and\/or reproductive success. The alleles associated with those phenotypes will change in frequency over time due to this selective pressure. It\u2019s also important to note that the advantageous allele may change over time (with environmental changes) and that an allele that had previously been benign may become advantageous or detrimental. Of course, dominant, recessive, and codominant traits will be selected upon a bit differently from one another. Because natural selection acts on phenotypes rather than the alleles themselves, deleterious (disadvantageous) alleles can be retained by heterozygotes without any negative effects.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the case of our primordial ocean cells, up until now, the texture of their cell membranes has been benign. The frequencies of smooth to ruffled alleles, and smooth to ruffled phenotypes, has changed over time, due to genetic drift and gene flow. Let\u2019s now imagine that the Earth\u2019s climate has cooled to a point that the waters frequently become too cold for survival of the tiny bacteria that are the dietary staples of our smooth and ruffled cell populations. The way amoeba-like cells \u201ceat\u201d is to stretch out the cell membrane, almost like an arm, to encapsulate, then ingest, the tiny bacteria. When the temperatures plummet, the tiny bacteria populations plummet with them. Larger bacteria, however, are better able to withstand the temperature change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The smooth cells were well-adapted to ingesting tiny bacteria but poorly suited to encapsulating the larger bacteria. The cells with the ruffled membranes, however, are easily able to extend their ruffles to encapsulate the larger bacteria. They also find themselves able to stretch their entire membrane to a much larger size than their smooth-surfaced neighbors, allowing them to ingest more bacteria at a given time and to go for longer periods between feedings (Figure 5.15).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 528px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14-2.png\" alt=\"Smooth and ruffled cells feeding on large and small bacteria.\" width=\"528\" height=\"307\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.15: Smooth and ruffled cells feeding. Credit: Smooth and ruffled cells feeding original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Andrea J. Alveshere is a collective work under a <a class=\"rId84\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a class=\"rId85\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Cladograma_dos_Dom%C3%ADnios_e_Reinos.png\">Cladograma dos Dominios e Reinos<\/a> by <a class=\"rId86\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:MarceloTeles\">MarceloTeles<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId87\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a><a class=\"rId88\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">; <\/a><a class=\"rId89\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Amoeba_proteus_TK-UT.svg\">Amoeba Proteus TK-UT<\/a> by <a class=\"rId90\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> and <a class=\"rId91\" href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> (modified), <a class=\"rId92\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The smooth and ruffled traits, which had previously offered no advantage or disadvantage while food was plentiful, now are subject to natural selection. During the cold snaps, at least, the ruffled cells have a definite advantage. We can imagine that the western population that has mostly ruffled alleles will continue to do well, while the eastern population is at risk of dying out if the smaller bacteria remain scarce and no ruffled alleles are introduced.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A classic example of natural selection involves the study of an insect called the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1466\">peppered moth<\/a><\/strong> (<em>Biston betularia<\/em>) in England during the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the peppered moth population was predominantly light in colour, with dark (pepper-like) speckles on the wings. The \u201cpeppered\u201d colouration was very similar to the appearance of the bark and lichens that grew on the local trees (Figure 5.16). This helped to camouflage the moths as they rested on a tree, making it harder for moth-eating birds to find and snack on them. There was another phenotype that popped up occasionally in the population. These individuals were heterozygotes that carried an overactive, dominant pigment allele, producing a solid black colouration. As you can imagine, the black moths were much easier for birds to spot, making this phenotype a real disadvantage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The situation changed, however, as the Industrial Revolution took off. Large factories began spewing vast amounts of coal smoke into the air, blanketing the countryside, including the lichens and trees, in black soot. Suddenly, it was the light-coloured moths that were easy for birds to spot and the black moths that held the advantage. The frequency of the dark pigment allele rose dramatically. By 1895, the black moth phenotype accounted for 98% of observed moths (Grant 1999).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 476px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-2.png\" alt=\"An illustration of natural selection.\" width=\"476\" height=\"531\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.16: Dark and light peppered moth variants and their relative camouflage abilities on clean (top) and sooty (bottom) trees. Credit: <a class=\"rId94\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Peppered_moths_c2.jpg\">Peppered moths c2<\/a> by Khaydock is under a <a class=\"rId95\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Thanks to new environmental regulations in the 1960s, the air pollution in England began to taper off. As the soot levels decreased, returning the trees to their former, lighter colour, this provided the perfect opportunity to study how the peppered moth population would respond. Repeated follow-up studies documented the gradual rise in the frequency of the lighter-coloured phenotype. By 2003, the maximum frequency of the dark phenotype was 50% and in most parts of England had decreased to less than 10% (Cook, 2003).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Directional, Balancing\/Stabilizing, and Disruptive\/Diversifying Selection<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Natural selection can be classified as directional, balancing\/stabilizing, or disruptive\/diversifying, depending on how the pressure is applied to the population (Figure 5.17).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 465px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-2.png\" alt=\"Three types of selection; balancing, directional and disruptive\/diversifying\" width=\"465\" height=\"574\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.17: Lines depict the affects of (a) Balancing\/Stabilizing, (b) Directional, and (c) Disruptive\/Diversifying selection on populations. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a class=\"rId97\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Figure_19_03_01.png\">Biology (ID: 185cbf87-c72e-48f5-b51e-f14f21b5eabd@9.17)<\/a> by <a class=\"rId98\" href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/\">CNX OpenStax<\/a> is used under a <a class=\"rId99\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Both of the above examples of natural selection involve <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1467\">directional selection<\/a><\/strong>: the environmental pressures favor one phenotype over the other and cause the frequencies of the associated advantageous alleles (ruffled membranes, dark pigment) to gradually increase. In the case of the peppered moths, the direction shifted three times: first, it was selecting for lighter pigment; then, with the increase in pollution, the pressure switched to selection for darker pigment; finally, with reduction of the pollution, the selection pressure shifted back again to favoring light-coloured moths.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1468\"><strong>Balancing selection<\/strong><\/a> (a.k.a. stabilizing selection) occurs when selection works against the extremes of a trait and favors the intermediate phenotype. For example, humans maintain an average birth weight that balances the need for babies to be small enough not to cause complications during pregnancy and childbirth but big enough to maintain a safe body temperature after they are born. Another example of balancing selection is found in the genetic disorder called sickle cell anemia (see \u201cSpecial Topic: Sickle Cell Anemia\u201d).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1469\"><strong>Disruptive selection<\/strong><\/a> (a.k.a. diversifying selection), the opposite of balancing selection, occurs when both extremes of a trait are advantageous. Since individuals with traits in the mid-range are selected against, disruptive selection can eventually lead to the population evolving into two separate species. Darwin believed that the many species of finches (small birds) found in the remote Galapagos Islands provided a clear example of disruptive selection leading to speciation. He observed that seed-eating finches either had large beaks, capable of eating very large seeds, or small beaks, capable of retrieving tiny seeds. The islands did not have many plants that produced medium-size seeds. Thus, birds with medium-size beaks would have trouble eating the very large seeds and would also have been inefficient at picking up the tiny seeds. Over time, Darwin surmised, this pressure against mid-size beaks may have led the population to divide into two separate species.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Sexual Selection<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1470\"><strong>Sexual <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>election<\/strong><\/a> is an aspect of natural selection in which the selective pressure specifically affects reproductive success (the ability to successfully breed and raise offspring) rather than survival. Sexual selection favors traits that will attract a mate. Sometimes these sexually appealing traits even carry greater risks in terms of survival.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 354px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-2.png\" alt=\"A fox chases a peacock fleeing; a peacock displays his feathers to a peahen.\" width=\"354\" height=\"413\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.18: Showy peacock tail disadvantages (becoming easier prey) and advantages (impressing peahens). Credit: <a class=\"rId101\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Peacock tail advantage and disadvantages (Figure 4.18)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId102\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId103\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.License.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A classic example of sexual selection involves the brightly coloured feathers of the peacock. The <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1471\"><strong>peacock<\/strong><\/a> is the male sex of the peafowl genera <em>Pavo<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0<em>Afropavo. <\/em>During mating season, peacocks will fan their colourful tails wide and strut in front of the peahens in a grand display. The peahens will carefully observe these displays and will elect to mate with the male that they find the most appealing. Many studies have found that peahens prefer the males with the fullest, most colourful tails. While these large, showy tails provide a reproductive advantage, they can be a real burden in terms of escaping predators. The bright colours and patterns as well as the large size of the peacock tail make it difficult to hide. Once predators spot them, peacocks also struggle to fly away, with the heavy tail trailing behind and weighing them down (Figure 5.18). Some researchers have argued that the increased risk is part of the appeal for the peahens: only an especially strong, alert, and healthy peacock would be able to avoid predators while sporting such a spectacular tail.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>It\u2019s important to keep in mind that sexual selection relies on the trait being present throughout mating years. Reflecting on the NF1 genetic disorder (see \u201cSpecial Topic: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 [NF1]\u201d), given how disfiguring the symptoms can become, some might find it surprising that half of the babies born with NF1 inherited it from a parent. Given that the disorder is autosomal dominant and fully penetrant (meaning it has no unaffected carriers), it may seem surprising that sexual selection doesn\u2019t exert more pressure against the mutated alleles. One important factor is that, while the neurofibromas typically begin to appear during puberty, they usually emerge only a few at a time and may grow very slowly. Many NF1 patients don\u2019t experience the more severe or disfiguring symptoms until later in life, long after they have started families of their own.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some researchers prefer to classify sexual selection separately, as a fifth force of evolution. The traits that underpin mate selection are entirely natural, of course. Research has shown that subtle traits, such as the type of pheromones (hormonal odors related to immune system alleles) someone emits and how those are perceived by the immune system genotype of the \u201csniffer,\u201d may play crucial and subconscious roles in whether we find someone attractive or not (Chaix, Cao, &amp; Donnelly 2008).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1476\">Neurofibromatosis Type 1<\/a><\/strong>, also known as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1477\"><strong>NF1<\/strong><\/a>, is a genetic disorder that illustrates how a mutation in a single gene can affect multiple systems in the body. Surprisingly common, more people have NF1 than cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy combined. Even more surprising, given how common it is, is how few people have heard of it. One in every 3,000 babies is born with NF1, and this holds true for all populations worldwide (Riccardi 1992). This means that, for every 3,000 people in your community, there is likely at least one person living with this disorder. NF1 is an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1478\">autosomal dominant<\/a> <\/strong>condition, which means that everyone born with a mutation in the gene, whether inherited or spontaneous, has a 50\/50 chance of passing it on to each of their own children.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The NF1 disorder results from mutation of the <em>NF1<\/em> gene on Chromosome 17. Almost any mutation that affects the sequence of the gene\u2019s protein product, neurofibromin, will cause the disorder. Studies of individuals with NF1 have identified over 3,000 different mutations of all kinds (including point mutations, small and large indels, and translocations). The <em>NF1 <\/em>gene is one of the largest known genes, containing at least 60 <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_724\">exons<\/a><\/strong> (protein-encoding sequences) in a span of about 300,000 nucleotides.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">We know that neurofibromin plays an important role in preventing tumor growth because one of the most common symptoms of the NF1 disorder is the growth of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1479\">benign<\/a> <\/strong>(noncancerous) tumors, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1486\">neurofibromas<\/a><\/strong>. Neurofibromas sprout from nerve sheaths\u2014the tissues that encase our nerves\u2014throughout the body, usually beginning around puberty. There is no way to predict where the tumors will occur, or when or how quickly they will grow, although only about 15% turn <strong>malignant<\/strong> (cancerous). The two types of neurofibromas that are typically most visible are <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1480\"><strong>cutaneous neurofibromas<\/strong><\/a>, which are spherical bumps on, or just under, the surface of the skin (Figure 5.19), and <strong>plexiform neurofibromas<\/strong><em>, <\/em>growths involving whole branches of nerves, often giving the appearance that the surface of the skin is \u201cmelting\u201d (Figure 5.20).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_131\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-131\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-129\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/4.18.jpg\" alt=\"A woman has dozens of round, skin-colored tumors visible on her face, neck, and hand.\" width=\"510\" height=\"340\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-131\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.19: A woman with many cutaneous neurofibromas, a common symptom of Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Credit: <a class=\"rId105\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Woman with cutaneous neurofibromas (symptom of NF1)<\/a> by <a class=\"rId106\" href=\"https:\/\/positiveexposure.org\/about-the-program-2\/rick-guidotti\/\">Rick Guidotti of Positive Exposure<\/a> is used with permission and is available here under a <a class=\"rId107\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_131-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-131-2\" style=\"width: 1900px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-130 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/4.19.jpg\" alt=\"An adult with large plexiform neurofibromas covering his face, none are on the child.\" width=\"1900\" height=\"700\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-131-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.20: Photo on the left is of a man with large plexiform neurofibroma, another symptom of Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Photo on the right is a childhood photo of the same man, illustrating the progressive nature of the NF1 disorder. Credit: <a class=\"rId110\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Man with plexiform neurofibroma (symptom of NF1)<\/a> from Ashok Shrestha is used by permission and available here under a <a class=\"rId111\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. <a class=\"rId112\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Childhood photo of the same man with NF1 disorder<\/a> from Ashok Shrestha is used by permission and available here under a <a class=\"rId113\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unfortunately, there is currently no cure for NF1. Surgical removal of neurofibromas risks paralysis, due to the high potential for nerve damage, and often results in the tumors growing back even more vigorously. This means that patients are often forced to live with disfiguring and often painful neurofibromas. People who are not familiar with NF1 often mistake neurofibromas for something contagious. This makes it especially hard for people living with NF1 to get jobs working with the public or even to enjoy spending time away from home. Raising public awareness about NF1 and its symptoms can be a great help in improving the quality of life for people living with this condition.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 311px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21-2.png\" alt=\"A child with darker oval birthmarks scattered across his torso and arms.\" width=\"311\" height=\"415\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.21: Image of a child with caf\u00e9-au-lait macules (birthmarks) typical of the earliest symptoms of NF1. Credit: <a class=\"rId115\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Child with caf\u00e9-au-lait macules (birthmarks) typical of the earliest symptoms of NF1<\/a> by Andrea J. Alveshere is under a <a class=\"rId116\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the first symptoms of NF1 in a small child is usually the appearance of <strong>caf\u00e9-au-lait spots<\/strong>, or <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1490\"><strong>CALS<\/strong><\/a>, which are flat, brown birthmark-like spots on the skin (Figure 5.21). CALS are often light brown, similar to the colour of coffee with cream, which is the reason for the name, although the shade of the pigment depends on a person\u2019s overall complexion. Some babies are born with CALS, but for others the spots appear within the first few years of life. Having six or more CALS larger than five millimetres (mm) across is a strong indicator that a child may have NF1.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other common symptoms include the following: gliomas (tumors) of the optic nerve, which can cause vision loss; thinning of bones and failure to heal if they break (often requiring amputation); low muscle tone (poor muscle development, often delaying milestones such as sitting up, crawling, and walking); hearing loss, due to neurofibromas on auditory nerves; and learning disabilities, especially those involving spatial reasoning. Approximately 50% of people with NF1 have some type of speech and\/or learning disability and often benefit greatly from early intervention services. Generalized developmental disability, however, is not common with NF1, so most people with NF1 live independently as adults. Many people with NF1 live full and successful lives, as long as their symptoms can be managed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Based on the wide variety of symptoms, it\u2019s clear that the neurofibromin protein plays important roles in many biochemical pathways. While everyone who has NF1 will exhibit some symptoms during their lifetime, there is a great deal of variation in the types and severity of symptoms, even between individuals from the same family who share the exact same NF1 mutation. It seems crazy that a gene with so many important functions would be so susceptible to mutation. Part of this undoubtedly has to do with its massive size\u2014a gene with 300,000 nucleotides has ten times more nucleotides available for mutation than does a gene of 30,000 bases. This also suggests that the mutability of this gene might provide some benefits, which is a possibility that we will revisit later in this chapter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Sickle Cell Anemia<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1492\">Sickle cell anemia<\/a><\/strong> is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. It is most common in Africa, countries around the Mediterranean Sea, and eastward as far as India. Populations in the Americas that have high percentages of ancestors from these regions also have high rates of sickle cell anemia. In the United States, it\u2019s estimated that 72,000 people live with the disease, with one in approximately 1,200 Hispanic-American babies and one in every 500 African-American babies inheriting the condition (World Health Organization 1996).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 344px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22-2.png\" alt=\"Round and sickle cells.\" width=\"344\" height=\"258\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.22: Sickle cell anemia. Arrows indicate (a) sickled and (b) normal red blood cells. Credit: <a class=\"rId118\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Sickle-cell_smear_2015-09-10.jpg\">Sickle-cell smear 2015-09-10<\/a> by Paulo Henrique Orlandi Mourao has been modified (contrast modified and labels added) and is under a <a class=\"rId119\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sickle cell anemia affects the hemoglobin protein in red blood cells. Normal red blood cells are somewhat doughnut-shaped\u2014round with a depression on both sides of the middle. They carry oxygen around the bloodstream to cells throughout the body. Red blood cells produced by the mutated form of the gene take on a stiff, sickle-like crescent shape when stressed by low oxygen or dehydration (Figure 5.22). Because of their elongated shape and the fact that they are stiff rather than flexible, they tend to form clumps in the blood vessels, inhibiting blood flow to adjacent areas of the body. This causes episodes of extreme pain and can cause serious problems in the oxygen-deprived tissues. The sickle cells also break down much more quickly than normal cells, often lasting only 20 days rather than the 120 days of normal cells. This causes an overall shortage of blood cells in the sickle cell patient, resulting in low iron (anemia) and problems associated with it such as extreme fatigue, shortness of breath, and hindrances to children\u2019s growth and development.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The devastating effects of sickle cell anemia made its high frequency a pressing mystery. Why would an allele that is so deleterious in its homozygous form be maintained in a population at levels as high as the one in twelve African Americans estimated to carry at least one copy of the allele? The answer turned out to be one of the most interesting cases of balancing selection in the history of genetic study.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While looking for an explanation, scientists noticed that the countries with high rates of sickle cell disease also shared a high risk for another disease called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1493\"><strong>malaria<\/strong><\/a>, which is caused by infection of the blood by a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1494\"><strong><em>Plasmodium<\/em><\/strong><\/a> parasite. These parasites are carried by mosquitoes and enter the human bloodstream via a mosquito bite. Once infected, the person will experience flu-like symptoms that, if untreated, can often lead to death. Researchers discovered that many people living in these regions seemed to have a natural resistance to malaria. Further study revealed that people who carry the sickle cell allele are far less likely to experience a severe case of malaria. This would not be enough of a benefit to make the allele advantageous for the sickle cell homozygotes, who face shortened life spans due to sickle cell anemia. The real benefit of the sickle cell allele goes to the heterozygotes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">People who are heterozygous for sickle cell carry one normal allele, which produces the normal, round, red blood cells, and one sickle cell allele, which produces the sickle-shaped red blood cells. Thus, they have both the sickle and round blood cell types in their bloodstream. They produce enough of the round red blood cells to avoid the symptoms of sickle cell anemia, but they have enough sickle cells to provide protection from malaria.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When the <em>Plasmodium <\/em>parasites infect an individual, they begin to multiply in the liver, but then must infect the red blood cells to complete their reproductive cycle. When the parasites enter sickle-type cells, the cells respond by taking on the sickle shape. This prevents the parasite from circulating through the bloodstream and completing its life cycle, greatly inhibiting the severity of the infection in the sickle cell heterozygotes compared to non\u2013-sickle cell homozygotes. See Chapter 14 for more discussion of sickle cell anemia.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: The Real Primordial Cells\u2014<em>Dictyostelium Discoideum<\/em><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The amoeba-like primordial cells that were used as recurring examples throughout this chapter are inspired by actual research that is truly fascinating. In 2015, Gareth Bloomfield and colleagues reported on their genomic study of the social amoeba <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1496\"><strong><em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em><\/strong> <\/a>(a.k.a. \u201cslime molds,\u201d although technically they are amoebae, not molds). Strains of these amoebae have been grown in research laboratories for many decades and are useful in studying the mechanisms that amoeboid single-celled organisms use to ingest food and liquid. For simplification of our examples in this chapter, our amoeba-like cells remained ocean dwellers. Wild <em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em>, however, live in soil and feed on soil bacteria by growing ruffles in their membranes that reach out to encapsulate the bacterial cell. Laboratory strains, however, are typically raised on liquid media (agar) in Petri dishes, which is not suitable for the wild-type amoebae. It was widely known that the laboratory strains must have developed mutations in one or more genes to allow them to ingest the larger nutrient particles in the agar and larger volumes of liquid, but the genes involved were not known.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bloomfield and colleagues performed genomic testing on both the wild and the laboratory strains of <em>Dictyostelium discoideum. <\/em>Their discovery was astounding: every one of the laboratory strains carried a mutation in the <em>NF1 <\/em>gene, the very same gene associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) in humans. The antiquity of this massive, easily mutated gene is incredible. It originated in an ancestor common to both humans and these amoebae, and it has been retained in both lineages ever since. As seen in <em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em>, breaking the gene can be advantageous. Without a functioning copy of the neurofibromin protein, the cell membrane is able to form much-larger feeding structures, allowing the <em>NF1 <\/em>mutants to ingest larger particles and larger volumes of liquid. For these amoebae, this may provide dietary flexibility that functions somewhat like an insurance policy for times when the food supply is limited.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Dictyostelium discoideum <\/em>are also interesting in that they typically reproduce asexually, but under certain conditions, one cell will convert into a \u201cgiant\u201d cell, which encapsulates surrounding cells, transforming into one of three sexes. This cell will undergo meiosis, producing gametes that must combine with one of the other two sexes to produce viable offspring. This ability for sexual reproduction may be what allows <em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em> to benefit from the advantages of <em>NF1<\/em> mutation, while also being able to restore the wild type <em>NF1<\/em> gene in future generations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What does this mean for humans living with NF1? Well, understanding the role of the neurofibromin protein in the membranes of simple organisms like <em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em> may help us to better understand how it functions and malfunctions in the sheaths of human neurons. It\u2019s also possible that the mutability of the NF1 gene confers certain advantages to humans as well. Alleles of the NF1 gene have been found to reduce one\u2019s risk for alcoholism (Repunte-Canonigo Vez Et al. 2015), opiate addiction (Sanna Et al. 2002), Type 2 diabetes (Martins Et al. 2016), and hypomusicality (a lower-than-average musical aptitude; Cota Et al. 2018). This research is ongoing and will be exciting to follow in the coming years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Studying Evolution in Action<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">This chapter has introduced you to the forces of evolution, the mechanisms by which evolution occurs. How do we detect and study evolution, though, in real time, as it happens? One tool we use is the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1497\"><strong>Hardy-<\/strong><strong>Weinberg<\/strong><strong> Equilibrium<\/strong><\/a>: a mathematical formula that allows estimation of the number and distribution of dominant and recessive alleles in a population. This aids in determining whether allele frequencies are changing and, if so, how quickly over time, and in favour of which allele? It\u2019s important to note that the Hardy-Weinberg formula only gives us an estimate based on the data for a snapshot in time. We will have to calculate it again later, after various intervals, to determine if our population is evolving and in what way the allele frequencies are changing.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Calculating the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the Hardy-Weinberg formula, <em>p <\/em>represents the frequency of the dominant allele, and <em>q<\/em> represents the frequency of the recessive allele. Remember, an allele\u2019s frequency is the proportion, or percentage, of that allele in the population. For the purposes of Hardy-Weinberg, we give the allele percentages as decimal numbers (e.g., 42% = 0.42), with the entire population (100% of alleles) equaling 1. If we can figure out the frequency of one of the alleles in the population, then it is simple to calculate the other. Simply subtract the known frequency from 1 (the entire population): 1<em> \u2013 p = q<\/em> and 1<em> \u2013 q = p<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Hardy-Weinberg formula is <em>p<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup><em> + 2pq + q<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup>, where:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"padding-left: 40px\"><em>p<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup> represents the frequency of the homozygous dominant genotype;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"padding-left: 40px\"><em>2pq<\/em> represents the frequency of the heterozygous genotype; and<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"padding-left: 40px\"><em>q<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup> represents the frequency of the homozygous recessive genotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is often easiest to determine <em>q<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup> first, simply by counting the number of individuals with the unique, homozygous recessive phenotype (then dividing by the total individuals in the population to arrive at the \u201cfrequency\u201d). Once we have this number, we simply need to calculate the square root of the homozygous recessive phenotype frequency. That gives us <em>q.<\/em> Remember, 1 <em>\u2013<\/em> <em>q <\/em>equals <em>p<\/em>, so now we have the frequencies for both alleles in the population. If we needed to figure out the frequencies of heterozygotes and homozygous dominant genotypes, we\u2019d just need to plug the <em>p<\/em> and <em>q<\/em> frequencies back into the <em>p<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup> and 2<em>pq<\/em> formulas.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 329px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25-1.png\" alt=\"A circle with seven grey and three white ladybugs.\" width=\"329\" height=\"347\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.23: Ladybug population with a mixture of dark (red) and light (orange) individuals. Credit: <a class=\"rId129\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Ladybug mix (Figure 4.21)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId130\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId131\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Let\u2019s imagine we have a population of ladybeetles that carries two alleles: a dominant allele that produces red ladybeetles and a recessive allele that produces orange ladybeetles. Since red is dominant, we\u2019ll use <em>R <\/em>to represent the red allele, and <em>r <\/em>to represent the orange allele. Our population has ten beetles, and seven are red and three are orange (Figure 5.23). Let\u2019s calculate the number of genotypes and alleles in this population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Of ten total beetles, we have three orange beetles3\/10 = .30 (30%) frequency\u2014and we know they are homozygous recessive (<em>rr<\/em>). So:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\"><em>rr = .3; <\/em>therefore, <em>r = <\/em>\u221a.3 = .5477<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\"><em>R<\/em> = 1 <em>\u2013<\/em> .5477 = .4523<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\">Using the Hardy-Weinberg formula:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\">1=.4523<sup>2 <\/sup>+ 2 x .4523 x .5477 +.5477<sup>2 <\/sup>= .20 + .50 + .30 = 1<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\">Thus, the genotype breakdown is 20% <em>RR, <\/em>50%<em> Rr, <\/em>and 30%<em> rr <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 36pt\">(2 red homozygotes, 5 red heterozygotes, and 3 orange homozygotes).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Since we have 10 individuals, we know we have 20 total alleles: 4 red from the <em>RR<\/em> group, 5 red and 5 orange from the <em>Rr<\/em> group, and 6 orange from the <em>rr<\/em> group, for a grand total of 9 red and 11 orange (45% red and 55% orange, just like we estimated in the 1 \u2013 <em>q <\/em>step).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reminder: The Hardy-Weinberg formula only gives us an estimate for a snapshot in time. We will have to calculate it again later, after various intervals, to determine if our population is evolving and in what way the allele frequencies are changing.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interpreting Evolutionary Change: Nonra<\/strong><strong>ndom Mating <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Once we have detected change occurring in a population, we need to consider which evolutionary processes might be the cause of the change. It is important to watch for nonrandom mating patterns, to see if they can be included or excluded as possible sources of variation in allele frequencies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1498\"><strong>Nonrandom <\/strong><strong>m<\/strong><strong>ating<\/strong><\/a> (also known as assortative mating) occurs when mate choice within a population follows a nonrandom pattern.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1499\"><strong>Positive assortative mating<\/strong><\/a> patterns result from a tendency for individuals to mate with others who share similar phenotypes. This often happens based on body size. Taking as an example dog breeds, it is easier for two Chihuahuas to mate and have healthy offspring than it is for a Chihuahua and a St. Bernard to do so. This is especially true if the Chihuahua is the female and would have to give birth to giant St. Bernard pups.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1500\"><strong>Negative assortative mating<\/strong><\/a> patterns occur when individuals tend to select mates with qualities different from their own. This is what is at work when humans choose partners whose pheromones indicate that they have different and complementary immune alleles, providing potential offspring with a better chance at a stronger immune system.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Among domestic animals, such as pets and livestock, assortative mating is often directed by humans who decide which pairs will mate to increase the chances of offspring having certain desirable traits. This is known as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1501\"><strong>a<\/strong><strong>rtificial <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>election<\/strong><em>.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Among humans, in addition to phenotypic traits, cultural traits such as religion and ethnicity may also influence assortative mating patterns.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Defining a Species<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Species<\/em> are organisms whose individuals are capable of breeding because they are biologically and behaviourally compatible to produce viable, fertile offspring. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1502\"><strong>Viable offspring<\/strong><\/a> are those offspring that are healthy enough to survive to adulthood. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1503\"><strong>Fertile offspring<\/strong><\/a> are able to reproduce successfully, resulting in offspring of their own. Both conditions must be met for individuals to be considered part of the same species. As you can imagine, these criteria complicate the identification of distinct species in fossilized remains of extinct populations. In those cases, we must examine how much phenotypic variation is typically found within a comparable modern-day species; we can then determine whether the fossilized remains fall within the expected range of variation for a single species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some species have subpopulations that are regionally distinct. These are classified as separate <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1505\">subspecies<\/a><\/strong> because they have their own unique phenotypes and are geographically isolated from one another. However, if they do happen to encounter one another, they are still capable of successful interbreeding.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are many examples of sterile hybrids that are offspring of parents from two different species. For example, horses and donkeys can breed and have offspring together. Depending on which species is the mother and which is the father, the offspring are either called mules, or hennies. Mules and hennies can live full life spans but are not able to have offspring of their own. Likewise, tigers and lions have been known to mate and have viable offspring. Again, depending on which species is the mother and which is the father, these offspring are called either ligers or tigons. Like mules and hennies, ligers and tigons are unable to reproduce. In each of these cases, the mismatched set of chromosomes that the offspring inherit produce an adequate set of functioning genes for the hybrid offspring; however, once mixed and divided in meiosis, the gametes don\u2019t contain the full complement of genes needed for survival in the third generation.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Micro- to Macroevolution<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1506\"><strong>Microevolution<\/strong><\/a> refers to changes in allele frequencies within breeding populations\u2014that is, within single species. <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1507\"><strong>Macroevolution<\/strong><\/a> describes how the similarities and differences between species, as well as the phylogenetic relationships with other taxa, lead to changes that result in the emergence of new species. Consider our example of the peppered moth that illustrated microevolution over time, via directional selection favoring the peppered allele when the trees were clean and the dark pigment allele when the trees were sooty. Imagine that environmental regulations had cleaned up the air pollution in one part of the nation, while the coal-fired factories continued to spew soot in another area. If this went on long enough, it\u2019s possible that two distinct moth populations would eventually emerge\u2014one containing only the peppered allele and the other only harbouring the dark pigment allele.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When a single population divides into two or more separate species, it is called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1508\"><strong>speciation<\/strong><\/a>. The changes that prevent successful breeding between individuals who descended from the same ancestral population may involve chromosomal rearrangements, changes in the ability of the sperm from one species to permeate the egg membrane of the other species, or dramatic changes in hormonal schedules or mating behaviours that prevent members from the new species from being able to effectively pair up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are two types of speciation: allopatric and sympatric. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1509\">Allopatric speciation<\/a><\/strong> is caused by long-term <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1510\"><strong>isolation<\/strong><\/a> (physical separation) of subgroups of the population (Figure 5.24). Something occurs in the environment\u2014perhaps a river changes its course and splits the group, preventing them from breeding with members on the opposite riverbank. Over many generations, new mutations and adaptations to the different environments on each side of the river may drive the two subpopulations to change so much that they can no longer produce fertile, viable offspring, even if the barrier is someday removed.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-2.png\" alt=\"Process of isolation leading to speciation, as described in the figure caption.\" width=\"1000\" height=\"379\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.24: Isolation leading to speciation: a. original population before isolation; b. a barrier divides the population and prevents interbreeding between the two groups; c. time passes, and the populations become genetically distinct; d. after many generations, the two populations are no longer biologically or behaviourally compatible, thus can no longer interbreed, even if the barrier is removed. Credit: <a class=\"rId121\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Isolation Leading to Speciation (Figure 4.19)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId122\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId123\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sympatric speciation<\/strong> occurs when the population splits into two or more separate species while remaining located together <em>without<\/em> a physical barrier. This typically results from a new mutation that pops up among some members of the population that prevents them from successfully reproducing with anyone who does not carry the same mutation. This is seen particularly often in plants, as they have a higher frequency of chromosomal duplications.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the quickest rates of speciation is observed in the case of adaptive radiation. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1512\">Adaptive radiation<\/a><\/strong> refers to the situation in which subgroups of a single species rapidly diversify and adapt to fill a variety of ecological niches. An <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1513\"><strong>e<\/strong><strong>cological niche<\/strong><\/a> is a set of constraints and resources that is available in an environmental setting. Evidence for adaptive radiations is often seen after population bottlenecks. A mass disaster kills off many species, and the survivors have access to a new set of territories and resources that were either unavailable or much coveted and fought over before the disaster. The offspring of the surviving population will often split into multiple species, each of which stems from members in that first group of survivors who happened to carry alleles that were advantageous for a particular niche.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The classic example of adaptive radiation brings us back to Charles Darwin and his observations of the many species of finches on the Galapagos Islands. We are still not sure how the ancestral population of finches first arrived on that remote Pacific Island chain, but they found themselves in an environment filled with various insects, large and tiny seeds, fruit, and delicious varieties of cactus. Some members of that initial population carried alleles that gave them advantages for each of these dietary niches. In subsequent generations, others developed new mutations, some of which were beneficial. These traits were selected for, making the advantageous alleles more common among their offspring. As the finches spread from one island to the next, they would be far more likely to find mates among the birds on their new island. Birds feeding in the same area were then more likely to mate together than birds who have different diets, contributing to additional assortative mating. Together, these evolutionary mechanisms caused rapid speciation that allowed the new species to make the most of the various dietary niches (Figure 5.25).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 619px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24-1.png\" alt=\"A family tree of finches with different sized beaks.\" width=\"619\" height=\"325\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5.25: Darwin\u2019s finches demonstrating Adaptive Radiation. Credit: <a class=\"rId125\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Darwin\u2019s finches (Figure 4.20)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId126\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId127\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In today\u2019s modern world, understanding these evolutionary processes is crucial for developing immunizations and antibiotics that can keep up with the rapid mutation rate of viruses and bacteria. This is also relevant to our food supply, which relies, in large part, on the development of herbicides and pesticides that keep up with the mutation rates of pests and weeds. Viruses, bacteria, agricultural pests, and weeds have all shown great flexibility in developing alleles that make them resistant to the latest medical treatment, pesticide, or herbicide. Billion-dollar industries have specialized in trying to keep our species one step ahead of the next mutation in the pests and infectious diseases that put our survival at risk.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Summarize the Modern Synthesis and provide several examples of how it is relevant to questions and problems in our world today.<\/li>\n<li>You inherit a house from a long-lost relative that contains a fancy aquarium, filled with a variety of snails. The phenotypes include large snails and small snails; red, black, and yellow snails; and solid, striped, and spotted snails. Devise a series of experiments that would help you determine how many snail species are present in your aquarium.<\/li>\n<li>Match the correct force of evolution with the correct real-world example:<br \/>\na. Mutationi. 5-alpha reductase deficiency<br \/>\nb. Genetic Driftii. Peppered Moths<br \/>\nc. Gene Flowiii. Neurofibromatosis Type 1<br \/>\nd. Natural Selectioniv. Scutellata Honey Bees<\/li>\n<li>Imagine a population of common house mice (<em>Mus musculus<\/em>). Draw a comic strip illustrating how mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection might transform this population over several (or more) generations.<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The many breeds of the single species of domestic dog (<em>Canis<\/em> <em>familiaris<\/em>) provide an extreme example of microevolution. Discuss why this is the case. What future scenarios can you imagine that could potentially transform the domestic dog into an example of macroevolution?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The ability to roll one\u2019s tongue (lift the outer edges of the tongue to touch each other, forming a tube) is a dominant trait. In a small town of 1,500 people, 500 can roll their tongues. Use the Hardy-Weinberg formula to determine how many individuals in the town are homozygous dominant, heterozygous, and homozygous recessive.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>5-alpha reductase deficiency<\/strong>: An autosomal recessive syndrome that manifests when a child having both X and Y sex chromosomes inherits two nonfunctional (mutated) copies of the SRD5A2 gene, producing a deficiency in a hormone necessary for development in infancy of typical male genitalia. These children often appear at birth to have female genitalia, but they develop a penis and other sexual characteristics when other hormones kick in during puberty.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Adaptive radiation<\/strong>: The situation in which subgroups of a single species rapidly diversify and adapt to fill a variety of ecological niches.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Admixture<\/strong>: A term often used to describe gene flow between human populations. Sometimes also used to describe gene flow between nonhuman populations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Allele frequency<\/strong>: The ratio, or percentage, of one allele compared to the other alleles for that gene within the study population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Alleles<\/strong>: Variant forms of genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Allopatric speciation<\/strong>: Speciation caused by long-term isolation (physical separation) of subgroups of the population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Antibiotics<\/strong>: Medicines prescribed to treat bacterial infections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Artificial selection<\/strong>: Human-directed assortative mating among domestic animals, such as pets and livestock, designed to increase the chances of offspring having certain desirable traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Asexual reproduction<\/strong>: Reproduction via mitosis, whereby offspring are clones of the parents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Autosomal dominant<\/strong>: A phenotype produced by a gene on an autosomal chromosome that is expressed, to the exclusion of the recessive phenotype, in heterozygotes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Autosomal recessive<\/strong>: A phenotype produced by a gene on an autosomal chromosome that is expressed only in individuals homozygous for the recessive allele.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Balanced translocations<\/strong>: Chromosomal translocations in which the genes are swapped but no genetic information is lost.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Balancing selection<\/strong>: A pattern of natural selection that occurs when the extremes of a trait are selected against, favoring the intermediate phenotype (a.k.a. stabilizing selection).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Beneficial mutations<\/strong>: Mutations that produce some sort of an advantage to the individual.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Benign<\/strong>: Noncancerous. Benign tumors may cause problems due to the area in which they are located (e.g., they might put pressure on a nerve or brain area), but they will not release cells that aggressively spread to other areas of the body.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Caf\u00e9-au-lait spots (CALS)<\/strong>: Flat, brown birthmark-like spots on the skin, commonly associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosomal translocations<\/strong>: The transfer of DNA between nonhomologous chromosomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosomes<\/strong>: Molecules that carry collections of genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Codons<\/strong>: Three-nucleotide units of DNA that function as three-letter \u201cwords,\u201d encoding instructions for the addition of one amino acid to a protein or indicating that the protein is complete.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cretaceous\u2013Paleogene extinction<\/strong>: A mass disaster caused by an asteroid that struck the earth approximately 66 million years ago and killed 75% of life on Earth, including all terrestrial dinosaurs. (a.k.a. K-Pg Extinction, Cretatious-Tertiary Extinction, and K-T Extinction).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Crossover events<\/strong>: Chromosomal alterations that occur when DNA is swapped between homologous chromosomes while they are paired up during meiosis I.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cutaneous neurofibromas<\/strong>: Neurofibromas that manifest as spherical bumps on or just under the surface of the skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deleterious mutation<\/strong>: A mutation producing negative effects to the individual such as the beginnings of cancers or heritable disorders.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deletions<\/strong>: Mutations that involve the removal of one or more nucleotides from a DNA sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Derivative chromosomes<\/strong>: New chromosomal structures resulting from translocations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Dictyostelium discoideum<\/em><\/strong>: A species of social amoebae that has been widely used for laboratory research. Laboratory strains of <em>Dictyostelium discoideum <\/em>all carry mutations in the <em>NF1<\/em> gene, which is what allows them to survive on liquid media (agar) in Petri dishes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Directional selection<\/strong>: A pattern of natural selection in which one phenotype is favored over the other, causing the frequencies of the associated advantageous alleles to gradually increase.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Disruptive selection<\/strong>: A pattern of natural selection that occurs when both extremes of a trait are advantageous and intermediate phenotypes are selected against (a.k.a. diversifying selection).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA repair mechanisms<\/strong>: Enzymes that patrol and repair DNA in living cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA transposons<\/strong>: Transposons that are clipped out of the DNA sequence itself and inserted elsewhere in the genome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ecological niche<\/strong>: A set of constraints and resources that are available in an environmental setting.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ellis-van Creveld syndrome<\/strong>: An autosomal recessive disorder characterized by short stature (dwarfism), polydactyly (the development of more than five digits [fingers or toes] on the hands or feet), abnormal tooth development, and heart defects. Estimated to affect approximately one in 60,000 individuals worldwide, among the Old Order Amish of Lancaster County, the rate is estimated to be as high as one in every 200 births.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Evolution<\/strong>: A change in the allele frequencies in a population over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exons<\/strong>: The DNA sequences within a gene that directly encode protein sequences. After being transcribed into messenger RNA, the introns (DNA sequences within a gene that do not directly encode protein sequences) are clipped out, and the exons are pasted together prior to translation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fertile offspring<\/strong>: Offspring that can successfully reproduce, resulting in offspring of their own.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Founder effect<\/strong>: A type of genetic drift that occurs when members of a population leave the main or \u201cparent\u201d group and form a new population that no longer interbreeds with the other members of the original group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Frameshift mutations<\/strong>: Types of indels that involve the insertion or deletion of any number of nucleotides that is not a multiple of three. These \u201cshift the reading frame\u201d and cause all codons beyond the mutation to be misread.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gametes<\/strong>: The reproductive cells, produced through meiosis (a.k.a. germ cells or sperm or egg cells).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene<\/strong>: A sequence of DNA that provides coding information for the construction of proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene flow<\/strong>: The movement of alleles from one population to another. This is one of the forces of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene pool<\/strong>: The entire collection of genetic material in a breeding community that can be passed on from one generation to the next.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genetic drift<\/strong>: Random changes in allele frequencies within a population from one generation to the next. This is one of the forces of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotype<\/strong>: The set of alleles that an individual has for a given gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotype frequencies<\/strong>: The ratios or percentages of the different homozygous and heterozygous genotypes in the population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Guevedoces<\/em><\/strong>: The term coined locally in the Dominican Republic for the condition scientifically known as 5-alpha reductase deficiency. The literal translation is \u201cpenis at twelve.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium<\/strong>: A mathematical formula (<em>1=p<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup><em> + 2pq + q<\/em><sup><em>2<\/em><\/sup> ) that allows estimation of the number and distribution of dominant and recessive alleles in a population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Harlequin ladybeetle<\/strong>: A species of ladybeetle, native to East Asia, that was introduced to Europe and the Americas as a form of pest control. After many decades of use, one of the North American strains developed the ability to reproduce in diverse environments, causing it to spread rapidly throughout the Americas, Europe, and Africa. It has hybridized with European strains and is now a major pest in its own right.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterozygous genotype<\/strong>: A genotype comprising two different alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homozygous genotype<\/strong>: A genotype comprising an identical set of alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hybridization<\/strong>: A term often used to describe gene flow between nonhuman populations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Inbreeding<\/strong>: The selection of mates exclusively from within a small, closed population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Indels<\/strong>: A class of mutations that includes both insertions and deletions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Inherited mutation<\/strong>: A mutation that has been passed from parent to offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insertions<\/strong>: Mutations that involve the addition of one or more nucleotides into a DNA sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Isolation<\/strong>: Prevention of a population subgroup from breeding with other members of the same species due to a physical barrier or, in humans, a cultural rule.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA)<\/strong>: The ancient organism from which all living things on Earth are descended.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Macroevolution<\/strong>: Changes that result in the emergence of new species, how the similarities and differences between species, as well as the phylogenetic relationships with other taxa, lead to changes that result in the emergence of new species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Malaria<\/strong>: A frequently deadly mosquito-borne disease caused by infection of the blood by a <em>Plasmodium<\/em> parasite.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Malignant<\/strong>: Cancerous. Malignant tumors grow aggressively and their cells may metastasize (travel through the blood or lymph systems) to form new, aggressive tumors in other areas of the body.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microevolution<\/strong>: Changes in allele frequencies within breeding populations\u2014that is, within a single species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Modern Synthesis<\/strong>: The integration of Darwin\u2019s, Mendel\u2019s, and subsequent research into a unified theory of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monosomies<\/strong>: Conditions resulting from a nondisjunction event, in which a cell ends up with only one copy of a chromosome. In humans, a single X chromosome is the only survivable monosomy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutation<\/strong>: A change in the nucleotide sequence of the genetic code. This is one of the forces of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Natural selection<\/strong>: An evolutionary process that occurs when certain phenotypes confer an advantage or disadvantage in survival and\/or reproductive success. This is one of the forces of evolution, and it was first identified by Charles Darwin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Negative assortative mating<\/strong>: A pattern that occurs when individuals tend to select mates with qualities different from their own.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neurofibromas<\/strong>: Nerve sheath tumors that are common symptoms of Neurofibromatosis Type 1.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neurofibromatosis Type 1<\/strong>: An autosomal dominant genetic disorder affecting one in every 3,000 people. It is caused by mutation of the <em>NF1<\/em> gene on Chromosome 17, resulting in a defective neurofibromin protein. The disorder is characterized by neurofibromas, caf\u00e9-au-lait spots, and a host of other potential symptoms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>NF1<\/strong>: An abbreviation for Neurofibromatosis Type 1. When italicized, <em>NF1 <\/em>refers to the gene on Chromosome 17 that encodes the neurofibromin protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nondisjunction events<\/strong>: Chromosomal abnormalities that occur when the homologous chromosomes (in meiosis I) or sister chromatids (in meiosis II and mitosis) fail to separate after pairing. The result is that both chromosomes or chromatids end up in the same daughter cell, leaving the other daughter cell without any copy of that chromosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nonrandom mating<\/strong>: A scenario in which mate choice within a population follows a nonrandom pattern (a.k.a. assortative mating).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nonsynonymous mutation<\/strong>: A point mutation that causes a change in the resulting protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Old Order Amish<\/strong>: A culturally isolated population in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, that has approximately 50,000 current members, all of whom can trace their ancestry back to a group of approximately eighty individuals. This group has high rates of certain genetics disorders, including Ellis-van Creveld syndrome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Origins of life<\/strong>: How the first living organism came into being.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Peacock<\/strong>: The male sex of the peafowl, famous for its large, colourful tail, which it dramatically displays to attract mates. (The female of the species is known as a peahen.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Peppered moth<\/strong>: A species of moth (<em>Biston betularia<\/em>) found in England that has light and dark phenotypes. During the Industrial Revolution, when soot blackened the trees, the frequency of the previously rare dark phenotype dramatically increased, as lighter-coloured moths were easier for birds to spot against the sooty trees. After environmental regulations eliminated the soot, the lighter-coloured phenotype gradually became most common again.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phenotype<\/strong>: The observable traits that are produced by a genotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phylogenetic tree of life<\/strong>: A family tree of all living organisms, based on genetic relationships.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phylogenies<\/strong>: Genetically determined family lineages.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Plasmodium<\/em><\/strong>: A genus of mosquito-borne parasite. Several <em>Plasmodium<\/em> species cause malaria when introduced to the human bloodstream via a mosquito bite.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Plexiform neurofibromas<\/strong>: Neurofibromas that involve whole branches of nerves, often giving the appearance that the surface of the skin is \u201cmelting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Point mutation<\/strong>: A single-letter (single-nucleotide) change in the genetic code, resulting in the substitution of one nucleic acid base for a different one.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polymorphisms<\/strong>: Multiple forms of a trait; alternative phenotypes within a given species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Population<\/strong>: A group of individuals who are genetically similar enough and geographically near enough to one another that they can breed and produce new generations of individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Population bottleneck<\/strong>: A type of genetic drift that occurs when the number of individuals in a population drops dramatically due to some random event.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Positive assortative mating<\/strong>: A pattern that results from a tendency for individuals to mate with others who share similar phenotypes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retrotransposons<\/strong>: Transposons that are transcribed from DNA into RNA, and then are \u201creverse transcribed,\u201d to insert the copied sequence into a new location in the DNA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Scutellata honey bees<\/strong>: A strain of honey bees that resulted from the hybridization of African and European honey bee subspecies. These bees were accidentally released into the wild in 1957 in Brazil and have since spread throughout South and Central America and into the United States. Also known as \u201ckiller bees,\u201d they tend to be very aggressive in defense of their hives and have caused many fatal injuries to humans and livestock.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual reproduction<\/strong>: Reproduction via meiosis and combination of gametes. Offspring inherit genetic material from both parents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual selection<\/strong>: An aspect of natural selection in which the selective pressure specifically affects reproductive success (the ability to successfully breed and raise offspring).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sickle cell anemia<\/strong>: An autosomal recessive genetic disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. It is most common in Africa, countries around the Mediterranean Sea, and eastward as far as India. Homozygotes for the recessive allele develop the disorder, which produce misshapen red blood cells that cause iron deficiency, painful episodes of oxygen-deprivation in localized tissues, and a host of other symptoms. In heterozygotes, though, the sickle cell allele confers a greater resistance to malaria.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Somatic cells<\/strong>: The cells of our organs and other body tissues (all cells except gametes) that replicate by mitosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Speciation<\/strong>: The process by which a single population divides into two or more separate species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong>: Organisms whose individuals are capable of breeding because they are biologically and behaviourally compatible to produce viable, fertile offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Spontaneous mutation<\/strong>: A mutation that occurs due to random chance or unintentional exposure to mutagens. In families, a spontaneous mutation is the first case, as opposed to mutations that are inherited from parents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Subspecies<\/strong>: A distinct subtype of a species. Most often, this is a geographically isolated population with unique phenotypes; however, it remains biologically and behaviourally capable of interbreeding with other populations of the same species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sympatric speciation<\/strong>: When a population splits into two or more separate species while remaining located together without a physical (or cultural) barrier.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Synonymous mutation<\/strong>: A point mutation that does not change the resulting protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transposable elements<\/strong>: Fragments of DNA that can \u201cjump\u201d around in the genome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transposon<\/strong>: Another term for \u201ctransposable element.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trisomies<\/strong>: Conditions in which three copies of the same chromosome end up in a cell, resulting from a nondisjunction event. Down syndrome, Edwards syndrome, and Patau syndrome are trisomies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Unbalanced translocations<\/strong>: Chromosomal translocations in which there is an unequal exchange of genetic material, resulting in duplication or loss of genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>UV crosslinking<\/strong>: A type of mutation in which adjacent thymine bases bind to one another in the presence of UV light.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Viable offspring<\/strong>: Offspring that are healthy enough to survive to adulthood.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Xeroderma pigmentosum<\/strong>: An autosomal recessive disease in which DNA repair mechanisms do not function correctly, resulting in a host of problems especially related to sun exposure, including severe sunburns, dry skin, heavy freckling, and other pigment changes.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p>Explore Evolution on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hhmi.org\/biointeractive\/evolution-collection\">HHMI\u2019s Biointeractive website<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Teaching Evolution through <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/education\/teaching-evolution-through-human-examples\">Human Examples, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History websites<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bloomfield, Gareth, David Traynor, Sophia P. Sander, Douwe M. Veltman, Justin A. Pachebat, and Robert R. Kay. 2015. \u201cNeurofibromin Controls Macropinocytosis and Phagocytosis in <em>Dictyostelium<\/em>.\u201d <em>eLife<\/em> 4:e04940.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chaix, Rapha\u00eblle, Chen Cao, and Peter Donnelly. 2008. \u201cIs Mate Choice in Humans MHC-Dependent?\u201d\u00a0<em>PLoS Genetics<\/em>\u00a04 (9): e1000184.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cook, Laurence\u00a0M. 2003. \"The Rise and Fall of the\u00a0<em>Carbonaria<\/em>\u00a0Form of the Peppered Moth.\" <em>The Quarterly Review of Biology<\/em> 78 (4): 399\u2013417.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cota, Bruno C\u00e9zar Lage, Jo\u00e3o Gabriel Marques Fonseca, Luiz Oswaldo Carneiro Rodrigues, Nilton Alves de Rezende, Pollyanna Barros Batista, Vincent Michael Riccardi, and Luciana Macedo de Resende. 2018. \u201cAmusia and Its Electrophysiological Correlates in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.\u201d <em>Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria<\/em> 76 (5): 287\u2013295.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">D\u2019Asdia, Maria Cecilia, Isabella Torrente, Federica Consoli, Rosangela Ferese, Monia Magliozzi, Laura Bernardini, Valentina Guida, et al. 2013. \u201cNovel and Recurrent EVC and EVC2 Mutations in Ellis-van Creveld Syndrome and Weyers Acrofacial Dyostosis.\u201d <em>European Journal of Medical Genetics<\/em> 56 (2): 80\u201387.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1937. <em>Genetics and the Origin of Species. <\/em>Columbia University Biological Series. New York: Columbia University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Facon, Beno\u00eet, Laurent Crespin, Anne Loiseau, Eric Lombaert, Alexandra Magro, and Arnaud Estoup. 2011. \u201cCan Things Get Worse When an Invasive Species Hybridizes? The Harlequin Ladybird\u00a0<em>Harmonia axyridis<\/em>\u00a0in France as a Case Study.\u201d\u00a0<em>Evolutionary Applications<\/em> 4 (1): 71\u201388.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fisher, Ronald A. 1919. \"The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.\" <em>Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh<\/em> 52 (2): 399\u2013433.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ford, E. B. 1942.\u00a0<em>Genetics for Medical Students<\/em>. London: Methuen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff\">Ford, E. B.\u00a01949.\u00a0<em>Mendelism and Evolution<\/em>. London: Methuen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Grant, Bruce S. 1999. \u201cFine-tuning the Peppered Moth Paradigm.\u201d <em>Evolution<\/em> 53 (3): 980\u2013984.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Haldane, J. B. S.\u00a01924.\u00a0\u201cA Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection (Part 1).\u201d <em>Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society<\/em>\u00a023 (2):19\u201341.<\/p>\n<p>Hoelzel, A. R., Gkafas, G. A., Kang, H., Sarigol, F., Le Boeuf, B., Costa, D. P., Beltran, R. S., Reiter, J., Robinson, P. W., McInerney, N., Seim, I., Sun, S., Fan, G., &amp; Li, S. (2024). Genomics of post-bottleneck recovery in the northern elephant seal. Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution, 8, 686\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-024-02337-4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Imperato-McGinley, J., and Y.-S. Zhu. 2002. \u201cAndrogens and Male Physiology: The Syndrome of 5 Alpha-Reductase-2 Deficiency.\u201d\u00a0<em>Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology <\/em>198 (1-2): 51\u201359.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jablonski, David, and W. G. Chaloner. 1994. \"Extinctions in the Fossil Record.\u201d\u00a0<em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London\u00a0B: Biological Sciences<\/em>\u00a0344 (1307): 11\u201317.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Livi-Bacci, Massimo. 2006. \u201cThe Depopulation of Hispanic America after the Conquest.\u201d <em>Population Development and Review<\/em> 32 (2): 199\u2013232.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lombaert, Eric, Thomas Guillemaud, Jean-Marie Cornuet, Thibaut Malausa, Beno\u00eet Facon, and Arnaud Estoup. 2010. \"Bridgehead Effect in the Worldwide Invasion of the Biocontrol Harlequin Ladybird.\u201d <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 5 (3): e9743.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Martins, Aline Stangherlin, Ann Kristine Jansen, Luiz Oswaldo Carneiro Rodrigues, Camila Maria Matos, Marcio Leandro Ribeiro Souza, Juliana Ferreira de Souza, Maria de F\u00e1tima Haueisen Sander Diniz, et al. 2016. \u201cLower Fasting Blood Glucose in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.\u201d <em>Endocrine Connections<\/em> 5 (1): 28\u201333.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pickering, Gary, James Lin, Roland Riesen, Andrew Reynolds, Ian Brindle, and George Soleas. 2004.\u00a0\"Influence of\u00a0<em>Harmonia axyridis<\/em>\u00a0on the Sensory Properties of White and Red Wine.\"\u00a0<em>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture<\/em>\u00a055 (2): 153\u2013159.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Repunte-Canonigo Vez, Melissa A. Herman, Tomoya Kawamura, Henry R. Kranzler, Richard Sherva, Joel Gelernter, Lindsay A. Farrer, Marisa Roberto, and Pietro Paolo Sanna. 2015. \u201cNF1 Regulates Alcohol Dependence-Associated Excessive Drinking and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Release in the Central Amygdala in Mice and Is Associated with Alcohol Dependence in Humans.\u201d <em>Biological Psychiatry<\/em> 77 (10): 870\u2013879.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Riccardi, Vincent M. 1992. <em>Neurofibromatosis: Phenotype, Natural History, and Pathogenesis.<\/em> Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sanford, Malcolm T. 2006.\u00a0\"The Africanized Honey Bee in the Americas: A Biological Revolution with Human Cultural Implications, Part V\u2014Conclusion.\"\u00a0<em>American Bee Journal <\/em>146 (7): 597\u2013599.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sanna, Pietro Paolo, Cindy Simpson, Robert Lutjens, and George Koob. 2002. \u201cERK Regulation in Chronic Ethanol Exposure and Withdrawal.\u201d <em>Brain Research<\/em> 948 (1\u20132): 186\u2013191.<\/p>\n<p>Weber, DianaS., Stewart, B. S., Garza, J. Carlos., &amp; Lehman, N. (2000). An empirical genetic assessment of the severity of the northern elephant seal population bottleneck. Current Biology, 10(20), 1287\u20131290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0960-9822(00)00759-4<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">World Health Organization. 1996. \u201cControl of Hereditary Disorders: Report of WHO Scientific meeting (1996).\u201d WHO Technical Reports 865. Geneva: World Health Organization.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">World Health Organization. 2017. \u201cGlobal Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics.\u201d Global Priority Pathogens List, February 27. Geneva: World Health Organization. https:\/\/www.who.int\/medicines\/publications\/WHO-PPL-Short_Summary_25Feb-ET_NM_WHO.pdf.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wright, Sewall. 1932. \"The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding, and Selection in Evolution.\" <em>Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics<\/em> 1 (6): 356\u2013366.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Acknowledgement<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Many thanks to Dr. Vincent M. Riccardi for sharing his vast knowledge of neurofibromatosis and for encouraging me to explore it from an anthropological perspective.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1635\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1635\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h6><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">NOTE: This test page does not have a working glossary. If we decide on this updated info box, we need to migrate the info to the previous page.<\/span><\/h6>\n<h6>Student contributors for this chapter from Salinda Hess' ANTH 203: <em>Emma Costa, Shima Gahima, Will Lefebvre, Audrey Ch\u00e9kina\u00ebl.\u00a0<\/em><\/h6>\n<p>Learn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/about-the-authors\/\">authors and editors<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\"> Hess' student contributions<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/versioning-history\/\">versioning history<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain and identify the purpose of both DNA replication and the cell cycle.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify key differences between mitosis and meiosis.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Outline the process of protein synthesis, including transcription and translation.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Use principles of Mendelian inheritance to predict genotypes and phenotypes of future generations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain complexities surrounding patterns of genetic inheritance and polygenic traits.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss challenges to and bioethical concerns of genetic testing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Cells and Molecules<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Molecules of Life<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All organisms are composed of four basic types of molecules that are essential for cell structure and function: proteins<strong>, <\/strong>lipids<strong>, <\/strong>carbohydrates, and nucleic acids (Figure 4.1). <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_586\">Proteins<\/a> <\/strong>are crucial for cell shape and nearly all cellular tasks, including receiving signals from outside the cell and mobilizing intra-cellular responses. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_588\">Lipids<\/a> <\/strong>are a class of organic compounds that include fats, oils, and hormones.\u00a0<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_590\">Carbohydrates<\/a><\/strong> are sugar molecules and serve as energy to cells in the form of glucose. Lastly, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_592\">nucleic acids<\/a><\/strong>, including <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_594\">deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)<\/a><\/strong>, carry genetic information about a living organism.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 740px; height: 551px;\" border=\"1pt solid rgb(0, 0, 0)\" cellpadding=\"5pt\">\n<caption>Figure 4.1: Information about the four biomolecules. Credit: Biomolecules Table original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Hayley Mann is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 40px;\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 125.594px; height: 40px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecule<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 223.906px; height: 40px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><strong>Definition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 346.562px; height: 40px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\"><strong>Example<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 194px;\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 125.594px; height: 194px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 223.906px; height: 194px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Composed of one or more long chains of amino acids (i.e., basic units of protein)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Often folded into complex 3D shapes that relate to function<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins interact with other types of proteins and molecules<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 346.562px; height: 194px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins come in different categories including structural (e.g., collagen, keratin, lactase, hemoglobin, cell membrane proteins), defense proteins (e.g, antibodies), enzymes (e.g., lactase), hormones (e.g., insulin), and motor proteins (e.g., actin)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 137px;\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 125.594px; height: 137px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lipids<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 223.906px; height: 137px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Insoluble in water due to hydrophilic (water-loving) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 346.562px; height: 137px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fats, such as triglycerides, store energy for your body<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Steroid hormones (e.g., estrogen and testosterone) act as chemical messengers to communicate between cells and tissues, as well as biochemical pathways inside of the cell<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 80px;\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 125.594px; height: 80px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carbohydrates<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 223.906px; height: 80px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large group of organic molecules that are composed of carbon and hydrogen atoms<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 346.562px; height: 80px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Starches and sugars, including blood glucose, provide cells with energy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 78px;\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 125.594px; height: 78px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleic Acids<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 223.906px; height: 78px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carries the genetic information of an organism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt; border: 1pt solid #000000; width: 346.562px; height: 78px;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">RNA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Cells<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1665, Robert Hooke observed slices of plant cork using a microscope. Hooke noted that the microscopic plant structures he saw resembled <em>cella,<\/em> meaning \u201ca small room\u201d in Latin. Approximately two centuries later, biologists recognized the cell as being the most fundamental unit of life and that all life is composed of cells. Cellular organisms can be characterized as two main cell types: <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_596\">prokaryotes<\/a><\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_598\">eukaryotes<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.2).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_77\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77\" style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"\/explorationsclone\/part\/figure-3-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"wp-image-70\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/cellsfinal-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Prokaryote and eukaryote cells. A full text description of this image is available using link in the caption.\" width=\"468\" height=\"370\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-77\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.2: Prokaryotic cell and eukaryotic cell. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: Prokaryote vs. eukaryote original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Prokaryotes include bacteria and archaea, and they are composed of a single cell. Additionally, their DNA and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_600\">organelles<\/a><\/strong> are not surrounded by individual membranes. Thus, no compartments separate their DNA from the rest of the cell (see Figure 4.2). It is well known that some bacteria can cause illness in humans. For instance, <em>Escherichia coli<\/em> (<em>E. coli<\/em>) and <em>Salmonella<\/em> contamination can result in food poisoning symptoms. Pneumonia and strep throat are caused by <em>Streptococcal<\/em> bacteria. <em>Neisseria gonorrhoeae<\/em> is a sexually transmitted bacterial disease. Although bacteria are commonly associated with illness, not all bacteria are harmful. For example, researchers are studying the relationship between the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_602\">microbiome<\/a> <\/strong>and human health. The bacteria that are part of the healthy human microbiome perform beneficial roles, such as digesting food, boosting the immune system, and even making vitamins (e.g., B12 and K).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Eukaryotes can be single-celled or multi-celled in their body composition. In contrast to prokaryotes, eukaryotes possess membranes that surround their DNA and organelles. An example of a single-celled eukaryote is the microscopic algae found in ponds (phytoplankton), which can produce oxygen from the sun. Yeasts are also single-celled, and fungi can be single- or multicellular. Plants and animals are all multicellular.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although plant and animal cells have a surprising number of similarities, there are some key differences (Figure 4.3). For example, plant cells possess a thick outer cell membrane made of a fibrous carbohydrate called cellulose. Animal and plant cells also have different <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_604\">tissues<\/a><\/strong>. For most plants, the outermost layer of cells forms a waxy cuticle that helps to protect the cells and to prevent water loss. Humans have skin, which is the outermost cell layer that is predominantly composed of a tough protein called keratin. Overall, humans have a diversity of tissue types (e.g., cartilage, brain, and heart).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_77-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77-2\" style=\"width: 2560px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-71 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/3.x3ai-01-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Plant and animal cells. A full text description of this image is available using link in the caption.\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1162\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-77-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.3: Plant cell compared to an animal cell. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Simple_plant_and_animal_cell.svg\">Simple plant and animal cell<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> has been modified (labels added) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Animal Cell Organelles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An animal cell is surrounded by a double membrane called the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_606\">phospholipid bilayer<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.4). A closer look reveals that this protective barrier is made of lipids and proteins that provide structure and function for cellular activities, such as regulating the passage of molecules and ions (e.g., H<sub>2<\/sub>O and sodium) into and out of the cell. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_608\">Cytoplasm<\/a><\/strong> is the jelly-like matrix inside of the cell membrane. Part of the cytoplasm comprises organelles, which perform different specialized tasks for the cell (Figure 4.5). An example of an organelle is the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_610\">nucleus<\/a><\/strong>, where the cell\u2019s DNA is located.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 555px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1.png\" alt=\"Cell wall of a phospholipid bilayer with embedded channels, carbohydrates, and proteins.\" width=\"555\" height=\"270\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.4: A phospholipid bilayer with membrane-bound carbohydrates and proteins. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/anatomy-and-physiology\/pages\/3-1-the-cell-membrane#fig-ch03_01_03\">Cell Membrane (Anatomy &amp; Physiology, Figure 3.4)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 547px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-1.png\" alt=\"Animal cell with various organelles labeled.\" width=\"547\" height=\"415\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.5: An animal cell with membrane-enclosed organelles. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/Organelle?id=147\">Organelle<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another organelle is the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_612\">mitochondrion<\/a><\/strong>. Mitochondria are often referred to as \u201cpowerhouse centers\u201d because they produce energy for the cell in the form of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_616\">adenosine triphosphate (ATP)<\/a><\/strong>. Depending on the species and tissue type, multicellular eukaryotes can have hundreds to thousands of mitochondria in each of their cells. Scientists have determined that mitochondria were once <em>symbiotic<\/em> prokaryotic organisms (i.e., helpful bacteria) that transformed into cellular organelles over time. This evolutionary explanation helps explain why mitochondria also have their own DNA, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_618\">mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)<\/a><\/strong>. All organelles have important physiological functions and disease can occur when organelles do not perform their role optimally. Figure 4.6 lists other organelles found in the cell and their specialized cellular roles.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 399pt;\" border=\"1pt solid rgb(0, 0, 0)\" cellpadding=\"5pt\">\n<caption>Figure 4.6: This table depicts the names of organelles and their cellular functions. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Cell Structure table (Figure 3.11)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Hayley Mann, Xazmin Lowman, and Malaina Gaddis is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell structure<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Description<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 36pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Centrioles<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Assist with the organization of mitotic spindles, which extend and contract for the purpose of cellular movement during mitosis and meiosis.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 36pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cytoplasm<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gelatinous fluid located inside of cell membrane that contains organelles.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuous membrane with the nucleus that helps transport, synthesize, modify, and fold proteins. Rough ER has embedded ribosomes, whereas smooth ER lacks ribosomes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Golgi body<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Layers of flattened sacs that receive and transmit messages from the ER to secrete and transport proteins within the cell.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lysosome<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Located in the cytoplasm; contains enzymes to degrade cellular components.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Microtubule<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Involved with cellular movement including intracellular transport and cell division.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mitochondrion<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Responsible for cellular respiration, where energy is produced by converting nutrients into ATP.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleolus<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Resides inside of the nucleus and is the site of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_620\">ribosomal RNA (rRNA)<\/a><\/strong> transcription, processing, and assembly.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt;\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleopore<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pores in the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_622\">nuclear envelope<\/a><\/strong> that are selectively permeable.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleus<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Contains the cell\u2019s DNA and is surrounded by the nuclear envelope.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ribosome<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent; padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt; border: solid #000000 1pt;\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Located in the cytoplasm and also the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Messenger RNA (mRNA) binds to ribosomes and proteins are synthesized.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Introduction to Genetics<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetics is the study of heredity. Biological parents pass down their genetic traits to their offspring. Although children resemble their parents, genetic traits often vary in appearance or molecular function. For example, two parents with normal color vision can sometimes produce a son with red-green colorblindness. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_624\">Molecular geneticists<\/a> <\/strong>study the biological mechanisms responsible for creating variation between individuals, such as DNA <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_626\">mutations<\/a><\/strong> (see Chapter 5), cell division, and genetic regulation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_628\">Molecular anthropologists<\/a><\/strong> use genetic data to test anthropological questions. Some of these anthropologists utilize <strong>ancient DNA (aDNA)<\/strong>, which is DNA that is extracted from anything once living, including human, animal, and plant remains. Over time, DNA becomes degraded (i.e., less intact), but specialized laboratory techniques can make copies of short degraded aDNA segments, which can then be reassembled to provide more complete DNA information.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Structure<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The discovery, in 1953, of the molecular structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was one of the greatest scientific achievements of all time. Using X-ray crystallography, Rosalind Franklin (Figure 4.7) provided an image that clearly showed the double helix shape of DNA. Due to controversy, Franklin\u2019s colleagues received more recognition for the DNA discovery. In 1962, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins won the Nobel Prize, while Franklin, who had died in 1958, was not honoured. Today, her vital contributions and scientific skill are widely recognized.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 223px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-1.png\" alt=\"Historic photo of woman looking into a microscope.\" width=\"223\" height=\"268\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.7: Chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Rosalind_Franklin.jpg\">Rosalind Franklin<\/a> from the personal collection of Jenifer Glynn by MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The double helix shape of DNA can be described as a twisted ladder (Figure 4.8). More specifically, DNA is a double-stranded molecule with its two strands oriented in opposite directions (i.e., antiparallel). Each strand is composed of <strong>nucleotides <\/strong>with a<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_634\">sugar phosphate backbone<\/a><\/strong>. There are four different types of DNA nucleotides: adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G). The two DNA strands are held together by nucleotide <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_636\">base pairs<\/a><\/strong>, which have chemical bonding rules. The complementary base-pairing rules are as follows: A and T bond with each other, while C and G form a bond. The chemical bonds between A-T and C-G are formed by \u201cweak\u201d hydrogen atom interactions, which means the two strands can be easily separated. A DNA sequence is the order of nucleotide bases (A, T, G, C) along only one DNA strand. If one DNA strand has the sequence CATGCT, then the other strand will have a complementary sequence GTACGA. This is an example of a short DNA sequence. In reality, there are approximately three billion DNA base pairs in human cells.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 341px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3.jpg\" alt=\"Double helix structure of DNA.\" width=\"341\" height=\"400\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.8: Structural components that form double-stranded nucleic acid (DNA). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Difference_DNA_RNA-EN.svg\">Difference DNA RNA-EN<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a> (translation by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a>, cropped by Katie Nelson) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Is Highly Organized within the Nucleus<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">If you removed the DNA from a single human cell and stretched it out completely, it would measure approximately two meters (about 6.5 feet). Therefore, DNA molecules must be compactly organized in the nucleus. To achieve this, the double helix configuration of DNA undergoes coiling. An analogy would be twisting a string until coils are formed and then continuing to twist so that secondary coils are formed, and so on. To assist with coiling, DNA is first wrapped around proteins called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_638\">histones<\/a><\/strong>. This creates a complex called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_640\">chromatin<\/a>,<\/strong> which resembles \u201cbeads on a string\u201d (Figure 4.9). Next, chromatin is further coiled into a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_642\">chromosome<\/a><\/strong>. Another important feature of DNA is that chromosomes can be altered from tightly coiled (chromatin) to loosely coiled (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_644\">euchromatin<\/a><\/strong>). Most of the time, chromosomes in the nucleus remain in a euchromatin state so that DNA sequences are accessible for regulatory processes to occur.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 558px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-2.png\" alt=\"Illustrates how chromosomes are made up of various components. \" width=\"558\" height=\"534\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.9: The hierarchical organization of chromosomes. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>.\u00a0Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/glossary\/index.cfm?id=102\">Histone (2019)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 256px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-1.png\" alt=\"Chromatid is divided into a short and long arm, bound by a centromere. \" width=\"256\" height=\"296\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.10: The regions of a chromosome. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Chromosome (Figure 3.16)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p>Human body cells typically have 23 pairs of chromosomes, for a total of 46 chromosomes in each cell\u2019s nucleus. An interesting fact is that the number of chromosomes an organism possesses varies by species, and this figure is not dependent upon the size or complexity of the organism. For instance, chimpanzees have a total of 48 chromosomes, while hermit crabs have 254. Chromosomes also have a distinct physical structure, including <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_646\">centromeres<\/a> <\/strong>(the \u201ccenter\u201d) and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_648\">telomeres<\/a> <\/strong>(the ends) (Figure 4.10). Because of the centromeric region, chromosomes are described as having two different \u201carms,\u201d where one arm is long and the other is shorter. Centromeres play an important role during cell division, which will be discussed in the next section. Telomeres are located at the ends of chromosomes; they help protect the chromosomes from degradation after every round of cell division.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: First Nation Immunity and European Diseases\u2014A Study of Ancient DNA<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1.png\" alt=\"A group of people in historic clothing, some with traditional shawls, eat under a tent.\" width=\"300\" height=\"184\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.11a: Tsimshian Native Americans of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/central.bac-lac.gc.ca\/.redirect?app=fonandcol&amp;id=3368729&amp;lang=eng\">A group of Tsimshian people having a tea party in a tent, Lax Kw'alaams (formerly Port Simpson), B.C., c. 1890<\/a> by unknown photographer is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/pdm\">Public Domain<\/a>. This image is available from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/Pages\/home.aspx\">Library and Archives Canada<\/a>, item number 3368729.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Beginning in the early fifteenth century, First Nations progressively suffered from high mortality rates as the result of colonization from foreign powers. European-borne diseases such as measles, tuberculosis, influenza, and smallpox are largely responsible for the population collapse of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. Many Europeans who immigrated to the Americas had lived in large sedentary populations, which also included coexisting with domestic animals and pests. Although a few prehistoric Indigenous populations can be characterized as large agricultural societies (especially in Mesoamerica), their overall culture, community lifestyle, and subsistence practices were markedly different from that of Europeans. Therefore, because they did not share the same urban living environments as Europeans, it is believed that Indigenous peoples were susceptible to many European diseases.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 459px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6.jpg\" alt=\"Tsimshian territory on the coast of British Columbia next to the Hecate Strait.\" width=\"459\" height=\"594\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.11b: Tsimshian territory in present-day British Columbia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Tsimshian Territory map (Figure 3.12b)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at<a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\"> GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In 2016, a <em>Nature<\/em> article published by John Lindo and colleagues was the first to investigate whether pre-contact Indigenous peoples possessed a genetic susceptibility to European diseases. Their study included Tsimshians, a First Nation community from British Columbia (Figure 4.11a-b). DNA from both present-day and ancient individuals (who lived between 500 and 6,000 years ago) was analysed. The research team discovered that a change occurred in the <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> gene, which is a member of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) immune system molecules. MHC molecules are responsible for detecting and triggering an immune response against pathogens. Lindo and colleagues (2016) concluded that <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> gene helped Indigenous peoples adapt to their local environmental ecology. However, when European-borne epidemics occurred in the Northwest during the 1800s, a certain <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_650\">DNA sequence<\/a><\/strong> variant (allele) associated with ancient Tsimshian immunity was no longer adaptive. As the result of past selective pressures from European diseases, present-day Tsimshians have different <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> allele frequencies. The precise role that <em>HLA-DQA1 <\/em>plays in immune adaptation requires further investigation. But overall, this study serves as an example of how studying ancient DNA from the remains of deceased individuals can help provide insight into living human populations and historical events.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">DNA Replication and Cell Division<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For life to continue and flourish, cells must be able to divide. Tissue growth and cellular damage repair are also necessary to maintain an organism throughout its life. All these rely on the dynamic processes of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_652\">DNA replication<\/a><\/strong> and the <strong>cell cycle<\/strong>. The mechanisms highlighted in this section are tightly regulated and represent only part of the life cycle of a cell.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Replication <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication is the process by which new DNA is copied from an original DNA template. It is one phase of the highly coordinated cell cycle, and it requires a variety of enzymes with special functions. The creation of a complementary DNA strand from a template strand is described as <strong>semi-conservative replication<\/strong>. The result of semi-conservative replication is two separate double-stranded DNA molecules, each of which is composed of an original \u201cparent\u201d template strand and a newly synthesized \u201cdaughter\u201d DNA strand.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication progresses in three steps referred to as <strong>initiation<\/strong>, <strong>elongation,<\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_662\">termination<\/a><\/strong>. During initiation, enzymes are recruited to specific sites along the DNA sequence (Figure 4.12). For example, an initiator enzyme, called <strong>helicase<\/strong>, \u201cunwinds\u201d DNA by breaking the hydrogen bonds between the two parent strands. The unraveling of the helix into two separated strands exposes the strands and creates a fork, which is the active site of DNA replication.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 580px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7.jpg\" alt=\"Helicase enzyme splits apart 2 DNA strands. On each strand DNA polymerase matches free nucleotides.\" width=\"580\" height=\"359\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.12: DNA replication and the different enzymes associated with it. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:0323_DNA_Replication.jpg\">0323 DNA Replication<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/anatomy-and-physiology\/pages\/1-introduction\">OpenStax<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Elongation is the assembly of new DNA daughter strands from the exposed original parent strands. The two parent strands can further be classified as <strong>leading strand<\/strong> or <strong>lagging strand<\/strong> and are distinguished by the direction of replication. Enzymes called <strong>DNA polymerases<\/strong> read parent template strands in a specific direction. Complementary nucleotides are added, and the newly formed daughter strands will grow. On the leading parent strand, a DNA polymerase will create one continuous strand. The lagging parent strand is created in several disconnected sections and other enzymes fill in the missing nucleotide gaps between these sections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, termination refers to the end of DNA replication activity. It is signaled by a stop sequence in the DNA that is recognized by machinery at the replication fork. The end result of DNA replication is that the number of chromosomes are doubled so that the cell can divide into two.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Mutations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication should result in the creation of two identical DNA nucleotide sequences. However, although DNA polymerases are quite precise during DNA replication, copying mistakes are estimated to occur every 10<sup>7<\/sup> DNA nucleotides. Variation from the original DNA sequence is known as a mutation (Refer to Chapter 5). Briefly, mutations can result in single-nucleotide changes, as well as the insertion or deletion of nucleotides and repeated sequences. Depending on where they occur in the genome, mutations can be <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_672\">deleterious<\/a> <\/strong>(harmful). For example, mutations may occur in regions that control cell cycle regulation, which can result in cancer (see Special Topic: The Cell Cycle and Immortality of Cancer Cells). Many other types of mutations, however, are not harmful to an organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Regardless of their effect, the cell attempts to reduce the frequency of mutations that occur during DNA replication. To accomplish this, there are polymerases with proofreading capacities that can identify and correct mismatched nucleotides. These safeguards reduce the frequency of DNA mutations so that they only occur every 10<sup>9<\/sup> nucleotides.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitotic Cell Division<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are two types of cells in the body: <strong>germ cells <\/strong>(sperm and egg) and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_676\">somatic cells<\/a><\/strong>. The body and its various tissues comprises somatic cells. Organisms that contain two sets of chromosomes in their somatic cells are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_678\">diploid<\/a><\/strong> organisms. Humans have 46 chromosomes and they are diploid because they inherit one set of chromosomes (<em>n <\/em>= 23) from each parent. As a result, they have 23 matching pairs of chromosomes, which are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_680\">homologous chromosomes<\/a><\/strong>. As seen in Figure 4.13, homologous chromosome pairs vary in size and are generally numbered from largest (chromosome 1) to smallest (chromosome 22) with the exception of the 23rd pair, which is made up of the sex chromosomes (X and Y). Typically, the female sex is XX and the male sex is XY. Individuals inherit an X chromosome from their chromosomal mother and an X or Y from their chromosomal father.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_81\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-81\" style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-81\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/Karyotype.jpg\" alt=\"Karyotype showing pairs of chromosomes organized by size into 23 pairs.\" width=\"468\" height=\"263\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-81\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.13: The 23 human chromosome pairs. Credit: Genome (2019) by NIH National Human Genome Research Institute is in the public domain.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To grow and repair tissues, somatic cells must divide. As discussed previously, for cell division to occur, a cell must first replicate its genetic material. During DNA replication, each chromosome produces double the amount of genetic information. The duplicated arms of chromosomes are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_682\">sister chromatids<\/a>,<\/strong> and they are attached at the centromeric region. To elaborate, the number of chromosomes stays the same (<em>n<\/em> = 46); however, the amount of genetic material is doubled in the cell as the result of replication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_684\">Mitosis<\/a><\/strong> is the process of somatic cell division that gives rise to two diploid daughter cells (Figure 4.14). Once DNA and other organelles in the cell have finished replication, mitotic spindle fibres physically align each chromosome at the center of the cell. Next, the spindle fibres divide the sister chromatids and move each one to opposite sides of the cell. At this phase, there are 46 chromosomes on each side of a human cell. The cell can now divide into two fully separated daughter cells.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_88\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-88\" style=\"width: 569px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-82\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/mitosismeiosisNEW.jpg\" alt=\"The stages of mitosis and meiosis.\" width=\"569\" height=\"521\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-88\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.14: The steps of mitotic cell division and meiotic cell division. Credit: Mitosis and meiosis original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Katie Nelson is a collective work under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License. [Includes Mitosis (Figure 3.20) and Meiosis (Figure 3.21) by Mary Nelson; CC BY-NC 4.0 License.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Meiotic Cell Division<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gametogenesis is the production of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_686\">gametes<\/a><\/strong> (sperm and egg cells); it involves two rounds of cell division called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_688\">meiosis<\/a><\/strong>. Similar to mitosis, the parent cell in meiosis is diploid. However, meiosis has a few key differences, including the number of daughter cells produced (four cells, which require two rounds of cell division to produce) and the number of chromosomes each daughter cell has (see Figure 4.14).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">During the first round of division (known as meiosis I), each chromosome (<em>n<\/em> = 46) replicates its DNA so that sister chromatids are formed. Next, with the help of spindle fibres, homologous chromosomes align near the center of the cell and sister chromatids physically swap genetic material. In other words, the sister chromatids of matching chromosomes cross over with each other at matching DNA nucleotide positions. The occurrence of homologous chromosomes crossing over, swapping DNA, and then rejoining segments is called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_690\">genetic recombination<\/a><\/strong>. The \u201cgenetic shuffling\u201d that occurs in gametes increases organismal genetic diversity by creating new combinations of genes on chromosomes that are different from the parent cell. Genetic mutations can also arise during recombination. For example, there may be an unequal swapping of genetic material that occurs between the two sister chromatids, which can result in deletions or duplications of DNA nucleotides. Once genetic recombination is complete, homologous chromosomes are separated and two daughter cells are formed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The daughter cells after the first round of meiosis are <strong>haploid<\/strong>, meaning they only have one set of chromosomes (<em>n <\/em>= 23). During the second round of cell division (known as meiosis II), sister chromatids are separated and two additional haploid daughter cells are formed. Therefore, the four resulting daughter cells have one set of chromosomes (<em>n<\/em> = 23), and they also have a genetic composition that is not identical to the parent cells nor to each other.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although both sperm and egg gamete production undergo meiosis, they differ in the final number of viable daughter cells. In the case of spermatogenesis, four mature sperm cells are produced. Although four egg cells are also produced in oogenesis, only one of these egg cells will result in an ovum (mature egg). During fertilization, an egg cell and sperm cell fuse, which creates a diploid cell that develops into an embryo. The ovum also provides the cellular organelles necessary for embryonic cell division. This includes mitochondria, which is why humans, and most other multicellular eukaryotes, have the same mtDNA sequence as their mothers.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosomal Disorders: Aneuploidies<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">During mitosis or meiosis, entire deletions or duplications of chromosomes can occur due to error. For example, homologous chromosomes may fail to separate properly, so one daughter cell may end up with an extra chromosome while the other daughter cell has one less. Cells with an unexpected (or abnormal) number of chromosomes are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_694\">aneuploid<\/a><\/strong>. Adult or embryonic cells can be tested for chromosome number (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_696\">karyotyping<\/a><\/strong>). Aneuploid cells are typically detrimental to a dividing cell or developing embryo, which can lead to a loss of pregnancy. However, the occurrence of individuals being born with three copies of the 21st chromosome is relatively common; this genetic condition is known as Down Syndrome. Moreover, individuals can also be born with aneuploid sex chromosome conditions such as XXY, XXX, and XO (referring to only one X chromosome).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: The Cell Cycle and Immortality of Cancer Cells<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication is part of a series of preparatory phases that a cell undergoes prior to cell division, collectively known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_698\">interphase<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.15). During interphase, the cell not only doubles its chromosomes through DNA replication, but it also increases its metabolic capacity to provide energy for growth and division. Transition into each phase of the cell cycle is tightly controlled by proteins that serve as checkpoints. If a cell fails to pass a checkpoint, then DNA replication and\/or cell division will not continue. Some of the reasons why a cell may fail at a checkpoint is DNA damage, lack of nutrients to continue the process, or insufficient size. In turn, a cell may undergo <strong>apoptosis<\/strong>, which is a mechanism for cell death.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 617px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11.png\" alt=\"The cell cycle is mostly cell growth and DNA synthesis (interphase), followed by the mitotic phase (mitosis and cytokinesis).\" width=\"617\" height=\"433\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.15: The phases and checkpoints of the cell cycle. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/jVCgr5SL@15.43:SeU_rWbd@14\/10-2-The-Cell-Cycle\">Cell cycle (Biology 2e, Figure 10.5)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unchecked cellular growth is a distinguishing hallmark of cancer. In other words, as cancer cells grow and proliferate, they acquire the capacity to avoid death and replicate indefinitely. This uncontrolled and continuous cell division is also known as \u201cimmortality.\u201d As previously mentioned, most cells lose the ability to divide due to shortening of telomeres on the ends of chromosomes over time. One way in which cancer cells retain replicative immortality is that the length of their telomeres is continuously protected. Chemotherapy, often used to treat cancer, targets the cell cycle (especially cell division) to halt the propagation of genetically abnormal cells. Another therapeutic approach that continues to be investigated is targeting telomere activity to stop the division of cancer cells.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 296px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-1.png\" alt=\"Microscope image of irregularly shaped cells with bright nuclei.\" width=\"296\" height=\"223\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.16: A microscopic slide of HeLa cancer cells. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:HeLa-III.jpg\">HeLa-III<\/a> by National Institutes of Health (NIH) is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Researchers have exploited the immortality of cancer cells for molecular research. The oldest immortal cell line is HeLa cells (Figure 4.16), which were harvested from Henrietta Lacks, an African American woman diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1955. At that time, extracted cells frequently died during experiments, but surprisingly HeLa cells continued to replicate. Propagation of Lacks\u2019s cell line has significantly contributed to medical research, including contributing to ongoing cancer research and helping to test the polio vaccine in the 1950s. However, Lacks had not given her consent for her tumor biopsy to be used in cell culture research. Moreover, her family was unaware of the extraction and remarkable application of her cells for two decades. The history of HeLa cell origin was first revealed in 1976. The controversy voiced by the Lacks family was included in an extensive account of HeLa cells published in Rebecca Skloot\u2019s 2010 book, <em>The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks<\/em>. A film based on the book was also released in 2017 (Wolfe 2017).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"text-align: initial; font-size: 1em;\">Protein Synthesis<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">At the beginning of the chapter, we defined <em>proteins<\/em> as strings of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_702\">amino acids<\/a><\/strong> that fold into complex 3-D shapes. There are 20 standard amino acids that can be strung together in different combinations in humans, and the result is that proteins can perform an impressive amount of different functions. For instance, muscle fibres are proteins that help facilitate movement. A special class of proteins (immunoglobulins) help protect the organism by detecting disease-causing pathogens in the body. Protein hormones, such as insulin, help regulate physiological activity. Blood hemoglobin is a protein that transports oxygen throughout the body. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_704\">Enzymes<\/a> <\/strong>are also proteins, and they are catalysts for biochemical reactions that occur in the cell (e.g., metabolism). Larger-scale protein structures can be visibly seen as physical features of an organism (e.g., hair and nails).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription and Translation <\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 272px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13.jpg\" alt=\"From DNA, transcription creates pre-mRNA, is processed to mature mRNA, translated to an amino acid chain (protein)\" width=\"272\" height=\"336\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.17: The major steps of protein synthesis. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: Protein synthesis original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Nucleotides in our DNA provide the coding instructions on how to make proteins. Making proteins, also known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_706\">protein synthesis<\/a><\/strong>, can be broken down into two main steps referred to as <strong>transcription<\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_710\">translation<\/a><\/strong>. The purpose of transcription, the first step, is to make an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_712\">ribonucleic acid (RNA)<\/a><\/strong> copy of our genetic code. Although there are many different types of RNA molecules that have a variety of functions within the cell, we will mainly focus on <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_714\">messenger RNA (mRNA)<\/a><\/strong>.\u00a0Transcription concludes with the processing (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_716\">splicing<\/a><\/strong>) of the mRNA. The second step, translation, uses mRNA as the instructions for chaining together amino acids into a new protein molecule (Figure 4.17).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 340px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14.jpg\" alt=\"Single stranded RNA is composed of 4 types of nucleobases: cytosine, guanine, adenine, and uracil.\" width=\"340\" height=\"461\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.18: Structural components that form ribonucleic acid (RNA). <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Difference_DNA_RNA-EN.svg\">Difference DNA RNA-EN<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a> (translation by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a>, cropped by Katie Nelson) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unlike double-stranded DNA, RNA molecules are single-stranded nucleotide sequences (Figure 4.18). Additionally, while DNA contains the nucleotide thymine (T), RNA does not\u2014instead its fourth nucleotide is uracil (U). Uracil is complementary to (or can pair with) adenine (A), while cytosine (C) and guanine (G) continue to be complementary to each other.<\/p>\n<p>For transcription to proceed, a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_718\">gene<\/a><\/strong> must first be turned \u201con\u201d by the cell. A gene is a segment of DNA that codes for RNA, and genes can vary in length from a few hundred to as many as two million base pairs in length. The double-stranded DNA is then separated, and one side of the DNA is used as a coding template that is read by <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_720\">RNA polymerase<\/a>.<\/strong> Next, complementary free-floating RNA nucleotides are linked together (Figure 4.19) to form a single-stranded mRNA. For example, if a DNA template is TACGGATGC, then the newly constructed mRNA sequence will be AUGCCUACG.<\/p>\n<p>Genes contain segments called <strong>introns <\/strong>and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_724\">exons<\/a><\/strong>. Exons are considered \u201ccoding\u201d while introns are considered \u201cnoncoding\u201d\u2014meaning the information they contain will not be needed to construct proteins. When a gene is first transcribed into pre-mRNA, introns and exons are both included (Figure 4.20). However, once transcription is finished, introns are removed in a process called splicing. During splicing, a protein\/RNA complex attaches itself to the pre-mRNA. Next, introns are removed and the remaining exons are connected, thus creating a shorter mature mRNA that serves as a template for building proteins.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 1846px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15.jpg\" alt=\"DNA strands pulled apart making space for RNA polymerase to form mRNA using 1 DNA template strand.\" width=\"1846\" height=\"473\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.19: RNA polymerase catalyzing DNA transcription. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/glossary\/index.cfm?id=197\">Transcription (2019)<\/a>\u00a0by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> has been modified (cropped and labels changed by Katie Nelson) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_88-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-88-2\" style=\"width: 1900px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-88 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/4.20.jpg\" alt=\"Pre mRNA contains transcriptions of exons and introns. Mature mRNA only contains spliced exon mRNA.\" width=\"1900\" height=\"700\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-88-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.20: RNA processing is the modification of RNA, including the removal of introns, called splicing, between transcription and translation. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Protein synthesis (Figure 3.23)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As described above, the result of transcription is a single-stranded mRNA copy of a gene<strong>. <\/strong>Translation is the process by which amino acids are chained together to form a new protein. During translation, the mature mRNA is transported outside of the nucleus, where it is bound to a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_726\">ribosome<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.21). The nucleotides in the mRNA are read in triplets, which are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_728\">codons<\/a><\/strong>. Each mRNA codon corresponds to an amino acid, which is carried to the ribosome by a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_730\">transfer RNA<\/a> <\/strong>(tRNA). Thus, tRNAs is the link between the mRNA molecule and the growing amino acid chain.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17.jpg\" alt=\"Ribosome and tRNA read mRNA and help join amino acids to a growing polypeptide chain.\" width=\"651\" height=\"366\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.21: Translation of mRNA into a polypeptide chain composed of the twenty different types of amino acids. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/Amino-Acids?id=5\">Amino Acids<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuing with our mRNA sequence example from above, the mRNA sequence AUG-CCU-ACG codes for three amino acids. Using a codon table (Figure 4.22), AUG is a codon for methionine (Met), CCU is proline (Pro), and ACG is threonine (Thr). Therefore, the protein sequence is Met-Pro-Thr. Methionine is the most common \u201cstart codon\u201d (AUG) for the initiation of protein translation in eukaryotes. As the ribosome moves along the mRNA, the growing amino acid chain exits the ribosome and folds into a protein. When the ribosome reaches a \u201cstop\u201d codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA), the ribosome stops adding any new amino acids, detaches from the mRNA, and the protein is released. Depending upon the amino acid sequence, a linear protein may undergo additional \u201cfolding.\u201d The final three-dimensional protein shape is integral to completing a specific structural or functional task.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: Protein Synthesis<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To see protein synthesis in animation, please check out the\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yourgenome.org\/video\/from-dna-to-protein\/\">From DNA to Protein<\/a> video on YourGenome.org.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure style=\"width: 550px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-1.png\" alt=\"A circle labeled with letters for mRNA nucleotides.\" width=\"550\" height=\"541\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.22: This table can be used to identify which mRNA codons (sequence of three nucleotides) correspond with each of the 20 different amino acids. For each mRNA codon, you work in the 5\u2019 to 3\u2019 direction (inside the circle to outside). For example, if the mRNA codon is CAU, you look at the inner circle for the \u201cC,\u201d the middle circle for \u201cA,\u201d and outside circle for \u201cU,\u201d indicating that the CAU codon corresponds with the amino acid \u201chistidine\u201d (abbreviated \u201cHis\u201d or \u201cH\u201d). The table also indicates that the \u201cstart codon\u201d (AUG) correlates with Methionine, and the three \u201cstop\u201d codons are UAA, UAG, and UGA. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1AKB8mx6Ih-V-1DJ_zxTbf9Jn4puHRCPEhG1rGOlojNc\/edit?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">An accessible full text RNA codon to amino acid table is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Aminoacids_table.svg\">Aminoacids table<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Mouagip\">Mouagip<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Mendelian Genetics<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 183px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19.png\" alt=\"Stone statue of a robed monk.\" width=\"183\" height=\"239\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.23: Statue of Mendel located at the Mendel Museum, located at Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. Credit: \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mendel%C2%B4s_statue.JPG\">Mendel\u00b4s statue<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Coeli\">Coeli<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Gregor Johann Mendel (1822\u20131884) is often described as the \u201cFather of Genetics.\u201d Mendel was a monk who conducted pea plant breeding experiments in a monastery located in the present-day Czech Republic (Figure 4.23). After several years of experiments, Mendel presented his work to a local scientific community in 1865 and published his findings the following year. Although his meticulous effort was notable, the importance of his work was not recognized for another 35 years. One reason for this delay in recognition is that his findings did not agree with the predominant scientific viewpoints on inheritance at the time. For example, it was believed that parental physical traits \u201cblended\u201d together and offspring inherited an intermediate form of that trait. In contrast, Mendel showed that certain pea plant physical traits (e.g., flower color) were passed down separately to the next generation in a statistically predictable manner. Mendel also observed that some parental traits disappeared in offspring but then reappeared in later generations. He explained this occurrence by introducing the concept of \u201cdominant\u201d and \u201crecessive\u201d traits. Mendel established a few fundamental laws of inheritance, and this section reviews some of these concepts. Moreover, the study of traits and diseases that are controlled by a single gene is commonly referred to as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_732\">Mendelian genetics<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 738px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20.png\" alt=\"Pea plant variation: round\/wrinkled, yellow\/ green pods, white\/purple flowers, tall\/short stem.\" width=\"738\" height=\"304\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.24: Various phenotypic characteristics of pea plants resulting from different genotypes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mendels_peas.png\">Mendels peas<\/a> by Mariana Ruiz <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:LadyofHats\">LadyofHats<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The physical appearance of a trait is called an organism\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_734\">phenotype<\/a><\/strong>. Figure 4.24 shows pea plant (<em>Pisum sativum<\/em>) phenotypes that were studied by Mendel, and in each of these cases the physical traits are controlled by a single gene. In the case of Mendelian genetics, a phenotype is determined by an organism\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_736\">genotype<\/a><\/strong>. A genotype consists of two gene copies, wherein one copy was inherited from each parent. Gene copies are also known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_738\">alleles<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 4.25), which means they are found in the same gene location on homologous chromosomes. Alleles have a nonidentical DNA sequence, which means their phenotypic effect can be different. In other words, although alleles code for the same trait, different phenotypes can be produced depending on which two alleles (i.e., genotypes) an organism possesses. For example, Mendel\u2019s pea plants all have flowers, but their flower color can be purple or white. Flower color is therefore dependent upon which two color alleles are present in a genotype.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 771px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21.jpeg\" alt=\"Four pairs of chromosomes. Each chromosome is labeled with an allele, either capital B or lowercase b.\" width=\"771\" height=\"315\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.25: Homozygous refers to having the same alleles (e.g. two capital Bs or two lowercase bs). Heterozygous refers to having two different alleles (e.g. one capital B and one lowercase b). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/homozygous\">Homozygous<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A Punnett square is a diagram that can help visualize Mendelian inheritance patterns. For instance, when parents of known genotypes mate, a Punnett square can help predict the ratio of Mendelian genotypes and phenotypes that their offspring would possess. When discussing genotype, biologists use upper and lower case letters to denote the different allele copies. Figure 4.26 is a Punnett square that includes two <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_740\">heterozygous<\/a><\/strong> parents for flower color (Bb). A heterozygous genotype means there are two different alleles for the same gene. Therefore, a pea plant that is heterozygous for flower color has one purple allele and one white allele. When an organism is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_742\">homozygous<\/a><\/strong> for a specific trait, it means their genotype consists of two copies of the same allele. Using the Punnett square example, the two heterozygous pea plant parents can produce offspring with two different homozygous genotypes (BB or bb) or offspring that are heterozygous (Bb).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 220px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22.png\" alt=\"Pollen and Pistol (each with one capital B and one lower case b allele) merge in different combinations.\" width=\"220\" height=\"220\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.26: Punnett square depicting the possible genetic combinations of offspring from two heterozygous parents. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Punnett_square_mendel_flowers.svg\">Punnett square mendel flowers<\/a> by Madeleine Price Ball (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Madprime\">Madprime<\/a>) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A pea plant with purple flowers could be heterozygous (Bb) or homozygous (BB). This is because the purple color allele (B) is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_744\">dominant<\/a> <\/strong>to the white color allele (b), and therefore it only needs one copy of that allele to phenotypically express purple flowers. Because the white flower allele is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_746\">recessive<\/a><\/strong>, a pea plant must be homozygous for the recessive allele in order to have a white color phenotype (bb). As seen by the Punnett square example (Figure 4.26), three of four offspring will have purple flowers and the other one will have white flowers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Law of Segregation was introduced by Mendel to explain why we can predict the ratio of genotypes and phenotypes in offspring. As discussed previously, a parent will have two alleles for a certain gene (with each copy on a different homologous chromosome). The Law of Segregation states that the two copies will be segregated from each other and will each be distributed to their own gamete. We now know that the process where that occurs is meiosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Offspring are the products of two gametes combining, which means the offspring inherits one allele from each gamete for most genes. When multiple offspring are produced (like with pea plant breeding), the predicted phenotype ratios are more clearly observed. The pea plants Mendel studied provide a simplistic model to understand single-gene genetics. While many traits anthropologists are interested in have a more complicated inheritance (e.g., are informed by many genes), there are a few known Mendelian traits in humans. Additionally, some human diseases also follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance (Figure 4.27). Because humans do not have as many offspring as other organisms, we may not recognize Mendelian patterns as easily. However, understanding these principles and being able to calculate the probability that an offspring will have a Mendelian phenotype is still important.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div align=\"left\">\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"width: 422px; height: 420px;\">\n<caption>Figure 4.27: Examples of human diseases with their gene names that follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\"><strong>Mendelian disorder<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\"><strong>Gene\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Alpha Thalassemia<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">HBA1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Cystic Fibrosis<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">CFTR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Fragile X Syndrome<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">FMR1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">G6PD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Hemophilia A<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">F8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Huntington disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">HTT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Mitochondrial DNA Depletion Syndrome<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">TYMP<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Oculocutaneous Albinism: Type 1<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">TYR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Polycystic Kidney Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">PKHD1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Sickle-cell anemia<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">HBB<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Spinal Muscular Atrophy: SMN1 Linked<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">SMN1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Tay-Sachs Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">HEXA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px; height: 30px;\">Wilson Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px; height: 30px;\">ATP7B<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Example of Mendelian Inheritance: The ABO Blood Group System<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1901, Karl Landsteiner at the University of Vienna published his discovery of ABO blood groups. While conducting blood immunology experiments in which he combined the blood of individuals who possess different blood cell types, he observed an agglutination (clotting) reaction. The presence of agglutination implies there is an incompatible immunological reaction; no agglutination will occur in individuals with the same blood type. This work was clearly important because it resulted in a higher survival rate of patients who received blood transfusions. Blood transfusions from someone with a different type of blood causes agglutinations, and the resulting coagulated blood can not easily pass through blood vessels, resulting in death. Landsteiner received the Nobel Prize (1930) for his discovery and explaination of the ABO blood group system.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blood <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_748\">cell surface antigens<\/a><\/strong> are proteins that coat the surface of red blood cells, and<strong> antibodies <\/strong>are specifically \u201cagainst\u201d or \u201canti\u201d to the antigens from other blood types. Thus, antibodies are responsible for causing agglutination between incompatible blood types. Understanding the interaction of antigens and antibodies helps to determine ABO compatibility amongst blood donors and recipients. Individuals that are blood type A have A antigens on the red blood cell surface, and anti-B antibodies, which will bind to B antigens should they come in contact. Alternatively, individuals with blood type B have B antigens and anti-A antibodies. Individuals with blood type AB have both A and B antigens but do not produce antibodies for the ABO system. This does not mean type AB does not have any antibodies present, just that specifically anti-A and anti-B antibodies are not produced. Individuals who are blood type O have nonspecific antigens and produce both anti-A and anti-B antibodies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Figure 4.28 shows a table of the ABO allele system, which has a Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Both the A and B alleles function as dominant alleles, so the A allele always codes for the A antigen, and the B allele codes for the B antigen. The O allele differs from A and B, because it codes for a nonfunctional antigen protein, which means there is no antigen present on the cell surface of O blood cells. To have blood type O, two copies of the O allele must be inherited, one from each parent, thus the O allele is considered recessive. Therefore, someone who is a heterozygous AO genotype is phenotypically blood type A, and a genotype of BO is blood type B. The ABO blood system also provides an example of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_752\">codominance<\/a><\/strong>, which is when both alleles are observed in the phenotype. This is true for blood type AB: when an individual inherits both the A and B alleles, then both A and B antigens will be present on the cell surface.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 425px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24.jpg\" alt=\"A table showing the genotypes that can occur from combinations of A, B, and O alleles.\" width=\"425\" height=\"177\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.28: The different combinations of ABO blood alleles (A, B, and O) to form ABO blood genotypes. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">ABO Blood Genotypes (Figure 3.33)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Also found on the surface of red blood cells is the rhesus group antigen, known as \u201cRh factor.\u201d In reality, there are several antigens on red blood cells independent from the ABO blood system, however, the Rh factor is the second most important antigen to consider when determining blood donor and recipient compatibility. Rh antigens must also be considered when a pregnant mother and her baby have incompatible Rh factors. In such cases, a doctor can administer necessary treatment steps to prevent pregnancy complications and hemolytic disease, which is when the mother\u2019s antibodies break down the newborn\u2019s red blood cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An individual can possess the Rh antigen (be Rh positive) or lack the Rh antigen (be Rh negative). The Rh factor is controlled by a single gene and is inherited independently of the ABO alleles. Therefore, all blood types can either be positive (O+, A+, B+, AB+) or negative (O-, A-, B-, AB-).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Individuals with O+ red blood cells can donate blood to A+, B+, AB+, and O+ blood type recipients. Because O- individuals do not have AB or Rh antigens, they are compatible with all blood cell types and are referred to as \u201cuniversal donors.\u201d Individuals that are AB+ are considered to be \u201cuniversal recipients\u201d because they do not possess antibodies against other blood types.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mendelian Patterns of Inheritance and Pedigrees<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <strong>pedigree<\/strong> can be used to investigate a family\u2019s medical history by determining if a health issue is inheritable and will possibly require medical intervention. A pedigree can also help determine if it is a Mendelian recessive or dominant genetic condition. Figure 4.29 is a pedigree example of a family with Huntington\u2019s disease, which has a Mendelian dominant pattern of inheritance. In a standard pedigree, males are represented by a square and females are represented by a circle. Biological family members are connected to a horizontal line, with biological parents above and offspring below. When an individual is affected with a certain condition, the square or circle is filled in as a solid color. With a dominant condition, at least one of the parents will have the disease and an offspring will have a 50% chance of inheriting the affected chromosome. Therefore, dominant genetic conditions tend to be present in every generation. In the case of Huntington\u2019s, some individuals may not be diagnosed until later in adulthood, so parents may unknowingly pass this dominantly inherited disease to their children.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 389px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25.png\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with about half the individuals shaded in. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"389\" height=\"189\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.29: A pedigree depicting an example of dominant Mendelian inheritance like Huntington\u2019s. Offspring with the trait will have at least one parent with the same trait. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Mendelian dominant pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.34)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Because the probability of inheriting a disease-causing recessive allele is more rare, recessive medical conditions can skip generations. Figure 4.30 is an example of a family that carries a recessive cystic fibrosis mutation. A parent that is heterozygous for the cystic fibrosis allele has a 50% chance of passing down their affected chromosome to the next generation. If a child has a recessive disease, then it means both of their parents are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_756\">carriers<\/a><\/strong> (heterozygous) for that condition. In most cases, carriers for recessive conditions show no serious medical symptoms. Individuals whose family have a known medical history for certain conditions sometimes seek family planning services (see the Genetic Testing section).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<figure style=\"width: 392px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26.png\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with three individuals with the trait shaded in. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"392\" height=\"215\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.30: A pedigree depicting an example of recessive Mendelian inheritance like cystic fibrosis. Individuals may have a trait not observed in the previous generation. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Mendelian recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.35)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pedigrees can also help distinguish if a health issue has either an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_758\">autosomal<\/a> <\/strong>or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_760\">X-linked<\/a><\/strong> pattern of inheritance. As previously discussed, there are 23 pairs of chromosomes and 22 of these pairs are known as autosomes. The provided pedigree examples (Figure 4.29-30) are autosomally linked genetic diseases. This means the genes that cause the disease are on one of the chromosomes numbered 1 to 22. The conditions caused by genes located on the X chromosome are referred to as X-linked diseases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Figure 4.31 depicts a family in which the mother is a carrier for the X-linked recessive disease Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). The mother is a carrier for DMD, so daughters and sons will have a 50% chance of inheriting the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_762\">pathogenic<\/a><\/strong> <em>DMD<\/em> allele. Because females have two X chromosomes, females who inherit only one copy will not have the disease (although in rare cases, female carriers may show some symptoms of the disease). On the other hand, males who inherit a copy of an X-linked pathogenic <em>DMD<\/em> allele will typically be affected with the condition. Thus, males are more susceptible to X-linked conditions because they only have one X chromosome. Therefore, when evaluating a pedigree, if a higher proportion of males are affected with the disease, this could suggest the disease is X-linked recessive. <br style=\"clear: both;\" \/><br style=\"clear: both;\" \/>Compared to the X chromosome, the Y chromosome is smaller with only a few genes. Y-linked traits are therefore rare and can only be passed from a chromosomal father to a biological XY child.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 407px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27.jpg\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with four males and one female with the trait. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"407\" height=\"236\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.31: A pedigree depicting an example of X-linked Mendelian inheritance like Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.36)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Other Patterns of Inheritance<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Complexity Surrounding Mendelian Inheritance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pea plant trait genetics are relatively simple compared to what we know about genetic inheritance today. The vast majority of genetically controlled traits are not strictly dominant or recessive, so the relationship among alleles and predicting phenotype is often more complicated. For example, traits that exhibit<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_764\">incomplete dominance<\/a><\/strong> occur when a heterozygote exhibits a phenotype that is an intermediate phenotype of both alleles. In snapdragon flowers, the red flower color (R) is dominant and white is recessive (r). Therefore, the homozygous dominant RR is red and homozygous recessive rr is white. However, because the R allele is not completely dominant, the heterozygote Rr is a blend of red and white, which results in a pink flower (Figure 4.32).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 302px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28.png\" alt=\"Snapdragon flowers in many hues.\" width=\"302\" height=\"188\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.32: Snap dragons with different genotypes resulting in different flower color phenotypes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Antirrhinum_aka_Snap_dragon_at_lalbagh_7112.JPG\">Antirrhinum a.k.a. Snap dragon at lalbagh 7112<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Rameshng\">Rameshng<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An example of incomplete dominance in humans is the enzyme \u03b2-hexosaminidase A (Hex A), which is encoded by the gene <em>HEXA<\/em>. Patients with two dysfunctional <em>HEXA <\/em>alleles are unable to metabolize a specific lipid-sugar molecule (GM2 ganglioside); because of this, the molecule builds up and causes damage to nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. This condition is known as Tay-Sachs disease, and it usually appears in infants who are three to six months old. Most children with Tay-Sachs do not live past early childhood. Individuals who are heterozygous for the functional type <em>HEXA<\/em> allele and one dysfunctional allele have reduced Hex A activity. However, the amount of enzyme activity is still sufficient, so carriers do not exhibit any neurological phenotypes and appear healthy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some genes and alleles can also have higher <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_766\">penetrance<\/a><\/strong> than others. Penetrance can be defined as the proportion of individuals who have a certain allele and also express an expected phenotype. If a genotype always produces an expected phenotype, then those alleles are said to be fully penetrant. However, in the case of incomplete (or reduced) penetrance, an expected phenotype may not occur even if an individual possesses the alleles that are known to control a trait or cause a disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A well-studied example of genetic penetrance is the cancer-related genes <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em>. Mutations in these genes can affect crucial processes such as DNA repair, which can lead to breast and ovarian cancers. Although <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em> mutations have an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, it does not mean an individual will develop cancer if they inherit a pathogenic allele. Several lifestyle and environmental factors can also influence the risk for developing cancer. Regardless, if a family has a history of certain types of cancers, then it is often recommended that genetic testing be performed for individuals who are at risk. Moreover, publically available genetic testing companies are now offering health reports that include <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em> allele testing (see the Genetic Testing section).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygenic Traits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Mendelian traits tend to be influenced by a single gene, the vast majority of human phenotypes are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_768\">polygenic traits<\/a><\/strong>. The term <em>polygenic<\/em> means \u201cmany genes.\u201d Therefore, a polygenic trait is influenced by many genes that work together to produce the phenotype. Human phenotypes such as hair color, eye color, height, and weight are examples of polygenic traits. Hair color, for example, is largely determined by the type and quantity of a pigment called melanin, which is produced by a specialized cell type within the skin called melanocytes. The quantity and ratio of melanin pigments determine black, brown, blond, and red hair colors. <em>MC1R<\/em> is a well-studied gene that encodes a protein expressed on the surface of melanocytes that is involved in the production of eumelanin pigment. Typically, people with two functional copies of <em>MC1R <\/em>have brown hair. People with reduced functioning <em>MC1R<\/em> allele copies tend to produce pheomelanin, which results in blond or red hair. However, <em>MC1R <\/em>alleles have variable penetrance, and studies are continually identifying new genes (e.g., <em>TYR<\/em>, <em>TYRP1<\/em>, <em>SLC24A5<\/em>, and <em>KITLG<\/em>) that also influence hair color. Individuals with two nonfunctioning copies of the gene <em>TYR<\/em> have a condition called oculocutaneous albinism\u2014their melanocytes are unable to produce melanin so these individuals have white hair, light eyes, and pale skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In comparison to Mendelian diseases, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_770\">complex diseases<\/a><\/strong> (e.g., Type II diabetes, coronary heart disease, Alzheimer's, and schizophrenia) are more prevalent in humans. Complex diseases are polygenic, but their development is also influenced by physical, environmental, sociocultural, and individual lifestyle factors. Families can be more predisposed to certain diseases; however, complex diseases often do not have a clear pattern of inheritance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although research of complex traits and diseases continue, geneticists may not know all of the genes involved with a given complex disease. Additionally, how much genetic versus nongenetic determinants contribute to a disease phenotype can be difficult to decipher. Therefore, predicting individual medical risk and risk across different human populations is often a significant challenge. For instance, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be one of the leading causes of death around the world. Development of CVDs has been linked to nutrient exposure during fetal development, high fat and sedentary lifestyles, drug usage, adverse socioeconomic conditions, and various genes. Human environments are diverse, and public health research including the field of Human Biology can help identify risk factors and behaviors associated with chronic diseases. Large-scale clinical genetic studies with powerful bioinformatic approaches can also help elucidate some of these complex relationships.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Genomics and Epigenetics<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_772\">genome<\/a><\/strong> is all of the genetic material of an organism. In the case of humans, this includes 46 chromosomes and mtDNA. The human genome contains approximately three billion base pairs of DNA and has regions that are both noncoding and coding. Scientists now estimate that the human genome contains 20,000\u201325,000 protein-coding genes, with each chromosome containing a few hundred to a few thousand genes. As our knowledge of heredity increases, researchers have begun to realize the importance of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_774\">epigenetics<\/a><\/strong>, or changes in gene expression that do not result in a change of the underlying DNA sequence. Epigenetics research is also crucial for unraveling gene regulation, which involves complex interactions between DNA, RNA, proteins, and the environment.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genomics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The vast majority of the human genome is noncoding, meaning there are no instructions to make a protein or RNA product in these regions. Historically, noncoding DNA was referred to as \u201cjunk DNA\u201d because these vast segments of the genome were thought to be irrelevant and nonfunctional. However, continual improvement of DNA <strong>sequencing<\/strong> technology along with worldwide scientific collaborations and consortia have contributed to our increased understanding of how the genome functions. Through these technological advances and collaborations, we have since discovered that many of these noncoding DNA regions are involved in dynamic genetic regulatory processes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genomics is a diverse field of molecular biology that focuses on genomic evolution, structure, and function; gene mapping; and <strong>genotyping <\/strong>(determining the alleles present). Evolutionary genomics determined that humans share about 98.8% percent of their DNA with chimpanzees. Given the phenotypic differences between humans and chimpanzees, having a DNA sequence difference of 1.2% seems surprising. However, a lot of genomics research is also focused on understanding how noncoding genomic regions influence how individual genes are turned \u201con\u201d and \u201coff\u201d (i.e., regulated). Therefore, although DNA sequences are identical, regulatory differences in noncoding genetic regions (e.g., promoters) are believed to be largely responsible for the physical differences between humans and chimpanzees.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Further understanding of genomic regulatory elements can lead to new therapies and personalized treatments for a broad range of diseases. For example, targeting the regulatory region of a pathogenic gene to \u201cturn off\u201d its expression can prevent its otherwise harmful effects. Such molecular targeting approaches can be personalized based on an individual\u2019s genetic makeup. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which seek to determine genes that are linked to complex traits and diseases, typically require significant computational efforts. This is because millions of DNA sequences must be analysed and GWAS sometimes include thousands of participants. During the beginning of the genomics field, most of the large-scale genomics studies only included North American, European, and East Asian participants and patients. Researchers are now focusing on increasing ethnic diversity in genomic studies and databases. In turn, accuracy of individual disease risk across all human populations will be improved and more rare disease\u2013causing alleles will be identified.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All cells within your body have the same copy of DNA. For example, a brain neuron has the same DNA blueprint as does a skin cell on your arm. Although these cells have the same genetic information, they are considered specialized. The reason all cells within the body have the same DNA but different morphologies and functions is that different subsets of genes are turned \u201con\u201d and \u201coff\u201d within the different cell types. A more precise explanation is that there is differential expression of genes among different cell types. In the case of neuronal cells, a unique subset of genes are active that allow them to grow axons to send and receive messages. This subset of genes will be inactive in non-neuronal cell types such as skin cells. Epigenetics is a branch of genetics that studies how these genes are regulated through mechanisms that do not change the underlying DNA sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The prefix <em>epi-<\/em> means \u201con, above, or near,\u201d and epigenetic mechanisms such as <strong>DNA methylation<\/strong> and histone modifications occur on, above, or near DNA. The addition of a methyl group (\u2014 CH\u2083) to DNA is known as DNA methylation (Figure 4.33). DNA methylation and other modifications made to the histones around which DNA are wrapped are thought to make chromatin more compact. This DNA is inaccessible to transcription factors and RNA polymerases, thus preventing genes from being turned on (i.e., transcribed). Other histone modifications have the opposite effect by loosening chromatin, which makes genes accessible to transcription factors.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29.png\" alt=\"Epigenetic histone tail modifications that can tighten and loosen the chromatin of DNA. \" width=\"510\" height=\"395\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.33: Different types of epigenetic histone tail modifications that can tighten (top) and loosen (bottom) the chromatin of DNA. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/jVCgr5SL@15.43:5cz8bfb2@10\/16-3-Eukaryotic-Epigenetic-Gene-Regulation\">Epigenetic Control (Biology 2e, Figure 16.7)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to note that environmental factors can alter DNA methylation and histone modifications and also that these changes can be passed from generation to generation. For example, someone\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_782\">epigenetic profile<\/a><\/strong> can be altered during a stressful time (e.g., natural disasters, famine, etc.), and those regulatory changes can be inherited by the next generation. Moreover, our epigenetic expression profile changes as we age. For example, certain places in our genome become \u201chyper\u201d or \u201chypo\u201d methylated over time. Identical twins also have epigenetic profiles that become more different as they age. Researchers are only beginning to understand the significance of these genome-wide epigenetic changes. Scientists have also discovered that changes in epigenetic modifications can alter gene expression in ways that contribute to diseases. It is also important to note that, unlike DNA mutations (which permanently change the nucleotide sequence), epigenetic changes can be easily reversed. A lot of research now focuses on how drugs can alter or modulate changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications to treat diseases such as cancer.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded no-borders\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue);\">\n<h2>Environmental Disruptors and Their Impact on Human Reproductive Systems<\/h2>\n<p>The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) defines endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) as synthetic or natural compounds that interfere with the body\u2019s hormonal systems. Found in pesticides, plastics, industrial chemicals, and pollutants, EDCs can mimic, block, or alter the natural action of hormones (NIEHS, 2024). Their effects on reproductive health are profound, particularly during critical developmental windows while also affecting subsequent generations through epigenetic changes.<\/p>\n<p>NIEHS declared EDC\u2019s:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Atrazine<\/td>\n<td>one of the most commonly applied herbicides in the world, often used to control weeds in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane crops.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Bisphenol A (BPA)<\/td>\n<td>used to make polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. It is used in manufacturing, food packaging, toys, and other applications. BPA resins may be found in the lining of some canned foods and beverages.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dioxins<\/td>\n<td>a byproduct of certain manufacturing processes, such as herbicide production and paper bleaching. They can be released into the air from waste burning and wildfires.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perchlorate<\/td>\n<td>a colorless salt manufactured and used as an industrial chemical to make rockets, explosives, and fireworks, which can be found in some groundwater.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)<\/td>\n<td>a large group of chemicals used widely in industrial applications, such as firefighting foam, nonstick pans, paper, and textile coatings.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Phthalates<\/td>\n<td>a large group of compounds used as liquid plasticizers. They are found in hundreds of products including some food packaging, cosmetics, fragrances, children\u2019s toys, and medical device tubing. Cosmetics that may contain phthalates include nail polish, hair spray, aftershave lotion, cleanser, and shampoo.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Phytoestorgens<\/td>\n<td>naturally occurring substances with hormone-like activity found in some plants; they may have a similar effect to estrogen produced by the body. Soy foods, for example, contain phytoestrogens.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)<\/td>\n<td>used to make flame retardants for products such as furniture foam and carpet.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)<\/td>\n<td>used to make electrical equipment, such as transformers, and are in hydraulic fluids, heat transfer fluids, lubricants, and plasticizers. PCBs were mass-produced globally until they were banned in 1979.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Triclosan<\/td>\n<td>an ingredient that was previously added to some antimicrobial and personal care products, like liquid body wash and soaps.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">The Male Reproductive System: Vulnerabilities, Epigenetics, and Disruptions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The male reproductive system is highly sensitive to hormonal interference, especially during prenatal and early postnatal development. Over the past 50 years, epidemiological data gathered by the NIEHS has revealed alarming changes: increased cases of prostate and testicular cancers, male-descended testes, and anatomical malformations of male genitalia (Sweeney Et al., 2015). These changes are accompanied by a global decline in sperm quality, underscoring the widespread vulnerability of male reproductive health to environmental factors. The testes, as the site of sperm production and testosterone synthesis, are particularly susceptible to EDC interference. Proper testicular development depends on tightly regulated hormonal signalling, which EDCs can disrupt by mimicking or blocking hormones like testosterone and estrogen, leading to improper testicular formation and increased risk of testicular cancer. Prostate development is also a target for EDC interference. African American men, for example, exhibit twice the risk of developing prostate cancer than Caucasian men. This disparity has been attributed to hereditary, lifestyle, and environmental factors, often causing elevated maternal estrogen levels during gestation. This prenatal exposure to EDCs can mimic estrogen and predispose developing prostate tissues to cancerous changes in adulthood (2015).<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">The Female Reproductive System: Epigenetics and Fertility Challenges<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Female fertility relies on a delicate hormonal balance to regulate processes such as ovulation, implantation, and pregnancy. EDCs can disrupt this balance by mimicking, antagonizing, or altering the action of hormones. Their interference contributes to a wide range of reproductive disorders, including early puberty, premature ovarian failure, anovulation, and infertility. Epigenetics plays a central role in female reproductive health. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and ncRNA generation are crucial for regulating ovarian and uterine function; However, EDCs can affect these regulatory mechanisms. An example of this is primordial germ cells (PGCs) in female embryos, which need to undergo extensive epigenetic reprogramming during development (Biswas Et al., 2021). This process erases genomic imprinting and reactivates the inactive X chromosome, creating a \"blank slate\" for the next generation; however, EDCs can disrupt this critical period of epigenetic resetting, leading to long-term consequences for reproductive health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The ovarian follicle\u2013the functional unit of female reproduction\u2013is particularly vulnerable to these chemicals. Being exposed to EDCs can deplete the pool of these follicles, leading to temporary or permanent infertility (2021). Additionally, EDCs interfere with estrogen receptor function, a crucial regulator of female reproductive processes. These chemicals bind to these receptors, altering the recruitment of enzymes involved in histone modification and chromatin remodelling; this disrupts gene expression patterns critical for ovarian and uterine health. One striking example is diethylstilbestrol (DES), a synthetic estrogen once prescribed to pregnant women (2021). DES exposure has been linked to ovarian cancer in subsequent generations, highlighting the transgenerational effects of EDCs on the female reproductive system. In severe cases, EDCs induce multigenerational reproductive disorders, as observed in studies linking DES to ovarian cancer in the grandchildren of exposed individuals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Epigenetic Therapy<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">Heritable Changes and Some Related Drugs<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">As has been said, epigenetics involves heritable changes in gene expression, without involving DNA alteration. These changes, being heritable and often involving abnormal DNA methylation patterns within the four DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) or histone modifications in chromatin, can lead to disease development. DNMTs (DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B) have functions specific to themselves and are at the core of the DNA methylation process. Regarding the histone modifications mentioned, histones have been recognized to mutate under various mechanisms, such as acetylation, methylation and phosphorylation. The acetylation of histones involves histone acetyltransferases (HATs), which are associated with the activation of gene transcription. This process is reversed by the deacetylation of histones, which is associated with the silencing of gene transcription under histone deacetylases (HDACs). (Peedicayil, 2006)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Epigenetic therapy, with the use of specialized drug developments, aims to correct epigenetic defects, which are reversible under pharmacological intervention, by targeting enzymes such as HATs, HDACs and DNMTs, as well as histone methyltransferases. For instance, certain drugs are being developed as DNMT inhibitors, stopping the methylation of DNA associated with inappropriate transcriptional silencing of genes, and potentially increasing haemoglobin F to help patients affected by sickle cell anemia. These DNMT inhibitor drugs have been classified under three categories based on their structures: nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides (2006). Nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors are analogues of cytosine, the nucleotide affected by methylation from DNMTs, and are incorporated into replicating DNA, replacing cytosine, thus being S-phase-specific drugs. Non-nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors are researched to reduce the myelotoxic effects of drugs directly incorporated into the DNA, and are brought into the patient differently. Antisense oligonucleotides are drugs made up of sequences of nucleotides complementary to mRNAs, made to block translation, by acting on the DNMT1 for instance. Additionally, drugs such as HDAC inhibitors help maintain the acetylation of histones, leading to apoptosis, growth arrest or differentiation of tumour cells, giving this drug an anticancer effect, suppressing tumour growth. (2006)<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">Implications with Cancers<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Research published in\u00a0<em>The Indian Journal for Medical Research<\/em> has shown that these drugs show promising results in cancer treatment trials involving solid tumours and hematological malignancies. However, they have limitations, for instance, the fact that DNMT and HDAC inhibitors could activate oncogenes due to limited specificity, leading to further tumor progression; or their high myelotoxicity levels, a side effect thought to be due to their incorporation into DNA, and nucleotide analogue inhibitors (2006). Though that is the case, it is important to know that epigenetic drugs alone or in combination with conventional anticancer drugs, may prove to be a significant advance over the use of conventional anticancer drugs, and may also be a way to prevent diseases. Additionally, combination therapy strategies targeting various epigenetic markers, such as DNMTs for cancer-related genes and non-selective HDAC inhibitors, have been shown to yield promising results, simultaneously inducing the expression of tumor suppressor genes and inhibiting the expression of key oncogenes.\u00a0<span style=\"margin: 0px; padding: 0px;\">As recently explored by researchers in\u00a0<em>Cell Death Discovery<\/em>, this specific case of combination therapy would synergistically induce gene expression while maintaining the selectivity required to increase targeting of particular tumor types based on gene expression profiles.<\/span> (Yu Et al., 2024)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">To date, the majority of cases in which epigenetic defects have led to disease pathogenesis are cancers (Peedicayil, 2006), cancer cells often developing due to uncontrolled cell growth and resistance to cell death mechanisms, made possible with abnormal DNA methylation patterns as well as histone modifications (Yu Et al., 2024). Epigenetic alterations have therefore been identified within the core of tumor progression mechanisms in cancer cells, including tumorigenesis, promotion, progression, and recurrence, suggesting epigenetic heterogeneity at the cellular level (2024). Certain drugs have been developed, showing specifically good results for cancer treatments, by inhibiting enzymes such as KMTs and KDMs. These can be added to the growing list of drugs fitting into epigenetic therapy, including DNMT and HDAC inhibitors, as well as combination therapy treatments, for cancer and other diseases.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">Purpose of Study and Future Developments<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Studying the link between epigenetics and diseases is crucial for multiple reasons, one of which is enabling scientists and researchers to better understand disease mechanisms, detect abnormal epigenetic changes, and, in turn, develop more effective treatments or possibly even prevent diseases from developing in the first place. As previously mentioned, epigenetic therapy has been shown to bring promising results in drug trials surrounding cancer treatments. Still, the range of diseases to be treated with this new pharmacology approach is vast, molecules other than DNMTs and HDACs being related to epigenetic mechanisms within gene expression, such as BET proteins and KDMs, potentially being a source of new medications or treatments (Yu Et al., 2024; Peedicayil, 2006). Additionally, by understanding someone's epigenetic profile, a form of personalized \u201cprecision medicine\u201d (2024, p. 8) is developed, offering less toxic and more effective treatments with fewer undesired side effects. Researchers expanding this field of knowledge would be able to understand, in more concrete terms, how external factors are linked to epigenetic changes and, consequently, disease risk, potentially halting disease progression and developing new prevention mechanisms. Personalized medicine combines both genetic and epigenetic data, including gene expression profiles, DNA methylation patterns, histone modification profiles, and identified biomarkers, to create precise disease management and prediction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">It is crucial to keep in mind that diseases like cancer are linked to major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, which could be reduced with therapeutic medicine such as epigenetic therapy, aiming to detect cancer biomarkers to improve risk assessment, diagnosis, and targeted treatment interventions, limiting the burden of chronic and life-threatening diseases. With the advancement of epigenetic therapies, new sequencing techniques, as well as AI (2024), have opened avenues to establish precision diagnostics and therapeutics for patients.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">With this said, epigenetics is a relatively new area of scientific research. This field has exploded in the last few decades, especially with the advancement of technologies that allow researchers to examine DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA molecules across the genome. While the potential of epigenetics in explaining complex diseases, including those linked to environmental factors such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), is immense, we\u2019ve identified two key challenges. One major limitation is the complexity and variability of epigenetic marks. These modifications can differ significantly across cell types, tissues, and even individuals, making it difficult to generalize findings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Additionally, epigenetic changes are dynamic and can fluctuate over time, which complicates the task of linking them to specific environmental exposures or health outcomes. Another challenge lies in the transgenerational aspect of epigenetics. While it's clear that epigenetic changes can be passed from one generation to the next, the mechanisms behind this inheritance are not fully understood. It's also difficult to pinpoint exactly when and how these modifications occur in development, especially since environmental exposures may affect individuals at different stages of their life, with varying effects depending on the timing and dose.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2>Special Topic: Epigenetics and X Chromosome Inactivation<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 181px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30.jpg\" alt=\"A cat that has a multicolored coat pattern in colors of black, orange, and white.\" width=\"181\" height=\"201\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.34: A multicolored coat pattern as the result of X chromosome inactivation during development. Credit: \u201cRue\u201d the calico cat by Hayley Mann is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mary Lyon was a British geneticist who presented a hypothesis for X chromosome inactivation (called the <em>Lyon hypothesis<\/em>) based on her work and other studies of the day. Females inherit two X chromosomes, one from each parent. Males have one functional X chromosome; however, this does not mean females have more active genes than males. During the genetic embryonic development of many female mammals, one of the X chromosomes is inactivated at random, so females have one functional X chromosome. The process of X chromosome inactivation in females occurs through epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications. Recent studies have analysed the role of a long noncoding RNA called X-inactive specific transcript (XIST), which is largely responsible for the random silencing of one of the X chromosomes. The presence of two X chromosomes is the signal for XIST RNA to be expressed so that one X chromosome can be inactivated. However, some cells may have an active paternal X chromosome while other cells may have an active maternal X chromosome. This phenomenon is easily seen in calico and tortoiseshell cats (Figure 4.34). In cats, the gene that controls coat color is found on the X chromosome. During early embryo development, random inactivation of X chromosomes gives rise to populations of cells that express black or orange, which results in the unique coat patterning. Therefore, calico cats are typically always female.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic Testing<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To assist with public health efforts, newborn screening for genetic diseases has been available in the United States for over 50 years. One of the first available genetic tests was to confirm a phenylketonuria (PKU) diagnosis in infants, which is easily treatable with a dietary change. Currently, each state decides what genes are included on newborn screening panels and some states even have programs to help with infant medical follow-ups. There are now hundreds of laboratories that provide testing for a few thousand different genes that can inform medical decisions for infants and adults. Moreover, genetic testing has been made available publicly to anyone without the assistance of medical professionals.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Clinical Testing<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clinical genetics tests assist patients with making medically informed decisions about family planning and health. Applications of this technology include assistance with<em> in vitro<\/em> fertilization (IVF) procedures, embryo genetic screening, and personalized medicine such as matching patients to cancer therapies. To ensure accuracy of patient genetic screening, it is important that all clinical laboratories are regulated. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) are United States federal standards that all human laboratory testing clinics must follow. A major benefit provided by some clinical genetic testing companies is access to genetic counselors, who have specialized education and training in medical genetics and counseling. For individuals with a family history of genetic disease, a physician may recommend genetic carrier screening to see if there is a risk for passing on a disease to a child. Genetic counselors provide expertise with interpretation of genetic testing results, as well as help guide and support patients when making impactful medical decisions.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is the purpose of DNA replication? Explain in a few sentences what happens during DNA replication. When do DNA mutations happen? And how does this create phenotypic variation (i.e., different phenotypes of the same physical trait)?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Using your own words, what are homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids? What are the key differences between mitosis and meiosis?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Determine if the pedigree diagram below (Figure 4.40) represents an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance. You should write the genotype (i.e., AA, Aa, or aa) above each square to help you (note: there may sometimes be two possible answers for a square\u2019s genotype). Please also explain why you concluded a particular pattern of inheritance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 247px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image36.png\" alt=\"Pedigree where 6 of 15 individuals have the trait. On 2 separate branches parents without the trait have a biological child who does.\" width=\"247\" height=\"214\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.40: A four generation pedigree depicting a trait with an undetermined inheritance pattern. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.46)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Use base pairing rules to transcribe the following DNA template sequence into mRNA: GTAAAGGTGCTGGCCATC. Next, use the protein codon table (see Figure 4.21) to translate the sequence. In regard to transcription, explain what the significance is of the first and last codon\/protein in the sequence.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">In your opinion, what do you think the benefits are of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing? What are the drawbacks and\/or greater ethical concerns? Do you think benefits outweigh concerns?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Imagine that you submit your DNA sample to a genetic testing company and among the various diseases for which they test, there is an allele that is associated with late-onset Alzheimer\u2019s disease. You have the option to view your Alzheimer\u2019s result or to not view your result. What do you do and why?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)<\/strong>: A high-energy compound produced by mitochondria that powers cellular processes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Allele<\/strong>: A nonidentical DNA sequence found in the same gene location on a homologous chromosome, or gene copy, that codes for the same trait but produces a different phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Amino acids<\/strong>: Organic molecules that are the building blocks of protein. Each of the 20 different amino acids have their own unique chemical property. Amino acids are chained together to form proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ancient DNA (aDNA)<\/strong>: DNA that is extracted from organic remains and that often dates from hundreds to thousands of years ago. Also, aDNA is typically degraded (i.e., damaged) due to exposure to the elements such as heat, acidity, and humidity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Aneuploid<\/strong>: A cell with an unexpected amount of chromosomes. The loss or gain of chromosomes can occur during mitotic or meiotic division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Antibodies<\/strong>: Immune-related proteins that can detect and bind to foreign substances in the blood such as pathogens.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Apoptosis<\/strong>: A series of molecular steps that is activated leading to cell death. Apoptosis can be activated when a cell fails checkpoints during the cell cycle; however, cancer cells have the ability to avoid apoptosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Autosomal<\/strong>: Refers to a pattern of inheritance in which an allele is located on an autosome (non sex chromosome).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Base pairs<\/strong>: Chemical bonding between nucleotides. In DNA, adenine (A) pairs with thymine (T) and cytosine (C) pairs with guanine (G); in RNA, adenine (A) always pairs with uracil (U).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carbohydrate<\/strong>: Molecules composed of carbon and hydrogen atoms that can be broken down to supply energy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carrier<\/strong>: An individual who has a heterozygous genotype that is typically associated with a disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell cycle<\/strong>: A cycle the cell undergoes with checkpoints between phases to ensure that DNA replication and cell division occur properly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell surface antigen<\/strong>: A protein that is found on a red blood cell\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Centromere<\/strong>: A structural feature that is defined as the \u201ccenter\u201d of a chromosome and that creates two different arm lengths. This term also refers to the region of attachment for microtubules during mitosis and meiosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromatin<\/strong>: DNA wrapped around histone complexes. During cell division, chromatin becomes a condensed chromosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosome<\/strong>: DNA molecule that is wrapped around protein complexes, including histones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Codominance<\/strong>: The effects of both alleles in a genotype can be seen in the phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Codons<\/strong>: A sequence that comprises three DNA nucleotides that together code for a protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Complex diseases<\/strong>: A category of diseases that are polygenic and are also influenced by environment and lifestyle factors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cytoplasm<\/strong>: The \u201cjelly-like\u201d matrix inside of the cell that contains many organelles and other cellular molecules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deleterious<\/strong>: A mutation that increases an organism\u2019s susceptibility to disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)<\/strong>: A molecule that carries the hereditary information passed down from parents to offspring. DNA can be described as a \u201cdouble helix\u201d\u2019 shape. It includes two chains of nucleotides held together by hydrogen bonds with a sugar phosphate backbone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diploid<\/strong>: Refers to an organism or cell with two sets of chromosomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA methylation<\/strong>: Methyl groups bind DNA, which modifies the transcriptional activity of a gene by turning it \u201con\u201d or \u201coff.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA polymerase<\/strong>: Enzyme that adds nucleotides to existing nucleic acid strands during DNA replication. These enzymes can be distinguished by their processivity (e.g., DNA replication).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA replication<\/strong>: Cellular process in which DNA is copied and doubled.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA sequence<\/strong>: The order of nucleotide bases. A DNA sequence can be short, long, or representative of entire chromosomes or organismal genomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominant<\/strong>: Refers to an allele for which one copy is sufficient to be visible in the phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Elongation<\/strong>: The assembly of new DNA from template strands with the help of DNA polymerases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Enzymes<\/strong>: Proteins responsible for catalyzing (accelerating) various biochemical reactions in cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetic profile<\/strong>: The methylation pattern throughout a genome\u2014that is, which genes (and other genomic sites) are methylated and unmethylated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetics<\/strong>: Changes in gene expression that do not result in a change of the underlying DNA sequence. These changes typically involve DNA methylation and histone modifications. These changes are reversible and can also be inherited by the next generation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Euchromatin<\/strong>: Loosely coiled chromosomes found within the nucleus that are accessible for regulatory processing of DNA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Eukaryote<\/strong>: Single-celled or multicelled organism characterized by a distinct nucleus, with each organelle surrounded by its own membrane.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exon<\/strong>: Protein-coding segment of a gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gametes<\/strong>: Haploid cells referred to as an egg and sperm that will fuse together during sexual reproduction to form a diploid organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene<\/strong>: Segment of DNA that contains protein-coding information and various regulatory (e.g., promoter) and noncoding (e.g., introns) regions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genetic recombination<\/strong>: A cellular process that occurs during meiosis I in which homologous chromosomes pair up and sister chromatids on different chromosomes physically swap genetic information.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genome<\/strong>: All the genetic information of an organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotype<\/strong>: The combination of two alleles that code for or are associated with the same gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotyping<\/strong>: A molecular procedure that is performed to test for the presence of certain alleles or to discover new ones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Germ cells<\/strong>: Specialized cells that form gametes (egg and sperm cells).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Haploid<\/strong>: Cell or organism with one set of chromosomes (<em>n<\/em> = 23).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Helicase<\/strong>: A protein that breaks the hydrogen bonds that hold double-stranded DNA together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterozygous<\/strong>: Genotype that consists of two different alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Histones<\/strong>: Proteins that DNA wraps around to assist with DNA organization within the nucleus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homologous chromosomes<\/strong>: A matching pair of chromosomes wherein one chromosome is maternally inherited and the other is paternally inherited.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homozygous<\/strong>: Genotype that consists of two identical alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Incomplete dominance<\/strong>: Heterozygous genotype that produces a phenotype that is a blend of both alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Initiation<\/strong>: The recruitment of proteins to separate DNA strands and begin DNA replication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interphase<\/strong>: Preparatory period of the cell cycle when increased metabolic demand allows for DNA replication and doubling of the cell prior to cell division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Introns<\/strong>: Segment of DNA that does not code for proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Karyotyping<\/strong>: The microscopic procedure wherein the number of chromosomes in a cell is determined.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Lagging strand<\/strong>: DNA template strand that is opposite to the leading strand during DNA replication. This strand is created in several disconnected sections and other enzymes fill in the missing nucleotide gaps between these sections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Leading strand<\/strong>: DNA template strand in which replication proceeds continuously.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Lipids<\/strong>: Fatty acid molecules that serve various purposes in the cell, including energy storage, cell signaling, and structure.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Meiosis<\/strong>: The process that gametes undergo to divide. The end of meiosis results in four haploid daughter cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mendelian genetics<\/strong>: A classification given to phenotypic traits that are controlled by a single gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Messenger RNA (mRNA)<\/strong>: RNA molecule that is transcribed from DNA. Its tri-nucleotide codons are \u201cread\u201d by a ribosome to build a protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microarray technology<\/strong>: A genotyping procedure that utilizes a microarray chip, which is a collection of thousands of short nucleotide sequences attached to a solid surface that can probe genomic DNA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microbiome<\/strong>: The collective genomes of the community of microorganisms that humans have living inside of their bodies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)<\/strong>: Circular DNA segment found in mitochondria that is inherited maternally.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitochondrion<\/strong>: Specialized cellular organelle that is the site for energy production. It also has its own genome (mtDNA).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitosis<\/strong>: The process that somatic cells undergo to divide. The end of mitosis results in two diploid daughter cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecular anthropologists<\/strong>: Individuals who use molecular techniques (primarily genetics) to compare ancient and modern populations and to study living populations of humans and nonhuman primates.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecular geneticists<\/strong>: Biologists that study the structure and function of genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutation<\/strong>: A nucleotide sequence variation from the template DNA strand that can occur during replication. Mutations can also happen during recombination.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Next-generation sequencing<\/strong>: A genotyping technology that involves producing millions of nucleotide sequences (from a single DNA sample) that are then read with a sequencing machine. It can be used for analyzing entire genomes or specific regions and requires extensive program-based applications.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nuclear envelope<\/strong>: A double-layered membrane that encircles the nucleus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleic acid<\/strong>: A complex structure (like DNA or RNA) that carries genetic information about a living organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleotide<\/strong>: The basic structural component of nucleic acids, which includes DNA (A, T, C, and G) and RNA (A, U, C, and G).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleus<\/strong>: Double-membrane cellular organelle that helps protect DNA and also regulates nuclear activities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Organelle<\/strong>: A structure within a cell that performs specialized tasks that are essential for the cell. There are different types of organelles, each with its own function.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pathogenic<\/strong>: A genetic mutation (i.e., allele) that has a harmful phenotypic disease-causing effect.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pedigree<\/strong>: A diagram of family relationships that indicates which members may have or carry certain genetic and\/or phenotypic traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Penetrance<\/strong>: The proportion of how often the possession of an allele results in an expected phenotype. Some alleles are more penetrant than others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phenotype<\/strong>: The physical appearance of a given trait.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phospholipid bilayer<\/strong>: Two layers of lipids that form a barrier due to the properties of a hydrophilic (water-loving) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygenic trait<\/strong>: A phenotype that is controlled by two or more genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)<\/strong>: A molecular biology procedure that can make copies of genomic DNA segments. A small amount of DNA is used as a starting template and is then used to make millions of copies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Prokaryote<\/strong>: A single-celled organism characterized by the lack of a nucleus and membrane-enclosed organelles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Promoter<\/strong>: The region of a gene that initiates transcription. Transcription factors can bind and DNA methylation may occur at a promoter site, which can modify the transcriptional activities of a gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Protein<\/strong>: Chain of amino acids that folds into a three-dimensional structure that allows a cell to function in a variety of ways.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Protein synthesis<\/strong>: A multi-step process by which amino acids are strung together by RNA machinery read from a DNA template.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Recessive<\/strong>: Refers to an allele whose effect is not normally seen unless two copies are present in an individual\u2019s genotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribonucleic acid (RNA)<\/strong>: Single-stranded nucleic acid molecule.There are different RNAs found within cells and they perform a variety of functions, such as cell signaling and involvement in protein synthesis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribosomal RNA (rRNA)<\/strong>: A ribosome-bound molecule that is used to correctly assemble amino acids into proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribosome<\/strong>: An organelle in the cell found in the cytoplasm or endoplasmic reticulum. It is responsible for reading mRNA and protein assemblage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>RNA polymerase<\/strong>: An enzyme that catalyzes the process of making RNA from a DNA template.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sanger-sequencing<\/strong>: A process that involves the usage of fluorescently labeled nucleotides to visualize DNA (PCR fragments) at the nucleotide level.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Semi-conservative replication<\/strong>: DNA replication in which new DNA is replicated from an existing DNA template strand.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sequencing<\/strong>: A molecular laboratory procedure that produces the order of nucleotide bases (i.e., sequences).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sister chromatids<\/strong>: During DNA replication, sister chromatids are produced on the chromosome. In cell division, sister chromatids are pulled apart so that two cells can be formed. In meiosis, sister chromatids are also the sites of genetic recombination.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Somatic cells<\/strong>: Diploid cells that comprise body tissues and undergo mitosis for maintenance and repair of tissues.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Splicing<\/strong>: The process by which mature mRNAs are produced. Introns are removed (spliced) and exons are joined together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sugar phosphate backbone<\/strong>: A biochemical structural component of DNA. The \u201cbackbone\u201d consists of deoxyribose sugars and phosphate molecules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Telomere<\/strong>: A compound structure located at the ends of chromosomes to help protect the chromosomes from degradation after every round of cell division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Termination<\/strong>: The halt of DNA replication activity that occurs when a DNA sequence \u201cstop\u201d codon is encountered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tissue<\/strong>: A cluster of cells that are morphologically similar and perform the same task.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription<\/strong>: The process by which DNA nucleotides (within a gene) are copied, which results in a messenger RNA molecule.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription factors<\/strong>: Proteins that bind to regulatory regions of genes (e.g., promoter) and increase or decrease the amount of transcriptional activity of a gene, including turning them \u201con\u201d or \u201coff.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transfer RNA (tRNA)<\/strong>: RNA molecule involved in translation. Transfer RNA transports amino acids from the cell\u2019s cytoplasm to a ribosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Translation<\/strong>: The process by which messenger RNA codons are read and amino acids are \u201cchained together\u201d to form proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>X-linked<\/strong>: Refers to a pattern of inheritance where the allele is located on the X or Y chromosome.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\">National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ghr.nlm.nih.gov\/\">Genetics Home Reference<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knowgenetics.org\/\">Genetics Generation<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.yourgenome.org\/\">yourgenome<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">NOVA. 2018. Gene Sequencing Speeds Diagnosis of Deadly Newborn Diseases. NOVA, March 7, 2018. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/next\/body\/newborn-gene-sequencing\/\">https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/next\/body\/newborn-gene-sequencing\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zimmer, Carl. N.d. \u201cCarl Zimmer\u2019s Game of Genomes.\u201d STATnews. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/feature\/game-of-genomes\/season-one\/\">https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/feature\/game-of-genomes\/season-one\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Illumina. 2016. \u201cIllumina Sequencing by Synthesis.\u201d YouTube.com, October 5, 2016. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fCd6B5HRaZ8\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fCd6B5HRaZ8<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke, Ieke B. Ginjaar, and Kate Bushby. 2016. \u201cThe Importance of Genetic Diagnosis for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.\u201d Journal of Medical Genetics 53 (3): 145\u2013151.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Acuna-Hidalgo, Rocio, Joris A. Veltman, and Alexander Hoischen. 2016. \u201cNew Insights into the Generation and Role of De Novo Mutations in Health and Disease.\u201d Genome Biology 17 (241): 1\u201319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Albert, Benjamin, Susanna Tomassetti, Yvonne Gloor, Daniel Dilg, Stefano Mattarocci, Slawomir Kubik, Lukas Hafner, and David Shore. 2019. \"Sfp1 Regulates Transcriptional Networks Driving Cell Growth and Division through Multiple Promoter-Binding Modes.\" Genes &amp; Development 33 (5\u20136): 288\u2013293.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Almathen, Faisal, Haitham Elbir, Hussain Bahbahani, Joram Mwacharo, and Olivier Hanotte. 2018. \u201cPolymorphisms in Mc1r and Asip Genes Are Associated with Coat Color Variation in the Arabian Camel.\u201d Journal of Heredity 109 (6): 700\u2013706.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ballester, Leomar Y., Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, and Rajesh R. Singh. 2016. \u201cAdvances in Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing: Target Enrichment and Sequencing Technologies.\u201d Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 16 (3): 357\u2013372.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Baranovskiy, Andrey G., Vincent N. Duong, Nigar D. Babayeva, Yinbo Zhang, Youri I. Pavlov, Karen S. Anderson, and Tahir H. Tahirov. 2018. \u201cActivity and Fidelity of Human DNA Polymerase Alpha Depend on Primer Structure.\u201d Journal of Biological Chemistry 293 (18): 6824\u20136843.<\/p>\n<p>Biswas, S., Ghosh, S., Das, S., &amp; Maitra, S. (2021). Female Reproduction: At the Crossroads of Endocrine Disruptors and Epigenetics. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 74(4), 532\u2013545. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12595-021-00403-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12595-021-00403-4<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Brezina, Paulina R., Raymond Anchan, and William G. Kearns. 2016. \u201cPreimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: What Technology Should You Use and What Are the Differences?\u201d Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 33 (7): 823\u2013832.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bultman, Scott J. 2017. \u201cInterplay Between Diet, Gut Microbiota, Epigenetic Events, and Colorectal Cancer.\" Molecular Nutrition &amp; Food Research 61 (1):1\u201312.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cutting, Garry R. 2015. \u201cCystic Fibrosis Genetics: From Molecular Understanding to Clinical Application.\u201d Nature Reviews Genetics 16 (1): 45\u201356.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">D'Alessandro, Giuseppina., and Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna. 2017. \u201cTranscription and DNA Damage: Holding Hands or Crossing Swords?\u201d Journal of Molecular Biology 429 (21): 3215\u20133229.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">De Craene, Johan-Owen, Dimitri L. Bertazzi, S\u00e9verine Bar, and Sylvie Friant. 2017. \u201cPhosphoinositides, Major Actors in Membrane Trafficking and Lipid Signaling Pathways.\u201d International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (3): 1\u201320.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Deng, Lian, and Shuhua Xu. 2018. \u201cAdaptation of Human Skin Color in Various Populations.\u201d Hereditas 155 (1): 1\u201312.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dever, Thomas E., Terri G. Kinzy, and Graham D. Pavitt. 2016. \u201cMechanism and Regulation of Protein Synthesis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.\u201d Genetics 203 (1): 65\u2013107.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Eme, Laura, Anja Spang, Jonathan Lombard, Courtney W. Stairs, and Thijs J. G. Ettema. 2017. \u201cArchaea and the Origin of Eukaryotes.\u201d Nature Reviews Microbiology 15 (12): 711\u2013723.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gomez-Carballa, Alberto, Jacobo Pardo-Seco, Stefania Brandini, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Michael D. Coble, Toni M. Diegoli, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Peopling of South America and the Trans-Andean Gene Flow of the First Settlers.\u201d Genome Research 28 (6): 767\u2013779.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gvozdenov, Zlata, Janhavi Kolhe, and Brian C. Freeman. 2019. \u201cThe Nuclear and DNA-Associated Molecular Chaperone Network.\u201d Cold Spring Harbour Perspectives in Biology 11 (10): a034009.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Harkins, Kelly M., and Anne C. Stone. 2015. \u201cAncient Pathogen Genomics: Insights into Timing and Adaptation.\u201d Journal of Human Evolution 79: 137\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jackson, Maria, Leah Marks, Gerhard H. W. May, and Joanna B. Wilson. 2018. \u201cThe Genetic Basis of Disease.\u201d Essays in Biochemistry 62 (5): 643\u2013723.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lenormand, Thomas, Jan Engelstadter, Susan E. Johnston, Erik Wijnker, and Christopher R. Haag. 2016. \u201cEvolutionary Mysteries in Meiosis.\u201d Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 1\u201314.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Levy, Shawn E., and Richard M. Myers. 2016. \u201cAdvancements in Next-Generation Sequencing.\u201d Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 17: 95\u2013115.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lindo, John, Emilia Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Shigeki Nakagome, Morten Rasmussen, Barbara Petzelt, Joycelynn Mitchell, Jerome S. Cybulski, et al. 2016. \"A Time Transect of Exomes from a Native American Population Before and After European Contact.\" Nature Communications 7: 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ncomms13175.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lu, Mengfei, Cathryn M. Lewis, and Matthew Traylor. 2017. \u201cPharmacogenetic Testing through the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Company 23andme.\u201d BMC Medical Genomics 10 (47): 1\u20138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ly, Lundi, Donovan Chan, Mahmoud Aarabi, Mylene Landry, Nathalie A. Behan, Amanda J. MacFarlane, and Jacquetta Trasler. 2017. \u201cIntergenerational Impact of Paternal Lifetime Exposures to Both Folic Acid Deficiency and Supplementation on Reproductive Outcomes and Imprinted Gene Methylation.\u201d Molecular Human Reproduction 23 (7): 461\u2013477.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ma, Wenxiu, Giancarlo Bonora, Joel B. Berletch, Xinxian Deng, William S. Noble, and Christine M. Disteche. 2018. \u201cX-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse.\u201d Methods in Molecular Biology 1861: 205\u2013219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Machiela, Mitchell J., Weiyin Zhou, Eric Karlins, Joshua N. Sampson, Neal D. Freedman, Qi Yang, Belynda Hicks, et al. 2016. \u201cFemale Chromosome X Mosaicism Is Age-Related and Preferentially Affects the Inactivated X Chromosome.\u201d Nature Communications 7: 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ncomms11843.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mahdavi, Morteza, Mohammadreza Nassiri, Mohammad M. Kooshyar, Masoume Vakili-Azghandi, Amir Avan, Ryan Sandry, Suja Pillai, Alfred K. Lam, and Vinod Gopalan. 2019. \u201cHereditary Breast Cancer; Genetic Penetrance and Current Status with BRCA.\u201d Journal of Cellular Physiology 234 (5): 5741\u20135750.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">McDade, Thomas W., Calen P. Ryan, Meaghan J. Jones, Morgan K. Hoke, Judith Borja, Gregory E. Miller, Christopher W. Kuzawa, and Michael S. Kobor. 2019. \u201cGenome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Relation to Socioeconomic Status During Development and Early Adulthood.\u201d American Journal of Physical Anthropology 169 (1): 3\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Migeon, Barbara R. 2017. \u201cChoosing the Active X: The Human Version of X Inactivation.\u201d Trends in Genetics 33 (12): 899\u2013909.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Myerowitz, Rachel. 1997. \u201cTay-Sachs Disease-Causing Mutations and Neutral Polymorphisms in the Hex A Gene.\u201d Human Mutation 9 (3): 195\u2013208.<\/p>\n<p>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2024, July 22). Endocrine Disruptors. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; United States Government. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.niehs.nih.gov\/health\/topics\/agents\/endocrine\">https:\/\/www.niehs.nih.gov\/health\/topics\/agents\/endocrine<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Onufriev, Alexey V., and Helmut Schiessel. 2019. \u201cThe Nucleosome: From Structure to Function through Physics.\u201d Current Opinion in Structural Biology 56: 119\u2013130.<\/p>\n<p>Peedicayil J. (2006). Epigenetic therapy--a new development in pharmacology. The Indian journal of medical research, 123(1), 17\u201324.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Quillen, Ellen E., Heather L. Norton, Esteban J. Parra, Frida Lona-Durazo, Khai C. Ang, Florin M. Illiescu, Laurel N. Pearson, et al. 2019. \u201cShades of Complexity: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Genetic Architecture of Human Skin.\u201d American Journal of Physical Anthropology 168 (67): 4\u201326.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Raspelli, Erica, and Roberta Fraschini. 2019. \u201cSpindle Pole Power in Health and Disease.\u201d Current Genetics 65 (4): 851\u2013855.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ravinet, M., R. Faria, R. K. Butlin, J. Galindo, N. Bierne, M. Rafajlovic, M. A. F. Noor, B. Mehlig, and A. M. Westram. 2017. \u201cInterpreting the Genomic Landscape of Speciation: A Road Map for Finding Barriers to Gene Flow.\u201d Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30 (8): 1450\u20131477.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Regev, Aviv, Sarah A. Teichmann, Eric S. Lander, Ido Amit, Christophe Benoist, Ewan Birney, Bernd Bodenmiller, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Human Cell Atlas.\u201d Elife 6e27041: 1\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554.eLife.27041.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roberts, Andrea L., Nicole Gladish, Evan Gatev, Meaghan J. Jones, Ying Chen, Julia L. MacIsaac, Shelley S. Tworoger, et al. 2018. \u201cExposure to Childhood Abuse Is Associated with Human Sperm DNA Methylation.\u201d Translational Psychiatry 8 (194): 1\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roger, Andrew J., Sergio A. Mu\u00f1oz-G\u00f3mez, and Ryoma Kamikawa. 2017. \u201cThe Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria.\u201d Current Biology 27 (21): R1177\u2013R1192. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S096098221731179X?via%3Dihub#!<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">S\u00e9gurel, Laure, and C\u00e9line Bon. 2017. \u201cOn the Evolution of Lactase Persistence in Humans.\u201d Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 18: 297\u2013319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sheth, Bhavisha P., and Vrinda S. Thaker. 2017. \u201cDNA Barcoding and Traditional Taxonomy: An Integrated Approach for Biodiversity Conservation.\u201d Genome 60 (7): 618\u2013628.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Skloot, Rebecca. 2010. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishing Group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Snedeker, Jonathan, Matthew Wooten, and Xin Chen. 2017. \u201cThe Inherent Asymmetry of DNA Replication.\u201d Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 33: 291\u2013318.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sullivan-Pyke, Chantae, and Anuja Dokras. 2018. \u201cPreimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.\u201d Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 45 (1): 113\u2013125.<\/p>\n<p>Sweeney, M. F., Hasan, N., Soto, A. M., &amp; Sonnenschein, C. (2015). Environmental endocrine disruptors: Effects on the human male reproductive system. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 16(4), 341\u2013357. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11154-016-9337-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11154-016-9337-4<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Szostak, Jack W. 2017. \u201cThe Narrow Road to the Deep Past: In Search of the Chemistry of the Origin of Life.\u201d Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 (37): 11037\u201311043.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tessema, Mathewos, Ulrich Lehmann, and Hans Kreipe. 2004. \u201cCell Cycle and No End.\u201d Virchows Archiv European Journal of Pathology 444 (4): 313\u2013323.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tishkoff, Sarah A., Floyd A. Reed, Alessia Ranciaro, Benjamin F. Voight, Courtney C. Babbitt, Jesse S. Silverman, Kweli Powell, et al. 2007. \u201cConvergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe.\u201d Nature Genetics 39 (1): 31\u201340.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Visootsak, Jeannie, and John M. Graham, Jr. 2006. \u201cKlinefelter Syndrome and Other Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies.\u201d Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1:42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1750-1172-1-42.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wolfe, George C., dir. 2017. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. HBO Films, April 22, 2017. TV Movie.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Yamamoto, Fumi-ichiro, Henrik Clausen, Thayer White, John Marken, and Sen-itiroh Hakomori. 1990. \u201cMolecular Genetic Basis of the Histo-Blood Group ABO System.\u201d Nature 345 (6272): 229\u2013233.<\/p>\n<p>Yu, X., Zhao, H., Wang, R., Chen, Y., Ouyang, X., Li, W., Sun, Y., &amp; Peng, A. (2024). Cancer epigenetics: from laboratory studies and clinical trials to precision medicine. Cell Death Discovery, 10(1), 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41420-024-01803-z<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zlotogora, Jo\u00ebl. 2003. \u201cPenetrance and Expressivity in the Molecular Age.\u201d Genetics in Medicine 5 (5): 347\u2013352.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zorina-Lichtenwalter, Katerina, Ryan N. Lichtenwalter, Dima V. Zaykin, Marc Parisien, Simon Gravel, Andrey Bortsov, and Luda Diatchenko. 2019. \u201cA Study in Scarlet: MC1R as the Main Predictor of Red Hair and Exemplar of the Flip-Flop Effect.\u201d Human Molecular Genetics 28 (12): 2093-2106.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zwart, Haeh. 2018. \u201cIn the Beginning Was the Genome: Genomics and the Bi-Textuality of Human Existence.\u201d New Bioethics 24 (1): 26\u201343.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1636\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1636\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_906\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_906\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p>Keith Chan, Ph.D., Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District and MiraCosta College<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Lily Berruyer, Lyn Loytchenko, and Sarah Cupidio<\/h6>\n<p><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\"><em>Chapter 12: Modern Homo sapiens<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Keith Chan. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Learning Objectives<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li>Identify the skeletal and behavioural traits that represent modern <em>Homo sapiens.<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Critically evaluate different types of evidence for the origin of our species in Africa and our expansion around the world.<\/li>\n<li>Understand how the human lifestyle changed when people transitioned from foraging to agriculture.<\/li>\n<li>Hypothesize how human evolutionary trends may continue into the future.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The walls of a pink limestone cave in the hillside of Jebel Irhoud jutted out of the otherwise barren landscape of the Moroccan desert (Figure 13.1). Miners had excavated the cave in the 1960s, revealing some fossils. In 2007, a re-excavation of the site became a momentous occasion for science. A fossil cranium unearthed by a team of researchers was barely visible to the untrained eye. Just the fossil\u2019s robust brows were peering out of the rock. This research team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology was the latest to explore the ancient human presence in this part of North Africa after a find by miners in 1960. Excavating near the first discovery, the researchers wanted to learn more about how <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> lived far from East Africa, where we thought our species originated.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 2500px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/image10-1.jpg\" alt=\"Rocky hillside with exposed layers. People are visible at the base.\" width=\"2500\" height=\"987\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.1: The excavation of an exposed cave at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, where hominin fossils were found in the 1960s and in 2007. Dating showed that they could represent the earliest-known modern Homo sapiens. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/homo-sapiens\/presskit.html\">View looking south of the Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) site<\/a> by Shannon McPherron, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/index.html\">MPI EVA Leipzig<\/a>, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The scientists were surprised when they analyzed the cranium, named Irhoud 10, and other fossils. Statistical comparisons with other human crania concluded that the Irhoud face shapes were typical of recent modern humans while the braincases matched ancient modern humans. Based on the findings of other scientists, the team expected these modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> fossils to be around 200,000 years old. Instead, dating revealed that the cranium had been buried for around 315,000 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Together, the modern-looking facial dimensions and the older date reshaped the interpretation of our species: modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Some key evolutionary changes from the archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (described in Chapter 12) to our species today happened 100,000 years earlier than we had thought and across the vast African continent rather than concentrated in its eastern region.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">This revelation in the study of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is just one of the latest in this continually advancing area of biological anthropology. Researchers today are still discovering amazing fossils and ingenious ways to collect data and test hypotheses about our past. Through the collective work of many scientists, we are building an overall theory of modern human origins.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Defining Modernity<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What defines modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> when compared to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>? Modern humans, like you and me, have a set of derived traits that are not seen in archaic humans or any other hominin. As with other transitions in hominin evolution, such as increasing brain size and bipedal ability, modern traits do not appear fully formed or all at once. In other words, the first modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> was not just born one day from archaic parents. The traits common to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> appeared in a <strong>mosaic<\/strong> manner: gradually and out of sync with one another. There are two areas to consider when tracking the complex evolution of modern human traits. One is the physical change in the skeleton. The other is behaviour inferred from the size and shape of the cranium and material culture evidence.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skeletal Traits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The skeleton of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is less robust than that of archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. In other words, the modern skeleton is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1406\">gracile<\/a><\/strong>, meaning that the structures are thinner and smoother. Differences related to gracility in the cranium are seen in the braincase, the face, and the mandible. There are also broad differences in the rest of the skeleton.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Cranial Traits<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 445px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29-2.png\" alt=\"A rounded skull facing a robust skull with sloping forehead.\" width=\"445\" height=\"221\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.2: Comparison between modern (left) and archaic (right) Homo sapiens skulls. Note the overall gracility of the modern skull, as well as the globular braincase. Credit: <a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Modern human and Neanderthal<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId17\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Several elements of the braincase differ between modern and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Overall, the shape is much rounder, or more <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1758\"><strong>globular<\/strong>,<\/a> on a modern skull (Lieberman, McBratney, and Krovitz 2002; Neubauer, Hublin, and Gunz 2018; Pearson 2008; Figure 13.2). You can feel the globularity of your own modern human skull. Feel the height of your forehead with the palm of your hand. Viewed from the side, the tall vertical forehead of a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> stands out when compared to the sloping archaic version. This is because the frontal lobe of the modern human brain is larger than the one in archaic humans, and the skull has to accommodate the expansion. The vertical forehead reduces a trait that is common to all other hominins: the brow ridge or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1759\">supraorbital torus<\/a><\/strong>. The parietal lobes of the brain and the matching parietal bones on either side of the skull both bulge outward more in modern humans. At the back of the skull, the archaic occipital bun is no longer present. Instead, the occipital region of the modern human cranium has a derived tall and smooth curve, again reflecting the globular brain inside.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The trend of shrinking face size across hominins reaches its extreme with our species as well. The facial bones of a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are extremely gracile compared to all other hominins (Lieberman, McBratney, and Krovitz 2002). Continuing a trend in hominin evolution, technological innovations kept reducing the importance of teeth in reproductive success (Lucas 2007). As natural selection favoured smaller and smaller teeth, the surrounding bone holding these teeth also shrank.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Related to smaller teeth, the mandible is also gracile in modern humans when compared to archaic humans and other hominins. Interestingly, our mandibles have pulled back so far from the prognathism of earlier hominins that we gained an extra structure at the most anterior point, called the <strong>mental eminence<\/strong>. You know this structure as the chin. At the skeletal level, it resembles an upside-down \u201cT\u201d at the centerline of the mandible (Pearson 2008). Looking back at archaic humans, you will see that they all lack a chin. Instead, their mandibles curve straight back without a forward point. What is the chin for and how did it develop? Flora Gr\u00f6ning and colleagues (2011) found evidence of the chin\u2019s importance by simulating physical forces on computer models of different mandible shapes. Their results showed that the chin acts as structural support to withstand strain on the otherwise gracile mandible.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Postcranial Gracility<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 368px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-5.png\" alt=\"Two complete skeletons. The left is taller with a thinner frame.\" width=\"368\" height=\"575\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.3: Anterior views of modern (left) and archaic (right) Homo sapiens skeletons. The modern human has an overall gracile appearance at this scale as well. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Modern and archaic Homo sapiens skeletons (Figure 12.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The rest of the modern human skeleton is also more gracile than its archaic counterpart. The differences are clear when comparing a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> with a cold-adapted Neanderthal (Sawyer and Maley 2005), but the trends are still present when comparing modern and archaic humans within Africa (Pearson 2000). Overall, a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> postcranial skeleton has thinner cortical bone, smoother features, and more slender shapes when compared to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Figure 13.3). Comparing whole skeletons, modern humans have longer limb proportions relative to the length and width of the torso, giving us lankier outlines.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Why is our skeleton so gracile compared to those of other hominins? Natural selection can drive the gracilization of skeletons in several ways (Lieberman 2015). A slender frame is believed to be adapted for the efficient long-distance running ability that started with <em>Homo erectus<\/em>. Furthermore, it is argued that slenderness is a genetic adaptation for cooling an active body in hotter climates, which aligns with the ample evidence that Africa was the home continent of our species.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Behavioural Modernity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Aside from physical differences in the skeleton, researchers have also uncovered evidence of behavioural changes associated with increased cultural complexity from archaic to modern humans. How did cultural complexity develop? Two investigations into this question are archaeology and the analysis of reconstructed brains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Archaeology tells us much about the behavioural complexity of past humans by interpreting the significance of material culture. In terms of advanced culture, items created with an artistic flair, or as decoration, speak of abstract thought processes (Figure 13.4). The demonstration of difficult artistic techniques and technological complexity hints at social learning and cooperation as well. According to paleoanthropologist John Shea (2011), one way to track the complexity of past behaviour through artifacts is by measuring the variety of tools found together. The more types of tools constructed with different techniques and for different purposes, the more modern the behaviour. Researchers are still working on an archaeological way to measure cultural complexity that is useful across time and place.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 221px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"A brown standing statue of a human figure with cat\u2019s head.\" width=\"221\" height=\"392\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.4: Carved ivory figure called \u201cthe Lion-Man of the Hohlenstein-Stadel.\u201d It dates to the Aurignacian culture, between 35 and 40 kya. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Loewenmensch1.jpg\">Loewenmensch1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Dagmar_Hollmann\">Dagmar Hollmann<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The interpretation of brain anatomy is another promising approach to studying the evolution of human behaviour. When looking at investigations on this topic in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains, researchers found a weak association between brain size and test-measured intelligence (Pietschnig et al. 2015). Additionally, they found no association between intelligence and biological sex. These findings mean that there are more significant factors that affect tested intelligence than just brain size. Since the sheer size of the brain is not useful for weighing intelligence within a species, paleoanthropologists are instead investigating the differences in certain brain structures. The differences in organization between modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains may reflect different cognitive priorities that account for modern human culture. As with the archaeological approach, new discoveries will refine what we know about the human brain and apply that knowledge to studying the distant past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taken together, the cognitive abilities in modern humans may have translated into an adept use of tools to enhance survival. Researchers Patrick Roberts and Brian A. Stewart (2018) call this concept the <strong>generalist-specialist niche<\/strong>: our species is an expert at living in a wide array of environments, with populations culturally specializing in their own particular surroundings. The next section tracks how far around the world these skeletal and behavioural traits have taken us.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">First Africa, Then the World<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What enabled modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> to expand its range further in 300,000 years than <em>Homo erectus<\/em> did in 1.5 million years? The key is the set of derived biological traits from the last section. It is theorized that the gracile frame and neurological anatomy allowed modern humans to survive and even flourish in the vastly different environments they encountered. Based on multiple types of evidence, the source of all of these modern humans was Africa. Instead of originating from just one location, evidence shows that modern Homo sapiens evolution occurred in a complex gene flow network across Africa, a concept called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1760\">African multiregionalism<\/a><\/strong> (Scerri et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">This section traces the origin of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and the massive expansion of our species across all of the continents (except Antarctica) by 12,000 years ago. While modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> first shared geography with archaic humans, modern humans eventually spread into lands where no human had gone before. Figure 13.5 shows the broad routes that our species took expanding around the world. I encourage you to make your own timeline with the dates in this part to see the overall trends.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-6.png\" alt=\"315 to 195 KYA. Northern to eastern coasts of Africa are shaded.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-5.png\" alt=\"195-100 KYA. Africa, southern Europe and Asia are shaded\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27-3.png\" alt=\"99 to 30 KYA. Africa, Indonesia, Australia, and southern portions of Europe and Asia are shaded.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 554px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30-2.png\" alt=\"29 to 9 KYA. Shading covers most land except Antarctica, Greenland, and some islands.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.5a-d: Four maps depicting the estimated range of modern Homo sapiens through time. The shaded area is based on geographical connections across known sites. Note the growth in the area starting in Africa and the oftentimes-coastal routes that populations followed. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Four maps depicting the estimated range of modern Homo sapiens through time<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><strong> Biology and Culture in Africa<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">We start with the ample fossil evidence supporting the theory that modern humans originated in Africa during the Middle Pleistocene, having evolved from African archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The earliest dated fossils considered to be modern actually have a mosaic of archaic and modern traits, showing the complex changes from one type to the other. Experts have various names for these transitional fossils, such as <strong><strong>Early Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong> or Early Anatomically Modern Humans<\/strong>. However they are labeled, the presence of some modern traits means that they illustrate the origin of the modern type. Three particularly informative sites with fossils of the earliest modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are Jebel Irhoud, Omo, and Herto.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 281px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"3D image of a human cranium with pronounced brow ridges.\" width=\"281\" height=\"282\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.6: Composite rendering of the Jebel Irhoud hominin based on micro-CT scans of multiple fossils from the site. The facial structure is within the modern human range, while the braincase is between the archaic and modern shapes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/homo-sapiens\/presskit.html\">A composite reconstruction of the earliest known Homo sapiens fossils from Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) based on micro computed tomographic scans<\/a> by Philipp Gunz, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/index.html\">MPI EVA Leipzig<\/a>, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Recall from the start of the chapter that the most recent finds at Jebel Irhoud are now the oldest dated fossils that exhibit some facial traits of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Besides Irhoud 10, the cranium that was dated to 315,000 years ago (Hublin et al. 2017; Richter et al. 2017), there were other fossils found in the same deposit that we now know are from the same time period. In total there are at least five individuals, representing life stages from childhood to adulthood. These fossils form an image of high variation in skeletal traits. For example, the skull named Irhoud 1 has a primitive brow ridge, while Irhoud 2 and Irhoud 10 do not (Figure 13.6). The braincases are lower than what is seen in the modern humans of today but higher than in archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The teeth also have a mix of archaic and modern traits that defy clear categorization into either group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Research separated by nearly four decades uncovered fossils and artifacts from the Kibish Formation in the Lower Omo Valley in Ethiopia. These Omo Kibish hominins were represented by braincases and fragmented postcranial bones of three individuals found kilometers apart, dating back to around 233,000 years ago (Day 1969; McDougall, Brown, and Fleagle 2005; Vidal et al. 2022). One interesting finding was the variation in braincase size between the two more-complete specimens: while the individual named Omo I had a more globular dome, Omo II had an archaic-style long and low cranium.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Also in Ethiopia, a team led by Tim White (2003) excavated numerous fossils at Herto. There were fossilized crania of two adults and a child, along with fragments of more individuals. The dates ranged between 160,000 and 154,000 years ago. The skeletal traits and stone-tool assemblage were both intermediate between the archaic and modern types. Features reminiscent of modern humans included a tall braincase and thinner zygomatic (cheek) bones than those of archaic humans (Figure 13.7). Still, some archaic traits persisted in the Herto fossils, such as the supraorbital tori. Statistical analysis by other research teams concluded that at least some cranial measurements fit just within the modern human range (McCarthy and Lucas 2014), favouring categorization with our own species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 373px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-3.jpg\" alt=\"Replica cranium showing wide brow ridges and gracile face.\" width=\"373\" height=\"373\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.7: This model of the Herto cranium showing its mosaic of archaic and modern traits. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-sapiens-idaltu-bou-vp-16-1-herto-skull-BH-045\/category\/all-fossil-hominids\/fossil-hominids\">Homo sapiens idaltu BOU-VP-16\/1 Herto Cranium<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The timeline of material culture suggests a long period of relying on similar tools before a noticeable diversification of artifacts types. Researchers label the time of stable technology shared with archaic types the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1766\"><strong>Middle Stone Age<\/strong><\/a>, while the subsequent time of diversification in material culture is called the<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1767\"> <strong>Later Stone Age<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the Middle Stone Age, the sites of Jebel Irhoud, Omo, and Herto all bore tools of the same flaked style as archaic assemblages, even though they were separated by almost 150,000 years. The consistency in technology may be evidence that behavioural modernity was not so developed. No clear signs of art dating back this far have been found either. Other hypotheses not related to behavioural modernity could explain these observations. The tool set may have been suitable for thriving in Africa without further innovation. Maybe works of art from that time were made with media that deteriorated or perhaps such art was removed by later humans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evidence of what <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> did in Africa from the end of the Middle Stone Age to the Later Stone Age is concentrated in South African cave sites that reveal the complexity of human behaviour at the time. For example, Blombos Cave, located along the present shore of the Cape of Africa facing the Indian Ocean, is notable for having a wide variety of artifacts. The material culture shows that toolmaking and artistry were more complex than previously thought for the Middle Stone Age. In a layer dated to 100,000 years ago, researchers found two intact ochre-processing kits made of abalone shells and grinding stones (Henshilwood et al. 2011). Marine snail shell beads from 75,000 years ago were also excavated (Figure 13.8; d\u2019Errico et al. 2005). Together, the evidence shows that the Middle Stone Age occupation at Blombos Cave incorporated resources from a variety of local environments into their culture, from caves (ochre), open land (animal bones and fat), and the sea (abalone and snail shells). This complexity shows a deep knowledge of the region\u2019s resources and their use\u2014not just for survival but also for symbolic purposes.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 563px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Multiple views of shells with holes bored through them.\" width=\"563\" height=\"482\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.8: Examples of the perforated shell beads found in Blombos Cave, South Africa: (a) view of carved hole seen from the inside; (b) arrows indicate worn surfaces due to repetitive contact with other objects, such as with other beads or a connecting string; (c) traces of ochre; and (d) four shell beads showing a consistent pattern of perforation. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:BBC-shell-beads.jpg\">BBC-shell-beads<\/a> by Chenshilwood (Chris Henshilbood and Francesco d\u2019Errico) at <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/\">English Wikipedia<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">On the eastern coast of South Africa, Border Cave shows new African cultural developments at the start of the Later Stone Age. Paola Villa and colleagues (2012) identified several changes in technology around 43,000 years ago. Stone-tool production transitioned from a slower process to one that was faster and made many <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1777\">microliths<\/a><\/strong>, small and precise stone tools. Changes in decorations were also found across the Later Stone Age transition. Beads were made from a new resource: fragments of ostrich eggs shaped into circular forms resembling present-day breakfast cereal O\u2019s (d\u2019Errico et al. 2012). These beads show a higher level of altering one\u2019s own surroundings and a move from the natural to the abstract in terms of design.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Expansion into the Middle East and Asia<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> lived across Africa, some members eventually left the continent. These pioneers could have used two connections to the Middle East or West Asia. From North Africa, they could have crossed the Sinai Peninsula and moved north to the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1769\"><strong>Levant<\/strong><\/a>, or eastern Mediterranean. Finds in that region show an early modern human presence. Other finds support the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1770\">Southern Dispersal model<\/a><\/strong>, with a crossing from East Africa to the southern Arabian Peninsula through the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb. It is tempting to think of one momentous event in which people stepped off Africa and into the Middle East, never to look back. In reality, there were likely multiple waves of movement producing gene flow back and forth across these regions as the overall range pushed east. The expanding modern human population could have thrived by using resources along the southern coast of the Arabian Peninsula to South Asia, with side routes moving north along rivers. The maximum range of the species then grew across Asia.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Modern <\/em>Homo sapiens<em> in the Middle East<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Geographically, the Middle East is the ideal place for the African modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> population to inhabit upon expanding out of their home continent. In the Eastern Mediterranean coast of the Levant, there is a wealth of skeletal and material culture linked to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Recent discoveries from Saudi Arabia further add to our view of human life just beyond Africa.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The Caves of Mount Carmel in present-day Israel have preserved skeletal remains and artifacts of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, the first-known group living outside Africa. The skeletal presence at Misliya Cave is represented by just part of the left upper jaw of one individual, but it is notable for being dated to a very early time, between 194,000 and 177,000 years ago (Hershkovitz et al. 2018). Later, from 120,000 to 90,000 years ago, fossils of multiple individuals across life stages were found in the caves of Es-Skhul and Qafzeh (Shea and Bar-Yosef 2005). The skeletons had many modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> traits, such as globular crania and more gracile postcranial bones when compared to Neanderthals. Still, there were some archaic traits. For example, the adult male Skhul V also possessed what researchers Daniel Lieberman, Osbjorn Pearson, and Kenneth Mowbray (2000) called marked or clear occipital bunning. Also, compared to later modern humans, the Mount Carmel people were more robust. Skhul V had a particularly impressive brow ridge that was short in height but sharply jutted forward above the eyes (Figure 13.9). The high level of preservation is due to the intentional burial of some of these people. Besides skeletal material, there are signs of artistic or symbolic behaviour. For example, the adult male Skhul V had a boar\u2019s jaw on his chest. Similarly, Qafzeh 11, a juvenile with healed cranial trauma, had an impressive deer antler rack placed over his torso (Figure 13.10; Coqueugniot et al. 2014). Perforated seashells coloured with <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1806\"><strong>ochre<\/strong><\/a>, mineral-based pigment, were also found in Qafzeh (Bar-Yosef Mayer, Vandermeersch, and Bar-Yosef 2009).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 484px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Side view of a skull replica with a globular braincase.\" width=\"484\" height=\"484\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.9: This Skhul V cranium model shows the sharp browridges. The contour of a marked occipital bun is barely visible from this angle. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-sapiens-skull-skhul-5-BH-032\">Homo sapiens Skull Skhul 5<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 484px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Human skeleton in a stony matrix. Ribs are visible below the antlers.\" width=\"484\" height=\"312\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.10 This cast of the Qafzeh 11 burial shows the antler\u2019s placement over the upper torso. The forearm bones appear to overlap the antler. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Moulage_de_la_s%C3%A9pulture_de_l'individu_%22Qafzeh_11%22_(avec_ramure_de_cervid%C3%A9),_homme_de_N%C3%A9andertal.jpg\">Moulage de la s\u00e9pulture de l'individu \"Qafzeh 11\" (avec ramure de cervid\u00e9), homme de N\u00e9andertal<\/a> (Collections du Mus\u00e9um national d'histoire naturelle de Paris, France) by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Eunostos\">Eunostos<\/a> has been modified (cropped and colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">One remaining question is, what happened to the modern humans of the Levant after 90,000 years ago? Another site attributed to our species did not appear in the region until 47,000 years ago. Competition with Neanderthals may have accounted for the disappearance of modern human occupation since the Neanderthal presence in the Levant lasted longer than the dates of the early modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. John Shea and Ofer Bar-Yosef (2005) hypothesized that the Mount Carmel modern humans were an initial expansion from Africa that failed. Perhaps they could not succeed due to competition with the Neanderthals who had been there longer and had both cultural and biological adaptations to that environment.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Modern <\/em>Homo sapiens<em> of China<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A long history of paleoanthropology in China has found ample evidence of modern human presence. Four notable sites are the caves at Fuyan, Liujiang, Tianyuan, and Zhoukoudian. In the distant past, these caves would have been at least seasonal shelters that unintentionally preserved evidence of human presence for modern researchers to discover.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">At Fuyan Cave in Southern China, paleoanthropologists found 47 adult teeth associated with cave formations dated to between 120,000 and 80,000 years ago (Liu et al. 2015). It is currently the oldest-known modern human site in China, though other researchers question the validity of the date range (Michel et al. 2016). The teeth have the small size and gracile features of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> dentition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The fossil Liujiang (or Liukiang) hominin (67,000 years ago) has derived traits that classified it as a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, though primitive archaic traits were also present. In the skull, which was found nearly complete, the Liujiang hominin had a taller forehead than archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> but also had an enlarged occipital region (Figure 13.11; Brown 1999; Wu et al. 2008). Other parts of the skeleton also had a mix of modern and archaic traits: for example, the femur fragments suggested a slender length but with thick bone walls (Woo 1959).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 486px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-1-2.jpg\" alt=\"A human skull with very slight brow ridges and an extremely globular braincase.\" width=\"486\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.11: The Liujiang cranium shows the tall forehead and overall gracile appearance typical of modern Homo sapiens. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Liujiang_cave_skull-a._Homo_Sapiens_68,000_Years_Old.jpg\">Liujiang cave skull-a. Homo Sapiens 68,000 Years Old<\/a> (Taken at the David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins, <a href=\"https:\/\/naturalhistory.si.edu\/visit\">Smithsonian Natural History Museum<\/a>) by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/14405058@N08\">Ryan Somma<\/a> has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another Chinese site to describe here is the one that has been studied the longest. In the Zhoukoudian Cave system (Figure 13.12), where <em>Homo erectus<\/em> and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> have also been found, there were three crania of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. These crania, which date to between 34,000 and 10,000 years ago, were all more globular than those of archaic humans but still lower and longer than those of later modern humans (Brown 1999; Harvati 2009). When compared to one another, the crania showed significant differences from one another. Comparison of cranial measurements to other populations past and present found no connection with modern East Asians, again showing that human variation was very different from what we see today.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-1.jpg\" alt=\"A cave opening amongst a dry wooded region.\" width=\"610\" height=\"458\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.12: The entrance to the Upper Cave of the Zhoukoudian complex, where crania of three ancient modern humans were found. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Zhoukoudian_Upper_Cave.jpg\">Zhoukoudian Upper Cave<\/a> by Mutt is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Crossing to Australia<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Expansion of the first modern human Asians, still following the coast, eventually entered an area that researchers call <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1772\">Sunda<\/a><\/strong> before continuing on to modern Australia. Sunda was a landmass made up of the modern-day Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, and Borneo. Lowered sea levels connected these places with land bridges, making them easier to traverse. Proceeding past Sunda meant navigating <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1773\">Wallacea<\/a><\/strong>, the archipelago that includes the Indonesian islands east of Borneo. In the distant past, there were many <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_864\">megafauna<\/a><\/strong>, large animals that migrating humans would have used for food and materials (such as utilizing animals\u2019 hides and bones). Further southeast was another landmass called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1774\">Sahul<\/a><\/strong>, which included New Guinea and Australia as one contiguous continent. Based on fossil evidence, this land had never seen hominins or any other primates before modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> arrived. Sites along this path offer clues about how our species handled the new environment to live successfully as foragers.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"A cranium showing a diagonal sloping forehead.\" width=\"380\" height=\"252\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.13: Replica of the Kow Swamp 1 cranium. The shape of the braincase could be due to artificial cranial modification. A competing hypothesis is that it reflects the primitive shape of Homo erectus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Kow_Swamp1-Homo_sapiens.jpg\">Kow Swamp1-Homo sapiens<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/14405058@N08\">Ryan Somma<\/a> from Occoquan, USA, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a> has been modified (background cleaned and colour modified) and is available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The skeletal remains at Lake Mungo, land traditionally owned by Mutthi Mutthi, Ngiampaa, and Paakantji peoples, are the oldest known in the continent. The now-dry lake was one of a series located along the southern coast of Australia in New South Wales, far from where the first people entered from the north (Barbetti and Allen 1972; Bowler et al. 1970). Two individuals dating to around 40,000 years ago show signs of artistic and symbolic behaviour, including intentional burial. The bones of Lake Mungo 1 (LM1), an adult female, were crushed repeatedly, coloured with red ochre, and cremated (Bowler et al. 1970). Lake Mungo 3 (LM3), a tall, older male with a gracile cranium but robust postcranial bones, had his fingers interlocked over his pelvic region (Brown 2000).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Kow Swamp, within traditional Yorta Yorta land also in southern Australia, contained human crania that looked distinctly different from the ones at Lake Mungo (Durband 2014; Thorne and Macumber 1972). The crania, dated between 9,000 and 20,000 years ago, had extremely robust brow ridges and thick bone walls, but these were paired with globular features on the braincase (Figure 13.13).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While no fossil humans have been found at the Madjedbebe rock shelter in the North Territory of Australia, more than 10,000 artifacts found there show both behavioural modernity and variability (Clarkson et al. 2017). They include a diverse array of stone tools and different shades of ochre for rock art, including mica-based reflective pigment (similar to glitter). These impressive artifacts are as far back as 56,000 years old, providing the date for the earliest-known presence of humans in Australia.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>From the Levant to Europe<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The first modern human expansion into Europe occurred after other members of our species settled in East Asia and Australia. As the evidence from the Levant suggests, modern human movement to Europe may have been hampered by the presence of Neanderthals.\u00a0<span style=\"margin: 0px;padding: 0px\">It is suggested that another obstacle was the colder climate, which was incompatible with the biology of modern\u00a0<em>Homo sapiens<\/em>\u00a0from Africa, as they were adapted to high temperatures and ultraviolet radiation.<\/span>\u00a0Still, by 40,000 years ago, modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> had a detectable presence. This time was also the start of the Later Stone Age or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1775\">Upper Paleolithic<\/a><\/strong>, when there was an expansion in cultural complexity. There is a wealth of evidence from this region due to a Western bias in research, the proximity of these findings to Western scientific institutions, and the desire of Western scientists to explore their own past.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 323px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-3.jpg\" alt=\"Robust cranium with a gradually sloping forehead.\" width=\"323\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.14: This side view of the Oase 2 cranium shows the reduced brow ridges but also occipital bunning that is a sign that modern Homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/fossils\/oase-2\">Oase 2<\/a> by James Di Loreto &amp; Donald H. Hurlbert, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: Human Evolution Evidence, Human Fossils] has been modified (sharpened) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In Romania, the site of Pe\u0219tera cu Oase (Cave of Bones) had the oldest-known remains of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> in Europe, dated to around 40,000 years ago (Trinkaus et al. 2003a). Among the bones and teeth of many animals were the fragmented cranium of one person and the mandible of another (the two bones did not fit each other). Both bones have modern human traits similar to the fossils from the Middle East, but they also had Neanderthal traits. Oase 1, the mandible, had a mental eminence but also extremely large molars (Trinkaus et al. 2003b). This mandible has yielded DNA that surprisingly is equally similar to DNA from present-day Europeans and Asians (Fu et al. 2015). This means that Oase 1 was not the direct ancestor of modern Europeans. The Oase 2 cranium has the derived traits of reduced brow ridges along with archaic wide zygomatic cheekbones and an occipital bun (Figure 13.14; Rougier et al. 2007).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dating to around 26,000 years ago, P\u0159edmost\u00ed near P\u0159erov in the Czech Republic was a site where people buried over 30 individuals along with many artifacts. Eighteen individuals were found in one mass burial area, a few covered by the scapulae of woolly mammoths (Germonpr\u00e9, L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Sablin 2012). The P\u0159edmost\u00ed crania were more globular than those of archaic humans but tended to be longer and lower than in later modern humans (Figure 13.15; Velem\u00ednsk\u00e1 et al. 2008). The height of the face was in line with modern residents of Central Europe. There was also skeletal evidence of dog domestication, such as the presence of dog skulls with shorter snouts than in wild wolves (Germonpr\u00e9, L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Sablin et al. 2012). In total, P\u0159edmost\u00ed could have been a settlement dependent on mammoths for subsistence and the artificial selection of early domesticated dogs.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 423px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25-3.png\" alt=\"Black-and-white photograph of a human skull with labeled cranial landmarks.\" width=\"423\" height=\"389\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.15: This illustration is based upon one of the surviving photographic negatives since the original fossil was lost in World War II. The modern human chin is prominent, as is an archaic occipital bun. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD_9.png\">P\u0159edmost\u00ed 9<\/a> by J. Matiegka (1862\u20131941) has been modified (sharpened) and is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The sequence of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> technological change in the Later Stone Age has been thoroughly dated and labeled by researchers working in Europe. Among them, the Gravettian tradition of 33,000 years to 21,000 years ago is associated with most of the known curvy female figurines, often assumed to be \u201cVenus\u201d figures. Hunting technology also advanced in this time with the first known boomerang, <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1792\"><strong>atlatl<\/strong><\/a> (spear thrower), and archery. The Magdalenian tradition spread from 17,000 to 12,000 years ago. This culture further expanded on fine bone tool work, including barbed spearheads and fishhooks (Figure 13.16).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 511px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Long, thin spear tips. Many have barbs, others are smooth.\" width=\"511\" height=\"494\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.16: This drawing from 1891 shows an array of Magdalenian-style barbed points found in the burial of a reindeer hunter. They were carved from antler. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:La_station_quaternaire_de_Raymonden_(...)Hardy_Michel_bpt6k5567846s_(2).jpg\">La station quaternaire de Raymonden (...)Hardy Michel bpt6k5567846s (2)<\/a> by M. F\u00e9auxis, original by Michel Hardy (1891), is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Among the many European sites dating to the Later Stone Age, the famous cave art sites deserve mention. Chauvet-Pont-d'Arc Cave in southern France dates to separate Aurignacian occupations 31,000 years ago and 26,000 years ago. Over a hundred art pieces representing 13 animal species are preserved, from commonly depicted deer and horses to rarer rhinos and owls. Another French cave with art is Lascaux, which is several thousand years younger at 17,000 years ago in the Magdalenian period. At this site, there are over 6,000 painted figures on the walls and ceiling (Figure 13.17). Scaffolding and lighting must have been used to make the paintings on the walls and ceiling deep in the cave. Overall, visiting Lascaux as a contemporary must have been an awesome experience: trekking deeper in the cave lit only by torches giving glimpses of animals all around as mysterious sounds echoed through the galleries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 605px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Charcoal painting of a bull seen from the side.\" width=\"605\" height=\"454\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.17: Photograph of just one surface with cave art at Lascaux Cave. The most prominent piece here is the Second Bull, found in a chamber called the Hall of Bulls. Smaller cattle and horses are also visible. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/en\/documents\/108435\">Lascaux cave (document 108435) Prehitoric Sites and Decorated Caves of the V\u00e9z\u00e8re Valley (France)<\/a> by Francesco Bandarin, <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/\">\u00a9 UNESCO<\/a>, has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/en\/licenses\/6\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Special Topic: Cannibalism and Culture - Mortuary Practices in Modern Homo sapiens<\/h2>\n<p>Within a 2017 publication in the <em>Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em>, Saladi\u00e9 and Rodr\u00edguez-Hidalgo bring light to traces of early cannibalism in western Eurasia, arguing that context-specific cannibalistic practices were present throughout the Pleistocene and increased notably from the end of the Upper Palaeolithic and onward (Saladi\u00e9 &amp; Rodriguez-Hidalgo, 2017). While early hominins and Neandertals are recognized in this research, the authors highlight the presence of these mortuary practices in a cluster of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> sites. More recent research uncovers similar findings that back these claims as well, where human bones in Herto Ethiopia, Maszycka Cave Poland, and Gough\u2019s Cave in the United Kingdom show anthropogenic defleshing and other modifications which have been interpreted as cannibalism (Pobiner, Et al. 2023). These findings suggest that cannibalistic behaviours formed a recurring aspect of modern human behaviour in certain ecological and cultural contexts.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_817\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-817\" style=\"width: 378px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\" wp-image-817\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/d_-_briana_pobiner_-_figure_6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"378\" height=\"369\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-817\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.18: Close-up photos of three fossil animal specimens from the same area and time horizon as the fossil hominin tibia studied by the research team. These fossils show similar cut marks to those found on the hominin tibia studied. The photos show (a) an antelope mandible, (b) an antelope radius (lower front leg bone) and (c) a large mammal scapula (shoulder blade). Credit: <em data-start=\"617\" data-end=\"635\">23-199D Figure 6<\/em> by Smithsonian\u2019s National Museum of Natural History, from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago\">Humans\u2019 Evolutionary Relatives Butchered One Another 1.45 Million Years Ago<\/a>,\" \u00a9 Smithsonian Institution, used with permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A significant example comes from the Neolithic levels of Fontbr\u00e9gua Cave in southeastern France, where Paola Villa and colleagues compared clusters of human bones with the remains of wild and domestic animals from the same sediments. The study found that human bodies were butchered, processed, and most likely eaten in a way that parallels animal carcass treatment, including the placement and timing of cut marks, dismemberment sequences, and perimortem fractures to open marrow cavities (Villa, Et al. 1986). As the assemblage comes from a primary depositional context with pristine preservation and careful excavation, the authors suggest that cannibalism is the only satisfactory explanation for the pattern of cut marks and breakage seen on the human bones.<\/p>\n<p>More recent work has furthered this hypothesis for Late Upper Palaeolithic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, especially in Magdalenian contexts. In a 2023 study, researchers combined archeological and genetic evidence from fifty-nine Magdalenian sites, concluding that this specific culture shows an unusually high frequency of cannibalistic cases compared to earlier and later hominin groups; so much so that they identify \u201cprimary burial and cannibalism\u201d as the two main mortuary expressions (Marsh &amp; Bello, 2023). Additionally, new analyses from Maszycka Cave in Poland have described cut and broken human bones in patterns consistent with human consumption, reinforcing this cannibalism hypothesis (Marginedas &amp; Saladi\u00e9, 2025). Together, these studies suggest that for some Magdalenian groups, mortuary cannibalism was a habitual way of disposing of the dead, not just a one-off crisis response. At the same time, researchers emphasize that not every modified skeleton indicates blatant consumption of the dead and that ritual or symbolic perspectives must also be considered. Previously noted in chapter 12, Ullrich\u2019s survey of European mortuary practices presents frequent manipulations of corpses from the Palaeolithic through the Hallstatt period. Said manipulations include cut marks, dismemberment, skull fracturing, and marrow extraction (Ullrich, 2005, p. 258), which Ullrich interprets as cannibalistic rites embedded in cult ceremonies rather than everyday subsistence. In the author\u2019s view, some Palaeolithic groups may have believed that consuming members of their community allowed them to take on the strengths,<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_819\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-819\" style=\"width: 265px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-819\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/a_-_briana_pobiner_-_figure_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"265\" height=\"379\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-819\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.19: View of the hominin tibia and magnified area that shows cut marks. Scale = 4 cm. Credit: 23-199A Figure 1 by Jennifer Clark, Smithsonian Institution, from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago\">Humans\u2019 Evolutionary Relatives Butchered One Another 1.45 Million Years Ago<\/a>,\" \u00a9Smithsonian Institution, used with permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>abilities, or even mental aspects of their dead member; the act of cannibalism may have functioned as a form of appropriating physical and mental powers rather than simply obtaining calories. With that, Neolithic assemblages show how careful taphonomic work can distinguish cuts linked to interpersonal violence from those associated with systemic butchery (Marginedas &amp; Saladi\u00e9, 2025). The findings seek to highlight that some <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> populations combined ritual, mortuary, and nutritional motives when processing human remains.<\/p>\n<p>These past and contemporary findings are significant for future anthropology students as they shed light on biological anthropology methodology and interpretation. Archaeologists are able to distinguish between occasions when humans were handled like any other carcass and times when they were handled in more symbolic ways thanks to factors like cut mark orientation, the timing of bone breakage, and direct comparison with animal remains. Readers interested in exploring this topic further should investigate the context-specific motivations for cannibalism, like nutritional stress, warfare, funerary sites, or ritual power appropriation.<\/p>\n<p>Similar archeological techniques have been used to explore behaviours of cannibalism among Indigenous Huron-Wendat populations in 1651 Canada, where human bones exhibit cutmarks, perimortem fractures, and thermal modifications (Spence &amp; Jackson, 2014). These shared taphonomic signatures across continents reveal recurring practices under ecological stress, bridging prehistoric Europe to North American contexts. Engaging with such analytical techniques opens up new ways that archeologists and anthropologists can investigate the variability in human behaviour, from nutritional crises to mortuary rituals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Peopling of the Americas<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">By 25,000 years ago, our species was the only member of <em>Homo<\/em> left on Earth. Gone were the Neanderthals, Denisovans, <em>Homo naledi,<\/em> and <em>Homo floresiensis<\/em>. The range of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> kept expanding eastward into\u2014using the name given to this area by Europeans much later\u2014the Western Hemisphere. This section will address what we know about the peopling of the Americas, from the first entry to these continents to the rapid spread of Indigenous Americans across its varied environments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While evidence points to an ancient land bridge called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1778\"><strong>Beringia<\/strong><\/a> that allowed people to cross from what is now northeastern Siberia into modern-day Alaska, what people did to cross this land bridge is still being investigated. For most of the 20th century, the accepted theory was the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1779\"><strong>Ice-Free Corridor model<\/strong><\/a>. It stated that northeast Asians (East Asians and Siberians) first expanded across Beringia inland through a passage between glaciers that opened into the western Great Plains of the United States, just east of the Rocky Mountains, around 13,000 years ago (Swisher et al. 2013). While life up north in the cold environment would have been harsh, migrating birds and an emerging forest might have provided sustenance as generations expanded through this land (Potter et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">However, in recent decades, researchers have accumulated evidence against the Ice-Free Corridor model. Archaeologist K. R. Fladmark (1979) brought the alternate <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1780\"><strong>Coastal Route model<\/strong><\/a> into the archaeological spotlight; researcher Jon M. Erlandson has been at the forefront of compiling support for this theory (Erlandson et al. 2015). The new focus is the southern edge of the land bridge instead of its center: About 16,000 years ago, members of our species expanded along the coastline from northeast Asia, east through Beringia, and south down the Pacific Coast of North America while the inland was still sealed off by ice. The coast would have been free of ice at least part of the year, and many resources would have been found there, such as fish (e.g., salmon), mammals (e.g., whales, seals, and otters), and plants (e.g., seaweed).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>South through the Americas<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">When the first modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> reached the Western Hemisphere, the spread through the Americas was rapid. Multiple migration waves crossed from North to South America (Posth et al. 2018). Our species took advantage of the lack of hominin competition and the bountiful resources both along the coasts and inland. The Americas had their own wide array of megafauna, which included woolly mammoths (Figure 13.20), mastodons, camels, horses, ground sloths, giant tortoises, and\u2014a favourite of researchers\u2014a two-meter-tall beaver. The reason we cannot see these amazing animals today may be that resources gained from these fauna were crucial to the survival for people over 12,000 years ago (Araujo et al. 2017). Several sites are notable for what they add to our understanding of the distant past in the Americas, including interactions with megafauna and other elements of the environment.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 242px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"A mammoth model with long curving tusks.\" width=\"242\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.20: Life-size reconstruction of a woolly mammoth at the Page Museum, part of the La Brea Tar Pits complex in Los Angeles, California. Outside of Africa, megafauna such as this went extinct around the time that humans entered their range. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Woolly Mammoth<\/a> (at <a href=\"https:\/\/tarpits.org\/\">La Brea Tar Pits &amp; Museum<\/a>) by Keith Chan is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A 2019 discovery may allow researchers to improve theories about the peopling of the Americas. In White Sands National Park, New Mexico, 60 human footprints have been astonishingly dated to around 22,000 years ago (Bennett et al. 2021). This date and location do not match either the Ice-Free Corridor or Coastal Route models. Researchers are now working to verify the find and adjust previous models to account for the new evidence. This groundbreaking find is sparking new theories; it is another example of the fast pace of research performed on our past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Monte Verde is a landmark site that shows that the human population had expanded down the whole vertical stretch of the Americas to Chile by 14,600 years ago. The site has been excavated by archaeologist Tom D. Dillehay and his team (2015). The remains of nine distinct edible species of seaweed at the site shows familiarity with coastal resources and relates to the Coastal Route model by showing a connection between the inland people and the sea.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 254px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21-4.png\" alt=\"A long stone point with small chips around the edge.\" width=\"254\" height=\"362\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.21: The Clovis point has a distinctive structure. It has a wide tip, and its base has two small projections. This example was carved from chert and found in north-central Ohio, dated to around 11,000 years ago. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/object\/chndm_15.2012.25\">Clovis Point<\/a> (15.2012.25) by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [Department of Anthropology; Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Named after the town in New Mexico, the Clovis stone-tool style is the first example of a widespread culture across much of North America, between 13,400 and 12,700 years ago (Miller, Holliday, and Bright 2013). Clovis points were fluted with two small projections, one on each end of the base, facing away from the head (Figure 13.21). The stone points found at this site match those found as far as the Canadian border and northern Mexico, and from the west coast to the east coast of the United States. Fourteen Clovis sites also contained the remains of mammoths or mastodons, suggesting that hunting megafauna with these points was an important part of life for the Clovis people. After the spread of the Clovis style, it diversified into several regional styles, keeping some of the Clovis form but also developing their own unique touches.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Big Picture: The Assimilation Hypothesis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">How do researchers make sense of all of these modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> discoveries that cover over 300,000 years of time and stretch across every continent except Antarctica? How was modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> related to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1782\">Assimilation hypothesis<\/a><\/strong> proposes that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> evolved in Africa first and expanded out but also interbred with the archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> they encountered outside Africa (Figure 13.22). This hypothesis is powerful since it explains why Africa has the oldest modern human fossils, why early modern humans found in Europe and Asia bear a resemblance to the regional archaics, and why traces of archaic DNA can be found in our genomes today (Dannemann and Racimo 2018; Reich et al. 2010; Reich et al. 2011; Slatkin and Racimo 2016; Smith et al. 2017; Wall and Yoshihara Caldeira Brandt 2016).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 443px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28-2.png\" alt=\"African Homo erectus expands and gives rise to archaics and modern Homo sapiens groups.\" width=\"443\" height=\"471\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.22: This diagram shows archaic humans, having evolved from Homo erectus, expanded from Africa and established the Neanderthal and Denisovan groups. In Africa, archaic humans evolved modern traits and expanded from the continent as well, interbreeding with two archaic groups across Europe and Asia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Assimilation Model (Figure 12.23)l<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Keith Chan and Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While researchers have produced a model that satisfies the data, there are still a lot of questions for paleoanthropologists to answer regarding our origins. What were the patterns of migration in each part of the world? Why did the archaic humans go extinct? In what ways did archaic and modern humans interact? The definitive explanation of how our species started and what our ancestors did is still out there to be found. You are now in a great place to welcome the next discovery about our distant past\u2014maybe you\u2019ll even contribute to our understanding as well.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Chain Reaction of Agriculture<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While it may be hard to imagine today, for most of our species\u2019 existence we were nomadic: moving through the landscape without a singular home. Instead of a refrigerator or pantry stocked with food, we procured nutrition and other resources as needed based on what was available in the environment. This section gives an overview of how the foraging lifestyle enabled the expansion of our species and how the invention of a new way of life caused a chain reaction of cultural change.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Foraging Tradition<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">There are a variety of possible <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1783\">subsistence strategies<\/a><\/strong>, or methods of finding sustenance and resources. To understand our species is to understand the subsistence strategy of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1114\">foraging<\/a><\/strong>, or the search for resources in the environment. While most (but not all) humans today live in cultures that practice <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1784\">agriculture<\/a> <\/strong>(whereby we greatly shape the environment to mass produce what we need), we have spent far more time as nomadic foragers than as settled agriculturalists. As such, it has been suggested that our traits have evolved to be primarily geared toward foraging. For instance, our efficient bipedalism allows persistence-hunting across long distances as well as movement from resource to resource.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">How does human foraging, also known as hunting and gathering, work? Anthropologists have used all four fields to answer this question (see Ember n.d.). Typically, people formed <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1785\"><strong>bands<\/strong><\/a>, or kin-based groups of around 50 people or less (rarely over 100). A band\u2019s organization would be <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1786\"><strong>e<\/strong><strong>galitarian<\/strong><\/a>, with a flexible hierarchy based on an individual\u2019s age, level of experience, and relationship with others. Everyone would have a general knowledge of the skills assigned to their gender roles, rather than specializing in different occupations. A band would be able to move from place to place in the environment, using knowledge of the area to forage (Figure 13.23). In varied environments\u2014from savannas to tropical forests, deserts, coasts, and the Arctic circle\u2014people found sustenance needed for survival.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 565px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22.jpg\" alt=\"A hunter holding a bow is crouched among dry grass.\" width=\"565\" height=\"377\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.23: A present-day San man in Namibia demonstrates hunting using archery. Anthropologists study the San today to learn about the persistence of foraging as a viable lifestyle, while noting how these cultures have changed over time and how they interact with other groups. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/charlesfred\/2129551464\">San hunter w\u0131th bow and arrow<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/charlesfred\/\">CharlesFred<\/a> has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Humans made extensive use of the foraging subsistence strategy, but this lifestyle did have limitations. The ease of foraging depended on the richness of the environment. Due to the lack of storage, resources had to be dependably found when needed. While a bountiful environment would require just a few hours of foraging a day and could lead to a focus on one location, the level and duration of labor increased greatly in poor or unreliable environments. Labor was also needed to process the acquired resources, which contributed to the foragers\u2019 daily schedule (Crittenden and Schnorr 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The adaptations to foraging found in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> may explain why our species became so successful both within Africa and in the rapid expansion around the world. Overcoming the limitations, each generation at the edge of our species\u2019s range would have found it beneficial to expand a little further, keeping contact with other bands but moving into unexplored territory where resources were more plentiful. The cumulative effect would have been the spread of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> across continents and hemispheres.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Why Agriculture?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">After hundreds of thousands of years of foraging, some groups of people around 12,000 years ago started to practice agriculture. This transition, called the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1787\"><strong>Neolithic Revolution<\/strong>,<\/a> occurred at the start of the <strong>Holocene<\/strong> epoch. While the reasons for this global change are still being investigated, two likely co-occurring causes are a growing human population and natural global climate change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Overcrowding could have affected the success of foraging in the environment, leading to the development of a more productive subsistence strategy (Cohen 1977). Foraging works best with low population densities since each band needs a lot of space to support itself. If too many people occupy the same environment, they deplete the area faster. The high population could exceed the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1788\">carrying capacity<\/a><\/strong>, or number of people a location can reliably support. Reaching carrying capacity on a global level due to growing population and limited areas of expansion would have been an increasingly pressing issue after the expansion through the major continents by 14,600 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A changing global climate immediately preceded the transition to agriculture, so researchers have also explored a connection between the two events. Since the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1789\">Last Glacial Maximum<\/a><\/strong> of 23,000 years ago, the Earth slowly warmed. Then, from 13,000 to 11,700 years ago, the temperature in most of the Northern Hemisphere dropped suddenly in a phenomenon called the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1790\"><strong>Younger Dryas<\/strong>.<\/a> Glaciers returned in Europe, Asia, and North America. In Mesopotamia, which includes the Levant, the climate changed from warm and humid to cool and dry. The change would have occurred over decades, disrupting the usual nomadic patterns and subsistence of foragers around the world. The disruption to foragers due to the temperature shift could have been a factor in spurring a transition to agriculture. Researchers Gregory K. Dow and colleagues (2009) believe that foraging bands would have clustered in the new resource-rich places where people started to direct their labor to farming the limited area. After the Younger Dryas ended, people expanded out of the clusters with their agricultural knowledge (Figure 13.24).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 570px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-6.png\" alt=\"Map shows that agriculture was invented in at least six parts of the world.\" width=\"570\" height=\"267\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.24: The map shows the areas where agriculture was independently invented around the world and where they spread. Blue arrows show the spread of agriculture from these zones to other regions. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture.svg\">Centres of origin and spread of agriculture<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Joe_Roe\">Joe Roe<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The double threat of the limitation of human continental expansion and the sudden global climate change may have placed bands in peril as more populations outpaced their environment\u2019s carrying capacity. Not only had a growing population may have led to increased competition with other bands, but environments worldwide had shifted to create more uncertainty. As such, it has been proposed that as people in different areas around the world faced this unpredictable situation, they became the independent inventors of agriculture.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agriculture around the World<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Due to global changes to the human experience starting from 12,000 years ago, it has been suggested that cultures with no knowledge of each other turned toward intensely farming their local resources (see Figure 13.24).\u00a0 It is proposed that the first farmers engaged in artificial selection of their domesticates to enhance useful traits over generations. The switch to agriculture took time and effort with no guarantee of success and constant challenges (e.g. fires, droughts, diseases, and pests). The regions with the most widespread impact in the face of these obstacles became the primary centers of agriculture (Figure 13.25; Fuller 2010):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Mesopotamia: The Fertile Crescent from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers through the Levant was where bands started to domesticate plants and animals around 12,000 years ago. The connection between the development of agriculture and the Younger Dryas was especially strong here. Farmed crops included wheat, barley, peas, and lentils. This was also where cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats were domesticated.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">South and East Asia: Multiple regions across this land had varieties of rice, millet, and soybeans by 10,000 years ago. Pigs were farmed with no connection to Mesopotamia. Chickens were also originally from this region, bred for fighting first and food second.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">New Guinea: Agriculture started here 10,000 years ago. Bananas, sugarcane, and taro were native to this island. Sweet potatoes were brought back from voyages to South America around the year C.E. 1000. No known animal farming occurred here.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Mesoamerica: Agriculture from Central Mexico to northern South America also occurred from 10,000 years ago; it was also only plant based. Maize was a crop bred from teosinte grass, which has become one of the global staples. Beans, squash, and avocados were also grown in this region.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">The Andes: Starting around 8,000 years ago, local domesticated plants started with squash but later included potatoes, tomatoes, beans, and quinoa. Maize was brought down from Mesoamerica. The main farm animals were llamas, alpacas, and guinea pigs.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Sub-Saharan Africa: This region went through a change 5,000 years ago called the Bantu expansion. The Bantu agriculturalists were established in West Central Africa and then expanded south and east. Native varieties of rice, yams, millet, and sorghum were grown across this area. Cattle were also domesticated here.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Eastern North America: This region was the last major independent agriculture center, from 4,000 years ago. Squash and sunflower are the produce from this region that are most known today, though sumpweed and pitseed goosefoot were also farmed. Hunting was still the main source of animal products.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure style=\"width: 482px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Farmers plow a flooded field. Each plow is pulled by two oxen. \" width=\"482\" height=\"320\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.25: Rice farmers in the present day using draft cattle to prepare their field. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ricephotos\/7554483250\">Plowing muddy field using cattle<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ricephotos\/\">IRRI Photos<\/a> (International Rice Research Institute) has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">By 5,000 years ago, our species was well within the Neolithic Revolution. Agriculturalists spread to neighboring parts of the world with their domesticates, further expanding the use of this subsistence strategy. From this point, the human species changed from being primarily foragers to primarily agriculturalists with skilled control of their environments. The planet changed from mostly unaffected by human presence to being greatly transformed by humans. The revolution took millennia, but it was a true revolution as our species\u2019 lifestyle was dramatically reshaped.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural Effects of Agriculture<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The worldwide adoption of agriculture altered the course of human culture and history forever. The core change in human culture due to agriculture is the move toward not moving: rather than live a nomadic lifestyle, farmers had to remain in one area to tend to their crops and livestock. The term for living bound to a certain location is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1793\">sedentarism<\/a><\/strong>. This led to new aspects of life that were uncommon among foragers: the construction of permanent shelters and agricultural infrastructure, such as fields and irrigation, plus the development of storage technology, such as pottery, to preserve extra resources in case of future instability.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 359px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Multistory buildings surrounding a greek-style plaza.\" width=\"359\" height=\"270\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.26: View of downtown San Diego taken by the author at a shopping complex during a break from jury duty. Here, people live amongst structures that facilitate commerce, government, tourism, and art. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Downtown San Diego (October 13, 2016; Figure 12.28)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Keith Chan is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The high productivity of successful agriculture sparked further changes (Smith 2009). It is argued that since successful agriculture produced a much greater amount of food and other resources per unit of land compared to foraging, the population growth rate skyrocketed. The surplus of a bountiful harvest also provided insurance for harder times, reducing the risk of famine and bringing change to society as well. With a few farming households producing enough food to feed many others, people could start specializing in roles such as craftspeople, traders, religious figures, and artists, spurring innovation in these areas as people could now devote time and effort toward specific skills. These interdependent people would settle an area together for convenience, and over time, the growth of these settlements led to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1794\">urbanization<\/a><\/strong>, the founding of cities that became the foci of human interaction (Figure 13.26).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The formation of cities led to new issues that sparked the growth of further specializations, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1795\">institutions<\/a><\/strong>. These are cultural constructs that exist beyond the individual and have wide control over a population. Leadership of these cities became hierarchical with different levels of rank and control. The stratification of society increased social inequality between those with more or less power over others. Under leadership, people built impressive <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1796\">monumental architecture<\/a><\/strong>, such as pyramids and palaces, that embodied the wealth and power of these early cities. Alliances could unite cities, forming the earliest states. In several regions of the world, state organization expanded into empires, wide-ranging political entities that covered a variety of cultures.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Urbanization brought new challenges as well. The concentration of sedentary peoples was ideal for infectious diseases to thrive since they could jump from person to person and even from livestock to person (Armelagos, Brown, and Turner 2005). While successful agriculture provided a large surplus of food to thwart famine, the food produced offered less diverse food sources than foragers\u2019 diets (Cohen and Armelagos 1984; Cohen and Crane-Kramer 2007). This shift in nutrition caused other diseases to flourish among those who adopted farming, such as dental cavities and malocclusion (the misalignment of teeth caused by soft, agricultural diets). The need to extract \u201cwisdom teeth\u201d or third molars seen in agricultural cultures today stems from this misalignment between the environment our ancestors adapted to and our lifestyles today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As the new disease trends show, the adoption of agriculture and the ensuing cultural changes were not entirely positive. It is also important to note that this is not an absolutely linear progression of human culture from simple to complex. In many cases, empires have collapsed and, in some cases, cities dispersed to low-density bands that rejected institutions. However, a global trend has emerged since the adoption of agriculture, wherein population and social inequality have increased, leading to the massive and influential nation-states of today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The rise of states in Europe has a direct impact on many of this book\u2019s topics. Science started as a European cultural practice by the upper class that became a standardized way to study the world. Education became an institution to provide a standardized path toward producing and gaining knowledge. The scientific study of human diversity, embroiled in the race concept that still haunts us today, was connected to the European slave trade and colonialism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Also starting in Europe, the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century turned cities into centers of mass manufacturing and spurred the rapid development of inventions (Figure 13.27). In the technologically interconnected world of today, human society has reached a new level of complexity with <strong>globalization<\/strong>. In this system, goods are mass-produced and consumed in different parts of the world, weakening the reliance on local farms and factories. The imbalanced relationship between consumers and producers of goods further increases economic inequality.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 465px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-3.jpg\" alt=\"A yellow farm vehicle driving into crops in a field.\" width=\"465\" height=\"310\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.27: This combine harvester can collect and process grain at a massive scale. Our food now commonly comes from enormous farms located around the world. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Combine_CR9060.jpeg\">Combine CR9060<\/a> by Hertzsprung is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As states based on agriculture and industry keep exerting influence on humanity today, there are people, like the Hadzabe of Tanzania, who continue to live a lifestyle centered on foraging. Due to the overwhelming force that agricultural societies exert, foragers today have been marginalized to live in the least habitable parts of the world\u2014the areas that are not conducive to farming, such as tropical rainforests, deserts, and the Arctic (Headland et al. 1989). Foragers can no longer live in the abundant environments that humans would have enjoyed before the Neolithic Revolution. Interactions with agriculturalists are typically imbalanced, with trade and other exchanges heavily favouring the larger group. One of anthropology\u2019s important roles today is to intelligently and humanely manage equitable interactions between people of different backgrounds and levels of influence.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Indigenous Land Management<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Insight into the lives of past modern humans has evolved as researchers revise previous theories and establish new connections with Indigenous knowledge holders.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The outdated view of foraging held that people lived off of the land without leaving an impact on the environment. Accompanying this idea was anthropologist Marshall Sahlins\u2019s (1968) proposal that foragers were the \u201coriginal affluent society\u201d since they were meeting basic needs and achieving satisfaction with less work hours than agriculturalists and city-dwellers. This view countered an earlier idea that foragers were always on the brink of starvation. Sahlins\u2019s theory took hold in the public eye as an attractive counterpoint to our busy contemporary lives in which we strive to meet our endless wants.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A fruitful type of study involving researchers collaborating with Indigenous experts has found that foragers did not just live off the land with minimal effort nor were they barely surviving in unchanging environments. Instead, they shaped the landscape to their needs using labor and strategies that were more subtle than what European colonizers and subsequent researchers were used to seeing. Research from two regions shows the latest developments in understanding Indigenous land management.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In British Columbia, Canada, the bridging of scientific and Indigenous perspectives has shown that the forests of the region are not untouched wilderness but, rather, have been crafted by Indigenous peoples thousands of years ago. Forest gardens adjacent to archaeological sites show higher plant diversity than unmanaged places even after 150 years (Armstrong et al. 2021). On the coast, 3,500-year-old archaeological sites are evidence of constructed clam gardens, according to Indigenous experts (Lepofsky et al. 2015). Another project, in consultation with Elders of the T\u2019exelc (William Lakes First Nation) in British Columbia, introduced researchers to explanations of how forests were managed before the practice was disrupted by European colonialism (Copes-Gerbitz et al. 2021). Careful management of controlled fires reduced the density of the forest to favour plants such as raspberries and allow easier movement through the landscape.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Similarly, the study of landscapes in Australia, in consultation with Aboriginal Australians today, shows that areas previously considered wilderness by scientists were actually the result of controlling fauna and fires. The presence of grasslands with adjacent forests were purposely constructed to attract kangaroos for hunting (Gammage 2008). People also managed other animal and insect life, from emus to caterpillars. In Tasmania, a shift from productive grassland to wildfire-prone rainforest occurred after Aboriginal Australian land management was replaced by British colonial rule (Fletcher, Hall, and Alexander 2021). The site of Budj Bim of the Gunditjmara people has archaeological features of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1689_1798\">aquaculture<\/a><\/strong>, or the farming of fish, that date back 6,600 years (McNiven et al. 2012; McNiven et al. 2015). These examples show that Indigenous knowledge of how to manipulate the environment may be invaluable at the state level, such as by creating an Aboriginal ranger program to guide modern land management.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Future of Humanity<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A common question stemming from understanding human evolution is: What will the genetic and biological traits of our species be hundreds of thousands of years in the future? When faced with this question, people tend to think of directional selection. Maybe our braincases will be even larger, resembling the large-headed and small-bodied aliens of science fiction (Figure 13.28). Or, our hands could be specialized for interacting with our touch-based technology with less risk of repetitive injury. These ideas do not stand up to scrutiny. Since natural selection is based on adaptations that increase reproductive success, any directional change must be due to a higher rate of producing successful offspring compared to other alleles. Larger brains and more agile fingers would be convenient to possess, but they do not translate into an increase in the underlying allele frequencies.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 571px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-4.png\" alt=\"One human has typical features; the other has a tall braincase.\" width=\"571\" height=\"279\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.28: Will we evolve toward even more globular brains? Actually, this trend is not likely to continue for our species. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Hypothetical image of future human evolution (Figure 12.30)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientists are hesitant to professionally speculate on the unknowable, and we will never know what is in store for our species one thousand or one million years from now, but there are two trends in human evolution that may carry on into the future: increased genetic variation and a reduction in regional differences.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rather than a directional change, genetic variation in our species could expand. Our technology can protect us from extreme environments and pathogens, even if our biological traits are not tuned to handle these stressors. The rapid pace of technological advancement means that biological adaptations will become less and less relevant to reproductive success, so nonbeneficial genetic traits will be more likely to remain in the gene pool. Biological anthropologist Jay T. Stock (2008) views environmental stress as needing to defeat two layers of protection before affecting our genetics. The first layer is our cultural adaptations. Our technology and knowledge can reduce pressure on one\u2019s genotype to be \u201cjust right\u201d to pass to the next generation. The second defense is our flexible physiology, such as our acclimatory responses. Only stressors not handled by these powerful responses would then cause natural selection on our alleles. These shields are already substantial, and cultural adaptations will only keep increasing in strength.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The increasing ability to travel far from one\u2019s home region means that there will be a mixing of genetic variation on a global level in the future of our species. In recent centuries, gene flow of people around the world has increased, creating admixture in populations that had been separated for tens of thousands of years. For skin colour, this means that populations all around the world could exhibit the whole range of skin colours, rather than the current pattern of decreasing melanin pigment farther from the equator. The same trend of intermixing would apply to all other traits, such as blood types. While our genetics will become more varied, the variation will be more intermixed instead of regionally isolated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Our distant descendants will not likely be dextrous ultraintellectuals; more likely, they will be a highly variable and mobile species supported by novel cultural adaptations that make up for any inherited biological limitations. Technology may even enable the editing of DNA directly, changing these trends. With the uncertainty of our future, these are just the best-educated guesses for now. Our future is open and will be shaped little by little by the environment, our actions, and the actions of our descendants.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summary<\/span><\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Modern<em> Homo sapiens<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">315,000 years ago to present<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Starting in Africa, then expanding around the world<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Cro-Magnon individuals, discovered 1868 in Dordogne, France. Otzi the Ice Man, discovered 1991 in the Alps between Austria and Italy. Kennewick man, discovered 1996 in Washington state.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">1400 cc average<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Extremely small with short cusps.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">An extremely globular brain case and gracile features throughout the cranium. The mandibular symphysis forms a chin at the anterior-most point.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Gracile skeleton adapted for efficient bipedal locomotion at the expense of the muscular strength of most other large primates.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Extremely extensive and varied culture with many spoken and written languages. Art is ubiquitous. Technology is broad in complexity and impact on the environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The only living hominin. Chimpanzees and bonobos are the closest living relatives.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is the species that took the hominin lifestyle the furthest to become the only living member of that lineage. The largest factor that allowed us to persist while other hominins went extinct was likely our advanced ability to culturally adapt to a wide variety of environments. Our species, with its skeletal and behavioural traits, was well-suited to be generalist-specialists who successfully foraged across most of the world\u2019s environments. The biological basis of this adaptation was our reorganized brain that facilitated innovation in cultural adaptations and intelligence for leveraging our social ties and finding ways to acquire resources from the environment. As the brain\u2019s ability increased, it shaped the skull by reducing the evolutionary pressure to have large teeth and robust cranial bones to produce the modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> face.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Our ability to be generalist-specialists is seen in the geographical range that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> covered in 300,000 years. In Africa, our species formed from multiregional gene flow that loosely connected archaic humans across the continent. People then expanded out to the rest of the continental Eurasia and even further to the Americas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">For most of our species\u2019s existence, foraging was the general subsistence strategy within which people specialized to culturally adapt to their local environment. With omnivorousness and mobility, people found ways to extract and process resources, shaping the environment in return. When resource uncertainty hit the species, people around the world focused on agriculture to have a firmer control of sustenance. The new strategy shifted human history toward exponential growth and innovation, leading to our high dependence on cultural adaptations today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While a cohesive image of our species has formed in recent years, there is still much to learn about our past. The work of many driven researchers shows that there are amazing new discoveries made all the time that refine our knowledge of human evolution. Technological innovations such as DNA analysis enable scientists to approach lingering questions from new angles. The answers we get allow us to ask even more insightful questions that will lead us to the next revelation. Like the pink limestone strata at Jebel Irhoud, previous effort has taken us so far and you are now ready to see what the next layer of discovery holds.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What are the skeletal and behavioural traits that define modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>? What are the evolutionary explanations for its presence?<\/li>\n<li>What are some creative ways that researchers have learned about the past by studying fossils and artifacts?<\/li>\n<li>How do the discoveries mentioned in \u201cFirst Africa, Then the World\u201d fit the Assimilation model?<\/li>\n<li>What is foraging? What adaptations do we have for this subsistence strategy? Could you train to be a skilled forager?<\/li>\n<li>What are aspects of your life that come from dependence on agriculture and its cultural effects? Where did the ingredients of your favourite foods originate from?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>African multiregionalism<\/strong>: The idea that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> evolved as a complex web of small regional populations with sporadic gene flow among them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agriculture<\/strong>: The mass production of resources through farming and domestication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Aquaculture<\/strong>: The farming of fish using techniques such as trapping, channels, and artificial ponds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Assimilation <\/strong><strong>hypothesis<\/strong>: Current theory of modern human origins stating that the species evolved first in Africa and interbred with archaic humans of Europe and Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Atlatl<\/strong>: A handheld spear thrower that increased the force of thrown projectiles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Band<\/strong>: A small group of people living together as foragers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Beringia<\/strong>: Ancient landmass that connected Siberia and Alaska. The ancestors of Indigenous Americans would have crossed this area to reach the Americas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carrying capacity<\/strong>: The amount of organisms that an environment can reliably support.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Coastal Route model<\/strong>: Theory that the first Paleoindians crossed to the Americas by following the southern coast of Beringia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Early Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><strong>, Early Anatomically Modern Human<\/strong>: Terms used to refer to transitional fossils between archaic and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> that have a mosaic of traits. Humans like ourselves, who mostly lack archaic traits, are referred to as Late Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and simply Anatomically Modern Humans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Egalitarian<\/strong>: Human organization without strict ranks. Foraging societies tend to be more egalitarian than those based on other subsistence strategies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraging<\/strong>: Lifestyle consisting of frequent movement through the landscape and acquiring resources with minimal storage capacity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Generalist-specialist niche<\/strong>: The ability to survive in a variety of environments by developing local expertise. Evolution toward this niche may have been what allowed modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> to expand past the geographical range of other human species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globalization<\/strong>: A recent increase in the interconnectedness and interdependence of people that is facilitated with long-distance networks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globular<\/strong>: Having a rounded appearance. Increased globularity of the braincase is a trait of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gracile<\/strong>: Having a smooth and slender quality; the opposite of robust.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Holocene<\/strong>: The epoch of the Cenozoic Era starting around 12,000 years ago and lasting arguably through the present.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ice-Free Corridor model<\/strong>: Theory that the first Native Americans crossed to the Americas through a passage between glaciers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Institutions<\/strong>: Long-lasting and influential cultural constructs. Examples include government, organized religion, academia, and the economy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Last Glacial Maximum<\/strong>: The time 23,000 years ago when the most recent ice age was the most intense.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Later Stone Age<\/strong>: Time period following the Middle Stone Age with a diversification in tool types, starting around 50,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Levant<\/strong>: The eastern coast of the Mediterranean. The site of early modern human expansion from Africa and later one of the centers of agriculture.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Megafauna<\/strong>: Large ancient animals that may have been hunted to extinction by people around the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mental eminence<\/strong>: The chin on the mandible of modern <em>H. sapiens<\/em>. One of the defining traits of our species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microlith<\/strong>: Small stone tool found in the Later Stone Age; also called a bladelet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Middle Stone Age<\/strong>: Time period known for Mousterian lithics that connects African archaic to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monumental architecture<\/strong>: Large and labor-intensive constructions that signify the power of the elite in a sedentary society. A common type is the pyramid, a raised crafted structure topped with a point or platform.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mosaic<\/strong>: Composed from a mix or composite of traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neolithic Revolution<\/strong>: Time of rapid change to human cultures due to the invention of agriculture, starting around 12,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ochre<\/strong>: Iron-based mineral pigment that can be a variety of yellows, reds, and browns. Used by modern human cultures worldwide since at least 80,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sahul<\/strong>: Ancient landmass connecting New Guinea and Australia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sedentarism<\/strong>: Lifestyle based on having a stable home area; the opposite of nomadism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Southern Dispersal model<\/strong>: Theory that modern <em>H. sapiens<\/em> expanded from East Africa by crossing the Red Sea and following the coast east across Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Subsistence strategy<\/strong>: The method an organism uses to find nourishment and other resources.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sunda<\/strong>: Ancient Asian landmass that incorporated modern Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Supraorbital torus<\/strong>: The bony brow ridge across the top of the eye orbits on many hominin crania.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Upper Paleolithic<\/strong>: Time period considered synonymous with the Later Stone Age.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Urbanization<\/strong>: The increase of population density as people settled together in cities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Wallacea<\/strong>: Archipelago southeast of Sunda with different biodiversity than Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Younger Dryas<\/strong>: The rapid change in global climate\u2014notably a cooling of the Northern Hemisphere\u201413,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Websites<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>First-person virtual tour of Lascaux cave with annotated cave art: Minist\u00e8re de la Culture and Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Arch\u00e9ologie Nationale. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/archeologie.culture.fr\/lascaux\/en\/visit-cave\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Visit the cave<\/a>\u201d Lascaux website.<\/p>\n<p>Online anthropology magazine articles related to paleoanthropology and human evolution: SAPIENS. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sapies.org\/category\/evolution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evolution<\/a>.\u201d <em>SAPIENS<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<p>Various presentations of information about hominin evolution: Smithsonian Institution. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">What does it mean to be human?<\/a>\u201d <em>Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<p>Magazine-style articles on archaeology and paleoanthropology: ThoughtCo. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thoughtco.com\/archaeology-4133504\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Archaeology<\/a>.\u201d ThoughtCo. Website.<\/p>\n<p>Database of comparisons across hominins and primates: University of California, San Diego. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/carta.anthropogeny.org\/moca\/domains\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MOCA Domains<\/a>.\u201d <em>Center for Academic Research &amp; Training in Anthropogeny<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Books<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Engaging book that covers human-made changes to the environment with industrialization and globalization: Kolbert, Elizabeth. 2014. <em>The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History<\/em>. New York: Bloomsbury.<\/p>\n<p>Overview of what human life was like among the environmental shifts of the Ice Age: Woodward, Jamie. 2014. <em>The Ice Age: A Very Short Introduction<\/em>. Oxford: OUP Press.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Recent review paper about the current state of paleoanthropology research: Stringer, C. 2016. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2015.0237\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Origin and Evolution of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/a>.\u201d <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B<\/em> 371 (1698).<\/p>\n<p>Overview of the history of American paleoanthropology and the many debates that have occurred over the years: Trinkaus, E. 2018. \u201cOne Hundred Years of Paleoanthropology: An American Perspective.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 165 (4): 638\u2013651.<\/p>\n<p>Amazing magazine article that synthesizes hominin evolution and why it is important to study this subject: Wheelwright, Jeff. 2015. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/discovermagazine.com\/2015\/may\/16-days-of-dysevolution\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Days of Dysevolution<\/a>.\u201d <em>Discover<\/em> 36 (4): 33\u201339.<\/p>\n<p>Fascinating research on \u00d6tzi, a mummy from 5,000 years ago: Wierer, Ursula, Simona Arrighi, Stefano Bertola, G\u00fcnther Kaufmann, Benno Baumgarten, Annaluisa Pedrotti, Patrizia Pernter, and Jacques Pelegrin. 2018. \u201cThe Iceman\u2019s Lithic Toolkit: Raw Material, Technology, Typology and Use.\u201d <em>PLOS One<\/em> 13 (6): e0198292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0198292.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Documentaries<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>PBS NOVA series covering the expansion of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and interbreeding with archaic humans: Brown, Nicholas, dir. 2015. <em>First Peoples<\/em>. Edmonton: Wall to Wall Television. Amazon Prime Video.<\/p>\n<p>PBS NOVA special featuring the footprints found in White Sands National Park: Falk, Bella, dir. 2016. <em>Ice Age Footprints<\/em>. Boston: Windfall Films. https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/video\/ice-age-footprints\/.<\/p>\n<p>PBS NOVA special about how modern humans evolved adaptations to different environments. Shows how present-day people live around the world: Thompson, Niobe, dir. 2016. <em>Great Human Odyssey<\/em>. Edmonton: Clearwater Documentary. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/evolution\/great-human-odyssey.html\">https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/evolution\/great-human-odyssey.html<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">References<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Araujo, Bernardo B. A., Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos, Matheus S. Lima-Ribeiro, Jos\u00e9 Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho, and Fernando A. S. Fernandez. 2017. \u201cBigger Kill Than Chill: The Uneven Roles of Humans and Climate on Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 431: 216\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Armelagos, George J., Peter J. Brown, and Bethany Turner. 2005. \u201cEvolutionary, Historical, and Political Economic Perspectives on Health and Disease.\u201d <em>Social Science &amp; Medicine<\/em> 61 (4): 755\u2013765.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Armstrong, C. G., J. E. D. Miller, A. C. McAlvay, P. M. Ritchie, and D. Lepofsky. 2021. \u201cHistorical Indigenous Land-Use Explains Plant Functional Trait Diversity. <em>Ecology and Society<\/em> 26 (2): 6.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bar-Yosef Mayer, Daniella E., Bernard Vandermeersch, and Ofer Bar-Yosef. 2009. \u201cShells and Ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: Indications for Modern Behavior.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 56 (3): 307\u2013314.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Barbetti, M., and H. Allen. 1972. \u201cPrehistoric Man at Lake Mungo, Australia, by 32,000 Years Bp.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 240 (5375): 46\u201348.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bennett, M. R., D. Bustos, J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, T. M. Urban, V. T. Holliday, Sally C. Reynolds, et al. (2021). \u201cEvidence of Humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 373 (6562): 1528\u20131531.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bowler, J. M., Rhys Jones, Harry Allen, and A. G. Thorne. 1970. \u201cPleistocene Human Remains from Australia: A Living Site and Human Cremation from Lake Mungo, Western New South Wales.\u201d <em>World Archaeology<\/em> 2 (1): 39\u201360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brown, Peter. 1999. \u201cThe First Modern East Asians? Another Look at Upper Cave 101, Liujiang and Minatogawa 1.\u201d In <em>Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Origins of the Japanese<\/em>, edited by K. Omoto, 105\u2013131. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brown, Peter. 2000. \u201cAustralian Pleistocene Variation and the Sex of Lake Mungo 3.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 38 (5): 743\u2013749.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Clarkson, Chris, Zenobia Jacobs, Ben Marwick, Richard Fullagar, Lynley Wallis, Mike Smith, Richard G. Roberts, et al. 2017. \u201cHuman Occupation of Northern Australia by 65,000 Years Ago.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 547 (7663): 306\u2013310.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan. 1977. <em>The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture.<\/em> New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan, and George J. Armelagos, eds. 1984.<em> Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture<\/em>. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan, and Gillian M. M. Crane-Kramer, eds. 2007.<em> Ancient Health: Skeletal Indicators of Agricultural and Economic Intensification<\/em>. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Copes-Gerbitz, K., S. Hagerman, and L. Daniels. 2021. \u201cSituating Indigenous Knowledge for Resilience in Fire-Dependent Social-Ecological Systems.\u201d <em>Ecology and Society<\/em> 26(4): 25. https:\/\/www.ecologyandsociety.org\/vol26\/iss4\/art25\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Coqueugniot, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne, Olivier Dutour, Baruch Arensburg, Henri Duday, Bernard Vandermeersch, and Anne-Marie Tillier. 2014. \u201cEarliest Cranio-Encephalic Trauma from the Levantine Middle Palaeolithic: 3-D Reappraisal of the Qafzeh 11 Skull, Consequences of Pediatric Brain Damage on Individual Life Condition and Social Care.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em> 9 (7): e102822.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Crittenden, Alyssa N., and Stephanie L. Schnorr. 2017. \u201cCurrent Views on Hunter\u2010Gatherer Nutrition and the Evolution of the Human Diet.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 162 (S63): 84\u2013109.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">d\u2019Errico, Francesco, Lucinda Backwell, Paola Villa, Ilaria Degano, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Marion K. Bamford, Thomas F. G. Higham, Maria Perla Colombini, and Peter B. Beaumont. 2012. \u201cEarly Evidence of San Material Culture Represented by Organic Artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 109 (33): 13214\u201313219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">d\u2019Errico, Francesco, Christopher Henshilwood, Marian Vanhaeren, and Karen Van Niekerk. 2005. \u201cNassarius Kraussianus Shell Beads from Blombos Cave: Evidence for Symbolic Behaviour in the Middle Stone Age.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 48 (1): 3\u201324.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dannemann, Michael, and Fernando Racimo. 2018. \u201cSomething Old, Something Borrowed: Admixture and Adaptation in Human Evolution.\u201d <em>Current Opinion in Genetics &amp; Development<\/em> 53: 1\u20138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Day, M. H. 1969. \u201cOmo Human Skeletal Remains.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 222: 1135\u20131138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dillehay, Tom D., Carlos Ocampo, Jos\u00e9 Saavedra, Andre Oliveira Sawakuchi, Rodrigo M. Vega, Mario Pino, Michael B. Collins, et al. 2015. \u201cNew Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em> 10 (11): e0141923. doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0141923.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dow, Gregory K., Clyde G. Reed, and Nancy Olewiler. 2009. \u201cClimate Reversals and the Transition to Agriculture.\u201d <em>Journal of Economic Growth<\/em> 14 (1): 27\u201353.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Durband, Arthur C. 2014. \u201cBrief Communication: Artificial Cranial Modification in Kow Swamp and Cohuna.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 155 (1): 173\u2013178.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ember, Carol R. N.d. \u201cHunter-Gatherers.\u201d <em>Explaining Human Culture. Human Relations Area Files<\/em>. Accessed March 4, 2023. <a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/hraf.yale.edu\/ehc\/summaries\/hunter-gatherers\">https:\/\/hraf.yale.edu\/ehc\/summaries\/hunter-gatherers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Erlandson, Jon M., Todd J. Braje, Kristina M. Gill, and Michael H. Graham. 2015. \u201cEcology of the Kelp Highway: Did Marine Resources Facilitate Human Dispersal from Northeast Asia to the Americas?\u201d <em>The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology<\/em> 10 (3): 392\u2013411.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fladmark, K. R. 1979. \u201cRoutes: Alternate Migration Corridors for Early Man in North America.\u201d <em>American Antiquity<\/em> 44 (1): 55\u201369.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fletcher, M. S., T. Hall, and A. N. Alexandra. 2021. \u201cThe Loss of an Indigenous Constructed Landscape Following British Invasion of Australia: An Insight into the Deep Human Imprint on the Australian Landscape.\u201d <em>Ambio<\/em> 50(1): 138\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fu, Qiaomei, Mateja Hajdinjak, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Silviu Constantin, Swapan Mallick, Pontus Skoglund, Nick Patterson, et al. 2015. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from Romania with a Recent Neanderthal Ancestor.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 524 (7564): 216\u2013219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fuller, Dorian Q. 2010. \u201cAn Emerging Paradigm Shift in the Origins of Agriculture.\u201d <em>General Anthropology<\/em> 17 (2): 1, 8\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gammage, B. 2008. \u201cPlain Facts: Tasmania under Aboriginal Management.\u201d <em>Landscape Research<\/em> 33 (2): 241\u2013254.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Germonpr\u00e9, Mietje, Martina L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Mikhail V. Sablin. 2012. \u201cPalaeolithic Dog Skulls at the Gravettian P\u0159edmost\u00ed Site, the Czech Republic.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 39 (1): 184\u2013202.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gr\u00f6ning, Flora, Jia Liu, Michael J. Fagan, and Paul O\u2019Higgins. 2011. \u201cWhy Do Humans Have Chins? Testing the Mechanical Significance of Modern Human Symphyseal Morphology with Finite Element Analysis.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 144 (4): 593\u2013606.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Harvati, Katerina. 2009. \u201cInto Eurasia: A Geometric Morphometric Reassessment of the Upper Cave (Zhoukoudian) Specimens.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 57 (6): 751\u2013762.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Headland, Thomas N., Lawrence A. Reid, M. G. Bicchieri, Charles A. Bishop, Robert Blust, Nicholas E. Flanders, Peter M. Gardner, Karl L. Hutterer, Arkadiusz Marciniak, and Robert F. Schroeder. 1989. \u201cHunter-Gatherers and Their Neighbors from Prehistory to the Present.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 30 (1): 43\u201366.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Henshilwood, Christopher S., Francesco d\u2019Errico, Karen L. van Niekerk, Yvan Coquinot, Zenobia Jacobs, Stein-Erik Lauritzen, Michel Menu, and Renata Garc\u00eda-Moreno. 2011. \u201cA 100,000-Year-Old Ochre-Processing Workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 334 (6053): 219\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hershkovitz, Israel, Gerhard W. Weber, Rolf Quam, Mathieu Duval, Rainer Gr\u00fcn, Leslie Kinsley, Avner Ayalon, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Earliest Modern Humans Outside Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 359 (6374): 456\u2013459.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Abdelouahed Ben-Ncer, Shara E. Bailey, Sarah E. Freidline, Simon Neubauer, Matthew M. Skinner, Inga Bergmann, et al. 2017. \u201cNew Fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the Pan-African Origin of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 546 (7657): 289\u2013292.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lepofsky, D., N. F. Smith, N. Cardinal, J. Harper, M. Morris, M., Gitla (Elroy White), Randy Bouchard, et al. 2015. \u201cAncient Shellfish Mariculture on the Northwest Coast of North America.\u201d <em>American Antiquity<\/em> 80 (2): 236\u2013259.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E. 2015. \u201cHuman Locomotion and Heat Loss: An Evolutionary Perspective.\u201d <em>Comprehensive Physiology<\/em> 5 (1): 99\u2013117.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E., Brandeis M. McBratney, and Gail Krovitz. 2002. \u201cThe Evolution and Development of Cranial Form in <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 99 (3): 1134\u20131139.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E., Osbjorn M. Pearson, and Kenneth M. Mowbray. 2000. \u201cBasicranial Influence on Overall Cranial Shape.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 38 (2): 291\u2013315.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Liu, Wu, Mar\u00eda Martin\u00f3n-Torres, Yan-jun Cai, Song Xing, Hao-wen Tong, Shu-wen Pei, Mark Jan Sier, Xiao-hong Wu, R. Lawrence Edwards, and Hai Cheng. 2015. \u201cThe Earliest Unequivocally Modern Humans in Southern China.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 526 (7575): 696-699.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lucas, Peter W. 2007. \u201cThe Evolution of the Hominin Diet from a Dental Functional Perspective.\u201d In <em>Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable<\/em>, edited by Peter S. Ungar, 31\u201338 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Marsh, W. A. &amp; Bello, S. (2023). Cannibalism and burial in the late Upper Palaeolithic: Combining archaeological and genetic evidence. <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em>, 319, 108309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quascirev.2023.108309<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McCarthy, Robert C., and Lynn Lucas. 2014. \u201cA Morphometric Reassessment of Bou-Vp-16\/1 from Herto, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 74: 114\u2013117.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McDougall, Ian, Francis H. Brown, and John G. Fleagle. 2005. \u201cStratigraphic Placement and Age of Modern Humans from Kibish, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 433 (7027): 733\u2013736.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McNiven, I. J., J. Crouch, T. Richards, N. Dolby, and G. Jacobsen. 2012. \u201cDating Aboriginal Stone-Walled Fishtraps at Lake Condah, Southeast Australia.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 39 (2): 268\u2013286.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McNiven, I., J. Crouch, T. Richards, K. Sniderman, N. Dolby, and G. Mirring. 2015. \u201cPhased Redevelopment of an Ancient Gunditjmara Fish Trap over the Past 800 Years: Muldoons Trap Complex, Lake Condah, Southwestern Victoria.\u201d <em>Australian Archaeology<\/em> 81 (1): 44\u201358.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Michel, V\u00e9ronique, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Valladas, Guanjun Shen, Wei Wang, Jian-xin Zhao, Chuan-Chou Shen, Patricia Valensi, and Christopher J. Bae. 2016. \u201cThe Earliest Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> in China?\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 101: 101\u2013104.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Miller, D. Shane, Vance T. Holliday, and Jordon Bright. 2013. \u201cClovis across the Continent.\u201d In <em>Paleoamerican Odyssey<\/em>, edited by Kelly E. Graf, Caroline V. Ketron, and Michael R. Waters, 207\u2013220. College Station: Texas A&amp;M University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Neubauer, Simon, Jean-Jacques Hublin, and Philipp Gunz. 2018. \u201cThe Evolution of Modern Human Brain Shape.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 4 (1): eaao5961. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aao5961.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pearson, Osbjorn M. 2000. \u201cPostcranial Remains and the Origin of Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 9: 229\u2013247.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pearson, Osbjorn M. 2008. \u201cStatistical and Biological Definitions of \u2018Anatomically Modern\u2019 Humans: Suggestions for a Unified Approach to Modern Morphology.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em> 17 (1): 38\u201348.<\/p>\n<p>Pobiner, B., Pante, M. &amp; Keevil, T. (2023). Early Pleistocene cut marked hominin fossil from Koobi Fora, Kenya. <em>Sci Rep,<\/em> 13, 9896. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-35702-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-35702-7<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pietschnig, Jakob, Lars Penke, Jelte M. Wicherts, Michael Zeiler, and Martin Voracek. 2015. \u201cMeta-Analysis of Associations between Human Brain Volume and Intelligence Differences: How Strong Are They and What Do They Mean?\u201d <em>Neuroscience &amp; Biobehavioral Reviews<\/em> 57: 411\u2013432.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Posth, Cosimo, Nathan Nakatsuka, Iosif Lazaridis, Pontus Skoglund, Swapan Mallick, Thiseas C. Lamnidis, Nadin Rohland, et al. 2018. \u201cReconstructing the Deep Population History of Central and South America.\u201d <em>Cell<\/em> 175 (5): 1185\u20131197.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Potter, Ben A., James F. Baichtal, Alwynne B. Beaudoin, Lars Fehren-Schmitz, C. Vance Haynes, Vance T. Holliday, Charles E. Holmes, et al. 2018. \u201cCurrent Evidence Allows Multiple Models for the Peopling of the Americas.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 4 (8): eaat5473. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aat5473\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aat5473<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. 2010. \u201cGenetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 468 (7327): 1053\u20131060.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reich, David, Nick Patterson, Martin Kircher, Frederick Delfin, Madhusudan R. Nandineni, Irina Pugach, Albert Min-Shan Ko, et al. 2011. \u201cDenisova Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 89 (4): 516\u2013528.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Richter, Daniel, Rainer Gr\u00fcn, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Teresa E. Steele, Fethi Amani, Mathieu Ru\u00e9, Paul Fernandes, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Age of the Hominin Fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the Origins of the Middle Stone Age.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 546 (7657): 293\u2013296.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Roberts, Patrick, and Brian A. Stewart. 2018. \u201cDefining the \u2018Generalist-Specialist\u2019 Niche for Pleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Nature Human Behaviour<\/em> 2: 542\u2013550.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Rougier, Helene, \u015etefan Milota, Ricardo Rodrigo, Mircea Gherase, Lauren\u0163iu Sarcin\u01ce, Oana Moldovan, Jo\u00e3o Zilh\u00e3o, et al. 2007. \u201cPe\u015ftera Cu Oase 2 and the Cranial Morphology of Early Modern Europeans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 104 (4): 1165\u20131170.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sahlins, Marshall. 1968. \u201cNotes on the Original Affluent Society.\u201d In <em>Man the Hunter<\/em>, edited by R. B. Lee and I. DeVore, 85\u201389. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.<\/p>\n<p>Saladi\u00e9, P. &amp; Rodr\u00edguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017). Archaeological Evidence for Cannibalism in Prehistoric Western Europe: from Homo antecessor to the Bronze Age. <em>Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 24, 1034\u20131071. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-016-9306-y\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-016-9306-y<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sawyer, G. J., and Blaine Maley. 2005. \u201cNeanderthal Reconstructed.\u201d <em>The Anatomical Record (Part B: New Anat.)<\/em> 283 (1): 23\u201331.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scerri, Eleanor M. L., Mark G. Thomas, Andrea Manica, Philipp Gunz, Jay T. Stock, Chris Stringer, Matt Grove, et al. 2018. \u201cDid Our Species Evolve in Subdivided Populations Across Africa, and Why Does It Matter?\u201d <em>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution<\/em> 33 (8): 582\u2013594.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shea, John J. 2011. \u201cRefuting a Myth about Human Origins.\u201d <em>American Scientist<\/em> 99 (2): 128\u2013135.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shea, John J., and Ofer Bar-Yosef. 2005. \u201cWho Were the Skhul\/Qafzeh People? An Archaeological Perspective on Eurasia\u2019s Oldest Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Societ<\/em><em>y<\/em> 35: 451\u2013468.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slatkin, Montgomery, and Fernando Racimo. 2016. \u201cAncient DNA and Human History.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 113 (23): 6380\u20136387.<\/p>\n<p>Smithsonian Institution. (2023, June 26). <em data-start=\"201\" data-end=\"278\">Humans\u2019 evolutionary relatives butchered one another 1.45 million years ago.<\/em>\u00a0Smithsonian Institution. <a class=\"decorated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener\" data-start=\"321\" data-end=\"431\">https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smith, Fred H., James C. M. Ahern, Ivor Jankovi\u0107, and Ivor Karavani\u0107. 2017. \u201cThe Assimilation Model of Modern Human Origins in Light of Current Genetic and Genomic Knowledge.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 450: 126\u2013136.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smith, Michael. 2009. \u201cV. Gordon Childe and the Urban Revolution: A Historical Perspective on a Revolution in Urban Studies.\u201d <em>Town Planning Review<\/em> 80 (1): 3\u201329.<\/p>\n<p>Spence, M., &amp; Jackson, L. J. (2014). The Bioarchaeology of Cannibalism at the Charity Site.<em> Journal of The Ontario Archaeological Society<\/em> , 94, 65\u201380. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/14371786\/The_Bioarchaeology_of_Cannibalism_at_the_Charity_Site\">https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/14371786\/The_Bioarchaeology_of_Cannibalism_at_the_Charity_Site<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stock, Jay T. 2008. \u201cAre Humans Still Evolving?\u201d <em>EMBO Reports<\/em> 9 (Suppl 1): S51\u2013S54.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Swisher, Mark E., Dennis L. Jenkins, Lionel E. Jackson Jr., and Fred M. Phillips. 2013. \u201cA Reassessment of the Role of the Canadian Ice-Free Corridor in Light of New Geological Evidence.\u201d Poster Symposium 5B: Geology, Geochronology and Paleoenvironments of the First Americans at the Paleoamerican Odyssey Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico, October 16\u201319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Thorne, A. G., and P. G. Macumber. 1972. \u201cDiscoveries of Late Pleistocene Man at Kow Swamp, Australia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 238 (5363): 316\u2013319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Trinkaus, Erik, \u015etefan Milota, Ricardo Rodrigo, Gherase Mircea, and Oana Moldovan. 2003a. \u201cEarly Modern Human Cranial Remains from the Pe\u015ftera Cu Oase, Romania.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 45 (3): 245\u2013253.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Trinkaus, Erik, Oana Moldovan, Adrian B\u00eelg\u0103r, Lauren\u0163iu Sarcina, Sheela Athreya, Shara E Bailey, Ricardo Rodrigo, Gherase Mircea, Thomas Higham, and Christopher Bronk Ramsey. 2003b. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from the Pe\u015ftera Cu Oase, Romania.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 100 (20): 11231\u201311236.<\/p>\n<p>Ullrich, H. (2005). Cannibalistic rites within mortuary practices from the palaeolithic to middle aged in Europe. Anthropologie (1962-), 43(2\/3), 249\u2013261. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26292739\">http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26292739<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Velem\u00ednsk\u00e1, J., J. Br\u016fzek, P. Velem\u00ednsk\u00fd, L. Bigoni, A. Sefc\u00e1kov\u00e1, and S. Katina. 2008. \u201cVariability of the Upper-Palaeolithic Skulls from Predmost\u00ed Near Prerov (Czech Republic): Craniometric Comparison with Recent Human Standards.\u201d <em>Homo<\/em> 59 (1): 1\u201326.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Vidal, C\u00e9line M., Christine S. Lane, Asfawossen Asrat, Dan N. Barfod, Darren F. Mark, Emma L. Tomlinson, Ambdemichael Zafu Tadesse, et al. (2022). \u201cAge of the Oldest Known <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> from Eastern Africa. <em>Nature<\/em> 601 (7894): 579\u2013583.<\/p>\n<p>Villa, P., Bouville, C., Courtin, J., Helmer, D., Mahieu, E., Shipman, P., Belluomini, G. &amp; Branca, M. (1986). Cannibalism in the Neolithic. <em>Science<\/em>, 233(4762), 431\u2013437. doi:10.1126\/science.233.4762.431<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Villa, Paola, Sylvain Soriano, Tsenka Tsanova, Ilaria Degano, Thomas F. G. Higham, Francesco d\u2019Errico, Lucinda Backwell, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Maria Perla Colombini, and Peter B. Beaumont. 2012. \u201cBorder Cave and the Beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 109 (33): 13208\u201313213.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wall, Jeffrey D., and Deborah Yoshihara Caldeira Brandt. 2016. \u201cArchaic Admixture in Human History.\u201d <em>Current Opinion in Genetics &amp; Development<\/em> 41: 93\u201397.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">White, Tim D., Berhane Asfaw, David DeGusta, Henry Gilbert, Gary D. Richards, Gen Suwa, and F. Clark Howell. 2003. \u201cPleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> from Middle Awash, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 423 (6941): 742\u2013747.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Woo, Ju-Kang. 1959. \u201cHuman Fossils Found in Liukiang, Kwangsi, China.\u201d <em>Vertebrata PalAsiatica<\/em> 3 (3): 109\u2013118.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wu, XiuJie, Wu Liu, Wei Dong, JieMin Que, and YanFang Wang. 2008. \u201cThe Brain Morphology of Homo Liujiang Cranium Fossil by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography.\u201d <em>Chinese Science Bulletin<\/em> 53 (16): 2513\u20132519.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Acknowledgments<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">I could not have undertaken this project without the help of many who got me to where I am today. I extend sincere thank yous to the many colleagues and former students who have inspired me to keep learning and talking about anthropology. Thank you also to all who are involved in this textbook project. The anonymous reviewers truly sparked improvements to the chapter. Lastly, the staff of Starbucks #5772 also contributed immensely to this text.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1643\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1643\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>This page provides a record of edits and changes made to this book since its initial publication. If the change is minor, the version number increases by 0.1. If the edits involve substantial updates, the version number increases to the next full number. Due to the nature of the open textbook being continuously updated, the addition or removal of a resource is not recorded on this page.<\/p>\n<p>For feedback, get in touch with salinda.hess@concordia.ca.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%;height: 138px\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 8.46098%\" scope=\"col\">Version<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 5.83516%\" scope=\"col\">Date<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 58.1674%\" scope=\"col\">Change<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 16.8874%\">Pressbooks Platform<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 10.6492%\" scope=\"col\">Affected Web Page<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%;height: 31px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">1.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%;height: 31px\">2019<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1674%;height: 31px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">, <\/a>2019, edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%\">University of Hawai\u02bbi's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%;height: 31px\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%;height: 31px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\/\">2.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%;height: 31px\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1674%;height: 31px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition<\/a>, 2023, edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%\">California State University's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%;height: 31px\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 8.46098%\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">2.1<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 5.83516%\">2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 58.1674%\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, annotated 2nd edition,<\/a> 2024, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Adopted with annotations from Salinda Hess' students for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024. Learn more about the annotations in Hess' <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/front-matter\/introduction\/\">Introduction for ANTH 203: Culture and Biology.\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%\">Concordia University Library's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 10.6492%\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 46px;width: 8.46098%\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/\">3.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px;width: 5.83516%\">2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px;width: 58.1674%\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a>, 3rd edition, 2026, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Customized by Salinda Hess from the annotated 2nd edition for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology. Learn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\">student contributions.<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%\">Concordia University Library's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px;width: 10.6492%\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1642\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1642\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1638\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1638\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>This page provides a record of edits and changes made to this book since its initial publication. If the change is minor, the version number increases by 0.1. If the edits involve substantial updates, the version number increases to the next full number. Due to the nature of the open textbook being continuously updated, the addition or removal of a resource is not recorded on this page.<\/p>\n<p>For feedback, get in touch with salinda.hess@concordia.ca.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%; height: 138px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 8.46098%;\" scope=\"col\">Version<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 5.83516%;\" scope=\"col\">Date<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 58.1674%;\" scope=\"col\">Change<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 16.8874%;\">Pressbooks Platform<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6492%;\" scope=\"col\">Affected Web Page<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">1.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%; height: 31px;\">2019<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1674%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">, <\/a>2019, edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%;\">University of Hawai\u02bbi's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%; height: 31px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\/\">2.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%; height: 31px;\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1674%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition<\/a>, 2023, edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%;\">California State University's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%; height: 31px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 8.46098%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">2.1<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 5.83516%;\">2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 58.1674%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, annotated 2nd edition,<\/a> 2024, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Adopted with annotations from Salinda Hess' students for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024. Learn more about the annotations in Hess' <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/front-matter\/introduction\/\">Introduction for ANTH 203: Culture and Biology.\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%;\">Concordia University Library's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6492%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 8.46098%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/\">3.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 5.83516%;\">2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 58.1674%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a>, 3rd edition, 2026, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Customized by Salinda Hess from the annotated 2nd edition for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology. Learn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\">student contributions.<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.8874%;\">Concordia University Library's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 10.6492%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1639\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1639\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1644\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1644\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1645\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1645\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p><img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1468\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2026\/07\/ANTH-203-Book-Cover-1-ANTH203-Edition-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_1646\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_1646\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p><img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1468\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2026\/07\/ANTH-203-Book-Cover-1-ANTH203-Edition-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2528\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2528\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2529\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2529\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2530\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2530\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2531\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2531\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2532\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2532\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2533\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2533\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1689_2537\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1689_2537\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><\/div>","protected":false},"author":96,"menu_order":24,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["amanda-wolcott-paskey","annmarie-beasley-cisneros"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[100,101],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1689","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-amanda-wolcott-paskey","contributor-annmarie-beasley-cisneros"],"part":20,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/96"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1689\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1807,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1689\/revisions\/1807"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/20"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1689\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1689"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1689"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}