{"id":1678,"date":"2026-08-20T17:14:51","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T21:14:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=1678"},"modified":"2026-09-01T13:35:25","modified_gmt":"2026-09-01T17:35:25","slug":"primate-ecology-and-behaviour-test-wip","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/chapter\/primate-ecology-and-behaviour-test-wip\/","title":{"raw":"Primate Ecology and Behaviour","rendered":"Primate Ecology and Behaviour"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n\r\nLearn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/about-the-authors\/\">authors and editors<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\"> Hess' student contributions<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/versioning-history\/\">versioning history<\/a>.\r\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the variables that affect primate diets.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how primates interact with other organisms in their environment.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss why primates live in groups, types of primate groups, and components of their social systems.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the reproductive strategies of males and females.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain the ways in which primates communicate.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss the evidence for primate cultural traditions.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nonhuman primates (hereafter, 'primates') are a fascinating group of animals, whose similarity to humans can be striking. Because of this similarity, studying primates helps anthropologists to gain insight into how our human ancestors may have behaved. It also allows us to better understand our own behaviour through <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"928\"]comparison[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (examining similarities and differences) with other primates as well as by comparing different species of primates to one another. In this way, studying primates helps anthropologists comprehend humanity from a biological perspective, which contributes to anthropology\u2019s commitment to <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"930\"]holism,[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> the idea that the parts of a system interconnect and interact to make up the whole.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"242\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/05\/image3.png\" alt=\"A person using binoculars to look at monkeys.\" width=\"242\" height=\"354\" \/> Figure 7.1: The author observing patas monkeys from a distance in Laikipia, Kenya. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Karin Enstam Jaffe observing patas monkeys in Laikipia, Kenya (Figure 6.5)<\/a> by Rebecca Chancellor is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<strong>[pb_glossary id=\"932\"]Ethology[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>is the study of animal behaviour, while <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"934\"]primatology [\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>is the study of primate behaviour. People who study primates are called <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"936\"]primatologists[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>. Research on primates can be conducted in the field (i.e., on wild primates) or in captivity (i.e., zoos) and may or may not involve experiments, such as playing recorded alarm calls to see how individuals react. Unlike some other Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields, primatology has a long history of research conducted by women (see \u201cSpecial Topic: Women in Primatology\u201d). Primatologists come from many different disciplines, have diverse backgrounds, and study primates for different reasons. Biologists study primates as examples of evolutionary theories like natural selection, and to understand behaviours as <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"938\"]adaptations[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or traits with a function that increases <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"940\"]fitness[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, i.e. an individual\u2019s survival and\/or reproduction. Primate intelligence is of interest to psychologists who want to learn more about deception or cooperation and to linguists interested in the principles of communication and language. Ecologists consider how primates interact with the habitats they occupy, and conservationists examine how primates are affected by deforestation, poaching, or illegal animal trade (see Appendix B: Primate Conservation for more information on these topics). Biological anthropologists, like myself (Figure 7.1), who study primates are interested in learning about their social complexity, and ecological and behavioural variation, to better understand the biological basis of human behaviour. And, similar to biologists, we also explore how primate behaviour is adaptive and contributes to individual fitness. Like other sciences, primatology is only as strong as its researchers, methods, and theories, and the field has benefitted recently from efforts to increase diversity and reckon with its colonialist past, as discussed below in \u201cSpecial Topic: Women in Primatology.\u201d\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Humans share many traits in common with primates. As you learned in Chapter 5, some of these traits are similar due to <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"944\"]homology[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, traits both species inherited from a common primate ancestor. For example, like most other primates, humans are social animals who live in groups. Group living did not evolve independently in humans and other primates. Rather, group living is a trait that evolved in a primate ancestor, and because it benefited survival, it was retained in the species\u2019 <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"946\"]descendants[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (or the species that come after the ancestor species). In contrast, humans and other primates can have similar traits that evolved independently, which is called <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"948\"]analogy[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>. For example, both humans and Japanese macaques (<em>Macaca fuscata<\/em>) use natural hot springs (Figures 7.2a &amp; b). Research on these monkeys indicates that sitting in hot springs reduces stress and helps keep them warm, much as it does for humans (Takeshita Et al. 2018). But this behaviour is not the result of humans and Japanese macaques having a shared ancestor who used hot springs. Rather, the behaviour arose independently in two species that both occupy northerly environments and adapted to cold climates using a similar behaviour. Studying the homologous traits we share with other primates, like living in groups, helps us develop hypotheses about human behaviours as adaptations, which in turn helps us develop models for the behaviour of our human ancestors. Studying analogous traits, like hot springs use, allows us to better understand the effects of ecological variables on morphology and behaviour of both primates and humans, living and extinct.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_191\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"2161\"]<img class=\"wp-image-189 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.2.jpg\" alt=\"Left, a man in a hot spring. Right, monkeys in a hot spring.\" width=\"2161\" height=\"803\" \/> Figure 7.2a\/b: Both humans (left) and Japanese macaques (right) use natural hot springs to reduce stress and relax. This similar trait arose independently in the two species, making it a good example of analogy. Credit: 7.2a. <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/hot-spring-landscape-man-mountain-1846721\/\">Hot Spring Landscape<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/pexels-2286921\/?utm_source=link-attribution&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=image&amp;utm_content=1846721\">Pexels<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a> under a <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>. 7.2b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Jigokudani_hotspring_in_Nagano_Japan_001.jpg\">Jigokudani hotspring in Nagano Japan 001<\/a> by Yosemite is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Women in Primatology<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While many STEM fields have traditionally been, and continue to be, dominated by men, primatology has a long history of significant research conducted by women. This is due, in part, to the fact that three of the most well-known primatologists are women. In the early 1960s, British paleoanthropologist Louis Leakey (discussed in Chapters 9 and 10) was looking for students to study the great apes in hopes of shedding light on the behaviours of our early ancestors. He chose Jane Goodall (Figure 7.3a) to study chimpanzees (<em>Pan troglodytes<\/em>), Birute Galdikas (Figure 7.3b) to study Bornean orangutans (<em>Pongo pygmaeus<\/em>), and Dian Fossey (Figure 7.3c) to study mountain gorillas (<em>Gorilla<\/em><em> beringei beringei<\/em>). The work of these three women, sometimes referred to as Leakey\u2019s \u201cTrimates,\u201d has transformed our understanding of ape (and primate) behaviour.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_190\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"626\"]<img class=\"wp-image-190\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.3-1.jpg\" alt=\"Jane Goodall, Birute Galdikas, and Dian Fossey.\" width=\"626\" height=\"209\" \/> Figure 7.3a-c: Louis Leakey\u2019s \u201cTrimates\u201d (left to right): a. Jane Goodall\u2019s research on the Gombe chimpanzees spans over half a century; b. Birute Galdikas\u2019s research and rescue work on behalf of orangutans spans 40 years; c. Dian Fossey studied mountain gorillas in Rwanda for almost 20 years, until her murder in 1985. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Jane_Goodall_HK.jpg\">Jane Goodall HK<\/a> by Jeekc has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dr_Birute_Galdikas.jpg\">Dr Birute Galdikas<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/sfupamr\/\"> Simon Fraser University - University Communications<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>. c. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mary-lynn\/2925879356\">US-223658 Dian Fossey<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mary-lynn\/2925879356\/\"> Mary-Lynn<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Arriving at the Gombe Stream Reserve in Tanzania in 1960, Jane Goodall was one of the first scientists to conduct a long-term study of wild nonhuman primates. Before then, most studies lasted less than a year and were often zoo-based. By 1961, she had made two astounding observations that forced us to reconsider what differentiates humans from the rest of the primate order. She observed chimpanzees eating a colobus monkey, the first reported evidence of meat eating in our closest relatives; later observing them hunting and sharing meat. And she discovered that chimpanzees make and use tools by stripping leaves off twigs to \u201cfish\u201d for termites. Her work, spanning several decades, has produced long-term data on chimpanzee mating strategies, mother-infant bonds, and aggression. In the mid-1980s, Goodall transitioned from field researcher to conservationist and activist, advocating for the humane use of nonhuman animals (Stanford 2017).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Birute Galdikas began her study of orangutans in Kalimantan, Borneo, in 1971. Hers was the first long-term study conducted on the Bornean orangutan. Galdikas and her colleagues have collected over 150,000 hours of observational data, focusing on the life histories of individual orangutans. While conducting behavioural research, Galdikas discovered that the pet trade and habitat loss were adversely affecting the orangutan population. Eventually, Galdikas\u2019s conservation efforts began to extend beyond advocacy and into rehabilitation and forest preservation (Bell 2017). If you would like to learn more about primate conservation efforts, please see Appendix B: Primate Conservation.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1967, Dian Fossey began her long-term study of mountain gorillas and founded the Karisoke Research Centre in Rwanda. Her and her colleagues\u2019 research, over several decades, revealed much about gorilla social behaviour, ecology, and life history. Her efforts also led to the development of mountain gorilla conservation programs. However, she was a controversial figure, as discussed below. Fossey was murdered in December 1985; the case remains unsolved (Stewart 2017).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Decolonizing Primatology<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recently, the movement to <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"942\"]decolonize[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> primatology, by understanding and highlighting the theories and research of non-Western individuals and perspectives, has gathered steam. This movement draws attention to the maltreatment of local people by Western primatologists. For example, Michelle Rodrigues (2019) argues that it's time we stop focusing on the scientific and conservation contributions of Dian Fossey and acknowledge that her \"active conservation\" techniques included kidnapping and torturing local Rwandans who were known as, or suspected to be, gorilla poachers. Rodrigues (2019) argues:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The image of Fossey, a white American woman, whipping and torturing black African poachers is evocative of the behaviour of white slaveholders in the American South. It is appalling enough to think of that behaviour occurring in the 1850s; there is no way we can explain Fossey\u2019s behaviour in the 1970s as the product of \u201ca different time.\u201d Yet, almost three decades later, the romantic notion of a noble martyr who died for her devotion to gorillas prevails, and these terrifying actions are often described as simply unorthodox methods. Perhaps these truths are softened due to fears that the reality of this legacy would harm gorilla conservation efforts. But memorializing her as a martyr and patron saint of gorilla conservation demands that we forget the cruel acts she advocated for and performed.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Further, Louis Leakey\u2019s installment of Goodall, Galdikas, and Fossey to study chimpanzees, orangutans, and mountain gorillas, respectively, is itself viewed as recapitulating the colonial legacy in Africa and Asia. Given that Leakey was the offspring of British missionaries, Rodrigues (2019) argues, it is no accident that he was willing to mentor British and American women, while overlooking women from Africa and Asia as potential researchers. This leads us to another level of the decolonizing movement, which aims to highlight the research of non-Western primatologists, particularly those living in what primatologists refer to as \u201chabitat countries\u201d that are home to living primates. As you will see in this chapter, scientists from diverse backgrounds are active contributors to exciting research on primates around the world.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Ecology<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The more than 600 species and subspecies of living primates are highly diverse in their dietary preferences and the habitats they occupy. In this section we\u2019ll briefly discuss aspects of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"950\"]ecology[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or the relationship between organisms and their physical surroundings, that impact a primate\u2019s life, the foods they eat, and the other species with whom they interact.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primate Diets<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Diet may be the most important variable influencing variation in primate morphology, behaviour, and ecology. Most primates are <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"952\"]omnivores[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> who ingest a variety of foods in order to obtain appropriate levels of protein, carbohydrates, fats, and fluids, but one type of food often makes up the majority of each species\u2019 diet. You learned about the dental and digestive adaptations of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"954\"]frugivores[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (who feed primarily on fruit), <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"956\"]folivores[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (whose diet consists mostly of leaves), and <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"958\"]insectivores[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>(who eat mainly insects) in Chapter 6, so we will not discuss them again here.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Body Size and Diet<\/em><\/h4>\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_191\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"559\"]<img class=\"wp-image-191\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.4-1.jpg\" alt=\"A tarsier eats a grasshopper. A gorilla eats leaves.\" width=\"559\" height=\"237\" \/> Figure 7.4a-b: Primates eat different types of food. Small primates, like the spectral tarsier (left), eat mostly insects while large primates, like the mountain gorilla (right), eat mostly leaves. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_tarsier_(7911549768).jpg\">Spectral Tarsier Tarsius tarsier (7911549768)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\"> Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mountain_gorilla_(Gorilla_beringei_beringei)_eating.jpg\">Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) eating<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sharpphotography.co.uk\/\"> Charles J Sharp<\/a> (creator QS:P170,Q54800218) has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nInsects are a high-quality food, full of easily digestible protein and high in calories that meet most of a primate\u2019s dietary needs. Although all primates will eat insects if they come upon them, those species that rely most heavily on insects tend to be the smallest. Why? Because larger primates simply cannot capture and consume enough insects every day to survive. Because of their small size (less than 150 g), spectral tarsiers (<em>Tarsius spectrum<\/em>) have a fast <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"960\"]metabolism[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which means they turn food to energy quickly, but they do not need to consume large amounts of food each day. It does not matter to a spectral tarsier that a grasshopper only weighs 300 mg, because the tarsier (<em>Tarsius<\/em>) itself is so small that one grasshopper is a good-size meal (Figure 7.4a). That same grasshopper is not even a snack for an adult male mountain gorilla (<em>Gorilla beringei beringei<\/em>), who may weigh up to 200 kg. Fortunately for gorillas (<em>Gorilla)<\/em>, their large body size means they have a slow metabolism, converting food into energy much more slowly, so they can eat lower quality food that takes longer to digest, provided there is a lot of it. For gorillas, leaves, which are hard to digest but plentiful, fit the bill (Figure 7.4b). Most medium-sized primates are highly frugivorous, and supplement their fruit based diet in ways that correspond with their size: Smaller frugivores tend to supplement with insects, while larger frugivores tend to supplement with leaves.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Food Abundance and Distribution<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nutrients are not the only dietary considerations primates must make. They must also ensure that they consume more calories than they use. The abundance and distribution of food affect energy expenditure and calorie intake because they determine how far animals must travel in search of food and how much they must compete to obtain it. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"962\"]Abundance[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>refers to how much food is available in a given area while <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"964\"]distribution[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> refers to how food is spread out. In terms of abundance, food is either plentiful or scarce (Figure 7.5a\u2013b). Food is distributed in one of three ways: uniformly (Figure 7.6a), in clumps (Figure 7.6b), or randomly (Figure 7.6c). In general, higher-quality foods, like fruit and insects, are less abundant and have patchier distributions than lower-quality foods, like leaves. Primates who eat fruit or insects usually have to travel farther to find food and burn more calories in the process. Abundance and distribution of food is another reason why larger primates tend to rely more heavily on leaves than either fruit or insects.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"619\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-2.png\" alt=\"Two squares with different amounts of dots. \" width=\"619\" height=\"286\" \/> Figure 7.5a-b: Two types of food abundance. Food is plentiful when there is a lot of it in a given area (left). Food is scarce when there is not very much of it in a given area (right). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Food abundance and food scarcity (Figure 6.7)<\/a> by Karin Enstam Jaffe original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"690\"]<img style=\"font-size: 1em\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-2.png\" alt=\"Three squares with dots in different formations. \" width=\"690\" height=\"214\" \/> Figure 7.6a-c: Three types of food distribution. a. Food has a uniform distribution when it is spread out evenly in the environment. b. Food has a clumped distribution when it is found in patches. c. Food is randomly distributed when it has neither uniform nor clumped distribution. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Food distribution patterns (Figure 6.8)<\/a> by Karin Enstam Jaffe original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Community Ecology<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are members of broader ecological communities composed of other species, including other primates, predators, parasites, and even humans. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"966\"]Community ecology[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> deals with the relationships and interactions between different organisms that occupy the same habitat. Interactions with <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"968\"]conspecifics[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>(members of the same species) and <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"970\"]heterospecifics[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (members of different species) are critical aspects of ecological communities. Some habitats support highly diverse <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"972\"]primate communities[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> consisting of 10 or more primate species. How can so many primate species occupy the same area and avoid competition? In most cases, the primate species that live together occupy different <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"974\"]niches[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which means they do not meet their needs for food and shelter in the exact same way. Two species can avoid competition by eating different kinds of food, living at different levels of a forest, or even searching for food at different times of day. Because tropical rainforests, like Manu National Park in Peru, are highly variable, with many habitats and many sources of food and shelter, there are many different niches for multiple species to exploit, and large primate communities can result (Figure 7.7).<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"710\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1-1.png\" alt=\"Eight primate species.\" width=\"710\" height=\"550\" \/> Figure 7.7: Eight of the 14 primate species in Manu National Park, Peru. Top row, left to right: Goeldi\u2019s marmoset (Callimico goeldi), Rio Tapaj\u00f3s saki (Pithecia irrorata), tufted capuchin (Sapajus apella); middle row, left to right: emperor tamarin (Saguinus imperator), black-headed night monkey (Aotus nigriceps), Bolivian red howler (Alouatta sara); bottom row, left to right: black-capped squirrel monkey (Saimiri boliviensis), Peruvian spider monkey (Ateles chamek). Credit: Primate species in Manu National Park original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Jaffe is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/31223088@N08\/5582747190\/\">Tamarin Baby\/Goeldi\u2019s Monkey<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/31223088@N08\/\">stefan_fotos<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Pithecia_irrorata_-Brazil-8b.jpg\">Pithecia irrorata -Brazil-8b<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/9092428@N04\">Ana_Cotta<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tufted_capuchin_on_a_branch_in_Singapore.jpg\">Tufted Capuchin on a Branch in Singapor<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Basile_Morin\">Basile_Morin<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tamarin_portrait.JPG\">Tamarin Portrait<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/thebrockeninglory\/?pli=1\">Brocken Inaglory<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Aotus_nigriceps_1.jpg\">Aotus nigriceps 1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/dusantos_bh\/\">DuSantos<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Alouatta_sara_%28Bolivian_red_howler%29.jpg\">Aloutta sara (Bolivian Red Howler)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/nacho_dayz\/\">Raul Ignacio<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Black-capped_squirrel_monkey_%28Chalalan%29.jpg\">Black-Capped Squirrel Monkey (Chalalan)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Rodrigo_Mariaca\">Rodrigo Mariaca<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/eye1\/3185562151\/\">Maquisapa (Spider Monkey)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/eye1\/\">Ivan Mlinaric<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>].[\/caption]\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Competitive Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although species living in the same location often occupy different niches to avoid competition, when a resource that is important for survival or reproduction is scarce, individuals will compete to obtain that resource. This is a central tenet of Charles Darwin\u2019s theory of evolution by natural selection (see Chapter 2 &amp; 3). Competition between primates takes two forms: Individuals engage in <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"976\"]direct competition[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which involves physical interaction between individuals (such as fighting), over resources that are large and worth defending (fruit is a good example of a food resource over which primates will fight). Individuals engage in <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"978\"]indirect competition[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, in which there is no physical interaction between individuals, when a resource is small. Primates often engage in indirect competition for insects, like grasshoppers, that are eaten quickly, often before another individual arrives on the scene. Primates may engage in direct and\/or indirect competition with members of their own group, with members of other groups of conspecifics, or with heterospecifics.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Predator-Prey Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The plants and animals that primates eat are an important part of their ecological community. In addition to insects, many primates incorporate some <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"980\"]vertebrate[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (animals with an internal spinal column or backbone) prey into their diet. Often, predation by primates is opportunistic, occurring because the prey happens to be in the right place at the right time. I\u2019ve observed vervets (<em>Chlorocebus pygerythrus<\/em>) opportunistically killing lizards by smashing them against a rock or tree trunk and eating them. More rarely, hunting is deliberate and cooperative. In some chimpanzee (<em>Pan troglodytes<\/em>) populations, hunts involve multiple individuals, each of whom plays a specific role and is rewarded afterward with a share of the prey that has been captured (Samuni Et al. 2018).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All primates are susceptible to predation by mammalian <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"982\"]carnivores[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>(animals whose diet consists primarily of animal tissue (e.g., Figure 7.8a), reptiles (e.g., Figure 7.8b), or birds of prey (e.g., Figure 7.8c). Although the specific predators found in an ecological community differ based on geography, smaller primates always fall prey to a wider range of predators. Because predators are diverse in their hunting tactics, primates have evolved a wide range of tactics to avoid or escape them. We will discuss some of these behavioural adaptations later in this chapter in the section titled \u201cWhy Do Primates Live in Groups?.\u201d<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"765\"]<img class=\"wp-image-195\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.8-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"A leopard, python, and harpy eagle.\" width=\"765\" height=\"229\" \/> Figure 7.8a-c: Examples of primate predators: the Indian leopard (Panthera fusca) is an example of a mammalian carnivore (top left), the South African python (Python natalensis) is an example of a reptilian predator (bottom left), and the harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja) of Central and South America is an example of a bird of prey (right). Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/srikaanth-sekar\/9814267145\/\">Leopard<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/srikaanth-sekar\/\"> Srikaanth Sekar<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Python_natalensis_G._J._Alexander.JPG\">Python natalensis G. J. Alexander<\/a> by Graham J. Alexander, University of the Witwatersrand, USGS, is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\"> public domain<\/a>. c. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Harpy_Eagle_clutching_captured_bird_-_Itirapina_Reserve.jpg\">Harpy Eagle clutching captured bird - Itirapina Reserve<\/a> by Jonathan Wilkins has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Mutualistic Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">So far, we've discussed competitive and predator-prey interactions in primate communities. But there are some interactions (between different primate species and between primates and other species) that are <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"984\"]mutualistic[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which is when organisms of different species work together, each benefiting from the interaction or relationship. One example is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"986\"]seed dispersal[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which is the process by which seeds move away from the plant that produced them in preparation for germination and becoming a new plant. When seeds are dispersed by animals, like primates, it is an example of mutualism. The primate eats the fruit of a plant, which provides nutrients for its body, and in the process ingests the plant\u2019s seeds. Later, it deposits the seeds at another location as a pile of fertilizer.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another example of mutualism is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"988\"]polyspecific associations[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which are associations between two or more different species that are maintained by behavioural changes by at least one of the species. While some associations are short in duration, others are semi-permanent. The mutualistic benefits of polyspecific associations include one species gaining access to food that would otherwise have been inaccessible or being alerted to the presence of predators that they would not have not have known were present otherwise. In some cases, individuals seem to recognize and seek out specific members of another species. Twenty years of observations on chimpanzees and Western lowland gorillas (<em>Gorilla gorilla gorilla<\/em>) in the Republic of Congo has revealed social ties (some might call them friendships) between individual chimpanzees and gorillas that last for years and occur in a variety of social contexts, including play (Sanz Et al. 2022).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Parasite-Host Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are hosts for a variety of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"990\"]parasites[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which are organisms that live in or on another organism (the host). Parasites come in many forms and pose varying levels of danger to the host. Blood parasites cause diseases like yellow fever and malaria. Skin parasites include fleas and ticks, which feed on the host\u2019s blood, and botflies, which lay eggs in the host\u2019s flesh. Bot fly larvae feed on the host\u2019s flesh as they develop and eventually (if not removed) break through the skin at maturity. Gut parasites, like tapeworms, get into the intestines and feed off of the food that is being digested by the host. Because most primates live in groups (see the \u201cPrimate Societies\u201d section of this chapter), the tendency for <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"992\"]social transmission[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> of parasites, or the transfer of parasites from one individual to another, is high. Primates have evolved mechanisms to avoid parasite infection, including switching sleeping and feeding sites so as to avoid parasites. Mandrills (<em>Mandrillus sphinx<\/em>) have been shown to avoid grooming infected conspecifics as well as to avoid their feces, which smell different than the feces of individuals who are not infected with parasites (Poirotte Et al. 2017). Other primates, including chimpanzees, appear to self-medicate when infected with parasites by ingesting plants that have antiparasitic properties (Krief Et al. 2005).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Human-Primate Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Humans are part of many primate communities and our relationship with our closest relatives is often complicated. In some areas, humans hunt primates for their meat or as trophies, or so they can sell the infants as pets. As the human population increases in size, our demand for natural resources, like wood to build houses or land on which to grow food, also increases, often at the expense of pristine primate (and other animal) habitat. As their natural habitat shrinks, primates search for food in areas occupied by humans and may be shot as crop-raiding pests. While deforestation, hunting, and the pet trade are examples of ways in which humans negatively affect the lives of primates, some human-primate interactions are beneficial. In some parts of the world primates are central to <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"994\"]ecotourism[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which focuses on nature-based attractions to educate tourists and uses economically and ecologically sustainable practices. Perhaps one of the greatest success stories of ecotourism involves the mountain gorillas of Rwanda (see Figure 7.4b). After internal conflict plagued Rwanda during the 1990s, the Virunga Mountains area developed gorilla-based tourism to aid in socioeconomic development and to bring stability to the region. This process not only helped to increase mountain gorilla populations but was also able to generate enough income to cover the operation costs of three national parks and provide income and other benefits to people living in the area (Maekawa Et al. 2013). You can learn more about human-primate interactions in Appendix B: Primate Conservation.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Primate Societies<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unlike many other animals, primates are highly social and many live in stable groups consisting of adult males and females, even outside the<strong> [pb_glossary id=\"996\"]breeding season[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, when females are <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"998\"]receptive[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> and available for mating because they are not pregnant or nursing. Indeed, <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1000\"]sociality[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or the tendency to form social groups, is a key behavioural adaptation of the order primates (see Chapter 6). This has led primatologists to ask two questions: \u201cWhy do primates live in groups?\u201d and \u201cWhat types of groups do primates live in?\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Why Do Primates Live in Groups?<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates live in groups when the benefits of doing so exceed the costs. Although there are many potential benefits to group living, enhanced feeding competition and predator avoidance are important benefits for many group living primates. When primates feed on high-quality, scarce food (like fruit), larger groups are more successful in competition with other groups. For example, in a long-term study of vervets in Kenya\u2019s Amboseli National Park, larger vervet groups had larger and better <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1002\"]home ranges[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which is the area in which a group regularly moves around as it performs its daily activities, including searching for food and water. Females in larger groups had higher average infant and female survival rates than the smallest group. Because pregnancy and nursing are energetically expensive for females, female <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1004\"]reproductive success[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or genetic contribution to future generations (measured by the number of offspring produced), is limited by access to food. Although living in a group means females compete with members of their own group for food, the benefits of being a member of a larger vervet group outweigh the costs (Cheney &amp; Seyfarth 1987).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">However, because they contain more individuals, larger groups are more likely to attract the attention of predators compared to smaller groups. This is one of the reasons that primates who rely on <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1006\"]crypsis[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or the ability to avoid detection by others, including predators, are often <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1008\"]solitary[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>(the term used to describe individuals who do not live together with other members of their species) and <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1010\"]nocturnal[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or active at night. If an animal is already hard to see because it is active at night, then moving quietly in small groups is a good strategy to avoid detection by predators. The slow loris (<em>Nycticebus coucang<\/em>) of Southeast Asia is a good example of this strategy (Figure 7.9a). Nocturnal and solitary, the slow loris moves slowly and quietly as its primary strategy to avoid detection (Wiens &amp; Zitzmann 2003). In contrast, primates who live in large groups and are <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1012\"]diurnal[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or active during the day (like gelada baboons [<em>Theropithecus gelada<\/em>]; Figure 7.9b) cannot avoid detection by predators. Instead, group-living primates rely on behaviours that alert others to the presence of danger and\/or deter predators, including shared <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1014\"]vigilance[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (watchful behaviour to detect potential danger), <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1016\"]mobbing[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (the act of cooperatively attacking or harassing a predator), and <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1018\"]alarm calling[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (vocalizations emitted by social animals in response to danger). We will discuss alarm calls in the <em>Communication<\/em> section.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_196\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"761\"]<img class=\"wp-image-196\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.9.jpg\" alt=\"A slow loris. A group of gelada baboons.\" width=\"761\" height=\"269\" \/> Figure 7.9a\/b: Some primates, like the slow loris (left), are solitary and spend most of their time alone. However, most primates, like the gelada baboon (right), live in groups of varying sizes. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Slow_Loris.jpg\">Slow Loris<\/a> by Jmiksanek is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/39997856@N03\/7588490544\">Field of baboons<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/39997856@N03\/\">mariusz kluzniak<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What Types of Groups Do Primates Live In? <\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates vary with regard to the types of groups in which they live. A <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1020\"]social system[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>describes a set of social interactions and behaviours that is typical for a species. The components that make up a species\u2019 social system include:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Group size, which refers to the number of individuals that typically live together. Primate group size can be highly variable, ranging from one or a few individuals, to a few dozen, upward to several hundred individuals.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Group composition describes group membership in terms of age class (e.g., adult, juvenile, infant) and sex. In some primates, groups consist of a mother and her dependent offspring while in others, one adult male lives long-term with one adult female and their dependent offspring. In other species, one or more adult males live with multiple females and their offspring.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">A species\u2019 <strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1022\"]mating system[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> refers to which male(s) and female(s) mate. The terms that describe a mating system (e.g., <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1024\"]polygyny[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, in which one male mates with multiple females) are sometimes used to describe a primate species\u2019 social system, but a mating system is one component of the species\u2019 social system. For example, two species might both have polygynous mating systems, but in one species, the group is composed of one male and multiple females, while members of the other species live as solitary individuals.<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1026\"]Ranging behaviour[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">refers to the way in which animals move about their environment. Most primate species have a home range, where they perform their daily activities. Some primates defend a <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1028\"]territory[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> which is the part of the home range that the group actively guards in an attempt to keep out conspecifics.<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1030\"]Dispersal[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">patterns describe which sex moves to a new group to reproduce. In most primate species, males disperse because the benefits of dispersal, including increased access to mates and reduced competition from other males, outweigh the costs of migrating into a new group, which often comes with aggression from current group members. For many female primates, the opposite is true: females usually benefit from remaining <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1032\"]philopatric[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, or in the group of their birth. This allows them to maintain strong alliances with female relatives, which helps them compete successfully against other groups for food. In solitary species, offspring of both sexes leave their mother\u2019s home range and become solitary. If this did not happen, the species would not be solitary. Even though both sexes disperse in solitary species, males usually disperse farther than females.<\/span><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Social interactions describe the ways in which individuals interact with members of their own and other groups of conspecifics. <strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1034\"]Affiliative[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(i.e., friendly or nonaggressive) behaviours include <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1036\"]grooming[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (picking through the fur of another individual), playing, or <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1038\"]coalitions[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(temporary alliances between individuals). <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1040\"]Agonistic[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (i.e., aggressive) behaviours include fighting over food or fighting over access to mates. In groups that contain multiple adult individuals of the same sex, it is common to have a <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1042\"]dominance hierarchy[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, or a group of individuals that can be ranked according to their relative amount of power over others in the hierarchy. Initially, dominance hierarchies are established through the outcome of conflicts. Individuals who lose conflicts with others are <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"1044\"]subordinate[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (or low rank) to those who win them. Those who win conflicts are <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">[pb_glossary id=\"744\"]dominant[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(or high rank). Dominant individuals gain access to resources, like food or mates, before subordinates. Once a hierarchy is established, agonism decreases because everyone \u201cknows their place.\u201d<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The main types of primate social systems are as follows: solitary; single-male, single-female; single-male, multi-female; multi-male, multi-female; fission-fusion; and multi-male, single-female. These types are discussed below.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Solitary<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recall that the term <em>solitary<\/em> is used to describe species in which individuals do not live or travel together with other members of the same species, except for mothers and unweaned offspring. Males typically occupy a large home range or territory that overlaps the home ranges of multiple females, with whom they mate (Figure 7.10a). Because one male mates with multiple females, the mating system of solitary primates is polygyny. Social interactions between adults are limited but because some males do not get to mate, competition between males is intense. When males compete physically, they benefit from large body size and weaponry. The result is<strong> [pb_glossary id=\"1046\"]sexual dimorphism[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, when males and females look different from one another. Both males and females disperse, although males move farther from their mother than females. The nocturnal West African potto (<em>Perodicticus <\/em><em>potto<\/em>; Figure 7.10b) is solitary. Bornean orangutans, which are diurnal, are also solitary.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"620\"]<img class=\"wp-image-197\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.10-01-1.jpg\" alt=\"Grouping pattern description is available in caption. A potto in a tree at night also shown.\" width=\"620\" height=\"272\" \/> Figure 7.10a-b: Illustration of a solitary species\u2019 grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the male\u2019s home range; open oval represents individual female home ranges. The West African potto is a solitary primate (right). <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: a. Polygyny in a Solitary Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/nikborrow\/31307385633\">West African Potto Perodicticus potto Kakum National Park, Ghana<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/nikborrow\/\"> Nik Barrow<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Single-Male, Single-Female<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primate species in which an adult male and adult female live together with their dependent offspring have a <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1048\"]single-male, single-female[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> social system, sometimes referred to as a \u201cfamily,\u201d with group sizes between two and five individuals. The adult male and adult female engage in behaviours that strengthen their social relationship, or <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1050\"]pair bond[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, including mutual grooming and resting together. The pair defend a territory (Figure 7.11a) and keep same-sex individuals away from their mate. The adult male and adult female mate with each other, so the mating system is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1052\"]monogamy[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, although mating outside the pair bond may occur. Species with monogamous mating systems are usually <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1054\"]sexually monomorphic[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (males and females look similar) because competition for mates is relaxed since most males are able to obtain a mate. Males are usually confident that they are the father of their mate\u2019s infant, so they help with offspring care by carrying the infant when it is not nursing. Once offspring are sexually mature, both males and females disperse. As with solitary species, males disperse farther from their parents than females. Bolivian Gray titi monkeys (<em>Plecturocebus donacophilus<\/em>) are an example of a species that has a single-male, single-female social system. One of their signature behaviours is tail twining, when two individuals sit with their tails wrapped around each other (Figure 7.11b). This behaviour reinforces the social bond among family members and is especially common between the adult male and female. Gibbons (<em>Hylobates<\/em>) and owl monkeys (<em>Aotus<\/em>) also live in single-male, single-female groups.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_198\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"608\"]<img class=\"wp-image-198\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.11-01.jpg\" alt=\"Left: Circle contains one dot (female) and one square (male). Right: Two titi monkeys.\" width=\"608\" height=\"357\" \/> Figure 7.11a-b: Illustration of a single-male, single-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s territory, which the bonded pair defend against conspecifics. The titi monkey (right) is an example of a primate species with a single-male, single-female social system. Credit: a. Single-Male, Single-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Callicebus-brunneus-London-Zoo.jpg\">Two Red Titi Monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) sitting together with their tails intertwined at the London Zoo<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Stevenj\"> Steven G. Johnson<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Single-Male, Multi-Female<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1056\"]Single-male, multi-female[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> groups consist of one adult male living with multiple adult females and their dependent offspring (Figure 7.12a ) . These groups can range from as few as five or ten individuals to as many as 50. Female social relationships are governed by the female dominance hierarchy. Females are usually philopatric and males disperse. Males who are unable to join a group of females may join a bachelor group with other males. Because a single male mates with multiple females, the mating system is polygyny. Species that form single-male, multi-female groups may or may not defend a territory, but the <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1058\"]resident male[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, who lives with a group of females, is aggressive toward other males, who may try to take over the group and become the new resident male. Competition between males to be the resident male of a group is intense, and these species usually display sexual dimorphism, with males being larger than females and possessing large canines. Hanuman langurs (<em>Semnopithecus entellus<\/em>) of India form single-male, multi-female groups (Figure 7.12b). When a new male takes over a group of females and ousts the former resident male, he may commit <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1060\"]infanticide[\/pb_glossary], <\/strong>or kill the unweaned infants. This is especially likely if the new resident male has not yet mated with any of the females and thus cannot be the infants\u2019 father. This causes the females, who were nursing, to become sexually receptive sooner, increasing the new resident male\u2019s chances of producing offspring (Sharma, Ram, and \u200b\u200bRaipurohit 2010). Gorillas, patas monkeys, and golden snub-nosed monkeys (<em>Rhinopithecus roxellana<\/em>) also live in single-male, multi-female groups.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"749\"]<img class=\"wp-image-199\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.12.jpg\" alt=\"Left: Circle contains nine dots and one square; outside are three squares. Right: Adult langur and infant.\" width=\"749\" height=\"295\" \/> Figure 7.12a-b: An illustration of the one-male, multi-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s home range (or territory). The Hanuman langur (right) is an example of a species with a one-male, multi-female social system. Credit: a. Single-Male, Multi-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/photo\/close-up-photo-of-two-gray-langurs-8642891\/\">Close-up of Two Grey Langurs<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/@amitrai10\/\"> Amit Rai<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/license\/\"> free to use via Pexels<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Multi-Male, Multi-Female<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1062\"]Multi-male, multi-female[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> groups consist of multiple adult males living with multiple adult females and their dependent offspring. Although there is more than one adult male, there are more adult females than adult males in the group (Figure 7.13a). Multi-male, multi-female groups can range in size from about ten to as many as 500 individuals. They occupy a home range but may or may not defend a territory. In groups that contain multiple males and multiple females, it is not possible for one male to monopolize all the matings, so the mating system is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1064\"]polygamy[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, in which multiple males mate with multiple females. However, this does not mean that all males have an equal opportunity to mate with all females. In multi-male, multi-female groups, both males and females form a dominance hierarchy. The male dominance hierarchy determines their access to females for mating in much the same way that a female dominance hierarchy determines a female\u2019s access to food. Because their place in the hierarchy can affect their reproductive success, males compete with each other, but because it is rare for males to be excluded from mating altogether, the level of competition and degree of sexual dimorphism are less extreme than what we see in polygynous species. Usually, females are philopatric and males disperse. Vervet monkeys (Figure 7.13b), ring-tailed lemurs (<em>Lemur catta<\/em>), white-faced capuchins (<em>Cebus capucinus<\/em>), and black-capped squirrel monkeys (<em>Saimiri boliviensis<\/em>) live in multi-male, multi-female groups.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"585\"]<img class=\"wp-image-200\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.13.jpg\" alt=\"Circle contains twelve dots and three squares. Right: Two vervet monkeys.\" width=\"585\" height=\"267\" \/> Figure 7.13a-b: An illustration of the multi-male, multi-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s home range (or territory). Vervet monkeys (right) are an example of a species that lives in multi-male, multi-female groups. Credit: a. Multi-Male, Multi-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/berniedup\/6011902081\/\">Vervet Monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\"> Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Fission-Fusion<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1066\"]Fission-fusion[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> is a fluid social system in which the size and composition of the social group changes, with groups splitting (fission) or merging (fusion) depending on food availability (Pinacho-Guendulain &amp; Ramos-Fern\u00e1ndez 2017). When key resources are scarce, individuals spread out (fission) and move and feed individually or in small subgroups (Figure 7.14a). When key food resources are plentiful, individuals come together (fusion) and individuals travel and feed as a more cohesive group (Figure 7.14a). Fission-fusion social structure is believed to reduce feeding competition when resources are scarce. Because group composition changes over time, species with fission-fusion social systems are referred to as a community. Communities consist of multiple adult males, multiple adult females, and offspring, and group size varies but typically ranges from ten to a few dozen individuals. Females typically disperse and males are philopatric. Thus, community males are related and display unusual forms of cooperation. The mating system associated with fission-fusion is polygamy. Because males are not excluded from mating, competition for mates is relaxed and sexual dimorphism is moderate (males are slightly larger than females). Geoffroy\u2019s spider monkeys (<em>Ateles geoffroyi<\/em>) (Figure 7.14b) and chimpanzees both have fission-fusion social system.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"720\"]<img class=\"wp-image-201\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.14.jpg\" alt=\"Diagrams show fission and fusion. Three spider monkeys.\" width=\"720\" height=\"289\" \/> Figure 7.14a-b: An illustration of the fission-fusion grouping pattern appears on the left. The left illustration represents fission, when females travel and feed independently in individual home ranges within the community boundary. The right illustration represents fusion, when community members form a cohesive group. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the community boundary. Open ovals represent individual female home ranges when the group fissions. Credits: a. Fission-Fusion Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/berniedup\/49562895393\">Geoffry\u2019s Spider Monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\">Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Multi-Male, Single-Female<\/em><\/h4>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1068\"]multi-male, single-female[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>groups, two or more males live with one breeding female, her dependent offspring, and non-breeding females (Figure 7.15a). This type of social system is found in the <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1070\"]callitrichids[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, the primate family that includes marmosets (<em>Callithrix<\/em>; Figure 7.15b) and tamarins (<em>Saguinus<\/em>) of Central and South America. Their groups rarely exceed 15 individuals, and each group actively defends their territory from conspecifics. Although more than one adult female may live in the group, the mating system is <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1072\"]polyandry[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> because there is only one breeding female who mates with all of the adult males. This is achieved through <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1074\"]reproductive suppression[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which involves the breeding female preventing other females from reproducing through physiological and\/or behavioural means (Digby, Ferrari, &amp; Salzman 2011). This limits the opportunities for other females in the group to become pregnant. Instead, these females, and the males in the group, help raise the breeding female\u2019s offspring. This is referred to as <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1076\"]cooperative breeding[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> and usually takes the form of carrying infants, grooming them, and protecting them from danger (de Oliveira Terceiro &amp; Burkart 2019). Because reproductive opportunities for female tamarins and marmosets are limited, they are very competitive, and females are slightly larger than males, which helps them compete for the breeding spot in a group.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"578\"]<img class=\"wp-image-202\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.15.jpg\" alt=\"Circle contains two squares, two unmarked dots, and a B dot. Right: Marmosets with twins.\" width=\"578\" height=\"269\" \/> Figure 7.15a-b: An illustration of multi-male, single-female grouping pattern appears on the left. Key: square = adult male; B dot = breeding female; unmarked dot = non-breeding female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s territory, which is defended against conspecifics. The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is an example of a primate species that has this type of social system (right). Credit: a. Multi-Male, Single-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Family_of_Common_Marmoset_-_REGUA_-_Brazil_MG_9480_(12930855765).jpg\">Family of Common Marmoset - REGUA - Brazil MG 9480 (12930855765)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/30818542@N04\"> Francesco Veronesi<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Reproductive Strategies<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reproductive strategies have evolved to maximize individual reproductive success. These strategies can be divided into those that deal with offspring production and care (parental investment) and those that maximize mating success (sexual selection). Because the reproductive physiology of male and female primates differs, males and females differ with regard to parental investment and sexual selection strategies. Female strategies focus on obtaining the food necessary to sustain a pregnancy and choosing the best male(s) to father offspring. Male strategies focus on gaining access to receptive females.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parental Investment<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"362\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9.jpg\" alt=\"Monkey holds baby.\" width=\"362\" height=\"241\" \/> Figure 7.16: A female Japanese macaque nursing her infant. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Snow_monkey_baby_milk_time.jpg\">Snow monkey baby milk time<\/a> by Daisuke Tashiro is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nBiologically speaking, <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1078\"]parental investment[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> is any time or energy a parent devotes to the current offspring that enhances its survival (and eventual reproductive success) at the expense of the parent\u2019s ability to invest in the next offspring (Trivers 1972). Female primates invest more heavily in offspring than males. Even before conception, females produce energy-containing eggs, and they will be responsible for sustaining a fertilized egg until it implants in the uterus. After that, they invest in pregnancy and lactation (Figure 7.16). Because all of this investment requires a lot of energy, female primates can only produce one offspring (or litter) at a time. A species\u2019 <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1080\"]interbirth interval[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or the typical length of time between one birth and the next, is determined by the length of time necessary to maximize each offspring\u2019s survival without jeopardizing the female\u2019s ability to produce the greatest number of offspring possible. If a female invests too little (i.e., weans an offspring too early), she may give birth to many offspring, but very few (if any) of them will survive. If she invests too much (i.e., nurses an offspring even after it could be weaned), she ensures the survival of that individual offspring but will not be able to produce very many during her lifetime. To maximize her reproductive success, a female must invest <em>just<\/em> long enough to ensure the greatest number of offspring survive to reproduce. We often think of maternal care as an <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1082\"]innate[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (or natural), instinctive behaviour. Yet this is not the case. The \u201cSpecial Topic: Is Maternal Behaviour Innate?\u201d dispels the myth that maternal behaviour is solely instinctual and explains how female primates learn to be good mothers.\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual Selection<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1084\"]Sexual selection[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or selection for traits that maximize mating success, comes in two forms. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1086\"]Intrasexual selection[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> is selection for traits that enhance the ability of members of one sex to compete amongst themselves (\u201c<em>intra<\/em>sexual\u201d = within one sex). <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1088\"]Intersexual selection[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> is selection for traits that enhance the ability of one sex to attract the other (\u201c<em>inter<\/em>sexual\u201d = between the sexes).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intrasexual selection most often operates on males. In the wild, adult females are either pregnant or lactating for most of their adult lives. So, in a given population, there are usually more males available and willing to mate than there are females. The result? Females are a scarce resource over which males compete. Intrasexual selection favours traits that help a male win fights with other males. In primates, these traits include large body size (Figure 7.17a) and large canines (Figure 7.17b). Because females don\u2019t possess these same traits, males and females of some species look different; that is, they are sexually dimorphic (Figure 7.17a).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_207\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"691\"]<img class=\"wp-image-204\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.17.jpg\" alt=\"Male baboon with two females. Adult male baboon.\" width=\"691\" height=\"293\" \/> Figure 7.17a-b: a. Hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) are sexually dimorphic. The male (left) is much bigger than the female (centre) and also has different coloured fur. b. Adult males, like this gelada baboon, also have larger canines than females. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dierenpark_Emmen_baboon_(2679944324).jpg\">Dierenpark Emmen baboon (2679944324)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/80538772@N00\"> robin bos<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License.<\/a> b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Olive_Baboon_Papio_anubis_in_Tanzania_3066_Nevit.jpg\">Olive Baboon Papio anubis, Picture Taken in Tanzania<\/a> by Nevit Dilmen has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intersexual selection also tends to operate on males, selecting traits that make a male more attractive to females. Females, in turn, choose among potential fathers. Because female primates invest more in offspring production and care than males (see the \u201cParental Investment\u201d section, above), it is more costly for them if the offspring dies before maturity or reaches maturity but does not reproduce. Thus, it benefits a female primate to be choosy and try to pick the healthiest male as a mate. Males must display traits that tell a female why she should choose <em>him<\/em>, and not another male, as her mate.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What traits are female primates looking for? In humans, women may look for a mate who can provide important resources, such as food, paternal care, or protection. This is rare in other primates, though, since most females do not need males to provide resources. More commonly, female primates obtain genetic benefits for their offspring from choosing one male over another. Often the specific criteria by which females select mates is unknown. However, if a female chooses a healthy (as indicated by traits like a plush coat, bright colouration, or large body size) or older male, she may obtain genes for her offspring that code for health or long life. If a male\u2019s rank is determined by competitive ability that has a genetic component, females who choose males who win fights may acquire these genes (and qualities) for their offspring. Females in some species appear to prefer new immigrants, sometimes even \u201csneaking\u201d copulations with males who are not established members of their groups. Such a preference may provide their offspring with novel genes and increase genetic variation (for more about the importance of genetic variation, see Chapter 4). Female choice is often more subtle than male-male competition, so it can be more difficult to study. However, as more research is conducted, we continue to improve our understanding of the ways that female primates exert their choice.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Is Maternal Behaviour Innate?<\/h2>\r\nZoos almost always have nurseries where infants are cared for by zookeepers if their mothers will not care for them (Figure 7.18). These exhibits are among the most popular because the babies are so cute and so much fun to watch. And the caretaking positions in zoo nurseries are often among the most coveted by zoo personnel for the same reasons. But if maternal behaviour is instinctive, why do zoo nurseries even exist? The answer is that in many species, including primates, maternal behaviour is not purely instinctual; it is dependent on <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1090\"]social learning[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (behaviour learned by observing and imitating others), as well.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"433\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-1.png\" alt=\"Newborn orangutan feeding from a bottle.\" width=\"433\" height=\"336\" \/> Figure 7.18: Newborn orangutan at Audubon Zoo being bottle-fed. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/newsroom.audubonnatureinstitute.org\/critically-endangered-orangutan-gives-birth-at-audubon-zoo\/\">Newborn orangutan born at Audubon Zoo being bottle fed<\/a> (2022) by<a href=\"https:\/\/audubonnatureinstitute.org\/\"> Audubon Nature Institute<\/a> is used by permission.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nCaptive female primates, including gorillas and chimpanzees, who have not had the opportunity to observe their mother or other females care for infants do not know how to care for their own offspring. Although it is preferred that the primate mother care for her own infant, there are cases when she will not and humans must step in to ensure the offspring survives. When hand-rearing by humans is necessary, the infant is returned to the group as soon as possible in the hopes that it will learn species-typical behaviour from its mother and other conspecifics. Observations such as these indicate that maternal behaviour is learned, not innate, and that maternal care is critically important to the social and psychological development of young primates.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Communication<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In its most basic form, communication occurs when one individual (the sender) emits a signal that conveys information, which is detected by another individual (the receiver). We have discussed several aspects of primate sociality in this chapter, all of which require the communication of information between individuals. But exactly <em>how<\/em> does a female chimpanzee communicate her sexual availability? <em>How<\/em> does a vervet monkey communicate the approach of a leopard or that a python is nearby? <em>How<\/em> do solitary, nocturnal primates, like the slow loris, communicate information about themselves to conspecifics? Primate communication comes in four forms: vocal, visual, olfactory, and tactile. Species vary in their reliance on each.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vocal Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates use sound to communicate danger or threats, to claim and maintain a territory, or make contact with other group members. Alarm calls are given in response to predators. In some cases, alarm calls are used to alert members of the group to the presence of a predator so they can take evasive action. In other cases, they are directed at the predator itself, signaling that it has been detected. You can learn more about alarm calls as forms of vocal communication in the highlight box in this chapter entitled \u201cDig Deeper: Alarm Calls: Signals to Friends or Foes?.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Loud calls are designed to travel great distances and are used in territorial defence by many primate species including indris (<em>Indri indri<\/em>), orangutans, gibbons, and howler monkeys (<em>Alouatta<\/em>). In dense forest, where visual communication can be difficult, loud calls can be useful in signaling to conspecifics that a group or individual occupies a specific area. Howler monkeys are named for their loud calls, or \u201croars,\u201d which can be heard one kilometre or more away (Sch\u00f6n Ybarra 1986). Howler monkey roars may act to maintain distance between neighbouring groups or keep extragroup males from entering the home range (1986).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other vocalizations are intended to communicate with individuals in one\u2019s own group. These include vocalizations given as part of threat displays or dominance interactions, as well as contact calls that provide information about one\u2019s location to other group members. Chacma baboons (<em>Papio ursinus<\/em>) have a rich repertoire of vocalizations for communicating with other group members (Fischer Et al. 2008). Adult males give specific vocalizations during threat displays and physical confrontations. Subordinates \u201cscreech\u201d when retreating from a dominant individual, signaling submission. Since baboons rely on membership in their group for finding food and detecting predators, a baboon separated from his group will vocalize in an attempt to regain contact. Young baboons emit their own contact calls when separated from their mothers.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Visual Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_207\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"493\"]<img class=\"wp-image-206\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.19.jpg\" alt=\"Female baboon with sexual swelling. Male and female baboon.\" width=\"493\" height=\"209\" \/> Figure 7.19a-b: Two female hamadryas baboons. The female on the left has a sexual swelling while the female on the right (in foreground, with infant clinging to her belly) does not. An adult male is behind her. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Sexual_swelling_in_female_Hamadryas_baboon.jpg\">Sexual swelling in female Hamadryas baboon<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mamoritai\/\"> Mamoritai<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Hamadryas_baboon_at_Giza_Zoo_by_Hatem_Moushir_36.JPG\">Hamadryas baboon at Giza Zoo by Hatem Moushir 36<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Hatem_Moushir\"> Hatem Moushir<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1092\"]Visual communication[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which involves signals that can be seen, is an important component of nonhuman primate behaviour, alone or in combination with other forms of communication. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1094\"]Piloerection[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or raising one\u2019s hair or fur, is used in aggressive interactions to make an individual appear larger than it actually is. Female macaques (<em>Macaca<\/em>), baboons (<em>Papio<\/em>), and chimpanzees, signal sexual receptivity through changes in the size, shape, and, often, colour of their hindquarters, called a <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1096\"]sexual swelling[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (Figure 7.19a). The sexual swelling reaches its maximum size at ovulation. When females are not receptive, either because they are pregnant or are nursing, they do not display a sexual swelling (Figure 7.19b). Thus, the presence or absence of a sexual swelling signals a female\u2019s reproductive state.\r\n\r\nMonkeys and apes use diverse facial expressions in visual communication. Showing your teeth in a \u201csmile\u201d sends a signal of friendship in humans. Displaying teeth in this way is a sign of anxiety or fear in primates. That male mandrill you see \u201cyawning\u201d at your local zoo is actually displaying his teeth to signal tension or to threaten a rival (Figure 7.20a). In addition to showing their canines, male gelada baboons use \u201clip flips,\u201d in which the gums and teeth are exposed by flipping the upper lip up over the nostrils (Figure 7.20b), and \u201craised eyelids,\u201d in which the pale eyelids are exposed by pulling the scalp back as threatening gestures (Aich, Moos-Heilen, &amp; Zimmerman 1990). Submissive males respond by fleeing or presenting their hindquarters.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_207\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"597\"]<img class=\"wp-image-207\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.20-1.jpg\" alt=\"Adult male mandrill and adult male hamadryas baboon yawning.\" width=\"597\" height=\"310\" \/> Figure 7.20a-b: Males use visual displays to communicate with other males. The male mandrill (left) is yawning to display his canines, and the male gelada baboon (right) enhances the yawn by flipping his upper lip back and raising his eyelids. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/pxhere.com\/en\/photo\/559944\">Mandrill<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/with\/24639723420\/\">Mathias Appel<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>. b.<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:BabouinGeladaAuReveil.JPG\"> BabouinGeladaAuReveil<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:BluesyPete\"> BluesyPete<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_209\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"414\"]<img class=\"wp-image-208\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.22.jpg\" alt=\"A bald uakari. A spider monkey.\" width=\"414\" height=\"154\" \/> Figure 7.22a-b: Many monkey species have colourful faces, including the bald uakari (Cacajao calvus; left) and the white-bellied spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth) (right). Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Uakari.jpg\">Uakari<\/a> by Coada dragos has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. 6.22b <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ateles_belzebuth_(White-bellied_spider_monkey)_2.jpg\">Ateles belzebuth (White-bellied spider monkey) 2<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ewas-world\/\"> Ewa<\/a> (username: Ewcek65) has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"163\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-3.png\" alt=\"A male mandrill\u2019s face.\" width=\"163\" height=\"246\" \/> Figure 7.21: The colourful face of the male mandrill provides information about health and fitness to other mandrills.Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/24842082402\/\">Mandrill<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/with\/24639723420\/\">Mathias Appel<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nPrimates also communicate through colour. In female and male mandrills, facial colouration provides information about an individual\u2019s health, competitive ability, and reproductive state to conspecifics (Figure 7.21; Setchell &amp;t al. 2008; Setchell, Wickings, &amp; Knapp 2006). Variation in facial colouration among monkeys of Central and South America ranges from very simple (Figure 7.22a) to complex (Figure 7.22b). Species living with larger numbers of other primate species have evolved more complex facial colouration patterns, suggesting that this trait evolved as a form of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1098\"]species recognition[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or the ability to differentiate conspecifics from members of other species (Santana, Lynch Alfaro, &amp; Alfaro 2012).\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Olfactory Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All primates use scent to communicate. Females secrete chemicals from their <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1100\"]anogenital[\/pb_glossary] <\/strong>region (the area of the anus and genitals) that provide males with information about their reproductive state. In some species, like macaques and chimpanzees, this olfactory signal is enhanced by a sexual swelling, as discussed above. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1102\"]Olfactory communication[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or communicating through scent, is particularly important for monkeys of Central and South America, lemurs, and lorises. Male and female common squirrel monkeys (<em>Saimiri sciureus<\/em>) (Figure 7.23a) engage in \u201curine washing,\u201d in which an individual urinates on its hands and feet and then uses them to spread urine all over its body. Urine washing may be used to mark trails for others to follow, to control body temperature, as part of dominance displays, or to communicate reproductive state (Boinski 1992). During aggressive interactions with other males, male ring-tailed lemurs rub their tails with scent from glands on their wrists and chests. They use their \u201cperfumed\u201d tails in aggressive interactions with other males, who may respond by waiving their own scented tail, with physical aggression, or by fleeing (Jolly 1966). Males also waive their tails, saturated in scent, to attract females (Shirasu et al. 2020). Males use scent glands in their wrists to mark territorial boundaries (Figure 7.23b; Mertl-Millhollen 1988).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_210\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"641\"]<img class=\"wp-image-210\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.23.jpg\" alt=\"A squirrel monkey. A ring-tailed lemur.\" width=\"641\" height=\"332\" \/> Figure 7.23a-b: Some primates, like the common squirrel monkey (left) and the ring-tailed lemur (right), communicate using scent. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rubund\/6337874822\/\">Saimiri sciureus<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rubund\/\">Ruben Undheim<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lemur_catta_004.jpg\">Lemur catta 004<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Maky\">Maky<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tactile Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1104\"]Tactile communication[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or communicating through touch, is very important in all primate species. Physical contact is used to comfort and reassure, is part of courtship and mating, and is used to establish dominance and alliances. Grooming is an important and clearly enjoyable form of tactile communication for all primates (Figure 7.24). Not only does grooming serve to clean the skin and fur, removing parasites and debris, but it is an important affiliative behaviour that helps reinforce social bonds, repair relationships, and cement alliances.<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"674\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-8.png\" alt=\"Four primate species grooming.\" width=\"674\" height=\"478\" \/> Figure 7.24: Examples of grooming in Japanese macaques (upper left), tufted capuchins (Sapajus apella) (upper right), gelada baboons (lower left), and black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata; lower right). Credit: Examples of grooming original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Jaffe is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Yakushima_macaques_grooming_each_other.jpg\">Yakushima macaques grooming each other<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Grendelkhan\"> Grendelkhan<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tufted_capuchin_monkeys_grooming_session_III.jpg\">Tufted capuchin monkeys grooming session III<\/a> by Adrian Soldati, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>;<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Baboons_Wunania_012018.jpg\"> Baboons Wunania 012018<\/a> by Kim Toogood, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>;<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Black-and-white_ruffed_lemur_03.jpg\"> Black-and-white ruffed lemur 03<\/a> by Mattis2412, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/deed.en\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>].[\/caption]\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: Alarm Calls: Signals to Friends or Foes?<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alarm calls are common among group-living primates. They often serve to notify conspecifics of potential danger, as is the case with vervet monkeys. Research has shown that: (1) vervets classify predators based on hunting style; (2) alarm calls convey information to other vervets about that hunting style; and (3) other vervets respond in ways appropriate for evading that type of predator (Seyfarth, Cheney, &amp; Marler 1980a). When a vervet gives a \u201cleopard\u201d alarm call (directed at mammalian carnivores like leopards, Figure 7.25a), monkeys on the ground climb the nearest tree, while monkeys already in trees stay there or climb higher. Since most mammalian carnivores hunt on the ground, getting into, and staying in, a tree is the best option for escape. When the \u201csnake\u201d alarm call is given, vervets stand on their hind legs and look down at the ground (Figure 7.25b). Since snakes are not pursuit predators, locating them quickly so as to avoid them is the best strategy. Lastly, when an \u201ceagle\u201d alarm call is given, vervets look up or run into bushes, both of which are useful responses for avoiding hawks and eagles, which attack from above (Figure 7.25c). Vervets clearly understand the meaning of each type of alarm call, as they respond appropriately even when they do not see the actual predator (Seyfarth, Cheney, &amp; Marler 1980b). Such <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1106\"]semantic communication[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, which involves the systematic use of signals to refer to objects in the environment, was once believed to be unique to humans. It may be a precursor to the symbolic capacities of human language.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"482\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1.jpg\" alt=\"Primate in a tree views a leopard.\" width=\"482\" height=\"344\" \/> Figure 7.25a[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"484\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-2.jpg\" alt=\"Primate views snake on the ground.\" width=\"484\" height=\"338\" \/> Figure 7.25b[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"481\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-2.jpg\" alt=\"Primate on the ground sees bird.\" width=\"481\" height=\"517\" \/> Figure 7.25c\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Figure 7.25a-c: Vervet monkeys respond in different ways to alarm calls for each of their three main predators (leopards, snakes, and eagles) which are appropriate to predator hunting strategies. Credit: Vervet Monkey Alarm Calls by Mary Nelson, original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Research on other African monkeys indicates that some species use alarm calls to signal to the predator that it has been detected. Diana monkeys (<em>Cercopithecus diana<\/em>) give alarm calls to leopards (<em>Panthera pardus<\/em>) but not chimpanzees (Zuberb\u00fchler, No\u00eb, &amp; Seyfarth 1997). Because leopards are stealth predators, they rely on the element of surprise to sneak up on their prey (Figure 7.26a). Alarm calling at leopards appears to tell the leopard that it has been seen and therefore its chance of success will be low. Research shows leopards are more likely to stop hunting after an alarm call has been emitted. Unlike leopards, chimpanzees are pursuit predators and may even use alarm calls to locate potential prey (Figure 7.26b). With such a predator, prey are better off remaining as silent as possible so as not to alert the predator to their location (Zuberb\u00fchler Et al. 1999).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_215\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"1907\"]<img class=\"wp-image-215 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.26.jpg\" alt=\"Leopard crouches in grass. Chimpanzee looks up. \" width=\"1907\" height=\"589\" \/> Figure 7.26a-b: Because leopards (left) and chimpanzees (right) hunt differently, Diana monkeys react differently to them. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thimindu\/5842997328\">Crouching Leopard<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thimindu\/\"> Thimindu Goonatillake<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chimpanzee_in_the_wild.jpg\">Chimpanzee in the wild<\/a> by D.G. Kulakov is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The Question of Culture<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It may be surprising in a chapter on nonhuman primates to see a discussion of culture. After all, culture is considered by many, including cultural anthropologists, to be a distinguishing characteristic of humans. Indeed, some anthropologists question claims of culture in primates and other animals. Definitions of animal culture focus on specific behaviours that are unique to one population. Anthropological definitions of human culture emphasize shared ideology (e.g., values, morals, beliefs) and symbols, not just behaviour. Using this definition, some cultural anthropologists view primates as lacking culture because of the absence of symbolic life (e.g., religion). However, the longer we study primate groups and populations, the more insight we gain into primate behavioural variation. If we define <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1108\"]culture[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> as the transmission of behaviour from one generation to the next through social learning, then we must view at least some of the behavioural variation we see in primates as forms of <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1110\"]cultural tradition[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or a distinctive pattern of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group that persists over time (Whiten 2001).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chimpanzee Culture<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Due to both their high level of intelligence and the large number of long-term studies on several different populations, chimpanzees provide the best example of cultural tradition in primates. Chimpanzees express cultural variation in multiple behavioural patterns, ranging from population-specific prey preferences and hunting strategies to tool-use techniques and social behaviours. For example, in Tanzania, chimpanzees fish for termites by stripping twigs and then poking the twigs into termite mounds. The termites react to the \u201cinvasion\u201d by attacking the twig. The chimpanzee pulls the twig out, termites attached, and eats them. In Gambia, they use modified twigs to extract honey from holes in trees. In Fongoli, S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, chimpanzees use sticks as \u201cspears\u201d that they stab into tree cavities to hunt for galagos (Figure 7.27). Multiple chimpanzee populations use a \u201chammer and anvil\u201d to crack open nuts, but the specific techniques differ. Because the cultural traditions are so diverse and unique, if a researcher can observe enough of a chimpanzee\u2019s behaviour, it is possible to assign that individual to a specific community, much in the same way a human being can be associated with a specific culture based on his or her behaviour (Whiten 2011).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"800\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-4.jpg\" alt=\"Chimpanzees hunting galagos by poking them with a stick. \" width=\"800\" height=\"453\" \/> Figure 7.27a-d: Tool-assisted hunting by a chimpanzee at Fongoli, S\u00e9n\u00e9gal. An adult male chimpanzee uses a tree branch with a modified end to (a\u2013c) stab into a cavity within a hollow tree branch that houses a galago. He ultimately captures the galago as (d) his adolescent brother looks on. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Pan_troglodytes,_tool_use_in_Senegal.jpg\">Pan troglodytes, tool use in Senegal<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/content\/2\/4\/140507\"> J. D. Pruetz, P. Bertolani, K. Boyer Ontl, S. Lindshield, M. Shelley, and E. G. Wessling<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">How do chimpanzee cultures develop, and how does cultural transmission occur? Although we do not know for sure how chimpanzee cultural traditions develop initially, it is possible that different groups invent, either accidentally or deliberately, certain behaviours that other individuals copy. <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1112\"]Immigration[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong>, or movement of an individual into a new group or community, is an important avenue of cultural transmission in chimpanzees, much as it is between human cultures. Immigrants (typically females) may bring cultural traditions to their new community, which residents observe and learn. Conversely, immigrants may observe and learn a cultural tradition practiced in their new community (Whiten 2011).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural Transmission in Macaques<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Two monkey species are well-known for behavioural variation that has been called \u201cpre-cultural\u201d by some primatologists: Japanese macaques and tufted capuchins (<em>Sapajus apella<\/em>). The transmission of unique <strong>[pb_glossary id=\"1114\"]foraging[\/pb_glossary]<\/strong> (the act of searching for food) behaviours through the members of a provisioned group of Japanese macaques on Koshima Island is well known (Matsuzawa 2015). In an effort to keep the monkeys nearby, researchers provided them with piles of sweet potatoes. A juvenile female named Imo spontaneously washed a muddy sweet potato in a stream. This new food-processing technique first spread among other juveniles and then gradually to older individuals. Within 30 years, it had spread across generations, and 46 of 57 monkeys in the group engaged in the behaviour. Another example comes from a group living far to the north, in Shiga-Heights, Nagano Prefecture. Researchers used apples to entice Japanese macaques to the area. Within a few years, monkeys visited the area regularly and were observed playing with the water in the hot springs. Soon, they climbed into the hot springs and learned to immerse themselves to keep warm and reduce stress when not foraging (Figure 7.28; Matsuzawa 2018; Takeshita Et al. 2018; recall also our discussion of hot spring use as an example of analogous traits at the beginning of this chapter). These examples share several characteristics with human culture, including invention or modification of behaviour, transmission of behaviour between individuals, and the persistence of the behaviour across generations (McGrew 1998).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"477\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-4.png\" alt=\"Two monkeys in a hot spring.\" width=\"477\" height=\"292\" \/> Figure 7.28: Hot spring use by Japanese macaques is a culturally transmitted behaviour. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/peterthoeny\/32160301021\">Oooh, This Feels Sooo Good!<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/peterthoeny\/\">Peter Theony - Quality HD Photography<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n<h2>Cultural Connections and Contemporary Implications<\/h2>\r\nIt is apparent that the study of primates, whose similarities to humans are striking, allows anthropologists and scientists to better understand our evolutionary past and to view humanity through a biological lens. As we have seen, one of the most compelling insights from primatology is the presence of culture within primate groups. As archaeologists continue to uncover ancient tools used by early hominins, parallel behaviours can be observed in several primate species today. Orangutans use sticks to scratch their backs, gorillas use branches to test water depth, and chimpanzees \u201cfish\u201d for termites, demonstrating object modification and task-specific planning. Likewise, capuchin monkeys use stones to dig (Lima, 2024), while long-tailed macaques use them to crack open nuts or even mollusks. These practices show how primates repurpose objects to achieve desired outcomes. If culture is defined as information acquired through social learning, then these forms of tool use represent not only innovation but cultural transmission. Primate archaeology suggests that such knowledge may be passed down across generations, sometimes primarily through females; for example, stone tools dated to around 4,300 years ago from the Ta\u00ef Forest contain starch residues from nuts still processed by chimpanzees in the region today. Perhaps most striking is evidence of deliberate medicinal behaviour known as zoopharmacognosy across multiple primate species (De la Fuente, M.2022). Capuchins rub themselves with citrus fruits containing antibacterial compounds or with millipedes that act as insect repellents. Lactating female sifakas consume tannin-rich plants with antiparasitic properties, and chimpanzees chew bitter pith to treat parasite-related illnesses. These behaviours suggest that many cultural abilities observed in early humans were not sudden innovations but rather developments rooted in cognitive and social capacities, as observed in primates today.\r\n<h4>Discussion Questions<\/h4>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>We've learned about how primates interact socially (affiliative\/agonistic), but what about humans? Would you say these interactions are culturally dependent? Suggest explanations.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Do you believe that our biological makeup influences particular humans' cultural abilities? Explain.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are socially complex, extremely intelligent, and highly adaptable. In this chapter we discussed aspects of primate ecology, including how body size and characteristics of food affect what primates eat and how primates interact with other species in their environment. We examined why primates live in groups, the types of groups in which they are found, and the reproductive strategies used by males and females to maximize reproductive success. Like other aspects of their behaviour, primate communication is varied and complex, and we discussed how primates communicate using vocal, visual, olfactory, and tactile signals. Finally, we explored the question of culture among nonhuman primates and learned that some species have cultural traditions, distinctive patterns of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group that persist over time. Humans and other primates are similar in many ways. Learning about principles of primate ecology and behaviour can help us better understand our own behaviour and the behaviours of our extinct relatives.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">If anthropology is the study of humans, why do some anthropologists study primates?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">How does a primate\u2019s ecology affect their diet and interactions with other organisms?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Why do primates live in groups and in what types of groups do they live?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is parental investment and sexual selection?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">What are some examples of primate communication?<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is the evidence for cultural traditions in primates and how do primatologists think cultural transmission occurs in primates?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Abundance<\/strong>: How much food is available in a given area.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Adaptation<\/strong>: A trait with a function.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Affiliative<\/strong>: Nonaggressive social interactions and associations between individuals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agonistic<\/strong>: Conflict; aggressive interactions between individuals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Alarm calling<\/strong>: Vocalizations emitted by social animals in response to danger.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Analogy<\/strong>: A similar trait found in different species that arose independently.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anogenital<\/strong>: Relating to the anus and genitals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Breeding season<\/strong>: The time of year when females are receptive to mating.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Callitrichids<\/strong>: The primate family that includes marmosets and tamarins.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carnivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of animal tissue.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Coalition<\/strong>: A temporary alliance between individuals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Community ecology<\/strong>: The branch of ecology that deals with the relationships and interactions between different organisms that occupy the same habitat.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Comparison<\/strong>: An examination of the similarities and differences between two things, such as two primate species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Conspecifics<\/strong>: Members of the same species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cooperative breeding<\/strong>: When individuals other than the mother and father help raise the offspring.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Crypsis<\/strong>: The ability to avoid detection by other organisms, such as predators.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural tradition<\/strong>: A distinctive pattern of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group, which persists over time and is acquired through social learning.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong>: The transmission of behaviour from one generation to the next through observation and imitation.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Decolonize<\/strong>: Understanding and highlighting the theory and research of non-Western individuals and perspectives.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Descendant<\/strong>: A species that comes after the ancestor species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Direct competition:<\/strong> Competition that involves physical interaction between individuals, such as fighting.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dispersal<\/strong>: To leave one\u2019s group or area. This may or may not involve joining another group.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Distribution<\/strong>: How food is spread out.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diurnal<\/strong>: Active during the day.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominance hierarchy<\/strong>: The ranked organization of individuals established by the outcome of aggressive-submissive interactions.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominant<\/strong>: Being of high rank.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ecology<\/strong>: The relationship between organisms and their physical surroundings.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ecotourism<\/strong>: A form of tourism that focuses on nature-based attractions to provide learning opportunities and that uses economically and ecologically sustainable practices.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethology<\/strong>: The study of animal behaviour.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fission-fusion<\/strong>: Societies in which group composition is flexible, such as chimpanzee and spider monkey societies. Individuals may break up into smaller feeding groups (fission) and combine into larger groups (fusion).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fitness<\/strong>: An individual\u2019s ability to survive and reproduce relative to other members of the same species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Folivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of leaves.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraging<\/strong>: The act of searching for food.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Frugivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of fruit.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grooming<\/strong>: Picking through the fur of another individual for cleaning or bonding purposes.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterospecifics<\/strong>: Members of different species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Holism<\/strong>: The idea that the parts of a system interconnect and interact to make up the whole.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Home range<\/strong>: The area that a group or individual uses over a given period of time (often over a year).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homology<\/strong>: A similar trait found in different species because it was inherited from a common ancestor.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Immigration<\/strong>: Movement of an individual into a new group or community.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Indirect competition<\/strong>: Competition that does not involve physical interaction between individuals, such as eating food before another individual arrives at the food site.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Infanticide<\/strong>: The killing of infants of one\u2019s own species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Innate<\/strong>: Natural; as in behaviour that comes naturally.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insectivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diets consist primarily of insects.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interbirth interval<\/strong>: The typical length of time between one birth and the next for a species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Intersexual selection<\/strong>: The selection for traits that enhance the ability of the members of one sex to attract the attention of the other.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Intrasexual selection<\/strong>: Selection for traits that enhance the ability of members of one sex to compete amongst themselves.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mating system<\/strong>: A way of describing which male(s) and female(s) mate.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Metabolism<\/strong>: The chemical changes that take place in an organism that turn nutrients into energy.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mobbing<\/strong>: Cooperatively attacking or harassing a predator.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monogamy<\/strong>: A mating system in which one male mates with one female.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Multi-male, multi-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of multiple adult males, multiple adult females, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Multi-male, single-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of two or more adult males, one breeding female, their dependent offspring, and non-breeding females.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutualistic\/mutualism<\/strong>: When different species work together, with each benefiting from the interaction.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Niche<\/strong>: The role of a species in its environment; how it meets its needs for food, shelter, etc.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nocturnal<\/strong>: Active at night.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Olfactory communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through scent.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Omnivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists of plant and animal matter.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pair bond<\/strong>: A strong, long-term relationship between two individuals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parasite<\/strong>: An organism that lives in or on another organism.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parental investment<\/strong>: Any time or energy a parent devotes to the current offspring that enhances its survival (and eventual reproductive success) at the expense of the parent\u2019s ability to invest in the next offspring.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Philopatric<\/strong>: Remaining in the group of one\u2019s birth.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Piloerection<\/strong>: Raising one\u2019s hair or fur in an effort to look bigger.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polyandry<\/strong>: A mating system in which multiple males mate with a single breeding female.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygamy<\/strong>: A mating system in which multiple males mate with multiple females.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygyny<\/strong>: A mating system in which one male mates with multiple females.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polyspecific association<\/strong>: An association between two or more different species that involves behavioural changes in at least one of them to maintain the association.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primate community<\/strong>: All primate species that occur in an area.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primatologist<\/strong>: A scientist who studies primate behaviour and\/or ecology.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primatology<\/strong>: The scientific field that studies primate behaviour and\/or ecology.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ranging behaviour<\/strong>: Refers to the way in which animals move about their environment.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Receptive<\/strong>: A term used to describe females who are ready for sexual reproduction (i.e., not pregnant or nursing).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Reproductive success<\/strong>: An individual\u2019s genetic contribution to future generations, often measured through the number of offspring produced.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Reproductive suppression<\/strong>: The prevention or inhibition of reproduction of healthy adults.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Resident male<\/strong>: Term that describes the male who lives with a group of females.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Seed dispersal<\/strong>: The process by which seeds move away from the plant that produced them in preparation for germination and becoming a new plant.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Semantic communication<\/strong>: The systematic use of signals to refer to objects in the environment.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual dimorphism<\/strong>: When males and females of a species have different morphological traits.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual selection<\/strong>: The selection for traits that increase mating success. This occurs via intersexual selection and intrasexual selection.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual swelling<\/strong>: Area of the hindquarters that change in size, shape, and often colour over the course of a female\u2019s reproductive cycle, reaching maximum size at ovulation. Occurs in many primate species that live in Africa and Asia.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexually monomorphic<\/strong>: When males and females of a species have similar morphological traits.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Single-male, multi-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of one adult male, multiple adult female, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Single-male, single-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of one adult male, one adult female, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social learning<\/strong>: The idea that new behaviours can be acquired by observing and imitating others.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social system<\/strong>: A way of describing the typical number of males and females of all age classes that live together.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social transmission<\/strong>: Transfer of something from one individual to another; this can include parasites, information, or cultural traditions.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sociality<\/strong>: The tendency to form social groups.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Solitary<\/strong>: Living alone.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species recognition<\/strong>: The ability to differentiate conspecifics from members of other species.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Subordinate<\/strong>: Being of low rank.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tactile communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through touch.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Territory:<\/strong> A home range whose boundary is defended from intrusion by conspecifics.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vertebrates<\/strong>: The group of animals characterized by an internal spinal column or backbone. This includes fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vigilance<\/strong>: Watchful behaviour used to detect potential danger, usually in the form of predators or potential competitors.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Visual communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through signals that can be seen.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vocal communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through signals that can be heard.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Goodall, Jane. 1971. <em>In the Shadow of Man<\/em>. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rowe, Noel, and Marc Myers, eds. 2016. <em>All the World\u2019s Primates. <\/em>Charleston, RI: Pogonias Press.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Strier, Karen B. 2017. <em>Primate Behavioural Ecology.<\/em> 5th ed. New York: Routledge.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pin.primate.wisc.edu\/\">Primate Info Net<\/a> is an information service of the National Primate Research Center at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. It includes Primate Factsheets, primate news and publications, a list of primate-related jobs, and an international directory of primatology, among other information.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.primate-sg.org\/\">Primate Specialist Group<\/a> is a collection of scientists and conservationists who work in dozens of African, Asian, and Latin American nations to promote research on primate conservation.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short videos of some primate behaviours discussed in this chapter:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch vervet monkeys respond to different types of predators: BBC One. n.d. \u201cVervet Monkey\u2019s Escape Plans - Talk to the Animals: Episode 2 Preview.\u201d Accessed December 16, 2022. <a class=\"rId10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=q8ZG8Dpc8mM\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=q8ZG8Dpc8mM. <\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch male gelada baboons use the lip flip in competition with other males: Smithsonian Channel, June 9, 2017. \u201cWhy These Vegetarian Monkeys Have Sharp Predator Teeth.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?time_continue=145&amp;v=aC6iYj_EBjY\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?time_continue=145&amp;v=aC6iYj_EBjY<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch (and listen to!) howler monkeys \u201croar\u201d: Science News. N.d. \u201cHear a Male Howler Monkey Roar.\u201d Accessed November 21, 2022. <a class=\"rId12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PYar0dkZ6v8\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PYar0dkZ6v8<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch Japanese macaques using natural hot springs: National Geographic. N.d. \u201cMeditative Snow Monkeys Hang Out in Hot Springs.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Aat9O85ynsI\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Aat9O85ynsI<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch chimpanzees make and use tools: National Geographic. n.d. \u201cChimps and Tools.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o2TBicMRLtA\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o2TBicMRLtA<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Aich, H., R. Moos-Heilen, and E. Zimmermann. 1990. \u201cVocalizations of Adult Gelada Baboons (<em>Theropithecus gelada<\/em>): Acoustic Structure and Behavioural Context.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 55 (3\u20134): 109\u2013132.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bell, Sarah A. 2017. \u201cGaldikas, Birute.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 445\u2013446. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Boinski, S. 1992. \u201cOlfactory Communication among Costa Rican Squirrel Monkeys: A Field Study.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 59 (3): 127\u2013136.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cheney, D. L., and R. M. Seyfarth. 1987. \u201cThe Influence of Intergroup Competition on the Survival and Reproduction of Female Vervet Monkeys.\u201d <em>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology<\/em> 21 (6): 375\u2013386.<\/p>\r\nDe la Fuente, M. F., Souto, A., Albuquerque, U. P., &amp; Schiel, N. (2022). Self\u2010medication in nonhuman primates: A systematic evaluation of the possible function of the use of medicinal plants. <em>American Journal of Primatology,<\/em> 84, e23438. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajp.23438\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajp.23438<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">de Oliveira Terceiro, Francisco Edvaldo, and Judith M. Burkart. 2019. \u201cCooperative Breeding.\u201d In <em>Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior<\/em>, edited by Jennifer Vonk and Todd Shackelford, 1\u20136. Edinburg, Scotland: Springer Cham.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Digby, Leslie J., Stephen F. Ferrari, and Wendy Saltzman. 2011. \u201cCallitrichines: The Role of Competition in Cooperatively Breeding Species.\u201d In <em>Primates in Perspective<\/em>, edited by Christina J. Campbell, August\u00cdn Fuentes, Katherine C. MacKinnon, Simon K. Bearder, and Rebecca M. Stumpf, 91\u201310. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fischer, Julia, Kurt Hammerschmidt, Dorothy L. Cheney, and Robert M. Seyfarth. 2008. \u201cAcoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks.\u201d <em>Ethology<\/em> 107 (1): 33\u201354.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jolly, Alison. 1966. <em>Lemur Behavior: A Madagascar Field Study<\/em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Krief, Sabrina, Claude Marcel Hladik, and Claudie Haxaire. 2005. \u201cEthnomedicinal and Bioactive Properties of Plants Ingested by Wild Chimpanzees in Uganda.\u201d <em>Journal of Ethnopharmacology<\/em> 110 (1\u20133): 1\u201315.<\/p>\r\nLima, <a href=\"https:\/\/concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org\/search?queryString=au%3D%22Lima%2C%20Geovana%20C%20B%22&amp;databaseList=&amp;idDetect=false&amp;citeDetect=false&amp;clusterResults=true&amp;groupVariantRecords=false&amp;newsArticles=off&amp;bookReviews=off\" target=\"_self\">Geovana C B <\/a>et al. (2024) <a href=\"https:\/\/concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org\/search\/detail\/10280646190?queryString=stone%20tool%20use%20in%20Capuchin%20monkeys&amp;databaseList=\">A new addition to the toolbox: <strong>stone tool use<\/strong> in blonde\u00a0<strong>capuchin<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>monkey<\/strong><strong>s<\/strong>\u00a0(Sapajus flavius). <em>Primates; journal of primatology\u00a0 <\/em>65(5) (202409): 383-389.<\/a>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Maekawa, Mkio, Annette Lanjouw, Eug\u00e8ne Rutagarama, and Doublas Sharp. 2013. \u201cMountain Gorilla Tourism Generating Wealth and Peace in Post-Conflict Rwanda.\u201d <em>Natural Resources Forum<\/em> 37 (2): 127\u2013137.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Matsuzawa, Tetsuro. 2015. \u201cSweet-Potato Washing Revisited: 50th Anniversary of the <em>Primates<\/em> Article.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 56: 285\u2013287.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Matsuzawa, Tetsuro. 2018. \u201cHot-Spring Bathing of Wild Monkeys in Shiga-Heights: Origin and Propagation of a Cultural Behavior.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 59: 209\u2013213.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">McGrew, W. C. 1998. \u201cCulture in Nonhuman Primates?\u201d <em>Annual Review of Anthropology<\/em> 27: 301\u2013328.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mertl-Millhollen, Anne S. 1988. \u201cOlfactory Demarcation of Territorial but Not Home Range Boundaries by <em>Lemur catta<\/em>.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 50 (3\u20134): 175\u2013187.<\/p>\r\nMercader J, et al. (2007) \u00a0\u00a04,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. <em>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S<\/em> A. Feb 27;104(9):3043-8. doi: 10.1073\/pnas.0607909104. Epub 2007 Feb 20. PMID: 17360606; PMCID: PMC1805589.\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pinacho-Guendulain, B., and G. Ramos-Fern\u00e1ndez. 2017. \u201cInfluence of Fruit Availability on the Fission-Fusion Dynamics of Spider Monkeys (<em>Ateles geoffroyi<\/em>).\u201d <em>International Journal of Primatology<\/em> 38: 466\u2013484.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Poirotte, Cl\u00e9mence, Fran\u00e7ois Massol, Ana\u00efs Herbert, Eric Willaume, Pacelle M. Bomo, Peter M. Kappeler, and Marie J. E. Charpentier. 2017. \u201cMandrills Use Olfaction to Socially Avoid Parasitized Conspicifics.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 3 (4): e160172.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rodrigues, Michelle. 2019. \u201cIt\u2019s Time to Stop Lionizing Dian Fossey as a Conservation Hero.\u201d <em>Lady Science<\/em> website, September 20. Accessed December 14, 2022. <a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ladyscience.com\/ideas\/time-to-stop-lionizing-dian-fossey-conservation\">https:\/\/www.ladyscience.com\/ideas\/time-to-stop-lionizing-dian-fossey-conservation<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Samuni, Liran, Anna Preis, Tobias Deschner, Catherine Crockford, and Roman M. Wittig. 2018. \u201cReward of Labor Coordination and Hunting Success in Wild Chimpanzees.\u201d <em>Communications Biology<\/em> 1: 138.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Santana, Sharlene E., Jessica Lynch Alfaro, and Michael E. Alfaro. 2012. \u201cAdaptive Evolution of Facial Colour Patterns in Neotropical Primates.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 279 (1736): 2204\u20132211.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sanz, Crickette M., David Strait, Crepin Eyana Ayina, Jean Marie Massamba, Thierry Fabrice Ebombi, Severin Ndassoba Kialiema, Delon Ngoteni, et al. 2022. \u201cInterspecific Interactions Between Sympatric Apes.\u201d i<em>Science<\/em> 25 (10): 105059.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sch\u00f6n Ybarra, M. A. 1986. \u201cLoud Calls of Adult Male Red Howling Monkeys (<em>Alouatta seniculus<\/em>).\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 47 (4): 204\u2013216.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Setchell, Joanna M., Tessa Smith, E. Jean Wickings, and Leslie A. Knapp. 2008. \u201cSocial Correlates of Testosterone and Ornamentation in Male Mandrills.\u201d <em>Hormones and Behavior<\/em> 54 (3): 365\u2013372.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Setchell, Joanna M., E. Jean Wickings, and Leslie A. Knapp. 2006. \u201cSignal Content of Red Facial Coloration in Female Mandrills (<em>Mandrillus sphinx<\/em>).\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em><a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/paperpile.com\/b\/Gb7Zko\/Lxpl\"> 273 (1599): 2395\u20132400.<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Seyfarth, R. M., D. L. Cheney, and P. Marler. 1980a. \u201cMonkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 210 (4471): 801\u2013803.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney, and Peter Marler. 1980b. \u201cVervet Monkey Alarm Calls: Semantic Communication in a Free-Ranging Primate.\u201d <em>Animal Behaviour<\/em> 28 (4): 1070\u20131094.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sharma, Goutam, Chan Ram, and Lal Singh Rajpurohit. 2010. \u201cA Case Study of Infantcide After Resident Male Replacement in <em>Semnopithecus entellus<\/em> around Jodhpur (India).\u201d <em>Proceeding of the Zoological Society<\/em> 63 (2): 93\u201398.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Shirasu, Mika, Satomi Ito, Akihiro Itoigawa, Takashi Hayakawa, Kodzue Kinoshita, Isao Munechika, Hiroo Imai, and Kazushige Touhara. 2020. \u201cKey Male Glandular Odorants Attracting Female Ring-Tailed Lemurs.\u201d <em>Current Biology<\/em> 30 (11): 2131\u20132138.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stanford, Craig B. 2017. \u201cGoodall, Jane.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 471\u2013472. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stewart, Kelly. 2017. \u201cFossey, Dian.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 432\u2013433. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Takeshita, Rafaela S.C., Fred B. Bercovitch, Kodzue Kinoshita, and Michael A. Huffman. 2018. \u201cBeneficial Effect of Hot Spring Bathing on Stress Levels in Japanese Macaques.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 59 (3): 215\u2013225.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trivers, Robert L. 1972. \u201cParental Investment and Sexual Selection.\u201d In <em>Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871\u20131971<\/em>, edited by Bernard Campbell, 136\u2013179. Chicago: Aldine.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Whiten, Andrew. 2011. \u201cThe Scope of Culture in Chimpanzees, Humans and Ancestral Apes.\u201d <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 366 (1567): 997\u20131007.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wiens, Frank, and Annette Zitzmann. 2003. \u201cSocial Structure of the Solitary Slow Loris <em>Nycticebus coucang<\/em> (Lorisidae).\u201d <em>Journal of Zoology<\/em> 261 (1): 35\u201346.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zuberb\u00fchler, Klaus, David Jenny, and Redouan Bshary. 1999. \u201cThe Predator Deterrence Function of Primate Alarm Calls.\u201d <em>Ethology<\/em> 105 (6): 477\u2013490.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zuberb\u00fchler, Klaus, Ronald No\u00eb, and Robert M. Seyfarth. 1997. \u201cDiana Monkey Long-Distance Calls: Messages for Conspecifics and Predators.\u201d <em>Animal Behaviour<\/em> 53 (3): 589\u2013604.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Acknowledgements<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The author is grateful to the editors for the opportunity to contribute to this open-source textbook. She thanks Dr. Stephanie Etting for her encouragement and support during the revision of this chapter. Her suggestions, along with comments made by two anonymous reviewers on an earlier draft of this chapter, improved the final version considerably. Finally, she thanks all the primatologists who came before her, especially her advisor, Lynne A. Isbell, for their tireless efforts to understand the behavior and ecology of the living primates. Without their work, this chapter would not have been possible.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<p>Learn more about <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/about-the-authors\/\">authors and editors<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/student-contributors\/\"> Hess&#8217; student contributions<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/back-matter\/versioning-history\/\">versioning history<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the variables that affect primate diets.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how primates interact with other organisms in their environment.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss why primates live in groups, types of primate groups, and components of their social systems.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the reproductive strategies of males and females.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain the ways in which primates communicate.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss the evidence for primate cultural traditions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nonhuman primates (hereafter, &#8216;primates&#8217;) are a fascinating group of animals, whose similarity to humans can be striking. Because of this similarity, studying primates helps anthropologists to gain insight into how our human ancestors may have behaved. It also allows us to better understand our own behaviour through <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_928\">comparison<\/a><\/strong> (examining similarities and differences) with other primates as well as by comparing different species of primates to one another. In this way, studying primates helps anthropologists comprehend humanity from a biological perspective, which contributes to anthropology\u2019s commitment to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_930\">holism,<\/a><\/strong> the idea that the parts of a system interconnect and interact to make up the whole.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 242px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/05\/image3.png\" alt=\"A person using binoculars to look at monkeys.\" width=\"242\" height=\"354\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.1: The author observing patas monkeys from a distance in Laikipia, Kenya. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Karin Enstam Jaffe observing patas monkeys in Laikipia, Kenya (Figure 6.5)<\/a> by Rebecca Chancellor is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_932\">Ethology<\/a> <\/strong>is the study of animal behaviour, while <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_934\">primatology <\/a><\/strong>is the study of primate behaviour. People who study primates are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_936\">primatologists<\/a><\/strong>. Research on primates can be conducted in the field (i.e., on wild primates) or in captivity (i.e., zoos) and may or may not involve experiments, such as playing recorded alarm calls to see how individuals react. Unlike some other Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields, primatology has a long history of research conducted by women (see \u201cSpecial Topic: Women in Primatology\u201d). Primatologists come from many different disciplines, have diverse backgrounds, and study primates for different reasons. Biologists study primates as examples of evolutionary theories like natural selection, and to understand behaviours as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_938\">adaptations<\/a><\/strong>, or traits with a function that increases <strong>fitness<\/strong>, i.e. an individual\u2019s survival and\/or reproduction. Primate intelligence is of interest to psychologists who want to learn more about deception or cooperation and to linguists interested in the principles of communication and language. Ecologists consider how primates interact with the habitats they occupy, and conservationists examine how primates are affected by deforestation, poaching, or illegal animal trade (see Appendix B: Primate Conservation for more information on these topics). Biological anthropologists, like myself (Figure 7.1), who study primates are interested in learning about their social complexity, and ecological and behavioural variation, to better understand the biological basis of human behaviour. And, similar to biologists, we also explore how primate behaviour is adaptive and contributes to individual fitness. Like other sciences, primatology is only as strong as its researchers, methods, and theories, and the field has benefitted recently from efforts to increase diversity and reckon with its colonialist past, as discussed below in \u201cSpecial Topic: Women in Primatology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Humans share many traits in common with primates. As you learned in Chapter 5, some of these traits are similar due to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_944\">homology<\/a><\/strong>, traits both species inherited from a common primate ancestor. For example, like most other primates, humans are social animals who live in groups. Group living did not evolve independently in humans and other primates. Rather, group living is a trait that evolved in a primate ancestor, and because it benefited survival, it was retained in the species\u2019 <strong>descendants<\/strong> (or the species that come after the ancestor species). In contrast, humans and other primates can have similar traits that evolved independently, which is called <strong>analogy<\/strong>. For example, both humans and Japanese macaques (<em>Macaca fuscata<\/em>) use natural hot springs (Figures 7.2a &amp; b). Research on these monkeys indicates that sitting in hot springs reduces stress and helps keep them warm, much as it does for humans (Takeshita Et al. 2018). But this behaviour is not the result of humans and Japanese macaques having a shared ancestor who used hot springs. Rather, the behaviour arose independently in two species that both occupy northerly environments and adapted to cold climates using a similar behaviour. Studying the homologous traits we share with other primates, like living in groups, helps us develop hypotheses about human behaviours as adaptations, which in turn helps us develop models for the behaviour of our human ancestors. Studying analogous traits, like hot springs use, allows us to better understand the effects of ecological variables on morphology and behaviour of both primates and humans, living and extinct.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_191\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-191\" style=\"width: 2161px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-189 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.2.jpg\" alt=\"Left, a man in a hot spring. Right, monkeys in a hot spring.\" width=\"2161\" height=\"803\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-191\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.2a\/b: Both humans (left) and Japanese macaques (right) use natural hot springs to reduce stress and relax. This similar trait arose independently in the two species, making it a good example of analogy. Credit: 7.2a. <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/hot-spring-landscape-man-mountain-1846721\/\">Hot Spring Landscape<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/pexels-2286921\/?utm_source=link-attribution&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=image&amp;utm_content=1846721\">Pexels<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a> under a <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>. 7.2b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Jigokudani_hotspring_in_Nagano_Japan_001.jpg\">Jigokudani hotspring in Nagano Japan 001<\/a> by Yosemite is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Women in Primatology<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While many STEM fields have traditionally been, and continue to be, dominated by men, primatology has a long history of significant research conducted by women. This is due, in part, to the fact that three of the most well-known primatologists are women. In the early 1960s, British paleoanthropologist Louis Leakey (discussed in Chapters 9 and 10) was looking for students to study the great apes in hopes of shedding light on the behaviours of our early ancestors. He chose Jane Goodall (Figure 7.3a) to study chimpanzees (<em>Pan troglodytes<\/em>), Birute Galdikas (Figure 7.3b) to study Bornean orangutans (<em>Pongo pygmaeus<\/em>), and Dian Fossey (Figure 7.3c) to study mountain gorillas (<em>Gorilla<\/em><em> beringei beringei<\/em>). The work of these three women, sometimes referred to as Leakey\u2019s \u201cTrimates,\u201d has transformed our understanding of ape (and primate) behaviour.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_190\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-190\" style=\"width: 626px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-190\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.3-1.jpg\" alt=\"Jane Goodall, Birute Galdikas, and Dian Fossey.\" width=\"626\" height=\"209\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-190\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.3a-c: Louis Leakey\u2019s \u201cTrimates\u201d (left to right): a. Jane Goodall\u2019s research on the Gombe chimpanzees spans over half a century; b. Birute Galdikas\u2019s research and rescue work on behalf of orangutans spans 40 years; c. Dian Fossey studied mountain gorillas in Rwanda for almost 20 years, until her murder in 1985. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Jane_Goodall_HK.jpg\">Jane Goodall HK<\/a> by Jeekc has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dr_Birute_Galdikas.jpg\">Dr Birute Galdikas<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/sfupamr\/\"> Simon Fraser University &#8211; University Communications<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>. c. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mary-lynn\/2925879356\">US-223658 Dian Fossey<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mary-lynn\/2925879356\/\"> Mary-Lynn<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Arriving at the Gombe Stream Reserve in Tanzania in 1960, Jane Goodall was one of the first scientists to conduct a long-term study of wild nonhuman primates. Before then, most studies lasted less than a year and were often zoo-based. By 1961, she had made two astounding observations that forced us to reconsider what differentiates humans from the rest of the primate order. She observed chimpanzees eating a colobus monkey, the first reported evidence of meat eating in our closest relatives; later observing them hunting and sharing meat. And she discovered that chimpanzees make and use tools by stripping leaves off twigs to \u201cfish\u201d for termites. Her work, spanning several decades, has produced long-term data on chimpanzee mating strategies, mother-infant bonds, and aggression. In the mid-1980s, Goodall transitioned from field researcher to conservationist and activist, advocating for the humane use of nonhuman animals (Stanford 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Birute Galdikas began her study of orangutans in Kalimantan, Borneo, in 1971. Hers was the first long-term study conducted on the Bornean orangutan. Galdikas and her colleagues have collected over 150,000 hours of observational data, focusing on the life histories of individual orangutans. While conducting behavioural research, Galdikas discovered that the pet trade and habitat loss were adversely affecting the orangutan population. Eventually, Galdikas\u2019s conservation efforts began to extend beyond advocacy and into rehabilitation and forest preservation (Bell 2017). If you would like to learn more about primate conservation efforts, please see Appendix B: Primate Conservation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1967, Dian Fossey began her long-term study of mountain gorillas and founded the Karisoke Research Centre in Rwanda. Her and her colleagues\u2019 research, over several decades, revealed much about gorilla social behaviour, ecology, and life history. Her efforts also led to the development of mountain gorilla conservation programs. However, she was a controversial figure, as discussed below. Fossey was murdered in December 1985; the case remains unsolved (Stewart 2017).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Decolonizing Primatology<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recently, the movement to <strong>decolonize<\/strong> primatology, by understanding and highlighting the theories and research of non-Western individuals and perspectives, has gathered steam. This movement draws attention to the maltreatment of local people by Western primatologists. For example, Michelle Rodrigues (2019) argues that it&#8217;s time we stop focusing on the scientific and conservation contributions of Dian Fossey and acknowledge that her &#8220;active conservation&#8221; techniques included kidnapping and torturing local Rwandans who were known as, or suspected to be, gorilla poachers. Rodrigues (2019) argues:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The image of Fossey, a white American woman, whipping and torturing black African poachers is evocative of the behaviour of white slaveholders in the American South. It is appalling enough to think of that behaviour occurring in the 1850s; there is no way we can explain Fossey\u2019s behaviour in the 1970s as the product of \u201ca different time.\u201d Yet, almost three decades later, the romantic notion of a noble martyr who died for her devotion to gorillas prevails, and these terrifying actions are often described as simply unorthodox methods. Perhaps these truths are softened due to fears that the reality of this legacy would harm gorilla conservation efforts. But memorializing her as a martyr and patron saint of gorilla conservation demands that we forget the cruel acts she advocated for and performed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Further, Louis Leakey\u2019s installment of Goodall, Galdikas, and Fossey to study chimpanzees, orangutans, and mountain gorillas, respectively, is itself viewed as recapitulating the colonial legacy in Africa and Asia. Given that Leakey was the offspring of British missionaries, Rodrigues (2019) argues, it is no accident that he was willing to mentor British and American women, while overlooking women from Africa and Asia as potential researchers. This leads us to another level of the decolonizing movement, which aims to highlight the research of non-Western primatologists, particularly those living in what primatologists refer to as \u201chabitat countries\u201d that are home to living primates. As you will see in this chapter, scientists from diverse backgrounds are active contributors to exciting research on primates around the world.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Ecology<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The more than 600 species and subspecies of living primates are highly diverse in their dietary preferences and the habitats they occupy. In this section we\u2019ll briefly discuss aspects of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_950\">ecology<\/a><\/strong>, or the relationship between organisms and their physical surroundings, that impact a primate\u2019s life, the foods they eat, and the other species with whom they interact.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primate Diets<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Diet may be the most important variable influencing variation in primate morphology, behaviour, and ecology. Most primates are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_952\">omnivores<\/a><\/strong> who ingest a variety of foods in order to obtain appropriate levels of protein, carbohydrates, fats, and fluids, but one type of food often makes up the majority of each species\u2019 diet. You learned about the dental and digestive adaptations of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_954\">frugivores<\/a><\/strong> (who feed primarily on fruit), <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_956\">folivores<\/a><\/strong> (whose diet consists mostly of leaves), and <strong>insectivores <\/strong>(who eat mainly insects) in Chapter 6, so we will not discuss them again here.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Body Size and Diet<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure id=\"attachment_191-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-191-2\" style=\"width: 559px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-191\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.4-1.jpg\" alt=\"A tarsier eats a grasshopper. A gorilla eats leaves.\" width=\"559\" height=\"237\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-191-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.4a-b: Primates eat different types of food. Small primates, like the spectral tarsier (left), eat mostly insects while large primates, like the mountain gorilla (right), eat mostly leaves. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_tarsier_(7911549768).jpg\">Spectral Tarsier Tarsius tarsier (7911549768)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\"> Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mountain_gorilla_(Gorilla_beringei_beringei)_eating.jpg\">Mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) eating<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sharpphotography.co.uk\/\"> Charles J Sharp<\/a> (creator QS:P170,Q54800218) has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Insects are a high-quality food, full of easily digestible protein and high in calories that meet most of a primate\u2019s dietary needs. Although all primates will eat insects if they come upon them, those species that rely most heavily on insects tend to be the smallest. Why? Because larger primates simply cannot capture and consume enough insects every day to survive. Because of their small size (less than 150 g), spectral tarsiers (<em>Tarsius spectrum<\/em>) have a fast <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_960\">metabolism<\/a><\/strong>, which means they turn food to energy quickly, but they do not need to consume large amounts of food each day. It does not matter to a spectral tarsier that a grasshopper only weighs 300 mg, because the tarsier (<em>Tarsius<\/em>) itself is so small that one grasshopper is a good-size meal (Figure 7.4a). That same grasshopper is not even a snack for an adult male mountain gorilla (<em>Gorilla beringei beringei<\/em>), who may weigh up to 200 kg. Fortunately for gorillas (<em>Gorilla)<\/em>, their large body size means they have a slow metabolism, converting food into energy much more slowly, so they can eat lower quality food that takes longer to digest, provided there is a lot of it. For gorillas, leaves, which are hard to digest but plentiful, fit the bill (Figure 7.4b). Most medium-sized primates are highly frugivorous, and supplement their fruit based diet in ways that correspond with their size: Smaller frugivores tend to supplement with insects, while larger frugivores tend to supplement with leaves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Food Abundance and Distribution<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nutrients are not the only dietary considerations primates must make. They must also ensure that they consume more calories than they use. The abundance and distribution of food affect energy expenditure and calorie intake because they determine how far animals must travel in search of food and how much they must compete to obtain it. <strong>Abundance <\/strong>refers to how much food is available in a given area while <strong>distribution<\/strong> refers to how food is spread out. In terms of abundance, food is either plentiful or scarce (Figure 7.5a\u2013b). Food is distributed in one of three ways: uniformly (Figure 7.6a), in clumps (Figure 7.6b), or randomly (Figure 7.6c). In general, higher-quality foods, like fruit and insects, are less abundant and have patchier distributions than lower-quality foods, like leaves. Primates who eat fruit or insects usually have to travel farther to find food and burn more calories in the process. Abundance and distribution of food is another reason why larger primates tend to rely more heavily on leaves than either fruit or insects.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 619px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-2.png\" alt=\"Two squares with different amounts of dots.\" width=\"619\" height=\"286\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.5a-b: Two types of food abundance. Food is plentiful when there is a lot of it in a given area (left). Food is scarce when there is not very much of it in a given area (right). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Food abundance and food scarcity (Figure 6.7)<\/a> by Karin Enstam Jaffe original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 690px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"font-size: 1em\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-2.png\" alt=\"Three squares with dots in different formations.\" width=\"690\" height=\"214\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.6a-c: Three types of food distribution. a. Food has a uniform distribution when it is spread out evenly in the environment. b. Food has a clumped distribution when it is found in patches. c. Food is randomly distributed when it has neither uniform nor clumped distribution. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-6\/\">Food distribution patterns (Figure 6.8)<\/a> by Karin Enstam Jaffe original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Community Ecology<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are members of broader ecological communities composed of other species, including other primates, predators, parasites, and even humans. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_966\">Community ecology<\/a><\/strong> deals with the relationships and interactions between different organisms that occupy the same habitat. Interactions with <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_968\">conspecifics<\/a> <\/strong>(members of the same species) and <strong>heterospecifics<\/strong> (members of different species) are critical aspects of ecological communities. Some habitats support highly diverse <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_972\">primate communities<\/a><\/strong> consisting of 10 or more primate species. How can so many primate species occupy the same area and avoid competition? In most cases, the primate species that live together occupy different <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_974\">niches<\/a><\/strong>, which means they do not meet their needs for food and shelter in the exact same way. Two species can avoid competition by eating different kinds of food, living at different levels of a forest, or even searching for food at different times of day. Because tropical rainforests, like Manu National Park in Peru, are highly variable, with many habitats and many sources of food and shelter, there are many different niches for multiple species to exploit, and large primate communities can result (Figure 7.7).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1-1.png\" alt=\"Eight primate species.\" width=\"710\" height=\"550\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.7: Eight of the 14 primate species in Manu National Park, Peru. Top row, left to right: Goeldi\u2019s marmoset (Callimico goeldi), Rio Tapaj\u00f3s saki (Pithecia irrorata), tufted capuchin (Sapajus apella); middle row, left to right: emperor tamarin (Saguinus imperator), black-headed night monkey (Aotus nigriceps), Bolivian red howler (Alouatta sara); bottom row, left to right: black-capped squirrel monkey (Saimiri boliviensis), Peruvian spider monkey (Ateles chamek). Credit: Primate species in Manu National Park original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Jaffe is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/31223088@N08\/5582747190\/\">Tamarin Baby\/Goeldi\u2019s Monkey<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/31223088@N08\/\">stefan_fotos<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Pithecia_irrorata_-Brazil-8b.jpg\">Pithecia irrorata -Brazil-8b<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/9092428@N04\">Ana_Cotta<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tufted_capuchin_on_a_branch_in_Singapore.jpg\">Tufted Capuchin on a Branch in Singapor<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Basile_Morin\">Basile_Morin<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tamarin_portrait.JPG\">Tamarin Portrait<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/thebrockeninglory\/?pli=1\">Brocken Inaglory<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Aotus_nigriceps_1.jpg\">Aotus nigriceps 1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/dusantos_bh\/\">DuSantos<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Alouatta_sara_%28Bolivian_red_howler%29.jpg\">Aloutta sara (Bolivian Red Howler)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/nacho_dayz\/\">Raul Ignacio<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Black-capped_squirrel_monkey_%28Chalalan%29.jpg\">Black-Capped Squirrel Monkey (Chalalan)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Rodrigo_Mariaca\">Rodrigo Mariaca<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/eye1\/3185562151\/\">Maquisapa (Spider Monkey)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/eye1\/\">Ivan Mlinaric<\/a>, modified (cropped), <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>].<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Competitive Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although species living in the same location often occupy different niches to avoid competition, when a resource that is important for survival or reproduction is scarce, individuals will compete to obtain that resource. This is a central tenet of Charles Darwin\u2019s theory of evolution by natural selection (see Chapter 2 &amp; 3). Competition between primates takes two forms: Individuals engage in <strong>direct competition<\/strong>, which involves physical interaction between individuals (such as fighting), over resources that are large and worth defending (fruit is a good example of a food resource over which primates will fight). Individuals engage in <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_978\">indirect competition<\/a><\/strong>, in which there is no physical interaction between individuals, when a resource is small. Primates often engage in indirect competition for insects, like grasshoppers, that are eaten quickly, often before another individual arrives on the scene. Primates may engage in direct and\/or indirect competition with members of their own group, with members of other groups of conspecifics, or with heterospecifics.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Predator-Prey Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The plants and animals that primates eat are an important part of their ecological community. In addition to insects, many primates incorporate some <strong>vertebrate<\/strong> (animals with an internal spinal column or backbone) prey into their diet. Often, predation by primates is opportunistic, occurring because the prey happens to be in the right place at the right time. I\u2019ve observed vervets (<em>Chlorocebus pygerythrus<\/em>) opportunistically killing lizards by smashing them against a rock or tree trunk and eating them. More rarely, hunting is deliberate and cooperative. In some chimpanzee (<em>Pan troglodytes<\/em>) populations, hunts involve multiple individuals, each of whom plays a specific role and is rewarded afterward with a share of the prey that has been captured (Samuni Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All primates are susceptible to predation by mammalian <strong>carnivores <\/strong>(animals whose diet consists primarily of animal tissue (e.g., Figure 7.8a), reptiles (e.g., Figure 7.8b), or birds of prey (e.g., Figure 7.8c). Although the specific predators found in an ecological community differ based on geography, smaller primates always fall prey to a wider range of predators. Because predators are diverse in their hunting tactics, primates have evolved a wide range of tactics to avoid or escape them. We will discuss some of these behavioural adaptations later in this chapter in the section titled \u201cWhy Do Primates Live in Groups?.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210\" style=\"width: 765px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-195\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.8-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"A leopard, python, and harpy eagle.\" width=\"765\" height=\"229\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.8a-c: Examples of primate predators: the Indian leopard (Panthera fusca) is an example of a mammalian carnivore (top left), the South African python (Python natalensis) is an example of a reptilian predator (bottom left), and the harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja) of Central and South America is an example of a bird of prey (right). Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/srikaanth-sekar\/9814267145\/\">Leopard<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/srikaanth-sekar\/\"> Srikaanth Sekar<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Python_natalensis_G._J._Alexander.JPG\">Python natalensis G. J. Alexander<\/a> by Graham J. Alexander, University of the Witwatersrand, USGS, is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\"> public domain<\/a>. c. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Harpy_Eagle_clutching_captured_bird_-_Itirapina_Reserve.jpg\">Harpy Eagle clutching captured bird &#8211; Itirapina Reserve<\/a> by Jonathan Wilkins has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Mutualistic Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">So far, we&#8217;ve discussed competitive and predator-prey interactions in primate communities. But there are some interactions (between different primate species and between primates and other species) that are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_984\">mutualistic<\/a><\/strong>, which is when organisms of different species work together, each benefiting from the interaction or relationship. One example is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_986\">seed dispersal<\/a><\/strong>, which is the process by which seeds move away from the plant that produced them in preparation for germination and becoming a new plant. When seeds are dispersed by animals, like primates, it is an example of mutualism. The primate eats the fruit of a plant, which provides nutrients for its body, and in the process ingests the plant\u2019s seeds. Later, it deposits the seeds at another location as a pile of fertilizer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another example of mutualism is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_988\">polyspecific associations<\/a><\/strong>, which are associations between two or more different species that are maintained by behavioural changes by at least one of the species. While some associations are short in duration, others are semi-permanent. The mutualistic benefits of polyspecific associations include one species gaining access to food that would otherwise have been inaccessible or being alerted to the presence of predators that they would not have not have known were present otherwise. In some cases, individuals seem to recognize and seek out specific members of another species. Twenty years of observations on chimpanzees and Western lowland gorillas (<em>Gorilla gorilla gorilla<\/em>) in the Republic of Congo has revealed social ties (some might call them friendships) between individual chimpanzees and gorillas that last for years and occur in a variety of social contexts, including play (Sanz Et al. 2022).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Parasite-Host Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are hosts for a variety of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_990\">parasites<\/a><\/strong>, which are organisms that live in or on another organism (the host). Parasites come in many forms and pose varying levels of danger to the host. Blood parasites cause diseases like yellow fever and malaria. Skin parasites include fleas and ticks, which feed on the host\u2019s blood, and botflies, which lay eggs in the host\u2019s flesh. Bot fly larvae feed on the host\u2019s flesh as they develop and eventually (if not removed) break through the skin at maturity. Gut parasites, like tapeworms, get into the intestines and feed off of the food that is being digested by the host. Because most primates live in groups (see the \u201cPrimate Societies\u201d section of this chapter), the tendency for <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_992\">social transmission<\/a><\/strong> of parasites, or the transfer of parasites from one individual to another, is high. Primates have evolved mechanisms to avoid parasite infection, including switching sleeping and feeding sites so as to avoid parasites. Mandrills (<em>Mandrillus sphinx<\/em>) have been shown to avoid grooming infected conspecifics as well as to avoid their feces, which smell different than the feces of individuals who are not infected with parasites (Poirotte Et al. 2017). Other primates, including chimpanzees, appear to self-medicate when infected with parasites by ingesting plants that have antiparasitic properties (Krief Et al. 2005).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Human-Primate Interactions<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Humans are part of many primate communities and our relationship with our closest relatives is often complicated. In some areas, humans hunt primates for their meat or as trophies, or so they can sell the infants as pets. As the human population increases in size, our demand for natural resources, like wood to build houses or land on which to grow food, also increases, often at the expense of pristine primate (and other animal) habitat. As their natural habitat shrinks, primates search for food in areas occupied by humans and may be shot as crop-raiding pests. While deforestation, hunting, and the pet trade are examples of ways in which humans negatively affect the lives of primates, some human-primate interactions are beneficial. In some parts of the world primates are central to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_994\">ecotourism<\/a><\/strong>, which focuses on nature-based attractions to educate tourists and uses economically and ecologically sustainable practices. Perhaps one of the greatest success stories of ecotourism involves the mountain gorillas of Rwanda (see Figure 7.4b). After internal conflict plagued Rwanda during the 1990s, the Virunga Mountains area developed gorilla-based tourism to aid in socioeconomic development and to bring stability to the region. This process not only helped to increase mountain gorilla populations but was also able to generate enough income to cover the operation costs of three national parks and provide income and other benefits to people living in the area (Maekawa Et al. 2013). You can learn more about human-primate interactions in Appendix B: Primate Conservation.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Primate Societies<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unlike many other animals, primates are highly social and many live in stable groups consisting of adult males and females, even outside the<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_996\">breeding season<\/a><\/strong>, when females are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_998\">receptive<\/a><\/strong> and available for mating because they are not pregnant or nursing. Indeed, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1000\">sociality<\/a><\/strong>, or the tendency to form social groups, is a key behavioural adaptation of the order primates (see Chapter 6). This has led primatologists to ask two questions: \u201cWhy do primates live in groups?\u201d and \u201cWhat types of groups do primates live in?\u201d<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Why Do Primates Live in Groups?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates live in groups when the benefits of doing so exceed the costs. Although there are many potential benefits to group living, enhanced feeding competition and predator avoidance are important benefits for many group living primates. When primates feed on high-quality, scarce food (like fruit), larger groups are more successful in competition with other groups. For example, in a long-term study of vervets in Kenya\u2019s Amboseli National Park, larger vervet groups had larger and better <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1002\">home ranges<\/a><\/strong>, which is the area in which a group regularly moves around as it performs its daily activities, including searching for food and water. Females in larger groups had higher average infant and female survival rates than the smallest group. Because pregnancy and nursing are energetically expensive for females, female <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1004\">reproductive success<\/a><\/strong>, or genetic contribution to future generations (measured by the number of offspring produced), is limited by access to food. Although living in a group means females compete with members of their own group for food, the benefits of being a member of a larger vervet group outweigh the costs (Cheney &amp; Seyfarth 1987).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">However, because they contain more individuals, larger groups are more likely to attract the attention of predators compared to smaller groups. This is one of the reasons that primates who rely on <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1006\">crypsis<\/a><\/strong>, or the ability to avoid detection by others, including predators, are often <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1008\">solitary<\/a> <\/strong>(the term used to describe individuals who do not live together with other members of their species) and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1010\">nocturnal<\/a><\/strong>, or active at night. If an animal is already hard to see because it is active at night, then moving quietly in small groups is a good strategy to avoid detection by predators. The slow loris (<em>Nycticebus coucang<\/em>) of Southeast Asia is a good example of this strategy (Figure 7.9a). Nocturnal and solitary, the slow loris moves slowly and quietly as its primary strategy to avoid detection (Wiens &amp; Zitzmann 2003). In contrast, primates who live in large groups and are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1012\">diurnal<\/a><\/strong>, or active during the day (like gelada baboons [<em>Theropithecus gelada<\/em>]; Figure 7.9b) cannot avoid detection by predators. Instead, group-living primates rely on behaviours that alert others to the presence of danger and\/or deter predators, including shared <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1014\">vigilance<\/a><\/strong> (watchful behaviour to detect potential danger), <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1016\">mobbing<\/a><\/strong> (the act of cooperatively attacking or harassing a predator), and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1018\">alarm calling<\/a><\/strong> (vocalizations emitted by social animals in response to danger). We will discuss alarm calls in the <em>Communication<\/em> section.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_196\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-196\" style=\"width: 761px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-196\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.9.jpg\" alt=\"A slow loris. A group of gelada baboons.\" width=\"761\" height=\"269\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-196\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.9a\/b: Some primates, like the slow loris (left), are solitary and spend most of their time alone. However, most primates, like the gelada baboon (right), live in groups of varying sizes. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Slow_Loris.jpg\">Slow Loris<\/a> by Jmiksanek is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/39997856@N03\/7588490544\">Field of baboons<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/39997856@N03\/\">mariusz kluzniak<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What Types of Groups Do Primates Live In? <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates vary with regard to the types of groups in which they live. A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1020\">social system<\/a> <\/strong>describes a set of social interactions and behaviours that is typical for a species. The components that make up a species\u2019 social system include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Group size, which refers to the number of individuals that typically live together. Primate group size can be highly variable, ranging from one or a few individuals, to a few dozen, upward to several hundred individuals.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Group composition describes group membership in terms of age class (e.g., adult, juvenile, infant) and sex. In some primates, groups consist of a mother and her dependent offspring while in others, one adult male lives long-term with one adult female and their dependent offspring. In other species, one or more adult males live with multiple females and their offspring.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">A species\u2019 <strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1022\">mating system<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> refers to which male(s) and female(s) mate. The terms that describe a mating system (e.g., <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1024\">polygyny<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, in which one male mates with multiple females) are sometimes used to describe a primate species\u2019 social system, but a mating system is one component of the species\u2019 social system. For example, two species might both have polygynous mating systems, but in one species, the group is composed of one male and multiple females, while members of the other species live as solitary individuals.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1026\">Ranging behaviour<\/a> <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">refers to the way in which animals move about their environment. Most primate species have a home range, where they perform their daily activities. Some primates defend a <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1028\">territory<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> which is the part of the home range that the group actively guards in an attempt to keep out conspecifics.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1030\">Dispersal<\/a> <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">patterns describe which sex moves to a new group to reproduce. In most primate species, males disperse because the benefits of dispersal, including increased access to mates and reduced competition from other males, outweigh the costs of migrating into a new group, which often comes with aggression from current group members. For many female primates, the opposite is true: females usually benefit from remaining <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1032\">philopatric<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, or in the group of their birth. This allows them to maintain strong alliances with female relatives, which helps them compete successfully against other groups for food. In solitary species, offspring of both sexes leave their mother\u2019s home range and become solitary. If this did not happen, the species would not be solitary. Even though both sexes disperse in solitary species, males usually disperse farther than females.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Social interactions describe the ways in which individuals interact with members of their own and other groups of conspecifics. <strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1034\">Affiliative<\/a> <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(i.e., friendly or nonaggressive) behaviours include <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1036\">grooming<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (picking through the fur of another individual), playing, or <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1038\">coalitions<\/a> <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(temporary alliances between individuals). <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1040\">Agonistic<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (i.e., aggressive) behaviours include fighting over food or fighting over access to mates. In groups that contain multiple adult individuals of the same sex, it is common to have a <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1042\">dominance hierarchy<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">, or a group of individuals that can be ranked according to their relative amount of power over others in the hierarchy. Initially, dominance hierarchies are established through the outcome of conflicts. Individuals who lose conflicts with others are <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1044\">subordinate<\/a><\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"> (or low rank) to those who win them. Those who win conflicts are <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_744\">dominant<\/a> <\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;text-indent: 18pt;font-size: 1em\">(or high rank). Dominant individuals gain access to resources, like food or mates, before subordinates. Once a hierarchy is established, agonism decreases because everyone \u201cknows their place.\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The main types of primate social systems are as follows: solitary; single-male, single-female; single-male, multi-female; multi-male, multi-female; fission-fusion; and multi-male, single-female. These types are discussed below.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Solitary<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recall that the term <em>solitary<\/em> is used to describe species in which individuals do not live or travel together with other members of the same species, except for mothers and unweaned offspring. Males typically occupy a large home range or territory that overlaps the home ranges of multiple females, with whom they mate (Figure 7.10a). Because one male mates with multiple females, the mating system of solitary primates is polygyny. Social interactions between adults are limited but because some males do not get to mate, competition between males is intense. When males compete physically, they benefit from large body size and weaponry. The result is<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1046\">sexual dimorphism<\/a><\/strong>, when males and females look different from one another. Both males and females disperse, although males move farther from their mother than females. The nocturnal West African potto (<em>Perodicticus <\/em><em>potto<\/em>; Figure 7.10b) is solitary. Bornean orangutans, which are diurnal, are also solitary.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-2\" style=\"width: 620px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-197\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.10-01-1.jpg\" alt=\"Grouping pattern description is available in caption. A potto in a tree at night also shown.\" width=\"620\" height=\"272\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.10a-b: Illustration of a solitary species\u2019 grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the male\u2019s home range; open oval represents individual female home ranges. The West African potto is a solitary primate (right). <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: a. Polygyny in a Solitary Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/nikborrow\/31307385633\">West African Potto Perodicticus potto Kakum National Park, Ghana<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/nikborrow\/\"> Nik Barrow<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Single-Male, Single-Female<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primate species in which an adult male and adult female live together with their dependent offspring have a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1048\">single-male, single-female<\/a><\/strong> social system, sometimes referred to as a \u201cfamily,\u201d with group sizes between two and five individuals. The adult male and adult female engage in behaviours that strengthen their social relationship, or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1050\">pair bond<\/a><\/strong>, including mutual grooming and resting together. The pair defend a territory (Figure 7.11a) and keep same-sex individuals away from their mate. The adult male and adult female mate with each other, so the mating system is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1052\">monogamy<\/a><\/strong>, although mating outside the pair bond may occur. Species with monogamous mating systems are usually <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1054\">sexually monomorphic<\/a><\/strong> (males and females look similar) because competition for mates is relaxed since most males are able to obtain a mate. Males are usually confident that they are the father of their mate\u2019s infant, so they help with offspring care by carrying the infant when it is not nursing. Once offspring are sexually mature, both males and females disperse. As with solitary species, males disperse farther from their parents than females. Bolivian Gray titi monkeys (<em>Plecturocebus donacophilus<\/em>) are an example of a species that has a single-male, single-female social system. One of their signature behaviours is tail twining, when two individuals sit with their tails wrapped around each other (Figure 7.11b). This behaviour reinforces the social bond among family members and is especially common between the adult male and female. Gibbons (<em>Hylobates<\/em>) and owl monkeys (<em>Aotus<\/em>) also live in single-male, single-female groups.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_198\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-198\" style=\"width: 608px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-198\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.11-01.jpg\" alt=\"Left: Circle contains one dot (female) and one square (male). Right: Two titi monkeys.\" width=\"608\" height=\"357\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-198\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.11a-b: Illustration of a single-male, single-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s territory, which the bonded pair defend against conspecifics. The titi monkey (right) is an example of a primate species with a single-male, single-female social system. Credit: a. Single-Male, Single-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Callicebus-brunneus-London-Zoo.jpg\">Two Red Titi Monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) sitting together with their tails intertwined at the London Zoo<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Stevenj\"> Steven G. Johnson<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Single-Male, Multi-Female<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1056\">Single-male, multi-female<\/a><\/strong> groups consist of one adult male living with multiple adult females and their dependent offspring (Figure 7.12a ) . These groups can range from as few as five or ten individuals to as many as 50. Female social relationships are governed by the female dominance hierarchy. Females are usually philopatric and males disperse. Males who are unable to join a group of females may join a bachelor group with other males. Because a single male mates with multiple females, the mating system is polygyny. Species that form single-male, multi-female groups may or may not defend a territory, but the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1058\">resident male<\/a><\/strong>, who lives with a group of females, is aggressive toward other males, who may try to take over the group and become the new resident male. Competition between males to be the resident male of a group is intense, and these species usually display sexual dimorphism, with males being larger than females and possessing large canines. Hanuman langurs (<em>Semnopithecus entellus<\/em>) of India form single-male, multi-female groups (Figure 7.12b). When a new male takes over a group of females and ousts the former resident male, he may commit <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1060\">infanticide<\/a>, <\/strong>or kill the unweaned infants. This is especially likely if the new resident male has not yet mated with any of the females and thus cannot be the infants\u2019 father. This causes the females, who were nursing, to become sexually receptive sooner, increasing the new resident male\u2019s chances of producing offspring (Sharma, Ram, and \u200b\u200bRaipurohit 2010). Gorillas, patas monkeys, and golden snub-nosed monkeys (<em>Rhinopithecus roxellana<\/em>) also live in single-male, multi-female groups.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-3\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-3\" style=\"width: 749px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-199\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.12.jpg\" alt=\"Left: Circle contains nine dots and one square; outside are three squares. Right: Adult langur and infant.\" width=\"749\" height=\"295\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-3\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.12a-b: An illustration of the one-male, multi-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s home range (or territory). The Hanuman langur (right) is an example of a species with a one-male, multi-female social system. Credit: a. Single-Male, Multi-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/photo\/close-up-photo-of-two-gray-langurs-8642891\/\">Close-up of Two Grey Langurs<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/@amitrai10\/\"> Amit Rai<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/license\/\"> free to use via Pexels<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Multi-Male, Multi-Female<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1062\">Multi-male, multi-female<\/a><\/strong> groups consist of multiple adult males living with multiple adult females and their dependent offspring. Although there is more than one adult male, there are more adult females than adult males in the group (Figure 7.13a). Multi-male, multi-female groups can range in size from about ten to as many as 500 individuals. They occupy a home range but may or may not defend a territory. In groups that contain multiple males and multiple females, it is not possible for one male to monopolize all the matings, so the mating system is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1064\">polygamy<\/a><\/strong>, in which multiple males mate with multiple females. However, this does not mean that all males have an equal opportunity to mate with all females. In multi-male, multi-female groups, both males and females form a dominance hierarchy. The male dominance hierarchy determines their access to females for mating in much the same way that a female dominance hierarchy determines a female\u2019s access to food. Because their place in the hierarchy can affect their reproductive success, males compete with each other, but because it is rare for males to be excluded from mating altogether, the level of competition and degree of sexual dimorphism are less extreme than what we see in polygynous species. Usually, females are philopatric and males disperse. Vervet monkeys (Figure 7.13b), ring-tailed lemurs (<em>Lemur catta<\/em>), white-faced capuchins (<em>Cebus capucinus<\/em>), and black-capped squirrel monkeys (<em>Saimiri boliviensis<\/em>) live in multi-male, multi-female groups.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-4\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-4\" style=\"width: 585px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-200\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.13.jpg\" alt=\"Circle contains twelve dots and three squares. Right: Two vervet monkeys.\" width=\"585\" height=\"267\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-4\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.13a-b: An illustration of the multi-male, multi-female grouping pattern is shown on the left. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s home range (or territory). Vervet monkeys (right) are an example of a species that lives in multi-male, multi-female groups. Credit: a. Multi-Male, Multi-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/berniedup\/6011902081\/\">Vervet Monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\"> Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Fission-Fusion<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1066\">Fission-fusion<\/a><\/strong> is a fluid social system in which the size and composition of the social group changes, with groups splitting (fission) or merging (fusion) depending on food availability (Pinacho-Guendulain &amp; Ramos-Fern\u00e1ndez 2017). When key resources are scarce, individuals spread out (fission) and move and feed individually or in small subgroups (Figure 7.14a). When key food resources are plentiful, individuals come together (fusion) and individuals travel and feed as a more cohesive group (Figure 7.14a). Fission-fusion social structure is believed to reduce feeding competition when resources are scarce. Because group composition changes over time, species with fission-fusion social systems are referred to as a community. Communities consist of multiple adult males, multiple adult females, and offspring, and group size varies but typically ranges from ten to a few dozen individuals. Females typically disperse and males are philopatric. Thus, community males are related and display unusual forms of cooperation. The mating system associated with fission-fusion is polygamy. Because males are not excluded from mating, competition for mates is relaxed and sexual dimorphism is moderate (males are slightly larger than females). Geoffroy\u2019s spider monkeys (<em>Ateles geoffroyi<\/em>) (Figure 7.14b) and chimpanzees both have fission-fusion social system.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-5\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-5\" style=\"width: 720px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-201\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.14.jpg\" alt=\"Diagrams show fission and fusion. Three spider monkeys.\" width=\"720\" height=\"289\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-5\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.14a-b: An illustration of the fission-fusion grouping pattern appears on the left. The left illustration represents fission, when females travel and feed independently in individual home ranges within the community boundary. The right illustration represents fusion, when community members form a cohesive group. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Key: square = adult male; dot = adult female; open circle represents the outline of the community boundary. Open ovals represent individual female home ranges when the group fissions. Credits: a. Fission-Fusion Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/berniedup\/49562895393\">Geoffry\u2019s Spider Monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/65695019@N07\">Bernard DUPONT<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Multi-Male, Single-Female<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1068\">multi-male, single-female<\/a> <\/strong>groups, two or more males live with one breeding female, her dependent offspring, and non-breeding females (Figure 7.15a). This type of social system is found in the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1070\">callitrichids<\/a><\/strong>, the primate family that includes marmosets (<em>Callithrix<\/em>; Figure 7.15b) and tamarins (<em>Saguinus<\/em>) of Central and South America. Their groups rarely exceed 15 individuals, and each group actively defends their territory from conspecifics. Although more than one adult female may live in the group, the mating system is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1072\">polyandry<\/a><\/strong> because there is only one breeding female who mates with all of the adult males. This is achieved through <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1074\">reproductive suppression<\/a><\/strong>, which involves the breeding female preventing other females from reproducing through physiological and\/or behavioural means (Digby, Ferrari, &amp; Salzman 2011). This limits the opportunities for other females in the group to become pregnant. Instead, these females, and the males in the group, help raise the breeding female\u2019s offspring. This is referred to as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1076\">cooperative breeding<\/a><\/strong> and usually takes the form of carrying infants, grooming them, and protecting them from danger (de Oliveira Terceiro &amp; Burkart 2019). Because reproductive opportunities for female tamarins and marmosets are limited, they are very competitive, and females are slightly larger than males, which helps them compete for the breeding spot in a group.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-6\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-6\" style=\"width: 578px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-202\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.15.jpg\" alt=\"Circle contains two squares, two unmarked dots, and a B dot. Right: Marmosets with twins.\" width=\"578\" height=\"269\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-6\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.15a-b: An illustration of multi-male, single-female grouping pattern appears on the left. Key: square = adult male; B dot = breeding female; unmarked dot = non-breeding female; open circle represents the outline of the group\u2019s territory, which is defended against conspecifics. The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is an example of a primate species that has this type of social system (right). Credit: a. Multi-Male, Single-Female Social System original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Enstam Jaffe is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Family_of_Common_Marmoset_-_REGUA_-_Brazil_MG_9480_(12930855765).jpg\">Family of Common Marmoset &#8211; REGUA &#8211; Brazil MG 9480 (12930855765)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/30818542@N04\"> Francesco Veronesi<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Reproductive Strategies<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reproductive strategies have evolved to maximize individual reproductive success. These strategies can be divided into those that deal with offspring production and care (parental investment) and those that maximize mating success (sexual selection). Because the reproductive physiology of male and female primates differs, males and females differ with regard to parental investment and sexual selection strategies. Female strategies focus on obtaining the food necessary to sustain a pregnancy and choosing the best male(s) to father offspring. Male strategies focus on gaining access to receptive females.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parental Investment<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 362px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9.jpg\" alt=\"Monkey holds baby.\" width=\"362\" height=\"241\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.16: A female Japanese macaque nursing her infant. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Snow_monkey_baby_milk_time.jpg\">Snow monkey baby milk time<\/a> by Daisuke Tashiro is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Biologically speaking, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1078\">parental investment<\/a><\/strong> is any time or energy a parent devotes to the current offspring that enhances its survival (and eventual reproductive success) at the expense of the parent\u2019s ability to invest in the next offspring (Trivers 1972). Female primates invest more heavily in offspring than males. Even before conception, females produce energy-containing eggs, and they will be responsible for sustaining a fertilized egg until it implants in the uterus. After that, they invest in pregnancy and lactation (Figure 7.16). Because all of this investment requires a lot of energy, female primates can only produce one offspring (or litter) at a time. A species\u2019 <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1080\">interbirth interval<\/a><\/strong>, or the typical length of time between one birth and the next, is determined by the length of time necessary to maximize each offspring\u2019s survival without jeopardizing the female\u2019s ability to produce the greatest number of offspring possible. If a female invests too little (i.e., weans an offspring too early), she may give birth to many offspring, but very few (if any) of them will survive. If she invests too much (i.e., nurses an offspring even after it could be weaned), she ensures the survival of that individual offspring but will not be able to produce very many during her lifetime. To maximize her reproductive success, a female must invest <em>just<\/em> long enough to ensure the greatest number of offspring survive to reproduce. We often think of maternal care as an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1082\">innate<\/a><\/strong> (or natural), instinctive behaviour. Yet this is not the case. The \u201cSpecial Topic: Is Maternal Behaviour Innate?\u201d dispels the myth that maternal behaviour is solely instinctual and explains how female primates learn to be good mothers.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual Selection<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1084\">Sexual selection<\/a><\/strong>, or selection for traits that maximize mating success, comes in two forms. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1086\">Intrasexual selection<\/a><\/strong> is selection for traits that enhance the ability of members of one sex to compete amongst themselves (\u201c<em>intra<\/em>sexual\u201d = within one sex). <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1088\">Intersexual selection<\/a><\/strong> is selection for traits that enhance the ability of one sex to attract the other (\u201c<em>inter<\/em>sexual\u201d = between the sexes).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intrasexual selection most often operates on males. In the wild, adult females are either pregnant or lactating for most of their adult lives. So, in a given population, there are usually more males available and willing to mate than there are females. The result? Females are a scarce resource over which males compete. Intrasexual selection favours traits that help a male win fights with other males. In primates, these traits include large body size (Figure 7.17a) and large canines (Figure 7.17b). Because females don\u2019t possess these same traits, males and females of some species look different; that is, they are sexually dimorphic (Figure 7.17a).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_207\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-207\" style=\"width: 691px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-204\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.17.jpg\" alt=\"Male baboon with two females. Adult male baboon.\" width=\"691\" height=\"293\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-207\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.17a-b: a. Hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) are sexually dimorphic. The male (left) is much bigger than the female (centre) and also has different coloured fur. b. Adult males, like this gelada baboon, also have larger canines than females. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dierenpark_Emmen_baboon_(2679944324).jpg\">Dierenpark Emmen baboon (2679944324)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/80538772@N00\"> robin bos<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License.<\/a> b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Olive_Baboon_Papio_anubis_in_Tanzania_3066_Nevit.jpg\">Olive Baboon Papio anubis, Picture Taken in Tanzania<\/a> by Nevit Dilmen has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intersexual selection also tends to operate on males, selecting traits that make a male more attractive to females. Females, in turn, choose among potential fathers. Because female primates invest more in offspring production and care than males (see the \u201cParental Investment\u201d section, above), it is more costly for them if the offspring dies before maturity or reaches maturity but does not reproduce. Thus, it benefits a female primate to be choosy and try to pick the healthiest male as a mate. Males must display traits that tell a female why she should choose <em>him<\/em>, and not another male, as her mate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What traits are female primates looking for? In humans, women may look for a mate who can provide important resources, such as food, paternal care, or protection. This is rare in other primates, though, since most females do not need males to provide resources. More commonly, female primates obtain genetic benefits for their offspring from choosing one male over another. Often the specific criteria by which females select mates is unknown. However, if a female chooses a healthy (as indicated by traits like a plush coat, bright colouration, or large body size) or older male, she may obtain genes for her offspring that code for health or long life. If a male\u2019s rank is determined by competitive ability that has a genetic component, females who choose males who win fights may acquire these genes (and qualities) for their offspring. Females in some species appear to prefer new immigrants, sometimes even \u201csneaking\u201d copulations with males who are not established members of their groups. Such a preference may provide their offspring with novel genes and increase genetic variation (for more about the importance of genetic variation, see Chapter 4). Female choice is often more subtle than male-male competition, so it can be more difficult to study. However, as more research is conducted, we continue to improve our understanding of the ways that female primates exert their choice.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Is Maternal Behaviour Innate?<\/h2>\n<p>Zoos almost always have nurseries where infants are cared for by zookeepers if their mothers will not care for them (Figure 7.18). These exhibits are among the most popular because the babies are so cute and so much fun to watch. And the caretaking positions in zoo nurseries are often among the most coveted by zoo personnel for the same reasons. But if maternal behaviour is instinctive, why do zoo nurseries even exist? The answer is that in many species, including primates, maternal behaviour is not purely instinctual; it is dependent on <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1090\">social learning<\/a><\/strong> (behaviour learned by observing and imitating others), as well.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 433px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-1.png\" alt=\"Newborn orangutan feeding from a bottle.\" width=\"433\" height=\"336\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.18: Newborn orangutan at Audubon Zoo being bottle-fed. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/newsroom.audubonnatureinstitute.org\/critically-endangered-orangutan-gives-birth-at-audubon-zoo\/\">Newborn orangutan born at Audubon Zoo being bottle fed<\/a> (2022) by<a href=\"https:\/\/audubonnatureinstitute.org\/\"> Audubon Nature Institute<\/a> is used by permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Captive female primates, including gorillas and chimpanzees, who have not had the opportunity to observe their mother or other females care for infants do not know how to care for their own offspring. Although it is preferred that the primate mother care for her own infant, there are cases when she will not and humans must step in to ensure the offspring survives. When hand-rearing by humans is necessary, the infant is returned to the group as soon as possible in the hopes that it will learn species-typical behaviour from its mother and other conspecifics. Observations such as these indicate that maternal behaviour is learned, not innate, and that maternal care is critically important to the social and psychological development of young primates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Communication<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In its most basic form, communication occurs when one individual (the sender) emits a signal that conveys information, which is detected by another individual (the receiver). We have discussed several aspects of primate sociality in this chapter, all of which require the communication of information between individuals. But exactly <em>how<\/em> does a female chimpanzee communicate her sexual availability? <em>How<\/em> does a vervet monkey communicate the approach of a leopard or that a python is nearby? <em>How<\/em> do solitary, nocturnal primates, like the slow loris, communicate information about themselves to conspecifics? Primate communication comes in four forms: vocal, visual, olfactory, and tactile. Species vary in their reliance on each.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vocal Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates use sound to communicate danger or threats, to claim and maintain a territory, or make contact with other group members. Alarm calls are given in response to predators. In some cases, alarm calls are used to alert members of the group to the presence of a predator so they can take evasive action. In other cases, they are directed at the predator itself, signaling that it has been detected. You can learn more about alarm calls as forms of vocal communication in the highlight box in this chapter entitled \u201cDig Deeper: Alarm Calls: Signals to Friends or Foes?.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Loud calls are designed to travel great distances and are used in territorial defence by many primate species including indris (<em>Indri indri<\/em>), orangutans, gibbons, and howler monkeys (<em>Alouatta<\/em>). In dense forest, where visual communication can be difficult, loud calls can be useful in signaling to conspecifics that a group or individual occupies a specific area. Howler monkeys are named for their loud calls, or \u201croars,\u201d which can be heard one kilometre or more away (Sch\u00f6n Ybarra 1986). Howler monkey roars may act to maintain distance between neighbouring groups or keep extragroup males from entering the home range (1986).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other vocalizations are intended to communicate with individuals in one\u2019s own group. These include vocalizations given as part of threat displays or dominance interactions, as well as contact calls that provide information about one\u2019s location to other group members. Chacma baboons (<em>Papio ursinus<\/em>) have a rich repertoire of vocalizations for communicating with other group members (Fischer Et al. 2008). Adult males give specific vocalizations during threat displays and physical confrontations. Subordinates \u201cscreech\u201d when retreating from a dominant individual, signaling submission. Since baboons rely on membership in their group for finding food and detecting predators, a baboon separated from his group will vocalize in an attempt to regain contact. Young baboons emit their own contact calls when separated from their mothers.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Visual Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_207-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-207-2\" style=\"width: 493px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-206\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.19.jpg\" alt=\"Female baboon with sexual swelling. Male and female baboon.\" width=\"493\" height=\"209\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-207-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.19a-b: Two female hamadryas baboons. The female on the left has a sexual swelling while the female on the right (in foreground, with infant clinging to her belly) does not. An adult male is behind her. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Sexual_swelling_in_female_Hamadryas_baboon.jpg\">Sexual swelling in female Hamadryas baboon<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mamoritai\/\"> Mamoritai<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Hamadryas_baboon_at_Giza_Zoo_by_Hatem_Moushir_36.JPG\">Hamadryas baboon at Giza Zoo by Hatem Moushir 36<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Hatem_Moushir\"> Hatem Moushir<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1092\">Visual communication<\/a><\/strong>, which involves signals that can be seen, is an important component of nonhuman primate behaviour, alone or in combination with other forms of communication. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1094\">Piloerection<\/a><\/strong>, or raising one\u2019s hair or fur, is used in aggressive interactions to make an individual appear larger than it actually is. Female macaques (<em>Macaca<\/em>), baboons (<em>Papio<\/em>), and chimpanzees, signal sexual receptivity through changes in the size, shape, and, often, colour of their hindquarters, called a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1096\">sexual swelling<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 7.19a). The sexual swelling reaches its maximum size at ovulation. When females are not receptive, either because they are pregnant or are nursing, they do not display a sexual swelling (Figure 7.19b). Thus, the presence or absence of a sexual swelling signals a female\u2019s reproductive state.<\/p>\n<p>Monkeys and apes use diverse facial expressions in visual communication. Showing your teeth in a \u201csmile\u201d sends a signal of friendship in humans. Displaying teeth in this way is a sign of anxiety or fear in primates. That male mandrill you see \u201cyawning\u201d at your local zoo is actually displaying his teeth to signal tension or to threaten a rival (Figure 7.20a). In addition to showing their canines, male gelada baboons use \u201clip flips,\u201d in which the gums and teeth are exposed by flipping the upper lip up over the nostrils (Figure 7.20b), and \u201craised eyelids,\u201d in which the pale eyelids are exposed by pulling the scalp back as threatening gestures (Aich, Moos-Heilen, &amp; Zimmerman 1990). Submissive males respond by fleeing or presenting their hindquarters.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_207-3\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-207-3\" style=\"width: 597px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-207\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.20-1.jpg\" alt=\"Adult male mandrill and adult male hamadryas baboon yawning.\" width=\"597\" height=\"310\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-207-3\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.20a-b: Males use visual displays to communicate with other males. The male mandrill (left) is yawning to display his canines, and the male gelada baboon (right) enhances the yawn by flipping his upper lip back and raising his eyelids. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/pxhere.com\/en\/photo\/559944\">Mandrill<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/with\/24639723420\/\">Mathias Appel<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>. b.<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:BabouinGeladaAuReveil.JPG\"> BabouinGeladaAuReveil<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:BluesyPete\"> BluesyPete<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<figure id=\"attachment_209\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-209\" style=\"width: 414px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-208\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.22.jpg\" alt=\"A bald uakari. A spider monkey.\" width=\"414\" height=\"154\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-209\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.22a-b: Many monkey species have colourful faces, including the bald uakari (Cacajao calvus; left) and the white-bellied spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth) (right). Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Uakari.jpg\">Uakari<\/a> by Coada dragos has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. 6.22b <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ateles_belzebuth_(White-bellied_spider_monkey)_2.jpg\">Ateles belzebuth (White-bellied spider monkey) 2<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ewas-world\/\"> Ewa<\/a> (username: Ewcek65) has been modified (cropped) and is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 163px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-3.png\" alt=\"A male mandrill\u2019s face.\" width=\"163\" height=\"246\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.21: The colourful face of the male mandrill provides information about health and fitness to other mandrills.Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/24842082402\/\">Mandrill<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mathiasappel\/with\/24639723420\/\">Mathias Appel<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Primates also communicate through colour. In female and male mandrills, facial colouration provides information about an individual\u2019s health, competitive ability, and reproductive state to conspecifics (Figure 7.21; Setchell &amp;t al. 2008; Setchell, Wickings, &amp; Knapp 2006). Variation in facial colouration among monkeys of Central and South America ranges from very simple (Figure 7.22a) to complex (Figure 7.22b). Species living with larger numbers of other primate species have evolved more complex facial colouration patterns, suggesting that this trait evolved as a form of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1098\">species recognition<\/a><\/strong>, or the ability to differentiate conspecifics from members of other species (Santana, Lynch Alfaro, &amp; Alfaro 2012).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Olfactory Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All primates use scent to communicate. Females secrete chemicals from their <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1100\">anogenital<\/a> <\/strong>region (the area of the anus and genitals) that provide males with information about their reproductive state. In some species, like macaques and chimpanzees, this olfactory signal is enhanced by a sexual swelling, as discussed above. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1102\">Olfactory communication<\/a><\/strong>, or communicating through scent, is particularly important for monkeys of Central and South America, lemurs, and lorises. Male and female common squirrel monkeys (<em>Saimiri sciureus<\/em>) (Figure 7.23a) engage in \u201curine washing,\u201d in which an individual urinates on its hands and feet and then uses them to spread urine all over its body. Urine washing may be used to mark trails for others to follow, to control body temperature, as part of dominance displays, or to communicate reproductive state (Boinski 1992). During aggressive interactions with other males, male ring-tailed lemurs rub their tails with scent from glands on their wrists and chests. They use their \u201cperfumed\u201d tails in aggressive interactions with other males, who may respond by waiving their own scented tail, with physical aggression, or by fleeing (Jolly 1966). Males also waive their tails, saturated in scent, to attract females (Shirasu et al. 2020). Males use scent glands in their wrists to mark territorial boundaries (Figure 7.23b; Mertl-Millhollen 1988).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_210-7\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-210-7\" style=\"width: 641px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-210\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.23.jpg\" alt=\"A squirrel monkey. A ring-tailed lemur.\" width=\"641\" height=\"332\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-210-7\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.23a-b: Some primates, like the common squirrel monkey (left) and the ring-tailed lemur (right), communicate using scent. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rubund\/6337874822\/\">Saimiri sciureus<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rubund\/\">Ruben Undheim<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lemur_catta_004.jpg\">Lemur catta 004<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Maky\">Maky<\/a> has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tactile Communication<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1104\">Tactile communication<\/a><\/strong>, or communicating through touch, is very important in all primate species. Physical contact is used to comfort and reassure, is part of courtship and mating, and is used to establish dominance and alliances. Grooming is an important and clearly enjoyable form of tactile communication for all primates (Figure 7.24). Not only does grooming serve to clean the skin and fur, removing parasites and debris, but it is an important affiliative behaviour that helps reinforce social bonds, repair relationships, and cement alliances.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 674px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-8.png\" alt=\"Four primate species grooming.\" width=\"674\" height=\"478\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.24: Examples of grooming in Japanese macaques (upper left), tufted capuchins (Sapajus apella) (upper right), gelada baboons (lower left), and black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata; lower right). Credit: Examples of grooming original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Karin Jaffe is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Yakushima_macaques_grooming_each_other.jpg\">Yakushima macaques grooming each other<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Grendelkhan\"> Grendelkhan<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tufted_capuchin_monkeys_grooming_session_III.jpg\">Tufted capuchin monkeys grooming session III<\/a> by Adrian Soldati, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>;<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Baboons_Wunania_012018.jpg\"> Baboons Wunania 012018<\/a> by Kim Toogood, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>;<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Black-and-white_ruffed_lemur_03.jpg\"> Black-and-white ruffed lemur 03<\/a> by Mattis2412, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/deed.en\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>].<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: Alarm Calls: Signals to Friends or Foes?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alarm calls are common among group-living primates. They often serve to notify conspecifics of potential danger, as is the case with vervet monkeys. Research has shown that: (1) vervets classify predators based on hunting style; (2) alarm calls convey information to other vervets about that hunting style; and (3) other vervets respond in ways appropriate for evading that type of predator (Seyfarth, Cheney, &amp; Marler 1980a). When a vervet gives a \u201cleopard\u201d alarm call (directed at mammalian carnivores like leopards, Figure 7.25a), monkeys on the ground climb the nearest tree, while monkeys already in trees stay there or climb higher. Since most mammalian carnivores hunt on the ground, getting into, and staying in, a tree is the best option for escape. When the \u201csnake\u201d alarm call is given, vervets stand on their hind legs and look down at the ground (Figure 7.25b). Since snakes are not pursuit predators, locating them quickly so as to avoid them is the best strategy. Lastly, when an \u201ceagle\u201d alarm call is given, vervets look up or run into bushes, both of which are useful responses for avoiding hawks and eagles, which attack from above (Figure 7.25c). Vervets clearly understand the meaning of each type of alarm call, as they respond appropriately even when they do not see the actual predator (Seyfarth, Cheney, &amp; Marler 1980b). Such <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1106\">semantic communication<\/a><\/strong>, which involves the systematic use of signals to refer to objects in the environment, was once believed to be unique to humans. It may be a precursor to the symbolic capacities of human language.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 482px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1.jpg\" alt=\"Primate in a tree views a leopard.\" width=\"482\" height=\"344\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.25a<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 484px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-2.jpg\" alt=\"Primate views snake on the ground.\" width=\"484\" height=\"338\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.25b<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 481px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-2.jpg\" alt=\"Primate on the ground sees bird.\" width=\"481\" height=\"517\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.25c\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Figure 7.25a-c: Vervet monkeys respond in different ways to alarm calls for each of their three main predators (leopards, snakes, and eagles) which are appropriate to predator hunting strategies. Credit: Vervet Monkey Alarm Calls by Mary Nelson, original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Research on other African monkeys indicates that some species use alarm calls to signal to the predator that it has been detected. Diana monkeys (<em>Cercopithecus diana<\/em>) give alarm calls to leopards (<em>Panthera pardus<\/em>) but not chimpanzees (Zuberb\u00fchler, No\u00eb, &amp; Seyfarth 1997). Because leopards are stealth predators, they rely on the element of surprise to sneak up on their prey (Figure 7.26a). Alarm calling at leopards appears to tell the leopard that it has been seen and therefore its chance of success will be low. Research shows leopards are more likely to stop hunting after an alarm call has been emitted. Unlike leopards, chimpanzees are pursuit predators and may even use alarm calls to locate potential prey (Figure 7.26b). With such a predator, prey are better off remaining as silent as possible so as not to alert the predator to their location (Zuberb\u00fchler Et al. 1999).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_215\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-215\" style=\"width: 1907px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-215 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/6.26.jpg\" alt=\"Leopard crouches in grass. Chimpanzee looks up.\" width=\"1907\" height=\"589\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-215\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.26a-b: Because leopards (left) and chimpanzees (right) hunt differently, Diana monkeys react differently to them. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thimindu\/5842997328\">Crouching Leopard<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/thimindu\/\"> Thimindu Goonatillake<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\"> CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chimpanzee_in_the_wild.jpg\">Chimpanzee in the wild<\/a> by D.G. Kulakov is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/deed.en\"> CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The Question of Culture<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It may be surprising in a chapter on nonhuman primates to see a discussion of culture. After all, culture is considered by many, including cultural anthropologists, to be a distinguishing characteristic of humans. Indeed, some anthropologists question claims of culture in primates and other animals. Definitions of animal culture focus on specific behaviours that are unique to one population. Anthropological definitions of human culture emphasize shared ideology (e.g., values, morals, beliefs) and symbols, not just behaviour. Using this definition, some cultural anthropologists view primates as lacking culture because of the absence of symbolic life (e.g., religion). However, the longer we study primate groups and populations, the more insight we gain into primate behavioural variation. If we define <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1108\">culture<\/a><\/strong> as the transmission of behaviour from one generation to the next through social learning, then we must view at least some of the behavioural variation we see in primates as forms of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1110\">cultural tradition<\/a><\/strong>, or a distinctive pattern of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group that persists over time (Whiten 2001).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chimpanzee Culture<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Due to both their high level of intelligence and the large number of long-term studies on several different populations, chimpanzees provide the best example of cultural tradition in primates. Chimpanzees express cultural variation in multiple behavioural patterns, ranging from population-specific prey preferences and hunting strategies to tool-use techniques and social behaviours. For example, in Tanzania, chimpanzees fish for termites by stripping twigs and then poking the twigs into termite mounds. The termites react to the \u201cinvasion\u201d by attacking the twig. The chimpanzee pulls the twig out, termites attached, and eats them. In Gambia, they use modified twigs to extract honey from holes in trees. In Fongoli, S\u00e9n\u00e9gal, chimpanzees use sticks as \u201cspears\u201d that they stab into tree cavities to hunt for galagos (Figure 7.27). Multiple chimpanzee populations use a \u201chammer and anvil\u201d to crack open nuts, but the specific techniques differ. Because the cultural traditions are so diverse and unique, if a researcher can observe enough of a chimpanzee\u2019s behaviour, it is possible to assign that individual to a specific community, much in the same way a human being can be associated with a specific culture based on his or her behaviour (Whiten 2011).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-4.jpg\" alt=\"Chimpanzees hunting galagos by poking them with a stick.\" width=\"800\" height=\"453\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.27a-d: Tool-assisted hunting by a chimpanzee at Fongoli, S\u00e9n\u00e9gal. An adult male chimpanzee uses a tree branch with a modified end to (a\u2013c) stab into a cavity within a hollow tree branch that houses a galago. He ultimately captures the galago as (d) his adolescent brother looks on. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Pan_troglodytes,_tool_use_in_Senegal.jpg\">Pan troglodytes, tool use in Senegal<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/content\/2\/4\/140507\"> J. D. Pruetz, P. Bertolani, K. Boyer Ontl, S. Lindshield, M. Shelley, and E. G. Wessling<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">How do chimpanzee cultures develop, and how does cultural transmission occur? Although we do not know for sure how chimpanzee cultural traditions develop initially, it is possible that different groups invent, either accidentally or deliberately, certain behaviours that other individuals copy. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1112\">Immigration<\/a><\/strong>, or movement of an individual into a new group or community, is an important avenue of cultural transmission in chimpanzees, much as it is between human cultures. Immigrants (typically females) may bring cultural traditions to their new community, which residents observe and learn. Conversely, immigrants may observe and learn a cultural tradition practiced in their new community (Whiten 2011).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural Transmission in Macaques<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Two monkey species are well-known for behavioural variation that has been called \u201cpre-cultural\u201d by some primatologists: Japanese macaques and tufted capuchins (<em>Sapajus apella<\/em>). The transmission of unique <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1114\">foraging<\/a><\/strong> (the act of searching for food) behaviours through the members of a provisioned group of Japanese macaques on Koshima Island is well known (Matsuzawa 2015). In an effort to keep the monkeys nearby, researchers provided them with piles of sweet potatoes. A juvenile female named Imo spontaneously washed a muddy sweet potato in a stream. This new food-processing technique first spread among other juveniles and then gradually to older individuals. Within 30 years, it had spread across generations, and 46 of 57 monkeys in the group engaged in the behaviour. Another example comes from a group living far to the north, in Shiga-Heights, Nagano Prefecture. Researchers used apples to entice Japanese macaques to the area. Within a few years, monkeys visited the area regularly and were observed playing with the water in the hot springs. Soon, they climbed into the hot springs and learned to immerse themselves to keep warm and reduce stress when not foraging (Figure 7.28; Matsuzawa 2018; Takeshita Et al. 2018; recall also our discussion of hot spring use as an example of analogous traits at the beginning of this chapter). These examples share several characteristics with human culture, including invention or modification of behaviour, transmission of behaviour between individuals, and the persistence of the behaviour across generations (McGrew 1998).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 477px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-4.png\" alt=\"Two monkeys in a hot spring.\" width=\"477\" height=\"292\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7.28: Hot spring use by Japanese macaques is a culturally transmitted behaviour. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/peterthoeny\/32160301021\">Oooh, This Feels Sooo Good!<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/peterthoeny\/\">Peter Theony &#8211; Quality HD Photography<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Cultural Connections and Contemporary Implications<\/h2>\n<p>It is apparent that the study of primates, whose similarities to humans are striking, allows anthropologists and scientists to better understand our evolutionary past and to view humanity through a biological lens. As we have seen, one of the most compelling insights from primatology is the presence of culture within primate groups. As archaeologists continue to uncover ancient tools used by early hominins, parallel behaviours can be observed in several primate species today. Orangutans use sticks to scratch their backs, gorillas use branches to test water depth, and chimpanzees \u201cfish\u201d for termites, demonstrating object modification and task-specific planning. Likewise, capuchin monkeys use stones to dig (Lima, 2024), while long-tailed macaques use them to crack open nuts or even mollusks. These practices show how primates repurpose objects to achieve desired outcomes. If culture is defined as information acquired through social learning, then these forms of tool use represent not only innovation but cultural transmission. Primate archaeology suggests that such knowledge may be passed down across generations, sometimes primarily through females; for example, stone tools dated to around 4,300 years ago from the Ta\u00ef Forest contain starch residues from nuts still processed by chimpanzees in the region today. Perhaps most striking is evidence of deliberate medicinal behaviour known as zoopharmacognosy across multiple primate species (De la Fuente, M.2022). Capuchins rub themselves with citrus fruits containing antibacterial compounds or with millipedes that act as insect repellents. Lactating female sifakas consume tannin-rich plants with antiparasitic properties, and chimpanzees chew bitter pith to treat parasite-related illnesses. These behaviours suggest that many cultural abilities observed in early humans were not sudden innovations but rather developments rooted in cognitive and social capacities, as observed in primates today.<\/p>\n<h4>Discussion Questions<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>We&#8217;ve learned about how primates interact socially (affiliative\/agonistic), but what about humans? Would you say these interactions are culturally dependent? Suggest explanations.<\/li>\n<li>Do you believe that our biological makeup influences particular humans&#8217; cultural abilities? Explain.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Primates are socially complex, extremely intelligent, and highly adaptable. In this chapter we discussed aspects of primate ecology, including how body size and characteristics of food affect what primates eat and how primates interact with other species in their environment. We examined why primates live in groups, the types of groups in which they are found, and the reproductive strategies used by males and females to maximize reproductive success. Like other aspects of their behaviour, primate communication is varied and complex, and we discussed how primates communicate using vocal, visual, olfactory, and tactile signals. Finally, we explored the question of culture among nonhuman primates and learned that some species have cultural traditions, distinctive patterns of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group that persist over time. Humans and other primates are similar in many ways. Learning about principles of primate ecology and behaviour can help us better understand our own behaviour and the behaviours of our extinct relatives.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">If anthropology is the study of humans, why do some anthropologists study primates?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">How does a primate\u2019s ecology affect their diet and interactions with other organisms?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Why do primates live in groups and in what types of groups do they live?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is parental investment and sexual selection?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What are some examples of primate communication?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is the evidence for cultural traditions in primates and how do primatologists think cultural transmission occurs in primates?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Abundance<\/strong>: How much food is available in a given area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Adaptation<\/strong>: A trait with a function.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Affiliative<\/strong>: Nonaggressive social interactions and associations between individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agonistic<\/strong>: Conflict; aggressive interactions between individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Alarm calling<\/strong>: Vocalizations emitted by social animals in response to danger.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Analogy<\/strong>: A similar trait found in different species that arose independently.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anogenital<\/strong>: Relating to the anus and genitals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Breeding season<\/strong>: The time of year when females are receptive to mating.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Callitrichids<\/strong>: The primate family that includes marmosets and tamarins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carnivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of animal tissue.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Coalition<\/strong>: A temporary alliance between individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Community ecology<\/strong>: The branch of ecology that deals with the relationships and interactions between different organisms that occupy the same habitat.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Comparison<\/strong>: An examination of the similarities and differences between two things, such as two primate species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Conspecifics<\/strong>: Members of the same species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cooperative breeding<\/strong>: When individuals other than the mother and father help raise the offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Crypsis<\/strong>: The ability to avoid detection by other organisms, such as predators.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural tradition<\/strong>: A distinctive pattern of behaviour shared by multiple individuals in a social group, which persists over time and is acquired through social learning.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong>: The transmission of behaviour from one generation to the next through observation and imitation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Decolonize<\/strong>: Understanding and highlighting the theory and research of non-Western individuals and perspectives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Descendant<\/strong>: A species that comes after the ancestor species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Direct competition:<\/strong> Competition that involves physical interaction between individuals, such as fighting.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dispersal<\/strong>: To leave one\u2019s group or area. This may or may not involve joining another group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Distribution<\/strong>: How food is spread out.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diurnal<\/strong>: Active during the day.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominance hierarchy<\/strong>: The ranked organization of individuals established by the outcome of aggressive-submissive interactions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominant<\/strong>: Being of high rank.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ecology<\/strong>: The relationship between organisms and their physical surroundings.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ecotourism<\/strong>: A form of tourism that focuses on nature-based attractions to provide learning opportunities and that uses economically and ecologically sustainable practices.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethology<\/strong>: The study of animal behaviour.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fission-fusion<\/strong>: Societies in which group composition is flexible, such as chimpanzee and spider monkey societies. Individuals may break up into smaller feeding groups (fission) and combine into larger groups (fusion).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fitness<\/strong>: An individual\u2019s ability to survive and reproduce relative to other members of the same species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Folivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of leaves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraging<\/strong>: The act of searching for food.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Frugivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists primarily of fruit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grooming<\/strong>: Picking through the fur of another individual for cleaning or bonding purposes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterospecifics<\/strong>: Members of different species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Holism<\/strong>: The idea that the parts of a system interconnect and interact to make up the whole.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Home range<\/strong>: The area that a group or individual uses over a given period of time (often over a year).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homology<\/strong>: A similar trait found in different species because it was inherited from a common ancestor.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Immigration<\/strong>: Movement of an individual into a new group or community.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Indirect competition<\/strong>: Competition that does not involve physical interaction between individuals, such as eating food before another individual arrives at the food site.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Infanticide<\/strong>: The killing of infants of one\u2019s own species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Innate<\/strong>: Natural; as in behaviour that comes naturally.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insectivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diets consist primarily of insects.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interbirth interval<\/strong>: The typical length of time between one birth and the next for a species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Intersexual selection<\/strong>: The selection for traits that enhance the ability of the members of one sex to attract the attention of the other.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Intrasexual selection<\/strong>: Selection for traits that enhance the ability of members of one sex to compete amongst themselves.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mating system<\/strong>: A way of describing which male(s) and female(s) mate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Metabolism<\/strong>: The chemical changes that take place in an organism that turn nutrients into energy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mobbing<\/strong>: Cooperatively attacking or harassing a predator.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monogamy<\/strong>: A mating system in which one male mates with one female.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Multi-male, multi-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of multiple adult males, multiple adult females, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Multi-male, single-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of two or more adult males, one breeding female, their dependent offspring, and non-breeding females.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutualistic\/mutualism<\/strong>: When different species work together, with each benefiting from the interaction.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Niche<\/strong>: The role of a species in its environment; how it meets its needs for food, shelter, etc.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nocturnal<\/strong>: Active at night.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Olfactory communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through scent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Omnivores<\/strong>: Organisms whose diet consists of plant and animal matter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pair bond<\/strong>: A strong, long-term relationship between two individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parasite<\/strong>: An organism that lives in or on another organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Parental investment<\/strong>: Any time or energy a parent devotes to the current offspring that enhances its survival (and eventual reproductive success) at the expense of the parent\u2019s ability to invest in the next offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Philopatric<\/strong>: Remaining in the group of one\u2019s birth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Piloerection<\/strong>: Raising one\u2019s hair or fur in an effort to look bigger.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polyandry<\/strong>: A mating system in which multiple males mate with a single breeding female.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygamy<\/strong>: A mating system in which multiple males mate with multiple females.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygyny<\/strong>: A mating system in which one male mates with multiple females.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polyspecific association<\/strong>: An association between two or more different species that involves behavioural changes in at least one of them to maintain the association.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primate community<\/strong>: All primate species that occur in an area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primatologist<\/strong>: A scientist who studies primate behaviour and\/or ecology.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Primatology<\/strong>: The scientific field that studies primate behaviour and\/or ecology.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ranging behaviour<\/strong>: Refers to the way in which animals move about their environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Receptive<\/strong>: A term used to describe females who are ready for sexual reproduction (i.e., not pregnant or nursing).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Reproductive success<\/strong>: An individual\u2019s genetic contribution to future generations, often measured through the number of offspring produced.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Reproductive suppression<\/strong>: The prevention or inhibition of reproduction of healthy adults.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Resident male<\/strong>: Term that describes the male who lives with a group of females.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Seed dispersal<\/strong>: The process by which seeds move away from the plant that produced them in preparation for germination and becoming a new plant.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Semantic communication<\/strong>: The systematic use of signals to refer to objects in the environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual dimorphism<\/strong>: When males and females of a species have different morphological traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual selection<\/strong>: The selection for traits that increase mating success. This occurs via intersexual selection and intrasexual selection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexual swelling<\/strong>: Area of the hindquarters that change in size, shape, and often colour over the course of a female\u2019s reproductive cycle, reaching maximum size at ovulation. Occurs in many primate species that live in Africa and Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sexually monomorphic<\/strong>: When males and females of a species have similar morphological traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Single-male, multi-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of one adult male, multiple adult female, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Single-male, single-female<\/strong>: A group that consists of one adult male, one adult female, and their dependent offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social learning<\/strong>: The idea that new behaviours can be acquired by observing and imitating others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social system<\/strong>: A way of describing the typical number of males and females of all age classes that live together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Social transmission<\/strong>: Transfer of something from one individual to another; this can include parasites, information, or cultural traditions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sociality<\/strong>: The tendency to form social groups.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Solitary<\/strong>: Living alone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species recognition<\/strong>: The ability to differentiate conspecifics from members of other species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Subordinate<\/strong>: Being of low rank.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tactile communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through touch.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Territory:<\/strong> A home range whose boundary is defended from intrusion by conspecifics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vertebrates<\/strong>: The group of animals characterized by an internal spinal column or backbone. This includes fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vigilance<\/strong>: Watchful behaviour used to detect potential danger, usually in the form of predators or potential competitors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Visual communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through signals that can be seen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Vocal communication<\/strong>: Conveying information through signals that can be heard.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Goodall, Jane. 1971. <em>In the Shadow of Man<\/em>. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rowe, Noel, and Marc Myers, eds. 2016. <em>All the World\u2019s Primates. <\/em>Charleston, RI: Pogonias Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Strier, Karen B. 2017. <em>Primate Behavioural Ecology.<\/em> 5th ed. New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pin.primate.wisc.edu\/\">Primate Info Net<\/a> is an information service of the National Primate Research Center at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. It includes Primate Factsheets, primate news and publications, a list of primate-related jobs, and an international directory of primatology, among other information.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.primate-sg.org\/\">Primate Specialist Group<\/a> is a collection of scientists and conservationists who work in dozens of African, Asian, and Latin American nations to promote research on primate conservation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short videos of some primate behaviours discussed in this chapter:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch vervet monkeys respond to different types of predators: BBC One. n.d. \u201cVervet Monkey\u2019s Escape Plans &#8211; Talk to the Animals: Episode 2 Preview.\u201d Accessed December 16, 2022. <a class=\"rId10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=q8ZG8Dpc8mM\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=q8ZG8Dpc8mM. <\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch male gelada baboons use the lip flip in competition with other males: Smithsonian Channel, June 9, 2017. \u201cWhy These Vegetarian Monkeys Have Sharp Predator Teeth.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?time_continue=145&amp;v=aC6iYj_EBjY\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?time_continue=145&amp;v=aC6iYj_EBjY<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch (and listen to!) howler monkeys \u201croar\u201d: Science News. N.d. \u201cHear a Male Howler Monkey Roar.\u201d Accessed November 21, 2022. <a class=\"rId12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PYar0dkZ6v8\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PYar0dkZ6v8<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch Japanese macaques using natural hot springs: National Geographic. N.d. \u201cMeditative Snow Monkeys Hang Out in Hot Springs.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Aat9O85ynsI\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Aat9O85ynsI<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Watch chimpanzees make and use tools: National Geographic. n.d. \u201cChimps and Tools.\u201d Accessed July 25, 2019. <a class=\"rId14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o2TBicMRLtA\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o2TBicMRLtA<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Aich, H., R. Moos-Heilen, and E. Zimmermann. 1990. \u201cVocalizations of Adult Gelada Baboons (<em>Theropithecus gelada<\/em>): Acoustic Structure and Behavioural Context.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 55 (3\u20134): 109\u2013132.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bell, Sarah A. 2017. \u201cGaldikas, Birute.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 445\u2013446. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Boinski, S. 1992. \u201cOlfactory Communication among Costa Rican Squirrel Monkeys: A Field Study.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 59 (3): 127\u2013136.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cheney, D. L., and R. M. Seyfarth. 1987. \u201cThe Influence of Intergroup Competition on the Survival and Reproduction of Female Vervet Monkeys.\u201d <em>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology<\/em> 21 (6): 375\u2013386.<\/p>\n<p>De la Fuente, M. F., Souto, A., Albuquerque, U. P., &amp; Schiel, N. (2022). Self\u2010medication in nonhuman primates: A systematic evaluation of the possible function of the use of medicinal plants. <em>American Journal of Primatology,<\/em> 84, e23438. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajp.23438\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajp.23438<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">de Oliveira Terceiro, Francisco Edvaldo, and Judith M. Burkart. 2019. \u201cCooperative Breeding.\u201d In <em>Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior<\/em>, edited by Jennifer Vonk and Todd Shackelford, 1\u20136. Edinburg, Scotland: Springer Cham.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Digby, Leslie J., Stephen F. Ferrari, and Wendy Saltzman. 2011. \u201cCallitrichines: The Role of Competition in Cooperatively Breeding Species.\u201d In <em>Primates in Perspective<\/em>, edited by Christina J. Campbell, August\u00cdn Fuentes, Katherine C. MacKinnon, Simon K. Bearder, and Rebecca M. Stumpf, 91\u201310. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fischer, Julia, Kurt Hammerschmidt, Dorothy L. Cheney, and Robert M. Seyfarth. 2008. \u201cAcoustic Features of Female Chacma Baboon Barks.\u201d <em>Ethology<\/em> 107 (1): 33\u201354.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jolly, Alison. 1966. <em>Lemur Behavior: A Madagascar Field Study<\/em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Krief, Sabrina, Claude Marcel Hladik, and Claudie Haxaire. 2005. \u201cEthnomedicinal and Bioactive Properties of Plants Ingested by Wild Chimpanzees in Uganda.\u201d <em>Journal of Ethnopharmacology<\/em> 110 (1\u20133): 1\u201315.<\/p>\n<p>Lima, <a href=\"https:\/\/concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org\/search?queryString=au%3D%22Lima%2C%20Geovana%20C%20B%22&amp;databaseList=&amp;idDetect=false&amp;citeDetect=false&amp;clusterResults=true&amp;groupVariantRecords=false&amp;newsArticles=off&amp;bookReviews=off\" target=\"_self\">Geovana C B <\/a>et al. (2024) <a href=\"https:\/\/concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org\/search\/detail\/10280646190?queryString=stone%20tool%20use%20in%20Capuchin%20monkeys&amp;databaseList=\">A new addition to the toolbox: <strong>stone tool use<\/strong> in blonde\u00a0<strong>capuchin<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>monkey<\/strong><strong>s<\/strong>\u00a0(Sapajus flavius). <em>Primates; journal of primatology\u00a0 <\/em>65(5) (202409): 383-389.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Maekawa, Mkio, Annette Lanjouw, Eug\u00e8ne Rutagarama, and Doublas Sharp. 2013. \u201cMountain Gorilla Tourism Generating Wealth and Peace in Post-Conflict Rwanda.\u201d <em>Natural Resources Forum<\/em> 37 (2): 127\u2013137.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Matsuzawa, Tetsuro. 2015. \u201cSweet-Potato Washing Revisited: 50th Anniversary of the <em>Primates<\/em> Article.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 56: 285\u2013287.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Matsuzawa, Tetsuro. 2018. \u201cHot-Spring Bathing of Wild Monkeys in Shiga-Heights: Origin and Propagation of a Cultural Behavior.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 59: 209\u2013213.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">McGrew, W. C. 1998. \u201cCulture in Nonhuman Primates?\u201d <em>Annual Review of Anthropology<\/em> 27: 301\u2013328.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mertl-Millhollen, Anne S. 1988. \u201cOlfactory Demarcation of Territorial but Not Home Range Boundaries by <em>Lemur catta<\/em>.\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 50 (3\u20134): 175\u2013187.<\/p>\n<p>Mercader J, et al. (2007) \u00a0\u00a04,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. <em>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S<\/em> A. Feb 27;104(9):3043-8. doi: 10.1073\/pnas.0607909104. Epub 2007 Feb 20. PMID: 17360606; PMCID: PMC1805589.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pinacho-Guendulain, B., and G. Ramos-Fern\u00e1ndez. 2017. \u201cInfluence of Fruit Availability on the Fission-Fusion Dynamics of Spider Monkeys (<em>Ateles geoffroyi<\/em>).\u201d <em>International Journal of Primatology<\/em> 38: 466\u2013484.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Poirotte, Cl\u00e9mence, Fran\u00e7ois Massol, Ana\u00efs Herbert, Eric Willaume, Pacelle M. Bomo, Peter M. Kappeler, and Marie J. E. Charpentier. 2017. \u201cMandrills Use Olfaction to Socially Avoid Parasitized Conspicifics.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 3 (4): e160172.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rodrigues, Michelle. 2019. \u201cIt\u2019s Time to Stop Lionizing Dian Fossey as a Conservation Hero.\u201d <em>Lady Science<\/em> website, September 20. Accessed December 14, 2022. <a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ladyscience.com\/ideas\/time-to-stop-lionizing-dian-fossey-conservation\">https:\/\/www.ladyscience.com\/ideas\/time-to-stop-lionizing-dian-fossey-conservation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Samuni, Liran, Anna Preis, Tobias Deschner, Catherine Crockford, and Roman M. Wittig. 2018. \u201cReward of Labor Coordination and Hunting Success in Wild Chimpanzees.\u201d <em>Communications Biology<\/em> 1: 138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Santana, Sharlene E., Jessica Lynch Alfaro, and Michael E. Alfaro. 2012. \u201cAdaptive Evolution of Facial Colour Patterns in Neotropical Primates.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 279 (1736): 2204\u20132211.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sanz, Crickette M., David Strait, Crepin Eyana Ayina, Jean Marie Massamba, Thierry Fabrice Ebombi, Severin Ndassoba Kialiema, Delon Ngoteni, et al. 2022. \u201cInterspecific Interactions Between Sympatric Apes.\u201d i<em>Science<\/em> 25 (10): 105059.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sch\u00f6n Ybarra, M. A. 1986. \u201cLoud Calls of Adult Male Red Howling Monkeys (<em>Alouatta seniculus<\/em>).\u201d <em>Folia Primatologica<\/em> 47 (4): 204\u2013216.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Setchell, Joanna M., Tessa Smith, E. Jean Wickings, and Leslie A. Knapp. 2008. \u201cSocial Correlates of Testosterone and Ornamentation in Male Mandrills.\u201d <em>Hormones and Behavior<\/em> 54 (3): 365\u2013372.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Setchell, Joanna M., E. Jean Wickings, and Leslie A. Knapp. 2006. \u201cSignal Content of Red Facial Coloration in Female Mandrills (<em>Mandrillus sphinx<\/em>).\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em><a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/paperpile.com\/b\/Gb7Zko\/Lxpl\"> 273 (1599): 2395\u20132400.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Seyfarth, R. M., D. L. Cheney, and P. Marler. 1980a. \u201cMonkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 210 (4471): 801\u2013803.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney, and Peter Marler. 1980b. \u201cVervet Monkey Alarm Calls: Semantic Communication in a Free-Ranging Primate.\u201d <em>Animal Behaviour<\/em> 28 (4): 1070\u20131094.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sharma, Goutam, Chan Ram, and Lal Singh Rajpurohit. 2010. \u201cA Case Study of Infantcide After Resident Male Replacement in <em>Semnopithecus entellus<\/em> around Jodhpur (India).\u201d <em>Proceeding of the Zoological Society<\/em> 63 (2): 93\u201398.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Shirasu, Mika, Satomi Ito, Akihiro Itoigawa, Takashi Hayakawa, Kodzue Kinoshita, Isao Munechika, Hiroo Imai, and Kazushige Touhara. 2020. \u201cKey Male Glandular Odorants Attracting Female Ring-Tailed Lemurs.\u201d <em>Current Biology<\/em> 30 (11): 2131\u20132138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stanford, Craig B. 2017. \u201cGoodall, Jane.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 471\u2013472. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stewart, Kelly. 2017. \u201cFossey, Dian.\u201d In <em>The International Encyclopedia of Primatology, Volume A\u2013G<\/em>, edited by Agust\u00edn Fuentes, 432\u2013433. Malden, MA: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Takeshita, Rafaela S.C., Fred B. Bercovitch, Kodzue Kinoshita, and Michael A. Huffman. 2018. \u201cBeneficial Effect of Hot Spring Bathing on Stress Levels in Japanese Macaques.\u201d <em>Primates<\/em> 59 (3): 215\u2013225.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trivers, Robert L. 1972. \u201cParental Investment and Sexual Selection.\u201d In <em>Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871\u20131971<\/em>, edited by Bernard Campbell, 136\u2013179. Chicago: Aldine.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Whiten, Andrew. 2011. \u201cThe Scope of Culture in Chimpanzees, Humans and Ancestral Apes.\u201d <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 366 (1567): 997\u20131007.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wiens, Frank, and Annette Zitzmann. 2003. \u201cSocial Structure of the Solitary Slow Loris <em>Nycticebus coucang<\/em> (Lorisidae).\u201d <em>Journal of Zoology<\/em> 261 (1): 35\u201346.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zuberb\u00fchler, Klaus, David Jenny, and Redouan Bshary. 1999. \u201cThe Predator Deterrence Function of Primate Alarm Calls.\u201d <em>Ethology<\/em> 105 (6): 477\u2013490.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zuberb\u00fchler, Klaus, Ronald No\u00eb, and Robert M. Seyfarth. 1997. \u201cDiana Monkey Long-Distance Calls: Messages for Conspecifics and Predators.\u201d <em>Animal Behaviour<\/em> 53 (3): 589\u2013604.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Acknowledgements<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The author is grateful to the editors for the opportunity to contribute to this open-source textbook. She thanks Dr. Stephanie Etting for her encouragement and support during the revision of this chapter. Her suggestions, along with comments made by two anonymous reviewers on an earlier draft of this chapter, improved the final version considerably. Finally, she thanks all the primatologists who came before her, especially her advisor, Lynne A. Isbell, for their tireless efforts to understand the behavior and ecology of the living primates. Without their work, this chapter would not have been possible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"glossary\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\" id=\"definition\">definition<\/span><template id=\"term_1678_928\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_928\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>\/*increase font size of navigation bar*\/<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__previous a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.a11y-fontsize, .a11y-fontsize:focus, .a11y-fontsize:hover, a11y-fontsize:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.a11y-fontsize.focus,.a11y-fontsize:focus,.a11y-fontsize:hover {<br \/>\n  background-color: #dfeccf;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n  text-decoration: underline;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up {<br \/>\n    background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color:  #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:focus {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action.focus,.call-to-action:focus,.call-to-action:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color: #6dc5c9;<br \/>\n    border-color: #000;<br \/>\n    color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading {<br \/>\n  background-color: #3FA6AA;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading_next a:focus,.nav-reading_previous a:focus {<br \/>\n  background: #6dc5c9 !important;<br \/>\n    color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a:hover,.nav-reading__previous a:hover {<br \/>\n    background: #e9e3d3 !important;<br \/>\n  color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* Background color for textboxes. *\/<\/p>\n<p>:root {<br \/>\n  --lightblue: #D7F4F7;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.no-borders {<br \/>\n  border: none;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* white text for learning objectives *\/<br \/>\ntextbox__title{<br \/>\n  color: white<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h1, h2, h3, h4 {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_930\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_930\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>\/*increase font size of navigation bar*\/<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__previous a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.a11y-fontsize, .a11y-fontsize:focus, .a11y-fontsize:hover, a11y-fontsize:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.a11y-fontsize.focus,.a11y-fontsize:focus,.a11y-fontsize:hover {<br \/>\n  background-color: #dfeccf;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n  text-decoration: underline;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up {<br \/>\n    background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color:  #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:focus {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action.focus,.call-to-action:focus,.call-to-action:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color: #6dc5c9;<br \/>\n    border-color: #000;<br \/>\n    color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading {<br \/>\n  background-color: #3FA6AA;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading_next a:focus,.nav-reading_previous a:focus {<br \/>\n  background: #6dc5c9 !important;<br \/>\n    color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a:hover,.nav-reading__previous a:hover {<br \/>\n    background: #e9e3d3 !important;<br \/>\n  color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* Background color for textboxes. *\/<\/p>\n<p>:root {<br \/>\n  --lightblue: #D7F4F7;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.no-borders {<br \/>\n  border: none;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* white text for learning objectives *\/<br \/>\ntextbox__title{<br \/>\n  color: white<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h1, h2, h3, h4 {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>entry-title {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_932\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_932\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>\/*increase font size of navigation bar*\/<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__previous a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.a11y-fontsize, .a11y-fontsize:focus, .a11y-fontsize:hover, a11y-fontsize:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.a11y-fontsize.focus,.a11y-fontsize:focus,.a11y-fontsize:hover {<br \/>\n  background-color: #dfeccf;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n  text-decoration: underline;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up {<br \/>\n    background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color:  #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:focus {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action.focus,.call-to-action:focus,.call-to-action:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color: #6dc5c9;<br \/>\n    border-color: #000;<br \/>\n    color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading {<br \/>\n  background-color: #3FA6AA;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading_next a:focus,.nav-reading_previous a:focus {<br \/>\n  background: #6dc5c9 !important;<br \/>\n    color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a:hover,.nav-reading__previous a:hover {<br \/>\n    background: #e9e3d3 !important;<br \/>\n  color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* Background color for textboxes. *\/<\/p>\n<p>:root {<br \/>\n  --lightblue: #D7F4F7;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.no-borders {<br \/>\n  border: none;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* white text for learning objectives *\/<br \/>\ntextbox__title{<br \/>\n  color: white;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h1, h2, h3, h4 {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>entry-title {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_934\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_934\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p>Katie Nelson, Ph.D., Inver Hills Community College<\/p>\n<p>Lara Braff, Ph.D., Grossmont College<\/p>\n<p>Beth Shook, Ph.D., California State University, Chico<\/p>\n<p>Kelsie Aguilera, M.A., University of Hawai\u2018i: Leeward Community College<\/p>\n<p><em>This chapter is a section of a revision from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-2\/\">Chapter 1: Introduction to Biological Anthropology<\/a>\u201d by Katie Nelson, Lara Braff, Beth Shook, and Kelsie Aguilera. In <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\">CC BY-NC 4.0<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain key components of the scientific method.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Differentiate between hypotheses, theories, and laws.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Differentiate science from other ways of knowing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Anthropologists as Scientists<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Biological anthropologists use the scientific method as a way of learning about the world around them. Many people think of science as taking place in a sterile laboratory, but in biological anthropology it is just as likely to occur somewhere else, such as at a research station in Ethiopia, a field site in Tanzania, or a town in El Salvador. To understand how information in this field is established, it is important to recognize what science is and is not, as well as to understand how the scientific method actually works.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Recognizing <\/strong><strong>Science<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Science combines our natural curiosity with our ability to experiment so we can understand the world around us and address needs in our communities. Thanks to science, meteorologists can predict the weather, it takes a relatively small number of farmers to grow enough food to feed our large population, our medicine continues to improve, and over half of the world\u2019s population owns a cell phone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Anyone can participate in science\u2014not just academics. In fact, children are often some of the best scientists (Figure 1.15). An early, well-known psychologist, Jean Piaget (1896\u20131980), argued that a child is a \u201clittle scientist,\u201d internally motivated to experiment and explore their world. This can be seen when an infant repeatedly drops a toy to see if the parent will pick it up, or when a four-year-old sincerely asks \u201cwhy\u201d again and again. Maria Montessori (1870\u20131952), an Italian doctor and educator, was interested in how children learn. Through her research, she also recognized that children have natural scientific tendencies. Children have a desire to explore their environment, ask questions, use their imaginations, and learn by doing. In 1907, Montessori opened a school to foster children\u2019s natural desire to learn this way. This developed a child-centered teaching method that has spread around the world and is being used in over 22,000 schools today. In anthropology and other scientific fields, the process of learning is more formalized, but scientists still benefit from the curiosity that motivates children and still experience the thrill of discovery.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 365px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19.jpg\" alt=\"Toddler presses their hands and face against a large window.\" width=\"365\" height=\"243\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1.15: Children are true scientists as they explore and test the world around them through sight and touch. Credit: Child Scientist at Window original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Science represents both a body of knowledge and the process for learning that knowledge (the scientific method). Scientific claims can, at times, be difficult to distinguish from other information. Science also incorporates a broad range of methods to collect data, adding to the difficulty of knowing what science really is. This section will address four key characteristics that help us define and recognize science: (1) science studies the physical and natural world and how it works, (2) scientific explanations must be testable and refutable, (3) science relies on <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_808\">empirical<\/a><\/strong> (observable) evidence, and (4) science involves the scientific community.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Science Studies the Physical and Natural World and How It Works<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Our physical and natural universe ranges from very small (e.g., electrons) to very large (e.g., Earth itself and the galaxies beyond it). Scientists often design their research to address how and why natural forces influence our physical and natural world. In biological anthropology, we focus our questions on humans as well as other primate species, both living and extinct. We ask questions like: What influences a primate\u2019s diet? Why do humans walk on two legs? And did Neanderthals and modern humans interbreed?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are very few questions that are considered off-limits in science. That being said, the scope of scientific investigation is generally focused on <em>natural<\/em> phenomena and <em>natural<\/em> processes and excludes the supernatural. People often regard the supernatural, whether it be a ghost, luck, or god, as working outside the laws of the universe, which makes it difficult to study with a scientific approach. Science neither supports nor contradicts the existence of supernatural powers\u2014it simply does not include the supernatural in its explanations.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Scientific Explanations Must Be Testable and Refutable<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The goal of scientists is to identify a research question and then identify the best answer(s) to that question. For example, an excavation of a cemetery may reveal that many people buried there had unhealed fractures when they died, leading the anthropologist to ask: \u201cWhy did this population experience more broken bones than their neighbors?\u201d There might be multiple explanations to address this question, such as a lack of calcium in their diets, participation in dangerous work, or violent conflict with neighbors; these explanations are considered hypotheses. In the past, you might have learned that a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_810\">hypothesis<\/a><\/strong> is an \u201ceducated guess,\u201d but in science, hypotheses are much more than that. A scientific hypothesis reflects a scientist\u2019s knowledge-based experiences and background research. A hypothesis is better defined as an explanation of observed facts; hypotheses explain how and why observed phenomena are the way they are.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientific hypotheses should generate expectations that are <em>testable<\/em><em>. <\/em>For example, if the best explanation regarding our cemetery population was that they were experiencing violent conflict with their neighbors, we should expect to find clues, like weapons or protective walls around their homes, in the anthropological record to support this. Alternatively, if this population did not experience violent conflict with their neighbors, we may eventually be able to gather enough evidence to rule out (refute) this explanation. An important part of science is rigorous testing. Science <em>does not prove<\/em> any hypothesis. However, a strong hypothesis is one that has strong supporting evidence and has not yet been disproven.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Science Relies on Empirical Evidence<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The word <em>emp<\/em><em>irical<\/em> refers to experience that is verified by observation (rather than evidence that derives primarily from logic or theory). In anthropology, much evidence about our world is collected by observation through fieldwork or in a laboratory. The most reliable studies are based on accurately and precisely recorded observations. Scientists value studies that explain exactly what methods were used so that their data collection and analysis processes are reproducible. This allows for other scientists to expand the study or provide new insights into the observations.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Science Involves the Scientific Community<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Contrary to many Hollywood science fiction films, good science is not carried out in isolation in a secret basement laboratory; rather, it is done as part of a community. Scientists pay attention to what others have done before them, present new ideas to each other, and publish in scientific journals. Most scientific research is collaborative, bringing together researchers with different types of specialized knowledge to work on a shared project. Today, thanks to technology, scientific projects can bring together researchers from different backgrounds, experiences, locations, and perspectives. Most big anthropological questions such as \u201cWhere did modern humans develop?,\u201d \u201cWhat genetic changes make us uniquely human?,\u201d and \u201cHow did cooperative behavior evolve?\u201d cannot be addressed with one simple study but are tested with different lines of evidence and by different scientists over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Working within a scientific community supports one of the most valuable aspects of science: that <em>science is self-correcting<\/em>. Science that is openly communicated with others allows for a system with checks and balances: competing explanations can be proposed and questionable studies can be reevaluated. Ultimately, the goal is that through science the best explanations will stand the test of time.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>How Science Works: The Scientific Method<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Most students have learned the scientific method as a simple linear, or perhaps circular, process (see, e.g., Figure 1.16). Typically, the process is said to begin with making observations about the natural world. This leads to the development of a scientific hypothesis. From the hypothesis a set of predictions can be made, which are then tested by experimentation or by making additional observations. Scientific predictions are often phrased as \u201cif... then\u2026\u201d statements, such as \u201cIf hypothesis A is true, then this experiment will show outcome B.\u201d The results of a scientific study should then either support or reject the hypothesis.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 558px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3.png\" alt=\"Five text boxes depict the steps in the scientific method.\" width=\"558\" height=\"102\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1.16: Simple depiction of the scientific method. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-2\/\">Simple depiction of the scientific method (Figure 1.23)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">This simple version of the scientific method is valuable because it highlights the key aspects that should be present in any scientific research experiment or scientific paper. However, this simplistic view does not accurately represent the dynamic and creative side of science, nor does it identify the complex steps that are incorporated into a scientist\u2019s routine.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 523px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4.png\" alt=\"Circles and arrows depict the more complex process of how science works.\" width=\"523\" height=\"676\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1.17: Complex flow of the scientific method. <a href=\"https:\/\/undsci.berkeley.edu\/the-understanding-science-flowchart-text-description\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description is available from Understanding Science<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/undsci.berkeley.edu\/teaching\/teachingtools.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complex Science Flowchart<\/a> (2022) by <a href=\"https:\/\/undsci.berkeley.edu\/\">Understanding Science, University of California Museum of Paleontology<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Figure 1.17 provides an alternative representation of the scientific method that emphasizes the many paths to scientific discovery. While still incorporating the key components of making observations, testing ideas, and interpreting results, this chart shows that scientific ideas have many possible starting points and influences, and scientists often repeat steps and circle back around. Gathering evidence does not always rest on experiments in the laboratory. Evaluating data is not always clear-cut, and results are sometimes surprising or inconclusive. Many important discoveries were in fact made by mistake. For example, engineer Percy Spencer accidentally melted a chocolate bar in his pocket with a magnetron, which became the first microwave, and Spencer Silver invented the adhesive for 3M Post-it \u00ae notes while trying to develop a strong glue. The real scientific process is more similar to the philosophy of the animated television character Ms. Frizzle from <em>The Magic School Bus<\/em>, \u201cTake chances, make mistakes, get messy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Two key components lacking in the simple version of the scientific method are exploration and discovery. There are many reasons that a scientist might choose a particular research question: they may be motivated by personal experience, struck by something they read, or inspired by a student\u2019s question in class. Often scientific research reveals more questions than answers, so experienced researchers rarely lack problems to solve. But identifying a research question is just part of the process; most scientists spend more time exploring the literature, sharing ideas, asking questions, and planning their research project than conducting the test itself.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Science itself is a social enterprise that is influenced by cultural issues and values, as well as funding priorities. For example, corporations are the biggest funders of scientific research, followed by government agencies such as the National Science Foundation (which also fund many research projects done at colleges and universities). Those organizations have great influence on what is considered valuable research at any given time. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified many diseases as \u201cneglected tropical diseases,\u201d including dengue, leprosy, rabies, and hookworm. Together these diseases affect an estimated one billion people, mostly in impoverished areas. While these debilitating tropical diseases can be as deadly as diseases that receive more attention, like AIDS and tuberculosis, they receive comparatively little funding due to political priorities (Farmer et al. 2013).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Also important to the scientific process are interactions within the scientific community. Scientific collaboration can take place through informal discussion over a cup of coffee as well as more formal interactions, such as presenting at conferences and engaging in <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_812\">scholarly peer review<\/a><\/strong>. Scholarly peer review describes the process whereby an author\u2019s work must pass the scrutiny of other experts in the field before being accepted for publication in a journal or book. This helps keep scientists accountable for ethically responsible research projects and papers. Additionally, presenting data at conferences and in articles and books allows researchers to receive critical feedback from academic peers and others to test these ideas and further the field of science toward identifying the best explanations. It is important that the scientific field include researchers with diverse identities, backgrounds, and experiences so that researchers ask new questions, innovate, and problem solve more effectively.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hypotheses, Theories, and Laws<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientific investigation occurs at many levels, from investigating individual cases (e.g., \u201cWhat is causing this child\u2019s mysterious illness?\u201d) to understanding processes that affect most of us (\u201cWhat is the ideal amount of sleep for an adult?\u201d). All of these questions are important and will generate different types of testable scientific explanations. So far, we have used the term <em>hypothesis<\/em> to describe these scientific ideas about why observed phenomena are the way they are. Hypotheses are typically explanations that address a narrow set of phenomena, such as (in anthropology) a particular human population or primate species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In science, a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_814\">theory<\/a> <\/strong>is an explanation of observations that addresses a wide range of phenomena. Like hypotheses, theories also explain how or why something occurs, rely on empirical evidence, and are testable and able to be refuted. Because the term <em>theory<\/em> is often used casually outside of science, you may hear people try to dismiss a scientific claim as \u201cjust a theory.\u201d In science there are often multiple competing theories, but over time some are eliminated, leaving standing the theory or theories that best explain the most evidence. Scientific theories that have stood the test of time are thus supported by many lines of evidence and are usually reliable. Some well-tested theories accepted by most scientists include the theory of general relativity, which explains the law of gravitation and its relation to other forces, and evolutionary theory, which describes how heritable traits can change in a population over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While scientific hypotheses and theories share many characteristics, laws are quite different. A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_816\">law<\/a> <\/strong>is a <em>prediction<\/em> about what will happen given certain conditions, <em>not<\/em> an explanation for how or why it happens. A law is not a \u201cmature\u201d version of a theory. For example, Newton\u2019s universal law of gravity allows us to predict the gravitational force (F) between any two objects using the equation F=G(m<sub>1<\/sub>m<sub>2<\/sub>)\/r<sup>2<\/sup>, but it does not explain <em>why<\/em> gravity works. Laws are often mathematical, and some well-known laws include Newton\u2019s three laws of motion and Mendel\u2019s laws of genetic inheritance. Laws are important, and their discovery often promotes the development of theories.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 290px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8.png\" alt=\"People with surprised expressions stand as a naked man runs by.\" width=\"290\" height=\"174\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1.18: Archimedes is portrayed here having just discovered his Principle of Buoyancy. The vignette is by Count Giammaria Mazzuchelli (1707\u20131765). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Eureka!_Archimede.jpg\">Eureka! Archimede<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ssplprints.com\/\">Science and Society Piture Library Prints<\/a> is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>. [This image is a faithful photographic reproduction of \u201cArchimedes' Principle\u201d vignette from \"Historical and Critical Information about the Life, Inventions and Writings of Archimedes of Syracuse\" by Count Giammaria Mazzuchelli (1707\u20131765), published in Brescia, Italy in 1737.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To demonstrate how important laws can be\u2014and to show how unusual things can inspire scientific discoveries\u2014we can use the story of the ancient Greek mathematician and inventor Archimedes (Figure 1.18). Archimedes\u2019s buoyancy principle is a law that is useful for many things, including density calculations and designing ships. Purportedly, he made this discovery when he noticed the water level rise in the bathtub when he climbed in it. Realizing its importance, he is said to have shouted \u201cEureka\u201d and proceeded to run naked through the city of Syracuse. While this fun story may or may not be true, it does remain that scientific laws, alongside scientific hypotheses and theories, have a very important role in the scientific process and in generating scientific explanations about our natural world.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Ways of Knowing: Science, Faith, and Anthropology<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In anthropology, we recognize that there are many ways of knowing things. For instance, you might know that fingernails are softer than metal because as a child you accidentally stapled through your fingernail while doing an art project (a coauthor of this textbook once experienced this). This would be an example of knowledge you gained through experience. You might also know that inserting a knife into an electrical outlet is dangerous and could greatly harm you. Hopefully you learned this not from personal experience but through instruction from parents, teachers, and others in your social group. The degree to which humans rely on and benefit from the experiential knowledge of others is an important characteristic of what makes us human.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A unified way of knowing that is shared by a group of people and used to explain and predict phenomena is called a<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_818\">knowledge system<\/a><\/strong>. Human knowledge systems are diverse and reflect the wide range of cultures and societies throughout the world and through time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Science and religion are both knowledge systems. Yet they differ in important ways. The type of knowledge gained from science is often called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_820\">scientific understanding<\/a><\/strong>. As we have explored in the previous section, scientific understanding can change and relies on evidence and rigorous, repeated testing. Religious or spiritual ways of knowing are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_822\">belief<\/a><\/strong>, which is different from scientific understanding because they do not require repeated testing or validation (although they can rely on observations and experiences). Instead, belief relies on trust and<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_824\">faith<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Different individuals, cultures, and societies may place more value on one type of knowing than another, although most use a combination that includes science, empiricism, and religion. In fact, Bronis\u0142aw Malinowski (1884\u20131942), an important anthropologist of the early twentieth century, concluded that all societies use both religion <em>and<\/em> science in some way or another, because they are both common ways that humans experience the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In contemporary societies such as the United States, science and (some) religions conflict on the topic of human origins. Nearly every culture and society has a unique origin story that explains where they came from and how they came to be who they are today. These stories are often integrated into the culture\u2019s religious belief system. Many anthropologists are interested in faith-based origin stories and other beliefs because they show us how a particular group of people explain the world and their place in it. Anthropologists also value scientific understanding as the basis for how humans vary biologically and change over time. In other words, anthropologists value the multiple knowledge systems of different groups and use them to understand the human condition in a broad and inclusive way.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is also important to note that scientists often depend on the local knowledge of the people with whom they work to understand elements of the natural or physical world that science has not yet investigated. Many groups, including <strong>Indigenous<\/strong> peoples, know about the world through prolonged relationships with the environment. Indigenous knowledge systems\u2014specific to an Indigenous community or group\u2014are informed by their own empirical observation of a specific environment and passed down over generations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While religion and Indigenous knowledge systems may play a complementary role in helping anthropologists understand the human condition, they are distinct from science. The anthropological subdiscipline of biological anthropology is based on scientific ways of knowing about humans and human origins. In this volume, we will exclusively explore what science tells us about how humans came to be and why we are the way we are today. Therefore, you do not need to <em>believe<\/em> in evolution to master this material, because belief is not a scientific way of knowing. For this textbook, you only need to <em>understand <\/em>the scientific perspectives of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Throughout our lives, each of us work to reconcile our worldview with the different ways we have of knowing things. This is part of our lifelong intellectual journey. It is also, in our opinion, one of the most exciting parts of learning. We are pleased you have joined us on this journey of knowledge about humanity and yourself!<\/p>\n<h2>Summary<\/h2>\n<p>Biological anthropology relies on the scientific method to investigate humans and other primates across time and place. While research in this field begins with careful observation, hypotheses are more closely examined with empirical evidence from excavation, fieldwork, or laboratory study. Focusing on this scientific foundation, the discipline allows anthropologists to move beyond belief and speculation to produce knowledge that is testable and continually open to challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Findings are continually debated, reviewed, and revised, ensuring that explanations improve and remain grounded in current and relevant evidence. If you have not caught on already, this textbook follows the same process, reflecting the evolving body of knowledge that is biological anthropology.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is science?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is the scientific method?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">How does science compare to other ways of knowing?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Empirical<\/strong>: Evidence that is verifiable by observation or experience instead of relying primarily on logic or theory.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Faith<\/strong>: Complete trust or confidence in the doctrines of a religion, typically based on spiritual apprehension rather than empirical proof.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Knowledge system<\/strong>: A unified way of knowing that is shared by a group of people and used to explain and predict phenomena.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Participant observation<\/strong>: A research method common in cultural anthropology that involves living with, observing, and participating in the same activities as the people one studies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Scholarly peer review<\/strong>: The process whereby an author\u2019s work must pass the scrutiny of other experts in the field before being published in a journal or book.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Scientific u<\/strong><strong>nderstanding<\/strong>: Knowledge accumulated by systematic scientific study, supported by rigorous testing and organized by general principles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Theory<\/strong>: An explanation of observations that typically addresses a wide range of phenomena.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.understandingscience.org\">Understanding Science website<\/a> (a project of the University of California Museum of Paleontology.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #333333\">Anticole, Matt. n.d. <a href=\"https:\/\/ed.ted.com\/lessons\/what-s-the-difference-between-a-scientific-law-and-theory-matt-anticole#watch\">\u201cWhat\u2019s the Difference between a Scientific Law and Theory?\"<\/a> TedEd Lesson. \u00a0Accessed January 28, 2023.<\/span>\u00a028, 2023.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chan, Keith. 2021. \u201cIcebreaker Science.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\"><em>Explorations<\/em><em>:<\/em><em> Lab and Activities Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chizmeshya, Sydney Quinn, and Katherine E. Brent. 2021. \u201cKnowing and Believing.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\"><em>Explorations:<\/em> <em>Lab and Activities Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pfister, Anne E. 2021. \u201cScience and Belief: Just Because We Can, Doesn\u2019t Always Mean We Should.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activities Manual<\/em><\/a> edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Binford, Leigh. 2016. <em>The El Mozote Massacre: Human Rights and Global Implications.<\/em> Revised and expanded edition. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Estrada, Alejandro, Paul A. Garber, Anthony B. Rylands, Christian Roos, Eduardo Fernandez-Duque, Anthony Di Fiore, K. Anne-Isola Nekaris, et al. 2017. \u201cImpending Extinction Crisis of the World\u2019s Primates: Why Primates Matter.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 3(229): 1\u201316.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Farmer, Paul. 2006. <em>AIDS and Accusation: Haiti and the Geography of Blame.<\/em> Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Farmer, Paul, Matthew Basilico, Vanessa Kerry, Madeleine Ballard, Anne Becker, Gene Bukhman, Ophelia Dahl, et al. 2013. \u201cGlobal Health Priorities for the Early Twenty-first Century.\u201d In <em>Reimagining Global Health: An Introduction, <\/em>edited by Paul Farmer, Jim Yong Kim, Arthur Kleinman, and Matthew Basilico, 302\u2013339. Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Kenyon, Kathleen. 1979. <em>Archaeology in the Holy Land.<\/em> New York: W.W. Norton.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Malotki, Ekkehart. 1983. <em>Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Languag<\/em><em>e.<\/em> Berlin: De Gruyter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Mead, Margaret. 1928. <em>Coming of Age in Samoa<\/em>. Oxford: Morrow.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin. 2017. \u201cLanguage Socialization: An Historical Overview.\u201d In <em>Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Volume 8, <\/em>edited by Patricia Duff, 3-16. New York: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rathje, William and Cullen Murphy. 1992. \"Five Major Myths about Garbage, and Why They're Wrong.\" <em>Smithsonian<\/em> 23, no. 4: 113-122.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">TANN. 2018. <a href=\"https:\/\/archaeonewsnet.com\/2018\/08\/mexican-anthropologists-put-face-on.html\">\u201cMexican Anthropologists Put Face on Nearly 14,000-Year-Old Woman.\u201d<\/a> <em>Archaeology News Network<\/em>, August 19, 2018<em>. <\/em>Accessed on November 16, 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Whorf, Benjamin. 1956. <em>Language, Thought, and Reality.<\/em> Cambridge: MIT Press.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_936\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_936\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.791999816894531pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Joylin Namie, Ph.D., Truckee Meadows Community College<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li>Identify and describe the major developments in scientific thought that led to the discovery of evolutionary processes.<\/li>\n<li>Explain how natural selection works and results in evolutionary change over time.<\/li>\n<li>Explain what is meant by the \u201cModern Synthesis\u201d and its impacts on evolutionary thought.<\/li>\n<li>Discuss the teaching of human evolution in the U.S. and abroad.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">The Beginnings of Evolutionary Thinking<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.627006530761719pt;margin-right: 3.917236328125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Throughout our evolutionary history, humans have developed an understanding of the natural world as they interacted with and extracted resources from it. To survive, our earliest ancestors possessed an understanding of the physical environment, including weather patterns, animal behavior, edible and medicinal plants, locations of water, and seasonal cycles. Many ancient cultures, including those of the Americas (Dunbar-Ortiz 2014), Mesopotamia, and Egypt, left writings, hieroglyphics, and stories passed down through oral tradition detailing their understanding of the natural environment, human and zoological anatomy, botany, and medical practices (Moore 1993).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.209999084472656pt;margin-right: 11.6515502929688pt;text-indent: 0pt\">There are also over 2,000 years of organized thought and writing regarding <strong>evolution<\/strong>, including contributions from Greek, Roman, and Islamic scholars. Three examples of note are included here. The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384\u2013322 BCE) studied the natural world, publishing several volumes on animals based on systematic observations, rather than attributing what he observed to divine intervention, as his contemporaries were doing (Figure 2.1). Aristotle\u2019s system for the biological classification of nearly 500 species of animals was based on his own observations and dissections, interviews with specialists such as beekeepers and fishermen, and accounts of travelers. His nine book <em>History of Animals<\/em>, published in the 4th century BC (n.d.), was one of the first zoological taxonomies ever created. Aristotle\u2019s primary contribution to the classification of biological species was to recognize that natural groups are based on structure, physiology, mode of reproduction, and behavior (Moore 1993, 39).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 1.243003845214844pt;margin-right: 31.8323364257812pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/03\/image3-5.jpg\" alt=\"Large orange octopus on ocean floor.\" width=\"240\" height=\"321\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 338px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-4.jpg\" alt=\"Elephant half-submerged in a body of water with a ferry of human watchers behind.\" width=\"338\" height=\"231\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.1a-b: Aristotle was the first to publish that a. octopuses can change their colors when disturbed and b. elephants use their trunks as a snorkel when crossing deep water. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Octopus_macropus.jpg\">Octopus macropus<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/subnormali-team.blogspot.com\/2006_12_01_archive.html\">SUBnormali Team<\/a> (originally from <a href=\"https:\/\/it.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Utente:Yoruno\">Yoruno<\/a>) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/#:~:text=You%20are%20free%20to%3A,for%20any%20purpose%2C%20even%20commercially.\">CC-BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Elephant_swimming,_Botswana_(cropped).jpg\">Elephant swimming, Botswana (cropped)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/8721758@N06\">Jorge L\u00e1scar<\/a> from Australia (uploaded by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/29050464@N06\/\">Peter D. Tillman<\/a>) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 263px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-3.png\" alt=\"Rows of organisms, with plants and animals at the bottom and humans, angels, and God at top.\" width=\"263\" height=\"379\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.2: The Great Chain of Being by Didacus Valades. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=1688250\">Great Chain of Being<\/a> by Didacus Valades (Diego Valades 1579) and photographed by Rhetorica Christiana (via <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/rhetoricachristi00vala\/page\/n259\/mode\/2up\">Getty Research<\/a>) is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 11.6515502929688pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Aristotle\u2019s <em>History of Animals<\/em> also placed animals in a hierarchy, ranking animals above plants due to what he claimed were their abilities to sense the world around them and to move. He also graded animals according to their modes of reproduction. Those giving birth to live young were placed above those who laid eggs. Warm-blooded animals ranked above invertebrates. This concept of \u201chigher\u201d and \u201clower\u201d organisms was expanded upon by scholars in the Medieval period to form the <em>Scala Naturae<\/em> (Latin for \u201cladder of being\u201d). This \u201cGreat Chain of Being,\u201d depicting a hierarchy of beings with God at the top and minerals at the bottom (Figure 2.2), was thought by medieval Christians to have been decreed by God; in this Great Chain, humans were placed closer to God than other species. Aristotle\u2019s works were rediscovered by Islamic scholars in the ninth century and translated into Arabic, Syriac, Persian, and later into Latin, becoming part of university curriculum in 13th-century Europe (Lindberg 1992), allowing Aristotle\u2019s works and ideas to influence other thinkers for 2,000 years.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 251px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-5.jpg\" alt=\"A person leading a giraffe on a leash, with text written in Arabic below.\" width=\"251\" height=\"375\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.3: An image from Kit\u0101b al-\u1e25ayaw\u0101n (Book of the Animals) by Al-Jahiz. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Al-Jahiz.jpg\">Al-Jahiz<\/a> by Al-Jahiz [in <a href=\"https:\/\/themuslimtimes.info\/2017\/02\/25\/al-jahizs-book-of-animals-the-transcendent-value-of-disgust\/\">Kit\u0101b al-\u1e25ayaw\u0101n<\/a> (Book of the Animals), 15th century] is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 12.08837890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Science also owes a debt to many Arabic scholars. One such Islamic scholar and writer, who built upon the ideas of Aristotle, was Ab\u016b \u02bfUthman \u02bfAmr ibn Ba\u1e25r al-Kin\u0101n\u012b al-Ba\u1e63r\u012b \/ al-J\u0101\u1e25i\u1e93, known as Al-Jahiz (776\u2013868 CE), who authored over 200 books (El-Zaher 2018; Figure 2.3). His most well-known work was the seven-volume <em>Kitab al-Hayawan<\/em> or <em>Book of Animals<\/em>, in which he described over 350 species in zoological detail. Importantly, Al-Jahiz introduced the idea and mechanisms of biological evolution 1,000 years before Darwin proposed the concept of <strong>natural selection<\/strong> in 1859 (Love 2020). For instance, Al-Jahiz wrote about the struggle for existence, the transformation of species over time, and environmental factors that influence the process, all ideas that were later espoused by western European scientists in the 19th century. Al-Jahiz wrote:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.891006pt;margin-right: 12.0884pt;text-indent: 0.648994pt;text-align: left;padding-left: 40px\">Animals engage in a struggle for existing, and for resources, to avoid being eaten, and to breed. Environmental factors influence organisms to develop new characteristics to ensure survival, thus transforming them into new species. Animals that survive to breed can pass on their successful characteristics to their offspring. [Masood 2009]<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 335px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-7.png\" alt=\"A person with a full beard and turban looks into the distance.\" width=\"335\" height=\"389\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.4: Drawing of Ibn al-Haytham. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ibn_al-Haytham.png\">Ibn al-Haytham<\/a> by Sopianwar is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.891006469726562pt;margin-right: 12.08837890625pt;text-indent: 0.648994445800781pt\">Another important early Islamic scientist is Ibn al-Haytham (965\u20131040), a 10th-century Islamic scholar who contributed a great deal to our understanding of optics and how human vision works (Figure 2.4; Lindberg 1992, 177\u2013180). Born in what is now Iraq, al-Haytham was a scholar of many disciplines, including mathematics, physics, mechanics, astronomy, philosophy, and medicine. He authored some 200 books in his lifetime and was an expert on Aristotle\u2019s natural philosophy, logic, and metaphysics. In relation to evolution, al-Haytham\u2019s methodology of investigation\u2014specifically, using experiments to verify theory\u2014is similar to what later became known as the modern scientific method. He is most famous for discovering the laws of reflection and refraction over 1,000 years ago and inventing the camera obscura, which was incredibly important for the eventual development of photography. His work is credited for its influence on astronomy, mathematics, and optics, inspiring Galileo, Johannes Kepler, and Sir Isaac Newton (Tasci 2020). As an inspirational scientific figure, al-Haytham was celebrated in 2016 by UNESCO as a trailblazer and the founder of modern optics (Figure 2.5). An International Year of Light was named in his honor and a scholarly conference on his contributions was held to coincide with the 1,000th anniversary of the publication of his <em>Kit\u0101b al-Man\u0101\u1e93ir<\/em> (Book of Optics; UNESCO.org 2015).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 239px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-2.jpg\" alt=\"Labeled diagram of the eye and optic nerves.\" width=\"239\" height=\"399\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.5: Diagram of the Human Eye by Ibn al-Haytham. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:I.A._Haitham,_Diagram_of_the_eye,_16th_century_Wellcome_L0011969.jpg\">Diagram of the eye<\/a> by Ibn Al [Alhazen] Haitham (16th Century) has been modified (cropped) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>. This image is available from <a href=\"https:\/\/wellcomeimages.org\/\">Wellcome Images<\/a> 3044 (under the photo number L0011969).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.891006469726562pt;margin-right: 12.08837890625pt;text-indent: 0.648994445800781pt\">The writings of these Islamic scholars as well as similar scientific texts from other cultures were unknown to or unacknowledged by Western scientists until recently. Fortunately, many science teachers are now incorporating this content into their classes (Love 2020).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.364006042480469pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Western European Evolutionary Thought<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 0.0257568359375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Although there have been many different scientific traditions throughout world history, a new global discourse around science emerged in Western Europe in the 19th century. Europeans pointed to the continuing expansion of their colonial power\u2014as well as their military and technological success\u2014as evidence of the efficacy of Western science, which came to dominate on a global scale (Elshakry 2010). The movement toward a global science centered in Western Europe began with formulation of the <strong>Scientific Method<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0.0257568359375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The Scientific Method was first codified by Francis Bacon (1561\u20131626), an English politician who was likely influenced by the methods of inquiry established by Ibn al-Haytham centuries prior (Tbakhi &amp; Amr 2007). Bacon has been called the founder of <strong>empiricism<\/strong> for proposing a system for weighing the truthfulness of knowledge based solely on inductive reasoning and careful observations of natural phenomena. Ironically, he died as a result of trying to scientifically observe the effects of cold on the putrefaction of meat. On a journey out of London, he purchased a chicken and stuffed it with snow for observation, catching a chill in the process. One week later, he died of bronchitis (Urbach, Quinton, &amp; Lea 2023).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0.0257568359375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The second important development with regard to evolution was the concept of a <strong>species<\/strong>. John Ray (1627\u20131705), an English parson and naturalist, was the first person to publish a biological definition of species in his <em>Historia Plantarum<\/em> (<em>History of Plants),<\/em> a three volume work published in 1686, 1688, and 1704<em>. <\/em>Ray defined a <em>species<\/em> as a group of morphologically similar organisms arising from a common ancestor. However, we now define a species as a group of similar organisms capable of producing fertile offspring. In keeping with the scientific method, Ray classified plants according to similarities and differences that emerged from observation. He claimed that any seed from the same plant was the same species, even if it had slightly different traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 4.403076171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The modern period of biological classification began with the work of Carl von Linne (\u201cCarolus Linnaeus\u201d) (1707\u20131778), a Swedish scientist who laid the foundations for the modern scheme of taxonomy used today. He established the system of <strong>binomial nomenclature<\/strong>, in which a species of animal or plant receives a name consisting of two terms: the first term identifies the genus to which it belongs and the second term identifies the species. His original <em>Systema<\/em> <em>Naturae<\/em>, published in 1736, went through several editions. By the tenth edition in 1758, mammals incorporated primates, including apes and humans, and the term <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>was introduced to signify the latter (Paterlini 2007).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.495002746582031pt;margin-right: 4.97509765625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon (1707\u20131788), was a prominent French naturalist whose work influenced prominent scientists in the second half of the 18th century. Buffon's idea that species change over time became a cornerstone of modern evolutionary theory. His technique of comparing similar structures across different species, called <strong>comparative anatomy<\/strong>, is still in use today in the study of evolution. He published 36 volumes of <em>Histoire<\/em> <em>Naturelle<\/em> during his lifetime and heavily influenced two prominent French thinkers who were to have significant impacts on our understanding of evolution, Georges Cuvier and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 455px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-2.jpg\" alt=\"Historic painting of person with short wavy hair next to drawing of a mastodon skeleton.\" width=\"455\" height=\"302\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.6: Cuvier with one of his drawings of a fossil quadruped. Credit: Cuvier and a fossil quadruped original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Georges_Cuvier_3.jpg\">Georges Cuvier 3<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fran%C3%A7ois-Andr%C3%A9_Vincent\">Fran\u00e7ois-Andr\u00e9 Vincent<\/a> (artist), <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/freesvg.org\/mammoth-skeleton\">Mammoth skeleton<\/a> in <a href=\"https:\/\/freesvg.org\/by\/OpenClipart\">OpenClipart<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.594001770019531pt;margin-right: 1.4913330078125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Georges Cuvier (1769\u20131832) was a paleontologist and comparative anatomist (Figure 2.6). One of his first major contributions to the field of evolution was proof that some species had become <strong>extinct <\/strong>through detailed and comprehensive analyses of large fossil quadrupeds (Moore 1993, 111). The idea of extinction was not new, but it was challenging to demonstrate if a fossil species was truly extinct or still had living relatives elsewhere. It was also challenging in that it ran counter to religious beliefs of the time. The Bible\u2019s Book of Genesis was interpreted as saying that all species had been created by God in the seven days it took to create the world and that all created species have survived to this day. Extinction was interpreted as implying imperfection, suggesting God\u2019s work was flawed. Also, given that the Earth was calculated to have been created in 4004 B.C.E., based on biblical genealogies, there would not have been enough time for species to disappear (Moore 1993, 112).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 1.4913330078125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cuvier was so knowledgeable in this field that he became famous for his ability to reconstruct what an extinct animal looked like from fragmentary remains. He demonstrated that fossil mammoths differed from similar living creatures, such as elephants. His many examples of fossils telling the stories of animals that lived and then disappeared were taken as incontrovertible proof of extinctions (PBS 2001). Where Cuvier went awry was his hypothesis of how extinction worked and its causes. As part of his study of comparative anatomy, Cuvier made observations of stratified layers of rock, or sediment, each containing different species. From this, he drew conclusions that species were \u201cfixed\u201d and did not evolve, but then went extinct, and that different assemblages of fossils occurred at different times in the past, as evidenced by the sedimentary layers (Moore 1993, 118). Cuvier explained this through a theory of <strong>catastrophism<\/strong>, which stated that successive catastrophic deluges (akin to Biblical floods) swept over parts of the Earth periodically, exterminating all life. When the waters receded from a particular region, lifeforms from unaffected regions would repopulate the areas that were destroyed, giving rise to a new layer of species that looked different from the layer below it. This theory implied that species were fixed in place and did not evolve and that the Earth was young. In fact, Cuvier postulated that the last catastrophe was a deluge he believed occurred five to six thousand years ago, paving the way for the advent of humans (Moore 1993, 118). Cuvier\u2019s catastrophism became part of an ongoing and vociferous debate between two schools of geology. The catastrophists believed the present state of the earth was the consequence of a series of violent catastrophes of short duration, while the uniformitarians thought it was the result of slow acting geological forces that continue to shape the earth.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 379px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-2.jpg\" alt=\"Horizontal layers of rock rest on vertical layers of rock.\" width=\"379\" height=\"303\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.7: Siccar Point, Aberdeen, UK. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Siccar_Point.jpg\">Siccar Point<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.geograph.org.uk\/profile\/139\">Anne Burgess<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.495002746582031pt;margin-right: 1.47552490234375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">James Hutton (1726\u20131797) was one prominent proponent of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_830\">uniformitarianism<\/a><\/strong>. Based on evidence he found at sites in his native Scotland, Hutton argued that the Earth was much older than previously thought. Examining the geology of Siccar Point, a cliff site on the eastern coast of Scotland (Figure 2.7), Hutton concluded that the intersection of the vertical and horizontal rocks represented a gap in time of many millions of years, during which the lower rocks had been deformed and eroded before the upper layers were deposited on top. From this, Hutton argued sediments are deposited primarily in the oceans, where they become strata, or layers of sedimentary rock. Volcanic action uplifts these strata to form mountains, which are then subject to erosion from rain, rivers, and wind, returning sediment to the oceans (Moore 1993, 121). Hutton\u2019s <em>Theory of the Earth <\/em>(1788) demanded vast periods of time (known as \u201cdeep time\u201d) for such slow-working forces to shape the earth. At the time, he was heavily criticized for this view, as it contradicted the biblical version of the history of creation.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 391px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-3.jpg\" alt=\"A cross-section of a volcanic eruption showing different types of rock that make up the volcano.\" width=\"391\" height=\"249\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.8: The frontispiece from Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology (2nd American edition, 1857), showing the origins of different rock types. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lyell_Principles_frontispiece.jpg\">Lyell Principles frontispiece<\/a> by Charles Lyell (Principles of Geology, 2nd American edition, 1857) is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.495002746582031pt;margin-right: 1.47552490234375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another Scotsman, who was to become a highly influential geologist and a close friend of Darwin, was Charles Lyell (1797\u20131875). Lyell was originally a lawyer who began his studies of Geology at Oxford under the tutelage of catastrophist William Buckland, from whom he diverged when Buckland tried to find physical evidence of Noah\u2019s flood from the Christian Bible. Lyell was instead intent on establishing geology as a science based on observation. Building upon Hutton\u2019s ideas (published 50 years earlier), Lyell traveled throughout Europe, documenting evidence of uniformitarianism. During his travels, he cataloged evidence of sea level rise and fall and of volcanoes positioned atop much older rocks. He also found evidence of valleys formed through erosion, mountains resulting from earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions that had been witnessed or documented in the past (University of California Berkeley Museum of Paleontology n.d.). Lyell also espoused the principle that \u201crocks and strata (layers of rock) increase in age the further down they are in a geological sequence. Barring obvious upheavals or other evidence of disturbance, the same principle must apply to any fossils contained within the rock. The lower down in a sequence of rocks a fossil is, the older it is likely to be (Wood 2005, 12).\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.495002746582031pt;margin-right: 1.47552490234375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lyell published the first edition of his three-volume <em>Principles of Geology <\/em>in 1830\u20131833 (Figure 2.8). It established geology as a science, underwent constant revisions as new scientific evidence was discovered, and was published in 12 editions during Lyell\u2019s lifetime. In it, he espoused the key concept of uniformitarianism\u2014that \"the present is the key to the past.\u201d What this meant was that geological remains from the distant past can be explained by reference to geological processes now in operation and directly observable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 1.83465576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744\u20131829) was the first Western scientist to propose a mechanism explaining why and how traits changed in species over time, as well as to recognize the importance of the physical environment in acting on and shaping physical characteristics. Lamarck\u2019s view of how and why species changed through time, known as the \u201cTheory of Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics,\u201d was first presented in the introductory lecture to students in his invertebrate zoology class at the Museum of Natural History in Paris in 1802 (Burkhardt 2013). It was based on the idea that as animals adapted to their environments through the use and disuse of characteristics, their adaptations were passed on to their offspring through reproduction (Figure 2.9). Lamarck was right about the environment having an influence on characteristics of species, as well as about variations being passed on through reproduction. He simply had the mechanism wrong.<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14-5.png\" alt=\"Giraffes with necks of different heights reach to eat leaves.\" width=\"419\" height=\"244\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 404px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-7.png\" alt=\"Illustration of three giraffes with necks of different heights.\" width=\"404\" height=\"391\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.9a-b: Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics and Natural Selection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Lamarckian Evolution (Figure 4.2A and 4.2B)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 1.86676025390625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lamarck\u2019s theory involved a three-step process. Step one involves an animal experiencing a radical change in its environment. Step two is the animal (either individual or species) responding with a new kind of behavior. Step three is how the behavioral change results in morphological (meaning physical) changes to the animal that are successfully passed on to subsequent generations (Ward 2018, 8). Lamarck\u2019s most famous example was the proposition that giraffes actively stretched their necks to reach leaves on tall trees to eat. Over their lifetimes, the continuation of this habit resulted in gradual lengthening of the neck. These longer necks were then passed on to their offspring. Lamarck's theory was disproved when evolutionary biologist August Weismann published the results of an experiment involving mice (Figure 2.10). Weismann amputated the tails of 68 mice and then successively bred five generations of them, removing the tails of all offspring in each generation, eventually producing 901 mice, all of whom had perfectly healthy long tails in spite of having parents whose tails were missing (Weismann 1889).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 551px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-5.png\" alt=\"Mice with cut-off ails breed healthy offspring with full length tails.\" width=\"551\" height=\"385\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.10: Weismann\u2019s mouse-tail experiment showing that offspring do not inherit traits that the parents acquired during their lifetimes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-3\/\">Weismann\u2019s mouse-tail experiment (Figure 4.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 0.20892333984375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">How giraffes actually ended up with long necks is a different story. In an environment where the food supply is higher off the ground, and perhaps less available to competing species, giraffes who happened to have slightly longer necks (due to random individual variation and genetic mutation) would be more likely to survive. These giraffes would then be able to reproduce, passing along the slight variation in neck length that would allow their offspring to do the same. Over time, individuals with longer necks would be overrepresented in the population, and neck lengths overall would increase among giraffes. Unfortunately, Lamarck\u2019s ideas challenged the scientific establishment of the time and were rejected. He was discredited and harassed \u201cto the point of loss of money, reputation, and then health\u201d (Ward 2018, 9).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 0.4715576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The final piece in the evolutionary puzzle leading up to the theory of natural selection was put forth by Thomas Malthus (1766\u20131834), who published <em>A<\/em><em>n Essay on Population <\/em>in 1798. Malthus lived in England during the time of the Industrial Revolution. It was a time of great poverty and misery when many people migrated from the countryside to squalid, disease-ridden cities to work extremely long hours in dangerous conditions in factories, coal mines, and other industrial workplaces. Birth rates were high and starvation and disease were rampant. Malthus struggled to explain why. His answer was basically the idea of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1788\">carrying capacity<\/a><\/strong>, an ecological concept still in use today. Malthus suggested the rate of population growth exceeded the rate of increase of the human food supply. In other words, people were outgrowing the available food crops. He also suggested that populations of animals and plants were naturally constrained by the food supply, resulting in reductions in population in times of scarcity, \u201crestraining them within the prescribed bounds\u201d (Moore 1993, 147). But, despite significant challenges, some individuals always survived. This was the key to later understandings of evolutionary change in species over time.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.331001281738281pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The Journey to Natural Selection<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 7.171630859375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In Western European thought, the individual most closely associated with evolution is Charles Darwin (1809\u20131882). However, as one can see from the individuals and ideas presented in the prior section, he was not the first person to explore evolution and how it might work. In fact, Darwin built upon and synthesized many of the ideas\u2014from geology to biology, ecology, and economy\u2014discussed above. He was simply in the right place at the right time. If he had not worked out his ideas when he did, someone else would have. As a matter of fact, as noted below, someone else did, forcing Darwin to publicly reveal his theory.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 7.171630859375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin continued his observations and experiments during his formal education, culminating in his graduation from Cambridge in 1831, at which point he was invited to become a gentleman naturalist for a British Royal Navy surveying mission of the globe aboard the H.M.S. <em>Beagle<\/em>. It is worth noting that Darwin was only 22 years old and the captain\u2019s third choice for the position (Costa 2017), but he proved extremely curious and methodical. The mission departed in December of 1831 and returned five years later (Figure 2.11). During this time, Darwin produced copious notebooks, observations, drawings, and reflections on the natural phenomena he encountered and the experiments he performed.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 780px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22-5.png\" alt=\"The voyage of the Beagle throughout the world.\" width=\"780\" height=\"329\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.11: Map of the voyage of the H.M.S. Beagle. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Voyage_of_the_Beagle-de.svg\">Voyage of the Beagle-de<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Succu\">Succu<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 3.4952392578125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Discussing all of Darwin\u2019s work aboard the <em>Beagle <\/em>is beyond the scope of this chapter, but his primary interests were in cataloging new varieties of plant and animal life and examining the geology of the places the ship made landfall. Part of Darwin\u2019s success with regard to both ventures was due to his extreme seasickness, which began before the ship even left Plymouth Harbor. It never let up, encouraging Darwin to go ashore at every available opportunity. \u201cIn fact, of the nearly five years of the voyage, Darwin was actually on board the ship for just a year and a half altogether\u201d (Costa 2017, 18).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 4.93707275390625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">During the voyage, the young Darwin tried to make sense of what he saw through the lens of the scientific paradigms he held when he left England, but he continually made observations that challenged these paradigms. For example, while the <em>Beagle<\/em> crewmen were charting the coast of Argentina, Darwin conducted fieldwork on land. There he observed species that were new to him, like armadillos. He also collected fossils, including those of extinct armadillos. Meaning, he had found both <strong>extant <\/strong>and extinct members of the same species in the same geographic location, which challenged the theory of catastrophism put forth by Cuvier, who argued that each variant of an animal, living or extinct, was its own distinct species (Moore 1993, 144). Darwin also observed geographic variation in the same species all along the east coast of South America, from Brazil to the southern tip of Argentina. He noted that some species were found in multiple localities and differed from place to place. Those living closer to each other exhibited only slight variations, while those living further apart might be cataloged as entirely different species if one did not know better.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 14.136962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">He made similar observations in the Galapagos Islands located off the northwest coast of Ecuador, with regard to giant tortoises and finches (Figure 2.12). A local resident of the islands explained to Darwin that each island had its own variety of tortoise and that locals could discern which island a tortoise came from simply by looking at it. Darwin noted other such examples in both plants and animals, meaning geographic variation was occurring on separate, neighboring islands.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 684px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-4.jpg\" alt=\"Hood Island tortoises have saddle-backed shells; Isabella Island, dome-shaped; Pinta Island, intermediate.\" width=\"684\" height=\"528\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.12: Variation in giant tortoises in the Galapagos Islands. Credit: Giant Tortoises of the Galapagos Islands original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Mary Nelson and Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0.67529296875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Prevailing views of time argued that variations in living species, and even the fossil armadillos and the living armadillos, were the result of separate creation events. According to this view, each variation, no matter how slight, was a different species. Challenging these ideas would mean challenging not only catastrophism, but the <strong>Fixity of Species<\/strong> and other well-accepted ideas of the time. Darwin was aware that he was a young, unestablished naturalist. He was also aware of the ruin that befell Lamarck when his theories were rejected. Lastly, Lyell, who was a good friend of Darwin\u2019s, rejected evolution altogether. It is no wonder that Darwin published a great deal about the geological and fossil data he collected when he returned from the voyage, but not his early hypotheses about evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.627006530761719pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Upon Darwin\u2019s return to England, it took another twenty years of data collection and experimentation before he was ready to share his conclusions about evolution. Much of this work was conducted at Down House, his home of forty years, where he performed all sorts of experiments that laid the groundwork for his ideas about evolution. Darwin\u2019s home was his laboratory, and he engaged the help of his children, neighbors, friends, and servants in collecting, dissecting, and experimenting. At one point in the 1850s, sheets of moistened paper covered with frogs eggs lined the hallways of the house, while flocks of sixteen different pigeon breeds cooed outside, glass jars filled with salt water and floating seeds filled the cellar, and the smell of dissected pigeon skeletons pervaded the air inside the house. There were also ongoing experiments in the yard, including piles of dissected flowers, beekeeping, and fenced-off plots of land where seedlings were under study. Darwin was a keen experimental scientist, observer, and a prolific writer and presenter of scientific papers. He regarded his work as \u201cone long argument\u201d that never really ended. In fact, Darwin published ten books after <em>On the Origin of Species<\/em>, addressing such far-ranging topics as animal behavior, orchids, and domestication, among others (Costa 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.627006530761719pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin may not have published <em>Origins<\/em> in 1859 had it not been for receiving a paper in June of 1858 from Alfred Russel Wallace, an English naturalist working in Malaysia, espousing the same ideas. Wallace had sent the paper to Darwin asking if it was worthy of publication and requesting he forward it to Lyell and the English botanist, Joseph Hooker. Darwin wrote to Lyell and Hooker about Wallace\u2019s paper, entitled <em>On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type<\/em>. In recognition that both Wallace and Darwin had arrived at the same discovery, a \u201cjoint\u201d paper composed of four parts (none of them actually coauthored) was read to the Linnaean Society by Lyell, then secretary of the Society, on July 1, 1858, and published on August 20. Darwin published <em>On the Origin of Species <\/em>15 months later. (The original composite paper read before the Linnaean society is available to read for free from the Alfred Russell Wallace Website, on the <a href=\"https:\/\/wallacefund.myspecies.info\/content\/1858-darwin-wallace-paper\">1858 Darwin-Wallace paper<\/a> page.)<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.726005554199219pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>The Mechanism of Natural Selection <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 4.15203857421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Let us take a moment here to explore the mechanism of natural selection in more detail. Before we begin, it is important to recognize that Darwin defined evolution as descent with modification, by which he meant that species share a common ancestor yet change over time, giving rise to new species. Descent with modification refers to the fact that offspring from two parents look different from each of their parents, and from each other, meaning they descend with slight differences (\u201cmodifications\u201d). If you have ever observed a litter of puppies or a field of flowers and stopped to examine each individual closely, you have seen that each differs from the next, and none look exactly like their parents. These variations are random, not specific, and may or may not be present in the following generations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 4.15203857421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin struggled to explain why some slight differences were preserved over time, while others were not. He turned to what he knew of animal breeding (<strong>artificial selection<\/strong>) for an explanation (Richards 1998). Darwin bred different breeds of pigeons at Down House, carefully documenting phenotypic differences across generations, including slight anatomical variations he observed through dissection. He also grew and crossbred species of flowers and dissected those too. Darwin was also very fond of hunting and of hunting dogs. In an early draft of his theory on speciation, he used greyhounds as an example of adaptation and selection, \u201cnoting how its every bone and muscle, instinct and habit, were fitted to run down hare (rabbits) (University of Cambridge n.d.).\u201d In each case of plant and animal breeding Darwin observed, he noted that humans were selecting variants in each generation that had characteristics humans desired (i.e., sweetness of fruits, colors of flowers, fur type and color of animals). Breeders then continually bred plants and animals with the desired variants, over and over again. These small changes added up over time to create new species of plants and breeds of animals. Darwin also noted that artificial selection does not necessarily render plants or animals better adapted to their original environments. The characteristics humans desire often result in plants less likely to survive in the wild and animals more likely to suffer from certain behavioural or health problems. One has only to examine high rates of hip dysplasia in several modern breeds of dogs to observe what Darwin was referring to.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 4.15203857421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">From his studies of artificial selection, Darwin drew the conclusion that nature also acts upon variations among members of the same species. Instead of human intervention, the forces of nature, such as heat, cold, predation, disease, and now climate change, determine which offspring, with which variants, survive and reproduce. These individuals then pass down these favorable variants to their own offspring. In this way, nature selects for traits that are beneficial within a particular environment and selects against traits that are disadvantageous within a particular environment. Over many generations, populations of a species become more and more adapted (or, in evolutionary terms, \u201cfit\u201d) for their specific environments. Darwin named this process natural selection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 4.15203857421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">This theory explained the variations in tortoises Darwin had observed years earlier in the Galapagos Islands (see Figure 2.12). Tortoises who lived on larger islands with lush vegetation to feed on were larger than those on smaller islands. They also had shorter necks and dome-shaped shells as their food was close to the ground. Tortoises on smaller, drier islands fed on cacti, which grew much taller. These tortoises had longer necks, longer front legs, and saddle-shaped shells, which allowed them to successfully stretch to reach the edible cactus pads that grew on the tops of the plants. How did these observable differences in the two tortoise populations emerge? Darwin would argue that, over time, small, random variations in the tortoises were differentially selected for by the distinct natural environments on different islands.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 4.15203857421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In addition to the biogeographical evidence Darwin offered from his research aboard the <em>Beagle<\/em>, as well as the evidence he documented from the artificial selection of plants and animals, he also relied, where possible, on fossil evidence. One example, mentioned above, were the fossil findings of extinct armadillos in Argentina in the same locations as living armadillos. Unfortunately, as Darwin himself noted, the geological record was incomplete, most often missing the transitional fossil forms that bridge extinct and living species. That issue has since been resolved with scientific research in geochronology and paleontology, among other fields. It is now well-established that life is far more ancient than was believed in Darwin\u2019s time and that these ancient forms of life were the ancestors to all life on this planet (Kutschera &amp; Niklas 2004).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What Darwin was Missing<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 2.886962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Although the theory of evolution by natural selection gained traction in scientific circles in the decades after Darwin\u2019s publication of <em>Origins<\/em>, he was never able to discover the mechanisms that caused variation within members of the same species or the means by which traits were inherited. This began later in 1892 with the publication of <em>The Germ-Plasm: A Theory of Heredity<\/em> by August Weismann, the same Weismann of the mouse tail experiment presented earlier in this chapter. In his book, Weissman proposed a theory of germ-plasm, which was a precursor to the later discovery and understanding of DNA. Weismann specialized in cytology, a branch of biology devoted to understanding the function of plant and animal cells. Germ-plasm, he proposed, was a substance in the germ cells (what we would call gametes, or sex cells, today) that carried hereditary information. He predicted that an offspring inherits half of its germ-plasm from each of its parents, and claimed that other cells (e.g. somatic, or body, cells) could not transmit genetic information from parents to offspring. This thereby erased the possibility that acquired traits (which he argued resided in somatic cells) could be inherited (Zou 2015). This contribution to evolutionary theory was an important step toward understanding genetic inheritance, but a connection between genetics and evolution was still lacking.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.886962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A series of lectures by a deceased Augustinian monk named Gregor Mendel (1822\u20131884), originally published in 1865, changed that perspective (Moore 1993, 285). Although Darwin was unknown to Mendel, he began a series of experiments with pea plants shortly after the publication of Darwin\u2019s <em>Origins<\/em>, aiming to add to evolutionary understandings of heredity. As Mendel bred different generations of pea plants that had differences in seed shape and color, pod shape and color, flower position, and stem length, he documented consistent expression of some variations over others in subsequent generations. He meticulously documented the statistics of each crossing of plants and the percentages of <strong>phenotypes<\/strong> that resulted, eventually discovering the concept of dominance and recessiveness of characteristics, as will be seen in chapter 3. The recognition of the importance of Mendel\u2019s work began with its rediscovery by Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns, both of whom were working on hypotheses regarding heredity in plants and had arrived at conclusions similar to Mendel\u2019s. Both published papers supporting Mendel\u2019s conclusions in 1900 (Moore 1993). Research into the inheritance of characteristics continued through the next three decades, and by the close of the 1930s, no major scientific questions remained regarding the transmission of heredity through <strong>genes<\/strong>, although what genes did and what chemicals they were made of were still under investigation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.886962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The <strong>Modern Synthesis <\/strong>refers to the merging of Mendelian genetics with Darwinian evolution that took place between 1930 and 1950. The basic principles of the synthetic theory were influenced by scientists working in many different fields, including genetics, zoology, biology, paleontology, botany, and statistics. Although there were differences of opinion among them, evolution came to be defined as changes in allele frequencies within populations. Genetic mutations, changes in the genetic code that are the original source of variation in every living thing, were believed to be random, the sources of phenotypic variation, and transmitted through sexual reproduction. These assertions were supported by a growing body of field and laboratory research, as well as new work in mathematics in the field of population genetics that defined evolution as numerical changes in gene frequencies within an interbreeding population from one generation to the next (Corning 2020). These changes in gene frequencies were argued to be the result of natural selection, mutation, migration (<strong>gene flow<\/strong>), and <strong>genetic drift<\/strong>, or random chance. Empirical research and mathematics demonstrated that very small selective forces acting over a relatively long time were able to generate substantial evolutionary change, including speciation (Plutynski 2009). Thus, the Modern Synthesis encompassed both <strong>microevolution<\/strong>, which refers to changes in gene frequencies between generations within a population, and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1507\">macroevolution<\/a><\/strong>, longer-term changes in a population that can eventually result in speciation, wherein individuals from different populations are no longer able to successfully interbreed and produce viable offspring.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 267px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-2.jpg\" alt=\"A white man with short hair dressed in a white shirt and dark tie.\" width=\"267\" height=\"355\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>Figure 2.13: Theodosius Dobzhansky (1943). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Dobzhansky_no_Brasil_em_1943.jpg\">Dobzhansky no Brasil em 1943<\/a> by unknown creator via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/celycarmo\/\">Cely Carmo<\/a> at Flickr is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><em>Genetics and the Origin of Species<\/em>, published in 1937 by Theodosius Dobzhansky (Figure 2.13), was a cornerstone of the modern synthesis, applying genetics to the study of natural selection in wild populations, appealing to both geneticists and field biologists. Dobzhansky was interested in <strong>speciation<\/strong>, particularly in finding out what kept one species distinct from another and how speciation occurred. His research involved fruit flies, the species <em>Drosophila pseudoobscura<\/em>. At the time he began in the 1920s, biologists assumed all members of the same species had nearly identical genes. Dobzhansky traveled from Canada to Mexico capturing wild members of <em>D.<\/em><em>pseudoobscura<\/em>, discovering that different populations had different combinations of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_738\">alleles<\/a><\/strong> (forms of a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1458\">gene<\/a><\/strong>) that distinguished them from other populations, even though they were all members of the same species. What, then, led to the creation of new species? Dobzhansky realized it was sexual selection. Members of the same species are more likely to live among their own kind and to recognize, and prefer, them as mates. Over time, as a result of random mutations, natural selection in a given environment, and <strong>genetic drift<\/strong>, meaning random changes in allele frequencies, members of the same population accumulate mutations distinct to their own <strong>gene pool<\/strong>, eventually becoming genetically distinct from other populations. What this means is that they have become a new <strong>species.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.527999877929688pt;margin-right: 2.886962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">From these studies, Dobzhansky and others developed the Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller model, also known as Dobzhansky-Muller model (Figure 2.14). It is a model of the evolution of genetic incompatibility. Combining genetics with natural selection, the model is important in understanding the role of reproductive isolation during speciation and the role of natural selection in bringing it about. Due to sexual selection (mate preference), populations can become reproductively isolated from one another. Eventually, novel mutations may arise and be selected for in one or both populations, rendering members of each genetically incompatible with the other, resulting in two distinct species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 601px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-4.jpg\" alt=\"Dobzhansky-Muller Model producing hybrids with incompatible mutations. See caption for image details.\" width=\"601\" height=\"348\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.14: The Dobzhansky-Muller Model: In the ancestral population the genotype is AABB. When two populations become isolated from each other, new mutations can arise. In one population uppercase A evolves into lowercase a, and in the other uppercase B evolves into lowercase b. When the two populations hybridize, it is the first time a and b interact with each other. When these alleles are incompatible, they represent Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller_model._.jpg\">Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller model<\/a> by OrientationEB is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Special Topic: Evolution and Natural Selection Observable Today<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 339px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-3.jpg\" alt=\"Side view of a brown speckled lizard laying on a plastic lawn chair.\" width=\"339\" height=\"226\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.15: Puerto Rican Crested Anole photographed in Picard, Dominica. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Anolis_cristatellus_in_Picard,_Dominica-2012_02_15_0339.jpg\">Anolis cristatellus in Picard, Dominica-2012 02 15 0339<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Postdlf\">Postdif<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Although this chapter primarily focuses on the past, it is important to remember that natural selection and evolution are still ongoing processes. Climate change, deforestation, urbanization, and other human impacts on the planet are influencing evolution among many contemporary species of plants and animals. One such example occurs among crested anoles (<em>Anolis cristatellus<\/em>), small lizards of the Caribbean jungle that are increasingly making their home in cities (Figure 2.15).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As urban sprawl continues across the planet, shrinking the availability of wilderness habitat, many wild species have come to make their homes in cities. \u201cUrbanization has dramatically transformed landscapes around the world\u2014changing how animals interact with nature, creating \"heat islands\" with higher temperatures, and hurting local biodiversity. Yet many organisms survive and even thrive in these urban environments, taking advantage of new habitats created by humans (National Science Foundation 2023). A recent example of lizards in Puerto Rico demonstrates evolution happening quickly in both behavior and genes that has come about as a result of the pressures of urban life (Winchell Et al. 2023). Crested anoles, who once lived only in forests, now scurry around towns and cities throughout the Caribbean. As a result of having to sprint across large open spaces, like hot streets and parking lots, they have developed longer limbs. City-living lizards also now sport longer toe pads with special scales that allow them to cling to smooth surfaces, like windows and walls (as well as the plastic patio furniture pictured in Figure 2.15), rather than to the rough surfaces of bark and rock that their forest-living relatives climb. These adaptations enhance their ability to escape predators and survive in cities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Researchers were curious to see if these changes were the result of genetic changes in urban populations, so they captured 96 male lizards in three Puerto Rican regions and compared their genomes to each other and to forest specimens in each location. They found that members of the three city-living populations were genetically distinct from each other, as well as from forest populations in their respective regions. In total, 33 genes in the urban lizards\u2019 genomes were different from their forest-living counterparts and were linked to urbanization. These changes are estimated to have occurred just within the last 30 to 80 generations, suggesting that selective pressures related to survival in urban environments is strong. As study coauthor Kristen Winchell put it, \u201cWe are watching evolution as it is unfolding\u201d (National Public Radio 2023). (If you are interested in hearing more about the study, see \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/post\/podcast\/lizards-adapt-urban-living\">How Lizards Adapt to Urban Living<\/a>,\u201d an episode of Science Sessions, a free podcast from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS 2023) featuring Dr. Winchell and her work.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Misconceptions About Evolution Through Natural Selection<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 3.1103515625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">After many years of teaching about evolution and natural selection, it continues to surprise me how many misconceptions exist about how the process works. If you do a web image search for \u201chuman evolution,\u201d the following image is likely to appear (Figure 2.16).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 605px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-6.png\" alt=\"Six increasingly upright figures walk in one direction.\" width=\"605\" height=\"222\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.16: An artist\u2019s visual representation of the process of human evolution. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Human_evolution_scheme.svg\">Human evolution scheme<\/a> by M. Garde is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 3.0211181640625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What is wrong with this picture? First, it implies that humans evolved from chimpanzees, which is incorrect. Although, as primates, we share a common ancestor very far back in time, we split from other primates, including our closest relatives, the nonhuman apes, several million years ago. This image also suggests that evolution is gradual and progressive; that it is intentional and directional; and that there is an end to it\u2014a stopping point. As you will be learning, evolution takes place in fits and starts, depending on the physical environment, changes in climate, food supply, predation, reproductive success, and other factors. It is also not intentional, in the sense that there is no predetermined end; in fact, if environmental conditions change, species can evolve in different directions or even go extinct. Evolution also does not necessarily progress in the same direction over time. One example is the eel-like creature <em>Qikiqtania wakei<\/em> that lived 375 million years ago. It was originally a fish that evolved to walk on land, then evolved to live back in the water. Early tetrapods like <em>Qikiqtania<\/em> were likely spending more and more time out of the water during this period. The arrangement of bones and joints in their fins was starting to resemble arms and legs, which would have allowed them to prop themselves up in shallow water and survive on mudflats. <em>Qikiqtania\u2019<\/em>s skeletal morphology, however, suggests that it then evolved from having rudimentary fingers and toes back to fins that allowed them to again swim in open water (Stewart Et al. 2022).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.869003295898438pt;margin-right: 11.6299438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">There is also the misperception that natural selection can create entirely new anatomical structures out of thin air in response to changes in environmental pressures. For example, when asked if they can think of ways in which modern humans are continuing to evolve biologically, students often postulate that, as a result of climate change, humans might rapidly develop gills, webbed hands and feet, and learn to breathe underwater in response to rising sea levels. Unfortunately, natural selection can only act on slight variations in anatomy that are already present, and we have no rudimentary physiological system for breathing underwater. Given that natural selection can only act upon existing variation, humans have evolved in such a way that many parts of our bodies are prone to injury. Our knees are one example. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in our knees is \u201cvulnerable to tearing in humans because our upright bipedal posture forces it to endure much more strain than it is designed to\u201d (Lents 2018, 23). When our ancestors made the transition from quadrupedalism to upright walking, we shifted from four bent legs to two straight legs, relying more on our bones than our muscles to support our weight. This is functional for normal walking and running in a straight line, but sudden shifts in direction and momentum, combined with the sizes and weights of modern humans, result in tears in an ACL that is simply not strong enough to bear the stress. If evolution had the capability to engineer a knee from scratch, it would look quite different, and any ligaments involved would likely be larger, stronger, and more flexible. For an interesting look at what anatomically modern humans might look like if we had evolved to withstand the stresses our bodies undergo in our present environment, see \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/tv\/documentaries\/this-is-what-the-perfect-body-looks-like-according-to-science\/\">This is what the perfect body looks like - according to science<\/a>,\u201d which was proposed by biological anthropologist Alice Roberts (Harrison 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 9.61920166015625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another misperception about evolution is that some species are \u201cmore evolved\u201d than others. Every species currently alive on the planet today is the result of millennia of natural selection that has rendered current members of that species well-adapted to their respective environments. Humans are no more \u201cevolved\u201d than fruit flies or yeast. What sets us apart are our cultural and technological abilities, which have allowed us to successfully survive in a wide variety of physical environments, many of which are now becoming too hot, too wet, or too dry to sustain human life without a great deal of technological intervention (IPCC 2022).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 366px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-3.jpg\" alt=\"A male dragonfly with a light blue body, transparent wings, and black markings rests on a twig.\" width=\"366\" height=\"282\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.17: Adult male Common Whitetail Dragonfly, <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/Libellula_lydia\">Libellula lydia<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cirrusimage.com\/dragonfly_common_whitetail.htm\">Common Whitetail Dragonfly \u2013 Plathemis lydia<\/a> by Bruce Marlin is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.5\">CC BY-SA 2.5 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>There is also some confusion about what \u201cfitness\u201d actually means and a failure to grasp that it changes as environmental conditions change. Evolutionary \u201cfitness\u201d is different from physical fitness. \u201cFitness\u201d in evolutionary terms refers to an individual\u2019s ability to survive and reproduce viable offspring who also survive and reproduce. Evolutionary fitness and reproductive success are highly dependent on specific environmental conditions, which can shift over time, greatly affecting the relative fitness of individuals in a population. Recent research on the impacts of climate change on dragonflies will serve to illustrate the point (Figure 2.17).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.748001098632812pt;margin-right: 3.8743896484375pt;text-indent: 0.594001770019531pt\">Pictured here is a male dragonfly, who, you will notice, has distinctive black markings on its wings. This is due to melanization. Males control breeding, and those with more ornamentation tend to attract more mates and to successfully ward off male competitors. Higher levels of melanization, however, have negative consequences for males in warming climates. The black markings absorb heat, elevating body temperatures, which can cause overheating, reduce male fighting ability, and even lead to death (Moore Et al. 2021). Females are not as adversely affected because they spend more time in shaded areas, while males are more often flying in sunlit areas, fending off rivals. However, as highly melanized males become less viable, wing coloration is undergoing selection in males. In other words, what constitutes being \u201cfit\u201d for males has changed, favoring those who have fewer of the black markings and, therefore, are less negatively impacted by warming temperatures. Note that natural selection acts on individuals, \u201cselecting\u201d those who happen to be fit for particular environmental conditions at a particular point in time. Evolution, though, happens at the level of the population. If the climate continues to warm, populations of dragonflies who inhabit warming areas will increasingly exhibit less ornamentation in males.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.858001708984375pt;margin-right: 5.50946044921875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lastly, natural selection can only act on characteristics that influence reproductive success. Deleterious traits that have nothing to do with one\u2019s ability to reproduce and successfully rear offspring to reproductive age will continue to be passed on. For example, the author of this chapter is a natural redhead, and redheads are predisposed genetically to a number of conditions that can negatively affect health (Colliss Harvey 2015), but some of these conditions are not diagnosed until later in life. One example is Parkinson\u2019s disease (Chen Et al. 2017), which is a degenerative neurological disorder. The average age of diagnosis of Parkinson\u2019s is 60 years of age, meaning redheads may encounter such a diagnosis well past childbearing age, having already passed on the genetic predisposition. Thus, Parkinson\u2019s disease cannot be selected out from the redhead family tree.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Are We Still Evolving?<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">After reading this chapter, many students are curious to know if humans are still evolving. The answer is yes. As a species, we continue to respond to selective pressures biologically and culturally. This final section will focus on three contemporary examples of human evolution. Before beginning, let\u2019s review the conditions necessary for natural selection to operate on a trait. First, the trait must be heritable, meaning it is transmitted genetically from generation to generation. There must also be variation of the trait within the population and the trait must influence reproductive success. Three examples of traits that meet these criteria are immunity to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), height, and wisdom teeth (Andrews, Kalinowski, &amp; Leonard 2011).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">AIDS is a potentially fatal infectious disease caused by HIV, a zoonosis believed to be derived from Simian Immunodeficiency Viruses (SIVs) found in chimpanzees and monkeys and most likely transmitted to humans through the butchering of infected animals (Sharp &amp; Hahn 2011). In total, 40 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses since the start of the global epidemic in the 1980s. There were 38.4 million people around the world living with AIDS as of 2021, including 1.5 million new cases and 650,000 deaths in that year alone (UNAIDS 2021). A disease causing this level of morbidity and mortality represents a major selective pressure, especially given that infection can occur before birth (Goulder Et al. 2016), thereby affecting future reproductive success.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 323px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-7.png\" alt=\"A political map of Europe and North Africa associated with percentages ranging from 0% to 16.4%.\" width=\"323\" height=\"391\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.19: Map of CCR5-delta32 allele distribution. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-11\/\">Map of CCR5-delta32 allele distribution (Figure 16.10)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/vectors\/europe-map-western-political-32847\/\">Europe Map Western Political 32847<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/clker-free-vector-images-3736\/\">Clker-Free-Vector-Images<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>; data from Solloch et al. 2017.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The majority of people in the world are highly susceptible to HIV infection, but some are not. These latter individuals are homozygous for a rare, recessive allele at the CCR5 locus that makes them immune to HIV. Heterozygotes who inherit a single copy of this allele are more resistant to infection and, when infected, the disease takes longer to progress in the event that they are infected. The mechanism by which the allele prevents infection involves a 32-base pair deletion in the DNA sequence of the CCR5 gene, creating a nonfunctioning receptor on the surface of the cell that prevents HIV from infecting the cell. The allele is inherited as a simple Mendelian trait, and there is variation in its prevalence, ranging as high as 14% of the population in northern Europe and Russia (Novembre, Galvani, and Slatkin 2005; see Figure 2.19). What is interesting about the allele\u2019s geographic distribution is that it does not map onto parts of the world with the highest rates of HIV infection (Figure 2.20), suggesting that AIDS was not the original selective pressure favouring this allele.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 498px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-8.png\" alt=\"World map with different HIV infection rates throughout the world.\" width=\"498\" height=\"253\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2.20: World map of countries shaded according to their HIV\/AIDS adult prevalence rate in 2020. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:World_map_of_countries_by_HIV-AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate_%282020%29.svg\">World map of countries by HIV-AIDS adult prevalence rate (2020)<\/a> by LuccaSSC has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Given its current geographic distribution, the bubonic plague, which ravaged Europe repeatedly from the 14th to the 19th centuries (Pamuk 2007), was initially proposed as the selective agent. Subsequent research suggests smallpox, which killed up to 400,000 people annually in 18th-century Europe (Hays 2005), was more likely the selective pressure (Novembre, Galvani, &amp; Slatkin 2005). Given the mortality rates for smallpox (Crosby 2003), an allele that conferred immunity was highly advantageous, as it is for those faced with the threat of HIV infection today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Height is another example of a trait experiencing selective pressure. If you have ever toured a historical site, you have likely hit your head on a doorframe or become claustrophobic trying to squeeze down a narrow hallway under a lower-than-average ceiling. It is not your imagination. Humans have gotten taller in recent centuries. In fact, the average height of people in industrialized nations has increased approximately 10 centimeters in the past 150 years. This increase has been attributed to improvements in nutrition, sanitation, and access to medical care (Hatton 2014). But this is only part of the story.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Height is highly heritable. Studies indicate 80% of variation in height within populations is due to genetics, with 697 different genetic variances identified as having an effect on adult stature (Devuyst 2014). Multiple studies also demonstrate a positive relationship between height and reproductive success for men (Andrews, Kalinowsky, &amp; Leonard 2011). This is primarily due to sexual selection and nonrandom mating, namely women\u2019s preferences for taller men, which may explain why height is one characteristic men often lie about on dating websites (Guadagno, Okdie, &amp; Kruse 2012). Sexual selection also plays out with regard to economic success in Western cultures, with taller men more likely to be in higher-level positions that pay well. Research demonstrates an inch of height is worth an additional $789 per year in salary, meaning a man who is six feet tall will earn on average $5,525 more per year than an identical man who is five foot five purely due to heightism bias (Gladwell 2007). Over the course of a career, this can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars, likely allowing taller men to attract more potential mates, increasing their reproductive success.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wisdom teeth are also undergoing evolutionary pressure. Have you or anyone in your family had their wisdom teeth removed? While it can be a painful and expensive process, it is a common experience in Western nations. It begs the question as to why there is no longer room in our mouths for all of our teeth? Biological anthropologist Daniel Lieberman offers several reasons, including that modern humans are growing faster and maturing earlier, which could be leading to impaction if skeletal growth takes place faster than dental growth. He also argues that the soft diets many modern humans consume generate insufficient strain to stimulate enough growth in our jaws to accommodate all of our teeth. Lastly, as the human brain has expanded over the past hundreds of thousands of years, it is taking up more space in the skull, causing the jaw to shrink, leaving no room for third molars (Lieberman 2011).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Conversely, do you know anyone whose wisdom teeth never came in? That is fairly common in some populations, suggesting evolutionary pressure favouring the absence of wisdom teeth has been culturally influenced. The oldest fossil evidence of skulls missing third molars was found in China and is 300,000 to 400,000 years old, suggesting the earliest mutation selecting against the eruption of wisdom teeth arose in Asia (Main 2013). Since that time, jaws have continued to decrease in size to the point they often cannot accommodate third molars, which can become impacted, painful, and even infected, a condition physical anthropologist Alan Main argues might have interfered with the ability to survive and reproduce in ancestral populations (Main 2013). As we have learned, a mutation that positively influences reproductive success\u2014such as being born without the trait to develop wisdom teeth\u2014would likely be selected for over time. Evidence in modern humans suggests that this is the case, with 40% of modern Asians and 45% of Native Alaskans and Greenlanders (populations descended from Asian populations) lacking wisdom teeth. The percentage among those of European descent ranges from 10 to 25% and for African Americans is 11% (Main 2013). Later chapters of this textbook emphasize that directional selection progresses along a particular path until the environment changes and a trait is no longer advantageous. In the case of wisdom teeth, the ability of modern dentistry to preempt impaction through surgery may, in fact, be what is preventing natural selection from doing away with wisdom teeth altogether.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 1.364006042480469pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Key Developments in Evolutionary Thought<\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 482.25pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">4th century BCE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Aristotle<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(384\u2013322 BCE)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cFounder of Biology.\u201d Publishes <em>History of Animals<\/em>, a biological classification system of over 500 animals based on structure, physiology, reproduction, and behavior. Also creates the \u201cGreat Chain of Being,\u201d ranking species and placing humans closest to God.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">8th\u20139th century CE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Al-Jahiz<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(776\u2013868 CE)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Writes seven-volume <em>Book of Animals<\/em>, which includes animal classifications and food chains. Introduces concept of biological evolution and its mechanisms.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1011\u20131021<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ibn al-Haythem<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(965\u20131040 CE)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cFather of Modern Optics.\u201d Uses experimental science to catalog how vision works and discovers laws of reflection and refraction. Publishes <em>Book of Optics<\/em> and invents <em>camera obscura<\/em>, the foundation for modern photography.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1620<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Francis Bacon<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1561\u20131626)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cFather of Empiricism.\u201d Publishes <em>The Novum Annum<\/em>, formulating the scientific method based on observation and inductive reasoning.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1686<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">John Ray<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1627\u20131705)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">First to publish a biological definition of <em>species<\/em> in <em>History of Plants<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1749<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Comte de Buffon<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1707\u20131788)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Publishes <em>Histoire Naturelle<\/em>, comparing anatomical structures across species using methods still in use today. Inspires Lamarck and Cuvier.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1758<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carl von Linne<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(Carolus Linnaeus)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1707\u20131778)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Introduces system of binomial nomenclature. Publishes <em>Systema Naturae<\/em>, the tenth edition of which introduces the designation <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>for humans.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1788<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">James Hutton<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1726\u20131797)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cFather of Geology.\u201d Publishes <em>Theory of the Earth<\/em>; introduces idea of Deep Time; explains how features of the earth were formed through the actions of rain, wind, rivers, and volcanic eruptions.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1798<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Thomas Malthus<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1766\u20131834)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Economist and \u201cFather of Statistics.\u201d Publishes <em>An Essay on Population<\/em>; introduces concept of carrying capacity; explains how populations outstrip the food supply, leaving some individuals to die off; inspires Darwin\u2019s idea of \u201cnatural selection.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1809<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jean-Baptiste Lamarck<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1744\u20131829)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Publishes theory of the Inheritance of acquired characteristics; is the first Western scientist to propose a mechanism explaining how traits change in species over time and to recognize the importance of the physical environment in acting on species and their survival.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1810<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Georges Cuvier<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1769\u20131832)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Paleontologist\/comparative anatomist; proved species went extinct; proposed the Theory of Catastrophism.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1830<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Charles Lyell<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1797\u20131875)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Establishes geology as a science. Publishes first edition of <em>The Principles of Geology <\/em>(1830\u201333); issuing 12 total editions in his lifetime, each updated according to new scientific data.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1858<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alfred Russel Wallace<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1823\u20131913)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sends scientific paper to Darwin titled \u201cOn the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type,\u201d essentially espousing the concept of natural selection; a reading of the papers by both Wallace and Darwin to the Linnaean Society is conducted by Lyell.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1859<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Charles Darwin<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1809\u20131882)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Publishes <em>On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection<\/em> (1859).<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1865<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gregor Mendel<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1822\u20131884)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Publishes <em>Experiments in Plant Hybridization<\/em> (1865), outlining the fundamentals of genetic inheritance.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1889<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">August Weismann<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1834\u20131914)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Publishes <em>Essays Upon Heredity <\/em>(1889), disproving the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Publishes <em>The Germ Plasm <\/em>(1892), postulating an early idea of inheritance through sexual reproduction.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1937<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Theodosius Dobzhansky<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">(1900\u20131975)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the founders of the Modern Synthesis of biology and genetics. Publishes <em>Genetics and the Origin of Species<\/em> (1937). Documents a genetic model of speciation through reproductive isolation.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2>Summary<\/h2>\n<p>Firstly, it is important to recognize that the global discourse on evolutionary thought emerged from a Western European colonial legacy; often centering eurocentric perspectives while overlooking other intellectual traditions. This legacy has resulted in a lasting influence in how the knowledge was\u2013and continues to be\u2013structured and understood.<\/p>\n<p>From its earliest ideas to today\u2019s genomic research, evolutionary thought has demonstrated that species, including our own, are not static, but are part of ongoing processes shaped by variation, natural selection, and shifting conditions. A persistent misconception is that evolution implies progress toward more advanced or \u2018better\u2019 forms; in reality, it reflects context-specific adaptations that enhance survival and reproduction. Humans exemplify this ongoing process, adapting through traits such as resistance to disease, tolerance of new foods, and responses to rapidly changing modern environments.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Summarize the major scientific developments that led to the formulation of the theory of natural selection.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how natural selection operates and how it leads to evolution in populations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain the importance of genetics to an understanding of human evolution.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Have you observed current examples of evolution taking place where you live? In which species? Which forces of evolution are involved?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.902000427246094pt;margin-right: 18.1800537109375pt;text-indent: 0.406997680664062pt\"><strong>Allele<\/strong>: A nonidentical DNA sequence found in the same gene location on a homologous chromosome, or gene copy, that codes for the same trait but produces a different phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 4.92626953125pt;text-indent: 0.34100341796875pt\"><strong>Artificial selection<\/strong>: The identification by humans of desirable traits in plants and animals, and the subsequent steps taken to enhance and perpetuate those traits in future generations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 0.62152099609375pt;text-indent: 0.461997985839844pt\"><strong>Binomial nomenclature<\/strong>: A system of classification in which a species of animal or plant receives a name consisting of two terms: the first identifies the genus to which it belongs, and the second identifies the species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 6.76727294921875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Carrying capacity<\/strong>: The number of living organisms, including animals, crops, and humans, that a geographic area can support without environmental degradation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.924003601074219pt;margin-right: 3.10675048828125pt;text-indent: 0.0879974365234375pt\"><strong>Catastrophism<\/strong>: The theory that the Earth\u2019s geology has largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. Compare to uniformitarianism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.924003601074219pt;margin-right: 3.10675048828125pt;text-indent: 0.0879974365234375pt\"><strong>Comparative anatomy<\/strong>: Georges-Louis Leclerc\u2019s technique of comparing similar anatomical structures across different species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.924003601074219pt;margin-right: 3.10675048828125pt;text-indent: 0.0879974365234375pt\"><strong>Creationism<\/strong>: The belief that the universe and all living organisms originate from specific acts of divine creation, as in the Biblical account, rather than by natural processes such as evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-right: 0.0257568359375pt\"><strong>Empiricism<\/strong>: The idea that all learning and knowledge derives from experience and observation. It became prominent in the 17th and 18th centuries in western Europe due to the rise of experimental science.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.858001708984375pt;margin-right: 53.6096496582031pt;text-indent: 0.44000244140625pt\"><strong>Evolution<\/strong>: In a biological sense, this term refers to cumulative inherited change in a population of organisms through time. More specifically, <em>evolution<\/em> is defined as a change in allele (gene) frequencies from one generation to the next among members of an interbreeding population.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.298004150390625pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Extant<\/strong>: Still in existence; surviving.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.199005126953125pt;margin-right: 19.8264770507812pt;text-indent: 0.0989990234375pt\"><strong>Extinct<\/strong>: Said of a species, family, or other group of animals or plants that has no living members; no longer in existence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 1.199005126953125pt;margin-right: 19.8264770507812pt;text-indent: 0.0989990234375pt\"><strong>Fixity of <\/strong><strong>Species<\/strong>: The idea that a species, once created, remains unchanged over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 6.576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Gene<\/strong>: A sequence of DNA that provides coding information for the construction of proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 6.576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Genetic drift<\/strong>: Random changes in allele frequencies within a population from one generation to the next.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 6.576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Gene flow<\/strong>: The introduction of new genetic material into a population through interbreeding between two distinct populations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 6.576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Gene pool<\/strong>: The entire collection of genetic material in a breeding community that can be passed from one generation to the next.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.836006164550781pt;margin-right: 6.576171875pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Genotype<\/strong>: The genotype of an organism is its complete set of genetic material\u2014its unique sequence of DNA. Genotype also refers to the alleles or variants an individual carries in a particular gene or genetic location.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 1.15521240234375pt;text-indent: 0.605003356933594pt\"><strong>Hybrid<\/strong>: Offspring of parents that differ in genetically determined traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.924003601074219pt;margin-right: 16.4979858398438pt;text-indent: 0.319000244140625pt\"><strong>Intelligent design<\/strong>: A pseudoscientific set of beliefs based on the notion that life on earth is so complex that it cannot be explained by the scientific theory of evolution and therefore must have been designed by a supernatural entity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.594001770019531pt;margin-right: 24.672607421875pt;text-indent: 0.681999206542969pt\"><strong>Macroevolution<\/strong>: Large and often-complex changes in biological populations, such as species formation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Microevolution<\/strong>: Changes in the frequency of a gene or allele in an interbreeding population.<\/p>\n<p><strong>M<\/strong><strong>odern synthesis<\/strong>: The mid\u201320th century merging of Mendelian genetics with Darwinian evolution that resulted in a unified theory of evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 3.12261962890625pt;text-indent: 0.583000183105469pt\"><strong>Natural selection<\/strong>: The natural process by which the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups within an interbreeding population that are best adjusted to their environment leads to the perpetuation of genetic qualities best suited to that particular environment at that point in time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 19.8097534179688pt;text-indent: 0.605003356933594pt\"><strong>Phenotype<\/strong>: The detectable or visible expression of an organism\u2019s <em>genotype<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.693000793457031pt;margin-right: 7.392578125pt;text-indent: 0.198005676269531pt\"><strong>Scientific method<\/strong>: A method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting of systematic observation, measurement, experimentation, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.858001708984375pt;margin-right: 2.66143798828125pt;text-indent: 0.0330047607421875pt\"><strong>Speciation<\/strong>: The process by which new genetically distinct species evolve from the main population, usually through geographic isolation or other barriers to gene flow.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0.858001708984375pt;margin-right: 2.66143798828125pt;text-indent: 0.0330047607421875pt\"><strong>Species<\/strong>: A group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus and denoted by a Latin binomial (e.g., <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.495002746582031pt;margin-right: 1.47552490234375pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Uniformitarian<\/strong><strong>ism<\/strong>: The theory that changes in the earth's crust during geologic history have resulted from the action of continuous and uniform processes\u2014such as wind, precipitation, evaporation, condensation, erosion, and volcanic action\u2014that continue to act in the present. Compare to <strong>c<\/strong><em>atastrophism<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Costa, James T. 2017. <em>Darwin\u2019s Backyard: How Small Experiments Led to a Big Theory<\/em>. New York: W.W. Norton.<\/p>\n<p>Darwin, Charles. 1905. <em>The Voyage of the Beagle<\/em>. (Originally published in 1839 as <em>Journal and Remarks<\/em>). [Author\u2019s note: Several editions exist with different publishers, including illustrated editions, paperback editions, and e-books.]<\/p>\n<p>Moore, John A. 1993. <em>Science as a Way of Knowing: The Foundations of Modern Biology<\/em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 29.0806274414062pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Al-Haytham, Ibn. 1011-1021. <em>Kit\u0101b al-Man\u0101\u1e93ir<\/em> (Book of Optics). Cairo, Egypt.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 29.0806274414062pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Al-Jahiz. 776\u2013868 CE. <em>Kitab al-Hayawan<\/em> (<em>Book of <\/em><em>Animals<\/em><em>).<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Andrews, Tessa M., Steven T. Kalinowski, and Mary J. Leonard. 2011. \u201cAre Humans Evolving? A Classroom Discussion to Change Students\u2019 Misconceptions Regarding Natural Selection.\u201d <em>Evolution: Education and Outreach<\/em> 4 (3): 456\u2013466.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Aristotle. 384-322 BCE. <em>History of <\/em><em>Animals<\/em><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Asghar, Anila, Salman Hameed, and Najme Kashani Farahani. 2014. \u201cEvolution in Biology Textbooks: A Comparative Analysis of Five Muslim Countries.\u201d Religion &amp; Education 41 (1). Accessed February 12, 2023. https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/15507394.2014.855081.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Associated Press. January 10, 2023. \u201cForest Lizards Have Genetically Morphed To Survive Life In The City, Researchers Say.\u201d <em>National Public Radio (NPR)<\/em>. Retrieved February 19, 2023 from https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2023\/01\/10\/1148150056\/forest-lizards-genetically-morphed-cities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 14.25pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Burkhardt, Richard W. 2013. \u201cLamarck, Evolution, and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.\u201d <em>Genetics<\/em> 194 (4): 793\u2013805.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 21.4119873046875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Chen, Xiqun, Danielle Feng, Michael A. Schwartzchild, and Xiang Gao. 2017. \u201cRed Hair, MC1R Variants, and Risk for Parkinson\u2019s Disease\u2014A Meta-Analysis.\u201d <em>Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology<\/em> 4 (3): 212\u2013216.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acn3.381.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 4.13275146484375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Colliss Harvey, Jacky. 2015. <em>Red: A History of the Redhead<\/em>. New York: Black Dog &amp; Levanthal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 4.13275146484375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Corning, Peter A. 2020. \u201cBeyond the Modern Synthesis: A Framework for a More Inclusive Biological Synthesis.\u201d <em>Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology<\/em> 153: 5\u201312.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.188232421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Costa, James T. 2017. <em>Darwin\u2019s Backyard: How Small Experiments Led to a Big Theory<\/em>. New York: W. W. Norton.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 27.93212890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Crosby, Alfred W., Jr. 2003. <em>The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492<\/em>. 30th Anniversary Edition. Westport, CT: Praeger.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 27.93212890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin, Charles. 1859. <em>On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. <\/em>First Edition. London: John Murray.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 35.9136962890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin, Francis, ed. 2001[1897]. <em>The Life &amp; Letters of Charles Darwin<\/em>, vol. 2. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 7.79656982421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Desilver, Drew. 2017. \u201cU.S. Students\u2019 Academic Achievement Still Lags That of Their Peers in Many Other Countries.\u201d Pew Research Center, February 15. Accessed May 25, 2022. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/fact-tank\/2017\/02\/15\/u-s-students-internationally-math-science\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Devuyst, Olivier. 2014. \u201cHigh Time for Human Height.\u201d <em>Peritoneal Dialysis International<\/em> 34 (7):685\u2013686.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1937. <em>Genetics and the Origin of Species<\/em>. Columbia University Biological Series (Volume 11). New York: Columbia University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.1101684570312pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne. 2014. <em>An Indigenous Peoples\u2019 History of the United States<\/em>. Boston: Beacon.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.1101684570312pt;text-indent: 0pt\">El-Zaher, Sumaya. 2018. \u201cThe Father of the Theory of Evolution: Al-Jahiz and His Book of Animals.\u201d MVSLIM.com, October 9. Accessed August 27, 2022. https:\/\/mvslim.com\/the-father-of-the-theory-of-evolution-al-jahiz-and-his-book-of-animals\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Elshakry, Marwa. 2010. \u201cWhen Science Became Western: Historiographical Reflections.\u201d <em>ISIS<\/em> 101 (1). Accessed November 20, 2022. <a class=\"rId107\" href=\"https:\/\/www.journals.uchicago.edu\/doi\/10.1086\/652691\">https:\/\/www.journals.uchicago.edu\/doi\/10.1086\/652691<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gladwell, Malcolm. 2007. <em>Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking<\/em>. New York: Back Bay<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Guadagno, Rosanna E., Bradley M. Okdie, and Sara A. Kruse. 2012. \u201cDating Deception: Gender, Online Dating, and Exaggerated Self-Presentation.\u201d <em>Computers in Human Behavior<\/em> 28 (2): 642\u2013647.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 47.9759521484375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Harmon, Katherine. 2011. \u201cEvolution Abroad: Creationism Evolves in Science Classrooms around the Globe.\u201d <em>Scientific American, <\/em>March 3. Accessed May 25, 2022. https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/evolution-education-abroad\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 47.9759521484375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Harrison, Ellie. 2018. \u201cThis is What the Perfect Body Looks Like - According to Science.\u201d <em>Radiotimes.com<\/em>. Accessed June 14, 2023. https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/tv\/documentaries\/this-is-what-the-perfect-body-looks-like-according-to-science\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hatton, Tim. 2014. \u201cWhy Did Humans Grow Four Inches in 100 Years? It Wasn\u2019t Just Diet.\u201d <em>The Conversation<\/em>, May 1. https:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-did-humans-grow-four-inches-In-100-years-it-wasnt-just-diet-25919.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hays, J. N. 2005. <em>Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History<\/em>. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hutton, James. 1788. <em>Theory of the Earth<\/em>. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Volume 1. Scotland: Royal Society of Edinburgh.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.458251953125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">IPCC. 2022. <em>Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. <\/em>Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by H.-O. P\u00f6rtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegr\u00eda, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. L\u00f6schke, V. M\u00f6ller, A. Okem, and B. Rama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/report\/ar6\/wg2\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.458251953125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Jones, Stephen. 2017. \u201cReligion, Science, and Evolutionary Theory\u201d[an interview with Salman Hameed]. Podcast, <em>The Religious Studies Project<\/em>, January 30. Accessed May 29, 2023. https:\/\/www.religiousstudiesproject.com\/podcast\/religion-science-and-evolutionary-theory\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.458251953125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Kutschera, Ulrich, and Karl J. Niklas. 2004. \u201cThe Modern Theory of Biological Evolution: An Expanded Synthesis.\u201d <em>Naturwissenschaften<\/em> 91: 255\u2013276.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 2.458251953125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Leclerc, Georges-Louis, Comte de Buffon. 1749-1804. <em>Histoire Naturelle<\/em>. Volumes 1-36. Paris: <em>Imprimerie Royale <\/em>(Royal Printing House).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 31.8324584960938pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lents, Nathan H. 2018. <em>Human Errors: A Panorama of Our Glitches, from Pointless Bones to Broken Genes. <\/em>Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 31.8324584960938pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lerner, Lawrence S. 2000. <em>Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution in the States<\/em>. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E. 2011. <em>The Evolution of the Human Head<\/em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.0872802734375pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lindberg, David C. 1992. <em>The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450<\/em>. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Linnaeus, Carl. 1736. <em>Systema Naturae<\/em>. First Edition. Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 21.6511840820312pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Love, Shayla. 2020. \u201cA Thousand Years before Darwin, Islamic Scholars Were Writing about Evolution.\u201d VICE World News, October 5. Accessed August 27, 2022. https:\/\/www.vice.com\/en\/article\/ep4ykn\/a-thousand-years-before-darwin-islamic-scholars-were-writing-about-natural-selection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Main, Douglas. 2013. \u201cAncient Mutation Explains Missing Wisdom Teeth.\u201d <em>Live Science<\/em>, March 13. https:\/\/www.livescience.com\/27529-missing-wisdom-teeth.html.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1798. <em>An Essay on the Principle of Population<\/em>. London: J. Johnson.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Masci, David. 2019. \u201cFor Darwin Day, 6 Facts About the Evolution Debate.\u201d Pew Research Center. Accessed June 14, 2023. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/short-reads\/2019\/02\/11\/darwin-day\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Masood, Ehsan. 2009. \u201cIslam\u2019s Evolutionary Legacy.\u201d <em>The Guardian<\/em>, March 1. Accessed February 13, 2023. https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/belief\/2009\/feb\/27\/islam-religion-evolution-science.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Miller, Jon D., Eugenie C. Scott, Mark S. Ackerman, Belen Laspra, Glenn Branch, Carmelo Polino, and Jordan S. Huffaker. 2022. \u201cPublic Acceptance of Evolution in the United States, 1985\u20132020.\u201d <em>Public Understanding of Science<\/em> 31 (2): 223\u2013238.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Miller, Jon D., Eugenie C. Scott, and Shinji Okamoto. 2006, August 11. \u201cPublic Acceptance of Evolution.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 313 (5788): 765-766. <a class=\"rId108\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1126746\">DOI: 10.1126\/science.1126746<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 46.4606018066406pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Moore, John A. 1993. <em>Science as a Way of Knowing: The Foundations of Modern Biology<\/em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 46.4606018066406pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Moore, Michael P., Kaitlyn Hersch, Chanont Sricharoen, Sarah Lee, Caitlin Reice, Paul Rice, Sophie Kronick, Kim A. Medley, and Kasey D. Fowler-Finn. 2021. \u201cSex-Specific Ornament Evolution Is a Consistent Feature of Climatic Adaptation across Space and Time in Dragonflies.\u201d <em>PNAS <\/em>118 (28): e2101458118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.210145818.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">National Public Radio. 2023. \u201cForest Lizards Have Genetically Morphed to Survive Life in the City, Researchers Say.\u201d <em>National Public Radio (NPR), <\/em>January 10. Accessed February 19, 2023. https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2023\/01\/10\/1148150056\/forest-lizards-genetically-morphed-cities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 46.4606018066406pt;text-indent: 0pt\">National Science Foundation. 2023. \u201cUrban Lizards Share Genomic Markers Not Found in Forest-Dwellers.\u201d National Science Foundation, February 7. Accessed May 25, 2023. <a class=\"rId109\" href=\"https:\/\/beta.nsf.gov\/news\/urban-lizards-share-genomic-markers-not-found\">https:\/\/beta.nsf.gov\/news\/urban-lizards-share-genomic-markers-not-found<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Novembre, John, Alison P. Galvani, and Montgomery Slatkin. 2005. \u201cThe Geographic Spread of the CCR5 \u039432 HIV-Resistance Allele.\u201d <em>PLoS Biology<\/em> 3 (11): e339.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pamuk, \u015eevket. 2007. \u201cThe Black Death and the Origins of the \u2018Great Divergence\u2019 across Europe, 1300\u20131600.\u201d <em>European Review of Economic History<\/em> 11 (3): 289\u2013317.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 26.6983642578125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Paterlini, Marta. 2007. \u201cThere Shall Be Order: The Legacy of Linnaeus in the Age of Molecular Biology.\u201d <em>EMBO Reports<\/em> 8 (9): 814\u2013816. <a class=\"rId110\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.embor.7401061\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.embor.7401061<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 26.6983642578125pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pew Research Center. 2019. \u201cDarwin in America: The Evolution Debate in the United States.\u201d Pew Research Center, February 6, 2019. Accessed June 13, 2023. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/religion\/2019\/02\/06\/darwin-in-america-2\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 35.9031982421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pew Research Center. 2014. \u201cFighting Over Darwin, State by State.\u201d Pew Research Center, February 4, 2009; updated February 3, 2014. Accessed May 25, 2022. <a class=\"rId111\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/religion\/2009\/02\/04\/fighting-over-darwin-state-by-state\/\">https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/religion\/2009\/02\/04\/fighting-over-darwin-state-by-state\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 35.9031982421875pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Plutynski, Anya. 2009. \u201cThe Modern Synthesis.\u201d <em>Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/em>, November 15 (updated December 14, 2009). Accessed November 27, 2022. https:\/\/philsci-archive.pitt.edu\/15335\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.7255249023438pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Plutzer, Eric, Glenn Branch, and Ann Reid. 2020. \u201cTeaching Evolution in the U.S. Public Schools: A Continuing Challenge.\u201d <em>Evolution: Education and Outreach<\/em>13: Article 14. https:\/\/evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12052-020-00126-8.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.7255249023438pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). 2023. \u201cHow Lizards Adapt to Urban Living.\u201d <em>Science Sessions Podcast, <\/em>February 13, . Accessed February 19, 2023. https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/post\/podcast\/lizards-adapt-urban-living.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.7255249023438pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Public Broadcasting System. 2001. \u201cGeorges Cuvier.\u201d <em>WGBH Evolution Library<\/em>. Accessed May 26, 2022. https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/evolution\/library\/02\/1\/l_021_01.html# :~:text=With%20elegant%20studies%20of%20the,as%20incontrovertible%20proof%20of %20extinctions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.7255249023438pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ray, John. 1686-1704. <em>Historia plantarum<\/em>. London: Clark. Volume 1 (1686), Volume II (1688), Volume III (1704).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 15.7255249023438pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Richards, Richard A. 1998. \u201cDarwin, Domestic Breeding, and Artificial Selection.\u201d <em>Endeavour<\/em> 22 (3): 106\u2013109.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0.891006469726562pt;margin-right: 12.08837890625pt;text-indent: 0.648994445800781pt\">Solloch, Ute V., Kathrin Lang, Vinzenz Lange, and Irena B\u00f6hme. 2017. \u201cFrequencies of Gene Variant CCR5-\u039432 in 87 Countries Based on Next-Generation Sequencing of 1.3 Million Individuals Sampled from 3 National DKMS Donor Centers.\u201d <em>Human Immunology<\/em> 78 (11\u201312): 701-717.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 26.1246337890625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stewart, Thomas A., Justin B. Lemberg, Ailis Daly, Edward B. Daeschler, and Neil H. Shubin. 2022. \u201cA New Epistostegalian from the Late Devonian of the Canadian Arctic.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 608 (7923): 563\u2013568.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 14.37353515625pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Tasci, Ufuk Necat. 2020. \u201cHow a 10-Century Muslim Physicist Discovered How Humans See.\u201d <em>T<\/em><em>RT World<\/em>, May 25. Accessed May 18, 2022. https:\/\/www.trtworld.com\/magazine\/how-a-10th-century-muslim-physicist-discovered-how-humans-see-36620.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Tbakhi, Abdelghani, and Samir S. Amr. 2007. \u201cIbn Al-Haytham: Father of Modern Optics.\u201d <em>Annals of Saudi Medicine<\/em> 27 (6): 464\u2013467. UNAIDS. 2021. \u201cGlobal HIV &amp; AIDS Statistics\u2014Fact Sheet.\u201d https:\/\/www.unaids.org\/en\/resources\/fact-sheet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-right: 48.1709594726562pt\">UNESCO.org. 2015. \u201cInternational Year of Light: Ibn al Haytham, Pioneer of Modern Optics celebrated at UNESCO<em>.<\/em>\u201d UNESCO, September 8. Accessed May 18, 2022. https:\/\/www.unesco.org\/en\/articles\/international-year-light-ibn-al-haytham-pioneer-modern-optics-celebrated-unesco.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-right: 48.1709594726562pt\">University of California Berkeley Museum of Paleontology. N.d. \u201cThe History of Evolutionary Thought\u2014Uniformitarianism: Charles Lyell.\u201d <em>Understanding Evolution <\/em>website. Accessed February 13, 2023. https:\/\/evolution.berkeley.edu\/the-history-of-evolutionary-thought\/1800s\/uniformitarianism-charles-lyell\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-right: 48.1709594726562pt\">University of Cambridge. N.d. \u201cDarwin and Dogs.\u201d <em>The Darwin Correspondence Project <\/em>website. Accessed February 17, 2023. https:\/\/www.darwinproject.ac.uk\/commentary\/curious\/darwin-and-dogs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-right: 48.1709594726562pt\">Urbach, Peter Michael, Anthony M. Quinton, and Kathleen Marguerite Lea. \u201cFrancis Bacon: British Author, Philosopher, and Statesman.\u201d <em>Encyclopaedia Britannica<\/em>. Last updated May 12, 2023. https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Francis-Bacon-Viscount-Saint-Alban.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ward, Peter. 2018. <em>Lamarck\u2019s Revenge: How Epigenetics Is Revolutionizing Our Understanding<\/em> <em>of Evolution\u2019s Past and Present. <\/em>New York: Bloomsbury.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Weismann, August. 1892. <em>Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung<\/em> (<em>The Germ Plasm: a Theory of Inheritance<\/em>). Jena (Germany): Fischer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Weismann, August. 1889. Translations. <em>Essays upon Heredity<\/em>. Oxford: Clarendon. Accessed November 27, 2022. E-copy available at https:\/\/www.esp.org\/books\/weismann\/essays\/facsimile\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Winchell, Kristen M., Shane C. Campbell-Staton, Jonathan B. Losos, and Anthony Geneva. 2023. \u201cGenome-Wide Parallelism Underlies Contemporary Adaptation In Urban Lizards.\u201d <em>PNAS<\/em> 120 (3): e2216789120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2216789120.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wood, Bernard. 2005. <em>Human Evolution: A Very Short Introduction<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 17.7549438476562pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Zou, Yawen. 2015. \"The Germ-Plasm: a Theory of Heredity (1893), by August Weismann.\" <em>Embryo Project Encyclopedia<\/em>, January 26. Accessed February 18, 2023. https:\/\/embryo.asu.edu\/handle\/10776\/8284.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_938\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_938\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Hayley Mann, M.A., Binghamton University<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors for this chapter: <em>Emma Costa, Shima Gahima, Will Lefebvre, Audrey Ch\u00e9kina\u00ebl<\/em><\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>This chapter is a revision from <\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\"><em>\"Chapter 3: Molecular Biology and Genetics\"<\/em><\/a><em> by Hayley Mann, Xazmin Lowman, and Malaina Gaddis. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain and identify the purpose of both DNA replication and the cell cycle.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify key differences between mitosis and meiosis.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Outline the process of protein synthesis, including transcription and translation.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Use principles of Mendelian inheritance to predict genotypes and phenotypes of future generations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain complexities surrounding patterns of genetic inheritance and polygenic traits.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Discuss challenges to and bioethical concerns of genetic testing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">I [Hayley Mann] started my Bachelor\u2019s degree in 2003, which was the same year the Human Genome Project released its first draft sequence. I initially declared a genetics major because I thought it sounded cool. However, upon taking an actual class, I discovered that genetics was <em>challenging<\/em>. In addition to my genetics major, I signed up for biological anthropology classes and soon learned that anthropology could bring all those molecular lessons to life. For instance, we are composed of cells, proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids. Anthropologists often include these molecules in their studies to identify how humans vary; if there are meaningful differences, they propose theories to explain them. Anthropologists study biomolecules in both living and ancient individuals. Ancient biomolecules can also be found on artifacts such as stone tools and cooking vessels. Over the years, scientific techniques for studying organic molecules have improved, which has unlocked new insights into the deep human past.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Cells and Molecules<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Molecules of Life<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All organisms are composed of four basic types of molecules that are essential for cell structure and function: proteins<strong>, <\/strong>lipids<strong>, <\/strong>carbohydrates, and nucleic acids (Figure 4.1). <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_586\">Proteins<\/a> <\/strong>are crucial for cell shape and nearly all cellular tasks, including receiving signals from outside the cell and mobilizing intra-cellular responses. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_588\">Lipids<\/a> <\/strong>are a class of organic compounds that include fats, oils, and hormones.\u00a0<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_590\">Carbohydrates<\/a><\/strong> are sugar molecules and serve as energy to cells in the form of glucose. Lastly, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_592\">nucleic acids<\/a><\/strong>, including <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_594\">deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)<\/a><\/strong>, carry genetic information about a living organism.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 740px;height: 551px\" border=\"1pt solid rgb(0, 0, 0)\" cellpadding=\"5pt\">\n<caption>Figure 4.1: Information about the four biomolecules. Credit: Biomolecules Table original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Hayley Mann is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 40px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 125.594px;height: 40px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecule<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 223.906px;height: 40px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Definition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 346.562px;height: 40px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Example<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 194px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 125.594px;height: 194px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 223.906px;height: 194px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Composed of one or more long chains of amino acids (i.e., basic units of protein)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Often folded into complex 3D shapes that relate to function<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins interact with other types of proteins and molecules<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 346.562px;height: 194px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Proteins come in different categories including structural (e.g., collagen, keratin, lactase, hemoglobin, cell membrane proteins), defense proteins (e.g, antibodies), enzymes (e.g., lactase), hormones (e.g., insulin), and motor proteins (e.g., actin)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 137px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 125.594px;height: 137px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lipids<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 223.906px;height: 137px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Insoluble in water due to hydrophilic (water-loving) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 346.562px;height: 137px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fats, such as triglycerides, store energy for your body<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Steroid hormones (e.g., estrogen and testosterone) act as chemical messengers to communicate between cells and tissues, as well as biochemical pathways inside of the cell<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 80px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 125.594px;height: 80px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carbohydrates<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 223.906px;height: 80px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large group of organic molecules that are composed of carbon and hydrogen atoms<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 346.562px;height: 80px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Starches and sugars, including blood glucose, provide cells with energy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a-R\" style=\"height: 78px\">\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 125.594px;height: 78px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleic Acids<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 223.906px;height: 78px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carries the genetic information of an organism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;width: 346.562px;height: 78px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">RNA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Cells<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1665, Robert Hooke observed slices of plant cork using a microscope. Hooke noted that the microscopic plant structures he saw resembled <em>cella,<\/em> meaning \u201ca small room\u201d in Latin. Approximately two centuries later, biologists recognized the cell as being the most fundamental unit of life and that all life is composed of cells. Cellular organisms can be characterized as two main cell types: <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_596\">prokaryotes<\/a><\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_598\">eukaryotes<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.2).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_77\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77\" style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"\/explorationsclone\/part\/figure-3-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"wp-image-70\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/cellsfinal-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Prokaryote and eukaryote cells. A full text description of this image is available using link in the caption.\" width=\"468\" height=\"370\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-77\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.2: Prokaryotic cell and eukaryotic cell. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: Prokaryote vs. eukaryote original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Prokaryotes include bacteria and archaea, and they are composed of a single cell. Additionally, their DNA and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_600\">organelles<\/a><\/strong> are not surrounded by individual membranes. Thus, no compartments separate their DNA from the rest of the cell (see Figure 4.2). It is well known that some bacteria can cause illness in humans. For instance, <em>Escherichia coli<\/em> (<em>E. coli<\/em>) and <em>Salmonella<\/em> contamination can result in food poisoning symptoms. Pneumonia and strep throat are caused by <em>Streptococcal<\/em> bacteria. <em>Neisseria gonorrhoeae<\/em> is a sexually transmitted bacterial disease. Although bacteria are commonly associated with illness, not all bacteria are harmful. For example, researchers are studying the relationship between the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_602\">microbiome<\/a> <\/strong>and human health. The bacteria that are part of the healthy human microbiome perform beneficial roles, such as digesting food, boosting the immune system, and even making vitamins (e.g., B12 and K).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Eukaryotes can be single-celled or multi-celled in their body composition. In contrast to prokaryotes, eukaryotes possess membranes that surround their DNA and organelles. An example of a single-celled eukaryote is the microscopic algae found in ponds (phytoplankton), which can produce oxygen from the sun. Yeasts are also single-celled, and fungi can be single- or multicellular. Plants and animals are all multicellular.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although plant and animal cells have a surprising number of similarities, there are some key differences (Figure 4.3). For example, plant cells possess a thick outer cell membrane made of a fibrous carbohydrate called cellulose. Animal and plant cells also have different <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_604\">tissues<\/a><\/strong>. For most plants, the outermost layer of cells forms a waxy cuticle that helps to protect the cells and to prevent water loss. Humans have skin, which is the outermost cell layer that is predominantly composed of a tough protein called keratin. Overall, humans have a diversity of tissue types (e.g., cartilage, brain, and heart).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_77-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77-2\" style=\"width: 2560px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-71 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/3.x3ai-01-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Plant and animal cells. A full text description of this image is available using link in the caption.\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1162\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-77-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.3: Plant cell compared to an animal cell. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Simple_plant_and_animal_cell.svg\">Simple plant and animal cell<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Nefronus\">Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kebert<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.umimeto.org\/\">umimeto.org<\/a> has been modified (labels added) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Animal Cell Organelles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An animal cell is surrounded by a double membrane called the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_606\">phospholipid bilayer<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.4). A closer look reveals that this protective barrier is made of lipids and proteins that provide structure and function for cellular activities, such as regulating the passage of molecules and ions (e.g., H<sub>2<\/sub>O and sodium) into and out of the cell. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_608\">Cytoplasm<\/a><\/strong> is the jelly-like matrix inside of the cell membrane. Part of the cytoplasm comprises organelles, which perform different specialized tasks for the cell (Figure 4.5). An example of an organelle is the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_610\">nucleus<\/a><\/strong>, where the cell\u2019s DNA is located.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 555px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1.png\" alt=\"Cell wall of a phospholipid bilayer with embedded channels, carbohydrates, and proteins.\" width=\"555\" height=\"270\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.4: A phospholipid bilayer with membrane-bound carbohydrates and proteins. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/anatomy-and-physiology\/pages\/3-1-the-cell-membrane#fig-ch03_01_03\">Cell Membrane (Anatomy &amp; Physiology, Figure 3.4)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 547px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-1.png\" alt=\"Animal cell with various organelles labeled.\" width=\"547\" height=\"415\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.5: An animal cell with membrane-enclosed organelles. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/Organelle?id=147\">Organelle<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another organelle is the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_612\">mitochondrion<\/a><\/strong>. Mitochondria are often referred to as \u201cpowerhouse centers\u201d because they produce energy for the cell in the form of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_616\">adenosine triphosphate (ATP)<\/a><\/strong>. Depending on the species and tissue type, multicellular eukaryotes can have hundreds to thousands of mitochondria in each of their cells. Scientists have determined that mitochondria were once <em>symbiotic<\/em> prokaryotic organisms (i.e., helpful bacteria) that transformed into cellular organelles over time. This evolutionary explanation helps explain why mitochondria also have their own DNA, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_618\">mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)<\/a><\/strong>. All organelles have important physiological functions and disease can occur when organelles do not perform their role optimally. Figure 4.6 lists other organelles found in the cell and their specialized cellular roles.<\/p>\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 399pt\" border=\"1pt solid rgb(0, 0, 0)\" cellpadding=\"5pt\">\n<caption>Figure 4.6: This table depicts the names of organelles and their cellular functions. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Cell Structure table (Figure 3.11)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Hayley Mann, Xazmin Lowman, and Malaina Gaddis is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell structure<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Description<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 36pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Centrioles<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Assist with the organization of mitotic spindles, which extend and contract for the purpose of cellular movement during mitosis and meiosis.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 36pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cytoplasm<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gelatinous fluid located inside of cell membrane that contains organelles.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuous membrane with the nucleus that helps transport, synthesize, modify, and fold proteins. Rough ER has embedded ribosomes, whereas smooth ER lacks ribosomes.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Golgi body<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Layers of flattened sacs that receive and transmit messages from the ER to secrete and transport proteins within the cell.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lysosome<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Located in the cytoplasm; contains enzymes to degrade cellular components.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Microtubule<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Involved with cellular movement including intracellular transport and cell division.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mitochondrion<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Responsible for cellular respiration, where energy is produced by converting nutrients into ATP.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleolus<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Resides inside of the nucleus and is the site of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_620\">ribosomal RNA (rRNA)<\/a><\/strong> transcription, processing, and assembly.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\" style=\"height: 24pt\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleopore<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pores in the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_622\">nuclear envelope<\/a><\/strong> that are selectively permeable.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nucleus<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Contains the cell\u2019s DNA and is surrounded by the nuclear envelope.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"a0-R\">\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ribosome<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"a0-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Located in the cytoplasm and also the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Messenger RNA (mRNA) binds to ribosomes and proteins are synthesized.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Introduction to Genetics<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetics is the study of heredity. Biological parents pass down their genetic traits to their offspring. Although children resemble their parents, genetic traits often vary in appearance or molecular function. For example, two parents with normal color vision can sometimes produce a son with red-green colorblindness. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_624\">Molecular geneticists<\/a> <\/strong>study the biological mechanisms responsible for creating variation between individuals, such as DNA <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_626\">mutations<\/a><\/strong> (see Chapter 5), cell division, and genetic regulation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_628\">Molecular anthropologists<\/a><\/strong> use genetic data to test anthropological questions. Some of these anthropologists utilize <strong>ancient DNA (aDNA)<\/strong>, which is DNA that is extracted from anything once living, including human, animal, and plant remains. Over time, DNA becomes degraded (i.e., less intact), but specialized laboratory techniques can make copies of short degraded aDNA segments, which can then be reassembled to provide more complete DNA information.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Structure<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The discovery, in 1953, of the molecular structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was one of the greatest scientific achievements of all time. Using X-ray crystallography, Rosalind Franklin (Figure 4.7) provided an image that clearly showed the double helix shape of DNA. Due to controversy, Franklin\u2019s colleagues received more recognition for the DNA discovery. In 1962, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins won the Nobel Prize, while Franklin, who had died in 1958, was not honoured. Today, her vital contributions and scientific skill are widely recognized.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 223px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-1.png\" alt=\"Historic photo of woman looking into a microscope.\" width=\"223\" height=\"268\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.7: Chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Rosalind_Franklin.jpg\">Rosalind Franklin<\/a> from the personal collection of Jenifer Glynn by MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The double helix shape of DNA can be described as a twisted ladder (Figure 4.8). More specifically, DNA is a double-stranded molecule with its two strands oriented in opposite directions (i.e., antiparallel). Each strand is composed of <strong>nucleotides <\/strong>with a<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_634\">sugar phosphate backbone<\/a><\/strong>. There are four different types of DNA nucleotides: adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G). The two DNA strands are held together by nucleotide <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_636\">base pairs<\/a><\/strong>, which have chemical bonding rules. The complementary base-pairing rules are as follows: A and T bond with each other, while C and G form a bond. The chemical bonds between A-T and C-G are formed by \u201cweak\u201d hydrogen atom interactions, which means the two strands can be easily separated. A DNA sequence is the order of nucleotide bases (A, T, G, C) along only one DNA strand. If one DNA strand has the sequence CATGCT, then the other strand will have a complementary sequence GTACGA. This is an example of a short DNA sequence. In reality, there are approximately three billion DNA base pairs in human cells.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 341px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3.jpg\" alt=\"Double helix structure of DNA.\" width=\"341\" height=\"400\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.8: Structural components that form double-stranded nucleic acid (DNA). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Difference_DNA_RNA-EN.svg\">Difference DNA RNA-EN<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a> (translation by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a>, cropped by Katie Nelson) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Is Highly Organized within the Nucleus<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">If you removed the DNA from a single human cell and stretched it out completely, it would measure approximately two meters (about 6.5 feet). Therefore, DNA molecules must be compactly organized in the nucleus. To achieve this, the double helix configuration of DNA undergoes coiling. An analogy would be twisting a string until coils are formed and then continuing to twist so that secondary coils are formed, and so on. To assist with coiling, DNA is first wrapped around proteins called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_638\">histones<\/a><\/strong>. This creates a complex called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_640\">chromatin<\/a>,<\/strong> which resembles \u201cbeads on a string\u201d (Figure 4.9). Next, chromatin is further coiled into a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_642\">chromosome<\/a><\/strong>. Another important feature of DNA is that chromosomes can be altered from tightly coiled (chromatin) to loosely coiled (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_644\">euchromatin<\/a><\/strong>). Most of the time, chromosomes in the nucleus remain in a euchromatin state so that DNA sequences are accessible for regulatory processes to occur.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 558px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-2.png\" alt=\"Illustrates how chromosomes are made up of various components. \" width=\"558\" height=\"534\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.9: The hierarchical organization of chromosomes. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>.\u00a0Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/glossary\/index.cfm?id=102\">Histone (2019)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 256px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-1.png\" alt=\"Chromatid is divided into a short and long arm, bound by a centromere. \" width=\"256\" height=\"296\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.10: The regions of a chromosome. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Chromosome (Figure 3.16)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p>Human body cells typically have 23 pairs of chromosomes, for a total of 46 chromosomes in each cell\u2019s nucleus. An interesting fact is that the number of chromosomes an organism possesses varies by species, and this figure is not dependent upon the size or complexity of the organism. For instance, chimpanzees have a total of 48 chromosomes, while hermit crabs have 254. Chromosomes also have a distinct physical structure, including <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_646\">centromeres<\/a> <\/strong>(the \u201ccenter\u201d) and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_648\">telomeres<\/a> <\/strong>(the ends) (Figure 4.10). Because of the centromeric region, chromosomes are described as having two different \u201carms,\u201d where one arm is long and the other is shorter. Centromeres play an important role during cell division, which will be discussed in the next section. Telomeres are located at the ends of chromosomes; they help protect the chromosomes from degradation after every round of cell division.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: First Nation Immunity and European Diseases\u2014A Study of Ancient DNA<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-1.png\" alt=\"A group of people in historic clothing, some with traditional shawls, eat under a tent.\" width=\"300\" height=\"184\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.11a: Tsimshian Native Americans of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/central.bac-lac.gc.ca\/.redirect?app=fonandcol&amp;id=3368729&amp;lang=eng\">A group of Tsimshian people having a tea party in a tent, Lax Kw'alaams (formerly Port Simpson), B.C., c. 1890<\/a> by unknown photographer is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/pdm\">Public Domain<\/a>. This image is available from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/Pages\/home.aspx\">Library and Archives Canada<\/a>, item number 3368729.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Beginning in the early fifteenth century, First Nations progressively suffered from high mortality rates as the result of colonization from foreign powers. European-borne diseases such as measles, tuberculosis, influenza, and smallpox are largely responsible for the population collapse of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. Many Europeans who immigrated to the Americas had lived in large sedentary populations, which also included coexisting with domestic animals and pests. Although a few prehistoric Indigenous populations can be characterized as large agricultural societies (especially in Mesoamerica), their overall culture, community lifestyle, and subsistence practices were markedly different from that of Europeans. Therefore, because they did not share the same urban living environments as Europeans, it is believed that Indigenous peoples were susceptible to many European diseases.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 459px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6.jpg\" alt=\"Tsimshian territory on the coast of British Columbia next to the Hecate Strait.\" width=\"459\" height=\"594\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.11b: Tsimshian territory in present-day British Columbia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Tsimshian Territory map (Figure 3.12b)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at<a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\"> GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In 2016, a <em>Nature<\/em> article published by John Lindo and colleagues was the first to investigate whether pre-contact Indigenous peoples possessed a genetic susceptibility to European diseases. Their study included Tsimshians, a First Nation community from British Columbia (Figure 4.11a-b). DNA from both present-day and ancient individuals (who lived between 500 and 6,000 years ago) was analyzed. The research team discovered that a change occurred in the <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> gene, which is a member of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) immune system molecules. MHC molecules are responsible for detecting and triggering an immune response against pathogens. Lindo and colleagues (2016) concluded that <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> gene helped Indigenous peoples adapt to their local environmental ecology. However, when European-borne epidemics occurred in the Northwest during the 1800s, a certain <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_650\">DNA sequence<\/a><\/strong> variant (allele) associated with ancient Tsimshian immunity was no longer adaptive. As the result of past selective pressures from European diseases, present-day Tsimshians have different <em>HLA-DQA1<\/em> allele frequencies. The precise role that <em>HLA-DQA1 <\/em>plays in immune adaptation requires further investigation. But overall, this study serves as an example of how studying ancient DNA from the remains of deceased individuals can help provide insight into living human populations and historical events.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">DNA Replication and Cell Division<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For life to continue and flourish, cells must be able to divide. Tissue growth and cellular damage repair are also necessary to maintain an organism throughout its life. All these rely on the dynamic processes of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_652\">DNA replication<\/a><\/strong> and the <strong>cell cycle<\/strong>. The mechanisms highlighted in this section are tightly regulated and represent only part of the life cycle of a cell.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Replication <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication is the process by which new DNA is copied from an original DNA template. It is one phase of the highly coordinated cell cycle, and it requires a variety of enzymes with special functions. The creation of a complementary DNA strand from a template strand is described as <strong>semi-conservative replication<\/strong>. The result of semi-conservative replication is two separate double-stranded DNA molecules, each of which is composed of an original \u201cparent\u201d template strand and a newly synthesized \u201cdaughter\u201d DNA strand.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication progresses in three steps referred to as <strong>initiation<\/strong>, <strong>elongation,<\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_662\">termination<\/a><\/strong>. During initiation, enzymes are recruited to specific sites along the DNA sequence (Figure 4.12). For example, an initiator enzyme, called <strong>helicase<\/strong>, \u201cunwinds\u201d DNA by breaking the hydrogen bonds between the two parent strands. The unraveling of the helix into two separated strands exposes the strands and creates a fork, which is the active site of DNA replication.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 580px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7.jpg\" alt=\"Helicase enzyme splits apart 2 DNA strands. On each strand DNA polymerase matches free nucleotides.\" width=\"580\" height=\"359\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.12: DNA replication and the different enzymes associated with it. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:0323_DNA_Replication.jpg\">0323 DNA Replication<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/anatomy-and-physiology\/pages\/1-introduction\">OpenStax<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Elongation is the assembly of new DNA daughter strands from the exposed original parent strands. The two parent strands can further be classified as <strong>leading strand<\/strong> or <strong>lagging strand<\/strong> and are distinguished by the direction of replication. Enzymes called <strong>DNA polymerases<\/strong> read parent template strands in a specific direction. Complementary nucleotides are added, and the newly formed daughter strands will grow. On the leading parent strand, a DNA polymerase will create one continuous strand. The lagging parent strand is created in several disconnected sections and other enzymes fill in the missing nucleotide gaps between these sections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, termination refers to the end of DNA replication activity. It is signaled by a stop sequence in the DNA that is recognized by machinery at the replication fork. The end result of DNA replication is that the number of chromosomes are doubled so that the cell can divide into two.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA Mutations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication should result in the creation of two identical DNA nucleotide sequences. However, although DNA polymerases are quite precise during DNA replication, copying mistakes are estimated to occur every 10<sup>7<\/sup> DNA nucleotides. Variation from the original DNA sequence is known as a mutation (Refer to Chapter 5). Briefly, mutations can result in single-nucleotide changes, as well as the insertion or deletion of nucleotides and repeated sequences. Depending on where they occur in the genome, mutations can be <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_672\">deleterious<\/a> <\/strong>(harmful). For example, mutations may occur in regions that control cell cycle regulation, which can result in cancer (see Special Topic: The Cell Cycle and Immortality of Cancer Cells). Many other types of mutations, however, are not harmful to an organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Regardless of their effect, the cell attempts to reduce the frequency of mutations that occur during DNA replication. To accomplish this, there are polymerases with proofreading capacities that can identify and correct mismatched nucleotides. These safeguards reduce the frequency of DNA mutations so that they only occur every 10<sup>9<\/sup> nucleotides.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitotic Cell Division<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There are two types of cells in the body: <strong>germ cells <\/strong>(sperm and egg) and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_676\">somatic cells<\/a><\/strong>. The body and its various tissues comprises somatic cells. Organisms that contain two sets of chromosomes in their somatic cells are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_678\">diploid<\/a><\/strong> organisms. Humans have 46 chromosomes and they are diploid because they inherit one set of chromosomes (<em>n <\/em>= 23) from each parent. As a result, they have 23 matching pairs of chromosomes, which are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_680\">homologous chromosomes<\/a><\/strong>. As seen in Figure 4.13, homologous chromosome pairs vary in size and are generally numbered from largest (chromosome 1) to smallest (chromosome 22) with the exception of the 23rd pair, which is made up of the sex chromosomes (X and Y). Typically, the female sex is XX and the male sex is XY. Individuals inherit an X chromosome from their chromosomal mother and an X or Y from their chromosomal father.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_81\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-81\" style=\"width: 468px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"wp-image-81\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/Karyotype.jpg\" alt=\"Karyotype showing pairs of chromosomes organized by size into 23 pairs.\" width=\"468\" height=\"263\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-81\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.13: The 23 human chromosome pairs. Credit: Genome (2019) by NIH National Human Genome Research Institute is in the public domain.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To grow and repair tissues, somatic cells must divide. As discussed previously, for cell division to occur, a cell must first replicate its genetic material. During DNA replication, each chromosome produces double the amount of genetic information. The duplicated arms of chromosomes are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_682\">sister chromatids<\/a>,<\/strong> and they are attached at the centromeric region. To elaborate, the number of chromosomes stays the same (<em>n<\/em> = 46); however, the amount of genetic material is doubled in the cell as the result of replication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_684\">Mitosis<\/a><\/strong> is the process of somatic cell division that gives rise to two diploid daughter cells (Figure 4.14). Once DNA and other organelles in the cell have finished replication, mitotic spindle fibers physically align each chromosome at the center of the cell. Next, the spindle fibers divide the sister chromatids and move each one to opposite sides of the cell. At this phase, there are 46 chromosomes on each side of a human cell. The cell can now divide into two fully separated daughter cells.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_88\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-88\" style=\"width: 569px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-82\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/mitosismeiosisNEW.jpg\" alt=\"The stages of mitosis and meiosis.\" width=\"569\" height=\"521\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-88\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.14: The steps of mitotic cell division and meiotic cell division. Credit: Mitosis and meiosis original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Katie Nelson is a collective work under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License. [Includes Mitosis (Figure 3.20) and Meiosis (Figure 3.21) by Mary Nelson; CC BY-NC 4.0 License.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Meiotic Cell Division<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gametogenesis is the production of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_686\">gametes<\/a><\/strong> (sperm and egg cells); it involves two rounds of cell division called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_688\">meiosis<\/a><\/strong>. Similar to mitosis, the parent cell in meiosis is diploid. However, meiosis has a few key differences, including the number of daughter cells produced (four cells, which require two rounds of cell division to produce) and the number of chromosomes each daughter cell has (see Figure 4.14).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">During the first round of division (known as meiosis I), each chromosome (<em>n<\/em> = 46) replicates its DNA so that sister chromatids are formed. Next, with the help of spindle fibers, homologous chromosomes align near the center of the cell and sister chromatids physically swap genetic material. In other words, the sister chromatids of matching chromosomes cross over with each other at matching DNA nucleotide positions. The occurrence of homologous chromosomes crossing over, swapping DNA, and then rejoining segments is called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_690\">genetic recombination<\/a><\/strong>. The \u201cgenetic shuffling\u201d that occurs in gametes increases organismal genetic diversity by creating new combinations of genes on chromosomes that are different from the parent cell. Genetic mutations can also arise during recombination. For example, there may be an unequal swapping of genetic material that occurs between the two sister chromatids, which can result in deletions or duplications of DNA nucleotides. Once genetic recombination is complete, homologous chromosomes are separated and two daughter cells are formed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The daughter cells after the first round of meiosis are <strong>haploid<\/strong>, meaning they only have one set of chromosomes (<em>n <\/em>= 23). During the second round of cell division (known as meiosis II), sister chromatids are separated and two additional haploid daughter cells are formed. Therefore, the four resulting daughter cells have one set of chromosomes (<em>n<\/em> = 23), and they also have a genetic composition that is not identical to the parent cells nor to each other.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although both sperm and egg gamete production undergo meiosis, they differ in the final number of viable daughter cells. In the case of spermatogenesis, four mature sperm cells are produced. Although four egg cells are also produced in oogenesis, only one of these egg cells will result in an ovum (mature egg). During fertilization, an egg cell and sperm cell fuse, which creates a diploid cell that develops into an embryo. The ovum also provides the cellular organelles necessary for embryonic cell division. This includes mitochondria, which is why humans, and most other multicellular eukaryotes, have the same mtDNA sequence as their mothers.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosomal Disorders: Aneuploidies<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">During mitosis or meiosis, entire deletions or duplications of chromosomes can occur due to error. For example, homologous chromosomes may fail to separate properly, so one daughter cell may end up with an extra chromosome while the other daughter cell has one less. Cells with an unexpected (or abnormal) number of chromosomes are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_694\">aneuploid<\/a><\/strong>. Adult or embryonic cells can be tested for chromosome number (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_696\">karyotyping<\/a><\/strong>). Aneuploid cells are typically detrimental to a dividing cell or developing embryo, which can lead to a loss of pregnancy. However, the occurrence of individuals being born with three copies of the 21st chromosome is relatively common; this genetic condition is known as Down Syndrome. Moreover, individuals can also be born with aneuploid sex chromosome conditions such as XXY, XXX, and XO (referring to only one X chromosome).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: The Cell Cycle and Immortality of Cancer Cells<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">DNA replication is part of a series of preparatory phases that a cell undergoes prior to cell division, collectively known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_698\">interphase<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.15). During interphase, the cell not only doubles its chromosomes through DNA replication, but it also increases its metabolic capacity to provide energy for growth and division. Transition into each phase of the cell cycle is tightly controlled by proteins that serve as checkpoints. If a cell fails to pass a checkpoint, then DNA replication and\/or cell division will not continue. Some of the reasons why a cell may fail at a checkpoint is DNA damage, lack of nutrients to continue the process, or insufficient size. In turn, a cell may undergo <strong>apoptosis<\/strong>, which is a mechanism for cell death.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 617px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11.png\" alt=\"The cell cycle is mostly cell growth and DNA synthesis (interphase), followed by the mitotic phase (mitosis and cytokinesis).\" width=\"617\" height=\"433\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.15: The phases and checkpoints of the cell cycle. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/jVCgr5SL@15.43:SeU_rWbd@14\/10-2-The-Cell-Cycle\">Cell cycle (Biology 2e, Figure 10.5)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unchecked cellular growth is a distinguishing hallmark of cancer. In other words, as cancer cells grow and proliferate, they acquire the capacity to avoid death and replicate indefinitely. This uncontrolled and continuous cell division is also known as \u201cimmortality.\u201d As previously mentioned, most cells lose the ability to divide due to shortening of telomeres on the ends of chromosomes over time. One way in which cancer cells retain replicative immortality is that the length of their telomeres is continuously protected. Chemotherapy, often used to treat cancer, targets the cell cycle (especially cell division) to halt the propagation of genetically abnormal cells. Another therapeutic approach that continues to be investigated is targeting telomere activity to stop the division of cancer cells.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 296px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-1.png\" alt=\"Microscope image of irregularly shaped cells with bright nuclei.\" width=\"296\" height=\"223\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.16: A microscopic slide of HeLa cancer cells. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:HeLa-III.jpg\">HeLa-III<\/a> by National Institutes of Health (NIH) is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Researchers have exploited the immortality of cancer cells for molecular research. The oldest immortal cell line is HeLa cells (Figure 4.16), which were harvested from Henrietta Lacks, an African American woman diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1955. At that time, extracted cells frequently died during experiments, but surprisingly HeLa cells continued to replicate. Propagation of Lacks\u2019s cell line has significantly contributed to medical research, including contributing to ongoing cancer research and helping to test the polio vaccine in the 1950s. However, Lacks had not given her consent for her tumor biopsy to be used in cell culture research. Moreover, her family was unaware of the extraction and remarkable application of her cells for two decades. The history of HeLa cell origin was first revealed in 1976. The controversy voiced by the Lacks family was included in an extensive account of HeLa cells published in Rebecca Skloot\u2019s 2010 book, <em>The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks<\/em>. A film based on the book was also released in 2017 (Wolfe 2017).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Protein Synthesis<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">At the beginning of the chapter, we defined <em>proteins<\/em> as strings of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_702\">amino acids<\/a><\/strong> that fold into complex 3-D shapes. There are 20 standard amino acids that can be strung together in different combinations in humans, and the result is that proteins can perform an impressive amount of different functions. For instance, muscle fibers are proteins that help facilitate movement. A special class of proteins (immunoglobulins) help protect the organism by detecting disease-causing pathogens in the body. Protein hormones, such as insulin, help regulate physiological activity. Blood hemoglobin is a protein that transports oxygen throughout the body. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_704\">Enzymes<\/a> <\/strong>are also proteins, and they are catalysts for biochemical reactions that occur in the cell (e.g., metabolism). Larger-scale protein structures can be visibly seen as physical features of an organism (e.g., hair and nails).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription and Translation <\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 272px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13.jpg\" alt=\"From DNA, transcription creates pre-mRNA, is processed to mature mRNA, translated to an amino acid chain (protein)\" width=\"272\" height=\"336\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.17: The major steps of protein synthesis. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: Protein synthesis original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Nucleotides in our DNA provide the coding instructions on how to make proteins. Making proteins, also known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_706\">protein synthesis<\/a><\/strong>, can be broken down into two main steps referred to as <strong>transcription<\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_710\">translation<\/a><\/strong>. The purpose of transcription, the first step, is to make an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_712\">ribonucleic acid (RNA)<\/a><\/strong> copy of our genetic code. Although there are many different types of RNA molecules that have a variety of functions within the cell, we will mainly focus on <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_714\">messenger RNA (mRNA)<\/a><\/strong>.\u00a0Transcription concludes with the processing (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_716\">splicing<\/a><\/strong>) of the mRNA. The second step, translation, uses mRNA as the instructions for chaining together amino acids into a new protein molecule (Figure 4.17).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 340px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14.jpg\" alt=\"Single stranded RNA is composed of 4 types of nucleobases: cytosine, guanine, adenine, and uracil.\" width=\"340\" height=\"461\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.18: Structural components that form ribonucleic acid (RNA). <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Difference_DNA_RNA-EN.svg\">Difference DNA RNA-EN<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a> (translation by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Sponk\">Sponk<\/a>, cropped by Katie Nelson) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Unlike double-stranded DNA, RNA molecules are single-stranded nucleotide sequences (Figure 4.18). Additionally, while DNA contains the nucleotide thymine (T), RNA does not\u2014instead its fourth nucleotide is uracil (U). Uracil is complementary to (or can pair with) adenine (A), while cytosine (C) and guanine (G) continue to be complementary to each other.<\/p>\n<p>For transcription to proceed, a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_718\">gene<\/a><\/strong> must first be turned \u201con\u201d by the cell. A gene is a segment of DNA that codes for RNA, and genes can vary in length from a few hundred to as many as two million base pairs in length. The double-stranded DNA is then separated, and one side of the DNA is used as a coding template that is read by <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_720\">RNA polymerase<\/a>.<\/strong> Next, complementary free-floating RNA nucleotides are linked together (Figure 4.19) to form a single-stranded mRNA. For example, if a DNA template is TACGGATGC, then the newly constructed mRNA sequence will be AUGCCUACG.<\/p>\n<p>Genes contain segments called <strong>introns <\/strong>and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_724\">exons<\/a><\/strong>. Exons are considered \u201ccoding\u201d while introns are considered \u201cnoncoding\u201d\u2014meaning the information they contain will not be needed to construct proteins. When a gene is first transcribed into pre-mRNA, introns and exons are both included (Figure 4.20). However, once transcription is finished, introns are removed in a process called splicing. During splicing, a protein\/RNA complex attaches itself to the pre-mRNA. Next, introns are removed and the remaining exons are connected, thus creating a shorter mature mRNA that serves as a template for building proteins.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 1846px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15.jpg\" alt=\"DNA strands pulled apart making space for RNA polymerase to form mRNA using 1 DNA template strand.\" width=\"1846\" height=\"473\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.19: RNA polymerase catalyzing DNA transcription. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/glossary\/index.cfm?id=197\">Transcription (2019)<\/a>\u00a0by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> has been modified (cropped and labels changed by Katie Nelson) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_88-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-88-2\" style=\"width: 1900px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-88 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/4.20.jpg\" alt=\"Pre mRNA contains transcriptions of exons and introns. Mature mRNA only contains spliced exon mRNA.\" width=\"1900\" height=\"700\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-88-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.20: RNA processing is the modification of RNA, including the removal of introns, called splicing, between transcription and translation. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Protein synthesis (Figure 3.23)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As described above, the result of transcription is a single-stranded mRNA copy of a gene<strong>. <\/strong>Translation is the process by which amino acids are chained together to form a new protein. During translation, the mature mRNA is transported outside of the nucleus, where it is bound to a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_726\">ribosome<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 4.21). The nucleotides in the mRNA are read in triplets, which are called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_728\">codons<\/a><\/strong>. Each mRNA codon corresponds to an amino acid, which is carried to the ribosome by a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_730\">transfer RNA<\/a> <\/strong>(tRNA). Thus, tRNAs is the link between the mRNA molecule and the growing amino acid chain.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 651px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17.jpg\" alt=\"Ribosome and tRNA read mRNA and help join amino acids to a growing polypeptide chain.\" width=\"651\" height=\"366\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.21: Translation of mRNA into a polypeptide chain composed of the twenty different types of amino acids. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/Amino-Acids?id=5\">Amino Acids<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuing with our mRNA sequence example from above, the mRNA sequence AUG-CCU-ACG codes for three amino acids. Using a codon table (Figure 4.22), AUG is a codon for methionine (Met), CCU is proline (Pro), and ACG is threonine (Thr). Therefore, the protein sequence is Met-Pro-Thr. Methionine is the most common \u201cstart codon\u201d (AUG) for the initiation of protein translation in eukaryotes. As the ribosome moves along the mRNA, the growing amino acid chain exits the ribosome and folds into a protein. When the ribosome reaches a \u201cstop\u201d codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA), the ribosome stops adding any new amino acids, detaches from the mRNA, and the protein is released. Depending upon the amino acid sequence, a linear protein may undergo additional \u201cfolding.\u201d The final three-dimensional protein shape is integral to completing a specific structural or functional task.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: Protein Synthesis<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To see protein synthesis in animation, please check out the\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yourgenome.org\/video\/from-dna-to-protein\/\">From DNA to Protein<\/a> video on YourGenome.org.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure style=\"width: 550px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-1.png\" alt=\"A circle labeled with letters for mRNA nucleotides.\" width=\"550\" height=\"541\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.22: This table can be used to identify which mRNA codons (sequence of three nucleotides) correspond with each of the 20 different amino acids. For each mRNA codon, you work in the 5\u2019 to 3\u2019 direction (inside the circle to outside). For example, if the mRNA codon is CAU, you look at the inner circle for the \u201cC,\u201d the middle circle for \u201cA,\u201d and outside circle for \u201cU,\u201d indicating that the CAU codon corresponds with the amino acid \u201chistidine\u201d (abbreviated \u201cHis\u201d or \u201cH\u201d). The table also indicates that the \u201cstart codon\u201d (AUG) correlates with Methionine, and the three \u201cstop\u201d codons are UAA, UAG, and UGA. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1AKB8mx6Ih-V-1DJ_zxTbf9Jn4puHRCPEhG1rGOlojNc\/edit?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">An accessible full text RNA codon to amino acid table is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Aminoacids_table.svg\">Aminoacids table<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Mouagip\">Mouagip<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Mendelian Genetics<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 183px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19.png\" alt=\"Stone statue of a robed monk.\" width=\"183\" height=\"239\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.23: Statue of Mendel located at the Mendel Museum, located at Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic. Credit: \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mendel%C2%B4s_statue.JPG\">Mendel\u00b4s statue<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Coeli\">Coeli<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Gregor Johann Mendel (1822\u20131884) is often described as the \u201cFather of Genetics.\u201d Mendel was a monk who conducted pea plant breeding experiments in a monastery located in the present-day Czech Republic (Figure 4.23). After several years of experiments, Mendel presented his work to a local scientific community in 1865 and published his findings the following year. Although his meticulous effort was notable, the importance of his work was not recognized for another 35 years. One reason for this delay in recognition is that his findings did not agree with the predominant scientific viewpoints on inheritance at the time. For example, it was believed that parental physical traits \u201cblended\u201d together and offspring inherited an intermediate form of that trait. In contrast, Mendel showed that certain pea plant physical traits (e.g., flower color) were passed down separately to the next generation in a statistically predictable manner. Mendel also observed that some parental traits disappeared in offspring but then reappeared in later generations. He explained this occurrence by introducing the concept of \u201cdominant\u201d and \u201crecessive\u201d traits. Mendel established a few fundamental laws of inheritance, and this section reviews some of these concepts. Moreover, the study of traits and diseases that are controlled by a single gene is commonly referred to as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_732\">Mendelian genetics<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 738px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20.png\" alt=\"Pea plant variation: round\/wrinkled, yellow\/ green pods, white\/purple flowers, tall\/short stem.\" width=\"738\" height=\"304\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.24: Various phenotypic characteristics of pea plants resulting from different genotypes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mendels_peas.png\">Mendels peas<\/a> by Mariana Ruiz <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:LadyofHats\">LadyofHats<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0 1.0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The physical appearance of a trait is called an organism\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_734\">phenotype<\/a><\/strong>. Figure 4.24 shows pea plant (<em>Pisum sativum<\/em>) phenotypes that were studied by Mendel, and in each of these cases the physical traits are controlled by a single gene. In the case of Mendelian genetics, a phenotype is determined by an organism\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_736\">genotype<\/a><\/strong>. A genotype consists of two gene copies, wherein one copy was inherited from each parent. Gene copies are also known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_738\">alleles<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 4.25), which means they are found in the same gene location on homologous chromosomes. Alleles have a nonidentical DNA sequence, which means their phenotypic effect can be different. In other words, although alleles code for the same trait, different phenotypes can be produced depending on which two alleles (i.e., genotypes) an organism possesses. For example, Mendel\u2019s pea plants all have flowers, but their flower color can be purple or white. Flower color is therefore dependent upon which two color alleles are present in a genotype.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 771px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21.jpeg\" alt=\"Four pairs of chromosomes. Each chromosome is labeled with an allele, either capital B or lowercase b.\" width=\"771\" height=\"315\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.25: Homozygous refers to having the same alleles (e.g. two capital Bs or two lowercase bs). Heterozygous refers to having two different alleles (e.g. one capital B and one lowercase b). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/genetics-glossary\/homozygous\">Homozygous<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\"> NIH National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a> is in the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/about-nhgri\/Policies-Guidance\/Copyright\"> public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A Punnett square is a diagram that can help visualize Mendelian inheritance patterns. For instance, when parents of known genotypes mate, a Punnett square can help predict the ratio of Mendelian genotypes and phenotypes that their offspring would possess. When discussing genotype, biologists use upper and lower case letters to denote the different allele copies. Figure 4.26 is a Punnett square that includes two <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_740\">heterozygous<\/a><\/strong> parents for flower color (Bb). A heterozygous genotype means there are two different alleles for the same gene. Therefore, a pea plant that is heterozygous for flower color has one purple allele and one white allele. When an organism is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_742\">homozygous<\/a><\/strong> for a specific trait, it means their genotype consists of two copies of the same allele. Using the Punnett square example, the two heterozygous pea plant parents can produce offspring with two different homozygous genotypes (BB or bb) or offspring that are heterozygous (Bb).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 220px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22.png\" alt=\"Pollen and Pistol (each with one capital B and one lower case b allele) merge in different combinations.\" width=\"220\" height=\"220\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.26: Punnett square depicting the possible genetic combinations of offspring from two heterozygous parents. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Punnett_square_mendel_flowers.svg\">Punnett square mendel flowers<\/a> by Madeleine Price Ball (<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Madprime\">Madprime<\/a>) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A pea plant with purple flowers could be heterozygous (Bb) or homozygous (BB). This is because the purple color allele (B) is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_744\">dominant<\/a> <\/strong>to the white color allele (b), and therefore it only needs one copy of that allele to phenotypically express purple flowers. Because the white flower allele is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_746\">recessive<\/a><\/strong>, a pea plant must be homozygous for the recessive allele in order to have a white color phenotype (bb). As seen by the Punnett square example (Figure 4.26), three of four offspring will have purple flowers and the other one will have white flowers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Law of Segregation was introduced by Mendel to explain why we can predict the ratio of genotypes and phenotypes in offspring. As discussed previously, a parent will have two alleles for a certain gene (with each copy on a different homologous chromosome). The Law of Segregation states that the two copies will be segregated from each other and will each be distributed to their own gamete. We now know that the process where that occurs is meiosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Offspring are the products of two gametes combining, which means the offspring inherits one allele from each gamete for most genes. When multiple offspring are produced (like with pea plant breeding), the predicted phenotype ratios are more clearly observed. The pea plants Mendel studied provide a simplistic model to understand single-gene genetics. While many traits anthropologists are interested in have a more complicated inheritance (e.g., are informed by many genes), there are a few known Mendelian traits in humans. Additionally, some human diseases also follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance (Figure 4.27). Because humans do not have as many offspring as other organisms, we may not recognize Mendelian patterns as easily. However, understanding these principles and being able to calculate the probability that an offspring will have a Mendelian phenotype is still important.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div align=\"left\">\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" style=\"width: 422px;height: 420px\">\n<caption>Figure 4.27: Examples of human diseases with their gene names that follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\"><strong>Mendelian disorder<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\"><strong>Gene\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Alpha Thalassemia<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">HBA1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Cystic Fibrosis<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">CFTR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Fragile X Syndrome<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">FMR1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">G6PD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Hemophilia A<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">F8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Huntington disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">HTT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Mitochondrial DNA Depletion Syndrome<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">TYMP<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Oculocutaneous Albinism: Type 1<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">TYR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Polycystic Kidney Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">PKHD1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Sickle-cell anemia<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">HBB<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Spinal Muscular Atrophy: SMN1 Linked<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">SMN1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Tay-Sachs Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">HEXA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px\">\n<td style=\"width: 432.598px;height: 30px\">Wilson Disease<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 89.9414px;height: 30px\">ATP7B<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Example of Mendelian Inheritance: The ABO Blood Group System<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1901, Karl Landsteiner at the University of Vienna published his discovery of ABO blood groups. While conducting blood immunology experiments in which he combined the blood of individuals who possess different blood cell types, he observed an agglutination (clotting) reaction. The presence of agglutination implies there is an incompatible immunological reaction; no agglutination will occur in individuals with the same blood type. This work was clearly important because it resulted in a higher survival rate of patients who received blood transfusions. Blood transfusions from someone with a different type of blood causes agglutinations, and the resulting coagulated blood can not easily pass through blood vessels, resulting in death. Landsteiner received the Nobel Prize (1930) for his discovery and explaination of the ABO blood group system.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blood <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_748\">cell surface antigens<\/a><\/strong> are proteins that coat the surface of red blood cells, and<strong> antibodies <\/strong>are specifically \u201cagainst\u201d or \u201canti\u201d to the antigens from other blood types. Thus, antibodies are responsible for causing agglutination between incompatible blood types. Understanding the interaction of antigens and antibodies helps to determine ABO compatibility amongst blood donors and recipients. Individuals that are blood type A have A antigens on the red blood cell surface, and anti-B antibodies, which will bind to B antigens should they come in contact. Alternatively, individuals with blood type B have B antigens and anti-A antibodies. Individuals with blood type AB have both A and B antigens but do not produce antibodies for the ABO system. This does not mean type AB does not have any antibodies present, just that specifically anti-A and anti-B antibodies are not produced. Individuals who are blood type O have nonspecific antigens and produce both anti-A and anti-B antibodies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Figure 4.28 shows a table of the ABO allele system, which has a Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Both the A and B alleles function as dominant alleles, so the A allele always codes for the A antigen, and the B allele codes for the B antigen. The O allele differs from A and B, because it codes for a nonfunctional antigen protein, which means there is no antigen present on the cell surface of O blood cells. To have blood type O, two copies of the O allele must be inherited, one from each parent, thus the O allele is considered recessive. Therefore, someone who is a heterozygous AO genotype is phenotypically blood type A, and a genotype of BO is blood type B. The ABO blood system also provides an example of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_752\">codominance<\/a><\/strong>, which is when both alleles are observed in the phenotype. This is true for blood type AB: when an individual inherits both the A and B alleles, then both A and B antigens will be present on the cell surface.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 425px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24.jpg\" alt=\"A table showing the genotypes that can occur from combinations of A, B, and O alleles.\" width=\"425\" height=\"177\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.28: The different combinations of ABO blood alleles (A, B, and O) to form ABO blood genotypes. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">ABO Blood Genotypes (Figure 3.33)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Also found on the surface of red blood cells is the rhesus group antigen, known as \u201cRh factor.\u201d In reality, there are several antigens on red blood cells independent from the ABO blood system, however, the Rh factor is the second most important antigen to consider when determining blood donor and recipient compatibility. Rh antigens must also be considered when a pregnant mother and her baby have incompatible Rh factors. In such cases, a doctor can administer necessary treatment steps to prevent pregnancy complications and hemolytic disease, which is when the mother\u2019s antibodies break down the newborn\u2019s red blood cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An individual can possess the Rh antigen (be Rh positive) or lack the Rh antigen (be Rh negative). The Rh factor is controlled by a single gene and is inherited independently of the ABO alleles. Therefore, all blood types can either be positive (O+, A+, B+, AB+) or negative (O-, A-, B-, AB-).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Individuals with O+ red blood cells can donate blood to A+, B+, AB+, and O+ blood type recipients. Because O- individuals do not have AB or Rh antigens, they are compatible with all blood cell types and are referred to as \u201cuniversal donors.\u201d Individuals that are AB+ are considered to be \u201cuniversal recipients\u201d because they do not possess antibodies against other blood types.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mendelian Patterns of Inheritance and Pedigrees<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <strong>pedigree<\/strong> can be used to investigate a family\u2019s medical history by determining if a health issue is inheritable and will possibly require medical intervention. A pedigree can also help determine if it is a Mendelian recessive or dominant genetic condition. Figure 4.29 is a pedigree example of a family with Huntington\u2019s disease, which has a Mendelian dominant pattern of inheritance. In a standard pedigree, males are represented by a square and females are represented by a circle. Biological family members are connected to a horizontal line, with biological parents above and offspring below. When an individual is affected with a certain condition, the square or circle is filled in as a solid color. With a dominant condition, at least one of the parents will have the disease and an offspring will have a 50% chance of inheriting the affected chromosome. Therefore, dominant genetic conditions tend to be present in every generation. In the case of Huntington\u2019s, some individuals may not be diagnosed until later in adulthood, so parents may unknowingly pass this dominantly inherited disease to their children.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 389px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25.png\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with about half the individuals shaded in. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"389\" height=\"189\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.29: A pedigree depicting an example of dominant Mendelian inheritance like Huntington\u2019s. Offspring with the trait will have at least one parent with the same trait. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Mendelian dominant pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.34)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Because the probability of inheriting a disease-causing recessive allele is more rare, recessive medical conditions can skip generations. Figure 4.30 is an example of a family that carries a recessive cystic fibrosis mutation. A parent that is heterozygous for the cystic fibrosis allele has a 50% chance of passing down their affected chromosome to the next generation. If a child has a recessive disease, then it means both of their parents are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_756\">carriers<\/a><\/strong> (heterozygous) for that condition. In most cases, carriers for recessive conditions show no serious medical symptoms. Individuals whose family have a known medical history for certain conditions sometimes seek family planning services (see the Genetic Testing section).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<figure style=\"width: 392px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26.png\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with three individuals with the trait shaded in. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"392\" height=\"215\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.30: A pedigree depicting an example of recessive Mendelian inheritance like cystic fibrosis. Individuals may have a trait not observed in the previous generation. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">Mendelian recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.35)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pedigrees can also help distinguish if a health issue has either an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_758\">autosomal<\/a> <\/strong>or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_760\">X-linked<\/a><\/strong> pattern of inheritance. As previously discussed, there are 23 pairs of chromosomes and 22 of these pairs are known as autosomes. The provided pedigree examples (Figure 4.29-30) are autosomally linked genetic diseases. This means the genes that cause the disease are on one of the chromosomes numbered 1 to 22. The conditions caused by genes located on the X chromosome are referred to as X-linked diseases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Figure 4.31 depicts a family in which the mother is a carrier for the X-linked recessive disease Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). The mother is a carrier for DMD, so daughters and sons will have a 50% chance of inheriting the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_762\">pathogenic<\/a><\/strong> <em>DMD<\/em> allele. Because females have two X chromosomes, females who inherit only one copy will not have the disease (although in rare cases, female carriers may show some symptoms of the disease). On the other hand, males who inherit a copy of an X-linked pathogenic <em>DMD<\/em> allele will typically be affected with the condition. Thus, males are more susceptible to X-linked conditions because they only have one X chromosome. Therefore, when evaluating a pedigree, if a higher proportion of males are affected with the disease, this could suggest the disease is X-linked recessive. <br style=\"clear: both\" \/><br style=\"clear: both\" \/>Compared to the X chromosome, the Y chromosome is smaller with only a few genes. Y-linked traits are therefore rare and can only be passed from a chromosomal father to a biological XY child.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 407px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27.jpg\" alt=\"A three-generation pedigree with four males and one female with the trait. Please see text discussion for details.\" width=\"407\" height=\"236\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.31: A pedigree depicting an example of X-linked Mendelian inheritance like Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.36)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Other Patterns of Inheritance<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Complexity Surrounding Mendelian Inheritance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pea plant trait genetics are relatively simple compared to what we know about genetic inheritance today. The vast majority of genetically controlled traits are not strictly dominant or recessive, so the relationship among alleles and predicting phenotype is often more complicated. For example, traits that exhibit<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_764\">incomplete dominance<\/a><\/strong> occur when a heterozygote exhibits a phenotype that is an intermediate phenotype of both alleles. In snapdragon flowers, the red flower color (R) is dominant and white is recessive (r). Therefore, the homozygous dominant RR is red and homozygous recessive rr is white. However, because the R allele is not completely dominant, the heterozygote Rr is a blend of red and white, which results in a pink flower (Figure 4.32).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 302px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28.png\" alt=\"Snapdragon flowers in many hues.\" width=\"302\" height=\"188\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.32: Snap dragons with different genotypes resulting in different flower color phenotypes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Antirrhinum_aka_Snap_dragon_at_lalbagh_7112.JPG\">Antirrhinum a.k.a. Snap dragon at lalbagh 7112<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Rameshng\">Rameshng<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An example of incomplete dominance in humans is the enzyme \u03b2-hexosaminidase A (Hex A), which is encoded by the gene <em>HEXA<\/em>. Patients with two dysfunctional <em>HEXA <\/em>alleles are unable to metabolize a specific lipid-sugar molecule (GM2 ganglioside); because of this, the molecule builds up and causes damage to nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. This condition is known as Tay-Sachs disease, and it usually appears in infants who are three to six months old. Most children with Tay-Sachs do not live past early childhood. Individuals who are heterozygous for the functional type <em>HEXA<\/em> allele and one dysfunctional allele have reduced Hex A activity. However, the amount of enzyme activity is still sufficient, so carriers do not exhibit any neurological phenotypes and appear healthy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some genes and alleles can also have higher <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_766\">penetrance<\/a><\/strong> than others. Penetrance can be defined as the proportion of individuals who have a certain allele and also express an expected phenotype. If a genotype always produces an expected phenotype, then those alleles are said to be fully penetrant. However, in the case of incomplete (or reduced) penetrance, an expected phenotype may not occur even if an individual possesses the alleles that are known to control a trait or cause a disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A well-studied example of genetic penetrance is the cancer-related genes <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em>. Mutations in these genes can affect crucial processes such as DNA repair, which can lead to breast and ovarian cancers. Although <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em> mutations have an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, it does not mean an individual will develop cancer if they inherit a pathogenic allele. Several lifestyle and environmental factors can also influence the risk for developing cancer. Regardless, if a family has a history of certain types of cancers, then it is often recommended that genetic testing be performed for individuals who are at risk. Moreover, publically available genetic testing companies are now offering health reports that include <em>BRCA1<\/em> and <em>BRCA2<\/em> allele testing (see the Genetic Testing section).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygenic Traits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Mendelian traits tend to be influenced by a single gene, the vast majority of human phenotypes are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_768\">polygenic traits<\/a><\/strong>. The term <em>polygenic<\/em> means \u201cmany genes.\u201d Therefore, a polygenic trait is influenced by many genes that work together to produce the phenotype. Human phenotypes such as hair color, eye color, height, and weight are examples of polygenic traits. Hair color, for example, is largely determined by the type and quantity of a pigment called melanin, which is produced by a specialized cell type within the skin called melanocytes. The quantity and ratio of melanin pigments determine black, brown, blond, and red hair colors. <em>MC1R<\/em> is a well-studied gene that encodes a protein expressed on the surface of melanocytes that is involved in the production of eumelanin pigment. Typically, people with two functional copies of <em>MC1R <\/em>have brown hair. People with reduced functioning <em>MC1R<\/em> allele copies tend to produce pheomelanin, which results in blond or red hair. However, <em>MC1R <\/em>alleles have variable penetrance, and studies are continually identifying new genes (e.g., <em>TYR<\/em>, <em>TYRP1<\/em>, <em>SLC24A5<\/em>, and <em>KITLG<\/em>) that also influence hair color. Individuals with two nonfunctioning copies of the gene <em>TYR<\/em> have a condition called oculocutaneous albinism\u2014their melanocytes are unable to produce melanin so these individuals have white hair, light eyes, and pale skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In comparison to Mendelian diseases, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_770\">complex diseases<\/a><\/strong> (e.g., Type II diabetes, coronary heart disease, Alzheimer's, and schizophrenia) are more prevalent in humans. Complex diseases are polygenic, but their development is also influenced by physical, environmental, sociocultural, and individual lifestyle factors. Families can be more predisposed to certain diseases; however, complex diseases often do not have a clear pattern of inheritance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Although research of complex traits and diseases continue, geneticists may not know all of the genes involved with a given complex disease. Additionally, how much genetic versus nongenetic determinants contribute to a disease phenotype can be difficult to decipher. Therefore, predicting individual medical risk and risk across different human populations is often a significant challenge. For instance, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be one of the leading causes of death around the world. Development of CVDs has been linked to nutrient exposure during fetal development, high fat and sedentary lifestyles, drug usage, adverse socioeconomic conditions, and various genes. Human environments are diverse, and public health research including the field of Human Biology can help identify risk factors and behaviors associated with chronic diseases. Large-scale clinical genetic studies with powerful bioinformatic approaches can also help elucidate some of these complex relationships.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Genomics and Epigenetics<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_772\">genome<\/a><\/strong> is all of the genetic material of an organism. In the case of humans, this includes 46 chromosomes and mtDNA. The human genome contains approximately three billion base pairs of DNA and has regions that are both noncoding and coding. Scientists now estimate that the human genome contains 20,000\u201325,000 protein-coding genes, with each chromosome containing a few hundred to a few thousand genes. As our knowledge of heredity increases, researchers have begun to realize the importance of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_774\">epigenetics<\/a><\/strong>, or changes in gene expression that do not result in a change of the underlying DNA sequence. Epigenetics research is also crucial for unraveling gene regulation, which involves complex interactions between DNA, RNA, proteins, and the environment.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genomics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The vast majority of the human genome is noncoding, meaning there are no instructions to make a protein or RNA product in these regions. Historically, noncoding DNA was referred to as \u201cjunk DNA\u201d because these vast segments of the genome were thought to be irrelevant and nonfunctional. However, continual improvement of DNA <strong>sequencing<\/strong> technology along with worldwide scientific collaborations and consortia have contributed to our increased understanding of how the genome functions. Through these technological advances and collaborations, we have since discovered that many of these noncoding DNA regions are involved in dynamic genetic regulatory processes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genomics is a diverse field of molecular biology that focuses on genomic evolution, structure, and function; gene mapping; and <strong>genotyping <\/strong>(determining the alleles present). Evolutionary genomics determined that humans share about 98.8% percent of their DNA with chimpanzees. Given the phenotypic differences between humans and chimpanzees, having a DNA sequence difference of 1.2% seems surprising. However, a lot of genomics research is also focused on understanding how noncoding genomic regions influence how individual genes are turned \u201con\u201d and \u201coff\u201d (i.e., regulated). Therefore, although DNA sequences are identical, regulatory differences in noncoding genetic regions (e.g., promoters) are believed to be largely responsible for the physical differences between humans and chimpanzees.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Further understanding of genomic regulatory elements can lead to new therapies and personalized treatments for a broad range of diseases. For example, targeting the regulatory region of a pathogenic gene to \u201cturn off\u201d its expression can prevent its otherwise harmful effects. Such molecular targeting approaches can be personalized based on an individual\u2019s genetic makeup. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which seek to determine genes that are linked to complex traits and diseases, typically require significant computational efforts. This is because millions of DNA sequences must be analyzed and GWAS sometimes include thousands of participants. During the beginning of the genomics field, most of the large-scale genomics studies only included North American, European, and East Asian participants and patients. Researchers are now focusing on increasing ethnic diversity in genomic studies and databases. In turn, accuracy of individual disease risk across all human populations will be improved and more rare disease\u2013causing alleles will be identified.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">All cells within your body have the same copy of DNA. For example, a brain neuron has the same DNA blueprint as does a skin cell on your arm. Although these cells have the same genetic information, they are considered specialized. The reason all cells within the body have the same DNA but different morphologies and functions is that different subsets of genes are turned \u201con\u201d and \u201coff\u201d within the different cell types. A more precise explanation is that there is differential expression of genes among different cell types. In the case of neuronal cells, a unique subset of genes are active that allow them to grow axons to send and receive messages. This subset of genes will be inactive in non-neuronal cell types such as skin cells. Epigenetics is a branch of genetics that studies how these genes are regulated through mechanisms that do not change the underlying DNA sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The prefix <em>epi-<\/em> means \u201con, above, or near,\u201d and epigenetic mechanisms such as <strong>DNA methylation<\/strong> and histone modifications occur on, above, or near DNA. The addition of a methyl group (\u2014 CH\u2083) to DNA is known as DNA methylation (Figure 4.33). DNA methylation and other modifications made to the histones around which DNA are wrapped are thought to make chromatin more compact. This DNA is inaccessible to transcription factors and RNA polymerases, thus preventing genes from being turned on (i.e., transcribed). Other histone modifications have the opposite effect by loosening chromatin, which makes genes accessible to transcription factors.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29.png\" alt=\"Epigenetic histone tail modifications that can tighten and loosen the chromatin of DNA. \" width=\"510\" height=\"395\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.33: Different types of epigenetic histone tail modifications that can tighten (top) and loosen (bottom) the chromatin of DNA. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/jVCgr5SL@15.43:5cz8bfb2@10\/16-3-Eukaryotic-Epigenetic-Gene-Regulation\">Epigenetic Control (Biology 2e, Figure 16.7)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to note that environmental factors can alter DNA methylation and histone modifications and also that these changes can be passed from generation to generation. For example, someone\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_782\">epigenetic profile<\/a><\/strong> can be altered during a stressful time (e.g., natural disasters, famine, etc.), and those regulatory changes can be inherited by the next generation. Moreover, our epigenetic expression profile changes as we age. For example, certain places in our genome become \u201chyper\u201d or \u201chypo\u201d methylated over time. Identical twins also have epigenetic profiles that become more different as they age. Researchers are only beginning to understand the significance of these genome-wide epigenetic changes. Scientists have also discovered that changes in epigenetic modifications can alter gene expression in ways that contribute to diseases. It is also important to note that, unlike DNA mutations (which permanently change the nucleotide sequence), epigenetic changes can be easily reversed. A lot of research now focuses on how drugs can alter or modulate changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications to treat diseases such as cancer.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded no-borders\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Environmental Disruptors and Their Impact on Human Reproductive Systems<\/h2>\n<p>The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) defines endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) as synthetic or natural compounds that interfere with the body\u2019s hormonal systems. Found in pesticides, plastics, industrial chemicals, and pollutants, EDCs can mimic, block, or alter the natural action of hormones (NIEHS, 2024). Their effects on reproductive health are profound, particularly during critical developmental windows while also affecting subsequent generations through epigenetic changes.<\/p>\n<p>NIEHS declared EDC\u2019s:<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Atrazine<\/td>\n<td>one of the most commonly applied herbicides in the world, often used to control weeds in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane crops.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Bisphenol A (BPA)<\/td>\n<td>used to make polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. It is used in manufacturing, food packaging, toys, and other applications. BPA resins may be found in the lining of some canned foods and beverages.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Dioxins<\/td>\n<td>a byproduct of certain manufacturing processes, such as herbicide production and paper bleaching. They can be released into the air from waste burning and wildfires.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Perchlorate<\/td>\n<td>a colorless salt manufactured and used as an industrial chemical to make rockets, explosives, and fireworks, which can be found in some groundwater.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)<\/td>\n<td>a large group of chemicals used widely in industrial applications, such as firefighting foam, nonstick pans, paper, and textile coatings.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Phthalates<\/td>\n<td>a large group of compounds used as liquid plasticizers. They are found in hundreds of products including some food packaging, cosmetics, fragrances, children\u2019s toys, and medical device tubing. Cosmetics that may contain phthalates include nail polish, hair spray, aftershave lotion, cleanser, and shampoo.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Phytoestorgens<\/td>\n<td>naturally occurring substances with hormone-like activity found in some plants; they may have a similar effect to estrogen produced by the body. Soy foods, for example, contain phytoestrogens.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)<\/td>\n<td>used to make flame retardants for products such as furniture foam and carpet.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)<\/td>\n<td>used to make electrical equipment, such as transformers, and are in hydraulic fluids, heat transfer fluids, lubricants, and plasticizers. PCBs were mass-produced globally until they were banned in 1979.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Triclosan<\/td>\n<td>an ingredient that was previously added to some antimicrobial and personal care products, like liquid body wash and soaps.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">The Male Reproductive System: Vulnerabilities, Epigenetics, and Disruptions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">The male reproductive system is highly sensitive to hormonal interference, especially during prenatal and early postnatal development. Over the past 50 years, epidemiological data gathered by the NIEHS has revealed alarming changes: increased cases of prostate and testicular cancers, male-descended testes, and anatomical malformations of male genitalia (Sweeney Et al., 2015). These changes are accompanied by a global decline in sperm quality, underscoring the widespread vulnerability of male reproductive health to environmental factors. The testes, as the site of sperm production and testosterone synthesis, are particularly susceptible to EDC interference. Proper testicular development depends on tightly regulated hormonal signalling, which EDCs can disrupt by mimicking or blocking hormones like testosterone and estrogen, leading to improper testicular formation and increased risk of testicular cancer. Prostate development is also a target for EDC interference. African American men, for example, exhibit twice the risk of developing prostate cancer than Caucasian men. This disparity has been attributed to hereditary, lifestyle, and environmental factors, often causing elevated maternal estrogen levels during gestation. This prenatal exposure to EDCs can mimic estrogen and predispose developing prostate tissues to cancerous changes in adulthood (2015).<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">The Female Reproductive System: Epigenetics and Fertility Challenges<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Female fertility relies on a delicate hormonal balance to regulate processes such as ovulation, implantation, and pregnancy. EDCs can disrupt this balance by mimicking, antagonizing, or altering the action of hormones. Their interference contributes to a wide range of reproductive disorders, including early puberty, premature ovarian failure, anovulation, and infertility. Epigenetics plays a central role in female reproductive health. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and ncRNA generation are crucial for regulating ovarian and uterine function; However, EDCs can affect these regulatory mechanisms. An example of this is primordial germ cells (PGCs) in female embryos, which need to undergo extensive epigenetic reprogramming during development (Biswas Et al., 2021). This process erases genomic imprinting and reactivates the inactive X chromosome, creating a \"blank slate\" for the next generation; however, EDCs can disrupt this critical period of epigenetic resetting, leading to long-term consequences for reproductive health.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">The ovarian follicle\u2013the functional unit of female reproduction\u2013is particularly vulnerable to these chemicals. Being exposed to EDCs can deplete the pool of these follicles, leading to temporary or permanent infertility (2021). Additionally, EDCs interfere with estrogen receptor function, a crucial regulator of female reproductive processes. These chemicals bind to these receptors, altering the recruitment of enzymes involved in histone modification and chromatin remodelling; this disrupts gene expression patterns critical for ovarian and uterine health. One striking example is diethylstilbestrol (DES), a synthetic estrogen once prescribed to pregnant women (2021). DES exposure has been linked to ovarian cancer in subsequent generations, highlighting the transgenerational effects of EDCs on the female reproductive system. In severe cases, EDCs induce multigenerational reproductive disorders, as observed in studies linking DES to ovarian cancer in the grandchildren of exposed individuals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: left\">Epigenetic Therapy<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Heritable Changes and Some Related Drugs<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">As has been said, epigenetics involves heritable changes in gene expression, without involving DNA alteration. These changes, being heritable and often involving abnormal DNA methylation patterns within the four DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) or histone modifications in chromatin, can lead to disease development. DNMTs (DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B) have functions specific to themselves and are at the core of the DNA methylation process. Regarding the histone modifications mentioned, histones have been recognized to mutate under various mechanisms, such as acetylation, methylation and phosphorylation. The acetylation of histones involves histone acetyltransferases (HATs), which are associated with the activation of gene transcription. This process is reversed by the deacetylation of histones, which is associated with the silencing of gene transcription under histone deacetylases (HDACs). (Peedicayil, 2006)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Epigenetic therapy, with the use of specialized drug developments, aims to correct epigenetic defects, which are reversible under pharmacological intervention, by targeting enzymes such as HATs, HDACs and DNMTs, as well as histone methyltransferases. For instance, certain drugs are being developed as DNMT inhibitors, stopping the methylation of DNA associated with inappropriate transcriptional silencing of genes, and potentially increasing haemoglobin F to help patients affected by sickle cell anemia. These DNMT inhibitor drugs have been classified under three categories based on their structures: nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides (2006). Nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors are analogues of cytosine, the nucleotide affected by methylation from DNMTs, and are incorporated into replicating DNA, replacing cytosine, thus being S-phase-specific drugs. Non-nucleoside analogue DNMT inhibitors are researched to reduce the myelotoxic effects of drugs directly incorporated into the DNA, and are brought into the patient differently. Antisense oligonucleotides are drugs made up of sequences of nucleotides complementary to mRNAs, made to block translation, by acting on the DNMT1 for instance. Additionally, drugs such as HDAC inhibitors help maintain the acetylation of histones, leading to apoptosis, growth arrest or differentiation of tumour cells, giving this drug an anticancer effect, suppressing tumour growth. (2006)<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Implications with Cancers<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Research published in\u00a0<em>The Indian Journal for Medical Research<\/em> has shown that these drugs show promising results in cancer treatment trials involving solid tumours and hematological malignancies. However, they have limitations, for instance, the fact that DNMT and HDAC inhibitors could activate oncogenes due to limited specificity, leading to further tumor progression; or their high myelotoxicity levels, a side effect thought to be due to their incorporation into DNA, and nucleotide analogue inhibitors (2006). Though that is the case, it is important to know that epigenetic drugs alone or in combination with conventional anticancer drugs, may prove to be a significant advance over the use of conventional anticancer drugs, and may also be a way to prevent diseases. Additionally, combination therapy strategies targeting various epigenetic markers, such as DNMTs for cancer-related genes and non-selective HDAC inhibitors, have been shown to yield promising results, simultaneously inducing the expression of tumor suppressor genes and inhibiting the expression of key oncogenes.\u00a0<span style=\"margin: 0px;padding: 0px\">As recently explored by researchers in\u00a0<em>Cell Death Discovery<\/em>, this specific case of combination therapy would synergistically induce gene expression while maintaining the selectivity required to increase targeting of particular tumor types based on gene expression profiles.<\/span> (Yu Et al., 2024)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">To date, the majority of cases in which epigenetic defects have led to disease pathogenesis are cancers (Peedicayil, 2006), cancer cells often developing due to uncontrolled cell growth and resistance to cell death mechanisms, made possible with abnormal DNA methylation patterns as well as histone modifications (Yu Et al., 2024). Epigenetic alterations have therefore been identified within the core of tumor progression mechanisms in cancer cells, including tumorigenesis, promotion, progression, and recurrence, suggesting epigenetic heterogeneity at the cellular level (2024). Certain drugs have been developed, showing specifically good results for cancer treatments, by inhibiting enzymes such as KMTs and KDMs. These can be added to the growing list of drugs fitting into epigenetic therapy, including DNMT and HDAC inhibitors, as well as combination therapy treatments, for cancer and other diseases.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: left\">Purpose of Study and Future Developments<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Studying the link between epigenetics and diseases is crucial for multiple reasons, one of which is enabling scientists and researchers to better understand disease mechanisms, detect abnormal epigenetic changes, and, in turn, develop more effective treatments or possibly even prevent diseases from developing in the first place. As previously mentioned, epigenetic therapy has been shown to bring promising results in drug trials surrounding cancer treatments. Still, the range of diseases to be treated with this new pharmacology approach is vast, molecules other than DNMTs and HDACs being related to epigenetic mechanisms within gene expression, such as BET proteins and KDMs, potentially being a source of new medications or treatments (Yu Et al., 2024; Peedicayil, 2006). Additionally, by understanding someone's epigenetic profile, a form of personalized \u201cprecision medicine\u201d (2024, p. 8) is developed, offering less toxic and more effective treatments with fewer undesired side effects. Researchers expanding this field of knowledge would be able to understand, in more concrete terms, how external factors are linked to epigenetic changes and, consequently, disease risk, potentially halting disease progression and developing new prevention mechanisms. Personalized medicine combines both genetic and epigenetic data, including gene expression profiles, DNA methylation patterns, histone modification profiles, and identified biomarkers, to create precise disease management and prediction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">It is crucial to keep in mind that diseases like cancer are linked to major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, which could be reduced with therapeutic medicine such as epigenetic therapy, aiming to detect cancer biomarkers to improve risk assessment, diagnosis, and targeted treatment interventions, limiting the burden of chronic and life-threatening diseases. With the advancement of epigenetic therapies, new sequencing techniques, as well as AI (2024), have opened avenues to establish precision diagnostics and therapeutics for patients.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">With this said, epigenetics is a relatively new area of scientific research. This field has exploded in the last few decades, especially with the advancement of technologies that allow researchers to examine DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA molecules across the genome. While the potential of epigenetics in explaining complex diseases, including those linked to environmental factors such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), is immense, we\u2019ve identified two key challenges. One major limitation is the complexity and variability of epigenetic marks. These modifications can differ significantly across cell types, tissues, and even individuals, making it difficult to generalize findings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Additionally, epigenetic changes are dynamic and can fluctuate over time, which complicates the task of linking them to specific environmental exposures or health outcomes. Another challenge lies in the transgenerational aspect of epigenetics. While it's clear that epigenetic changes can be passed from one generation to the next, the mechanisms behind this inheritance are not fully understood. It's also difficult to pinpoint exactly when and how these modifications occur in development, especially since environmental exposures may affect individuals at different stages of their life, with varying effects depending on the timing and dose.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2>Special Topic: Epigenetics and X Chromosome Inactivation<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 181px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30.jpg\" alt=\"A cat that has a multicolored coat pattern in colors of black, orange, and white.\" width=\"181\" height=\"201\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.34: A multicolored coat pattern as the result of X chromosome inactivation during development. Credit: \u201cRue\u201d the calico cat by Hayley Mann is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mary Lyon was a British geneticist who presented a hypothesis for X chromosome inactivation (called the <em>Lyon hypothesis<\/em>) based on her work and other studies of the day. Females inherit two X chromosomes, one from each parent. Males have one functional X chromosome; however, this does not mean females have more active genes than males. During the genetic embryonic development of many female mammals, one of the X chromosomes is inactivated at random, so females have one functional X chromosome. The process of X chromosome inactivation in females occurs through epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications. Recent studies have analyzed the role of a long noncoding RNA called X-inactive specific transcript (XIST), which is largely responsible for the random silencing of one of the X chromosomes. The presence of two X chromosomes is the signal for XIST RNA to be expressed so that one X chromosome can be inactivated. However, some cells may have an active paternal X chromosome while other cells may have an active maternal X chromosome. This phenomenon is easily seen in calico and tortoiseshell cats (Figure 4.34). In cats, the gene that controls coat color is found on the X chromosome. During early embryo development, random inactivation of X chromosomes gives rise to populations of cells that express black or orange, which results in the unique coat patterning. Therefore, calico cats are typically always female.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic Testing<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To assist with public health efforts, newborn screening for genetic diseases has been available in the United States for over 50 years. One of the first available genetic tests was to confirm a phenylketonuria (PKU) diagnosis in infants, which is easily treatable with a dietary change. Currently, each state decides what genes are included on newborn screening panels and some states even have programs to help with infant medical follow-ups. There are now hundreds of laboratories that provide testing for a few thousand different genes that can inform medical decisions for infants and adults. Moreover, genetic testing has been made available publicly to anyone without the assistance of medical professionals.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Clinical Testing<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clinical genetics tests assist patients with making medically informed decisions about family planning and health. Applications of this technology include assistance with<em> in vitro<\/em> fertilization (IVF) procedures, embryo genetic screening, and personalized medicine such as matching patients to cancer therapies. To ensure accuracy of patient genetic screening, it is important that all clinical laboratories are regulated. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) are United States federal standards that all human laboratory testing clinics must follow. A major benefit provided by some clinical genetic testing companies is access to genetic counselors, who have specialized education and training in medical genetics and counseling. For individuals with a family history of genetic disease, a physician may recommend genetic carrier screening to see if there is a risk for passing on a disease to a child. Genetic counselors provide expertise with interpretation of genetic testing results, as well as help guide and support patients when making impactful medical decisions.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">What is the purpose of DNA replication? Explain in a few sentences what happens during DNA replication. When do DNA mutations happen? And how does this create phenotypic variation (i.e., different phenotypes of the same physical trait)?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Using your own words, what are homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids? What are the key differences between mitosis and meiosis?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Determine if the pedigree diagram below (Figure 4.40) represents an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance. You should write the genotype (i.e., AA, Aa, or aa) above each square to help you (note: there may sometimes be two possible answers for a square\u2019s genotype). Please also explain why you concluded a particular pattern of inheritance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 247px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image36.png\" alt=\"Pedigree where 6 of 15 individuals have the trait. On 2 separate branches parents without the trait have a biological child who does.\" width=\"247\" height=\"214\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4.40: A four generation pedigree depicting a trait with an undetermined inheritance pattern. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-9\/\">X-linked recessive pattern of inheritance (Figure 3.46)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Beth Shook is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Use base pairing rules to transcribe the following DNA template sequence into mRNA: GTAAAGGTGCTGGCCATC. Next, use the protein codon table (see Figure 4.21) to translate the sequence. In regard to transcription, explain what the significance is of the first and last codon\/protein in the sequence.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">In your opinion, what do you think the benefits are of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing? What are the drawbacks and\/or greater ethical concerns? Do you think benefits outweigh concerns?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Imagine that you submit your DNA sample to a genetic testing company and among the various diseases for which they test, there is an allele that is associated with late-onset Alzheimer\u2019s disease. You have the option to view your Alzheimer\u2019s result or to not view your result. What do you do and why?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)<\/strong>: A high-energy compound produced by mitochondria that powers cellular processes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Allele<\/strong>: A nonidentical DNA sequence found in the same gene location on a homologous chromosome, or gene copy, that codes for the same trait but produces a different phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Amino acids<\/strong>: Organic molecules that are the building blocks of protein. Each of the 20 different amino acids have their own unique chemical property. Amino acids are chained together to form proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ancient DNA (aDNA)<\/strong>: DNA that is extracted from organic remains and that often dates from hundreds to thousands of years ago. Also, aDNA is typically degraded (i.e., damaged) due to exposure to the elements such as heat, acidity, and humidity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Aneuploid<\/strong>: A cell with an unexpected amount of chromosomes. The loss or gain of chromosomes can occur during mitotic or meiotic division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Antibodies<\/strong>: Immune-related proteins that can detect and bind to foreign substances in the blood such as pathogens.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Apoptosis<\/strong>: A series of molecular steps that is activated leading to cell death. Apoptosis can be activated when a cell fails checkpoints during the cell cycle; however, cancer cells have the ability to avoid apoptosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Autosomal<\/strong>: Refers to a pattern of inheritance in which an allele is located on an autosome (non sex chromosome).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Base pairs<\/strong>: Chemical bonding between nucleotides. In DNA, adenine (A) pairs with thymine (T) and cytosine (C) pairs with guanine (G); in RNA, adenine (A) always pairs with uracil (U).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carbohydrate<\/strong>: Molecules composed of carbon and hydrogen atoms that can be broken down to supply energy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carrier<\/strong>: An individual who has a heterozygous genotype that is typically associated with a disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell cycle<\/strong>: A cycle the cell undergoes with checkpoints between phases to ensure that DNA replication and cell division occur properly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cell surface antigen<\/strong>: A protein that is found on a red blood cell\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Centromere<\/strong>: A structural feature that is defined as the \u201ccenter\u201d of a chromosome and that creates two different arm lengths. This term also refers to the region of attachment for microtubules during mitosis and meiosis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromatin<\/strong>: DNA wrapped around histone complexes. During cell division, chromatin becomes a condensed chromosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chromosome<\/strong>: DNA molecule that is wrapped around protein complexes, including histones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Codominance<\/strong>: The effects of both alleles in a genotype can be seen in the phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Codons<\/strong>: A sequence that comprises three DNA nucleotides that together code for a protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Complex diseases<\/strong>: A category of diseases that are polygenic and are also influenced by environment and lifestyle factors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cytoplasm<\/strong>: The \u201cjelly-like\u201d matrix inside of the cell that contains many organelles and other cellular molecules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deleterious<\/strong>: A mutation that increases an organism\u2019s susceptibility to disease.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)<\/strong>: A molecule that carries the hereditary information passed down from parents to offspring. DNA can be described as a \u201cdouble helix\u201d\u2019 shape. It includes two chains of nucleotides held together by hydrogen bonds with a sugar phosphate backbone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Diploid<\/strong>: Refers to an organism or cell with two sets of chromosomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA methylation<\/strong>: Methyl groups bind DNA, which modifies the transcriptional activity of a gene by turning it \u201con\u201d or \u201coff.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA polymerase<\/strong>: Enzyme that adds nucleotides to existing nucleic acid strands during DNA replication. These enzymes can be distinguished by their processivity (e.g., DNA replication).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA replication<\/strong>: Cellular process in which DNA is copied and doubled.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>DNA sequence<\/strong>: The order of nucleotide bases. A DNA sequence can be short, long, or representative of entire chromosomes or organismal genomes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dominant<\/strong>: Refers to an allele for which one copy is sufficient to be visible in the phenotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Elongation<\/strong>: The assembly of new DNA from template strands with the help of DNA polymerases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Enzymes<\/strong>: Proteins responsible for catalyzing (accelerating) various biochemical reactions in cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetic profile<\/strong>: The methylation pattern throughout a genome\u2014that is, which genes (and other genomic sites) are methylated and unmethylated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Epigenetics<\/strong>: Changes in gene expression that do not result in a change of the underlying DNA sequence. These changes typically involve DNA methylation and histone modifications. These changes are reversible and can also be inherited by the next generation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Euchromatin<\/strong>: Loosely coiled chromosomes found within the nucleus that are accessible for regulatory processing of DNA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Eukaryote<\/strong>: Single-celled or multicelled organism characterized by a distinct nucleus, with each organelle surrounded by its own membrane.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exon<\/strong>: Protein-coding segment of a gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gametes<\/strong>: Haploid cells referred to as an egg and sperm that will fuse together during sexual reproduction to form a diploid organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gene<\/strong>: Segment of DNA that contains protein-coding information and various regulatory (e.g., promoter) and noncoding (e.g., introns) regions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genetic recombination<\/strong>: A cellular process that occurs during meiosis I in which homologous chromosomes pair up and sister chromatids on different chromosomes physically swap genetic information.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genome<\/strong>: All the genetic information of an organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotype<\/strong>: The combination of two alleles that code for or are associated with the same gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Genotyping<\/strong>: A molecular procedure that is performed to test for the presence of certain alleles or to discover new ones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Germ cells<\/strong>: Specialized cells that form gametes (egg and sperm cells).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Haploid<\/strong>: Cell or organism with one set of chromosomes (<em>n<\/em> = 23).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Helicase<\/strong>: A protein that breaks the hydrogen bonds that hold double-stranded DNA together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Heterozygous<\/strong>: Genotype that consists of two different alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Histones<\/strong>: Proteins that DNA wraps around to assist with DNA organization within the nucleus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homologous chromosomes<\/strong>: A matching pair of chromosomes wherein one chromosome is maternally inherited and the other is paternally inherited.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homozygous<\/strong>: Genotype that consists of two identical alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Incomplete dominance<\/strong>: Heterozygous genotype that produces a phenotype that is a blend of both alleles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Initiation<\/strong>: The recruitment of proteins to separate DNA strands and begin DNA replication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interphase<\/strong>: Preparatory period of the cell cycle when increased metabolic demand allows for DNA replication and doubling of the cell prior to cell division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Introns<\/strong>: Segment of DNA that does not code for proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Karyotyping<\/strong>: The microscopic procedure wherein the number of chromosomes in a cell is determined.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Lagging strand<\/strong>: DNA template strand that is opposite to the leading strand during DNA replication. This strand is created in several disconnected sections and other enzymes fill in the missing nucleotide gaps between these sections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Leading strand<\/strong>: DNA template strand in which replication proceeds continuously.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Lipids<\/strong>: Fatty acid molecules that serve various purposes in the cell, including energy storage, cell signaling, and structure.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Meiosis<\/strong>: The process that gametes undergo to divide. The end of meiosis results in four haploid daughter cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mendelian genetics<\/strong>: A classification given to phenotypic traits that are controlled by a single gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Messenger RNA (mRNA)<\/strong>: RNA molecule that is transcribed from DNA. Its tri-nucleotide codons are \u201cread\u201d by a ribosome to build a protein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microarray technology<\/strong>: A genotyping procedure that utilizes a microarray chip, which is a collection of thousands of short nucleotide sequences attached to a solid surface that can probe genomic DNA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microbiome<\/strong>: The collective genomes of the community of microorganisms that humans have living inside of their bodies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)<\/strong>: Circular DNA segment found in mitochondria that is inherited maternally.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitochondrion<\/strong>: Specialized cellular organelle that is the site for energy production. It also has its own genome (mtDNA).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mitosis<\/strong>: The process that somatic cells undergo to divide. The end of mitosis results in two diploid daughter cells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecular anthropologists<\/strong>: Individuals who use molecular techniques (primarily genetics) to compare ancient and modern populations and to study living populations of humans and nonhuman primates.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Molecular geneticists<\/strong>: Biologists that study the structure and function of genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mutation<\/strong>: A nucleotide sequence variation from the template DNA strand that can occur during replication. Mutations can also happen during recombination.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Next-generation sequencing<\/strong>: A genotyping technology that involves producing millions of nucleotide sequences (from a single DNA sample) that are then read with a sequencing machine. It can be used for analyzing entire genomes or specific regions and requires extensive program-based applications.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nuclear envelope<\/strong>: A double-layered membrane that encircles the nucleus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleic acid<\/strong>: A complex structure (like DNA or RNA) that carries genetic information about a living organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleotide<\/strong>: The basic structural component of nucleic acids, which includes DNA (A, T, C, and G) and RNA (A, U, C, and G).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nucleus<\/strong>: Double-membrane cellular organelle that helps protect DNA and also regulates nuclear activities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Organelle<\/strong>: A structure within a cell that performs specialized tasks that are essential for the cell. There are different types of organelles, each with its own function.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pathogenic<\/strong>: A genetic mutation (i.e., allele) that has a harmful phenotypic disease-causing effect.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Pedigree<\/strong>: A diagram of family relationships that indicates which members may have or carry certain genetic and\/or phenotypic traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Penetrance<\/strong>: The proportion of how often the possession of an allele results in an expected phenotype. Some alleles are more penetrant than others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phenotype<\/strong>: The physical appearance of a given trait.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Phospholipid bilayer<\/strong>: Two layers of lipids that form a barrier due to the properties of a hydrophilic (water-loving) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polygenic trait<\/strong>: A phenotype that is controlled by two or more genes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)<\/strong>: A molecular biology procedure that can make copies of genomic DNA segments. A small amount of DNA is used as a starting template and is then used to make millions of copies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Prokaryote<\/strong>: A single-celled organism characterized by the lack of a nucleus and membrane-enclosed organelles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Promoter<\/strong>: The region of a gene that initiates transcription. Transcription factors can bind and DNA methylation may occur at a promoter site, which can modify the transcriptional activities of a gene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Protein<\/strong>: Chain of amino acids that folds into a three-dimensional structure that allows a cell to function in a variety of ways.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Protein synthesis<\/strong>: A multi-step process by which amino acids are strung together by RNA machinery read from a DNA template.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Recessive<\/strong>: Refers to an allele whose effect is not normally seen unless two copies are present in an individual\u2019s genotype.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribonucleic acid (RNA)<\/strong>: Single-stranded nucleic acid molecule.There are different RNAs found within cells and they perform a variety of functions, such as cell signaling and involvement in protein synthesis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribosomal RNA (rRNA)<\/strong>: A ribosome-bound molecule that is used to correctly assemble amino acids into proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ribosome<\/strong>: An organelle in the cell found in the cytoplasm or endoplasmic reticulum. It is responsible for reading mRNA and protein assemblage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>RNA polymerase<\/strong>: An enzyme that catalyzes the process of making RNA from a DNA template.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sanger-sequencing<\/strong>: A process that involves the usage of fluorescently labeled nucleotides to visualize DNA (PCR fragments) at the nucleotide level.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Semi-conservative replication<\/strong>: DNA replication in which new DNA is replicated from an existing DNA template strand.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sequencing<\/strong>: A molecular laboratory procedure that produces the order of nucleotide bases (i.e., sequences).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sister chromatids<\/strong>: During DNA replication, sister chromatids are produced on the chromosome. In cell division, sister chromatids are pulled apart so that two cells can be formed. In meiosis, sister chromatids are also the sites of genetic recombination.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Somatic cells<\/strong>: Diploid cells that comprise body tissues and undergo mitosis for maintenance and repair of tissues.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Splicing<\/strong>: The process by which mature mRNAs are produced. Introns are removed (spliced) and exons are joined together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sugar phosphate backbone<\/strong>: A biochemical structural component of DNA. The \u201cbackbone\u201d consists of deoxyribose sugars and phosphate molecules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Telomere<\/strong>: A compound structure located at the ends of chromosomes to help protect the chromosomes from degradation after every round of cell division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Termination<\/strong>: The halt of DNA replication activity that occurs when a DNA sequence \u201cstop\u201d codon is encountered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Tissue<\/strong>: A cluster of cells that are morphologically similar and perform the same task.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription<\/strong>: The process by which DNA nucleotides (within a gene) are copied, which results in a messenger RNA molecule.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transcription factors<\/strong>: Proteins that bind to regulatory regions of genes (e.g., promoter) and increase or decrease the amount of transcriptional activity of a gene, including turning them \u201con\u201d or \u201coff.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Transfer RNA (tRNA)<\/strong>: RNA molecule involved in translation. Transfer RNA transports amino acids from the cell\u2019s cytoplasm to a ribosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Translation<\/strong>: The process by which messenger RNA codons are read and amino acids are \u201cchained together\u201d to form proteins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>X-linked<\/strong>: Refers to a pattern of inheritance where the allele is located on the X or Y chromosome.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.genome.gov\/\">National Human Genome Research Institute<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ghr.nlm.nih.gov\/\">Genetics Home Reference<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/knowgenetics.org\/\">Genetics Generation<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.yourgenome.org\/\">yourgenome<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">NOVA. 2018. Gene Sequencing Speeds Diagnosis of Deadly Newborn Diseases. NOVA, March 7, 2018. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/next\/body\/newborn-gene-sequencing\/\">https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/next\/body\/newborn-gene-sequencing\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zimmer, Carl. N.d. \u201cCarl Zimmer\u2019s Game of Genomes.\u201d STATnews. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/feature\/game-of-genomes\/season-one\/\">https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/feature\/game-of-genomes\/season-one\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Illumina. 2016. \u201cIllumina Sequencing by Synthesis.\u201d YouTube.com, October 5, 2016. Accessed January 31, 2023. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fCd6B5HRaZ8\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=fCd6B5HRaZ8<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Aartsma-Rus, Annemieke, Ieke B. Ginjaar, and Kate Bushby. 2016. \u201cThe Importance of Genetic Diagnosis for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.\u201d Journal of Medical Genetics 53 (3): 145\u2013151.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Acuna-Hidalgo, Rocio, Joris A. Veltman, and Alexander Hoischen. 2016. \u201cNew Insights into the Generation and Role of De Novo Mutations in Health and Disease.\u201d Genome Biology 17 (241): 1\u201319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Albert, Benjamin, Susanna Tomassetti, Yvonne Gloor, Daniel Dilg, Stefano Mattarocci, Slawomir Kubik, Lukas Hafner, and David Shore. 2019. \"Sfp1 Regulates Transcriptional Networks Driving Cell Growth and Division through Multiple Promoter-Binding Modes.\" Genes &amp; Development 33 (5\u20136): 288\u2013293.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Almathen, Faisal, Haitham Elbir, Hussain Bahbahani, Joram Mwacharo, and Olivier Hanotte. 2018. \u201cPolymorphisms in Mc1r and Asip Genes Are Associated with Coat Color Variation in the Arabian Camel.\u201d Journal of Heredity 109 (6): 700\u2013706.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ballester, Leomar Y., Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, and Rajesh R. Singh. 2016. \u201cAdvances in Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing: Target Enrichment and Sequencing Technologies.\u201d Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 16 (3): 357\u2013372.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Baranovskiy, Andrey G., Vincent N. Duong, Nigar D. Babayeva, Yinbo Zhang, Youri I. Pavlov, Karen S. Anderson, and Tahir H. Tahirov. 2018. \u201cActivity and Fidelity of Human DNA Polymerase Alpha Depend on Primer Structure.\u201d Journal of Biological Chemistry 293 (18): 6824\u20136843.<\/p>\n<p>Biswas, S., Ghosh, S., Das, S., &amp; Maitra, S. (2021). Female Reproduction: At the Crossroads of Endocrine Disruptors and Epigenetics. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 74(4), 532\u2013545. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12595-021-00403-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12595-021-00403-4<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Brezina, Paulina R., Raymond Anchan, and William G. Kearns. 2016. \u201cPreimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: What Technology Should You Use and What Are the Differences?\u201d Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 33 (7): 823\u2013832.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bultman, Scott J. 2017. \u201cInterplay Between Diet, Gut Microbiota, Epigenetic Events, and Colorectal Cancer.\" Molecular Nutrition &amp; Food Research 61 (1):1\u201312.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cutting, Garry R. 2015. \u201cCystic Fibrosis Genetics: From Molecular Understanding to Clinical Application.\u201d Nature Reviews Genetics 16 (1): 45\u201356.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">D'Alessandro, Giuseppina., and Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna. 2017. \u201cTranscription and DNA Damage: Holding Hands or Crossing Swords?\u201d Journal of Molecular Biology 429 (21): 3215\u20133229.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">De Craene, Johan-Owen, Dimitri L. Bertazzi, S\u00e9verine Bar, and Sylvie Friant. 2017. \u201cPhosphoinositides, Major Actors in Membrane Trafficking and Lipid Signaling Pathways.\u201d International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (3): 1\u201320.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Deng, Lian, and Shuhua Xu. 2018. \u201cAdaptation of Human Skin Color in Various Populations.\u201d Hereditas 155 (1): 1\u201312.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dever, Thomas E., Terri G. Kinzy, and Graham D. Pavitt. 2016. \u201cMechanism and Regulation of Protein Synthesis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.\u201d Genetics 203 (1): 65\u2013107.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Eme, Laura, Anja Spang, Jonathan Lombard, Courtney W. Stairs, and Thijs J. G. Ettema. 2017. \u201cArchaea and the Origin of Eukaryotes.\u201d Nature Reviews Microbiology 15 (12): 711\u2013723.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gomez-Carballa, Alberto, Jacobo Pardo-Seco, Stefania Brandini, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Michael D. Coble, Toni M. Diegoli, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Peopling of South America and the Trans-Andean Gene Flow of the First Settlers.\u201d Genome Research 28 (6): 767\u2013779.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gvozdenov, Zlata, Janhavi Kolhe, and Brian C. Freeman. 2019. \u201cThe Nuclear and DNA-Associated Molecular Chaperone Network.\u201d Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 11 (10): a034009.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Harkins, Kelly M., and Anne C. Stone. 2015. \u201cAncient Pathogen Genomics: Insights into Timing and Adaptation.\u201d Journal of Human Evolution 79: 137\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jackson, Maria, Leah Marks, Gerhard H. W. May, and Joanna B. Wilson. 2018. \u201cThe Genetic Basis of Disease.\u201d Essays in Biochemistry 62 (5): 643\u2013723.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lenormand, Thomas, Jan Engelstadter, Susan E. Johnston, Erik Wijnker, and Christopher R. Haag. 2016. \u201cEvolutionary Mysteries in Meiosis.\u201d Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 1\u201314.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Levy, Shawn E., and Richard M. Myers. 2016. \u201cAdvancements in Next-Generation Sequencing.\u201d Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 17: 95\u2013115.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lindo, John, Emilia Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Shigeki Nakagome, Morten Rasmussen, Barbara Petzelt, Joycelynn Mitchell, Jerome S. Cybulski, et al. 2016. \"A Time Transect of Exomes from a Native American Population Before and After European Contact.\" Nature Communications 7: 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ncomms13175.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lu, Mengfei, Cathryn M. Lewis, and Matthew Traylor. 2017. \u201cPharmacogenetic Testing through the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Company 23andme.\u201d BMC Medical Genomics 10 (47): 1\u20138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ly, Lundi, Donovan Chan, Mahmoud Aarabi, Mylene Landry, Nathalie A. Behan, Amanda J. MacFarlane, and Jacquetta Trasler. 2017. \u201cIntergenerational Impact of Paternal Lifetime Exposures to Both Folic Acid Deficiency and Supplementation on Reproductive Outcomes and Imprinted Gene Methylation.\u201d Molecular Human Reproduction 23 (7): 461\u2013477.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ma, Wenxiu, Giancarlo Bonora, Joel B. Berletch, Xinxian Deng, William S. Noble, and Christine M. Disteche. 2018. \u201cX-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse.\u201d Methods in Molecular Biology 1861: 205\u2013219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Machiela, Mitchell J., Weiyin Zhou, Eric Karlins, Joshua N. Sampson, Neal D. Freedman, Qi Yang, Belynda Hicks, et al. 2016. \u201cFemale Chromosome X Mosaicism Is Age-Related and Preferentially Affects the Inactivated X Chromosome.\u201d Nature Communications 7: 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ncomms11843.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mahdavi, Morteza, Mohammadreza Nassiri, Mohammad M. Kooshyar, Masoume Vakili-Azghandi, Amir Avan, Ryan Sandry, Suja Pillai, Alfred K. Lam, and Vinod Gopalan. 2019. \u201cHereditary Breast Cancer; Genetic Penetrance and Current Status with BRCA.\u201d Journal of Cellular Physiology 234 (5): 5741\u20135750.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">McDade, Thomas W., Calen P. Ryan, Meaghan J. Jones, Morgan K. Hoke, Judith Borja, Gregory E. Miller, Christopher W. Kuzawa, and Michael S. Kobor. 2019. \u201cGenome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Relation to Socioeconomic Status During Development and Early Adulthood.\u201d American Journal of Physical Anthropology 169 (1): 3\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Migeon, Barbara R. 2017. \u201cChoosing the Active X: The Human Version of X Inactivation.\u201d Trends in Genetics 33 (12): 899\u2013909.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Myerowitz, Rachel. 1997. \u201cTay-Sachs Disease-Causing Mutations and Neutral Polymorphisms in the Hex A Gene.\u201d Human Mutation 9 (3): 195\u2013208.<\/p>\n<p>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2024, July 22). Endocrine Disruptors. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; United States Government. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.niehs.nih.gov\/health\/topics\/agents\/endocrine\">https:\/\/www.niehs.nih.gov\/health\/topics\/agents\/endocrine<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Onufriev, Alexey V., and Helmut Schiessel. 2019. \u201cThe Nucleosome: From Structure to Function through Physics.\u201d Current Opinion in Structural Biology 56: 119\u2013130.<\/p>\n<p>Peedicayil J. (2006). Epigenetic therapy--a new development in pharmacology. The Indian journal of medical research, 123(1), 17\u201324.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Quillen, Ellen E., Heather L. Norton, Esteban J. Parra, Frida Lona-Durazo, Khai C. Ang, Florin M. Illiescu, Laurel N. Pearson, et al. 2019. \u201cShades of Complexity: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Genetic Architecture of Human Skin.\u201d American Journal of Physical Anthropology 168 (67): 4\u201326.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Raspelli, Erica, and Roberta Fraschini. 2019. \u201cSpindle Pole Power in Health and Disease.\u201d Current Genetics 65 (4): 851\u2013855.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ravinet, M., R. Faria, R. K. Butlin, J. Galindo, N. Bierne, M. Rafajlovic, M. A. F. Noor, B. Mehlig, and A. M. Westram. 2017. \u201cInterpreting the Genomic Landscape of Speciation: A Road Map for Finding Barriers to Gene Flow.\u201d Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30 (8): 1450\u20131477.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Regev, Aviv, Sarah A. Teichmann, Eric S. Lander, Ido Amit, Christophe Benoist, Ewan Birney, Bernd Bodenmiller, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Human Cell Atlas.\u201d Elife 6e27041: 1\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554.eLife.27041.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roberts, Andrea L., Nicole Gladish, Evan Gatev, Meaghan J. Jones, Ying Chen, Julia L. MacIsaac, Shelley S. Tworoger, et al. 2018. \u201cExposure to Childhood Abuse Is Associated with Human Sperm DNA Methylation.\u201d Translational Psychiatry 8 (194): 1\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roger, Andrew J., Sergio A. Mu\u00f1oz-G\u00f3mez, and Ryoma Kamikawa. 2017. \u201cThe Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria.\u201d Current Biology 27 (21): R1177\u2013R1192. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S096098221731179X?via%3Dihub#!<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">S\u00e9gurel, Laure, and C\u00e9line Bon. 2017. \u201cOn the Evolution of Lactase Persistence in Humans.\u201d Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 18: 297\u2013319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sheth, Bhavisha P., and Vrinda S. Thaker. 2017. \u201cDNA Barcoding and Traditional Taxonomy: An Integrated Approach for Biodiversity Conservation.\u201d Genome 60 (7): 618\u2013628.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Skloot, Rebecca. 2010. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishing Group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Snedeker, Jonathan, Matthew Wooten, and Xin Chen. 2017. \u201cThe Inherent Asymmetry of DNA Replication.\u201d Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 33: 291\u2013318.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sullivan-Pyke, Chantae, and Anuja Dokras. 2018. \u201cPreimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.\u201d Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 45 (1): 113\u2013125.<\/p>\n<p>Sweeney, M. F., Hasan, N., Soto, A. M., &amp; Sonnenschein, C. (2015). Environmental endocrine disruptors: Effects on the human male reproductive system. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 16(4), 341\u2013357. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11154-016-9337-4\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11154-016-9337-4<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Szostak, Jack W. 2017. \u201cThe Narrow Road to the Deep Past: In Search of the Chemistry of the Origin of Life.\u201d Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56 (37): 11037\u201311043.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tessema, Mathewos, Ulrich Lehmann, and Hans Kreipe. 2004. \u201cCell Cycle and No End.\u201d Virchows Archiv European Journal of Pathology 444 (4): 313\u2013323.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tishkoff, Sarah A., Floyd A. Reed, Alessia Ranciaro, Benjamin F. Voight, Courtney C. Babbitt, Jesse S. Silverman, Kweli Powell, et al. 2007. \u201cConvergent Adaptation of Human Lactase Persistence in Africa and Europe.\u201d Nature Genetics 39 (1): 31\u201340.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Visootsak, Jeannie, and John M. Graham, Jr. 2006. \u201cKlinefelter Syndrome and Other Sex Chromosomal Aneuploidies.\u201d Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1:42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1750-1172-1-42.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wolfe, George C., dir. 2017. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. HBO Films, April 22, 2017. TV Movie.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Yamamoto, Fumi-ichiro, Henrik Clausen, Thayer White, John Marken, and Sen-itiroh Hakomori. 1990. \u201cMolecular Genetic Basis of the Histo-Blood Group ABO System.\u201d Nature 345 (6272): 229\u2013233.<\/p>\n<p>Yu, X., Zhao, H., Wang, R., Chen, Y., Ouyang, X., Li, W., Sun, Y., &amp; Peng, A. (2024). Cancer epigenetics: from laboratory studies and clinical trials to precision medicine. Cell Death Discovery, 10(1), 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41420-024-01803-z<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zlotogora, Jo\u00ebl. 2003. \u201cPenetrance and Expressivity in the Molecular Age.\u201d Genetics in Medicine 5 (5): 347\u2013352.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zorina-Lichtenwalter, Katerina, Ryan N. Lichtenwalter, Dima V. Zaykin, Marc Parisien, Simon Gravel, Andrey Bortsov, and Luda Diatchenko. 2019. \u201cA Study in Scarlet: MC1R as the Main Predictor of Red Hair and Exemplar of the Flip-Flop Effect.\u201d Human Molecular Genetics 28 (12): 2093-2106.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zwart, Haeh. 2018. \u201cIn the Beginning Was the Genome: Genomics and the Bi-Textuality of Human Existence.\u201d New Bioethics 24 (1): 26\u201343.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_940\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_940\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_944\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_944\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sarah S. King, Ph.D., Cerro Coso Community College<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Kara Jones, M.A., Ph.D. student, University of Nevada Las Vegas<\/p>\n<h6>Student conbtributors for this chapter: Catherine Belec, Maria Papadakis, Camille Senior and Nadjat Baril<\/h6>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>This chapter<\/em><em> is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId6\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\"><em>Chapter 7: Understanding the Fossil Context<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Sarah King and Lee Anne Zajicek. <\/em><em>In <\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Identify the different types of fossils and describe how they are formed.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Discuss relative and chronometric dating methods, the type of material they analyze, and their applications.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Describe the methods used to reconstruct past environments.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Interpret a site using the methods described in this chapter.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fossil Study: An Evolving Process<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mary Anning and the Age of Wonder<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 206px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/05\/image12.jpg\" alt=\"Woman points to dog and fossil on the ground.\" width=\"206\" height=\"248\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.1: An oil painting of Mary Anning and her dog, Tray, prior to 1845. The \u201cJurassic Coast\u201d of Lyme Regis is in the background. Notice that Anning is pointing at a fossil. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mary_Anning_by_B._J._Donne.jpg\">Mary Anning by B. J. Donne<\/a> from the Geological Society\/NHMPL is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mary Anning (1799\u20131847) is likely the most famous fossil hunter you\u2019ve never heard of (Figure 8.1). Anning lived her entire life in Lyme Regis on the Dorset coast in England. As a woman, born to a poor family, with minimal education (even by 19th-century standards), the odds were against Anning becoming a scientist (Emling 2009, xii). It was remarkable that Anning was eventually able to influence the great scientists of the day with her fossil discoveries and her subsequent hypotheses regarding evolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The time when Anning lived was a remarkable period in human history because of the Industrial Revolution in Britain. Moreover, the scientific discoveries of the 18th and 19th centuries set the stage for great leaps of knowledge and understanding about humans and the natural world. Barely a century earlier, Sir Isaac Newton had developed his theories on physics and become the president of the Royal Society of London (Dolnick 2011, 5). In this framework, the pursuit of intellectual and scientific discovery became a popular avocation for many individuals, the vast majority of whom were wealthy men (Figure 8.2).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 358px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22-1.png\" alt=\"Robed figure near a rock structure.\" width=\"358\" height=\"273\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.2: A Walk at Dusk, 1830\u20131835, by Caspar David Friedrich, is a painting likely of a dolmen, a megalithic (large rock) tomb. Dolmens were built throughout Europe, five to six thousand years ago. Scholars were fascinated by the ancient world, which was an accepted part of Earth\u2019s history, even if explanation defied nonsecular thought. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.getty.edu\/art\/collection\/object\/103RJX\">A Walk at Dusk object 93.PA.14<\/a> by Casper David Friedrich German, 1774\u20131840, Paul Getty Museum, is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a> and part of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.getty.edu\/projects\/open-content-program\/\">Getty Open Content Program<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In spite of the expectations of Georgian English society to the contrary, Anning became a highly successful fossil hunter as well as a self-educated geologist and anatomist. The geology of Lyme Regis, with its limestone cliffs, provided a fortuitous backdrop for Anning\u2019s lifework. Now called the \u201cJurassic Coast,\u201d Lyme Regis has always been a rich source for fossilized remains (Figure 8.3). Continuing her father\u2019s passion for fossil hunting, Anning scoured the crumbling cliffs after storms for fossilized remains and shells. The work was physically demanding and downright dangerous. In 1833, while searching for fossils, Anning lost her beloved dog in a landslide and nearly lost her own life in the process (Emling 2009).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 283px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14-1.jpg\" alt=\"Rocky coastline and cliffs.\" width=\"283\" height=\"212\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.3: The \u201cJurassic Coast\u201d of Lyme Regis: the home of fossil hunter Mary Anning. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/lyme-regis-coast-sea-cliffs-924431\/\">Lyme-regis-coast-sea-cliffs-924431<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/jstarj-884623\/\">jstarj<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a> under a <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/terms\/#license\">Pixabay License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Around the age of ten, Anning located and excavated a complete fossilized skeleton of an ichthyosaurus (\u201cfish lizard\u201d). She eventually found <em>Pterodactylus macronyx<\/em> and a 2.7-meter <em>Plesiosaurus<\/em>, considered by many to be her greatest discovery (Figure 8.4). These discoveries proved that there had been significant changes in the way living things appeared throughout the history of the world. Like many of her peers, including Darwin, Anning had strong religious convictions. However, the evidence that was being found in the fossil record was contradictory to the Genesis story in the Bible. In <em>The Fossil Hunter: Dinosaurs, Evolution, and the Woman Whose Discoveries Changed the World<\/em>, Anning\u2019s biographer Shelley Emling (2009, 38) notes, \u201cthe puzzling attributes of Mary\u2019s fossil [ichthyosaurus] struck a blow at this belief and eventually helped pave the way for a real understanding of life before the age of humans.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 247px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21.png\" alt=\"Plesiosaurus drawing.\" width=\"247\" height=\"375\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.4: Plesiosaurus, illustrated and described by Mary Anning in an undated handwritten letter. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/wellcomecollection.org\/works\/cezbevj4\">Autograph letter concerning the discovery of plesiosaurus<\/a> by Mary Anning (1799\u20131847) from the <a href=\"https:\/\/wellcomecollection.org\">Wellcome Collection<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Intellectual and scientific debate now had physical evidence to support the theory of evolution, which would eventually result in Darwin\u2019s seminal work,<em> On the Origin of Species<\/em> (1859). Anning\u2019s discoveries and theories were appreciated and advocated by her friends, intellectual men who were associated with the Geological Society of London. Regrettably, this organization was closed to women, and Anning received little official recognition for her contributions to the fields of natural history and palaeontology. It is clear that Anning\u2019s knowledge, diligence, and uncanny luck in finding magnificent specimens of fossils earned her unshakeable credibility and made her a peer to many antiquarians (Emling 2009).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fossil hunting is still providing evidence and a narrative of the story of Earth. Mary Anning recognized the value of fossils in understanding natural history and relentlessly championed her theories to the brightest minds of her day. Anning\u2019s ability to creatively think \u201coutside the box\u201d\u2014skillfully assimilating knowledge from multiple academic fields\u2014was her gift to our present understanding of the fossil record. Given how profoundly Anning has shaped how we, in the modern day, think about the origins of life, it is surprising that her contributions have been so marginalized. Anning\u2019s name should be on the tip of everyone\u2019s tongue. Fortunately, at least in one sense of the word, it is. The well-known tongue twister, below, may have been written about Mary Anning:<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 130.5pt;text-indent: 36pt\">She sells sea-shells on the sea-shore.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 130.5pt;text-indent: 36pt\">The shells she sells are sea-shells, I\u2019m sure.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 130.5pt;text-indent: 36pt\">For if she sells sea-shells on the sea-shore<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 130.5pt;text-indent: 36pt\">Then I\u2019m sure she sells sea-shore shells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 130.5pt;text-indent: 36pt\">\u2014T. Sullivan (1908)<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Developing Modern <\/strong><strong>Methods<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As Mary Anning\u2019s story suggests, scientists in Europe were working at a time dominated by western Christian tradition. Literal interpretations of the bible did not allow for the long, slow processes of geological or evolutionary change to operate. However, many scientists were making observations that did not fit the biblical narrative. During the 18th century, Scotsman James Hutton\u2019s work on the formation of Earth provided a much longer timeline of events than previous biblical interpretations would allow. Hutton\u2019s theory of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_826\">Deep Time<\/a><\/strong> was crucial to the understanding of fossils. Deep Time gave the history of Earth enough time\u20144.543 billion years\u2014to encompass <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_828\">continental drift<\/a><\/strong>, the evolution of species, and the fossilization process. A second Scotsman, Charles Lyell, propelled Hutton\u2019s work into his own theory of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_830\">uniformitarianism<\/a><\/strong>, the doctrine that Earth\u2019s geologic formations are the work of slow geologic forces. Lyell\u2019s three-volume work, <em>Principles of Geology<\/em> (1830\u20131833), was influential to naturalist Charles Darwin (see Chapter 2 for more information on Darwin\u2019s work). In fact, Lyell\u2019s first volume accompanied Darwin on his five-year voyage around the world on the <em>HMS Beagle<\/em> (1831\u20131836). The concepts proposed by Lyell gave Darwin an opportunity to apply his working theories of evolution by natural selection and a greater length of time with which to work. These resulting theories were important scientific discoveries and paved the way for the \u201cAge of Wonder\u201d (Holmes 2010, xvi).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 264px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30-1.jpg\" alt=\"Fossilized shell.\" width=\"264\" height=\"176\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.5: Murexsul (Miocene): This fossil was found at the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, in 1945. The fossil was buried deep in the strata and was pulled out of the ground along with a crashed \u201cFat Boy\u201d missile after atomic missile testing (S. Brubaker, personal communication, March 9, 2018). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Murexsul (Figure 7.6)<\/a> from the <a href=\"https:\/\/maturango.org\/\">Maturango Museum<\/a>, Ridgecrest, California, by Sarah S. King and Lee Anne Zajicek is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The work of Anning, Darwin, Lyell, and many others laid the foundation for the modern methods we use today. Though anthropology is focused on humans and our primate relatives (and not on dinosaurs, as many people wrongly assume), you will see that methods developed in paleontology, geology, chemistry, biology, and physics are often applied in anthropological research. In this chapter, you will learn about the primary methods and techniques employed by biological anthropologists to answer questions about <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_832\">fossils<\/a><\/strong>, the mineralized copies of once-living organisms (Figure 8.5). Ultimately, these answers provide insights into human evolution. Pay close attention to ways in which modern biological anthropologists use other disciplines to analyze evidence and reconstruct past activities and environments.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Earth: It's Older than Dirt<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientists have developed precise and accurate dating methods based on work in the fields of physics and chemistry. Using these methods, scientists are able to establish the age of Earth as well as approximate ages of the organisms that have lived here. Earth is roughly 4.6 billion years old, give or take a few hundred million years. The first evidence for a living organism appeared around 3.5 billion years ago (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_844\">bya<\/a><\/strong>)<strong>.<\/strong> The scale of geologic time can seem downright overwhelming. In order to organize and make sense of Earth\u2019s past, geologists break up that time into subunits, which are human-made divisions along Earth\u2019s timeline. The largest subunit is the <strong>eon. <\/strong>An eon is further divided into <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_836\">eras<\/a>,<\/strong> and eras are divided into <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_838\">periods<\/a><\/strong>. Finally, periods are divided into <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_846\">epochs<\/a><\/strong> (see Figure 8.6; Williams 2004, 37). Currently, we are living in the Phanerozoic eon, Cenozoic era, Quaternary period, and probably the Holocene epoch\u2014though there is academic debate about the current epoch (see below).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_248\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-248\" style=\"width: 1134px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-226 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/Geo-Time-Scale-FY17.jpeg\" alt=\"Table of geological time scale and examples. Full text link in caption.\" width=\"1134\" height=\"1300\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-248\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.6: The Geologic time scale is shown here, with periods broken into eons, eras, periods, and in some cases epochs. Some life forms and geological events are noted for each period. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/subjects\/geology\/time-scale.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Geologic Time Scale<\/a>, by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/index.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Park Service<\/a>, designed by Trista Thornberry-Ehrlich and Rebecca Port, adapted from ones from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">USGS<\/a> and the International Commission on Stratigraphy, is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/aboutus\/disclaimer.htm#:~:text=%C2%A7%C2%A7%20101%2C%20105)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">These divisions are based on major changes and events recorded in the geologic record. Events like significant shifts in climate or mass extinctions can be used to mark the end of one geologic time unit and the beginning of another. However, it is important to remember that these borders are not real in a physical sense; they are helpful organizational guidelines for scientific research. There can be debate regarding how the boundaries are defined. Additionally, the methods we use to establish these dates are refined over time, occasionally leading to shifts in established chronology (see the discussion on calibration in the radiocarbon dating section below). For instance, the current epoch has been traditionally known as the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_840\">Holocene<\/a><\/strong>. It began almost twelve thousand years ago (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_842\">kya<\/a><\/strong>) during the warming period after that last major ice age. Today, there is evidence to indicate human-driven climate change is warming the world and changing the environmental patterns faster than the natural cyclical processes. This has led some scientists within the stratigraphic community to argue for a new epoch beginning around 1950 with the Nuclear Age called the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_848\">Anthropocene<\/a> <\/strong>(Monastersky 2015; Waters et al. 2016). Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen places the beginning of the Anthropocene much earlier\u2014at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, with its polluting effects of burning coal (Crutzen and Stoermer 2000, 17\u201318). Geologist William Ruddiman argues that the epoch began 5,000\u20138,000 years ago with the advent of agriculture and the buildup of early methane gasses (Ruddiman et al. 2008). Regardless of when the Anthropocene started, the major event that marks the boundary is the warming temperatures and mass extinction of nonhuman species caused by human activity (Figure 8.7). Researchers now declare that \u201chuman activity now rivals geologic forces in influencing the trajectory of the Earth System\u201d (Steffen et al. 2018, 1).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 299px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1.jpg\" alt=\"Two cylindrical towers emitting white steam.\" width=\"299\" height=\"168\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.7: The Chooz Nuclear Power, in a valley in Ardennes, France, is a reminder that human activity affects the planet greatly. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Chooz_Nuclear_Power_Plant-9361.jpg\">Chooz Nuclear Power Plant-9361<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Raymond\">Raimond Spekking<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fossils: The Taphonomic Process<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Most of the evidence of human evolution comes from the study of the dead. To obtain as much information as possible from the remains of once-living creatures, one must understand the processes that occur after death. This is where <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_850\">taphonomy<\/a><\/strong> comes in (Figure 8.8). Taphonomy includes the study of how an organism becomes a fossil. However, as you\u2019ll see throughout this book, the majority of organisms never make it through the full fossilization process.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 261px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25-1.jpg\" alt=\"Coyote skull with bones and fur.\" width=\"261\" height=\"348\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.8: Taphonomy focuses on what happens to the remains of an organism, like this coyote, after death. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Coyote remains (Figure 7.14)<\/a> by Sarah S. King is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taphonomy is important in biological anthropology, especially in subdisciplines like bioarchaeology (the study of human remains in the archaeological record) and zooarchaeology (the study of faunal remains from archaeological sites). It is so important that many scientists have recreated a variety of burial and decay experiments to track taphonomic change in modern contexts. These contexts can then be used to understand the taphonomic patterns seen in the fossil record (see Reitz &amp; Wing 1999, 122\u2013141).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Going back further in time, taphonomic evidence may tell us how our ancestors died. For instance, several australopithecine fossils show evidence of carnivore tooth marks and even punctures from saber-toothed cats, indicating that we weren\u2019t always the top of the food chain. The Bodo Cranium, a <em>Homo erectus<\/em> cranium from Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia, shows cut marks made by stone tools, indicating an early example of possible defleshing activity in our human ancestors (White 1986). At the archaeological site of Zhoukoudian, researchers used taphonomy to show that the highly fragmented remains of at least 51 <em>Homo erectus<\/em> individuals were scavenged by Pleistocene cave hyenas (Boaz Et al. 2004). The damage on Skull VI was described as \u201celongated, raking bite marks, isolated puncture bite marks, and perimortem breakage consistent with patterns of modern hyaenid bone modification\u201d (2004). Additionally, a fresh burnt equid cranium was discovered which supports the theory of mobile hominid scavenging and fire use at the site (2004).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Cormorant Garamond', serif;font-size: 1.602em;font-weight: bold\">Special Topic: Bog Bodies and Mummies<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Preservation is a key topic in anthropological research, since we can only study the evidence that gets left behind in the fossil and archaeological record. This chapter is concerned with the fossil record; however, there are other forms of preserved remains that provide anthropologists with information about the past. You\u2019ve undoubtedly heard of mummification, likely in the context of Egyptian or South American mummies. However, bog bodies and ice mummies are further examples of how remains can be preserved in special circumstances. It is important to note that fossilization is a process that takes much longer than the preservation of bog bodies or mummies.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 357px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/4\/44\/Tollundmannen.jpg\/250px-Tollundmannen.jpg\" alt=\"File:Tollundmannen.jpg\" width=\"357\" height=\"316\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.9: The head of the bog body known as the Tollund Man, discovered near Tollund, Silkeborg, Denmark, and dated to approximately 375\u2013174 BCE. Credit: <em data-start=\"303\" data-end=\"318\">Tollundmannen<\/em> by Sven Rosborn is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bog bodies are good examples of wetland preservation. Peat bogs are formed by the slow accumulation of vegetation and silts in ponds and lakes. Individuals were buried in bogs throughout Europe as far back as 10 kya, with a proliferation of activity from 1,600 to 3,200 years ago (Giles 2020; Ravn 2010). When they were found thousands of years later, they resembled recent burials. Their hair, skin, clothing, and organs were exceptionally well preserved, in addition to their bones and teeth (Eisenbeiss 2016; Ravn 2010). Preservation was so good in fact that archaeologists could identify the individuals\u2019 last meals and re-create tattoos found on their skin<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Extreme cold can also halt the natural decay process. A well-known ice mummy is \u00d6tzi, a Copper Age man dating to around 5,200 years ago found in the Alps (Vanzetti et al. 2012; Vidale Et al. 2016). As with the bog bodies, his hair, skin, clothing, and organs were all well preserved. Recently, archaeologists were able to identify his last meal (Maixner et al. 2018). It was high in fat, which makes sense considering the extremely cold environment in which he lived, as meals high in fat assist in cold tolerance (Fumagalli Et al. 2015).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In the Andes, ancient peoples would bury human sacrifices throughout the high peaks in a sacred ritual called Capacocha (Wilson Et al. 2007). The best-preserved mummy to date is called the \u201cMaiden\u201d or \u201cSarita\u201d because she was found at the summit of Sara Sara Volcano. Her remains are over 500 years old, but she still looks like the 15-year-old girl she was at the time of her death, as if she had just been sleeping for 500 years (Reinhard 2006).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Finally, arid environments can also contribute to the preservation of organic remains. As discussed with waterlogged sites, much of the bacteria that is active in breaking down bodies is already present in our gut and begins the putrefaction process shortly after death. Arid environments deplete organic material of the moisture that putrefactive bacteria need to function (Booth Et al. 2015). When that occurs, the soft tissue like skin, hair, and organs can be preserved. It is similar to the way a food dehydrator works to preserve meat, fruit, and vegetables for long-term storage. There are several examples of arid environments spontaneously preserving human remains, including catacomb burials in Austria and Italy (Aufderheide 2003).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fossilization<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fossils only represent a tiny fraction of creatures that existed in the past. It is extremely difficult for an organism to become a fossil. After all, organisms are designed to deteriorate after they die. Bacteria, insects, scavengers, weather, and environment all aid in the process that breaks down organisms so their elements can be returned to Earth to maintain ecosystems (Stodder 2008). <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_852\">Fossilization<\/a><\/strong>, therefore, is the preservation of an organism against these natural decay processes (Figure 8.10).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 699px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-2.png\" alt=\"Five images depicting fossilization.\" width=\"699\" height=\"345\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.10: A simplified illustration of the fossilization process beginning at an organism's death. In this example, the individual begins to decompose and then is covered by water and sediments, both protecting it and creating an environment for perimineralization. Sediments accumulate over time. Erosion eventually exposes the fossil, leading to its eventual discovery by paleoanthropologists. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Fossilization process (Figure 7.15)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">For fossilization to occur, several important things must happen. First, the organism must be protected from things like bacterial activity, scavengers, and temperature and moisture fluctuations. A stable environment is important. This means that the organism should not be exposed to significant fluctuations in temperature, humidity, and weather patterns. Changes to moisture and temperature cause the organic tissues to expand and contract repeatedly, which will eventually cause microfractures and break down (Stodder 2008). Soft tissue like organs, muscle, and skin are more easily broken down in the decay process; therefore, they are less likely to be preserved. Bones and teeth, however, last much longer and are more common in the fossil record (Williams 2004).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wetlands are a particularly good area for preservation because they allow for rapid permanent burial and a stable moisture environment. That is why many fossils are found in and around ancient lakes and river systems. Waterlogged sites can also be naturally <strong>anaerobic<\/strong> (without oxygen). Much of the bacteria that causes decay is already present in our gut and can begin the decomposition process shortly after death during putrefaction (Booth Et al. 2015). Since oxygen is necessary for the body\u2019s bacteria to break down organic material, the decay process is significantly slowed or halted in anaerobic conditions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The next step in the fossilization process is sediment accumulation. The sediments cover and protect the organism from the environment. They, along with water, provide the minerals that will eventually become the fossil (Williams 2004). Sediment accumulation also provides the pressure needed for mineralization to take place. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_856\">Lithification<\/a><\/strong> is when the weight and pressure of the sediments squeeze out extra fluids and replace the voids that appear with minerals from the surrounding sediments. Finally, we have <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_858\">permineralization<\/a><\/strong>. This is when the organism is fully replaced by minerals from the sediments. A fossil is really a mineral copy of the original organism (2004, 31).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Types of Fossils<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><em>Plants<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 259px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Petrified wood.\" width=\"259\" height=\"194\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.11: An exquisite piece of petrified wood. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:PetrifiedWood.jpg\">PetrifiedWood<\/a> at the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Petrified_Forest_National_Park\">Petrified Forest National Park<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/pdphoto.org\/\">Jon Sullivan<\/a> has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Plants make up the majority of fossilized materials. One of the most common plants existing today, the fern, has been found in fossilized form many times. Other plants that no longer exist or the early ancestors of modern plants come in fossilized forms as well. It is through these fossils that we can discover how plants evolved and learn about the climate of Earth over different periods of time.<\/p>\n<p>Another type of fossilized plant is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_860\">petrified wood<\/a><\/strong>. This fossil is created when actual pieces of wood\u2014such as the trunk of a tree\u2014mineralize and turn into rock. Petrified wood is a combination of silica, calcite, and quartz, and it is both heavy and brittle. Petrified wood can be colorful and is generally aesthetically pleasing because all the features of the original tree\u2019s composition are illuminated through mineralization (Figure 8.11). There are a number of places all over the world where petrified wood \u201cforests\u201d can be found, but there is an excellent assemblage in Arizona, at the Petrified Forest National Park. At this site, evidence relating to the environment of the area some 225 <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_862\">mya<\/a><\/strong> is on display.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><em>Human\/Animal Remains<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 242px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-1.jpg\" alt=\"Partial hominin skeleton on black background.\" width=\"242\" height=\"583\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.12: \u201cLucy\u201d (AL 288-1), Australopithecus afarensis. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lucy_blackbg.jpg\">Lucy blackbg<\/a> by 120 is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.5\/deed.en\">CC BY 2.5 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>We are more familiar with the fossils of early animals because natural history museums have exhibits of dinosaurs and extinct mammals. However, there are a number of fossilized hominin remains that provide a picture of the fossil record over the course of our evolution from primates. The term <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_800\">hominins<\/a><\/strong> includes all human ancestors who existed after the evolutionary split from chimpanzees and bonobos, some six to seven mya. Modern humans are <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, but hominins can include much earlier versions of humans. One such hominin is \u201cLucy\u201d (AL 288-1), the 3.2 million-year-old fossil of <em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em> that was discovered in Ethiopia in 1974 (Figure 8.12). Until recently, Lucy was the most complete and oldest hominin fossil, with 40% of her skeleton preserved (see Chapter 9 for more information about Lucy). In 1994, an <em>Australopithecus<\/em> fossil nicknamed \u201cLittle Foot\u201d (Stw 573) was located in the World Heritage Site at Sterkfontein Caves (\u201cthe Cradle of Humankind\u201d) in South Africa. Little Foot is more complete than Lucy and possibly the oldest fossil that has so far been found, dating to at least 3.6 million years (Granger Et al. 2015). The ankle bones of the fossil were extricated from the matrix of concrete-like rock, revealing that the bones of the ankles and feet indicate bipedalism (University of Witwatersrand 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Both the Lucy and Little Foot fossils date back to the Pliocene (5.8 to 2.3 mya). Older hominin fossils from the late Miocene (7.25 to 5.5 mya) have been located, although they are much less complete. The oldest hominin fossil is a fragmentary skull named <em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em>, found in Northern Chad and dating to circa seven mya (Lebatard Et al. 2008). It is through the discovery, dating, and study of primate and early hominin fossils that we find physical evidence of the evolutionary timeline of humans.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Asphalt<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28.jpg\" alt=\"Asphalt lake with mammoth figurines.\" width=\"510\" height=\"340\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.13: This is a recreation of how animals tragically came to be trapped in the asphalt lake at the La Brea Tar Pits. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Mammoth_Tragedy_at_La_Brea_Tar_Pits_(5463657162).jpg\">Mammoth Tragedy at La Brea Tar Pits (5463657162)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/81943113@N00\">KimonBerlin<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 206px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-3.jpg\" alt=\"Skull with open jaw and large teeth.\" width=\"206\" height=\"245\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.14: The fearsome jaws of the saber-toothed cat (Smilodon fatalis) found at the La Brea Tar Pits. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/jsjgeology\/15256884929\">Smilodon saber-toothed tiger skull (La Brea Asphalt, Upper Pleistocene; Rancho La Brea tar pits, southern California, USA) 1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/jsjgeology\/\">James St. John<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Asphalt, a form of crude oil, can also yield fossilized remains. Asphalt is commonly referred to in error as tar because of its viscous nature and dark color. A famous fossil site from California is La Brea Tar Pits in downtown Los Angeles (Figure 8.13). In the middle of the busy city on Wilshire Boulevard, asphalt (not tar) bubbles up through seeps (cracks) in the sidewalk. The La Brea Tar Pits Museum provides an incredible look at the both extinct and extant animals that lived in the Los Angeles Basin 40,000\u201311,000 years ago. These animals became entrapped in the asphalt during the Pleistocene and perished in place. Ongoing excavations have yielded millions of fossils, including <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_864\">megafauna<\/a><\/strong> such as American mastodons and incomplete skeletons of extinct species of dire wolves, <em>Canis dirus<\/em>, and the saber-toothed cat, <em>Smilodon fatalis<\/em> (Figure 8.14). Fossilized remains of plants have also been found in the asphalt. The remains of one person have also been found at the tar pits. Referred to as La Brea Woman, the remains were found in 1914 and were subsequently dated to around 10,250 years ago. The La Brea Woman was a likely female individual who was 17\u201328 years old at the time of her death, with a height of under five feet (Spray 2022). She is thought to have died from blunt force trauma to her head, famously making her Los Angeles\u2019s first documented homicide victim (Spray 2022). (Learn more about her in the Special Topic box, \u201cNecropolitics,\u201d below.) Between the fossils of animals and those of plants, paleontologists have a good idea of the way the Los Angeles Basin looked and what the climate in the area was like many thousands of years ago.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Igneous Rock<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Most fossils are found in sedimentary rock. This type of rock has been formed from deposits of minerals over millions of years in bodies of water on Earth\u2019s surface. Some examples include shale, limestone, and siltstone. Sedimentary rock typically has a layered appearance. However, fossils have been found in igneous rock as well. Igneous rock is volcanic rock that is created from cooled molten lava. It is rare for fossils to survive molten lava, and it is estimated that only 2% of all fossils have been found in igneous rock (Ingber 2012). Part of a giant rhinocerotid skull dating back 9.2 mya to the Miocene was discovered in Cappadocia, Turkey, in 2010. The fossil was a remarkable find because the eruption of the \u00c7ardak caldera was so sudden that it simply dehydrated and \u201cbaked\u201d the animal (Antoine Et al. 2012).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Trace Fossils<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Depending on the specific circumstances of weather and time, even footprints can become fossilized. Footprints fall into the category of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_866\">trace fossils<\/a><\/strong>, which includes other evidence of biological activity such as nests, burrows, tooth marks, and shells. A well-known example of trace fossils are the Laetoli footprints in Tanzania (Figure 8.15). More recently, archaeological investigations in North America have revealed fossil footprints which rewrite the history of people in the Americas at White Sands, New Mexico. You can read more about the Laetoli and White Sands footprints in the Dig Deeper box below.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 399px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-2.jpg\" alt=\"Uneven rock surface with footprints. \" width=\"399\" height=\"245\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.15: A few early hominin footprints fossilized at Laetoli. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:NHM_-_Laetoli_Fu%C3%9Fspuren.jpg\">NHM - Laetoli Fu\u00dfspuren<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Xenophon\">Wolfgang Sauber<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Other fossilized footprints have been discovered around the world. At Pech Merle cave in the Dordogne region of France, archaeologists discovered two fossilized footprints. They then brought in indigenous trackers from Namibia to look for other footprints. The approach worked, as many other footprints belonging to as many as five individuals were discovered with the expert eyes of the trackers (Pastoors Et al. 2017). These footprints date back 12,000 years (Granger Historical Picture Archive 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Some of the more unappealing but still-fascinating trace fossils are bezoars and coprolite. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_868\">Bezoars<\/a><\/strong> are hard, concrete-like substances found in the intestines of fossilized creatures. Bezoars start off like the hair balls that cats and rabbits accumulate from grooming, but they become hard, concrete-like substances in the intestines. If an animal with a hairball dies before expelling the hair ball mass <em>and <\/em>the organism becomes fossilized, that mass becomes a bezoar.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_870\">Coprolite<\/a><\/strong> is fossilized dung. One of the best collections of coprolites is affectionately known as the \u201cPoozeum.\u201d The collection includes a huge coprolite named \u201cPrecious\u201d (Figure 8.16). Coprolite, like all fossilized materials, can be <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_872\">in matrix<\/a><\/strong>\u2014meaning that the fossil is embedded in secondary rock. As unpleasant as it may seem to work with coprolites, remember that the organic material in dung has mineralized or has started to mineralize; therefore, it is no longer soft and is generally not smelly. Also, just as a doctor can tell a lot about health and diet from a stool sample, anthropologists can glean a great deal of information from coprolite about the diets of ancient animals and the environment in which the food sources existed. For instance, 65 million-year-old grass <em>phytoliths<\/em> (microscopic silica in plants) found in dinosaur coprolite in India revealed that grasses had been in existence much earlier than scientists initially believed (Taylor &amp; O\u2019Dea 2014, 133).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 312px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Piece of fossilized poop.\" width=\"312\" height=\"224\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.16: An extremely large coprolite named \u201cPrecious.\u201d Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Precious_the_Coprolite_Courtesy_of_the_Poozeum.jpg\">Precious the Coprolite Courtesy of the Poozeum<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/poozeum.com\">Poozeum<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Pseudofossils<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_874\">Pseudofossils<\/a><\/strong> are not to be mistaken for fake fossils, which have vexed scientists from time to time. A fake fossil is an item that is deliberately manipulated or manufactured to mislead scientists and the general public. In contrast, pseudofossils are not misrepresentations but rather misinterpretations of rocks that look like true fossilized remains (S. Brubaker, personal communication, March 9, 2018). Pseudofossils are the result of impressions or markings on rock, or even the way other inorganic materials react with the rock. A common example is dendrites, the crystallized deposits of black minerals that resemble plant growth (Figure 8.17). Other examples of pseudofossils are unusual or odd-shaped rocks that include various concretions and nodules. An expert can examine a potential fossil to see if there is the requisite internal structure of organic material such as bone or wood that would qualify the item as a fossil.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 426px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29.jpg\" alt=\"Rock with black branching fractal veins.\" width=\"426\" height=\"284\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.17: A beautiful example of dendrites, a type of pseudofossil. It\u2019s easy to see how the black crystals look like plant growth. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Dendrites (Figure 7.25)<\/a> from the <a href=\"https:\/\/maturango.org\/\">Maturango Museum<\/a>, Ridgecrest, California, by Sarah S. King and Lee Anne Zajicek is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: \u00a0The Power of Poop<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Coprolites found in Paisley Caves, Oregon, in the United States are shedding new light on some of the earliest occupants in North America. Human coprolites are distinguished from animal coprolites through the identification of fecal biomarkers using lipids, or fats, and bile acids (Shillito Et al. 2020a). Paisley Caves have 16,000 years of anthropogenic, or human-caused, deposition, with some coprolites having been dated as old as 12.8kya (Blong Et al. 2020). Over 285 radiocarbon dates have been recorded from the site (Shillito et al. 2020a), making Paisley Caves one of the most well-dated archaeological sites in the United States. Coprolite analysis can be summarized in three levels, macroscopic, microscopic, and molecular. This can also be understood as analyzing the morphology (macroscopic), contents (microscopic), and residues (molecular) (Shillito Et al. 2020b). Each of these levels adds a different layer of information. Coprolite shape is informative through what can be seen macroscopically, such as ingestions of basketry or cordage, small gravels and grains, and general shape. The contents of coprolites may be of the most interest to scientists because certain plants and animals can signal past environments as well as food procurement methods. Coprolites from Paisley Caves have included small pebbles and obsidian chips from butchering game, grinding plants, and general food preparation as well as small bits of fire cracked rock likely from cooking in hearths (Blong 2020). Additionally, rodent bones in coprolites included crania and vertebrae, which suggests whole consumption (Taylor Et al. 2020). Insect remains are present in the coprolites as well, such as ants, Jerusalem crickets, June beetles, and darkling beetles (Blong 2020). In all, the coprolites of Paisley Caves have provided an invaluable resource to anthropologists to study the past climate and lifeways of early humans in the Americas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Coprolites can also signal past health, which is a study known as paleopathology. A study by Katelyn McDonough and colleagues (2022) focused on the identification of parasites in coprolites at Bonneville Estates Rockshelter in eastern Nevada and their link to the greater Great Basin during the Archaic, a period of time spanning 8,000\u20135,000 years ago. According to the study, parasites such as Acanthocephalans (thorny-headed worms) have been affecting the Great Basin for at least the last 10,000 years. Acanthocephalans are endoparasites, meaning parasites that live inside of their hosts. They are found worldwide and seem to have been concentrated in the Great Basin in the past. Bonneville Estates Rockshelter has been visited by humans for over 13,000 years, with parasite identification going back to nearly 7,000 years. The species identified at Bonneville Estates is <em>Moniliformis clarki<\/em>. This species parasitizes crickets and insects, a popular food source during the Archaic in the Great Basin. The parasite uses intermediate hosts to get to mammals and birds as definitive hosts. Crickets and beetles have been recorded as food materials in Paisley Caves as well. Insects have remained an important dietary staple for people of the Great Basin and are consumed raw, dried, brined, or ground into flour. Insects that remain uncooked or undercooked have a higher risk for transmission of parasites. Symptoms associated with Acanthocephalans infection are intense intestinal discomfort, anemia, and anorexia, leading to death. It is hypothesized that the consumption of basketry, cordage, and charcoal (which was also identified at Paisley Caves), sometimes associated with parasite-infected coprolites, may have been a method of treatment for the infection. Interestingly, present day infections from this parasite are rising after remaining quite rare, as detection of the parasite is occurring in insect farms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Walking to the Past<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1974, British anthropologist Mary Leakey discovered fossilized animal tracks at Laetoli (Figure 8.18), not far from the important paleoanthropological site at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. A few years later, a 27-meter trail of hominin footprints were discovered at the same site. These 70 footprints, now referred to as the Laetoli Footprints, were created when early humans walked in wet volcanic ash. Before the impressions were obscured, more volcanic ash and rain fell, sealing the footprints. These series of environmental events were truly extraordinary, but they fortunately resulted in some of the most famous and revealing trace fossils ever found. Dating of the footprints indicate that they were made 3.6 mya (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History 2018).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 495px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-1-1.png\" alt=\"Eastern Africa map shows sites within Tanzania.\" width=\"495\" height=\"382\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.18: Location of Laetoli site in Tanzania, Africa, with Olduvai Gorge nearby. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Laetoli and Olduvai Gorge sites (Figure 7.26)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Just as forensic scientists can use footprints to identify the approximate build of a potential suspect in a crime, archaeologists have read the Laetoli Footprints for clues to these early humans. The footprints clearly indicate bipedal hominins who had similar feet to those of modern humans. Analysis of the gait through computer simulation revealed that the hominins at Laetoli walked similarly to the way we walk today (Crompton 2012). More recent analyses confirm the similarity to modern humans but also indicate a gait that involved more of a flexed limb than that of modern humans (Hatala Et al. 2016; Raichlen &amp; Gordon 2017). The relatively short stride implies that these hominins had short legs\u2014unlike the longer legs of later early humans who migrated out of Africa (Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History 2018). In the context of Olduvai Gorge, where fossils of <em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em> have been located and dated to the same timeframe as the footprints, it is likely that these newly discovered impressions were left by these same hominins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The footprints at Laetoli were made by a small group of as many as three <em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em>, walking in close proximity, not unlike what we would see on a modern street or sidewalk. Two trails of footprints have been positively identified with the third set of prints appearing smaller and set in the tracks left by one of the larger individuals. While scientific methods have given us the ability to date the footprints and understand the body mechanics of the hominin, additional consideration of the footprints can lead to other implications. For instance, the close proximity of the individuals implies a close relationship existed between them, not unlike that of a family. Due to the size variation and the depth of impression, the footprints seem to have been made by two larger adults and possibly one child. Scientists theorize that the weight being carried by one of the larger individuals is a young child or a baby (Masao Et al. 2016). Excavation continues at Laetoli today, resulting in the discovery of two more footprints in 2015, also believed to have been made by <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> (2016).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 482px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10.jpg\" alt=\"Map shows Tularosa Basin.\" width=\"482\" height=\"331\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.19: Tularosa Basin, New Mexico. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:HUC1305.jpg\">Map of Tularosa Basin<\/a> by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/\">United States Geological Survey<\/a> is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>But it is not just human evolution studies that can benefit from the analysis of fossil footprints. A recent discovery of fossilized footprints has rewritten what we know about the peopling of the Americas. It was originally thought that humans had been in the Americas for at least the last 15,000 years by crossing through the ice-free corridor (IFC) between the Cordilleran and Laurentide ice sheets in present-day Alaska and Canada. However, fossil footprints from the Tularosa Basin of New Mexico (see Figure 8.19) discovered in 2021 have challenged this theory. The footprints, dated between 22,860 (\u2213320) and 21,130 (\u2213250) years ago (nps.gov) based on <em>Ruppia cirrhosa <\/em>grass seeds located above and below the footprints, have shown humans have been in the Americas for much longer than previously thought. These footprints represent an adolescent individual and toddler walking through the lakebed at White Sands (see Figure 8.20), New Mexico, alongside both giant ground sloths and mammoths (Barras 2022; Wade 2021). Also present in the lakebed are footprints of camels and dire wolves (nps.gov 2022; Wade 2021).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 789px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image31-1.png\" alt=\"Archaeologists on ground. Excavation with footprints. Closeups of footprints.\" width=\"789\" height=\"594\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.20: Excavation of fossil footprints from New Mexico. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/programs\/climate-research-and-development-program\/news\/discovery-ancient-human-footprints-white\">Images of White Sands National Park Study Site Footprints<\/a> by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/programs\/climate-research-and-development-program\">USGS Climate Research and Development Program<\/a> is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The IFC model was upheld by a group of theorists known as \u201cClovis First,\u201d who believed the migration of people into the Americas was recent and was represented archaeologically through the Clovis projectile point toolkit. Subsequent discoveries at sites such as Cactus Hill on the east coast of the United States and Monte Verde, Chile, have demonstrated that this model wouldn\u2019t have worked. Because these sites are as old as 20,000 years and 18,500 years respectively, the IFC would have been frozen over and impassable (Gruhn 2020). Other models have been adopted to account for this, such as the coastal migration model down the west coast of North America. The more-likely migration scenario seems to be neither of these as more discoveries or antiquity continue to emerge. People may instead have migrated into the Americas before the last glacial maximum began, around 25,500\u201319,000 years ago. According to Indigenous knowledge, they have always been here. With the discovery of the White Sands footprints, it is known that humans have been in the Americas for at least 20,000 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">This discovery also reveals the importance of recognizing knowledge beyond that which is produced by the European scientific tradition. Rather than framing science in a way that runs counter to Indigenous knowledge, it can be thought that science is catching up with it. For instance, the Acoma Pueblo people have the word for <em>camel<\/em> in their vocabulary. This was dismissed by scientists who assumed the word was for describing camels that were introduced to the United States in the past 100 years. However, the discovery of the White Sands footprints also included the footprints of Pleistocene camels in the same strata. Therefore, the fact that the Acoma Pueblo people have had a word for <em>camel<\/em> likely refers the Pleistocene-age megafauna camel, <em>Camelops hesternus,<\/em> rather than <em>Camelus dromedarius<\/em> or <em>Camelus bactrianus<\/em>, two present-day camel species (which are actually descendants of <em>Camelops hesternus<\/em>). Therefore, the existence of the Acoma Pueblo word for <em>camel <\/em>is not like an anomaly but rather a testament to the fact that Acoma Pueblo ancestors walked beside <em>C. hesternus<\/em> on this continent 20,000 years ago. These footprints challenge the \u201cice-free corridor\u201d expansion model, as the bridge connecting present-day Alaska and Russia into Canada would have been covered in an impenetrable ice sheet at this time. The discovery of these footprints urges scientists to reconsider further investigations at well-known Terminal Pleistocene\/Early Holocene dry lake beds in the Southwestern and Mojave deserts\u2014and to include Indigenous knowledge in their work rather than ignore it.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Cormorant Garamond', serif;font-size: 1.602em;font-weight: bold\">Special Topic: Necropolitics<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What are necropolitics? Necropolitics is an application of critical theory that describes how \u201cgovernments assign differential value to human life\u201d and similarly how someone is treated after they die (Verghese 2021). How is someone\u2019s death political?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Consider the La Brea Woman example from the section on asphalt above. The La Brea Woman\u2019s discovery was controversial, not because she is the only person to be found in the tar pits or because of her age but also because of necropolitics. The La Brea Woman was collected in 1914 and her body was housed on display at the George C. Page Museum in Los Angeles against the wishes of the Chumash and the Tongva, two tribes whose ancestral lands include Los Angeles. The museum decided to display a skull cast instead to meet the request of the tribes which included a separate postcranial skeleton from a different individual. The updated display itself was wrought with other ethical issues, as a cast of her skull was \u201cattached to the ancient remains of a Pakistani female that was dyed dark bronze, the femurs shortened to approximate the stature of native people\u201d (Cooper 2010). In both cases, neither the individuals or their descendent communities consented to the display or grotesque modification of human remains. According to an interview conducted by LA Weekly (Cooper 2010) with Cindi Alvitre, former chair of the Gabrielino-Tongva Tribal Council, the display of Indigenous human remains is akin to voyeurism. She states \u201cIt's disheartening to me because it's very inappropriate to display any human remains. The things we do to fill the imagination of visitors. It violates human rights.\u201d It is important to listen to the wishes of Indigenous people and center their values when conducting work with their ancestors. A good source for considering places to look for archaeological research ethics before conducting fieldwork (and ideally during your research design) is the Canadian Archaeology Association's <em>Principals of Ethical Conduct<\/em>, as well as following the Indigenous Archaeology Collective.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Indigenous remains are now protected in the United States due to legislation such as Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). You can read more about this in Chapter 15: Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology. Before the passing of NAGPRA, tribes had little agency over how the bodies of their ancestors were treated by anthropologists and museums, including decisions about sampling and destructive tests. Now when archaeological field work is conducted on federal land, tribes must be consulted before work begins. This consultation process often includes what to do if human remains are encountered. Indigenous tribes are multifaceted and multivocal; each has its own rules about how to handle the remains of their ancestors. In some cases, all work on the project must be halted after the discovery of human remains. Other tribes allow for work to continue if the remains are moved and reburied. Some tribes are open to radiometric dating if it aligns with their beliefs in the afterlife. Each tribe is different, and each tribe deserves to have its wishes respected.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Voices From the Past: What Fossils Can Tell Us<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Given that so few organisms ever become fossilized, any anthropologist or fossil hunter will tell you that finding a fossil is extremely exciting. But this is just the beginning of a fantastic mystery. With the creative application of scientific methods and deductive reasoning, a great deal can be learned about the fossilized organism and the environment in which it lived, leading to enhanced understanding of the world around us.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Dating Methods<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Context is a crucial concept in paleoanthropology and archaeology. Objects and fossils are interesting in and of themselves, but without context there is only so much we can learn from them. One of the most important contextual pieces is the dating of an object or fossil. By being able to place it in time, we can compare it more accurately with other contemporary fossils and artifacts or we can better analyze the evolution of a fossil species or artifacts. To answer the question \u201cHow do we know what we know?,\u201d you have to know how archaeologists and paleoanthropologists establish dates for artifacts, fossils, and sites.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Though accurate dating is important for context and analysis, we must consider the impact. Many of the chronometric dating methods used by anthropologists require the removal of small samples from artifacts, bones, soils, and rock. Thus these techniques are considered destructive. How much of an artifact are you willing to destroy to get your date? Sharon Clough, a Senior Environmental Officer at Cotswold Archaeology, addressed this issue in a case study from her research. She stated that \u201cthe benefit of a date did not outweigh the destruction of a valuable and finite resource\u201d (Clough 2020). The resource in question was human remains. When considering our dating options, we want to be sure that we do as little harm as possible, especially in the case of human remains (read more about this issue in the Special Topic box, \u201cNecropolitics\u201d).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dating techniques are divided into two broad categories: relative dating methods and chronometric (sometimes called absolute) dating methods.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Relative Dating<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_876\">Relative dating<\/a><\/strong> methods are used first because they rely on simple observational skills. In the 1820s, Christian J\u00fcrgensen Thomsen at the National Museum of Denmark in Copenhagen developed the \u201cthree-age\u201d system still used in European archaeology today (Feder 2017, 17). He categorized the artifacts at the museum based on the idea that simpler tools and materials were most likely older than more complex tools and materials. Stone tools must predate metal tools because they do not require special technology to develop. Copper and bronze tools must predate iron because they can be smelted or worked at lower temperatures, etc. Based on these observations, he categorized the artifacts into Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The restriction of relative dating is that you don\u2019t know specific dates or how much time passed between different sites or artifacts. You simply know that one artifact or fossil is older than another. Thomsen knew that Stone Age artifacts were older than Bronze Age artifacts, but he couldn\u2019t tell if they were hundreds of years older or thousands of years older. The same is true with fossils that have differences of ages into the hundreds of millions of years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The first relative dating technique is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_878\">stratigraphy<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 8.21). You might have already heard this term if you have watched documentaries on archaeological excavations. That\u2019s because this method is still being used today. It provides a solid foundation for other dating techniques and gives important context to artifacts and fossils found at a site.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 382px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-1.png\" alt=\"Stratigraphic cross-section with 12 strata.\" width=\"382\" height=\"662\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.21: An illustration of a stratigraphic cross-section. The objects at a lower strata are older than the one above. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Stratigraphic cross-section (Figure 7.28)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stratigraphy is based on the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_880\">Law of Superposition<\/a><\/strong> first proposed by Nicholas Steno in 1669 and further explored by James Hutton (the previously mentioned \u201cFather\u201d of Deep Time). Essentially, superposition tells us that things on the bottom are older than things on the top (Williams 2004, 28). Notice on Figure 8.21 that there are distinctive layers piled on top of each other. It stands to reason that each layer is older than the one immediately on top of it (Hester Et al. 1997, 338). Think of a pile of laundry on the floor. Over the course of a week, as dirty clothes get tossed on that pile, the shirt tossed down on Monday will be at the bottom of the pile while the shirt tossed down on Friday will be at the top. Assuming that the laundry pile was undisturbed throughout the week, if the clothes were picked up layer by layer, the clothing choices that week could be reconstructed in the order that they were worn.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another relative dating technique is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_882\">biostratigraphy<\/a><\/strong>. This form of dating looks at the context of a fossil or artifact and compares it to the other fossils and biological remains (plant and animal) found in the same stratigraphic layers. For instance, if an artifact is found in the same layer as wooly mammoth remains, you know that it must date to around the last ice age, when wooly mammoths were still abundant on Earth. In the absence of more specific dating techniques, early archaeologists could prove the great antiquity of stone tools because of their association with extinct animals. The application of this relative dating technique in archaeology was used at the Folsom site in New Mexico. In 1927, a stone spear point was discovered embedded in the rib of an extinct species of bison. Because of the undeniable association between the artifact and the ancient animal, there was scientific evidence that people had occupied the North American continent since antiquity (Cook 1928).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Similar to biostratigraphic dating is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_884\">cultural dating<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 8.22). This relative dating technique is used to identify the chronological relationships between human-made artifacts. Cultural dating is based on artifact types and styles (Hester Et al. 1997, 338). For instance, a pocket knife by itself is difficult to date. However, if the same pocket knife is discovered surrounded by cassette tapes and VHS tapes, it is logical to assume that the artifact came from the late 20th century like the cassette and VHS tapes. The pocket knife could not be dated earlier than the late 20th century because the tapes were made no earlier than 1977. In the Thomsen example above, he was able to identify a relative chronology of ancient European tools based on the artifact styles, manufacturing techniques, and raw materials. Cultural dating can be used with any human-made artifacts. Both cultural dating and biostratigraphy are most effective when researchers are already familiar with the time periods for the artifacts and animals. They are still used today to identify general time periods for sites.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 364px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26-1.png\" alt=\"Ax heads, swords, circlets, and pots by type.\" width=\"364\" height=\"557\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.22: Charts of typology, like these representing items from the Bronze Age, are used to classify artifacts and illustrate cultural material assemblages. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/wellcomecollection.org\/works\/de5rxx5a\">Bronze Age implements, ornaments and pottery (Period II)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/wellcomecollection.org\/\">Wellcome Collection<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/#_ga=2.5144115.1054155377.1564173886-467226638.1563307053\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Chemical dating was developed in the 19th century and represents one of the early attempts to use soil composition and chemistry to date artifacts. A specific type of chemical dating is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_886\">fluorine dating<\/a><\/strong>, and it is commonly used to compare the age of the soil around bone, antler, and teeth located in close proximity (Cook &amp; Ezra-Cohn 1959; Goodrum &amp; Olson 2009). While this technique is based on chemical dating, it only provides the relative dates of items rather than their absolute ages. For this reason, fluorine dating is considered a hybrid form of relative and chronometric dating methods (which will be discussed next).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Soils contain different amounts of chemicals, and those chemicals, such as fluorine, can be absorbed by human and animal bones buried in the soil. The longer the remains are in the soil, the more fluorine they will absorb (Cook &amp; Ezra-Cohn 1959; Goodrum &amp; Olson 2009). A sample of the bone or antler can be processed and measured for its fluorine content. Unfortunately, this absorption rate is highly sensitive to temperature, soil pH, and varying fluorine levels in local soil and groundwater (Goodrum &amp; Olson 2009; Haddy &amp; Hanson 1982). This makes it difficult to get an accurate date for the remains or to compare remains between two sites. However, this technique is particularly useful for determining whether different artifacts come from the same burial context. If they were buried in the same soil for the same length of time, their fluorine signatures would match.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Chronometric Dating<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Unlike relative dating methods, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_888\">chronometric dating<\/a><\/strong> methods provide specific dates and time ranges. Many of the chronometric techniques we will discuss are based on work in other disciplines such as chemistry and physics. The modern developments in studying radioactive materials are accurate and precise in establishing dates for ancient sites and remains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Many of the chronometric dating methods are based on the measurement of radioactive decay of particular <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_890\">Elements<\/a>.<\/strong>\u00a0Each element consists of an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_892\">atom<\/a><\/strong> that has a specific number of protons (positively charged particles) and electrons (negatively charged particles) as well as varying numbers of neutrons (particles with no charge). The protons and neutrons are located in the densely compacted nucleus of the atom, but the majority of the volume of an atom is space outside the nucleus around which the electrons orbit (see Figure 8.23).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 285px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-1-1.png\" alt=\"Atom labeled with nucleus, proton, neutron, and electron.\" width=\"285\" height=\"285\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.23: Simplified illustration of an atom. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Atom%20Diagram.svg\">Atom Diagram<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:AG_Caesar\">AG Caesar<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Elements are classified based on the number of protons in the nucleus. For example, carbon has six protons, giving it an atomic number 6. Uranium has 92 protons, which means that it has an atomic number 92. While the number of protons in the atom of an element do not vary, the number of neutrons may. Atoms of a given element that have different numbers of neutrons are known as <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_894\">isotopes<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The majority of an atom\u2019s mass is determined by the protons and neutrons, which have more than a thousand times the mass of an electron. Due to the different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus, isotopes vary by nuclear\/atomic weight (Brown et al. 2018, 94). For instance, isotopes of carbon include carbon 12 (<sup>12<\/sup>C), carbon 13 (<sup>13<\/sup>C), and carbon 14 (<sup>14<\/sup>C). Carbon always has six protons, but <sup>12<\/sup>C has six neutrons whereas <sup>14<\/sup>C has eight neutrons. Because <sup>14<\/sup>C has more neutrons, it has a greater mass than <sup>12<\/sup>C (Brown Et al. 2018, 95).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Most isotopes in nature are considered <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_896\">stable isotopes<\/a><\/strong> and will remain in their normal structure indefinitely. However, some isotopes are considered <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_898\">unstable isotopes<\/a><\/strong> (sometimes called radioisotopes) because they spontaneously release energy and particles, transforming into stable isotopes (Brown Et al. 2018, 946; Flowers Et al. 2018, section 21.1). The process of transforming the atom by spontaneously releasing energy is called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_900\">radioactive decay<\/a><\/strong>. This change occurs at a predictable rate for nearly all radioisotopes of elements, allowing scientists to use unstable isotopes to measure time passage from a few hundred to a few billion years with a large degree of accuracy and precision.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The leading chronometric method for archaeology is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_902\">radiocarbon dating<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 8.24). This method is based on the decay of <sup>14<\/sup>C, which is an unstable isotope of carbon. It is created when nitrogen 14 (<sup>14<\/sup>N) interacts with cosmic rays, which causes it to capture a neutron and convert to <sup>14<\/sup>C. Carbon 14 in our atmosphere is absorbed by plants during photosynthesis, a process by which light energy is turned into chemical energy to sustain life in plants, algae, and some bacteria. Plants absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and use the energy from light to convert it into sugar that fuels the plant (Campbell &amp; Reece 2005, 181\u2013200). Though <sup>14<\/sup>C is an unstable isotope, plants can use it in the same way that they use the stable isotopes of carbon.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 514px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27.png\" alt=\"Creation of Carbon 14.\" width=\"514\" height=\"658\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.24: A graphic illustrating how 14C is created in the atmosphere, is absorbed by living organisms, and ends up in the archaeological record. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Radiocarbon dating (Figure 7.32)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Animals get <sup>14<\/sup>C by eating the plants. Humans take it in by eating plants and animals. After death, organisms stop taking in new carbon, and the unstable <sup>14<\/sup>C will begin to decay. Carbon 14 has a half-life of 5,730 years (Hester Et al. 1997, 324). That means that in 5,730 years, half the amount of <sup>14<\/sup>C will convert back into <sup>14<\/sup>N. Because the pattern of radioactive decay is so reliable, we can use <sup>14<\/sup>C to accurately date sites up to 55,000 years old (Hajdas Et al. 2021). However, <sup>14<\/sup>C can only be used on the remains of biological organisms. This includes charcoal, shell, wood, plant material, and bone. This method involves destroying a small sample of the material. Earlier methods of radiocarbon dating required at least 1 gram of material, but with the introduction of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), sample sizes as small as 1 milligram can now be used (Hajdas Et al. 2021). This significantly reduces the destructive nature of this method.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As mentioned before, <sup>14<\/sup>C is unstable and ultimately decays back into <sup>14<\/sup>N. This decay is happening at a constant rate (even now, inside your own body!). However, as long as an organism is alive and taking in food, <sup>14<\/sup>C is being replenished in the body. As soon as an organism dies, it no longer takes in new <sup>14<\/sup>C. We can then use the rate of decay to measure how long it has been since the organism died (Hester Et al. 1997, 324). However, the amount of <sup>14<\/sup>C in the atmosphere is not stable over time. It fluctuates based on changes to the earth\u2019s magnetic field and solar activity. In order to turn <sup>14<\/sup>C results into accurate calendar years, they must be calibrated using data from other sources. For example, annual tree rings (see discussion of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_904\">dendrochronology<\/a><\/strong> below), <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_906\">foraminifera<\/a><\/strong> from stratified marine sediments, and microfossils from lake sediments can be used to chart the changes in <sup>14<\/sup>C as \u201ccalibration curves.\u201d The radiocarbon date obtained from the sample is compared to the established curve and then adjusted to reflect a more accurate calendar date (see Figure 8.25). The curves are updated over time with more data so that we can continue to refine radiocarbon dates (T\u00f6rnqvist Et al. 2016). The most recent calibration curves were released in 2020 and may change the dates for some existing sites by hundreds of years (Jones 2020).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 547px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-2.jpg\" alt=\"Radiocarbon date calibration curve. \" width=\"547\" height=\"384\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.25: This is a simplified example of a calibration curve, showing how the radiocarbon age (y axis) is compared with the calibration curve to produce calibrated dates (x axis). <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Radiocarbon_Date_Calibration_Curve.svg\">Radiocarbon Date Calibration Curve<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:HowardMorland\">HowardMorland<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>. [Based on information from Reimer et al. 2004. Radiocarbon 46: 1029-58.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_908\">Potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating<\/a><\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_910\">argon-argon (Ar-Ar) dating<\/a><\/strong> can reach further back into the past than radiocarbon dating. Used to date volcanic rock, these techniques are based on the decay of unstable potassium 40 (<sup>40<\/sup>K) into argon 40 (<sup>40<\/sup>Ar) gas, which gets trapped in the crystalline structures of volcanic material. It is a method of indirect dating. Instead of dating the fossil itself, K-Ar and Ar-Ar dates volcanic layers around the fossil. It will tell you when the volcanic eruption that deposited the layers occurred. This is where stratigraphy becomes important. The date of the surrounding layers can give you a minimum and maximum age of the fossil based on where it is in relation to those layers. The benefit of this dating technique is that <sup>40<\/sup>K has a half-life of circa 1.3 billion years, so it can be used on sites as young as 100 kya and as old as the age of Earth.\u00a0Another benefit to this technique is that it does not damage precious fossils because the samples are taken from the surrounding rock instead. However, this method is not without its flaws. A study by J. G. Funkhouser and colleagues (1966) and Raymond Bradley (2015) demonstrated that igneous rocks with fluid inclusions, such as those found in Hawai\u2018i, can release gasses including radiogenic argon when crushed, leading to incorrectly older dates. This is an example of why it is important to use multiple dating methods in research to detect anomalies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_912\">Uranium series dating<\/a><\/strong> is based on the decay chain of unstable isotopes of uranium. It uses mass spectrometry to detect the ratios of uranium 238 (<sup>238<\/sup>U), uranium 234(<sup>234<\/sup>U), and thorium 230 (<sup>230<\/sup>Th) in carbonates (Wendt et al. 2021). Thorium accumulates in the carbonate sample through radiometric decay. Thus, the age of the sample is calculated from the difference between a known initial ratio and the ratio present in the sample to be dated. This makes uranium series ideal for dating carbonate rich deposits such as carbonate cements from glacial moraine deposits, speleothems (deposits of secondary minerals that form on the walls, floors, and ceilings of caves, like stalactites and stalagmites), marine and lacustrine carbonates from corals, caliche, and tufa, as well as bones and teeth (University of Arizona, n.d.; van Calsteren &amp; Thomas 2006). Due to the timing of the decay process, this dating technique can be used from a few years up to 650k (Wendt Et al. 2021). Since many early hominin sites occur in cave environments, this dating technique can be very powerful. This method has also been used to develop more accurate calibration curves for radiocarbon dating. However, the accuracy of this method depends on knowing the initial ratios of the elements and ruling out possible contamination (Wendt Et al. 2021). It also involves the destruction of a small sample of material.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_914\">Fission track dating<\/a> <\/strong>is another useful dating technique for sites that are millions of years old. This is based on the decay of radioactive uranium 238 (<sup>238<\/sup>U). The unstable atom of <sup>238<\/sup>U fissions at a predictable rate. The fission takes a lot of energy and causes damage to the surrounding rock. For instance, in volcanic glasses we can see this damage as trails in the glass. Researchers in the lab take a sample of the glass and count the number of fission trails using an optical microscope. As <sup>238<\/sup>U has a half-life of 4,500 million years, it can be used to date rock and mineral material starting at just a few decades and extending back to the age of Earth. As with K-Ar, archaeologists are not dating artifacts directly. They are dating the layers around the artifacts in which they are interested (Laurenzi Et al. 2007).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_916\">Luminescence dating<\/a><\/strong>, which includes thermoluminescence and a related technique called optically stimulated luminescence, is based on the naturally occurring background radiation in soils. Pottery, baked clay, and sediments that include quartz and feldspar are bombarded by radiation from the soils surrounding it. Electrons in the material get displaced from their orbit and trapped in the crystalline structure of the pottery, rock, or sediment. When a sample of the material is heated to 500\u00b0C (thermoluminescence) or exposed to particular light wavelengths (optically stimulated luminescence) in the laboratory, this energy gets released in the form of light and heat and can be measured (Cochrane Et al. 2013; Renfrew &amp; Bahn 2016, 160). You can use this method to date artifacts like pottery and burnt flint directly. When attempting to date fossils, you may use this method on the crystalline grains of quartz and feldspar in the surrounding soils (Cochrane Et al. 2013). The important thing to remember with this form of dating is that heating the artifact or soils will reset the clock. The method is not necessarily dating when the object was last made or used but when it was last heated to 500\u00b0C or more (pottery) or exposed to sunlight (sediments). Luminescence dating can be used on sites from less than 100 years to over 100,000 years (Duller 2008, 4). As with all archaeological data, context is crucial to understanding the information.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Like thermoluminescence dating, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_918\">electron spin resonance dating<\/a><\/strong> is based on the measurement of accumulated background radiation from the burial environment. It is used on artifacts and rocks with crystalline structures, including tooth enamel, shell, and rock\u2014those for which thermoluminescence would not work. The radiation causes electrons to become dislodged from their normal orbit. They become trapped in the crystalline matrix and affect the electromagnetic energy of the object. This energy can be measured and used to estimate the length of time in the burial environment. This technique works well for remains as old as two million years (Carvajal Et al. 2011, 115\u2013116). It has the added benefit of being nondestructive, which is an important consideration when dealing with irreplaceable material.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Not all chronometric dating methods are based on unstable isotopes and their rates of decay. There are several other methods that make use of other natural biological and geologic processes. One such method is known as dendrochronology (Figure 8.26), which is based on the natural growth patterns of trees. Trees create concentric rings as they grow; the width of those rings depends on environmental conditions and season. The age of a tree can be determined by counting its rings, which also show records of rainfall, droughts, and forest fires.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><img class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-1.png\" alt=\"A tree, cross-section of tree core, and tree-ring timeline.\" width=\"364\" height=\"397\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 384px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-1-1.png\" alt=\"Tree rings and dates.\" width=\"384\" height=\"396\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.26: Dendrochronology uses the variations in tree rings to create timelines. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Dendrochronology (Figure 7.34)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Tree rings can be used to date wood artifacts and ecofacts from archaeological sites. This first requires the creation of a profile of trees in a particular area. The Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research at the University of Arizona has a comprehensive and ongoing catalog of tree profiles (see University of Arizona n.d.). Archaeologists can then compare wood artifacts and ecofacts with existing timelines, provided the tree rings are visible, and find where their artifacts fit in the pattern. Dendrochronology has been in use since the early 20th century (Dean 2009, 25). The Northern Hemisphere chronology stretches back nearly 14,000 years (Reimer Et al. 2013, 1870) and has been used successfully to date southwestern U.S. sites such as Pueblo Bonito and Aztec Ruin (Dean 2009, 26). Dendrochronological evidence has helped calibrate radiocarbon dates and even provided direct evidence of global warming (Dean 2009, 26\u201327).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In Australia, dendrochronology, along with other environmental reconstruction methods, has been used to show that the Indigenous people had sophisticated land management systems before the arrival of British invaders. According to the work of Michael-Shawn Fletcher and colleagues (2021), there was a significant encroachment of the rainforests and tree species into grasslands after the British invasion. Prior to this time, Indigenous people managed the landscape through controlled burns at regular intervals. This practice created climate-resistant grasslands that were biodiverse and provided predictable food supplies for humans and other animals. Under European land management, there have been negative impacts on biodiversity and climate resilience and an increase in catastrophic wildfires (Fletcher Et al. 2021). This dating method does have its difficulties. Some issues are interrupted ring growth, microclimates, and species growth variations. This is addressed through using multiple samples, statistical analysis, and calibration with other dating methods. Despite these limitations, dendrochronology can be a powerful tool in dating archaeological sites (Hillam Et al. 1990; Kuniholm &amp; Striker 1987).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<p><span style=\"font-family: 'Cormorant Garamond', serif;font-size: 1.602em;font-weight: bold\">Special Topic: New Archaeological Evidence Found in Quebec<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Anticosti Island, located in eastern Canada, has emerged in recent years as a site of exceptional paleontological significance. Containing a remarkably well-preserved stratigraphic record, the island hosts over 1,440 fossil species dating back approximately 445 million years. This makes it one of the most complete and continuous marine fossil archives from the Late Ordovician period; a critical interval in Earth\u2019s history marked by the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction (LOME). As the second most ecologically severe extinction event of the Phanerozoic era, LOME resulted in the loss of nearly 85% of marine species (Bond &amp; Grasby, 2020). While previous research has focused on sedimentary records from various global locations, recent discoveries on Anticosti Island have offered compelling new evidence supporting oceanic anoxia as a primary mechanism driving this mass extinction. Research from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) describes marine anoxia as a drop in seawater oxygen levels, causing marine animals to asphyxiate, \u201ca potent killer that can account for extinctions in benthic groups and deeper-dwelling graptolites and conodonts\u201d (2020, p. 779). Sea-water pyrite sulphate isotope data and analyzing limestone composition are both useful ways in which scientists have gathered this new information, with prominent research published in the <em>Global and Planetary Change<\/em> journal suggesting a potential global perturbation of sulphur cycling during these times of glaciation (Zhang Et al. 2022). While this research is still in its infancy, it supports NERC\u2019s hypothesis that volcanic activity could have caused the second\u2013and most massive\u2013half of the LOME (Bond &amp; Grasby, 2020, p. 780); a warming of the seawater explaining the marine anoxia identified in the sediments. The 2023 designation of Anticosti Island as a UNESCO World Heritage Site underscores its dual significance as both a site of exceptional paleontological value and a place of deep cultural importance. In a CBC interview with Anticosti mayor H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Boulanger, she attributes this recognition to sustained efforts by the Innu communities of Ekuanitshit and Nutashkuan, who have long emphasized the island\u2019s role as a cultural anchor and a repository of ancestral knowledge (Gagn\u00e9-Coulombe, 2023). Anticosti Island now stands as a critical location for advancing scientific understanding of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction while simultaneously affirming the vital intersection of Indigenous stewardship and global heritage conservation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Environmental Reconstruction<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As you read in Chapter 2, Charles Darwin, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Alfred Russel Wallace, and others recognized the importance of the environment in shaping the evolutionary course of animal species. To understand what selective processes might be shaping evolutionary change, we must be able to reconstruct the environment in which the organism was living.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">One of the ways to do that is to look at the plant species that lived in the same time range as the species in which you are interested. One way to identify ancient flora is to analyze <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_920\">sediment cores<\/a><\/strong> from water and other protected sources. Pollen gets released into the air and some of that pollen will fall on wetlands, lakes, caves, and so forth. Eventually it sinks to the bottom of the lake and forms part of the sediment. This happens year after year, so subsequent layers of pollen build up in an area, creating strata. By taking a core sample and analyzing the pollen and other organic material, an archaeologist can build a timeline of plant types and see changes in the vegetation of the area (Hester Et al. 1997, 284). This can even be done over large areas by studying ocean bed cores, which accumulate pollen and dust from large swaths of neighbouring continents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While sediment coring is one of the more common ways to reconstruct past environments, there are a few other methods. These have been recently employed at Holocene Lake Ivanpah, a paleolake that straddles the California and Nevada border in the United States. This lake was originally thought to have been completely dry around 9,300\u20137,800 kya (Sims &amp; Spaulding 2017). However, analyzing core samples using soil identification, sediment chemistry, subsurface stratigraphy, and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_922\">geomorphology<\/a><\/strong> (the study of the physical characteristics of the Earth\u2019s surface) revealed deposition of three recent lake fillings during this period in the forms of additional hardpan, or lake bottom, playas, bedded or layered fine-grained (wetland) sediments, and buried beaches below the surface (Sims &amp; Spaulding 2017; Spaulding &amp; Sims 2018). These discoveries are important because they have not been integrated into interpretation of the local archaeological record, as it was assumed that the lake had been dry for thousands of years. Sedimentological analyses such as coring and those listed above can provide great insight into past climates and are accomplished in a minimally destructive way.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another way of reconstructing past environments is by using stable isotopes. Unlike unstable isotopes, stable isotopes remain constant in the environment throughout time. Plants take in the isotopes through photosynthesis and ground water absorption. Animals take in isotopes by drinking local water and eating plants. Stable isotopes can be powerful tools for identifying where an organism grew up and what kind of food the organism ate throughout its life. They can even be used to identify global temperature fluctuations.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Global Temperature Reconstruction<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Oxygen isotopes are a powerful tool in tracking global temperature fluctuations throughout time. The isotopes of Oxygen 18 (<sup>18<\/sup>O) and Oxygen 16 (<sup>16<\/sup>O) occur naturally in Earth\u2019s water. Both are stable isotopes, but <sup>18<\/sup>O has a heavier atomic weight. In the normal water cycle, evaporation takes water molecules from the surface to the atmosphere. Because <sup>16<\/sup>O is lighter, it is more likely to be part of this evaporation process. The moisture gathers in the atmosphere as clouds that eventually may produce rain or snow and release the water back to the surface of the planet. During cool periods like <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_924\">glacial periods<\/a><\/strong> (ice ages), the evaporated water often comes down to Earth\u2019s surface as snow. The snow piles up in the winter but, because of the cooler summers, does not melt off. Instead, it gets compacted and layered year after year, eventually resulting in large glaciers or ice sheets covering parts of Earth. Since <sup>16<\/sup>O, with the lighter atomic weight, is more likely to be absorbed in the evaporation process, it gets locked up in glacier formation. The waters left in oceans would have a higher ratio of <sup>18<\/sup>O during these periods of cooler global temperatures (Potts 2012, 154\u2013156; see Figure 8.27).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 389px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-1.png\" alt=\"Graph with oxygen isotope on y axis and years on x axis.\" width=\"389\" height=\"218\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.27: This graph depicts how temperatures of the sea have fluctuated greatly over the course of the history of the planet. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A full text description of this image is available.<\/a> Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.giss.nasa.gov\/research\/briefs\/1999_schmidt_01\/\">Oxygen in deep sea sediment carbonate (Figure 2)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.giss.nasa.gov\/\">NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies<\/a> originally from \"Science Briefs: Cold Climates, Warm Climates: How Can We Tell Past Temperatures?\" by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.giss.nasa.gov\/staff\/gschmidt.html\">Gavin Schmidt<\/a>, is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The microorganisms that live in the oceans, foraminifera, absorb the water from their environment and use the oxygen isotopes in their body structures. When these organisms die, they sink to the ocean floor, contributing to the layers of sediment. Scientists can extract these ocean cores and sample the remains of foraminifera for their <sup>18<\/sup>O and <sup>16<\/sup>O ratios. These ratios give us a good approximation of global temperatures deep into the past. Cooler temperatures indicate higher ratios of <sup>18<\/sup>O (Potts 2012, 154\u2013156).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong><em>Diet Reconstruction<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">You may be familiar with the saying \u201cyou are what you eat.\u201d When it comes to your teeth and bones, this adage is literal. Stable isotopes can also be used to reconstruct animal diet and migration patterns. Living organisms absorb elements from ingested plants and water. These elements are used in tissues like bones, teeth, skin, hair, and so on. By analyzing the stable isotopes in the bones and teeth of humans and other animals, we can identify the types of food they ate at different stages of their lives.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Plants take in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere during photosynthesis. We\u2019ve already discussed this using the example of the unstable isotope <sup>14<\/sup>C; however, this absorption also takes place with the stable isotopes of <sup>12<\/sup>C and <sup>13<\/sup>C. During photosynthesis, some plants incorporate carbon dioxide as a three-carbon molecule (C3 plants) and some as a four-carbon molecule (C4 plants). On the one hand, C3 plants include certain types of trees and shrubs that are found in relatively wet environments and have lower ratios of <sup>13<\/sup>C compared to <sup>12<\/sup>C. C4 plants, on the other hand, include plants from drier environments like savannahs and grasslands. C4 plants have higher ratios of <sup>13<\/sup>C to <sup>12<\/sup>C than C3 plants (Renfrew and Bahn 2016, 312). These ratios remain stable as you go up the food chain. Therefore, you can analyze the bones and teeth of an animal to identify the <sup>13<\/sup>C\/<sup>12<\/sup>C ratios and identify the types of plants that animal was eating.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The ratios of stable nitrogen isotopes <sup>15<\/sup>N and <sup>14<\/sup>N can also give information about the diet of fossilized or deceased organisms. Though initially absorbed from water and soils by plants, the nitrogen ratios change depending on the primary diet of the organism. An animal who has a mostly vegetarian diet will have lower ratios of <sup>15<\/sup>N to <sup>14<\/sup>N, while those further up the food chain, like carnivores, will have higher ratios of <sup>15<\/sup>N. Interestingly, breastfeeding infants have a higher nitrogen ratio than their mothers, because they are getting all of their nutrients through their mother\u2019s milk. So nitrogen can be used to track life events like weaning (Jay Et al. 2008, 2). A marine versus terrestrial diet will also affect the nitrogen signatures. Terrestrial diets have lower ratios of <sup>15<\/sup>N than marine diets. In the course of human evolution, this type of analysis can help us identify important changes in human nutrition. It can help anthropologists figure out when meat became a primary part of the ancient human diet or when marine resources began to be used. The ratios of stable nitrogen isotopes can also be used to determine a change in status, as in the case of the Llullaillaco children (the \u201cice mummies\u201d) found in the Andes Mountains. For instance, the nitrogen values in hair from the Llullaillaco Maiden showed a significant positive shift that is associated with increased meat consumption in the last 12 months of her life (Wilson Et al. 2007). Although the two younger children had little changes in their diets in the last year of their short lives, the changes in their nitrogen values were significant enough to suggest that the improvement in their diets may have been attributed to the Incas\u2019 desire to sacrifice healthy, high-status children\u201d (Faux 2012, 6).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Migration<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stable isotopes can also tell us a great deal about where an individual lived and whether they migrated during their lifetime. The geology of Earth varies because rocks and soils have different amounts or ratios of certain elements in them. These variations in the ratios of isotopes of certain elements are called isotopic signatures. They are like a chemical fingerprint for a geographical region. These isotopes get into the groundwater and are absorbed by plants and animals living in that area. Elements like strontium, oxygen, and nitrogen, among others, are then used by the body to build bones and teeth. If you ate and drank local water all of your life, your bones and teeth would have the same isotopic signature as the geographical region in which you lived.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">However, many people (and animals) move around during their lifetimes. Isotopic signatures can be used to identify migration patterns in organisms (Montgomery Et al. 2005). Teeth develop in early childhood. If the isotopes of teeth are analyzed, these isotopes would resemble those found in the geographic area where an individual lived as a child. Bones, however, are a different story. Bones are constantly changing throughout life. Old cells are removed and new cells are deposited to respond to growth, healing, activity change, and general deterioration. Therefore, the isotopic signature of bones will reflect the geographical area in which an individual spent the last seven to ten years of life. If an individual has different isotopic signatures for their bones and teeth, it could indicate a migration some time during their life after childhood.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 386px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24-2.jpg\" alt=\"Upright boulders of Stonehenge.\" width=\"386\" height=\"289\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.28: Stonehenge continues to provide clues to its mysterious existence with recent research using isotope ratios. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Stonehenge (Figure 7.37)<\/a> by Sarah S. King is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Recent work involving stable isotope analysis has been done on the cremation burials from Stonehenge, in Wessex, England (Figure 8.28). Much of the archaeological work at Stonehenge in the past focused on the building and development of the monument itself. That is partly because most of the burials at the monument were cremated remains, which are difficult to study because of their fragmentary nature and the chemical alterations that bone and teeth undergo when heated. The cremation process complicates the oxygen and carbon isotopes. However, the researchers determined that strontium would not be affected by heating and could still be analyzed in cranial fragments. Using the remains of 25 individuals, they compared their strontium signatures to the geology of Wessex and other regions of the UK. Fifteen of those individuals had strontium signatures that matched the local geology. This means that in the last ten or so years of their lives, they lived and ate food from around Stonehenge. However, ten of the individuals did not match the local geologic signature. These individuals had strontium ratios more closely aligned with the geology of west Wales. Archaeologists find this particularly interesting because in the early phases of Stonehenge\u2019s construction, the smaller \u201cblue stones\u201d were brought 200 km from Wales in a feat of early engineering. These larger regional connections show that Stonehenge was not just a site of local importance. It dominated a much larger region of influence and drew people from all over ancient Britain (Snoeck Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Cold Case Naia<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 455px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-1-2.png\" alt=\"Sites on Yucatan peninsula.\" width=\"455\" height=\"351\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.29: Map of Mexico showing the Yucatan Peninsula and the locations of Hoyo Negro and Sistema Sac Actun. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Hoyo Negro and Sistema Sac Actun, Mexic0 (Figure 7.38)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 2007, cave divers exploring the Sistema Sac Actun in the Yucat\u00e1n Peninsula in Mexico (see Figure 8.29 and 7.30) discovered the bones of a 15- to 16-year-old female human along with the bones of various extinct animals from the Pleistocene (Collins Et al. 2015). The site was named Hoyo Negro (\u201cBlack Hole\u201d). The human bones belonged to a Paleo-American, later named \u201cNaia\u201d after a Greek water nymph. Examination of the partially fossilized remains revealed a great deal about Naia\u2019s life, and the radiocarbon dating of her tooth enamel indicated that she lived some 13,000 years ago (Chatters Et al. 2014). Naia\u2019s arms were not overly developed, thus assuming her daily activities did not involve heavy carrying or grinding of grain or seeds. Her legs, however, were quite muscular, implying that Naia was used to walking long distances. Naia\u2019s teeth and bones indicate habitually poor nutrition. There is evidence of violent injury during the course of Naia\u2019s life from a healed spiral fracture of her left forearm. Naia also suffered from tooth decay and osteoporosis even though she appeared young and undersized. Dr. Jim Chatters hypothesizes that Naia entered the cave at a time when it was not flooded, probably looking for water. She may have become disoriented and fell off a high ledge to her death. The trauma to her pelvis is consistent with such an injury (Watson 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Naia\u2019s skeleton is remarkably complete given its age. As divers were able to locate her skull, Naia\u2019s physical appearance in life could be interpreted. Surprisingly, in examining the skull, it was determined that Naia did not resemble modern Indigenous peoples in the region. However, the<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_926\">mitochondrial DNA<\/a><\/strong> (mtDNA) recovered from a tooth indicates that Naia shares her DNA with modern Indigenous peoples (Chatters et al. 2014). Though Naia\u2019s burial environment made chemical analysis difficult, researchers were able to recover carbon isotopes from her remains. The isotopes from Naia\u2019s tooth enamel suggest a diet of \u201ccool-season grasses and\/or broad-leaf vegetation\u201d (Chatters Et al. 2022, 68). Naia\u2019s teeth also displayed numerous dental caries and only light dental wear. Coupled with the isotopic data, she likely had a \u201csofter, more sugar-rich diet\u201d (2022, 68).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 625px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image32-1.png\" alt=\"Cross-section of the Hoyo Negro cenote.\" width=\"625\" height=\"353\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 8.30: A diagram of the Sistema Sac Actun and the Hoyo Negro cenote where Naia rested underwater for roughly 13,000 years. The illustration depicts a cenote or hole in the ground leading to a long, narrow tunnel, ending in a large cavern. The cavern and tunnel are both filled with water. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-7\/\">Hoyo Negro cenote (Figure 7.39)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">With a timeline that extends back some 4.6 billion years, Earth has witnessed continental drift, environmental changes, and a growing complexity of life. Fossils, the mineralized remains of living organisms, provide physical evidence of life and the environment on the planet over the course of billions of years. In order to better understand the fossil record, anthropologists rely on the collaboration of numerous academic fields and disciplines. Anthropologists use a variety of scientific methods, both relative and chronometric, to analyze fossils to determine age, origins, and migration patterns as well as to provide insight into the health and diet of the fossilized organism. While each method has its advantages, disadvantages, and limited applications, these tools enable anthropologists to theorize how all living organisms evolved, including the evolution of early humans into modern humans, <em>H. sapiens<\/em>. The fossil record is far from complete, but our expanding understanding of the fossil context, with exciting new discoveries and improved scientific methods, enables us to document the history of our planet and the evolution of life on Earth.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Dating Methods Quick Guide<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 617px;height: 861px\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 24.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"padding: 5pt;border: 1pt solid #000000;height: 30px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Method<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 1pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Material <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 1pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Effective date range<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 24.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stratigraphy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Soil layers<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Relative<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 37.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 36px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Biostratigraphy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 36px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Plant and animal remains<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 36px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Relative<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 24.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cultural dating<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Human-made objects<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Relative<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 24.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fluorine<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bone, antler, teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 30px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Relative<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 78.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 90px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Radiocarbon<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 90px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Organic carbon bearing material (bones, teeth, antler, plant material, shell, charcoal)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 90px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Younger than 55,000 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 37.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Potassium-argon and argon-argon<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Volcanic rock<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Older than 100,000 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 64.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 72px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Uranium series<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 72px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carbonates such as stalactites, stalagmites, corals, caliche, and tufa<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 72px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Younger than 650,000 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 37.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fission track<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Volcanic glasses and crystalline minerals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Spans age of Earth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 37.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Luminescence<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pottery, baked clay, sediments<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 46px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100 to older than 100,000 years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 51.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 54px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Electron spin resonance dating<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 54px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tooth enamel, shell, rock with crystalline structures<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 54px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Younger than 2 million years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 51.25pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt;padding: 5pt;height: 61px;width: 157.257px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dendrochronology<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 61px;width: 249.67px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wood (where tree rings are identifiable)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-color: #000000;border-style: solid;border-width: 0.75pt 1pt 1pt 0.75pt;padding: 5pt;height: 61px;width: 165.625px\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dependent on location and available chronologies<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 160.59px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 253.003px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 168.958px\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">How do remains become fossils? What conditions are necessary for the fossilization process?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">What kind of information could you acquire from a single fossil? What could it tell you about the broader environment?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">What factors would you take into consideration when deciding which dating method to use for a particular artifact?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">What methods do anthropologists use to reconstruct past environments and lifestyles?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Anaerobic<\/strong>: An oxygen-free environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Anthropocene<\/strong>: The proposed name for our current geologic epoch based on human-driven climate change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Argon-argon (Ar-Ar) dating<\/strong>: A chronometric dating method that measures the ratio of argon gas in volcanic rock to estimate time elapsed since the volcanic rock cooled and solidified. See also <em>potassium-argon dating<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Atom<\/strong>: A small building block of matter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Bezoars<\/strong>: Hard, concrete-like substances found in the intestines of fossil creatures.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Biostratigraphy<\/strong>: A relative dating method that uses other plant and animal remains occurring in the stratigraphic context to establish time depth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Bya<\/strong>: Billion years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Chronometric dating<\/strong>: Dating methods that give estimated numbers of years for artifacts and sites.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Continental drift<\/strong>: The slow movement of continents over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Coprolite<\/strong>: Fossilized poop.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Cultural dating<\/strong>: The relative dating method that arranges human-made artifacts in a time frame from oldest to youngest based on material, production technique, style, and other features.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Deep Time<\/strong>: James Hutton\u2019s theory that the world was much older than biblical explanations allowed. This age could be determined by gradual natural processes like soil erosion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Dendrochronology<\/strong>: A chronometric dating method that uses the annual growth of trees to build a timeline into the past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Electron spin resonance dating<\/strong>: A chronometric dating method that measures the background radiation accumulated in material over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Element<\/strong>: Matter that cannot be broken down into smaller matter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Eon<\/strong>: The largest unit of geologic time, spanning billions of years and divided into subunits called <em>eras<\/em>, <em>periods<\/em>, and <em>epochs<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Epochs<\/strong>: The smallest units of geologic time, spanning thousands to millions of years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Eras<\/strong>: Units of geologic time that span millions to billions of years and that are subdivided into <em>periods<\/em> and <em>epochs<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Fission track dating<\/strong>: A chronometric dating method that is based on the fission of <sup>283<\/sup>U.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Fluorine dating<\/strong>: A relative dating method that analyzes the absorption of fluorine in bones from the surrounding soils.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Foraminifera<\/strong>: Single-celled marine organisms with shells.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Fossilization<\/strong>: The process by which an organism becomes a fossil.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Fossils<\/strong>: Mineralized copies of organisms or activity imprints.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>G<\/strong><strong>eomorphology<\/strong>: The study of the physical characteristics of the Earth\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Glacial periods<\/strong>: Periods characterized by low global temperatures and the expansion of ice sheets on Earth\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Holocene<\/strong>: The geologic epoch from 10 kya to present. (See the discussion on \u201cthe Anthropocene\u201d for the debate regarding the current epoch name.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong>: The term used for humans and their ancestors after the split with chimpanzees and bonobos.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>In matrix<\/strong>: When a fossil is embedded in a substance, such as igneous rock.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Isotopes<\/strong>: Variants of elements.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Kya<\/strong>: Thousand years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Law of Superposition<\/strong>: The scientific law that states that rock and soil are deposited in layers, with the youngest layers on top and the oldest layers on the bottom.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Lithification<\/strong>: The process by which the pressure of sediments squeeze extra water out of decaying remains and replace the voids that appear with minerals from the surrounding soil and groundwater.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Luminescence dating<\/strong>: The chronometric dating method based on the buildup of background radiation in pottery, clay, and soils.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Megafauna<\/strong>: Large animals such as mammoths and mastodons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Mitochondrial DNA<\/strong>: DNA located in the mitochondria of a cell that is only passed down from biological mother to child.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Mya<\/strong>: Million years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>P<\/strong><strong>aleopathology<\/strong>: Study of ancient diseases and injuries identified through examining remains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Periods<\/strong>: Geologic time units that span millions of years and are subdivided into <em>epochs<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Permineralization<\/strong>: When minerals from water impregnate or replace organic remains, leaving a fossilized copy of the organism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Petrified wood<\/strong>: A fossilized piece of wood in which the original organism is completely replaced by minerals through petrifaction.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating<\/strong>: A chronometric dating method that measures the ratio of argon gas in volcanic rock to estimate time elapsed since the volcanic rock cooled and solidified. See also <em>argon-argon dating<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Pseudofossils<\/strong>: Natural rocks or mineral formations that can be mistaken for fossils.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Radioactive decay<\/strong>: The process of transforming the atom by spontaneously releasing energy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Radiocarbon dating<\/strong>: The chronometric dating method based on the radioactive decay of <sup>14<\/sup>C in organic remains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Relative dating<\/strong>: Dating methods that do not result in numbers of years but, rather, in relative timelines wherein some organisms or artifacts are older or younger than others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Sediment cores<\/strong>: Core samples taken from lake beds or other water sources for analysis of their pollen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Stable isotopes<\/strong>: Variants of elements that do not change over time without outside interference.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Stratigraphy<\/strong>: A relative dating method that is based on ordered layers or (strata) that build up over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Taphonomy<\/strong>: The study of what happens to an organism after death.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Trace fossils<\/strong>: Fossilized remains of activity such as footprints.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Uniformitarianism<\/strong>: The theoretical perspective that the geologic processes observed today are the same as the processes operating in the past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Unstable isotopes<\/strong>: Variants of elements that spontaneously change into stable isotopes over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Uranium series dating<\/strong>: A radiometric dating method based on the decay chain of unstable isotopes of <sup>238<\/sup>U and <sup>235<\/sup>U.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Books<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bjornerud, Marcia. 2006. <em>Reading the Rocks: The Autobiography of the Earth<\/em>. New York: Basic Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hazen, Robert M. 2013. <em>The Story of Earth: The First 4.5 Billion Years, From Stardust to Living Planet<\/em>. New York: Viking Penguin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Holmes, Richard. 2010. <em>The Age of Wonder: The Romantic Generation and the Discovery of the Beauty and Terror of Science<\/em>. New York: Vintage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Palmer, Douglas. 2005. <em>Earth Time: Exploring the Deep Past from Victorian England to the Grand Canyon<\/em>. New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Prothero, Donald R. 2015. <em>The Story of Life in 25 Fossils: Tales of Intrepid Fossil Hunters and the Wonder of Evolution<\/em>. New York: Columbia University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pyne, Lydia. 2016. <em>Seven Skeletons: The Evolution of the World\u2019s Most Famous Human Fossils<\/em>. New York: Viking Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Repcheck, Jack. 2009. <em>The Man Who Found Time: James Hutton and the Discovery of the Earth\u2019s Antiquity<\/em>. New York: Basic Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taylor, Paul D., Aaron O\u2019Dea. 2014. <em>A History of Life in 100 Fossils<\/em>. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ward, David. 2002. <em>Smithsonian Handbooks: Fossils<\/em>. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Winchester, Simon. 2009. <em>The Map That Changed the World: William Smith and the Birth of Modern Geology<\/em>. New York: Harper Perennial.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Websites<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ambermuseum.eu\/en\/\">Amber Museum<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.etsu.edu\/cas\/paleontology\/\">East Tennessee State University Center of Excellence in Paleontology<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.granger.com\/\">Granger Historical Picture Archive<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/indigarchs\/\">Indigenous Archaeology Collective<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tarpits.org\">La Brea Tar Pits Museum<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lymeregismuseum.co.uk\">Lyme Regis Museum<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhm.ac.uk\/discover\/mary-anning-unsung-hero.html\">Natural History Museum (London), on Mary Anning<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/en.pechmerle.com\">Pech Merle Cave<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/pefo\/index.htm\">Petrified Forest National Park (NE Arizona)<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/poozeum.com\">Poozeum: The No. 2 Wonder of the World<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/paleobiology.si.edu\/fossiLab\/projects.html\">Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Department of Paleobiology<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, on <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\">\u201cWhat Does It Mean to be Human\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Canadian Archaeology Association , <a href=\"https:\/\/canadianarchaeology.com\/caa\/about\/ethics\/principles-ethical-conduct\">\u201cPrinciples of Archaeological Ethics\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Society for American Archaeology, on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.saa.org\/career-practice\/ethics-in-professional-archaeology\">\u201cEthics in Professional Archaeology\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Antoine, Pierre-Oliver, Maeva J. Orliac, Gokhan Atici, Inan Ulusoy, Erdal Sen, H. Evren \u00c7ubuk\u00e7u, Ebru lbayrak, Ne\u015fe Oyal, Erkan Aydar, and Sevket Sen. 2012. \u201cA Rhinocerotid Skull Cooked to Death in a 9.2 Mya-Old Ignimbrite Flow of Turkey.\u201d <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 7 (11): e49997.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Aufderheide, Arthur C. 2003. <em>The Scientific Study of Mummies<\/em>. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bar-Yosef, O., and M. Belmaker. 2011. \u201cEarly and Middle Pleistocene Faunal and Hominins Dispersals through Southwestern Asia.\u201d<em> Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 30 (11\u201312): 1318\u20131337.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Barras, C. 2022. \u201cLost Footprints of Our Ancestors.\u201d <em>New Scientist<\/em> 254 (3381): 40\u201344.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Blong, John C., Martin E. Adams, Gabriel Sanchez, Dennis L. Jenkins, Ian D. Bull, and Lisa-Marie Shillito. 2020. \u201cYounger Dryas and Early Holocene Subsistence in the Northern Great Basin: Multiproxy Analysis of Coprolites from the Paisley Caves, Oregon, USA.\u201d <em>Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences<\/em> 12 (9): 1\u201329.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Boaz, Noel T., Russel L. Ciochon, Qinqi Xu, and Jinyi Liu. 2004. \u201cMapping and Taphonomic Analysis of the <em>Homo erectus<\/em> Loci at Locality 1 Zhoukoudian, China.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution <\/em>46 (5): 519\u2013549.<\/p>\n<p>Bond, D., &amp; Grasby, S. (2020). Supplemental material: Late Ordovician mass extinction caused by volcanism, warming, and anoxia, not cooling and glaciation. Geology, 48(8), 777\u2013781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/geol.26213s.12221825.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Booth, Thomas J., Andrew T. Chamberlain, and Mike Parker Pearson. 2015. \u201cMummification in Bronze Age Britain.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 89 (347): 1,155\u20131,173.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bradley, Raymond S. 2015. \u201cChapter 3: Dating Methods I.\u201d In <em>Paleoclimatology<\/em>, edited by Raymond S. Bradley, 55\u2013101. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brown, Theodore L., H. Eugene LeMay Jr., Bruce E. Burston, Catherine J. Murphy, Patrick M. Woodward, and Matthew Stoltzfus. 2018. <em>Chemistry: The Central Science.<\/em> New York: Pearson.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Campbell, Neil A., and Jane B. Reece. 2005. <em>Biology 7th ed. <\/em>New York: Pearson.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Carvajal, Eduar, Luis Montes, and Ovidio A. Almanza. 2011. \u201cQuaternary Dating by Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) Applied to Human Tooth Enamel.\u201d <em>Earth Sciences Research Journal<\/em> 15 (2): 115\u2013120.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Chatters, James C., Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales, and Pilar Luna-Erreguerena. 2022. \u201cThe Pre-Ceramic Skeletal Record of Mexico and Central America.\u201d In <em>The Routledge Handbook of Mesoamerican Bioarchaeology,<\/em> edited by V. Tieslar, 49\u201374. New York: Routledge.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chatters, James C., Douglas J. Kennett, Yemane Asmerom, Brian M. Kemp, Victor Polyak, Alberto Nava Blank, Patricia A. Beddows, et al. 2014. \u201cLate Pleistocene Human Skeleton and mtDNA Link Paleoamericans and Modern Native Americans.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 344 (6185): 750\u2013754.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clough, Sharon. 2020. \"Ethics in Human Osteology.\" <em>The Archaeologist<\/em> 109 (2020): 3\u20135.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cochrane, Grant W. G., Trudy Doelman, and Lyn Wadley. 2013. \u201cAnother Dating Revolution for Prehistoric Archaeology?\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 20 (1): 42\u201360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Collins, S. V., E. G. Reinhardt, D. Rissolo, J. C. Chatters, A. Nava-Blank, and P. Luna-Erreguerena. 2015. \u201cReconstructing Water Level in Hoyo Negro, Quintana Roo, Mexico: Implications for Early Paleoamerican and Faunal Access.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews <\/em>124: 68\u201383.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cook, Harold J. 1928. \u201cGlacial Age Man in New Mexico.\u201d <em>Scientific American<\/em> 139 (1): 38\u201340.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cook, S. F., and H. C. Ezra-Cohn. 1959. \u201cAn Evaluation of the Fluorine Dating Method.\u201d <em>Southwestern Journal of Anthropology <\/em>15 (3): 276\u2013290.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cooper, Arnie. 2010. \u201cSticky Situation at the Tar Pits.\u201d <em>LA Weekly<\/em>, May 27, 2010. https:\/\/www.laweekly.com\/sticky-situation-at-the-tar-pits\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Crompton, Robin H., Todd C. Pataky, Russell Savage, Kristiaan D\u2019Ao\u00fbt, Matthew R. Bennett, Michael H. Day, Karl Bates, Sarita Morse, and William I. Sellers. 2012. \u201cHuman-like External Function of the Foot, and Fully Upright Gait, Confirmed in the 3.66 Million Year Old Laetoli Hominin Footprints by Topographic Statistics, Experimental Footprint-Formation and Computer Simulation.\u201d <em>Journal of the Royal Society Interface<\/em> 9 (69): 707\u2013719. doi: 10.1098\/rsif.2011.0258<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Crutzen, Paul J., and Eugene F. Stoermer. 2000. \u201cThe \u2018Anthropocene.\u2019\u201d <em>Global Change Newsletter<\/em> 41: 17\u201318.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Darwin, Charles. 1859. <em>On the Origin of Species<\/em>. London, UK: John Murray.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dean, Jeffery S. 2009. \u201cOne Hundred Years of Dendroarchaeology: Dating, Human Behavior, and Past Climate.\u201d In <em>Tree-rings, Kings, and Old World Archaeology and Environment: Papers Presented in Honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm<\/em>, edited by S. Manning and M. J. Bruce, 25\u201332. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dolnick, Edward. 2011. <em>The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World<\/em>. New York: HarperCollins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Duller, G.A.T. 2008. <em>Luminescence Dating: Guidelines on Using Luminescence Dating in Archaeology<\/em>. Swindon, UK: English Heritage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Eisenbeiss, Sabine. 2016. \u201cPreserved in Peat: Decoding Bodies from Lower Saxony, Germany.\u201d <em>Expedition<\/em> 58 (2): 18\u201321.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Emling, Shelley. 2009. <em>The Fossil Hunter: Dinosaurs, Evolution, and the Woman Whose Discoveries Changed the World<\/em>. New York: St. Martin\u2019s Griffin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Faux, Jennifer L. 2012. \u201cHail the Conquering Gods: Ritual Sacrifice of Children in Inca Society.\u201d <em>Journal of Contemporary Anthropology<\/em> 3 (1): 1\u201315.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Feder, Kenneth L. 2017. <em>The Past in Perspective: An Introduction to Human Prehistory<\/em>. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fletcher, Michael-Shawn, Tegan Hall, and Andreas Nicholas Alexandra. 2021. \u201cThe Loss of an Indigenous Constructed Landscape Following British Invasion of Australia: An Insight into the Deep Human Imprint on the Australian Landscape.\u201d <em>Ambio<\/em> 50 (1): 138\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Flowers, Paul, Klaus Theopold, Richard Langley, and William R. Robinson. 2018. <em>Chemistry<\/em>. Houston, TX: Openstax, Rice University.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fumagalli, Matteo, Ida Moltke, Niels Grarup, Fernando Racimo, Peter Bjerregaard, Marit E. J\u00f8rgensen, Thorfinn S. Korneliussen, Pascale Gerbault, Line Skotte, Allan Linneberg, Cramer Christensen, Ivan Brandslund, Torben J\u00f8rgensen, Emilia Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Erik B. Schmidt, Oluf Pedersen, Torben Hansen, Anders Albrechtsen, and Rasmus Nielsen. 2015. \u201cGreenlandic Inuit show genetic signatures of diet and climate adaptation.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 349 (6254): 1343-1347.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Funkhouser, J. G., I. L. Barnes, and J. J. Naughton. 1966. \u201dProblems in the Dating of Volcanic Rocks by the Potassium-Argon Method.\u201d<em> Bull Volcanol<\/em> 29: 709\u2013717.<\/p>\n<p>Gagn\u00e9-Coulombe, L. (2023, September 20). Quebec\u2019s Anticosti Island named UNESCO World Heritage Site. CBC news. https:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/news\/canada\/montreal\/anticosti-island-world-heritage-site-1.6971150.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Giles, Melanie. 2020. <em>Bog Bodies: Face to Face with the Past.<\/em> Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Goodrum, Matthew R., and Cora Olson. 2009. \u201cThe Quest for an Absolute Chronology in Human Prehistory: Anthropologists, Chemists, and the Fluorine Dating Method in Palaeoanthropology.\u201d <em>British Journal for the History of Science<\/em> 42 (1): 95\u2013114.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Granger, Darryl E., Ryan J. Gibbon, Kathleen Kuman, Ronald J. Clarke, Laurent Bruxelles, and Marc W. Caffee. 2015. \u201cNew Cosmogenic Burial Ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 <em>Australopithecus<\/em> and Member 5 Oldowan.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 522 (7554): 85\u201388.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Granger Historical Picture Archive. 2018. <em>Cro-Magnon Footprint<\/em>. Image no. 0167868. Accessed March, 02, 2023. <a class=\"rId129\" href=\"https:\/\/www.granger.com\/results.asp?image=0167868&amp;itemw=4&amp;itemf=0001&amp;itemstep=1&amp;itemx=11&amp;screenwidth=1085\">https:\/\/www.granger.com\/results.asp?image=0167868&amp;itemw=4&amp;itemf=0001&amp;itemstep=1&amp;itemx=11&amp;screenwidth=1085<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gruhn, R., 2020. \u201cEvidence Grows That Peopling of the Americas Began More Than 20,000 Years Ago.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 584: 47\u201348.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Haddy, A., and A. Hanson. 1982. \u201cResearch Notes and Application Reports Nitrogen and Fluorine Dating of Moundville Skeletal Samples. <em>Archaeometry<\/em> 24 (1): 37\u201344.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hajdas, I., P. Ascough, M. H. Garnett, S. J. Fallon, C. L. Pearson, G. Quarta, K. L. Spalding, H. Yamaguchi, and M. Yoneda. 2021. \u201cRadiocarbon Dating.\u201d <em>Nature Reviews Methods Primers<\/em> 1 (62): 1\u201326.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hatala, Kevin G., Brigitte Demes, and Brian G. Richmond. 2016. \u201cLaetoli Footprints Reveal Bipedal Gait Biomechanics Different from Those of Modern Humans and Chimpanzees.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B<\/em> 283: 20160235. <a class=\"rId130\" href=\"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2016.0235\">https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2016.0235<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hester, Thomas R., Harry J. Shafer, and Kenneth L. Feder. 1997. <em>Field Methods in Archaeology<\/em>, 7th ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hillam, J., C. M. Groves, D. M. Brown, M. G. L. Baillie, J. M. Coles, and B. J. Coles. 1990. \u201cDendrochronology of the English Neolithic.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 64 (243): 210\u2013220.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Holmes, Richard. 2010. <em>The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science<\/em>. New York: Vintage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ingber, Sasha. 2012. \u201cVolcano Eruption Baked Rare Rhino Fossil.\u201d <em>National Geographic News<\/em>, November 30, 2012. Accessed July 25, 2018. https:\/\/www.nationalgeographic.com\/science\/article\/121130-rare-rhino-fossil-created-by-volcanic-explosion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Jay, Mandy, B. T. Fuller, Michael P. Richards, Christopher J. Kn\u00fcsel, and Sarah S. King. 2008. \u201cIron Age Breastfeeding Practices in Britain: Isotopic Evidence from Wetwang Slack, East Yorkshire.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 136 (3): 327\u2013337.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Jones, Nicola. 2020. \u201cCarbon Dating, the Archaeological Workhorse, Is Getting a Major Reboot.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em><em> News<\/em>, May 19, 2020. doi: <a class=\"rId131\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-020-01499-y\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-020-01499-y<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Klein, Richard G. 1999. <em>The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins<\/em>, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Komar, Debra A., and Jane E. Buikstra. 2008. <em>Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice<\/em>. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Kuniholm, Peter Ian, and Cecil L. Striker. 1987. \u201cDendrochronological Investigations in the Aegean and Neighboring Regions, 1983\u20131986.\u201d <em>Journal of Field Archaeology<\/em> 14 (4): 385\u2013398.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Laurenzi, Marinella A., Maria Laura Balestrieri, Giulio Bigazzi, Julio C. Hadler Neto, Pedro J. Iunes, Pio Norelli, Massimo Oddone, Ana Maria Osorio Araya, and Jos\u00e9 G. Viramonte. 2007. \u201cNew Constraints on Ages of Glasses Proposed as Reference Materials for Fission-Track Dating.\u201d <em>Geostandards &amp; Geoanalytical Research<\/em> 31 (2): 105\u2013124.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lebatard, Anne-Elisabeth, Didier L. Bourl\u00e8s, Philippe Duringer, Marc Jolivet, R\u00e9gis Braucher, Julien Carcaillet, Mathieu Schuster, et al. 2008. \u201cCosmogenic Nuclide Dating of <em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em> and <em>Australopithecus bahrelghazali<\/em>: Mio-Pliocene Hominids from Chad.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 105 (9): 3226\u20133231.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lyell, Charles. 1830\u20131833. <em>Principles of Geology, Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth\u2019s Surface, by Reference to Causes Now in Operation<\/em>. 3 vols. London: John Murray.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Maixner, Frank, Dmitrij Turaev, Amaury Cazenave-Gassiot, Marek Janko, Ben Krause-Kyora, Michael R. Hoopmann, Ulrike Kusebauch, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Iceman\u2019s Last Meal Consisted of Fat, Wild Meat, and Cereals.\u201d <em>Current Biology<\/em> Report 28 (14): 2348\u20132355.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Masao, Fidelis T., Elgidius B. Ichumbaki, Marco Cherin, Angelo Barili, Giovanni Boschian, David A. Lurino, Sofia Menconero, Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi, and Giorgio Manzi. 2016. \u201cNew Footprints from Laetoli (Tanzania) Provide Evidence for Marked Body Size Variation in Early Hominins.\u201d\u00a0<em>eLife <\/em>5: e19568. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/19568\">https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/19568<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McDonough, Katelyn, Taryn Johnson, Ted Goebel, and Karl Reinhard. 2022. \u201cDisease, Diet, and Thorny Headed Worm Infection in the Great Basin.\u201d Paper presented at 50th Annual Meeting of the Nevada Archaeological Association, Tonopah, Nevada, April 22nd, 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Michels, Joseph W. 1972. \u201cDating Methods.\u201d <em>Annual Review of Anthropolog<\/em>y 1: 113\u2013126.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Monastersky, Richard. 2015. \u201cAnthropocene: The Human Age.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 519 (7542): 144\u2013147.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Montgomery, Janet, Jane A. Evans, Dominic Powlesland, and Charlotte A. Roberts. 2005. \u201cContinuity or Colonization in Anglo-Saxon England? Isotope Evidence for Mobility, Subsistence Practice, and Status at West Heslerton.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 126 (2): 123\u2013138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">National Park Service. 2022. \u201cFossilized Footprints.\u201d <em>National Park Service <\/em>website, February 1. Accessed May 31, 2022. https:\/\/www.nps.gov\/whsa\/learn\/nature\/fossilized-footprints.htm.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pastoors, Andreas, Tilman Lenssen-Erz, Bernd Breuckmann, Tsamkxao Ciqae, Ui Kxunta, Dirk Rieke-Zapp, and Thui Thao. 2017. \u201cExperience Based Reading of Pleistocene Human Footprints in Pech-Merle.\u201d <em>Quaternary International <\/em>430 (A): 155\u2013162.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Potts, Richard. 2012. \u201cEvolution and Environmental Change in Early Human Prehistory.\u201d <em>Annual Review of Anthropology<\/em> 41: 151\u2013167.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Raichlen, David A., and Adam D. Gordon. 2017. \u201cInterpretation of Footprints From Site S Confirms Human-like Bipedal Biomechanics in Laetoli Hominins.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 107: 134\u2013138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ravn, Morten. 2010. \u201cBronze and Early Iron Age Bog Bodies from Denmark.\u201d <em>Acta Archaeologica<\/em> 81 (1): 112\u2013113.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reimer, Paula J., Edouard Bard, Alex Bayliss, J. Warren Beck, Paul G. Blackwell, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Caitlin E. Buck, et al. 2013. \u201cINTCAL13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0\u201350,000 Years cal BP.\u201d <em>Radiocarbon<\/em> 55 (4): 1869\u20131887.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reinhard, Johan. 2006. <em>Ice Maiden: Inca Mummies, Mountain Gods, and Sacred Sites in the Andes<\/em>. Washington, DC.: National Geographic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reitz, Elizabeth J., and Elizabeth S. Wing. 1999. <em>Zooarchaeology<\/em>. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Renfrew, Colin, and Paul Bahn. 2016. <em>Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice<\/em>, 7th ed. New York: Thames and Hudson.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ruddiman, William F., Zhengtang Guo, Xin Zhou, Hanbin Wu, and Yanyan Yu. 2008. \u201cEarly Rice Farming and Anomalous Methane Trends.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 27 (13\u201314): 1291\u20131295.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Schmidt, Gavin. 1999. \u201cScience Briefs: Cold Climates, Warm Climates: How Can We Tell Past Temperatures?\u201d <em>National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Institute for Space Studies<\/em>. <a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/www.giss.nasa.gov\/research\/briefs\/1999_schmidt_01\/\">https:\/\/www.giss.nasa.gov\/research\/briefs\/1999_schmidt_01\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shillito, Lisa-Marie, John C. Blong, Eleanor J. Green, and Eline N. van Asperen. 2020a. \u201cThe What, How and Why of Archaeological Coprolite Analysis.\u201d <em>Earth-Science Reviews<\/em> 207. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.earscirev.2020.103196\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.earscirev.2020.103196<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shillito, Lisa-Marie, Helen L. Whelton, John C. Blong, Dennis L. Jenkins, Thomas J. Connolly, and Ian D. Bull. 2020b. \u201cPre-Clovis occupation of the Americas Identified by Human Fecal Biomarkers in Coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 6 (29).\u200b\u200b https:\/\/www.science.org\/doi\/10.1126\/sciadv.aba6404.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sims, Douglas., and W. Spaulding. 2017. \u201cShallow Subsurface Evidence for Postglacial Holocene Lakes at Ivanpah Dry Lake: An Alternative Energy Development Site in the Central Mojave Desert, California, USA.\u201d <em>Journal of Geography and Geology<\/em> 9 (1): 1\u201324. DOI: <a class=\"rId135\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5539\/jgg.v9n1p1\">10.5539\/jgg.v9n1p1<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Slon, Viviane, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Benjamin Vernot, Cesare De Filippo, Steffi Grote, Bence Viola, Mateja Hajdinjak, St\u00e9phane Peyr\u00e9gne, Sarah Nagel, Samantha Brown, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Genome of the Offspring of a Neanderthal Mother and a Denisovan Father.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 561 (7721): 113\u2013116.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. 2018. Laetoli Footprint Trails. Smithsonian National Museum of History, October 23. Accessed February 14, 2023. <a class=\"rId136\" href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/behavior\/footprints\/laetoli-footprint-trails\">https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/behavior\/footprints\/laetoli-footprint-trails<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Snoeck, Christophe, John Pouncett, Philippe Claeys, Steven Goderis, Nadine Mattielli, Mike Parker Pearson, Christie Willis, Antoine Zazzo, Julia A. Lee-Thorp, and Rick J. Schulting. 2018. \u201cStrontium Isotope Analysis on Cremated Human Remains from Stonehenge Support[sic] Links With West Wales.\u201d <em>Scientific Reports <\/em>8. <a class=\"rId137\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-018-28969-8\">https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-018-28969-8<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Spaulding, W. G., and D. B. Sims. 2018. \u201cA Glance to the East: Lake Ivanpah\u2014An Isolated Southern Great Basin Paleolake. <em>The 2018 Desert Symposium Field Guide and Proceedings<\/em>, 121-131. <a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/340493333_A_glance_to_the_east_Lake_Ivanpah-_an_isolated_southern_Great_Basin_paleolake\">https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/340493333_A_glance_to_the_east_Lake_Ivanpah-_an_isolated_southern_Great_Basin_paleolake<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Spray, Aaron. \u201cLa Brea Woman: Only (&amp; Controversial) Human from La Brea Tar Pits.\u201d <em>The Travel<\/em>, April 3, 2022. Accessed July 31, 2022. <a class=\"rId139\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thetravel.com\/what-to-know-of-the-la-brea-woman\/\">https:\/\/www.thetravel.com\/what-to-know-of-the-la-brea-woman\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Steffen, Will, Johan Rockstr\u00f6m, Katherine Richardson, Timothy M. Lenton, Carl Folke, Diana Liverman, Colin P. Summerhayes, et al. 2018. \u201cTrajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene.\u201d <em>PNAS <\/em>115 (33): 8252\u20138259.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stodder, Ann L. W. 2008. \u201cTaphonomy and the Nature of Archaeological Assemblages.\u201d In <em>Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton<\/em>, edited by M. Anne Katzenberg and Shelley R. Saunders, 71\u2013115. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Straus, Lawrence Guy. 1989. \u201cGrave Reservations: More on Paleolithic Burial Evidence.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 30 (5): 633\u2013634.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sullivan, Terry, and Harry Gifford. 1908. <em>She Sells Sea-Shells<\/em>. London: Francis, Day, and Hunter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taylor, Anthony, Jarod M. Hutson, Vaughn M. Bryant, and Dennis L. Jenkins. 2020. \u201cDietary Items in Early to Late Holocene Human Coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon, USA.\u201d <em>Palynology<\/em> 44 (1): 12\u201323.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taylor, Paul D., Aaron O\u2019Dea. 2014. <em>A History of Life in 100 Fossils<\/em>. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Books.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">T\u00f6rnqvist, T. E., B. E. Rosenheim, P. Hu, and A. B. Fernandez. 2015. \u201cRadiocarbon Dating and Calibration.\u201d In <em>Handbook of Sea-Level Research<\/em>, edited by Ian Shennan, Antony J. Long, and Benjamin P. Horton, 347-360. Oxford, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons. <a class=\"rId140\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781118452547.ch23\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781118452547.ch23<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">University of Arizona. n.d. \u201cUranium-Thorium Dating: The Uranium 238 Decay Series.\u201d Accessed November 21, 2022. <a class=\"rId141\" href=\"https:\/\/www.geo.arizona.edu\/Antevs\/ecol438\/uthdating.html\">https:\/\/www.geo.arizona.edu\/Antevs\/ecol438\/uthdating.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">University of the Witwatersrand. 2017. \u201cLittle Foot Takes a Bow: South Africa\u2019s Oldest and the World\u2019s Most Complete <em>Australopithecus<\/em> Skeleton Ever Found, Introduced to the World.\u201d <em>ScienceDaily<\/em>, December 6. Accessed February 14, 2023. <a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/12\/171206100104.htm\">https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2017\/12\/171206100104.htm<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">van Calsteren, Peter, and Louise Thomas. 2006. \u201cUranium-Series Dating Applications in Natural Environmental Science.\u201d <em>Earth-Science Reviews<\/em> 75 (1\u20134): 155\u2013175.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Vanzetti, A., M. Vidale, M. Gallinaro, D. W. Frayer, and L. Bondioli. 2010. \u201cThe Iceman as a Burial.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 84 (325): 681\u2013692. <a class=\"rId143\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0003598X0010016X\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0003598X0010016X<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Verghese, Namrata. 2021. \u201cWhat Is Necropolitics? The Political Calculation of Life and Death.\u201d <em>Teen Vogue<\/em>. March 10, 2021. Accessed February 14, 2023. https:\/\/www.teenvogue.com\/story\/what-is-necropolitics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Vidale, M., L. Bondioli, D. W. Frayer, M. Gallinaro, and A. Vanzetti. 2016. \u201c\u00d6tzi the Iceman.\u201d <em>Expedition<\/em> 58 (2): 13\u201317. Accessed February 14, 2023. <a class=\"rId144\" href=\"https:\/\/www.penn.museum\/sites\/expedition\/otzi-the-iceman\/\">https:\/\/www.penn.museum\/sites\/expedition\/otzi-the-iceman\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wade, Lizzie. 2021. \"Footprints Support Claim of Early Arrival in the Americas.\" <em>Science <\/em>373 (6562): 1426. Accessed February 14, 2023. https:\/\/www.sciencemagazinedigital.org\/sciencemagazine\/24_september_2021\/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=1727132#articleId1727132.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Waters, Colin N., Jan Zalasiewicz, Anthony D. Barnosky, Alejandro Cearreta, Agieszka Galuszka, Juliana A. Ivar Do Sul, Catherine Jeandel, et al. 2016 \u201cIs the Anthropocene Distinct from the Holocene?\u201d <em>Science <\/em>351 (6269): aad2622-1-10. DOI:<a class=\"rId145\" href=\"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aad2622\">10.1126\/science.aad2622<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Watson, Traci. 2017. \u201cAncient Bones Reveal Girl\u2019s Tough Life in Early Americas.\u201d <em>Nature <\/em>544 (7648): 15\u201316<em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wendt, Kathleen, A., Xianglei Li,, and R. Lawrence Edwards. 2021. \u201cUranium-Thorium Dating of Speleothems.\u201d Elements 17 (2): 87\u201392.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">White, Tim D. 1986. \u201cCut Marks on the Bodo Cranium: A Case of Prehistoric Defleshing.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 69 (4): 503\u2013509.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Williams, Linda D. 2004. <em>Earth Science Demystified<\/em>. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wilson, Andrew S., Timothy Taylor, Maria Constanza Ceruti, Jose Antonio Chavez, Johan Reinhard, Vaughan Grimes, Wolfram Meier-Augenstein, et al. 2007. \u201cStable Isotope and DNA Evidence for Ritual Sequences in Inca Child Sacrifice.\u201d <em>PNAS<\/em> 104 (42): 16456\u201316461.<\/p>\n<p>Zhang, J., Lyons, T. W., Li, C., Fang, X., Chen, Q., Botting, J., &amp; Zhang, Y. (2022). What triggered the late Ordovician mass extinction (Lome)? perspectives from geobiology and biogeochemical modeling. Global and Planetary Change, 216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gloplacha.2022.103917.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Acknowledgments<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">We are grateful to Lee Anne Zajicek, who coauthored the first edition. Her original contributions continue to be an integral part of this chapter. We thank the staff of the Maturango Museum, Ridgecrest, California. Specifically, for their generous help with photography and fossil images, we acknowledge Debbie Benson, executive director; Alexander K. Rogers, former archaeology curator; Sherry Brubaker, natural history curator; and Elaine Wiley, history curator. We thank Sharlene Paxton, a librarian at Cerro Coso Community College, Ridgecrest, California, for her guidance and expertise with OER and open-source images, and John Stenger-Smith and Claudia Sellers from Cerro Coso Community College, Ridgecrest, California, for their feedback on the chemistry and plant biology content. Finally, we thank William Zajicek and Lauren Zajicek, our community college students, for providing their impressions and extensive feedback on early drafts of the chapter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_946\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_946\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_948\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_948\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_942\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_942\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_950\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_950\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Amanda Wolcott Paskey, M.A., Cosumnes River College<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros, M.A., American River College<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Peyton Dagg, Bryana Henry, and Anoriel Jacques<\/h6>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\"><em>Chapter 11: Archaic Homo<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the main groupings of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as Neanderthals.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Explain how shifting environmental conditions required flexibility of adaptations, both anatomically and behaviourally.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Describe the unique anatomical and cultural characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens, <\/em>including Neanderthals, in contrast to other hominins.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Articulate how Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils fit into evolutionary trends including cranial capacity (brain size) development, cultural innovations, and migration patterns.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Identify the shared traits, regional variations, and local adaptations among Archaic <em>Homo sapiens.<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Detail the increased complexity and debates surrounding the classification of hominins in light of transitional species, species admixture, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Breaking the Stigma of the \"Caveman\"<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What do you think of when you hear the word \u201ccaveman\u201d? Perhaps you imagine a character from a film such as <em>The Croods<\/em>, <em>Tarzan<\/em>, and <em>Encino Man<\/em> or from the cartoon <em>The Flintstones<\/em>. Maybe you picture the tennis-playing, therapy-going hairy Neanderthals from Geico Insurance commercials. Or perhaps you imagine characters from <em>The Far Side<\/em> or <em>B.C.<\/em> comics. Whichever you picture, the character in your mind is likely stooped over with a heavy brow, tangled long locks and other body hair, and clothed in animal skins, if anything. They might be holding a club with a confused look on their face, standing at the entrance to a cave or dragging an animal carcass to a fire for their next meal (see Figure 12.1). You might have even signed up to take this course because of what you knew\u2014or expected to learn\u2014about \u201ccavemen.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 163px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/cdn.pixabay.com\/photo\/2013\/07\/13\/12\/36\/caveman-159964_1280.png\" alt=\"Free caveman beard man vector\" width=\"163\" height=\"317\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.1:\u00a0Cartoon illustration of a prehistoric \u201ccaveman\u201d, commonly used as a visual representation of early humans in the Stone Age. Credit: <em data-start=\"261\" data-end=\"293\">Caveman, Beard, Man, Primitive<\/em>\u00a0free to use under the Pixabay <a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/service\/license-summary\/\">Content License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">These images have long been the stigma and expectation about our ancestors at the transition to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Tracing back to works as early as Carl Linnaeus, scientists once propagated and advanced this imagery, creating a clear picture in the minds of early scholars that informed the general public, even through today, that Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, \u201ccavemen,\u201d were somehow fundamentally different and much less intelligent than we are now. Unfortunately, this view is overly simplistic, misleading, and incorrect. Understanding what Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were actually like requires a much more complex and nuanced picture, one that comes into sharper focus as continuing research uncovers more about the lives of our not-too-distant (and not-too-different) ancestors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The first characterizations of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> were formed from limited fossil evidence in a time when <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1582\">ethnocentric<\/a><\/strong> and species-centric perspectives (<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1583\">anthropocentrism<\/a><\/strong>) were more widely accepted and entrenched in both society and science. Today, scientists are working from a more complete fossil record from three continents (Africa, Asia, and Europe), and genetic evidence informs their analyses and conclusions. The existence of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> marks an exciting point in our lineage\u2014a point at which many modern traits had emerged and key refinements were on the horizon. Anatomically, humans today are not that much different from Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Changing Environment<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While modern climate change is of critical concern today due to its cause (human activity) and pace (unprecedentedly rapid), the existence of global climate change itself is not a recent phenomenon. The focus of this chapter, the Middle Pleistocene (roughly between 780 kya and 125 kya), is the time period in which Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears in the fossil record\u2014a time that witnessed some of the most drastic climatic changes in human existence. During this time period, there were 15 major and 50 minor glacial events in Europe, alone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What exactly is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1635\">glaciation<\/a><\/strong>? When scientists talk about glacial events, they are referring to the climate being in an ice age. This means that the ocean levels were much lower than today, because much of the earth\u2019s water was tied up in large glaciers or ice sheets. Additionally, the average temperature would have been much cooler, which would have better supported an Arctic or tundra-adapted plant-and-animal ecosystem in northern latitudes. The most interesting and relevant features of Middle Pleistocene glacial events are the sheer number of them and their repeated bouts: this era alternated between glacial periods and warmer periods, known as<strong> interglacials<\/strong>. In other words, the planet wasn\u2019t in an ice age the whole time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">You can see the dramatic and increasing fluctuations in temperature, recorded through <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_906\">foraminifera<\/a><\/strong>, in Figure 12.2. The distance between highs and lows demonstrates the severity of temperature shifts. Much as the Richter scale represents more intense earthquakes with more dramatic peaks, so too does this chart, which uses dramatic peaks to demonstrate intense temperature swings.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_346\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-346\" style=\"width: 1753px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-329\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/All_palaeotemps.png\" alt=\"The graph shows changes in Earth\u2019s temperature for the last 540 My.\" width=\"1753\" height=\"565\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-346\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.2: The Geologic Timescale and corresponding temperature shifts. Wide and rapid shifts took place during the Pleistocene (the second box from the right). More dramatic fluctuations depict greater severity of temperature shift. The Eocene, Pliocene, and Holocene epochs had more stable temperatures. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:All_palaeotemps.png\">All paleotemps<\/a> by Glen Fergus is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods are defined by Earth\u2019s average temperature being lower. Worldwide, temperatures are reduced, with cold areas becoming even colder. Huge portions of the landscape may have become inaccessible during glacial events due to the formation of glaciers and massive ice sheets. In Europe, the Scandinavian continental glacier covered what is today Ireland, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and some of continental Europe. Plant and animal communities shifted to lower latitudes along the periphery of ice sheets. Additionally, some new land was opened during glacials. Evaporation with little runoff reduced sea levels by as much as almost 150 meters, shifting coastlines outward by in some instances as much as almost 100 kilometers. Additionally, land became exposed that connected what were previously unconnected continents such as Africa into Yemen at the Gulf of Aden.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Glacial periods also affected equatorial regions and other regions that are today thought of as warmer or at least more temperate parts of the globe, including Africa. While these areas were not covered with glaciers, increased global glaciation resulted in lower sea levels and expanded coastlines. Cooler temperatures were accompanied by the drying of the climate, which caused significantly reduced rainfall, increased aridity, and the expansion of deserts. It is an interesting question to consider whether the same plants and animals that lived in these regions prior to the ice ages would be able to survive and thrive in this new climate. Plant and animal communities shifted in response to the changing climate, whenever possible.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Surviving During the Middle Pleistocene<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rather than a single selective force, the Middle Pleistocene was marked by periods of fluctuation, not just cold periods. Interglacials interrupted glaciations, reversing trends in sea level, coastline, temperature, precipitation, and aridity, as well as glacier size and location. Interglacials are marked by increased rainfall and a higher temperature, which causes built-up ice in glaciers to melt. This leads to glacial retreat, which is the shrinking of glaciers and the movement of the glaciers back toward the poles, as we\u2019ve seen in our lifetime. During interglacials, sea levels increase, flooding some previously exposed coastlines and continental connections. In addition, plant and animal communities shift accordingly, often finding more temperate climates to the north and less arid and more humid climates in the tropics (Van Andel and Tzedakis 1996).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientists have found that the Olorgesailie region in southern Kenya was at various times in the Middle Pleistocene a deep lake, a drought-dried lakebed with an area criss-crossed by small streams, and a grassland. While various animal species would have moved in and out of the area as the climate shifted, some animal species went extinct, and new, often related, species took up residence. The trend, scientists noted, was that animals with more specialized features went extinct and animals with more generalized features, such as animals we see today, survived in this changing climatic time period. For example, a zebra with specialized teeth for eating grass was ultimately replaced by a zebra that could eat both grass and other types of vegetation. If this small, localized example shows such a dramatic change in terms of the environment and the plant and animal biocommunities, what would have been the impact on humans?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is no way humans could have escaped the effects of Middle Pleistocene climate change, no matter what region of the world they were living in. As noted earlier, and as evidenced by what was seen in the other biotic communities, humans would have faced changing food sources as previous sources of food may have gone extinct or moved to a different latitude. Depending on where they were living, fresh water may have been limited. Durial glacials, lower sea levels would have given humans more land to live on, while the interglacials would have reduced the available land through the increase in rainfall and associated sea level rise. Dry land connections between the continents would have made movement from one continent to another by foot easier at times than today, although these passageways were not consistently available through the Middle Pleistocene due to the glacial\/interglacial cycle. Finally, as evidenced by the Olorgesailie region in Kenya, during the Middle Pleistocene animal species that were overly specialized to one particular type of environment were less likely to survive when compared to their more generalized counterparts. Evidence suggests that this same pattern may have held true for Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, in terms of their ability to survive this dramatic period of climate change.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Defining Characteristics of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> share our species name but are distinguished by the term \u201cArchaic\u201d as a way of recognizing both the long period of time between their appearance and ours, as well as the way in which human traits have continued to evolve over time\u2014making Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>look slightly different from us today, despite being considered the same species. Living throughout Africa, and the Middle East during the Middle Pleistocene, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are considered, in many ways, transitional between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>(see Figure 12.3). Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> share the defining trait of an increased brain size of at least 1,100 cc and averaging 1,200 cc, although there are significant regional and temporal (time) variations. Because of these variations, scientists disagree on whether these fossils represent a single, variable species or multiple, closely related species (sometimes called <em>Homo antecessor<\/em>,<em> Homo bodoensis, Homo heidelbergensis<\/em>,<em> Homo georgicus<\/em>,<em> Homo neanderthalensis<\/em>, and <em>Homo rhodesiensis<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">An active area of scholarship in the discipline involves reconciling the diversity of species from this time period and establishing the phylogenetic relationships between them. The term \u201cArchaic <em>Homo sapiens\u201d <\/em>can mean different things to different scholars within the discipline. The intent of this chapter is to provide an understanding of the diversity of this time period and provide data used to make interpretations from among the most likely possibilities. Although we recognize that some anthropologists split many of these fossils into separate species, until the issue is resolved at the discipline level, this chapter will rely on the widely used naming conventions that refer to many fossils from this time period as Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. We will discuss these contemporaneous fossils as a unit<em>, <\/em>with the exception of a particularly unique population living in Europe and West Asia known as the Neanderthals, which we will examine separately.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 12.3: A comparison of Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. This table compares key traits of the crania and postcrania that distinguish these three hominins. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Homo erectus, Archaic Homo sapiens, and anatomically modern Homo sapiens table (Figure 11.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trait<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><em>Homo <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>erectus<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Archaic <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens <\/em><\/strong><strong>(including Neaderthals)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anatomically Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Time<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1.8 mya\u2013200,000 ya<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u201340,000 ya<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">315,000 ya\u2013today<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">900 cc<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc (1,500 cc when including Neanderthals)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,400 cc<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low,<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">angular<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and high, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1643\">globular<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Forehead<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal Region<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting nasal bones (bridge of the nose), no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wider nasal aperture and some midfacial prognathism, particularly pronounced among Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Narrower nasal aperture, no midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Chin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Absent<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Present<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Facial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge and large projecting face<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Intermediate<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small brow ridge and<strong> retracted face<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Skull Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nuchal torus, sagittal keel, thick cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Projecting occipital bone, often called occipital bun in Neanderthals; intermediate thickness of cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Small bump on rear of skull, if anything; thin cranial bone<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large teeth, especially front teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth; front teeth still large;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">retromolar gap in Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smaller teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">More gracile bones of skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When comparing <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, one can see that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> are intermediate in their physical form. For some features, this follows the trends first seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> with other features having early, less developed forms of traits seen in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. For example, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> trended toward less angular and higher skulls than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em><em>. <\/em>However, the archaic skulls were not as short and globular and had less developed foreheads compared to anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> had smaller brow ridges and a less-projecting face than <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and slightly smaller teeth, although incisors and canines were often about as large as those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>. Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>also had a wider <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1638\">nasal aperture<\/a><\/strong>, or opening for the nose, and a forward-projecting midfacial region, which is later seen more fully developed among Neanderthals and is known as <strong>midfacial prognathism<\/strong>. The occipital bone often projected and the cranial bone was of intermediate thickness, somewhat reduced from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> but not nearly as thin as that of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>The postcrania remained fairly robust. Identifying a set of features that is unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> is a challenging task, due to both individual and geographic variation\u2014these developments were not all present to the same degree in all individuals. Neanderthals are the exception, as they had several unique traits that made them notably different from modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> as well as their closely related Archaic cousins.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 299px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast.\" width=\"299\" height=\"299\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.4: \u201cBroken Hill Man,\u201d found at Kabwe in Zambia, shows common traits associated with archaic Homo sapiens in Africa, including a large brain, taller cranium, and Homo erectus-like features such as massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-broken-hill-1-rhodesian-man-BH-004\">Homo heidelbergensis Cranium Broken Hill 1 (Rhodesian Man)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The one thing that is clear about Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is that, despite general features, there is a lot of regional variation, which is first seen in the different <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> specimens across Asia and Africa. While the general features of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, identified earlier, are present in the fossils of this time period, there are significant regional differences. The majority of this regional variation lies in the degree to which fossils have features more closely aligned with <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> or with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 244px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-5.png\" alt=\"Side view of the Dali cranium.\" width=\"244\" height=\"213\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.5: Dali cranium, found at Dali, China, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Asia, including large and robust features with heavy brow ridges like Homo erectus and a large cranial capacity intermediate between Homo erectus and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. Credit: Dali skull original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) by <a href=\"https:\/\/marynelsonstudio.com\">Mary Nelson<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>To illustrate this point, we will examine three exemplary specimens, one from each of the three continents on which Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived. First, in Africa, a specimen from Broken Hill is one of several individuals found in the Kabwe lead mine in Zambia. It had a large brain (1,300 cc) and taller cranium as well as many <em>Homo erectus-<\/em>like skull features, including massive brow ridges, a large face, and thick cranial bones (Figure 12.4). Second, one partial crania from Dali, China, is representative of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>in Asia, with large and robust features with heavy brow ridges, akin to what is seen in <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a large cranial capacity intermediate between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Figure 12.5). Third, an almost-complete skeleton was found in northern Spain at Atapuerca. Atapuerca 5 (Figure 12.6) has thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, and a more rounded cranium than seen previously. Additionally, Atapuerca 5 demonstrates features that foreshadow Neanderthals, including increased midfacial prognathism. After examining some of the fossils such as those from Kabwe, Dali, and Atapuerca, the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is clear: their features place them squarely between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 293px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-4.png\" alt=\"Archaic Homo sapiens skull cast with mandible.\" width=\"293\" height=\"293\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.6: Atapuerca 5 archaic Homo sapiens, found in northern Spain, is representative of traits seen in archaic Homo sapiens in Europe, including a thick cranial bone, an enlarged cranial capacity, intermediate cranial height, a more rounded cranium, and increased midfacial projection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-heidelbergensis-skull-atapuerca-5-BH-022\">Homo heidelbergensis Skull Atapuerca 5<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Due to the transitional nature of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, identifying the time period with which they are associated is problematic and complex. Generally, it is agreed that Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>lived between 600,000 and 200,000 years ago, with regional variation and overlap between <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> on the early end of the spectrum and modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>and Neanderthals on the latter end. The earliest-known Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>fossils tentatively date to about 600,000 years ago in Africa, to around 300,000 years ago in Asia, and to about 350,000 years ago in Europe (and potentially as early as 600,000 years ago). Determining the end point of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also problematic since it largely depends upon when the next subspecies of <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>appears and the classification of highly intermediate specimens. For example, in Africa, the end of Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is met with the appearance of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, while in Europe it is the appearance of Neanderthals that is traditionally seen as marking the transition from other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to remember that this time period is represented by many branching relationships and assuming an evolutionary trajectory that follows a single linear path would not be correct. Even still, Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>mark an important chapter in the human lineage, connecting more ancestral forms, such as <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. During this period of climatic transition and fluctuation, Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> mirror the challenges of their environments. Showing increasing regional variation due to the need for local adaptation, there is no single archetype for this group; the defining characteristic seems to be variability.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One well-known population of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>are the Neanderthals, named after the site where they were first discovered in the Neander Valley, or \u201cthal\u201d in German, located near Dusseldorf, Germany. Popularly known as the stereotypical \u201ccavemen\u201d examined at the outset of this chapter, recent research is upending long-held beliefs about this group of Archaics. Neanderthal behaviour was increasingly complex, far beyond what was exhibited by even other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> discussed throughout this chapter. We implore you to forget the image of the iconic caveman and have an open mind when exploring the fossil evidence of the Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is important to understand why Neanderthals are separated from other Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Unlike the rest of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals are easily defined and identified in many ways. Evidence suggests the time period when Neanderthals lived was between 150,000 and 40,000 years ago. There is a clear geographic boundary of where Neanderthals lived: western Europe, the Middle East, and western Asia. No Neanderthal fossils have ever been discovered outside of this area, including Africa. This is a bit curious, as other Archaics seem to have adapted in Africa and then migrated elsewhere, but Neanderthals\u2019 regional association makes sense in light of the environment to which they were best adapted: namely, extreme cold weather. Additionally, Neanderthals have a unique and distinct cluster of physical characteristics. While a few aspects of Neanderthals are shared among some Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, such as the types of tools, most Neanderthal anatomical and behavioural attributes are unique to them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals lived during some of the coldest times during the last Ice Age and at far northern latitudes. This means Neanderthals were living very close to the glacial edge, rather than in a more temperate region of the globe like some of their Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> relatives. While able to survive in arctic conditions, most Neanderthal sites dating to the glacial periods were found farther away from the severe cold, in a steppe tundra-like environment, which would have been more hospitable to Neanderthals, and their food sources, both flora and fauna (Ashton 2002; Nicholson 2017; Richter 2006). Their range likely expanded and contracted along with European glacial events, moving into the Middle East during glacial events when Europe became even cooler, and when the animals they hunted would have moved for the same reason. During interglacials, when Europe warmed a bit, Neanderthals and their prey would have been able to move back into Western Europe. Clearly, the true hallmark of Neanderthals is their adaptation to an unstable environment, shifting between warm and cold, as the climate was in constant flux throughout their existence (Adler Et al. 2003; Boettger Et al. 2009).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Many of the Neanderthals\u2019 defining physical features are more extreme and robust versions of traits seen in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>, clustered in this single population. Brain size, namely an enlargement of the cranial capacity, is one such trait. The average Neanderthal brain size is around 1,500 cc, and the range for Neanderthal brains can extend to upwards of 1,700 cc. The majority of the increase in the brain occurs in the occipital region, or the back part of the brain, resulting in a skull that has a large cranial capacity with a distinctly long and low shape that is slightly wider than previous forms at the far back of the skull. Modern humans have a brain size comparable to that of Neanderthals; however, our brain expansion occurred in the frontal region of the brain, not the back, as in Neanderthal brains. This difference is also the main reason why Neanderthals lack the vertical forehead that modern humans possess. They simply did not need an enlarged forehead, because their brain expansion occurred in the rear of their brain. Due to cranial expansion, the back of the Neanderthal skull is less angular (as compared to <em>Homo erectus<\/em>), but not as rounded as <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, producing an elongated shape, akin to a football.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Another feature that continues the trend noted in previous hominins is the enlargement of the nasal region, or the nose. Neanderthal noses are large and have a wide nasal aperture, which is the opening for the nose. While the nose is only made up of two bones, the nasals, the true size of the nose can be determined by looking at other facial features, including the nasal aperture, and the angle of the nasal and maxillary, or facial bones. In Neanderthals, these indicate a large, forward-projecting nose that appears to be pulled forward away from the rest of the face. This feature is further emphasized by the backward-sloping nature of the cheekbones, or the zygomatic arches. The unique shape and size of the Neanderthal nose is often characterized by the term <em>midfacial prognathism<\/em>\u2014a jutting out of the middle portion of the face, or nose. This is in sharp contrast to the prognathism exhibited by other hominins, who exhibited prognathism, or the jutting out, of their jaws.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The teeth of the Neanderthals follow a similar pattern seen in the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, which is an overall reduction in size, especially as compared to the extremely large teeth seen in the genus <em>Australopithecus<\/em>. However, while the teeth continued to reduce, the jaw size did not keep pace, leaving Neanderthals with an oversized jaw for their teeth, and a gap between their final molar and the end of their jaw. This gap is called a <strong>retromolar gap<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The projecting occipital bone present in other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>is also more prominent in Neanderthals, extending the trend found in Archaics. Among Neanderthals, this projection of bone is easily identified by its bun shape on the back of the skull and is known as an <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1645\">occipital bun<\/a><\/strong>. This projection appears quite similar to a dinner roll in size and shape. Its purpose, if any, remains unknown.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Continuing the Archaic<em> Homo sapiens <\/em>trend, Neanderthal brow ridges are prominent but somewhat smaller in size than those of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em> and earlier Archaic<em> Homo sapiens. <\/em>In Neanderthals, the brow ridges are also often slightly less arched than those of other Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In addition to extending traits present in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens, <\/em>Neanderthals possess several distinct traits. Neanderthal <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1646\">infraorbital foramina<\/a><\/strong>, the holes in the maxillae or cheek bones through which blood vessels pass, are notably enlarged compared to other hominins. The Neanderthal postcrania are also unique in that they demonstrate increased robusticity in terms of the thickness of bones and body proportions that show a barrel-shaped chest and short, stocky limbs, as well as increased musculature. These body portions are seen across the spectrum of Neanderthals\u2014in men, women, and children.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Traditionally, many of the unique traits that Neanderthals possess were seen as adaptations to the extreme cold, dry environments in which they often lived and which exerted strong selective forces. For example, Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules dictate that an increased body mass and short, stocky limbs are common in animals that live in cold conditions. Neanderthals were said to have matched the predictions of Bergmann\u2019s and Allen\u2019s Rules perfectly (Churchill 2006). In addition, the Neanderthal skull also exhibits adaptations to the cold. Neanderthals\u2019 large infraorbital foramina allow for larger blood vessels, increasing the volume of blood that is found closest to the skin, which helps to keep the skin warmer. Their enlarged noses resulted in longer nasal passages and mucus membranes that warmed and moistened cold air before it reached the lungs. The Neanderthals\u2019 larger nose has long been thought to have acted as a humidifier, easing physical exertion in their climate, although research on this particular trait continues to be studied and debated (Rae Et al. 2011).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">New research, however, seems to suggest that these unique skeletal adaptations might not have been strict adaptations to cold weather (Evteev Et al. 2017; Pearce Et al. 2013). For example, large brow ridges might have served as a way to shade the face from the sun. The increased occipital portion of the brain, some researchers state, was to support a larger visual system present in Neanderthals. This visual system would have given them increased light sensitivity, which would have been useful in higher latitudes that had dark winters. And, while recent modeling of nostril airflow on reconstructed Neanderthal specimens supports the notion that Neanderthals had extensive mucus membranes inside their noses, the data shows that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are superior to Neanderthals in our ability to use our noses as a way to warm and cool air. However, Neanderthals were able to snort air through their noses better than we can. Why is this important? When combined with the fact that Neanderthals tended to prefer a more temperate, tundra-like environment, and that other physical traits suggest that Neanderthals had huge bodies that needed massive amounts of calories to sustain them, the picture gets clearer. Massive amounts of energy would have been required to power a Neanderthal body, and anything that might have made them more calorically efficient would have been favoured. Efficient breathing, through larger noses into large lungs, meaning deeper breaths, would have been favoured. To further save energy expenditure, body sizes might have been sacrificed as well. These same types of adaptations are similar to ones seen in children today who are born in high altitudes, not cold climates. Figure 12.7 provides a summary of these unique features of the Neanderthal.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<caption>Figure 12.7: Neanderthal distinguishing features. This table outlines key features associated with Neanderthals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Neanderthal distinguishing features table (Figure 11.6)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Amanda Wolcott Paskey and AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 21pt\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\" colspan=\"2\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Distinct Neanderthal Anatomical Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skull Shape<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Long and low<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brow Ridge Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nose Size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large, with midfacial prognathism<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced, but large jaw size, creating retromolar gap<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital Region<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Enlarged occipital region, occipital bun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other Unique Cranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large infraorbital foramina<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table2-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial Features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table2-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel-shaped chest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A classic example of a Neanderthal with all of the characteristics mentioned above is the nearly complete La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal, from France. This is a male skeleton, with a brain size of around 1640cc, an extremely large nose and infraorbital foramina, brow ridges that are marked in size, and an overall robust skeleton (Figure 12.8).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 390px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-4.png\" alt=\"A reproduction of a complete Neanderthal skeleton.\" width=\"390\" height=\"689\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.8: La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal is representative of many classic Neanderthal features, including a large brain, large nose, large infraorbital foramina, large brow ridges, and robust postcrania. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/neanderthal-skeleton-articulated-SC-019-A\">Neanderthal Skeleton Articulated<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Tool Making and Use<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One key Neanderthal adaptation was their cultural innovations, which are an important way that hominins adapt to their environment. As you recall, <em>Homo erectus<\/em>'s tools, Acheulean handaxes, represented an increase in complexity over Oldowan tools, allowing more efficient removal of meat and possibly calculated scavenging. In contrast, Neanderthal tools mark a significant innovation in tool-making technique and use with <strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong> (named after the Le Moustier site in southwest France). These tools were significantly smaller, thinner, and lighter than Acheulean handaxes and formed a true toolkit. The materials used for Mousterian tools were of higher quality, which allowed for both more precise toolmaking and tool reworking when the tools broke or dulled after frequent reuse. The use of higher-quality materials is also indicative of required forethought and planning to acquire them for tool manufacture. It has been suggested that the Neanderthals, unlike <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, saved and reused their tools, rather than making new ones each time a tool was needed.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 290px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-4.png\" alt=\"Large flakes separated from the core.\" width=\"290\" height=\"159\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.9: The Levallois technique is used to create Mousterian tools. The multistep process involves preparing the core in a specific way to yield flakes that can be used as tools. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nucl%C3%A9us_Levallois_La-Parrilla.png\">Nucl\u00e9us Levallois La-Parrilla<\/a> by Jos\u00e9-Manuel Benito \u00c1lvarez is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.5\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.5 License<\/a>..<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mousterian tools are constructed in a very unique manner, utilizing the <strong>Levallois technique<\/strong> (Figure 12.9), named after the first finds of tools made with this technique, which were discovered in the Levallois-Perret suburb of Paris, France. The Levallois technique is a multistep process that requires preparing the core, or raw material, in a specific way that will yield flakes that are roughly uniform in dimension. The flakes are then turned into individual tools. The preparation of the core is akin to peeling a potato or carrot with a vegetable peeler\u2014when peeling vegetables, you want to remove the skin in long, regular strokes, so that you are taking off the same amount of the vegetable all the way around. In the same way, the Levallois technique requires removing all edges of the <strong>cortex<\/strong>, or outside surface of the raw material, in a circle before removing the lid. The flakes, which will eventually be turned into the individual tools, can then be removed from the core. The potential yield of tools from one core would be many, as seen in Figure 12.10, compared to all previous tool-making processes, in which one core yielded a single tool. This manufacturing process might be considered the ultimate zero-waste tool-making technique (Delpiano Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 589px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-4.png\" alt=\"Levallois core and flakes that are gray in color and various shapes and sizes.\" width=\"589\" height=\"470\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.10: Levallois core and flakes for tool production. Using this technique, one core is used to produce many flakes, each of which can be turned into a tool. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:NHM_-_Levalloiskern.jpg\">NHM - Levalloiskern<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Xenophon\">Wolfgang Sauber<\/a> (user: Xenophon) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It is suggested that Neanderthal tools were used for a variety of purposes, including cutting, butchering, woodworking or antler working, and hide working. Additionally, because the Mousterian tools were lighter than previous stone tools, Neanderthals could <strong>haft<\/strong>, or attach the tool onto a handle, as the stone would not have been too heavy (Degano Et al. 2019). Neanderthals attached small stone blades onto short wood or antler handles to make knives or other small weapons, as well as attached larger blades onto longer shafts to make spears. New research examining tar-covered stones and black lumps at several Neanderthal sites in Europe suggests that Neanderthals may have been making tar by distilling it from birch tree bark, which could have been used to glue the stone tool onto its handle. If Neanderthals were, in fact, manufacturing tar to act as glue, this would predate modern humans in Africa using tree resin or similar adhesives by nearly 100,000 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evidence shows that raw materials used by Neanderthals came from distances as far away as 100 km. This could indicate a variety of things regarding Neanderthal behaviour, including a limited trade network with other Neanderthal groups or simply a large area scoured by Neanderthals when collecting raw materials. While research on specific applications continues, it should be clear from this brief discussion that Neanderthal tool manufacturing was much more complex than previous tool-making efforts, requiring technical expertise, patience, and skills beyond toolmaking to carry out.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Hunting and Diet<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">With their more sophisticated suite of tools and robust muscular bodies, Neanderthals were better armed for hunting than previous hominins. The animal remains in Neanderthal sites show that, unlike earlier Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals were very effective hunters who were able to kill their own prey, rather than relying on scavenging. Though more refined than the tools of earlier hominins, the Neanderthal spear was not the kind of weapon that would have been thrown; rather, it would have been used in a jabbing fashion (Churchill 1998; Kortlandt 2002). This may have required Neanderthals to hunt in groups rather than individually and made it necessary to approach their prey quite closely (Gaudzinski-Windheuser Et al. 2018). Remember, the animals living with Neanderthals were very large-bodied due to their adaptations to cold weather; this would have included species of deer, horses, and bovids (relatives of the cow).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Isotopes from Neanderthal bones show that meat was a significant component of their diet, similar to that seen in carnivores like wolves (Bocherens Et al. 1999; Jaouen Et al. 2019; Richards Et al. 2000). In addition to large prey, their diet included ibex, seals, rabbits, and pigeons. Though red meat was a critical component of the Neanderthal diet, evidence shows that at times they also ate limpets, mussels, and pine nuts. Tartar examined from Neanderthal teeth in Iraq and Belgium reveal that they also ate plant material including wheat, barley, date palms, and tubers, first cooking them to make them palatable (Henry Et al. 2010). While Neanderthals\u2019 diet varied according to the specific environment in which they lived, meat comprised up to 80% of their diet (Wi\u1e9ein Et al. 2015).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Caring for the Injured and Sick<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While the close-range style of hunting used by Neanderthals was effective, it also had some major consequences. Many Neanderthal skeletons have been found with significant injuries, which could have caused paralysis or severely limited their mobility. Many of the injuries are to the head, neck, or upper body. Thomas Berger and Erik Trinkaus (1995) conducted a statistical comparative analysis of Neanderthal injuries compared to those recorded in modern-day workers\u2019 compensation reports and found that the closest match was between Neanderthal injuries and those of rodeo workers. Rodeo professionals have a high rate of head and neck injuries that are similar to the Neanderthals\u2019 injuries. What do Neanderthals and rodeo workers have in common? They were both getting very close to large, strong animals, and at times their encounters went awry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The extensive injuries sustained by Neanderthals are evident in many fossil remains. Shanidar 1 (Figure 12.11), an adult male found at the Shanidar site in northern Iraq and dating to 45,000 ya, has a lifetime of injuries recorded in his bones (Stewart 1977). Shanidar 1 sustained\u2014and healed from\u2014an injury to the face that would have likely caused blindness. His lower right arm was missing and the right humerus shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. This pattern has been interpreted to indicate a substantial injury that required or otherwise resulted in amputation or wasting away of the lower arm. Additionally, Shanidar 1 suffered from bony growths in the inner ear that would have significantly impaired his hearing and severe arthritis in the feet. He also exhibited extensive anterior tooth wear, matching the pattern of wear found among modern populations who use their teeth as a tool. Rather than an anomaly, the type of injuries evident in Shanidar 1 are similar to those found in many other Neanderthal fossils, revealing injuries likely sustained from hunting large mammals as well as demonstrating a long life of physical activity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal skull.\" width=\"329\" height=\"329\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 330px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-4.png\" alt=\"Neaderthal right and left humerus. The right humerus is withered looking.\" width=\"330\" height=\"330\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.11a-b: a. The Shanidar 1 skull shows an injury to the face that would likely have caused blindness. b. The Shanidar 1 right humerus (on the left side of the image) shows severe atrophy, likely due to disuse. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/shanidar-1-skull-BH-050\">Homo neanderthalensis Shanidar 1 Skull<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>. b. <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/fossils\/shanidar-1\">Shanidar 1<\/a> by Chip Clark, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian Institution<\/a> [exhibit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\">Human Evolution <\/a>Evidence, Human Fossils, Species, Homo neanderthalensis] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The pattern of injuries is as significant as the fact that Shanidar 1 and other injured Neanderthals show evidence of having <em>survived<\/em> their severe injuries. One of the earliest-known Neanderthal discoveries\u2014the one on whom misinformed analysis shaped the stereotype of the species for nearly a century\u2014is the La Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal (Trinkaus 1985). The La Chapelle Neanderthal had a damaged eye orbit that likely caused blindness and suffered arthritis of the spine (Dawson and Trinkaus 1997). He had also lost most of his teeth, many of which he had lived without for so long that the mandibular and maxillary bones were partially reabsorbed due to lack of use. The La Chapelle Neanderthal was also thought to be at least in his mid-forties at death, an old age for the rough life of the Late Pleistocene\u2014giving rise to his nickname, \u201cthe Old Man.\u201d To have survived so long with so many injuries that obviously precluded successful large game hunting, he must have been taken care of by others. Such caretaking behaviour is also evident in the survival of other seriously injured Neanderthals, such as Shanidar 1. Long thought to be a hallmark modern human characteristic, taking care of the injured and elderly, for example preparing or pre-chewing food for those without teeth, indicates strong social ties among Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Ritual Life<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Such care practices may have been expressed upon death as well. Nearly complete Neanderthal skeletons are not uncommon in the fossil record, and most are well preserved within apparently deliberate burials that involve deep graves and bodies found in specific, often fetal or <strong>flexed positions<\/strong> (Harrold 1980)<strong>.<\/strong> Discoveries of pollen in a grave at the Shanidar site in the 1960s led scientists to think that perhaps Neanderthals had placed flowering plants in the grave, an indication of ritual ceremony or spirituality so common in modern humans. But more recent investigations have raised some doubt about this conclusion (Pomeroy Et al. 2020). The pollen may have been brought in by burrowing rodents. Claims of <strong>grave goods<\/strong> or other ornamentation in burials are similarly debated, although possible.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some tantalizing evidence for symbolism, and debatably, ritual, is the frequent occurrence of natural pigments, such as <strong>ochre<\/strong> (red) and manganese dioxide (black) in Neanderthal sites that could have been used for art. However, the actual uses of pigments are unclear, as there is very little evidence of art or paintings in Mousterian sites. One exception may be the recent discovery in Spain of a perforated shell that appears to be painted with an orange pigment, which may be evidence of Neanderthal art and jewelry. However, many pigments also have properties that make them good emulsifiers in adhesive (like for attaching a stone tool to a wooden handle) or useful in tanning hides. So the presence of pigment may or may not be associated with symbolic thought; however, it definitely does show a technological sophistication beyond that of earlier Archaic hominins.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Dig Deeper: Evidence of Endocannibalism Among the Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p>Krapina, a Neanderthal site in Croatia, has recently sparked new archeological discourse as many investigations upon fossilized remains show evidence of post-mortem modifications and manipulations of limbs and bones through the use of tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). These findings provide compelling evidence of Neanderthals engaging in cannibalism as part of their post-mortem practices. Additionally, these uncovered remains were found to have died of natural causes as opposed to being killed, showing that even the earliest humans may have had some sort of morality or ethics surrounding the cannibalizing of their kin, meaning they were aware of death in a social context as opposed to merely a physical one.<\/p>\n<p>While the original evidence in Krapina was uncovered in 1901, Croatian geologist and paleontologist Dragutin Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s discovery of fragmented and burned human bones (Ullrich, 2005) was not yet confirmed to be linked to endocannibalism until much later. Whereas the discovery of burned bones does not mean they were being prepared for consummation, due to its context among other findings, this information supports the hypothesis that early hominids conducted post-mortem rituals and practices with their dead. Building on Gorjanovi\u0107-Kramberger\u2019s research, Herbert Ullrich wrote in <em>Anthropologie<\/em> (2005) that broken bones\u2014resulting from post-mortem bodily manipulations\u2014were \u201cdefleshed in preparation for secondary burial\u201d (2005, 251) and intentionally left outside rock shelters, while selectively chosen bones were seemingly brought inside for use in mortuary practices.<\/p>\n<p>For nearly 150 years, since the first Neanderthal skeletal remains were discovered, anthropologists and researchers have continued to debate the cognitive, social, and physical abilities of this species. In 2016, Rougier and colleagues wrote in <em>Scientific Reports<\/em>, furthering the research, presenting 99 new Neanderthal remains found in Goyet, Belgium. Among these remains, similar evidence of human-induced alterations was identified, including signs of butchering, consumption, and the use of bones to modify stone tools (Rougier Et al., 2016). This discovery provides significant support for the presence of cannibalistic behaviour among Northern European Neanderthals, contributing to the growing body of evidence that Neanderthals engaged with death in ways that reflect social awareness, ritual behaviour, and complex cultural practices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Contemporary Cases of Prion Disease Related to Endocannibalism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The evidence of endocannibalism does not end with early hominids; with Australian medical anthropologists recording thousands of cannibalism-related prion disease occurrences present in populations up until 2009 (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013). Following a mysterious epidemic of a new form of spongiform encephalopathy\u2013a \u201cprogressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system\u201d (2013, p.29)\u2013anthropological research regarding the the cultural mortuary rites within the Okapa region of Papua New Guinea have linked the newfound disease \u2018Kuru\u2019 to post-mortem consumption of human remains (Radford &amp; Scragg, 2013; Collinge Et al., 2006).<\/p>\n<p>Local oral histories collected during the first investigations by these researchers in the 1950s traced the earliest cases back to the 1920s, with detailed case histories. Epidemiological data revealed a strong correlation between the spread of Kuru and participation in mortuary feasts, in which the deceased were ritually consumed as part of funerary rites (2006, p. 2070). From 1957 to 2004, over 2,700 cases were reported, with mortality peaking at over 200 deaths annually in the late 1950s (2006, p.2070); however, following the cessation of cannibalism in the easly 1960s due to governmental efforts, natural transmission of the disease has stopped, dropping the death toll dramatically, with the \u201clast three single cases reported in 2005, 2007, and 2009\u201d (Radford &amp; Scragg, p.48).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Lasting Gift of Neanderthals: Tantalizing New Directions for Resear<\/strong><strong>ch<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Examining the more recent time period in which Neanderthals lived and the extensive excavations completed across Europe allows for a much more complete archaeological record from this time period. Additionally, the increased cultural complexity such as complex tools and ritual behaviours expressed by Neanderthals left a more detailed record than previous hominins. Intentional burials enhanced preservation of the dead and potentially associated ritual behaviours. Such evidence allows for a more complete and nuanced picture of this species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 424px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-5.png\" alt=\"Museum exhibition of life-sized Neanderthal figure.\" width=\"424\" height=\"469\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.12: Artistic reconstruction of Neanderthal at The Natural History Museum in Vienna, Austria. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_neanderthalensis,_The_Natural_History_Museum_Vienna,_20210730_1223_1272.jpg\">Homo neanderthalensis, The Natural History Museum Vienna, 20210730 1223 1272<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Jakubhal\">Jakub Ha\u0142un<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Additional analyses are possible on many Neanderthal finds, due to increased preservation of bone, the amount of specimens that have been uncovered, and the recency in which Neanderthals lived. We should be cautious, however, to consider the potential bias of many Neanderthal sites. Overwhelmingly, Neanderthal skeletons are found complete, with injuries or evidence of disease in caves. Does this mean all Neanderthals lived a tough, disease-wrought life? Probably not. It does, however, indicate that the sick were cared for by others, and that they lived in environments that preserved their bodies incredibly well. These additional studies include the examination of dental calculus and even DNA analysis. While limited, samples of Neanderthal DNA have been successfully extracted and analyzed. Research thus far has identified specific genetic markers that show some Neanderthals were light-skinned and probably red-haired with light eyes. Genetic analyses, different from the typical hominin reconstruction done with earlier species, allow scientists to further investigate soft tissue markers of Neanderthals and other more recent hominin species. These studies offer striking conclusions regarding Neanderthal traits, their physical appearance, and their culture, as reflected in these artists\u2019 reconstructions (Figure 12.12).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 258px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo in a blue suit and red tie.\" width=\"258\" height=\"368\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.13: Nobel Prize winner (2022) and pioneer in paleogenomic research, Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/2\/26\/Professor_Svante_Paabo_ForMemRS_%28cropped%29.jpg\">Professor Svante Paabo ForMemRS (cropped)<\/a> by Duncan.Hull is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo (Figure 12.13), of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, has been at the forefront of much of this new research, largely in the form of genomic studies (The Nobel Prize 2022). Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 2022, P\u00e4\u00e4bo is known primarily for his work with ancient DNA. He has successfully sequenced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as well as the entire Neanderthal genome from nuclear DNA. His genomic work has led to the realization that Denisovans are genetically distinct from Neanderthals, as well as the recent identification of a Neanderthal father and teenage daughter, which he discovered by looking for unique DNA markers in the fossil record. Additionally, P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s genomic work has provided researchers with additional lines of evidence regarding the connections between hominin fossils (such as Neanderthals) and modern people, their time of divergence, and current genetic overlap. The work of P\u00e4\u00e4bo has even formalized a new field of study within anthropology\u2014paleogenomics. To stay up to date with Dr. Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo\u2019s work, be sure to follow his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">lab\u2019s website<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Culture: Communicating through Speech<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">To successfully live in groups and to foster cultural innovations, Neanderthals would have required at least a basic form of communication in order to function, possibly using a speech-based communication system. The challenge with this line of research is that speech, of course, is not preserved, so indirect evidence must be used to support this conclusion. It is thought that Neanderthals would have possessed some basic speech, as evidenced from a variety of sources, including throat anatomy and genetic evidence (Lieberman 1971). There is only one bone in the human body that could demonstrate if a hominin was able to speak, or produce clear vocalizations like modern humans, and that is the hyoid, a U-shaped bone that is found in the throat and is associated with the ability to precisely control the vocal cords. Very few hyoid bones have been found in the archaeological record; however, a few have been uncovered in Neanderthal burials. The shape of the Neanderthal hyoid is nearly identical to that of modern humans, pointing to the likelihood that they had the same vocal capabilities as modern humans. In addition, geneticists have uncovered a mutation present in both modern humans and Neanderthals\u2014the FOXP2 gene\u2014that is possibly linked to the ability to speak. However, other scientists argue that we cannot make sweeping conclusions that the FOXP2 gene accounts for speech due to small sample size. Finally, scientists have also pointed to the increasingly complex cultural behaviour of Neanderthals as a sign that symbolic communication, likely through speech, would have been the only way to pass down the skills needed to make, for example, a Levallois blade or to position a body for intentional burial.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neanderthal Intelligence<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">One of the enduring questions about Neanderthals centers on their intelligence, specifically in comparison to modern humans. Brain volume indicates that Neanderthals certainly had a large brain, but it continues to be debated if Neanderthals were of equal intelligence to modern humans. Remember, creatures with larger body sizes tend to have larger brains; however, scaling of the brain is not always associated with greater intelligence (Alex 2018). Brain volume (cranial capacity), cultural complexity, tool use, and compassion toward their kind all point to an increase in intellect among Neanderthals when compared to previous hominins.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Yet, new research is suggesting additional differences between Neanderthal brains and our own. For example, Euluned Pearce and colleagues (2013), from the University of Oxford, noted the frontal lobes of Neanderthals and modern humans are almost identical. However, Neanderthals had a larger visual cortex\u2014the portion of the brain involved in processing visual information. This would have left Neanderthals with less brain tissue for other functions, including those that would have aided them in dealing with large social groupings, one of the differences that has been suggested to exist between Neanderthals and modern humans. Other differences were found when geneticist John Blangero, from the Texas Biomedical Research Institute, compared data from the Neanderthal genome against data from modern study participants. Blangero and his colleagues (Blangero Et al. 2014) discovered that some Neanderthal brain components were very different, and smaller, than those in the modern sample. Differences were found in areas associated with the processing of information and controlling emotion and motivation, as well as overall brain connectivity. In short, as Blangero stated, \u201cNeanderthals were certainly cognitively adept,\u201d although their specific abilities may have differed from modern humans\u2019 in key areas (qtd. in Wong 2015). This point has been echoed in other recent genetic studies comparing Neanderthal and anatomically modern human brains (el-Showk 2019).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Finally, scientists are fairly certain that Neanderthal brain development after birth was not the same as that of modern humans. After birth, anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>babies go through a critical period of brain expansion and cognitive development. It appears that Neanderthal babies\u2019 brains and bodies did not follow the same developmental pattern (Smith Et al. 2010; Zollikofer and Ponce de Le\u00f3n 2013). Modern humans enjoy an extended period of childhood, which allows children to engage in imaginative play and develop creativity that fosters cognitive skills. Neanderthals had a more limited childhood, with less development of the creative mind that may have affected their species\u2019 success (Nowell 2016).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The exact nature of Neanderthal intelligence remains under investigation, however. Some studies disagree with the idea that Neanderthal intelligence had limitations compared to our own, noting the extensive evidence of Neanderthals having limb asymmetry. Their tools also have wear marks indicating that they were hand-dominant. This is further supported by marks on Neanderthal teeth that demonstrate hand dominance. The Neanderthal \u201cstuff-and-cut method\u201d of eating, noted by David Frayer and colleagues (Frayer Et al. 2012), would have seen Neanderthals hold a piece of meat in their teeth, while pulling it taut with one hand, and then using the other hand, their dominant one, to cut the meat off of the larger slab being held in their teeth. When looking at 17 Neanderthals and their tooth wear, only two do not show markings associated with a right-hand dominant individual eating in this manner. Further, it has been established that favouring the right hand is a key marker between modern humans and chimpanzees, and that handedness also relates to language development, in the form of bilateral brain development. That Neanderthals likely were hand-dominant suggests they had an indicator of bilateral brain development and a precondition for human speech.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Middle Stone Age: Neanderthal Contemporaries in Africa<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals made their home on and adapted to the European and Asian continents, evidence of fossil humans in Africa show they were also adapting to their local environments. These populations in Africa exhibit many more similarities to modern humans than Neanderthals, as well as overall evolutionary success. While the African fossil sample size is smaller and more fragmentary than the number of Neanderthal specimens across Europe and Asia, the African sample is interesting in that it represents a longer time period and larger geographical area. This group of fossils\u2014often represented by the name \u201cMiddle Stone Age,\u201d or MSA\u2014dates to between 300,000 and 30,000 years ago across the entire continent of Africa. As with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, there is much variability seen in this African set of fossils. There are also a few key consistent elements: none of them exhibit Neanderthal skeletal features; instead, they demonstrate features that are increasingly consistent with anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Similarities to Neanderthals and MSA contemporaries in Africa are seen, however, in their behavioural adaptations, including stone tools and other cultural elements. The tools associated with the specimens living in Africa during this time period are, like their physical features, varied. In some parts of Africa, namely Northern Africa, stone tools from this time so closely resemble Neanderthal tools that they are classified as Mousterian. In sub-Saharan Africa, the stone tools associated with these specimens are labeled as MSA. Some scholars argue that these could also be a type of Mousterian tools, but they are still typically subdivided based on geographical location.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recall that Mousterian tools were much more advanced than their Acheulean predecessors in terms of how the stone tools were manufactured, the quality of the stones used, and the ultimate use of the tools that were made. In addition, recent evidence suggests that MSA tools may also have been heat treated\u2014to improve the quality of the stone tool produced (Stolarczyk and Schmidt 2018). Evidence for heat treating is seen not only through advanced analysis of the tool itself but also through the residue of fires from this time period. Fire residues show a shift over time from small, short fires fueled by grasses (probably intended for cooking) to larger, more intensive fires that required the exploitation of dry wood, exactly the type of fire that would have been needed for heat treating stone tools (Esteban Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other cultural elements seen with MSA specimens include the use of marine (sea-based) resources for their diet (Parkington 2003), manufacture of bone tools, use of adhesive and compound tools (e.g., hafted tools), shell bead production, engraving, use of pigments (such as ochre), and other more advanced tool-making technology (e.g., microlithics). While many of these cultural elements are also seen to a limited extent among Neanderthals, developments at MSA sites appear more complex. This MSA cultural expansion may have been a response to climate change or an increased use of language, complex communication, and\/or symbolic thought. Others have suggested that the MSA cultural expansion was due to the increase of marine resources in their diet, which included more fatty acids that may have aided their cognitive development. Still others have suggested that the increased cultural complexity was due to increased interaction among groups, which spurred competition to innovate. Recent studies suggest that perhaps the best explanation for the marked cultural complexity of MSA cultural artifacts is best explained by the simple fact that they lived in diverse habitats (Kandel Et al. 2015). This would have necessitated a unique set of cultural adaptations for each habitat type (for example, specialized marine tools would have been needed along coastal sites but not at inland locations). Simply put, the most useful adaptation of MSA was their flexibility of behaviour and adaptability to their local environment. As noted previously in this chapter, flexibility of behaviour and physical traits, rather than specialization, seems to be a feature that was favoured in hominin evolution at this time.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Where Did They Go? The End of Neanderthals<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While MSA specimens were increasingly successful and ultimately transitioned into modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record by around 40,000 years ago. What happened to them? We know, based on genetics, that modern humans come largely from the modern people who occupied Africa around 300,000 to 100,000 years ago, at the same time that Neanderthals were living in northern Europe and Asia. As you will learn in Chapter 13, modern humans expanded out of Africa around 150,000 years ago, rapidly entering areas of Europe and Asia inhabited by Neanderthals and other Archaic hominins. Despite intense interest and speculation in fictional works about possible interactions between these two groups, there is very little direct evidence of either peaceful coexistence or aggressive encounters. It is clear, though, that these two closely related hominins shared Europe for thousands of years, and recent DNA evidence suggests that they occasionally interbred (Fu Et al. 2015). Geneticists have found traces of Neanderthal DNA (as much as 1% to 4%) in modern humans of European and Asian descent not present in modern humans from sub-Saharan Africa. This is indicative of limited regional interbreeding with Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While some interbreeding likely occurred, as a whole, Neanderthals did not survive. What is the cause for their extinction? This question has fascinated many researchers and several <del>possibilities<\/del> <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">(theories)<\/span> have been suggested, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">At the time that Neanderthals were disappearing from the fossil record, the climate went through both cooling and warming periods\u2014each of which posed challenges for Neanderthal survival (Defleur and Desclaux 2019; Staubwasser Et al. 2018). It has been argued that as temperatures warmed, large-bodied animals, well adapted to cold weather, moved farther north to find colder environments or faced extinction. A shifting resource base could have been problematic for continued Neanderthal existence, especially as additional humans, in the form of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, began to appear in Europe and compete for a smaller pool of available resources.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the eruption of a European volcano 40,000 years ago could have put a strain on available plant resources (Golovanova Et al. 2010). The eruption would have greatly affected local microclimates, reducing the overall temperature enough to alter the growing season.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">Possible differences in cognitive development may have limited Neanderthals in terms of their creative problem solving. As much as they were biologically specialized for their environment, the nature of their intelligence might not have offered them the creative problem-solving skills to innovate ways to adapt their culture when faced with a changing environment (Pearce Et al. 2013).<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">CRISPR gene-editing technology has been used in studies to evaluate potential differences between human and Neanderthal brains, based on differences in the genetic code. Potential differences include a Neanderthal propensity for mutations related to brain development that could account for more rapid brain development, maturation, synapse misfires, and less-orderly neural processes (Mora-Berm\u00fadez Et al. 2022; Trujillo Et al. 2021). Fundamental differences in brain function at the cellular level may account for the differential survival rates of Neanderthal and modern human populations.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">There is evidence that suggests reproduction may have posed challenges for Neanderthals. Childbirth was thought to have been at least as difficult for female Neanderthals as anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Weaver and Hublin 2009). Female Neanderthals may have become sexually mature at an older age, even older than modern humans. This delayed maturation could have kept the Neanderthal population size small. A recent study has further suggested that male Neanderthals might have had a genetic marker on the Y chromosome that could have caused incompatibility between the fetus and mother during gestation; this would have had severe consequences for birth rate and survival (Mendez Et al. 2016). Even a small but continuous decrease in fertility would have been enough to result in the extinction of Neanderthals (Degioanni Et al. 2019).<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\">As mentioned above, the end of Neanderthal existence overlaps with modern human expansion into northern Europe and Asia. There is no conclusive direct evidence to indicate that Neanderthals and modern humans lived peacefully side by side, nor that they engaged in warfare, but by studying modern societies and the tendencies of modern humans, it has been suggested that modern humans may not have warmly embraced their close but slightly odd-looking cousins when they first encountered them (Churchill Et al. 2009). Nevertheless, direct competition with modern humans for the same resources may have contributed to the Neanderthals\u2019 decline (Gilpin Et al. 2016); it may also have exposed them to new diseases, brought by modern humans (Houldcroft and Underdown 2016), which further decimated their population. Estimates of energy expenditures suggest Neanderthals had slightly higher caloric needs than modern humans (Venner 2018). When competing for similar resources, the slightly greater efficiency of modern humans might have helped them experience greater success in the face of competition\u2014at a cost to Neanderthals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">It has been suggested that the Neanderthal populations were fairly small to begin with (estimated between 5,000 and 70,000 individuals; Bocquet-Appel and Degioanni 2013), one or a combination of these factors could have easily led to their demise. As more research is conducted, we will likely get a better picture of exactly what led to Neanderthal extinction.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/h2>\n<figure style=\"width: 353px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-4.png\" alt=\"Small fossilized finger bone sitting atop a chalk outline of hand bones.\" width=\"353\" height=\"235\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.14: Reproduction of Denisovan finger bone. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6f\/Denisova_Phalanx_distalis.jpg\">Denisova Phalanx distalis<\/a> (image from Museum of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium) by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While Neanderthals represent one regionally adapted branch of the Archaic <em>Homo sapiens <\/em>family tree, recent discoveries in Siberia and the Tibetan Plateau surprised paleoanthropologists by revealing yet another population that was contemporary with Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, Neanderthals, and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The genetic analysis of a child\u2019s finger bone (Figure 12.14) and an adult upper third molar (Figure 12.15) from Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia by a team including Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo discovered that the mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences reflected distinct genetic differences from all known Archaic populations. Dubbed \u201cDenisovans\u201d after the cave in which the bones were found, this population is more closely related to Neanderthals than modern humans, suggesting the two groups shared an ancestor who split from modern humans first, then the Neanderthal-Denisovan line diverged more recently (Reich Et al. 2010).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 227px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-4-1.png\" alt=\"Molar tooth with wear, large surface area, and large roots.\" width=\"227\" height=\"341\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.15: Reproduction of Denisovan molar. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Denisova_Molar.jpg\">Denisova Molar<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Thilo_Parg\">Thilo Parg<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans share up to 5% of their DNA with modern Melanesians, aboriginal Australians, and Polynesians, and 0.2% of their DNA with other modern Asian populations and Native Americans. Additional studies have suggested one (Vernot Et al. 2018) or two (Browning Et al. 2018) separate points of time when interbreeding occurred between modern humans and Denisovans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Genetic analysis reveals that Denisovans (potentially three distinct populations) had adaptations for life at high altitudes that prevented them from developing altitude sickness and hypoxia in extreme environments such as Tibet, where the average annual temperature is close to 0\u2103 and the altitude is more than a kilometer (about 4,000 feet) above sea level. Through protein analysis of a jawbone, one study (Chen Et al. 2019) has placed Denisovans in Tibet as early as 160,000 years ago. Genetic evidence of interbreeding has linked modern Tibetan populations with Denisovans 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, which implies that the unique high-altitude adaptations seen in modern Tibetans may have originated with Denisovans (Huerta-Sanchez Et al. 2014).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Other research suggests tantalizing new directions regarding Denisovans. Stone tools similar to those found in Siberia have been uncovered in the Tibetan plateau suggesting a connection between the Denisovan populations in those two areas (Zhang Et al. 2018). The molar of a young girl, possibly Denisovan, has been found in Laos and shows strong similarities to specimens from China (Demeter Et al. 2022). And DNA sequencing from discoveries in the Denisova Cave have yielded a genome that has been interpreted as the first-generation offspring of a Denisovan father and Neanderthal mother (Slon Et al. 2018). While this research is not yet conclusive and is still being interpreted, exciting new possibilities are being revealed. To stay up-to-date with new discoveries, consider following organizations such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian\u2019s Human Origins Program<\/a> on social media.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">How Do These Fit In? <em>Homo naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo floresiensis<br \/>\n<\/em><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Recently, some fossils have been unearthed that have challenged our understanding of the hominin lineage. The fossils of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are significant for several reasons but are mostly known for how they don\u2019t fit the previously held patterns of hominin evolution. While we examine information about these species, we ask you to consider the evidence presented in this chapter and others to draw your own conclusions regarding the significance and placement of these two unusual fossil species in the hominin lineage.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>naledi<\/strong><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 347px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-5.png\" alt=\"A nearly complete skeleton surrounded by off-white bone fragments on a black table.\" width=\"347\" height=\"390\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.16: A sample of some of the 1,550 bones found representing Homo naledi. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560#fig1\">Dinaledi skeletal specimens (Figure 1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/09560\">Berger et al. 2015<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 2013 recreational spelunkers uncovered a collection of bones deep in a cave network in Johannesburg, South Africa. The cave system, known as Rising Star, had been well documented by other cavers; however, it appears few people had ever gone as far into the cave as these spelunkers did. Lee Berger, paleoanthropologist at University of Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg, immediately put out a call for what he termed \u201cunderground astronauts\u201d to begin recovery and excavation of the fossil materials. Unlike other excavations, Berger and most other paleoanthropologists would not be able to access the elusive site, as it was incredibly difficult to reach, and at some points there was only eight inches of space through which to navigate. The underground astronauts, all petite women anthropologists, were the only ones who were able to access this remarkable site. Armed with small excavation tools and a video camera, which streamed the footage up to the rest of the team at the surface, the team worked together and uncovered a total of 1,550 bones, representing at least 15 individuals, as seen in Figure 12.16. Later, an additional 131 bones, including an almost-complete cranium, were found in a nearby chamber of the cave, representing three more individuals (Figure 12.17). Berger called in a team of specialists to participate in what was dubbed \u201cPaleoanthropology Summer Camp.\u201d Each researcher specialized in a different portion of the hominin skeleton. With various specialists working simultaneously, more rapid analysis was possible of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> than most fossil discoveries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 534px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-4.png\" alt=\"Photograph of four different views of the LES1 Homo naledi skull set against a black background.\" width=\"534\" height=\"599\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.17: Several angles of the nearly complete LES1 Homo naledi skull. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232#fig5\">LES1 Cranium (Figure 5)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/elifesciences.org\/articles\/24232\">Hawks et al. 2017<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While access to the site, approximately 80 m from any known cave entrance or opening, was treacherous for researchers, it must have been difficult for <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> as well. The route included moving through a portion that is just 25 cm wide at some points, known as \u201cSuperman\u2019s Crawl.\u201d The only way to get through this section is by crawling on your stomach with one arm by your side and the other raised above your head. Past Superman\u2019s Crawl, a jagged wall known as the Dragon\u2019s Back would have been very difficult to traverse. Below that, a narrow vertical chute would have eventually led down to the area where the fossils were discovered. While geology changes over time and the cave system likely has undergone its fair share, it is not likely that these features arose after <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> lived (Dirks Et al. 2017). This has made scientists curious as to how the bones ended up in the bottom of the cave system in the first place. It has been suggested that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> deposited the bones there, one way or another. If <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> did deposit the bones, either through random disposal or intentional burial, this raises questions regarding their symbolic behaviour and other cultural traits, including the use of fire, to access a very dark cave system. Another competing idea is that a few individuals may have entered the cave system to escape a predator and then got stuck. To account for the sheer number of fossils, this would have had to happen multiple times.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The features of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> are well-documented due to the fairly large sample, which represents individuals of all sexes and a wide range of ages. The skull shape and features are very much like other members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>\u2014including a sagittal keel and large brow, like <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, and a well-developed frontal lobe, similar to modern humans\u2014yet the brain size is significantly smaller than its counterparts, at approximately 500 cc (560 cc for males and 465 cc for females). The teeth also exhibit features of later members of the genus <em>Homo<\/em>, such as Neanderthals, including a reduction in overall tooth size. <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> also had unique shoulder anatomy and curved fingers, indicating similarities to tree-dwelling primates, which is very different from any other hominin yet found. Perhaps the greatest shock of all is that <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> has been dated to 335,000 to 236,000 years ago, placing it as a contemporary to modern <em>Homo sapiens,<\/em> despite its very primitive features. An additional specimen of a child, found in 2021, not only shares many of the unique features found in the adult specimen but will also add insight into the growth and development of individuals of this species (Brophy Et al. 2021).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Homo <\/strong><strong>floresiensis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In a small cave called Liang Bua, on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, a small collection of fossils were discovered beginning in 2003 (Figure 12.18). The fossil fragments represent as many as nine individuals, including a nearly complete female skeleton. The features of the skull are very similar to that of <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>, including the presence of a sagittal keel, an arching brow ridges and nuchal torus, and the lack of a chin (Figure 12.19). <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>, as the new species is called, had a brain size that was remarkably small at 400 cc, and recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 606px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-3.png\" alt=\"View from inside a large cave with people standing near a dug-out square of dirt.\" width=\"606\" height=\"403\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.18: Liang Bua Cave on the island of Flores, in Indonesia, where a collection of Homo floresiensis specimens were discovered. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Homo_floresiensis_cave.jpg\">Homo floresiensis cave<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/84301190@N00\">Rosino<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 584px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-5.png\" alt=\"Photograph of a gray and off-white cast Homo floresiensis skull.\" width=\"584\" height=\"584\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.19: Homo floresiensis had a brain that was remarkably small at 400 cc. Recent genetic studies suggest a common ancestor with modern humans that predates Homo erectus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-floresiensis-skull-BH-033-2\">Homo floresiensis Skull (Flores Skull LB1)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The complete female skeleton, who was an adult, was approximately a meter tall and would have weighed just under 30 kg, which is significantly shorter and just a few kilograms more than the average, modern, young elementary-aged child. A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> can be seen in Figure 12.20. The small size of the fossil has earned the species the nickname \u201cthe Hobbit.\u201d Many questions have been asked about the stature of this species, as all of the specimens found also show evidence of diminutive stature and small brain size. Some explanations include pathology; however, this seems unlikely as all fossils found thus far demonstrate the same pattern. Another possible explanation lies in a biological phenomena seen in other animal species also found on the island, which date to a similar time period. This phenomenon, called <strong>insular dwarfing<\/strong>, is due to limited food resources on an island, which can create a selective pressure for large-bodied species to be selected for smaller size, as an island would not have been able to support their larger-bodied cousins for a long period of time. This phenomenon is the cause of other unique species known to have lived on the island at the same time, including the miniature stegodon, a dwarf elephant species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 448px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-4.png\" alt=\"Black-and-white drawing of a large nude woman and a much smaller man.\" width=\"448\" height=\"611\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 12.20: A reconstructed comparison between an anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis. As an adult, Homo floresiensis was approximately 1 meter tall and would have weighed under 30 kg. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-16\/\">Anatomically modern human and Homo floresiensis (Figure 11.19)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is ongoing research and debate regarding <em>Homo floresiensis<\/em>\u2019 dates of existence, with some researchers concluding that they lived on Flores until perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago, although they are more often dated to 100,000 to 60,000 years ago. Stone tools from that time period uncovered at the site are similar to other hominin stone tools found on the island of Flores. <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have hunted a wide range of animals, including the miniature stegodon, giant rats, and other large rodents. Other animals on the island that could have threatened them include the giant komodo dragon. An interesting note about this island chain is that ancestors of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> would have had to traverse the open ocean in order to get there, as the nearest island is almost 10 km away, and there is little evidence to support that a land bridge connecting mainland Asia or Australia to the island would have been present. This separation from the mainland would also have limited the number of other animals, including predators and human species, that would have had access to the island. Anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> arrived on the island around 30,000 years ago and, if some researchers\u2019 later dates for <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are correct, both species may have lived on Flores at the same time. The modern population living on the island of Flores today believes that their ancestors came from the Liang Bua cave; however, recent genetic studies have determined they are not related to <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> (Tucci Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summaries<\/span><\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">600,000\u2013200,000 years ago (although some regional variation)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Africa, Europe, and Asia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Broken Hill (Zambia), Atapuerca (Spain)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1,200 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slightly smaller teeth in back of mouth, larger front teeth<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Emerging forehead, no chin, projecting occipital region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Varied regionally, but some continue to use Acheulean handaxe, others adopt Mousterian tool culture<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table3-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table3-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lots of regional variation in this species<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">335,000\u2013236,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">South Africa<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rising Star Cave<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reduced tooth size<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, large brow, well-developed frontal region<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Suspensory shoulder<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Neanderthals<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">150,000\u201340,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Western Europe, Middle East, and Western Asia only<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Shanidar (Iraq), La Chapelle-aux-Saints (France)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">1500 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Retromolar gap<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large brow ridge, midfacial prognathism, large infraorbital foramina, occipital bun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Robust skeleton with short and stocky body, increased musculature, barrel chest<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mousterian tools often constructed using the Levallois technique<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Species<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201360,000 years ago, perhaps as recently as 17,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Liang Bua, island of Flores, Indonesia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u201cThe Hobbit\u201d<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">400 cc average<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Sagittal keel, arching brow ridges, nuchal torus, no chin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Very short stature (approximately 3.5 ft.)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tools similar to other tools found on the island of Flores<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">N\/A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 468pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Denisovans<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">100,000\u201330,000 years ago<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Siberia<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Child\u2019s finger bone and adult molar<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Large molars (from limited evidence)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">unknown<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Other <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Closely related to Neanderthals (genetically)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Research presented in the chapter contributes to why scientists have taken to nicknaming this time period \u201cthe muddle in the middle.\u201d We know that the Middle Pleistocene picks up from <em>Homo erectus <\/em>and ends with the appearance of anatomically modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. While the start and the end are clear, it\u2019s the middle that is messy. As more research is conducted and more data is collected, rather than clarifying our understanding of the hominin lineage during this time period, it only inspires more questions, particularly about the relationships between hominins during this time period, including the oft-misunderstood Neanderthal. Research is painting a more detailed picture of Neanderthal intelligence and both biological and behavioural adaptations. At the same time, their relationship to other Middle Pleistocene hominins, including Denisovans, as well as modern humans, remains unclear.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Homo<\/em> <em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> are clear outliers when compared to their contemporary hominin species. Each has surprised paleoanthropologists for both their archaic traits in relatively modern times and their unique combination of traits seen in archaic species and modern humans. While these finds have been exciting, they have also completely upended the assumed trajectory of the human lineage, causing scientists to re-examine assumptions about hominin evolution and what it means to be modern. Add this to the developments being made using ancient DNA, other new fossil discoveries, and other innovations in paleoanthropology, and you see that our understanding of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and others living during this time period is rapidly developing and changing. This is a true testament to the nature of science and the scientific method.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Clearly, hominins of the Middle Pleistocene are distinct from our species today. Yet, understanding the hominins that directly preceded our species and clarifying the evolutionary relationships between us is important to better understanding our own place in nature.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What physical and cultural features are unique to Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>? How are Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em> different in both physical and cultural characteristics from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\n<li>Describe the specific changes to the brain and skull first seen in Archaic<em> Homo sapiens<\/em>. Why does the shape of the skull change so dramatically from <em>Homo <\/em><em>erectus<\/em>?<\/li>\n<li>What role did the shifting environment play in the adaptation of Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals? Discuss at least one physical feature and one cultural feature that would have assisted these groups in surviving the changing environment.<\/li>\n<li>What does the regional variation in Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> represent in terms of the broader story of our species\u2019 evolution?<\/li>\n<li>Describe the issues raised by the discoveries of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em> in the understanding of the story of the evolution of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p><strong>Allele<\/strong>: Each of two or more alternative forms of a gene that arise by mutation and are found at the same place on a chromosome.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Anthropocentrism<\/strong>: A way of thinking that assumes humans are the most important species and leads to interpreting the world always through a human lens. Species-centric science and thought.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cortex<\/strong>: The outside, or rough outer covering, of a rock. Usually the cortex is removed during the process of stone tool creation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ethnocentric<\/strong>: Applying negative judgments to other cultures based on comparison to one\u2019s own.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Exogenous DNA<\/strong>: DNA that originates from sources outside of the specimen you are trying to sequence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Flexed position<\/strong>: Fetal position, in which the legs are drawn up to the middle of the body and the arms are drawn toward the body center. Intentional burials are often found in the flexed body position.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraminifera<\/strong>: Microscopic single-celled organisms with a shell that are common in all marine environments. The fossil record of foraminifera extends back well over 500 million years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Glaciation<\/strong>: A glacial period, or time when a large portion of the world is covered by glaciers and ice sheets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globular<\/strong>: Round-shaped, like a globe.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Grave goods<\/strong>: Items included with a body at burial. Items may signify occupation or hobbies, social status, or level of importance in the community, or they may be items believed necessary for the afterlife.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Haft<\/strong>: A handle. Also used as a verb\u2014to attach a handle to an item, such as a stone tool.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Infraorbital foramina<\/strong>: Small holes on the maxilla bone of the face that allows nerves and blood to reach the skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Insular dwarfing<\/strong>: A form of dwarfism that occurs when a limited geographic region, such as an island, causes a large-bodied animal to be selected for a smaller body size.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Interglacial<\/strong>: A warmer period between two glacial time periods.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Levallois technique<\/strong>: A distinctive technique of stone tool manufacturing used by Archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, including Neanderthals. The technique involves the preparation of a core and striking edges off in a regular fashion around the core. Then a series of similarly sized pieces can be removed, which can then be turned into different tools.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Midfacial prognathism<\/strong>: A forward projection of the nose or the middle facial region. Usually associated with Neanderthals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mousterian tools<\/strong>: The stone tool industry of Neanderthals and their contemporaries in Africa and Western Asia. Mousterian tools are known for a diverse set of flake tools, which is different from the large bifacial tools of the Acheulean industry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Nasal aperture<\/strong>: The opening for the nose visible on a skull. Often pear- or heart-shaped.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Occipital bun<\/strong>: A prominent bulge or projection on the back of the skull, specifically the occipital bone. This is a feature present only on Neanderthal skulls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ochre<\/strong>: A natural clay pigment mixed with ferric oxide and clay and sand. Ranges in color from brown to red to orange.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retracted face<\/strong>: A face that is flatter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Retromolar gap<\/strong>: A space behind the last molar and the end of the jaw. This is a feature present only on Neanderthals. It also occurs through cultural modification in modern humans who have had their third molars, or wisdom teeth, removed.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnh.org\/exhibitions\/permanent-exhibitions\/anne-and-bernard-spitzer-hall-of-human-origins\">Anne and Bernard Spitzer Hall of Human Origins<\/a>\u2014American Museum of Natural History.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDawn of Humanity,\u201d PBS documentary, 2015<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ted.com\/talks\/svante_paeaebo_dna_clues_to_our_inner_neanderthal?language=en\">\u201cDNA Clues to Our Inner Neanderthal,\u201d<\/a> TED Talk by Svante P\u00e4\u00e4bo, 2011.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Dirt\u201d Podcast, Episode 30, <a href=\"https:\/\/thedirtpod.com\/episodes\/\/episode-30-the-human-family-tree-shrub-crabgrass-tumbleweed-part-3\">\u201cThe Human Family Tree (Shrub? Crabgrass? Tumbleweed?), Part 3: Very Humany Indeed\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/page\/games-and-activities\">eFossil Games and Activities<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Frank, Rebecca. 2021. \u201cThe Genus Homo.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual, <\/em><\/a>edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/research\/asian-research-projects\/hobbits-flores-indonesia.\">Hobbits on Flores, Indonesia<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/evolution.berkeley.edu\/evo-news\/lumping-or-splitting-in-the-fossil-record\/\">Lumping or Splitting in the Fossil Record<\/a> - UC Berkeley Understanding Evolution.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/genetics\/neandertals-and-more\/overview\/\">Neandertals and More<\/a>\u00a0- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sapiens.org\/biology\/neanderthal-anatomy\/?fbclid=IwAR2Bcff1GVkTLnbCR58JAWiJzkk-Ell7zL0FUddf1HNAX6RDAZxbqh1zWoI\">Neanderthals: Body of Evidence<\/a> - SAPIENS.<\/p>\n<p>Perash, Rose L., and Kristen A. Broehl. 2021. \u201cHominin Review: Evolutionary Trends.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p>Perkl, Bradley. \u201cBrain, Language, Lithics.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/index.php\/lab-and-activities-manual\/.\"><em>Explorations: Lab and Activity Manual<\/em><\/a>, edited by<em>.<\/em> Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff. CC BY-NC. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/shanidar-3-neanderthal-skeleton\">Shanidar 3 - Neanderthal Skeleton<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/species\">Species<\/a> - Smithsonian Human Origins.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smithsonian.humanorigins\/\">Smithsonian Human Origins Program Facebook page<\/a> (@smithsonian.humanorigins).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.smithsonianmag.com\/science-nature\/bringing-human-evolution-life-180951155\/\">Paleoartist Brings Human Evolution to Life<\/a> - Elisabeth Dayn\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Adler, Daniel S., Timothy J. Prindiville, and Nicholas J. Conard. 2003. \u201cPatterns of Spatial Organization and Land Use During the Eemian Interglacial in the Rhineland: New Data from Wallertheim, Germany.\u201d Eurasian Prehistory 1(2): 25\u201378.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alex, Bridget. 2018. \u201cNeanderthal Brains: Bigger, Not Necessarily Better.\u201d Discover, September 21, 2018. <a class=\"rId115\" href=\"https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better\">https:\/\/www.discovermagazine.com\/planet-earth\/neanderthal-brains-bigger-not-necessarily-better<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ashton, Nick M. 2002. \u201cAbsence of Humans in Britain during the Last Interglacial Period (Oxygen Isotope Stage 5e).\u201d <em>Publications du CERP<\/em> 8: 93\u2013103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Lee R., John Hawks, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Lucas K. Delezene, Tracy L. Kivell, et al. 2015. \u201c<em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em>, a New Species of the Genus <em>Homo<\/em> from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 4:e09560. <a class=\"rId116\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId117\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">10.7554\/eLife.09560<\/a><a class=\"rId118\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.09560\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Berger, Thomas D., and Erik Trinkaus. 1995. \u201cPatterns of Trauma among the Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>22 (6): 841\u2013852.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blangero, J., E.E. Quillen, M.A. Almeida, D.R. McKay, J.M. Peralta, S. Williams-Blangero, J.E. Curran, R. Duggirala, D.C. Glahn. 2014. \u201cGenomic Reconstruction of Neandertal Brain Structure and Function.\u201d Paper presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 12 April 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocherens, Herv\u00e9, Daniel Billiou, Andr\u00e9 Mariotti, Maryl\u00e8ne Patou-Mathis, Marcel Otte, Dominique Bonjean, and Michel Toussaint. 1999. \u201cPalaeoenvionmental and Palaeodietary Implications of Isotopic Biogeochemistry of Last Interglacial Neanderthal and Mammal Bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium).\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 26 (6): 599\u2013607.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre and Anna Degioanni. 2013. \u201cNeanderthal Demographic Estimates.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 54 (S8): S202\u2013S213.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Boettger, Tatjana, Elena Yu. Novenko, Andrej A. Velichko, Olga K. Borisova, Konstantin V. Kremenetski, Stefan Knetsch, and Frank W. Junge. 2009. \u201cInstability of Climate and Vegetation Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe during the Final Stage of the Last Interglacial (Eemian, Mikulino) and Early Glaciation.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 207 (1-2): 137\u2013144. <a class=\"rId119\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId120\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2009.05.006.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Brophy, Juliet K., Marina C. Elliott, Darryl J. De Ruiter, Debra R. Bolter, Steven E. Churchill, Christopher S. Walker, John Hawks, and Lee R. Berger. 2021. \u201cImmature Hominin Craniodental Remains from a New Locality in the Rising Star Cave System, South Africa.\u201d <em>PaleoAnthropology <\/em>1: 1\u201314. <a class=\"rId121\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId122\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.\">10.48738\/2021.iss1.64.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Browning, Sharon R., Brian L. Browning, Ying Zhou, Serena Tucci, and Josh M. Akey. 2018. \u201cAnalysis of Human Sequence Data Reveals Two Pulses of Archaic Denisovan Admixture.\u201d <em>Cell<\/em> 173 (1): 53\u201361.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Chen, Fahu, Frido Welker, Chuan-Chou Shen, Shara E. Bailey, Inga Bergmann, Simon Davis, Huan Xia, et al. 2019. \u201cA Late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Mandible from the Tibetan Plateau.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 569: 409\u2013412. <a class=\"rId123\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1139-x.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 1998. \u201cCold Adaptations, Heterochrony, and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 7 (2): 46\u201360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E. 2006. \u201cBioenergetic Perspective on Neanderthal Thermoregulatory and Activity Budgets.\u201d In <em>Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches and Perspectives<\/em>, edited by K. Havarti and T. Harrison, pp. 113\u2013134. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Churchill, Steven E., Robert G. Franciscus, Hilary A. McKean-Peraza, Julie A. Daniel, and Brittany R. Warren. 2009. \u201cShanidar 3 Neanderthal Rib Puncture Wound and Paleolithic Weaponry.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 57 (2): 163\u2013178.<\/p>\n<p>Collinge, J., Whitfield, J., McKintosh, E., Beck, J., Mead, S., Thomas, D. J., &amp; Alpers, M. P. (2006). Kuru in the 21st century--an acquired human prion disease with very long incubation periods. <em>Lancet (London, England)<\/em>, 367(9528), 2068\u20132074. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)68930-7<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Cook, Rebecca W., Antonio Vazzana, Rita Sorrentino, Stefano Benazzi, Amanda L. Smith, David S. Strait, and Justin A. Ledogar. 2021. \u201cThe Cranial Biomechanics and Feeding Performance of <em>Homo <\/em><em>floresiensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Interface Focus<\/em> 11 (5). <a class=\"rId124\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId125\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.\">10.1098\/rsfs.2020.0083.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dawson, James E., and Erik Trinkaus. 1997. \u201cVertebral Osteoarthritis of La Chapelle-Aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science <\/em>24 (11): 1015-1021. <a class=\"rId126\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jasc.1996.0179.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Defleur, Alban R., and Emmanuel Desclaux. 2019. \u201cImpact of the Last Interglacial Climate Change on Ecosystems and Neanderthals Behavior at Baume Moula-Guercy, Ard\u00e8che, France.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 104: 114\u2013124. <a class=\"rId127\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jas.2019.01.002.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degano, Ilaria, Sylvain Soriano, Paola Villa, Luca Pollarolo, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Zenobia Jacobs, Katerina Douka, Silvana Vitagliano, and Carlo Tozzi. 2019. \u201cHafting of Middle Paleolithic Tools in Latium (Central Italy): New Data from Fossellone and Sant\u2019Agostino Caves.\u201d <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14(10): 1\u201329. <a class=\"rId128\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId129\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0213473.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Degioanni Anna, Chritophe Bonenfant, Sandrine Cabut, and Silvana Condemi. 2019. Living on the Edge: Was Demographic Weakness the Cause of Neanderthal Demise? <em>PLoS ONE<\/em> 14 (5): e0216742.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId130\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId131\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.\">10.1371\/journal.pone.0216742.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Delpiano, Davide, Kristin Heasley, and Marci Peresani. 2018. \u201cAssessing Neanderthal Land Use and Lithic Raw Material Management in Discoid Technology.\u201d <em>Journal of Anthropological Sciences<\/em> 96: 89\u2013110. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4436\/jass.96006.\">10.4436\/jass.96006.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Demeter, Fabrice, Cl\u00e9ment Zanolli, Kira E. Westaway, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Phillippe Duringer, Mike W. Morley, Frido Welker, et al. 2022. \u201cA Middle Pleistocene Denisovan Molar from the Annamite Chain of Northern Laos.\u201d <em>Nature Communications<\/em> 13 (1): 2557. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dirks, Paul H. G. M., Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, Jan D. Kramers, John Hawks, Anthony Dosseto, Mathieu Duval, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Age of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> and Associated Sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>eLife<\/em> 6: e24231. <a class=\"rId135\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId136\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24231.\">10.7554\/eLife.24231. <\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">el-Showk, Sedeer. 2019. \u201cNeanderthal Clues to Brain Evolution in Humans.\u201d Nature 571: S10\u2013S11. <a class=\"rId137\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId138\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">10.1038\/<\/a><a class=\"rId139\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">d41586-019-02210-6<\/a><a class=\"rId140\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02210-6.\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Esteban, Irene, Curtis W. Marean, Erich C. Fisher, Panagiotis Karkanas, Dan Carbanes, and Rosa M. Albert. 2018. \u201cPhytoliths as an Indicator of Early Modern Humans\u2019 Plant-Gathering Strategies, Fire, Fuel, and Site-Occupation Intensity During the Middle Stone Age at Pinnacle Point 5-6 (South Coast, South Africa).\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (6): 1\u201333.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evteev, Andrej A., Alla A. Movsesian, and Alexandra N. Grosheva. 2017. \u201cThe Association between Mid-facial Morphology and Climate in Northeast Europe Differs from That in North Asia: Implications for Understanding the Morphology of Late Pleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 107: 36\u201348. <a class=\"rId141\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId142\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.\">10.1016\/j.jhevol.2017.02.008.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Frayer, David W., Marina Lozano, Jose M. Bermudez de Castro, Eudald Carbonell, Juan-Luis Arsuaga, Jakov Radovcic, Ivana Fiore, and Luca Bondioli. 2012. \u201cMore Than 500,000 Years of Right-handedness in Europeans.\u201d <em>Laterality<\/em> 17 (1): 51\u201369. <a class=\"rId143\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1357650X.2010.529451.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fu, Qiaomei, Mateja Hajdinjak, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Silviu Constantin, Swapan Mallick, Pontus Skoglund, Nick Patterson, et al. 2015. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from Romania with a Recent Neanderthal Ancestor.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 524 (7564): 216. <a class=\"rId144\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature14558.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine, Elizabeth S. Noack, Eduard Pop, Constantin Herbst, Johannes Pfleging, Jonas Buchli, Arne Jacob, et al. 2018. \u201cEvidence for Close-Range Hunting by Last Interglacial Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Nature Ecology and Evolution<\/em> 2: 1087\u20131092. <a class=\"rId145\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId146\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1\">10.1038\/s41559-018-0596-1<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Gilpin, William., Marcus W. Feldman, and Kenichi Aoki. 2016. \u201cAn Ecocultural Model Predicts Neanderthal Extinction through Competition with Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 113 (8): 2134\u20132139. <a class=\"rId147\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1524861113.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Golovanova, Liubov. Vitaliena, Vladimir B. Doronichev, Naomi E. Cleghorn, Marianna A. Koulkova, Tatiana V. Sapelko, and M. Steven Shackley. 2010. \u201cSignificance of Ecological Factors in the Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 51 (5): 655\u2013691. <a class=\"rId148\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1086\/656185.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Harrold, Francis B. 1980. \u201cA Comparative Analysis of Eurasian Paleolithic Burials.\u201d <em>World Archaeology <\/em>12 (2): 195\u2013211.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Hawks, John, Marina Elliott, Peter Schmid, Steven E. Churchill, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Eric M. Roberts, Hannah Hilbert-Wolf, et al. 2017. \"New Fossil Remains of <em>Homo <\/em><em>naledi<\/em> from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.\u201d eLife 6: e24232. <a class=\"rId149\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId150\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.24232.\">10.7554\/eLife.24232.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Henry, Amanda G., Alison S. Brooks, and Dolores R. Piperno. 2010. \u201cMicrofossils and Calculus Demonstrate Consumption of Plants and Cooked Foods in Neanderthal Diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium).\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA<\/em> 108 (2): 486\u2013491. <a class=\"rId151\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1016868108.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Houldcroft, Charlotte J., and Simon J. Underdown. 2016. \u201cNeanderthal Genomics Suggests a Pleistocene Time Frame for the First Epidemiologic Transition.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 160 (3): 379\u2013388.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Huerta-S\u00e1nchez, Emilia, Xin Jin, Asan, Zhuoma Bianba, Benjamin M. Peter, Nicolas Vinckenbosch, Yu Liang, et al. 2014. \u201cAltitude Adaptation in Tibetans Caused by Introgression of Denisovan-like DNA.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 512 (7513): 194-197.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Jaouen, Klervia, Michael P. Richards, and Adeline Le Cabec. 2019. \u201cExceptionally High \u03b4<sup>15<\/sup>N Values in Collagen Single Amino Acids Confirm Neanderthals as High-Trophic Level Carnivores.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 116 (11): 4928\u20134933. <a class=\"rId152\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1814087116.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kandel, Andrew W., Michael Bolus, Knut Bretzke, Angela A. Bruch, Miriam N. Haidle, Christine Hertler, and Michael M\u00e4rker. 2015. \u201cIncreasing Behavioral Flexibility? An Integrative Macro-Scale Approach to Understanding the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa.\u201d<em> Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 23: 623\u2013668. <a class=\"rId153\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId154\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.\">10.1007\/s10816-015-9254-y.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kortlandt, Adriaan. 2002. \u201cNeanderthal Anatomy and the Use of Spears.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 11 (5): 183\u2013184.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Kruger, A., P. Randolph-Quinney, and M. Elliott. 2016. \u201cMultimodal Spatial Mapping and Visualization of Dinaledi Chamber and Rising Star Cave.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 112 (5\u20136). <a class=\"rId155\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.\">10.17159\/sajs.2016\/20160032.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Lieberman, Philip, and Edmund S. Crelin. 1971. \u201cOn the Speech of Neanderthal Man.\u201d <em>Linguistic Inquiry<\/em> 2 (2): 203\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mendez, Fernando L., G. David Poznik, Sergi Castellano, and Carlos D. Bustamante. 2016. \u201cThe Divergence of Neanderthal and Modern Human Y Chromosomes.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 98 (4): 728\u2013734.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Mora-Berm\u00fadez, Felipe, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak, Jula Peters, Ronald Naumann, Lei Xing, Mihail Sarov, et al. 2022. \u201cLonger Metaphase and Fewer Chromosome Segregation Errors in Modern Human Than Neanderthal Brain Development.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 8 (30). <a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.abn7702.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nicholson, Christopher M. 2017. \u201cEemian Paleoclimate Zones and Neanderthal Landscape Use: A GIS Model of Settlement Patterning during the Last Interglacial.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 438 (B): 144\u2013157. <a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2017.04.023.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nobel Prize, The. 2022. \u201cPress Release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2022.\u201d Nobelf\u00f6rsamlingen The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. Press release, November 3, 2022. <a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.\">https:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/2022\/press-release\/.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Nowell, April. 2016. \u201cChildhood, Play and the Evolution of Cultural Capacity in Neanderthals and Modern Humans.\u201d In<em> The Nature of Culture: Based on an Interdisciplinary Symposium \u201cThe Nature of Culture,\u201d T\u00fcbingen, Germany<\/em>, edited by M. N. Haidle, N. J. Conard, and M. Bolus, 87\u201397. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. <a class=\"rId160\" href=\"blank\">https:\/\/doi.org.10.1007\/978-94-017-7426-0_9<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Parkington, John. 2003. \u201cMiddens and Moderns: Shellfishing and the Middle Stone Age of the Western Cape, South Africa.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 99 (5\u20136): 243\u2013274.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pearce, Eiluned, Chris Stringer, and R. I. M. Dunbar. 2013. \u201cNew Insights into Differences in Brain Organizations between Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences<\/em> 280 (1758): 20130168. <a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168<\/a><a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspb.2013.0168\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Pomeroy, Emma, Paul Bennett, Chris O. Hunt, Tim Reynolds, Lucy Farr, Marine Frouin, James Holman, Ross Lane, Charles French, and Graeme Barker. 2020. \u201cNew Neanderthal Remains Associated with the \u2018Flower Burial\u2019 at Shanidar Cave.\u201d <em>Antiquity<\/em> 94 (373): 11\u201326. <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.\">10.15184\/aqy.2019.207.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Radford, A., &amp; Scragg, R. (2013). Discovery of Kuru Revisited: How Anthropology Hindered Then Enhanced Kuru Research. <em>Health and History, 15<\/em>(2), 29\u201352. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5401\/healthhist.15.2.0029<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rae, Todd, Thomas Koppe, and Chris B. Stringer. 2011. \u201cThe Neanderthal Face Is Not Cold-Adapted.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 60 (2): 234\u2013239. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhevol.2010.10.003.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. 2010. \u201cGenetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 468: 1053\u20131060. <a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature09710.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richards, Michael P., Paul B. Pettit, Erik Trinkaus, Fred H. Smith, Maja Paunovi\u0107, and Ivor Karavani\u0107. 2000. \u201cNeanderthal Diet at Vindija and Neanderthal Predation: The Evidence from Stable Isotopes.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 97 (13): 7663\u20137666.<br style=\"clear: both\" \/><a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.120178997.\">10.1073\/pnas.120178997.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Richter, J\u00fcrgen, 2006. \u201cNeanderthals in Their Landscape: Neanderthals in Europe.\u201d In <em>Proceedings of the International Conference held in the Gallo-Roman Museum in Tongeren<\/em>, ERAUL 117, edited by B. Demarsin and M. Otte, 17\u201332. K\u00f6ln: Universit\u00e4t zu K\u00f6ln.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Roksandic, Mirjana, Predrag Radovic, Xiu-Jie Wu, and Christopher J. Bae. 2021. \u201cResolving the \u2018Muddle in the Middle\u2019: The Case for <em>Homo bodoensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em>, 31 (1). <a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21929.\">10.1002\/evan.21929.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Rougier, H., Crevecoeur, I., Beauval, C., Posth, C., Flas, D., Wi\u00dfing, C., Furtw\u00e4ngler, A., Germonpr\u00e9, M., G\u00f3mez-Olivencia, A., Semal, P., van der Plicht, J., Bocherens, H., &amp; Krause, J. (2016). Neandertal cannibalism and Neandertal bones used as tools in Northern Europe. <em>Scientific Reports, 6<\/em>(1). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep29005<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slon, Viviane, Fabrizio Mafessoni, Benjamin Vernot, Cesare de Filippo, Steffi Grote, Bence Viola, Mateja Hajdinjak, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Genome of the Offspring of a Neanderthal Mother and a Denisovan Father.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 561 (7721): 113\u2013116.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Smith, Tanya M., Paul Tafforeau, Donald J. Reid, Joanne Pouech, Vincent Lazzari, John P. Zermeno, Debbi Guatelli-Steinberg, et al. 2010. \u201cDental Evidence for Ontogenetic Differences Between Modern Humans and Neanderthals.\u201d <em>Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (49): 20923\u201320928.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Staubwasser, Michael, Virgil Dr\u0103gu\u0282in, Bogdan P. Onac, Sergey Assonov, Vasile Ersek, Dirk L. Hoffman, and Daniel Veres. 2018. \u201cImpact of Climate Change on the Transition of Neanderthals to Modern Humans in Europe.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 115 (37): 9116\u20139121. <a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1808647115.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stewart, T. D. 1977. \u201cThe Neanderthal Skeletal Remains from Shanidar Cave, Iraq: A Summary of Findings to Date.\u201d<em> Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society <\/em>121 (2): 121\u2013165.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stolarczyk, Regine E., and Patrick Schmidt. 2018. \u201cIs Early Silcrete Heat Treatment a New Behavioural Proxy in the Middle Stone Age?\u201d <em>PLoS One<\/em> 13 (10): 1\u201321.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trinkaus, E. 1985. \u201cPathology and Posture of the La-Chapelle-aux-Saints Neanderthal.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology <\/em>67 (1): 19\u201341.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Trujillo Cleber A., Edward S. Rice, Nathan K. Schaefer, Isaac A. Chaim, Emily C. Wheeler, Assael A. Madrigal, Justin Buchanan, et al. 2021. \u201cReintroduction of the Archaic Variant of NOVA1 in Cortical Organoids Alters Neurodevelopment.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 371 (6530): eaax2537. <a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2537.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tucci, Serena, Samuel H. Vohr, Rajiv C. McCoy, Benjamin Vernot, Matthew R. Robinson, Chiara Barbieri, Brad J. Nelson, et al. 2018. \u201cEvolutionary History and Adaptation of a Human Pygmy Population of Flores Island, Indonesia.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 361 (6401): 511\u2013516.<\/p>\n<p>Ullrich H, 2005: Cannibalistic Rites within Mortuary Practices from the Paleolithic to Middle Ages in Europe. <em>Anthropologie (Brno)<\/em> 43, 2-3: 249-261.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Van Andel, T. H., and P. C. Tzedakis. 1996. \u201cPaleolithic Landscapes of Europe and Environs, 150,000\u201325,000 Years Ago: An Overview.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 15 (5\u20136): 481\u2013500.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Venner, Stephen J. 2018. \u201cA New Estimate for Neanderthal Energy Expenditure.\u201d CUNY Academic Works.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Vernot, Benjamin, Serena Tucci, Janet Kelso, Joshua G. Schraiber, Aaron B. Wolf, Rachel M. Gittelman, Michael Danneman, et al. 2016. \u201cExcavating Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA from the Genomes of Melanesian Individuals.\u201d <em>Science <\/em>352 (6282): 235\u2013239.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Weaver, T. D., and J. Hublin. 2009. \u201cNeanderthal Birth Canal Shape and the Evolution of Human Childbirth.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 106 (20): 8151\u20138156.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wi\u1e9eing, Christoph, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Rougier, Isabelle Crevecoer, Mietje Germonpr\u00e9, Yuichi Naito, Patrick Semal, and Herv\u00e9 Bocherens. 2015. \u201cIsotopic Evidence for Dietary Ecology of Late Neanderthals in Northwestern Europe.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 411 (A): 327\u2013345. <a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.\">10.1016\/j.quaint.2015.09.091.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wong, Kate. 2015. \u201cNeanderthal Minds.\u201d <em>Scientific American<\/em> (January): 312(2): 36-43. <a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0215-36.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zhang, X. L., B. B. Ha, S. J. Wang, Z. J. Chen, J. Y. Ge, H. Long, W. He, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Earliest Human Occupation of the High-Altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 Thousand to 30 Thousand Years Ago.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 362 (6418): 1049\u20131051. <a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.add5582.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zilh\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Diego E. Angelucci, Ernestina Badal-Garc\u00eda, Francesco d'Errico, Flor\u00e9al Daniel, Laure Dayet, Katerina Douka, et al. 2010. \u201cSymbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 107 (3): 1023\u20131028. <a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/<\/a><a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.\">10.1073\/pnas.0914088107.<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Zollikofer, Christopher Peter Edwards, and Marcia Silvia Ponce de Le\u00f3n. 2013. \u201cPandora\u2019s Growing Box: Inferring the Evolution and Development of Hominin Brains from Endocasts.\u201d Evolutionary Anthropology 22 (1): 20\u201333. <a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/evan.21333.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Acknowledgments<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The authors would like to extend their thanks to Cassandra Gilmore and Anna Goldfield for thoughtful and insightful suggestions on the first edition of this chapter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_952\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_952\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p>Keith Chan, Ph.D., Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District and MiraCosta College<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Lily Berruyer, Lyn Loytchenko, and Sarah Cupidio<\/h6>\n<p><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\"><em>Chapter 12: Modern Homo sapiens<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Keith Chan. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li>Identify the skeletal and behavioural traits that represent modern <em>Homo sapiens.<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Critically evaluate different types of evidence for the origin of our species in Africa and our expansion around the world.<\/li>\n<li>Understand how the human lifestyle changed when people transitioned from foraging to agriculture.<\/li>\n<li>Hypothesize how human evolutionary trends may continue into the future.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The walls of a pink limestone cave in the hillside of Jebel Irhoud jutted out of the otherwise barren landscape of the Moroccan desert (Figure 13.1). Miners had excavated the cave in the 1960s, revealing some fossils. In 2007, a re-excavation of the site became a momentous occasion for science. A fossil cranium unearthed by a team of researchers was barely visible to the untrained eye. Just the fossil\u2019s robust brows were peering out of the rock. This research team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology was the latest to explore the ancient human presence in this part of North Africa after a find by miners in 1960. Excavating near the first discovery, the researchers wanted to learn more about how <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> lived far from East Africa, where we thought our species originated.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 2500px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/image10-1.jpg\" alt=\"Rocky hillside with exposed layers. People are visible at the base.\" width=\"2500\" height=\"987\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.1: The excavation of an exposed cave at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, where hominin fossils were found in the 1960s and in 2007. Dating showed that they could represent the earliest-known modern Homo sapiens. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/homo-sapiens\/presskit.html\">View looking south of the Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) site<\/a> by Shannon McPherron, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/index.html\">MPI EVA Leipzig<\/a>, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The scientists were surprised when they analyzed the cranium, named Irhoud 10, and other fossils. Statistical comparisons with other human crania concluded that the Irhoud face shapes were typical of recent modern humans while the braincases matched ancient modern humans. Based on the findings of other scientists, the team expected these modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> fossils to be around 200,000 years old. Instead, dating revealed that the cranium had been buried for around 315,000 years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Together, the modern-looking facial dimensions and the older date reshaped the interpretation of our species: modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Some key evolutionary changes from the archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (described in Chapter 12) to our species today happened 100,000 years earlier than we had thought and across the vast African continent rather than concentrated in its eastern region.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">This revelation in the study of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is just one of the latest in this continually advancing area of biological anthropology. Researchers today are still discovering amazing fossils and ingenious ways to collect data and test hypotheses about our past. Through the collective work of many scientists, we are building an overall theory of modern human origins.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Defining Modernity<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What defines modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> when compared to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>? Modern humans, like you and me, have a set of derived traits that are not seen in archaic humans or any other hominin. As with other transitions in hominin evolution, such as increasing brain size and bipedal ability, modern traits do not appear fully formed or all at once. In other words, the first modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> was not just born one day from archaic parents. The traits common to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> appeared in a <strong>mosaic<\/strong> manner: gradually and out of sync with one another. There are two areas to consider when tracking the complex evolution of modern human traits. One is the physical change in the skeleton. The other is behaviour inferred from the size and shape of the cranium and material culture evidence.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Skeletal Traits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The skeleton of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is less robust than that of archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. In other words, the modern skeleton is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1406\">gracile<\/a><\/strong>, meaning that the structures are thinner and smoother. Differences related to gracility in the cranium are seen in the braincase, the face, and the mandible. There are also broad differences in the rest of the skeleton.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Cranial Traits<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 445px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29-2.png\" alt=\"A rounded skull facing a robust skull with sloping forehead.\" width=\"445\" height=\"221\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.2: Comparison between modern (left) and archaic (right) Homo sapiens skulls. Note the overall gracility of the modern skull, as well as the globular braincase. Credit: <a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Modern human and Neanderthal<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/explorations.americananthro.org\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a class=\"rId17\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Several elements of the braincase differ between modern and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Overall, the shape is much rounder, or more <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1758\"><strong>globular<\/strong>,<\/a> on a modern skull (Lieberman, McBratney, and Krovitz 2002; Neubauer, Hublin, and Gunz 2018; Pearson 2008; Figure 13.2). You can feel the globularity of your own modern human skull. Feel the height of your forehead with the palm of your hand. Viewed from the side, the tall vertical forehead of a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> stands out when compared to the sloping archaic version. This is because the frontal lobe of the modern human brain is larger than the one in archaic humans, and the skull has to accommodate the expansion. The vertical forehead reduces a trait that is common to all other hominins: the brow ridge or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1759\">supraorbital torus<\/a><\/strong>. The parietal lobes of the brain and the matching parietal bones on either side of the skull both bulge outward more in modern humans. At the back of the skull, the archaic occipital bun is no longer present. Instead, the occipital region of the modern human cranium has a derived tall and smooth curve, again reflecting the globular brain inside.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The trend of shrinking face size across hominins reaches its extreme with our species as well. The facial bones of a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are extremely gracile compared to all other hominins (Lieberman, McBratney, and Krovitz 2002). Continuing a trend in hominin evolution, technological innovations kept reducing the importance of teeth in reproductive success (Lucas 2007). As natural selection favoured smaller and smaller teeth, the surrounding bone holding these teeth also shrank.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Related to smaller teeth, the mandible is also gracile in modern humans when compared to archaic humans and other hominins. Interestingly, our mandibles have pulled back so far from the prognathism of earlier hominins that we gained an extra structure at the most anterior point, called the <strong>mental eminence<\/strong>. You know this structure as the chin. At the skeletal level, it resembles an upside-down \u201cT\u201d at the centerline of the mandible (Pearson 2008). Looking back at archaic humans, you will see that they all lack a chin. Instead, their mandibles curve straight back without a forward point. What is the chin for and how did it develop? Flora Gr\u00f6ning and colleagues (2011) found evidence of the chin\u2019s importance by simulating physical forces on computer models of different mandible shapes. Their results showed that the chin acts as structural support to withstand strain on the otherwise gracile mandible.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Postcranial Gracility<\/em><\/h4>\n<figure style=\"width: 368px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image16-5.png\" alt=\"Two complete skeletons. The left is taller with a thinner frame.\" width=\"368\" height=\"575\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.3: Anterior views of modern (left) and archaic (right) Homo sapiens skeletons. The modern human has an overall gracile appearance at this scale as well. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Modern and archaic Homo sapiens skeletons (Figure 12.3)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The rest of the modern human skeleton is also more gracile than its archaic counterpart. The differences are clear when comparing a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> with a cold-adapted Neanderthal (Sawyer and Maley 2005), but the trends are still present when comparing modern and archaic humans within Africa (Pearson 2000). Overall, a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> postcranial skeleton has thinner cortical bone, smoother features, and more slender shapes when compared to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> (Figure 13.3). Comparing whole skeletons, modern humans have longer limb proportions relative to the length and width of the torso, giving us lankier outlines.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Why is our skeleton so gracile compared to those of other hominins? Natural selection can drive the gracilization of skeletons in several ways (Lieberman 2015). A slender frame is believed to be adapted for the efficient long-distance running ability that started with <em>Homo erectus<\/em>. Furthermore, it is argued that slenderness is a genetic adaptation for cooling an active body in hotter climates, which aligns with the ample evidence that Africa was the home continent of our species.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Behavioural Modernity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Aside from physical differences in the skeleton, researchers have also uncovered evidence of behavioural changes associated with increased cultural complexity from archaic to modern humans. How did cultural complexity develop? Two investigations into this question are archaeology and the analysis of reconstructed brains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Archaeology tells us much about the behavioural complexity of past humans by interpreting the significance of material culture. In terms of advanced culture, items created with an artistic flair, or as decoration, speak of abstract thought processes (Figure 13.4). The demonstration of difficult artistic techniques and technological complexity hints at social learning and cooperation as well. According to paleoanthropologist John Shea (2011), one way to track the complexity of past behaviour through artifacts is by measuring the variety of tools found together. The more types of tools constructed with different techniques and for different purposes, the more modern the behaviour. Researchers are still working on an archaeological way to measure cultural complexity that is useful across time and place.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 221px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image15-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"A brown standing statue of a human figure with cat\u2019s head.\" width=\"221\" height=\"392\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.4: Carved ivory figure called \u201cthe Lion-Man of the Hohlenstein-Stadel.\u201d It dates to the Aurignacian culture, between 35 and 40 kya. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Loewenmensch1.jpg\">Loewenmensch1<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Dagmar_Hollmann\">Dagmar Hollmann<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The interpretation of brain anatomy is another promising approach to studying the evolution of human behaviour. When looking at investigations on this topic in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains, researchers found a weak association between brain size and test-measured intelligence (Pietschnig Et al. 2015). Additionally, they found no association between intelligence and biological sex. These findings mean that there are more significant factors that affect tested intelligence than just brain size. Since the sheer size of the brain is not useful for weighing intelligence within a species, paleoanthropologists are instead investigating the differences in certain brain structures. The differences in organization between modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> brains may reflect different cognitive priorities that account for modern human culture. As with the archaeological approach, new discoveries will refine what we know about the human brain and apply that knowledge to studying the distant past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Taken together, the cognitive abilities in modern humans may have translated into an adept use of tools to enhance survival. Researchers Patrick Roberts and Brian A. Stewart (2018) call this concept the <strong>generalist-specialist niche<\/strong>: our species is an expert at living in a wide array of environments, with populations culturally specializing in their own particular surroundings. The next section tracks how far around the world these skeletal and behavioural traits have taken us.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">First Africa, Then the World<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">What enabled modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> to expand its range further in 300,000 years than <em>Homo erectus<\/em> did in 1.5 million years? The key is the set of derived biological traits from the last section. It is theorized that the gracile frame and neurological anatomy allowed modern humans to survive and even flourish in the vastly different environments they encountered. Based on multiple types of evidence, the source of all of these modern humans was Africa. Instead of originating from just one location, evidence shows that modern Homo sapiens evolution occurred in a complex gene flow network across Africa, a concept called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1760\">African multiregionalism<\/a><\/strong> (Scerri Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">This section traces the origin of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and the massive expansion of our species across all of the continents (except Antarctica) by 12,000 years ago. While modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> first shared geography with archaic humans, modern humans eventually spread into lands where no human had gone before. Figure 13.5 shows the broad routes that our species took expanding around the world. I encourage you to make your own timeline with the dates in this part to see the overall trends.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image13-6.png\" alt=\"315 to 195 KYA. Northern to eastern coasts of Africa are shaded.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-5.png\" alt=\"195-100 KYA. Africa, southern Europe and Asia are shaded\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image27-3.png\" alt=\"99 to 30 KYA. Africa, Indonesia, Australia, and southern portions of Europe and Asia are shaded.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 554px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image30-2.png\" alt=\"29 to 9 KYA. Shading covers most land except Antarctica, Greenland, and some islands.\" width=\"554\" height=\"428\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.5a-d: Four maps depicting the estimated range of modern Homo sapiens through time. The shaded area is based on geographical connections across known sites. Note the growth in the area starting in Africa and the oftentimes-coastal routes that populations followed. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Four maps depicting the estimated range of modern Homo sapiens through time<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Elyssa Ebding at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.csuchico.edu\/geop\/geoplace\/index.shtml\">GeoPlace, California State University, Chico<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><strong> Biology and Culture in Africa<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">We start with the ample fossil evidence supporting the theory that modern humans originated in Africa during the Middle Pleistocene, having evolved from African archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The earliest dated fossils considered to be modern actually have a mosaic of archaic and modern traits, showing the complex changes from one type to the other. Experts have various names for these transitional fossils, such as <strong><strong>Early Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong> or Early Anatomically Modern Humans<\/strong>. However they are labeled, the presence of some modern traits means that they illustrate the origin of the modern type. Three particularly informative sites with fossils of the earliest modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> are Jebel Irhoud, Omo, and Herto.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 281px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image9-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"3D image of a human cranium with pronounced brow ridges.\" width=\"281\" height=\"282\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.6: Composite rendering of the Jebel Irhoud hominin based on micro-CT scans of multiple fossils from the site. The facial structure is within the modern human range, while the braincase is between the archaic and modern shapes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/homo-sapiens\/presskit.html\">A composite reconstruction of the earliest known Homo sapiens fossils from Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) based on micro computed tomographic scans<\/a> by Philipp Gunz, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eva.mpg.de\/index.html\">MPI EVA Leipzig<\/a>, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Recall from the start of the chapter that the most recent finds at Jebel Irhoud are now the oldest dated fossils that exhibit some facial traits of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Besides Irhoud 10, the cranium that was dated to 315,000 years ago (Hublin Et al. 2017; Richter Et al. 2017), there were other fossils found in the same deposit that we now know are from the same time period. In total there are at least five individuals, representing life stages from childhood to adulthood. These fossils form an image of high variation in skeletal traits. For example, the skull named Irhoud 1 has a primitive brow ridge, while Irhoud 2 and Irhoud 10 do not (Figure 13.6). The braincases are lower than what is seen in the modern humans of today but higher than in archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. The teeth also have a mix of archaic and modern traits that defy clear categorization into either group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Research separated by nearly four decades uncovered fossils and artifacts from the Kibish Formation in the Lower Omo Valley in Ethiopia. These Omo Kibish hominins were represented by braincases and fragmented postcranial bones of three individuals found kilometers apart, dating back to around 233,000 years ago (Day 1969; McDougall, Brown, and Fleagle 2005; Vidal Et al. 2022). One interesting finding was the variation in braincase size between the two more-complete specimens: while the individual named Omo I had a more globular dome, Omo II had an archaic-style long and low cranium.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Also in Ethiopia, a team led by Tim White (2003) excavated numerous fossils at Herto. There were fossilized crania of two adults and a child, along with fragments of more individuals. The dates ranged between 160,000 and 154,000 years ago. The skeletal traits and stone-tool assemblage were both intermediate between the archaic and modern types. Features reminiscent of modern humans included a tall braincase and thinner zygomatic (cheek) bones than those of archaic humans (Figure 13.7). Still, some archaic traits persisted in the Herto fossils, such as the supraorbital tori. Statistical analysis by other research teams concluded that at least some cranial measurements fit just within the modern human range (McCarthy and Lucas 2014), favouring categorization with our own species.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 373px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image4-3.jpg\" alt=\"Replica cranium showing wide brow ridges and gracile face.\" width=\"373\" height=\"373\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.7: This model of the Herto cranium showing its mosaic of archaic and modern traits. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-sapiens-idaltu-bou-vp-16-1-herto-skull-BH-045\/category\/all-fossil-hominids\/fossil-hominids\">Homo sapiens idaltu BOU-VP-16\/1 Herto Cranium<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The timeline of material culture suggests a long period of relying on similar tools before a noticeable diversification of artifacts types. Researchers label the time of stable technology shared with archaic types the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1766\"><strong>Middle Stone Age<\/strong><\/a>, while the subsequent time of diversification in material culture is called the<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1767\"> <strong>Later Stone Age<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In the Middle Stone Age, the sites of Jebel Irhoud, Omo, and Herto all bore tools of the same flaked style as archaic assemblages, even though they were separated by almost 150,000 years. The consistency in technology may be evidence that behavioural modernity was not so developed. No clear signs of art dating back this far have been found either. Other hypotheses not related to behavioural modernity could explain these observations. The tool set may have been suitable for thriving in Africa without further innovation. Maybe works of art from that time were made with media that deteriorated or perhaps such art was removed by later humans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Evidence of what <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> did in Africa from the end of the Middle Stone Age to the Later Stone Age is concentrated in South African cave sites that reveal the complexity of human behaviour at the time. For example, Blombos Cave, located along the present shore of the Cape of Africa facing the Indian Ocean, is notable for having a wide variety of artifacts. The material culture shows that toolmaking and artistry were more complex than previously thought for the Middle Stone Age. In a layer dated to 100,000 years ago, researchers found two intact ochre-processing kits made of abalone shells and grinding stones (Henshilwood Et al. 2011). Marine snail shell beads from 75,000 years ago were also excavated (Figure 13.8; d\u2019Errico Et al. 2005). Together, the evidence shows that the Middle Stone Age occupation at Blombos Cave incorporated resources from a variety of local environments into their culture, from caves (ochre), open land (animal bones and fat), and the sea (abalone and snail shells). This complexity shows a deep knowledge of the region\u2019s resources and their use\u2014not just for survival but also for symbolic purposes.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 563px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image5-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Multiple views of shells with holes bored through them.\" width=\"563\" height=\"482\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.8: Examples of the perforated shell beads found in Blombos Cave, South Africa: (a) view of carved hole seen from the inside; (b) arrows indicate worn surfaces due to repetitive contact with other objects, such as with other beads or a connecting string; (c) traces of ochre; and (d) four shell beads showing a consistent pattern of perforation. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:BBC-shell-beads.jpg\">BBC-shell-beads<\/a> by Chenshilwood (Chris Henshilbood and Francesco d\u2019Errico) at <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/\">English Wikipedia<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">On the eastern coast of South Africa, Border Cave shows new African cultural developments at the start of the Later Stone Age. Paola Villa and colleagues (2012) identified several changes in technology around 43,000 years ago. Stone-tool production transitioned from a slower process to one that was faster and made many <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1777\">microliths<\/a><\/strong>, small and precise stone tools. Changes in decorations were also found across the Later Stone Age transition. Beads were made from a new resource: fragments of ostrich eggs shaped into circular forms resembling present-day breakfast cereal O\u2019s (d\u2019Errico Et al. 2012). These beads show a higher level of altering one\u2019s own surroundings and a move from the natural to the abstract in terms of design.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Expansion into the Middle East and Asia<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> lived across Africa, some members eventually left the continent. These pioneers could have used two connections to the Middle East or West Asia. From North Africa, they could have crossed the Sinai Peninsula and moved north to the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1769\"><strong>Levant<\/strong><\/a>, or eastern Mediterranean. Finds in that region show an early modern human presence. Other finds support the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1770\">Southern Dispersal model<\/a><\/strong>, with a crossing from East Africa to the southern Arabian Peninsula through the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb. It is tempting to think of one momentous event in which people stepped off Africa and into the Middle East, never to look back. In reality, there were likely multiple waves of movement producing gene flow back and forth across these regions as the overall range pushed east. The expanding modern human population could have thrived by using resources along the southern coast of the Arabian Peninsula to South Asia, with side routes moving north along rivers. The maximum range of the species then grew across Asia.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Modern <\/em>Homo sapiens<em> in the Middle East<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Geographically, the Middle East is the ideal place for the African modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> population to inhabit upon expanding out of their home continent. In the Eastern Mediterranean coast of the Levant, there is a wealth of skeletal and material culture linked to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. Recent discoveries from Saudi Arabia further add to our view of human life just beyond Africa.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The Caves of Mount Carmel in present-day Israel have preserved skeletal remains and artifacts of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, the first-known group living outside Africa. The skeletal presence at Misliya Cave is represented by just part of the left upper jaw of one individual, but it is notable for being dated to a very early time, between 194,000 and 177,000 years ago (Hershkovitz Et al. 2018). Later, from 120,000 to 90,000 years ago, fossils of multiple individuals across life stages were found in the caves of Es-Skhul and Qafzeh (Shea and Bar-Yosef 2005). The skeletons had many modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> traits, such as globular crania and more gracile postcranial bones when compared to Neanderthals. Still, there were some archaic traits. For example, the adult male Skhul V also possessed what researchers Daniel Lieberman, Osbjorn Pearson, and Kenneth Mowbray (2000) called marked or clear occipital bunning. Also, compared to later modern humans, the Mount Carmel people were more robust. Skhul V had a particularly impressive brow ridge that was short in height but sharply jutted forward above the eyes (Figure 13.9). The high level of preservation is due to the intentional burial of some of these people. Besides skeletal material, there are signs of artistic or symbolic behaviour. For example, the adult male Skhul V had a boar\u2019s jaw on his chest. Similarly, Qafzeh 11, a juvenile with healed cranial trauma, had an impressive deer antler rack placed over his torso (Figure 13.10; Coqueugniot Et al. 2014). Perforated seashells coloured with <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1806\"><strong>ochre<\/strong><\/a>, mineral-based pigment, were also found in Qafzeh (Bar-Yosef Mayer, Vandermeersch, and Bar-Yosef 2009).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 484px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image6-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Side view of a skull replica with a globular braincase.\" width=\"484\" height=\"484\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.9: This Skhul V cranium model shows the sharp browridges. The contour of a marked occipital bun is barely visible from this angle. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/homo-sapiens-skull-skhul-5-BH-032\">Homo sapiens Skull Skhul 5<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 484px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image26-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Human skeleton in a stony matrix. Ribs are visible below the antlers.\" width=\"484\" height=\"312\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.10 This cast of the Qafzeh 11 burial shows the antler\u2019s placement over the upper torso. The forearm bones appear to overlap the antler. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Moulage_de_la_s%C3%A9pulture_de_l'individu_%22Qafzeh_11%22_(avec_ramure_de_cervid%C3%A9),_homme_de_N%C3%A9andertal.jpg\">Moulage de la s\u00e9pulture de l'individu \"Qafzeh 11\" (avec ramure de cervid\u00e9), homme de N\u00e9andertal<\/a> (Collections du Mus\u00e9um national d'histoire naturelle de Paris, France) by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Eunostos\">Eunostos<\/a> has been modified (cropped and colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">One remaining question is, what happened to the modern humans of the Levant after 90,000 years ago? Another site attributed to our species did not appear in the region until 47,000 years ago. Competition with Neanderthals may have accounted for the disappearance of modern human occupation since the Neanderthal presence in the Levant lasted longer than the dates of the early modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. John Shea and Ofer Bar-Yosef (2005) hypothesized that the Mount Carmel modern humans were an initial expansion from Africa that failed. Perhaps they could not succeed due to competition with the Neanderthals who had been there longer and had both cultural and biological adaptations to that environment.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Modern <\/em>Homo sapiens<em> of China<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A long history of paleoanthropology in China has found ample evidence of modern human presence. Four notable sites are the caves at Fuyan, Liujiang, Tianyuan, and Zhoukoudian. In the distant past, these caves would have been at least seasonal shelters that unintentionally preserved evidence of human presence for modern researchers to discover.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">At Fuyan Cave in Southern China, paleoanthropologists found 47 adult teeth associated with cave formations dated to between 120,000 and 80,000 years ago (Liu Et al. 2015). It is currently the oldest-known modern human site in China, though other researchers question the validity of the date range (Michel Et al. 2016). The teeth have the small size and gracile features of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> dentition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The fossil Liujiang (or Liukiang) hominin (67,000 years ago) has derived traits that classified it as a modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, though primitive archaic traits were also present. In the skull, which was found nearly complete, the Liujiang hominin had a taller forehead than archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> but also had an enlarged occipital region (Figure 13.11; Brown 1999; Wu Et al. 2008). Other parts of the skeleton also had a mix of modern and archaic traits: for example, the femur fragments suggested a slender length but with thick bone walls (Woo 1959).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 486px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-1-2.jpg\" alt=\"A human skull with very slight brow ridges and an extremely globular braincase.\" width=\"486\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.11: The Liujiang cranium shows the tall forehead and overall gracile appearance typical of modern Homo sapiens. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Liujiang_cave_skull-a._Homo_Sapiens_68,000_Years_Old.jpg\">Liujiang cave skull-a. Homo Sapiens 68,000 Years Old<\/a> (Taken at the David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins, <a href=\"https:\/\/naturalhistory.si.edu\/visit\">Smithsonian Natural History Museum<\/a>) by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/14405058@N08\">Ryan Somma<\/a> has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another Chinese site to describe here is the one that has been studied the longest. In the Zhoukoudian Cave system (Figure 13.12), where <em>Homo erectus<\/em> and archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> have also been found, there were three crania of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>. These crania, which date to between 34,000 and 10,000 years ago, were all more globular than those of archaic humans but still lower and longer than those of later modern humans (Brown 1999; Harvati 2009). When compared to one another, the crania showed significant differences from one another. Comparison of cranial measurements to other populations past and present found no connection with modern East Asians, again showing that human variation was very different from what we see today.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-1.jpg\" alt=\"A cave opening amongst a dry wooded region.\" width=\"610\" height=\"458\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.12: The entrance to the Upper Cave of the Zhoukoudian complex, where crania of three ancient modern humans were found. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Zhoukoudian_Upper_Cave.jpg\">Zhoukoudian Upper Cave<\/a> by Mutt is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Crossing to Australia<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Expansion of the first modern human Asians, still following the coast, eventually entered an area that researchers call <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1772\">Sunda<\/a><\/strong> before continuing on to modern Australia. Sunda was a landmass made up of the modern-day Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Java, and Borneo. Lowered sea levels connected these places with land bridges, making them easier to traverse. Proceeding past Sunda meant navigating <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1773\">Wallacea<\/a><\/strong>, the archipelago that includes the Indonesian islands east of Borneo. In the distant past, there were many <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_864\">megafauna<\/a><\/strong>, large animals that migrating humans would have used for food and materials (such as utilizing animals\u2019 hides and bones). Further southeast was another landmass called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1774\">Sahul<\/a><\/strong>, which included New Guinea and Australia as one contiguous continent. Based on fossil evidence, this land had never seen hominins or any other primates before modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> arrived. Sites along this path offer clues about how our species handled the new environment to live successfully as foragers.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image18-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"A cranium showing a diagonal sloping forehead.\" width=\"380\" height=\"252\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.13: Replica of the Kow Swamp 1 cranium. The shape of the braincase could be due to artificial cranial modification. A competing hypothesis is that it reflects the primitive shape of Homo erectus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Kow_Swamp1-Homo_sapiens.jpg\">Kow Swamp1-Homo sapiens<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/14405058@N08\">Ryan Somma<\/a> from Occoquan, USA, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 2.0 License<\/a> has been modified (background cleaned and colour modified) and is available here under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The skeletal remains at Lake Mungo, land traditionally owned by Mutthi Mutthi, Ngiampaa, and Paakantji peoples, are the oldest known in the continent. The now-dry lake was one of a series located along the southern coast of Australia in New South Wales, far from where the first people entered from the north (Barbetti and Allen 1972; Bowler Et al. 1970). Two individuals dating to around 40,000 years ago show signs of artistic and symbolic behaviour, including intentional burial. The bones of Lake Mungo 1 (LM1), an adult female, were crushed repeatedly, coloured with red ochre, and cremated (Bowler Et al. 1970). Lake Mungo 3 (LM3), a tall, older male with a gracile cranium but robust postcranial bones, had his fingers interlocked over his pelvic region (Brown 2000).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Kow Swamp, within traditional Yorta Yorta land also in southern Australia, contained human crania that looked distinctly different from the ones at Lake Mungo (Durband 2014; Thorne and Macumber 1972). The crania, dated between 9,000 and 20,000 years ago, had extremely robust brow ridges and thick bone walls, but these were paired with globular features on the braincase (Figure 13.13).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">While no fossil humans have been found at the Madjedbebe rock shelter in the North Territory of Australia, more than 10,000 artifacts found there show both behavioural modernity and variability (Clarkson Et al. 2017). They include a diverse array of stone tools and different shades of ochre for rock art, including mica-based reflective pigment (similar to glitter). These impressive artifacts are as far back as 56,000 years old, providing the date for the earliest-known presence of humans in Australia.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>From the Levant to Europe<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The first modern human expansion into Europe occurred after other members of our species settled in East Asia and Australia. As the evidence from the Levant suggests, modern human movement to Europe may have been hampered by the presence of Neanderthals.\u00a0<span style=\"margin: 0px;padding: 0px\">It is suggested that another obstacle was the colder climate, which was incompatible with the biology of modern\u00a0<em>Homo sapiens<\/em>\u00a0from Africa, as they were adapted to high temperatures and ultraviolet radiation.<\/span>\u00a0Still, by 40,000 years ago, modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> had a detectable presence. This time was also the start of the Later Stone Age or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1775\">Upper Paleolithic<\/a><\/strong>, when there was an expansion in cultural complexity. There is a wealth of evidence from this region due to a Western bias in research, the proximity of these findings to Western scientific institutions, and the desire of Western scientists to explore their own past.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 323px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image11-3.jpg\" alt=\"Robust cranium with a gradually sloping forehead.\" width=\"323\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.14: This side view of the Oase 2 cranium shows the reduced brow ridges but also occipital bunning that is a sign that modern Homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthals. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\/human-fossils\/fossils\/oase-2\">Oase 2<\/a> by James Di Loreto &amp; Donald H. Hurlbert, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: Human Evolution Evidence, Human Fossils] has been modified (sharpened) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In Romania, the site of Pe\u0219tera cu Oase (Cave of Bones) had the oldest-known remains of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> in Europe, dated to around 40,000 years ago (Trinkaus Et al. 2003a). Among the bones and teeth of many animals were the fragmented cranium of one person and the mandible of another (the two bones did not fit each other). Both bones have modern human traits similar to the fossils from the Middle East, but they also had Neanderthal traits. Oase 1, the mandible, had a mental eminence but also extremely large molars (Trinkaus Et al. 2003b). This mandible has yielded DNA that surprisingly is equally similar to DNA from present-day Europeans and Asians (Fu Et al. 2015). This means that Oase 1 was not the direct ancestor of modern Europeans. The Oase 2 cranium has the derived traits of reduced brow ridges along with archaic wide zygomatic cheekbones and an occipital bun (Figure 13.14; Rougier Et al. 2007).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dating to around 26,000 years ago, P\u0159edmost\u00ed near P\u0159erov in the Czech Republic was a site where people buried over 30 individuals along with many artifacts. Eighteen individuals were found in one mass burial area, a few covered by the scapulae of woolly mammoths (Germonpr\u00e9, L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Sablin 2012). The P\u0159edmost\u00ed crania were more globular than those of archaic humans but tended to be longer and lower than in later modern humans (Figure 13.15; Velem\u00ednsk\u00e1 Et al. 2008). The height of the face was in line with modern residents of Central Europe. There was also skeletal evidence of dog domestication, such as the presence of dog skulls with shorter snouts than in wild wolves (Germonpr\u00e9, L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Sablin Et al. 2012). In total, P\u0159edmost\u00ed could have been a settlement dependent on mammoths for subsistence and the artificial selection of early domesticated dogs.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 423px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image25-3.png\" alt=\"Black-and-white photograph of a human skull with labeled cranial landmarks.\" width=\"423\" height=\"389\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.15: This illustration is based upon one of the surviving photographic negatives since the original fossil was lost in World War II. The modern human chin is prominent, as is an archaic occipital bun. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:P%C5%99edmost%C3%AD_9.png\">P\u0159edmost\u00ed 9<\/a> by J. Matiegka (1862\u20131941) has been modified (sharpened) and is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The sequence of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> technological change in the Later Stone Age has been thoroughly dated and labeled by researchers working in Europe. Among them, the Gravettian tradition of 33,000 years to 21,000 years ago is associated with most of the known curvy female figurines, often assumed to be \u201cVenus\u201d figures. Hunting technology also advanced in this time with the first known boomerang, <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1792\"><strong>atlatl<\/strong><\/a> (spear thrower), and archery. The Magdalenian tradition spread from 17,000 to 12,000 years ago. This culture further expanded on fine bone tool work, including barbed spearheads and fishhooks (Figure 13.16).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 511px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image2-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Long, thin spear tips. Many have barbs, others are smooth.\" width=\"511\" height=\"494\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.16: This drawing from 1891 shows an array of Magdalenian-style barbed points found in the burial of a reindeer hunter. They were carved from antler. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:La_station_quaternaire_de_Raymonden_(...)Hardy_Michel_bpt6k5567846s_(2).jpg\">La station quaternaire de Raymonden (...)Hardy Michel bpt6k5567846s (2)<\/a> by M. F\u00e9auxis, original by Michel Hardy (1891), is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Among the many European sites dating to the Later Stone Age, the famous cave art sites deserve mention. Chauvet-Pont-d'Arc Cave in southern France dates to separate Aurignacian occupations 31,000 years ago and 26,000 years ago. Over a hundred art pieces representing 13 animal species are preserved, from commonly depicted deer and horses to rarer rhinos and owls. Another French cave with art is Lascaux, which is several thousand years younger at 17,000 years ago in the Magdalenian period. At this site, there are over 6,000 painted figures on the walls and ceiling (Figure 13.17). Scaffolding and lighting must have been used to make the paintings on the walls and ceiling deep in the cave. Overall, visiting Lascaux as a contemporary must have been an awesome experience: trekking deeper in the cave lit only by torches giving glimpses of animals all around as mysterious sounds echoed through the galleries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 605px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"Charcoal painting of a bull seen from the side.\" width=\"605\" height=\"454\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.17: Photograph of just one surface with cave art at Lascaux Cave. The most prominent piece here is the Second Bull, found in a chamber called the Hall of Bulls. Smaller cattle and horses are also visible. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/en\/documents\/108435\">Lascaux cave (document 108435) Prehitoric Sites and Decorated Caves of the V\u00e9z\u00e8re Valley (France)<\/a> by Francesco Bandarin, <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/\">\u00a9 UNESCO<\/a>, has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/whc.unesco.org\/en\/licenses\/6\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Special Topic: Cannibalism and Culture - Mortuary Practices in Modern Homo sapiens<\/h2>\n<p>Within a 2017 publication in the <em>Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em>, Saladi\u00e9 and Rodr\u00edguez-Hidalgo bring light to traces of early cannibalism in western Eurasia, arguing that context-specific cannibalistic practices were present throughout the Pleistocene and increased notably from the end of the Upper Palaeolithic and onward (Saladi\u00e9 &amp; Rodriguez-Hidalgo, 2017). While early hominins and Neandertals are recognized in this research, the authors highlight the presence of these mortuary practices in a cluster of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> sites. More recent research uncovers similar findings that back these claims as well, where human bones in Herto Ethiopia, Maszycka Cave Poland, and Gough\u2019s Cave in the United Kingdom show anthropogenic defleshing and other modifications which have been interpreted as cannibalism (Pobiner, Et al. 2023). These findings suggest that cannibalistic behaviours formed a recurring aspect of modern human behaviour in certain ecological and cultural contexts.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_817\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-817\" style=\"width: 378px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\" wp-image-817\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/d_-_briana_pobiner_-_figure_6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"378\" height=\"369\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-817\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.18: Close-up photos of three fossil animal specimens from the same area and time horizon as the fossil hominin tibia studied by the research team. These fossils show similar cut marks to those found on the hominin tibia studied. The photos show (a) an antelope mandible, (b) an antelope radius (lower front leg bone) and (c) a large mammal scapula (shoulder blade). Credit: <em data-start=\"617\" data-end=\"635\">23-199D Figure 6<\/em> by Smithsonian\u2019s National Museum of Natural History, from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago\">Humans\u2019 Evolutionary Relatives Butchered One Another 1.45 Million Years Ago<\/a>,\" \u00a9 Smithsonian Institution, used with permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A significant example comes from the Neolithic levels of Fontbr\u00e9gua Cave in southeastern France, where Paola Villa and colleagues compared clusters of human bones with the remains of wild and domestic animals from the same sediments. The study found that human bodies were butchered, processed, and most likely eaten in a way that parallels animal carcass treatment, including the placement and timing of cut marks, dismemberment sequences, and perimortem fractures to open marrow cavities (Villa, Et al. 1986). As the assemblage comes from a primary depositional context with pristine preservation and careful excavation, the authors suggest that cannibalism is the only satisfactory explanation for the pattern of cut marks and breakage seen on the human bones.<\/p>\n<p>More recent work has furthered this hypothesis for Late Upper Palaeolithic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>, especially in Magdalenian contexts. In a 2023 study, researchers combined archeological and genetic evidence from fifty-nine Magdalenian sites, concluding that this specific culture shows an unusually high frequency of cannibalistic cases compared to earlier and later hominin groups; so much so that they identify \u201cprimary burial and cannibalism\u201d as the two main mortuary expressions (Marsh &amp; Bello, 2023). Additionally, new analyses from Maszycka Cave in Poland have described cut and broken human bones in patterns consistent with human consumption, reinforcing this cannibalism hypothesis (Marginedas &amp; Saladi\u00e9, 2025). Together, these studies suggest that for some Magdalenian groups, mortuary cannibalism was a habitual way of disposing of the dead, not just a one-off crisis response. At the same time, researchers emphasize that not every modified skeleton indicates blatant consumption of the dead and that ritual or symbolic perspectives must also be considered. Previously noted in chapter 12, Ullrich\u2019s survey of European mortuary practices presents frequent manipulations of corpses from the Palaeolithic through the Hallstatt period. Said manipulations include cut marks, dismemberment, skull fracturing, and marrow extraction (Ullrich, 2005, p. 258), which Ullrich interprets as cannibalistic rites embedded in cult ceremonies rather than everyday subsistence. In the author\u2019s view, some Palaeolithic groups may have believed that consuming members of their community allowed them to take on the strengths,<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_819\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-819\" style=\"width: 265px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-819\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/a_-_briana_pobiner_-_figure_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"265\" height=\"379\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-819\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.19: View of the hominin tibia and magnified area that shows cut marks. Scale = 4 cm. Credit: 23-199A Figure 1 by Jennifer Clark, Smithsonian Institution, from \"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago\">Humans\u2019 Evolutionary Relatives Butchered One Another 1.45 Million Years Ago<\/a>,\" \u00a9Smithsonian Institution, used with permission.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>abilities, or even mental aspects of their dead member; the act of cannibalism may have functioned as a form of appropriating physical and mental powers rather than simply obtaining calories. With that, Neolithic assemblages show how careful taphonomic work can distinguish cuts linked to interpersonal violence from those associated with systemic butchery (Marginedas &amp; Saladi\u00e9, 2025). The findings seek to highlight that some <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> populations combined ritual, mortuary, and nutritional motives when processing human remains.<\/p>\n<p>These past and contemporary findings are significant for future anthropology students as they shed light on biological anthropology methodology and interpretation. Archaeologists are able to distinguish between occasions when humans were handled like any other carcass and times when they were handled in more symbolic ways thanks to factors like cut mark orientation, the timing of bone breakage, and direct comparison with animal remains. Readers interested in exploring this topic further should investigate the context-specific motivations for cannibalism, like nutritional stress, warfare, funerary sites, or ritual power appropriation.<\/p>\n<p>Similar archeological techniques have been used to explore behaviours of cannibalism among Indigenous Huron-Wendat populations in 1651 Canada, where human bones exhibit cutmarks, perimortem fractures, and thermal modifications (Spence &amp; Jackson, 2014). These shared taphonomic signatures across continents reveal recurring practices under ecological stress, bridging prehistoric Europe to North American contexts. Engaging with such analytical techniques opens up new ways that archeologists and anthropologists can investigate the variability in human behaviour, from nutritional crises to mortuary rituals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Peopling of the Americas<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">By 25,000 years ago, our species was the only member of <em>Homo<\/em> left on Earth. Gone were the Neanderthals, Denisovans, <em>Homo naledi,<\/em> and <em>Homo floresiensis<\/em>. The range of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> kept expanding eastward into\u2014using the name given to this area by Europeans much later\u2014the Western Hemisphere. This section will address what we know about the peopling of the Americas, from the first entry to these continents to the rapid spread of Indigenous Americans across its varied environments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While evidence points to an ancient land bridge called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1778\"><strong>Beringia<\/strong><\/a> that allowed people to cross from what is now northeastern Siberia into modern-day Alaska, what people did to cross this land bridge is still being investigated. For most of the 20th century, the accepted theory was the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1779\"><strong>Ice-Free Corridor model<\/strong><\/a>. It stated that northeast Asians (East Asians and Siberians) first expanded across Beringia inland through a passage between glaciers that opened into the western Great Plains of the United States, just east of the Rocky Mountains, around 13,000 years ago (Swisher Et al. 2013). While life up north in the cold environment would have been harsh, migrating birds and an emerging forest might have provided sustenance as generations expanded through this land (Potter Et al. 2018).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">However, in recent decades, researchers have accumulated evidence against the Ice-Free Corridor model. Archaeologist K. R. Fladmark (1979) brought the alternate <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1780\"><strong>Coastal Route model<\/strong><\/a> into the archaeological spotlight; researcher Jon M. Erlandson has been at the forefront of compiling support for this theory (Erlandson Et al. 2015). The new focus is the southern edge of the land bridge instead of its center: About 16,000 years ago, members of our species expanded along the coastline from northeast Asia, east through Beringia, and south down the Pacific Coast of North America while the inland was still sealed off by ice. The coast would have been free of ice at least part of the year, and many resources would have been found there, such as fish (e.g., salmon), mammals (e.g., whales, seals, and otters), and plants (e.g., seaweed).<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>South through the Americas<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">When the first modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> reached the Western Hemisphere, the spread through the Americas was rapid. Multiple migration waves crossed from North to South America (Posth Et al. 2018). Our species took advantage of the lack of hominin competition and the bountiful resources both along the coasts and inland. The Americas had their own wide array of megafauna, which included woolly mammoths (Figure 13.20), mastodons, camels, horses, ground sloths, giant tortoises, and\u2014a favourite of researchers\u2014a two-meter-tall beaver. The reason we cannot see these amazing animals today may be that resources gained from these fauna were crucial to the survival for people over 12,000 years ago (Araujo Et al. 2017). Several sites are notable for what they add to our understanding of the distant past in the Americas, including interactions with megafauna and other elements of the environment.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 242px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image3-2-1.jpg\" alt=\"A mammoth model with long curving tusks.\" width=\"242\" height=\"323\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.20: Life-size reconstruction of a woolly mammoth at the Page Museum, part of the La Brea Tar Pits complex in Los Angeles, California. Outside of Africa, megafauna such as this went extinct around the time that humans entered their range. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Woolly Mammoth<\/a> (at <a href=\"https:\/\/tarpits.org\/\">La Brea Tar Pits &amp; Museum<\/a>) by Keith Chan is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A 2019 discovery may allow researchers to improve theories about the peopling of the Americas. In White Sands National Park, New Mexico, 60 human footprints have been astonishingly dated to around 22,000 years ago (Bennett Et al. 2021). This date and location do not match either the Ice-Free Corridor or Coastal Route models. Researchers are now working to verify the find and adjust previous models to account for the new evidence. This groundbreaking find is sparking new theories; it is another example of the fast pace of research performed on our past.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Monte Verde is a landmark site that shows that the human population had expanded down the whole vertical stretch of the Americas to Chile by 14,600 years ago. The site has been excavated by archaeologist Tom D. Dillehay and his team (2015). The remains of nine distinct edible species of seaweed at the site shows familiarity with coastal resources and relates to the Coastal Route model by showing a connection between the inland people and the sea.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 254px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image21-4.png\" alt=\"A long stone point with small chips around the edge.\" width=\"254\" height=\"362\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.21: The Clovis point has a distinctive structure. It has a wide tip, and its base has two small projections. This example was carved from chert and found in north-central Ohio, dated to around 11,000 years ago. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/object\/chndm_15.2012.25\">Clovis Point<\/a> (15.2012.25) by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [Department of Anthropology; Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Named after the town in New Mexico, the Clovis stone-tool style is the first example of a widespread culture across much of North America, between 13,400 and 12,700 years ago (Miller, Holliday, and Bright 2013). Clovis points were fluted with two small projections, one on each end of the base, facing away from the head (Figure 13.21). The stone points found at this site match those found as far as the Canadian border and northern Mexico, and from the west coast to the east coast of the United States. Fourteen Clovis sites also contained the remains of mammoths or mastodons, suggesting that hunting megafauna with these points was an important part of life for the Clovis people. After the spread of the Clovis style, it diversified into several regional styles, keeping some of the Clovis form but also developing their own unique touches.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Big Picture: The Assimilation Hypothesis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">How do researchers make sense of all of these modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> discoveries that cover over 300,000 years of time and stretch across every continent except Antarctica? How was modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> related to archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1782\">Assimilation hypothesis<\/a><\/strong> proposes that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> evolved in Africa first and expanded out but also interbred with the archaic <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> they encountered outside Africa (Figure 13.22). This hypothesis is powerful since it explains why Africa has the oldest modern human fossils, why early modern humans found in Europe and Asia bear a resemblance to the regional archaics, and why traces of archaic DNA can be found in our genomes today (Dannemann and Racimo 2018; Reich Et al. 2010; Reich Et al. 2011; Slatkin and Racimo 2016; Smith Et al. 2017; Wall and Yoshihara Caldeira Brandt 2016).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 443px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image28-2.png\" alt=\"African Homo erectus expands and gives rise to archaics and modern Homo sapiens groups.\" width=\"443\" height=\"471\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.22: This diagram shows archaic humans, having evolved from Homo erectus, expanded from Africa and established the Neanderthal and Denisovan groups. In Africa, archaic humans evolved modern traits and expanded from the continent as well, interbreeding with two archaic groups across Europe and Asia. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Assimilation Model (Figure 12.23)l<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Keith Chan and Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While researchers have produced a model that satisfies the data, there are still a lot of questions for paleoanthropologists to answer regarding our origins. What were the patterns of migration in each part of the world? Why did the archaic humans go extinct? In what ways did archaic and modern humans interact? The definitive explanation of how our species started and what our ancestors did is still out there to be found. You are now in a great place to welcome the next discovery about our distant past\u2014maybe you\u2019ll even contribute to our understanding as well.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Chain Reaction of Agriculture<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While it may be hard to imagine today, for most of our species\u2019 existence we were nomadic: moving through the landscape without a singular home. Instead of a refrigerator or pantry stocked with food, we procured nutrition and other resources as needed based on what was available in the environment. This section gives an overview of how the foraging lifestyle enabled the expansion of our species and how the invention of a new way of life caused a chain reaction of cultural change.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Foraging Tradition<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">There are a variety of possible <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1783\">subsistence strategies<\/a><\/strong>, or methods of finding sustenance and resources. To understand our species is to understand the subsistence strategy of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1114\">foraging<\/a><\/strong>, or the search for resources in the environment. While most (but not all) humans today live in cultures that practice <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1784\">agriculture<\/a> <\/strong>(whereby we greatly shape the environment to mass produce what we need), we have spent far more time as nomadic foragers than as settled agriculturalists. As such, it has been suggested that our traits have evolved to be primarily geared toward foraging. For instance, our efficient bipedalism allows persistence-hunting across long distances as well as movement from resource to resource.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">How does human foraging, also known as hunting and gathering, work? Anthropologists have used all four fields to answer this question (see Ember n.d.). Typically, people formed <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1785\"><strong>bands<\/strong><\/a>, or kin-based groups of around 50 people or less (rarely over 100). A band\u2019s organization would be <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1786\"><strong>e<\/strong><strong>galitarian<\/strong><\/a>, with a flexible hierarchy based on an individual\u2019s age, level of experience, and relationship with others. Everyone would have a general knowledge of the skills assigned to their gender roles, rather than specializing in different occupations. A band would be able to move from place to place in the environment, using knowledge of the area to forage (Figure 13.23). In varied environments\u2014from savannas to tropical forests, deserts, coasts, and the Arctic circle\u2014people found sustenance needed for survival.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 565px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image22.jpg\" alt=\"A hunter holding a bow is crouched among dry grass.\" width=\"565\" height=\"377\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.23: A present-day San man in Namibia demonstrates hunting using archery. Anthropologists study the San today to learn about the persistence of foraging as a viable lifestyle, while noting how these cultures have changed over time and how they interact with other groups. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/charlesfred\/2129551464\">San hunter w\u0131th bow and arrow<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/charlesfred\/\">CharlesFred<\/a> has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Humans made extensive use of the foraging subsistence strategy, but this lifestyle did have limitations. The ease of foraging depended on the richness of the environment. Due to the lack of storage, resources had to be dependably found when needed. While a bountiful environment would require just a few hours of foraging a day and could lead to a focus on one location, the level and duration of labor increased greatly in poor or unreliable environments. Labor was also needed to process the acquired resources, which contributed to the foragers\u2019 daily schedule (Crittenden and Schnorr 2017).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The adaptations to foraging found in modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> may explain why our species became so successful both within Africa and in the rapid expansion around the world. Overcoming the limitations, each generation at the edge of our species\u2019s range would have found it beneficial to expand a little further, keeping contact with other bands but moving into unexplored territory where resources were more plentiful. The cumulative effect would have been the spread of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> across continents and hemispheres.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Why Agriculture?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">After hundreds of thousands of years of foraging, some groups of people around 12,000 years ago started to practice agriculture. This transition, called the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1787\"><strong>Neolithic Revolution<\/strong>,<\/a> occurred at the start of the <strong>Holocene<\/strong> epoch. While the reasons for this global change are still being investigated, two likely co-occurring causes are a growing human population and natural global climate change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Overcrowding could have affected the success of foraging in the environment, leading to the development of a more productive subsistence strategy (Cohen 1977). Foraging works best with low population densities since each band needs a lot of space to support itself. If too many people occupy the same environment, they deplete the area faster. The high population could exceed the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1788\">carrying capacity<\/a><\/strong>, or number of people a location can reliably support. Reaching carrying capacity on a global level due to growing population and limited areas of expansion would have been an increasingly pressing issue after the expansion through the major continents by 14,600 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A changing global climate immediately preceded the transition to agriculture, so researchers have also explored a connection between the two events. Since the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1789\">Last Glacial Maximum<\/a><\/strong> of 23,000 years ago, the Earth slowly warmed. Then, from 13,000 to 11,700 years ago, the temperature in most of the Northern Hemisphere dropped suddenly in a phenomenon called the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1790\"><strong>Younger Dryas<\/strong>.<\/a> Glaciers returned in Europe, Asia, and North America. In Mesopotamia, which includes the Levant, the climate changed from warm and humid to cool and dry. The change would have occurred over decades, disrupting the usual nomadic patterns and subsistence of foragers around the world. The disruption to foragers due to the temperature shift could have been a factor in spurring a transition to agriculture. Researchers Gregory K. Dow and colleagues (2009) believe that foraging bands would have clustered in the new resource-rich places where people started to direct their labor to farming the limited area. After the Younger Dryas ended, people expanded out of the clusters with their agricultural knowledge (Figure 13.24).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 570px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image7-6.png\" alt=\"Map shows that agriculture was invented in at least six parts of the world.\" width=\"570\" height=\"267\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.24: The map shows the areas where agriculture was independently invented around the world and where they spread. Blue arrows show the spread of agriculture from these zones to other regions. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1VUDKMBJYS_jNONjLxT04jQN0_z9Ua50BRN6auGSHUuU\/edit\">A full text description of this image is available<\/a>. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture.svg\">Centres of origin and spread of agriculture<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Joe_Roe\">Joe Roe<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The double threat of the limitation of human continental expansion and the sudden global climate change may have placed bands in peril as more populations outpaced their environment\u2019s carrying capacity. Not only had a growing population may have led to increased competition with other bands, but environments worldwide had shifted to create more uncertainty. As such, it has been proposed that as people in different areas around the world faced this unpredictable situation, they became the independent inventors of agriculture.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agriculture around the World<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Due to global changes to the human experience starting from 12,000 years ago, it has been suggested that cultures with no knowledge of each other turned toward intensely farming their local resources (see Figure 13.24).\u00a0 It is proposed that the first farmers engaged in artificial selection of their domesticates to enhance useful traits over generations. The switch to agriculture took time and effort with no guarantee of success and constant challenges (e.g. fires, droughts, diseases, and pests). The regions with the most widespread impact in the face of these obstacles became the primary centers of agriculture (Figure 13.25; Fuller 2010):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Mesopotamia: The Fertile Crescent from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers through the Levant was where bands started to domesticate plants and animals around 12,000 years ago. The connection between the development of agriculture and the Younger Dryas was especially strong here. Farmed crops included wheat, barley, peas, and lentils. This was also where cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats were domesticated.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">South and East Asia: Multiple regions across this land had varieties of rice, millet, and soybeans by 10,000 years ago. Pigs were farmed with no connection to Mesopotamia. Chickens were also originally from this region, bred for fighting first and food second.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">New Guinea: Agriculture started here 10,000 years ago. Bananas, sugarcane, and taro were native to this island. Sweet potatoes were brought back from voyages to South America around the year C.E. 1000. No known animal farming occurred here.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Mesoamerica: Agriculture from Central Mexico to northern South America also occurred from 10,000 years ago; it was also only plant based. Maize was a crop bred from teosinte grass, which has become one of the global staples. Beans, squash, and avocados were also grown in this region.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">The Andes: Starting around 8,000 years ago, local domesticated plants started with squash but later included potatoes, tomatoes, beans, and quinoa. Maize was brought down from Mesoamerica. The main farm animals were llamas, alpacas, and guinea pigs.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Sub-Saharan Africa: This region went through a change 5,000 years ago called the Bantu expansion. The Bantu agriculturalists were established in West Central Africa and then expanded south and east. Native varieties of rice, yams, millet, and sorghum were grown across this area. Cattle were also domesticated here.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Eastern North America: This region was the last major independent agriculture center, from 4,000 years ago. Squash and sunflower are the produce from this region that are most known today, though sumpweed and pitseed goosefoot were also farmed. Hunting was still the main source of animal products.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure style=\"width: 482px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image23-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Farmers plow a flooded field. Each plow is pulled by two oxen. \" width=\"482\" height=\"320\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.25: Rice farmers in the present day using draft cattle to prepare their field. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ricephotos\/7554483250\">Plowing muddy field using cattle<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ricephotos\/\">IRRI Photos<\/a> (International Rice Research Institute) has been modified (colour modified) and is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">By 5,000 years ago, our species was well within the Neolithic Revolution. Agriculturalists spread to neighboring parts of the world with their domesticates, further expanding the use of this subsistence strategy. From this point, the human species changed from being primarily foragers to primarily agriculturalists with skilled control of their environments. The planet changed from mostly unaffected by human presence to being greatly transformed by humans. The revolution took millennia, but it was a true revolution as our species\u2019 lifestyle was dramatically reshaped.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Cultural Effects of Agriculture<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The worldwide adoption of agriculture altered the course of human culture and history forever. The core change in human culture due to agriculture is the move toward not moving: rather than live a nomadic lifestyle, farmers had to remain in one area to tend to their crops and livestock. The term for living bound to a certain location is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1793\">sedentarism<\/a><\/strong>. This led to new aspects of life that were uncommon among foragers: the construction of permanent shelters and agricultural infrastructure, such as fields and irrigation, plus the development of storage technology, such as pottery, to preserve extra resources in case of future instability.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 359px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"Multistory buildings surrounding a greek-style plaza.\" width=\"359\" height=\"270\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.26: View of downtown San Diego taken by the author at a shopping complex during a break from jury duty. Here, people live amongst structures that facilitate commerce, government, tourism, and art. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Downtown San Diego (October 13, 2016; Figure 12.28)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Keith Chan is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\"> CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The high productivity of successful agriculture sparked further changes (Smith 2009). It is argued that since successful agriculture produced a much greater amount of food and other resources per unit of land compared to foraging, the population growth rate skyrocketed. The surplus of a bountiful harvest also provided insurance for harder times, reducing the risk of famine and bringing change to society as well. With a few farming households producing enough food to feed many others, people could start specializing in roles such as craftspeople, traders, religious figures, and artists, spurring innovation in these areas as people could now devote time and effort toward specific skills. These interdependent people would settle an area together for convenience, and over time, the growth of these settlements led to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1794\">urbanization<\/a><\/strong>, the founding of cities that became the foci of human interaction (Figure 13.26).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The formation of cities led to new issues that sparked the growth of further specializations, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1795\">institutions<\/a><\/strong>. These are cultural constructs that exist beyond the individual and have wide control over a population. Leadership of these cities became hierarchical with different levels of rank and control. The stratification of society increased social inequality between those with more or less power over others. Under leadership, people built impressive <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1796\">monumental architecture<\/a><\/strong>, such as pyramids and palaces, that embodied the wealth and power of these early cities. Alliances could unite cities, forming the earliest states. In several regions of the world, state organization expanded into empires, wide-ranging political entities that covered a variety of cultures.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Urbanization brought new challenges as well. The concentration of sedentary peoples was ideal for infectious diseases to thrive since they could jump from person to person and even from livestock to person (Armelagos, Brown, and Turner 2005). While successful agriculture provided a large surplus of food to thwart famine, the food produced offered less diverse food sources than foragers\u2019 diets (Cohen and Armelagos 1984; Cohen and Crane-Kramer 2007). This shift in nutrition caused other diseases to flourish among those who adopted farming, such as dental cavities and malocclusion (the misalignment of teeth caused by soft, agricultural diets). The need to extract \u201cwisdom teeth\u201d or third molars seen in agricultural cultures today stems from this misalignment between the environment our ancestors adapted to and our lifestyles today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As the new disease trends show, the adoption of agriculture and the ensuing cultural changes were not entirely positive. It is also important to note that this is not an absolutely linear progression of human culture from simple to complex. In many cases, empires have collapsed and, in some cases, cities dispersed to low-density bands that rejected institutions. However, a global trend has emerged since the adoption of agriculture, wherein population and social inequality have increased, leading to the massive and influential nation-states of today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The rise of states in Europe has a direct impact on many of this book\u2019s topics. Science started as a European cultural practice by the upper class that became a standardized way to study the world. Education became an institution to provide a standardized path toward producing and gaining knowledge. The scientific study of human diversity, embroiled in the race concept that still haunts us today, was connected to the European slave trade and colonialism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Also starting in Europe, the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century turned cities into centers of mass manufacturing and spurred the rapid development of inventions (Figure 13.27). In the technologically interconnected world of today, human society has reached a new level of complexity with <strong>globalization<\/strong>. In this system, goods are mass-produced and consumed in different parts of the world, weakening the reliance on local farms and factories. The imbalanced relationship between consumers and producers of goods further increases economic inequality.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 465px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image1-3.jpg\" alt=\"A yellow farm vehicle driving into crops in a field.\" width=\"465\" height=\"310\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.27: This combine harvester can collect and process grain at a massive scale. Our food now commonly comes from enormous farms located around the world. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Combine_CR9060.jpeg\">Combine CR9060<\/a> by Hertzsprung is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As states based on agriculture and industry keep exerting influence on humanity today, there are people, like the Hadzabe of Tanzania, who continue to live a lifestyle centered on foraging. Due to the overwhelming force that agricultural societies exert, foragers today have been marginalized to live in the least habitable parts of the world\u2014the areas that are not conducive to farming, such as tropical rainforests, deserts, and the Arctic (Headland Et al. 1989). Foragers can no longer live in the abundant environments that humans would have enjoyed before the Neolithic Revolution. Interactions with agriculturalists are typically imbalanced, with trade and other exchanges heavily favouring the larger group. One of anthropology\u2019s important roles today is to intelligently and humanely manage equitable interactions between people of different backgrounds and levels of influence.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Indigenous Land Management<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Insight into the lives of past modern humans has evolved as researchers revise previous theories and establish new connections with Indigenous knowledge holders.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The outdated view of foraging held that people lived off of the land without leaving an impact on the environment. Accompanying this idea was anthropologist Marshall Sahlins\u2019s (1968) proposal that foragers were the \u201coriginal affluent society\u201d since they were meeting basic needs and achieving satisfaction with less work hours than agriculturalists and city-dwellers. This view countered an earlier idea that foragers were always on the brink of starvation. Sahlins\u2019s theory took hold in the public eye as an attractive counterpoint to our busy contemporary lives in which we strive to meet our endless wants.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A fruitful type of study involving researchers collaborating with Indigenous experts has found that foragers did not just live off the land with minimal effort nor were they barely surviving in unchanging environments. Instead, they shaped the landscape to their needs using labor and strategies that were more subtle than what European colonizers and subsequent researchers were used to seeing. Research from two regions shows the latest developments in understanding Indigenous land management.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In British Columbia, Canada, the bridging of scientific and Indigenous perspectives has shown that the forests of the region are not untouched wilderness but, rather, have been crafted by Indigenous peoples thousands of years ago. Forest gardens adjacent to archaeological sites show higher plant diversity than unmanaged places even after 150 years (Armstrong Et al. 2021). On the coast, 3,500-year-old archaeological sites are evidence of constructed clam gardens, according to Indigenous experts (Lepofsky Et al. 2015). Another project, in consultation with Elders of the T\u2019exelc (William Lakes First Nation) in British Columbia, introduced researchers to explanations of how forests were managed before the practice was disrupted by European colonialism (Copes-Gerbitz Et al. 2021). Careful management of controlled fires reduced the density of the forest to favour plants such as raspberries and allow easier movement through the landscape.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Similarly, the study of landscapes in Australia, in consultation with Aboriginal Australians today, shows that areas previously considered wilderness by scientists were actually the result of controlling fauna and fires. The presence of grasslands with adjacent forests were purposely constructed to attract kangaroos for hunting (Gammage 2008). People also managed other animal and insect life, from emus to caterpillars. In Tasmania, a shift from productive grassland to wildfire-prone rainforest occurred after Aboriginal Australian land management was replaced by British colonial rule (Fletcher, Hall, and Alexander 2021). The site of Budj Bim of the Gunditjmara people has archaeological features of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1798\">aquaculture<\/a><\/strong>, or the farming of fish, that date back 6,600 years (McNiven Et al. 2012; McNiven Et al. 2015). These examples show that Indigenous knowledge of how to manipulate the environment may be invaluable at the state level, such as by creating an Aboriginal ranger program to guide modern land management.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">The Future of Humanity<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A common question stemming from understanding human evolution is: What will the genetic and biological traits of our species be hundreds of thousands of years in the future? When faced with this question, people tend to think of directional selection. Maybe our braincases will be even larger, resembling the large-headed and small-bodied aliens of science fiction (Figure 13.28). Or, our hands could be specialized for interacting with our touch-based technology with less risk of repetitive injury. These ideas do not stand up to scrutiny. Since natural selection is based on adaptations that increase reproductive success, any directional change must be due to a higher rate of producing successful offspring compared to other alleles. Larger brains and more agile fingers would be convenient to possess, but they do not translate into an increase in the underlying allele frequencies.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 571px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8-4.png\" alt=\"One human has typical features; the other has a tall braincase.\" width=\"571\" height=\"279\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 13.28: Will we evolve toward even more globular brains? Actually, this trend is not likely to continue for our species. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-14\/\">Hypothetical image of future human evolution (Figure 12.30)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Scientists are hesitant to professionally speculate on the unknowable, and we will never know what is in store for our species one thousand or one million years from now, but there are two trends in human evolution that may carry on into the future: increased genetic variation and a reduction in regional differences.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Rather than a directional change, genetic variation in our species could expand. Our technology can protect us from extreme environments and pathogens, even if our biological traits are not tuned to handle these stressors. The rapid pace of technological advancement means that biological adaptations will become less and less relevant to reproductive success, so nonbeneficial genetic traits will be more likely to remain in the gene pool. Biological anthropologist Jay T. Stock (2008) views environmental stress as needing to defeat two layers of protection before affecting our genetics. The first layer is our cultural adaptations. Our technology and knowledge can reduce pressure on one\u2019s genotype to be \u201cjust right\u201d to pass to the next generation. The second defense is our flexible physiology, such as our acclimatory responses. Only stressors not handled by these powerful responses would then cause natural selection on our alleles. These shields are already substantial, and cultural adaptations will only keep increasing in strength.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The increasing ability to travel far from one\u2019s home region means that there will be a mixing of genetic variation on a global level in the future of our species. In recent centuries, gene flow of people around the world has increased, creating admixture in populations that had been separated for tens of thousands of years. For skin colour, this means that populations all around the world could exhibit the whole range of skin colours, rather than the current pattern of decreasing melanin pigment farther from the equator. The same trend of intermixing would apply to all other traits, such as blood types. While our genetics will become more varied, the variation will be more intermixed instead of regionally isolated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Our distant descendants will not likely be dextrous ultraintellectuals; more likely, they will be a highly variable and mobile species supported by novel cultural adaptations that make up for any inherited biological limitations. Technology may even enable the editing of DNA directly, changing these trends. With the uncertainty of our future, these are just the best-educated guesses for now. Our future is open and will be shaped little by little by the environment, our actions, and the actions of our descendants.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summary<\/span><\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Modern<em> Homo sapiens<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">315,000 years ago to present<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Starting in Africa, then expanding around the world<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Cro-Magnon individuals, discovered 1868 in Dordogne, France. Otzi the Ice Man, discovered 1991 in the Alps between Austria and Italy. Kennewick man, discovered 1996 in Washington state.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">1400 cc average<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Extremely small with short cusps.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">An extremely globular brain case and gracile features throughout the cranium. The mandibular symphysis forms a chin at the anterior-most point.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Gracile skeleton adapted for efficient bipedal locomotion at the expense of the muscular strength of most other large primates.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Extremely extensive and varied culture with many spoken and written languages. Art is ubiquitous. Technology is broad in complexity and impact on the environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The only living hominin. Chimpanzees and bonobos are the closest living relatives.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Summary<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> is the species that took the hominin lifestyle the furthest to become the only living member of that lineage. The largest factor that allowed us to persist while other hominins went extinct was likely our advanced ability to culturally adapt to a wide variety of environments. Our species, with its skeletal and behavioural traits, was well-suited to be generalist-specialists who successfully foraged across most of the world\u2019s environments. The biological basis of this adaptation was our reorganized brain that facilitated innovation in cultural adaptations and intelligence for leveraging our social ties and finding ways to acquire resources from the environment. As the brain\u2019s ability increased, it shaped the skull by reducing the evolutionary pressure to have large teeth and robust cranial bones to produce the modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> face.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Our ability to be generalist-specialists is seen in the geographical range that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> covered in 300,000 years. In Africa, our species formed from multiregional gene flow that loosely connected archaic humans across the continent. People then expanded out to the rest of the continental Eurasia and even further to the Americas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">For most of our species\u2019s existence, foraging was the general subsistence strategy within which people specialized to culturally adapt to their local environment. With omnivorousness and mobility, people found ways to extract and process resources, shaping the environment in return. When resource uncertainty hit the species, people around the world focused on agriculture to have a firmer control of sustenance. The new strategy shifted human history toward exponential growth and innovation, leading to our high dependence on cultural adaptations today.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While a cohesive image of our species has formed in recent years, there is still much to learn about our past. The work of many driven researchers shows that there are amazing new discoveries made all the time that refine our knowledge of human evolution. Technological innovations such as DNA analysis enable scientists to approach lingering questions from new angles. The answers we get allow us to ask even more insightful questions that will lead us to the next revelation. Like the pink limestone strata at Jebel Irhoud, previous effort has taken us so far and you are now ready to see what the next layer of discovery holds.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What are the skeletal and behavioural traits that define modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>? What are the evolutionary explanations for its presence?<\/li>\n<li>What are some creative ways that researchers have learned about the past by studying fossils and artifacts?<\/li>\n<li>How do the discoveries mentioned in \u201cFirst Africa, Then the World\u201d fit the Assimilation model?<\/li>\n<li>What is foraging? What adaptations do we have for this subsistence strategy? Could you train to be a skilled forager?<\/li>\n<li>What are aspects of your life that come from dependence on agriculture and its cultural effects? Where did the ingredients of your favourite foods originate from?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">Key Terms<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>African multiregionalism<\/strong>: The idea that modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> evolved as a complex web of small regional populations with sporadic gene flow among them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Agriculture<\/strong>: The mass production of resources through farming and domestication.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Aquaculture<\/strong>: The farming of fish using techniques such as trapping, channels, and artificial ponds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Assimilation <\/strong><strong>hypothesis<\/strong>: Current theory of modern human origins stating that the species evolved first in Africa and interbred with archaic humans of Europe and Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Atlatl<\/strong>: A handheld spear thrower that increased the force of thrown projectiles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Band<\/strong>: A small group of people living together as foragers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Beringia<\/strong>: Ancient landmass that connected Siberia and Alaska. The ancestors of Indigenous Americans would have crossed this area to reach the Americas.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Carrying capacity<\/strong>: The amount of organisms that an environment can reliably support.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Coastal Route model<\/strong>: Theory that the first Paleoindians crossed to the Americas by following the southern coast of Beringia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Early Modern <\/strong><strong><em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/strong><strong>, Early Anatomically Modern Human<\/strong>: Terms used to refer to transitional fossils between archaic and modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> that have a mosaic of traits. Humans like ourselves, who mostly lack archaic traits, are referred to as Late Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and simply Anatomically Modern Humans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Egalitarian<\/strong>: Human organization without strict ranks. Foraging societies tend to be more egalitarian than those based on other subsistence strategies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Foraging<\/strong>: Lifestyle consisting of frequent movement through the landscape and acquiring resources with minimal storage capacity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Generalist-specialist niche<\/strong>: The ability to survive in a variety of environments by developing local expertise. Evolution toward this niche may have been what allowed modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> to expand past the geographical range of other human species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globalization<\/strong>: A recent increase in the interconnectedness and interdependence of people that is facilitated with long-distance networks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Globular<\/strong>: Having a rounded appearance. Increased globularity of the braincase is a trait of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Gracile<\/strong>: Having a smooth and slender quality; the opposite of robust.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Holocene<\/strong>: The epoch of the Cenozoic Era starting around 12,000 years ago and lasting arguably through the present.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ice-Free Corridor model<\/strong>: Theory that the first Native Americans crossed to the Americas through a passage between glaciers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Institutions<\/strong>: Long-lasting and influential cultural constructs. Examples include government, organized religion, academia, and the economy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Last Glacial Maximum<\/strong>: The time 23,000 years ago when the most recent ice age was the most intense.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Later Stone Age<\/strong>: Time period following the Middle Stone Age with a diversification in tool types, starting around 50,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Levant<\/strong>: The eastern coast of the Mediterranean. The site of early modern human expansion from Africa and later one of the centers of agriculture.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Megafauna<\/strong>: Large ancient animals that may have been hunted to extinction by people around the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mental eminence<\/strong>: The chin on the mandible of modern <em>H. sapiens<\/em>. One of the defining traits of our species.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Microlith<\/strong>: Small stone tool found in the Later Stone Age; also called a bladelet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Middle Stone Age<\/strong>: Time period known for Mousterian lithics that connects African archaic to modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Monumental architecture<\/strong>: Large and labor-intensive constructions that signify the power of the elite in a sedentary society. A common type is the pyramid, a raised crafted structure topped with a point or platform.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Mosaic<\/strong>: Composed from a mix or composite of traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Neolithic Revolution<\/strong>: Time of rapid change to human cultures due to the invention of agriculture, starting around 12,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Ochre<\/strong>: Iron-based mineral pigment that can be a variety of yellows, reds, and browns. Used by modern human cultures worldwide since at least 80,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sahul<\/strong>: Ancient landmass connecting New Guinea and Australia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sedentarism<\/strong>: Lifestyle based on having a stable home area; the opposite of nomadism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Southern Dispersal model<\/strong>: Theory that modern <em>H. sapiens<\/em> expanded from East Africa by crossing the Red Sea and following the coast east across Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Subsistence strategy<\/strong>: The method an organism uses to find nourishment and other resources.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Sunda<\/strong>: Ancient Asian landmass that incorporated modern Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Supraorbital torus<\/strong>: The bony brow ridge across the top of the eye orbits on many hominin crania.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Upper Paleolithic<\/strong>: Time period considered synonymous with the Later Stone Age.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Urbanization<\/strong>: The increase of population density as people settled together in cities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Wallacea<\/strong>: Archipelago southeast of Sunda with different biodiversity than Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Younger Dryas<\/strong>: The rapid change in global climate\u2014notably a cooling of the Northern Hemisphere\u201413,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\"><strong>Websites<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>First-person virtual tour of Lascaux cave with annotated cave art: Minist\u00e8re de la Culture and Mus\u00e9e d\u2019Arch\u00e9ologie Nationale. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/archeologie.culture.fr\/lascaux\/en\/visit-cave\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Visit the cave<\/a>\u201d Lascaux website.<\/p>\n<p>Online anthropology magazine articles related to paleoanthropology and human evolution: SAPIENS. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sapies.org\/category\/evolution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evolution<\/a>.\u201d <em>SAPIENS<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<p>Various presentations of information about hominin evolution: Smithsonian Institution. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">What does it mean to be human?<\/a>\u201d <em>Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<p>Magazine-style articles on archaeology and paleoanthropology: ThoughtCo. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thoughtco.com\/archaeology-4133504\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Archaeology<\/a>.\u201d ThoughtCo. Website.<\/p>\n<p>Database of comparisons across hominins and primates: University of California, San Diego. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/carta.anthropogeny.org\/moca\/domains\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MOCA Domains<\/a>.\u201d <em>Center for Academic Research &amp; Training in Anthropogeny<\/em> website.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Books<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Engaging book that covers human-made changes to the environment with industrialization and globalization: Kolbert, Elizabeth. 2014. <em>The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History<\/em>. New York: Bloomsbury.<\/p>\n<p>Overview of what human life was like among the environmental shifts of the Ice Age: Woodward, Jamie. 2014. <em>The Ice Age: A Very Short Introduction<\/em>. Oxford: OUP Press.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Articles<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Recent review paper about the current state of paleoanthropology research: Stringer, C. 2016. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rstb.2015.0237\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Origin and Evolution of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em><\/a>.\u201d <em>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B<\/em> 371 (1698).<\/p>\n<p>Overview of the history of American paleoanthropology and the many debates that have occurred over the years: Trinkaus, E. 2018. \u201cOne Hundred Years of Paleoanthropology: An American Perspective.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 165 (4): 638\u2013651.<\/p>\n<p>Amazing magazine article that synthesizes hominin evolution and why it is important to study this subject: Wheelwright, Jeff. 2015. \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/discovermagazine.com\/2015\/may\/16-days-of-dysevolution\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Days of Dysevolution<\/a>.\u201d <em>Discover<\/em> 36 (4): 33\u201339.<\/p>\n<p>Fascinating research on \u00d6tzi, a mummy from 5,000 years ago: Wierer, Ursula, Simona Arrighi, Stefano Bertola, G\u00fcnther Kaufmann, Benno Baumgarten, Annaluisa Pedrotti, Patrizia Pernter, and Jacques Pelegrin. 2018. \u201cThe Iceman\u2019s Lithic Toolkit: Raw Material, Technology, Typology and Use.\u201d <em>PLOS One<\/em> 13 (6): e0198292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0198292.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Documentaries<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>PBS NOVA series covering the expansion of modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> and interbreeding with archaic humans: Brown, Nicholas, dir. 2015. <em>First Peoples<\/em>. Edmonton: Wall to Wall Television. Amazon Prime Video.<\/p>\n<p>PBS NOVA special featuring the footprints found in White Sands National Park: Falk, Bella, dir. 2016. <em>Ice Age Footprints<\/em>. Boston: Windfall Films. https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/video\/ice-age-footprints\/.<\/p>\n<p>PBS NOVA special about how modern humans evolved adaptations to different environments. Shows how present-day people live around the world: Thompson, Niobe, dir. 2016. <em>Great Human Odyssey<\/em>. Edmonton: Clearwater Documentary. <a class=\"rId132\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/evolution\/great-human-odyssey.html\">https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/evolution\/great-human-odyssey.html<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">References<\/h2>\n<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Araujo, Bernardo B. A., Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos, Matheus S. Lima-Ribeiro, Jos\u00e9 Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho, and Fernando A. S. Fernandez. 2017. \u201cBigger Kill Than Chill: The Uneven Roles of Humans and Climate on Late Quaternary Megafaunal Extinctions.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 431: 216\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Armelagos, George J., Peter J. Brown, and Bethany Turner. 2005. \u201cEvolutionary, Historical, and Political Economic Perspectives on Health and Disease.\u201d <em>Social Science &amp; Medicine<\/em> 61 (4): 755\u2013765.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Armstrong, C. G., J. E. D. Miller, A. C. McAlvay, P. M. Ritchie, and D. Lepofsky. 2021. \u201cHistorical Indigenous Land-Use Explains Plant Functional Trait Diversity. <em>Ecology and Society<\/em> 26 (2): 6.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bar-Yosef Mayer, Daniella E., Bernard Vandermeersch, and Ofer Bar-Yosef. 2009. \u201cShells and Ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: Indications for Modern Behavior.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 56 (3): 307\u2013314.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Barbetti, M., and H. Allen. 1972. \u201cPrehistoric Man at Lake Mungo, Australia, by 32,000 Years Bp.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 240 (5375): 46\u201348.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bennett, M. R., D. Bustos, J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, T. M. Urban, V. T. Holliday, Sally C. Reynolds, et al. (2021). \u201cEvidence of Humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 373 (6562): 1528\u20131531.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Bowler, J. M., Rhys Jones, Harry Allen, and A. G. Thorne. 1970. \u201cPleistocene Human Remains from Australia: A Living Site and Human Cremation from Lake Mungo, Western New South Wales.\u201d <em>World Archaeology<\/em> 2 (1): 39\u201360.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brown, Peter. 1999. \u201cThe First Modern East Asians? Another Look at Upper Cave 101, Liujiang and Minatogawa 1.\u201d In <em>Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Origins of the Japanese<\/em>, edited by K. Omoto, 105\u2013131. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brown, Peter. 2000. \u201cAustralian Pleistocene Variation and the Sex of Lake Mungo 3.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 38 (5): 743\u2013749.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Clarkson, Chris, Zenobia Jacobs, Ben Marwick, Richard Fullagar, Lynley Wallis, Mike Smith, Richard G. Roberts, et al. 2017. \u201cHuman Occupation of Northern Australia by 65,000 Years Ago.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 547 (7663): 306\u2013310.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan. 1977. <em>The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture.<\/em> New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan, and George J. Armelagos, eds. 1984.<em> Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture<\/em>. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cohen, Mark Nathan, and Gillian M. M. Crane-Kramer, eds. 2007.<em> Ancient Health: Skeletal Indicators of Agricultural and Economic Intensification<\/em>. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Copes-Gerbitz, K., S. Hagerman, and L. Daniels. 2021. \u201cSituating Indigenous Knowledge for Resilience in Fire-Dependent Social-Ecological Systems.\u201d <em>Ecology and Society<\/em> 26(4): 25. https:\/\/www.ecologyandsociety.org\/vol26\/iss4\/art25\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Coqueugniot, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne, Olivier Dutour, Baruch Arensburg, Henri Duday, Bernard Vandermeersch, and Anne-Marie Tillier. 2014. \u201cEarliest Cranio-Encephalic Trauma from the Levantine Middle Palaeolithic: 3-D Reappraisal of the Qafzeh 11 Skull, Consequences of Pediatric Brain Damage on Individual Life Condition and Social Care.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em> 9 (7): e102822.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Crittenden, Alyssa N., and Stephanie L. Schnorr. 2017. \u201cCurrent Views on Hunter\u2010Gatherer Nutrition and the Evolution of the Human Diet.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 162 (S63): 84\u2013109.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">d\u2019Errico, Francesco, Lucinda Backwell, Paola Villa, Ilaria Degano, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Marion K. Bamford, Thomas F. G. Higham, Maria Perla Colombini, and Peter B. Beaumont. 2012. \u201cEarly Evidence of San Material Culture Represented by Organic Artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 109 (33): 13214\u201313219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">d\u2019Errico, Francesco, Christopher Henshilwood, Marian Vanhaeren, and Karen Van Niekerk. 2005. \u201cNassarius Kraussianus Shell Beads from Blombos Cave: Evidence for Symbolic Behaviour in the Middle Stone Age.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 48 (1): 3\u201324.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Dannemann, Michael, and Fernando Racimo. 2018. \u201cSomething Old, Something Borrowed: Admixture and Adaptation in Human Evolution.\u201d <em>Current Opinion in Genetics &amp; Development<\/em> 53: 1\u20138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Day, M. H. 1969. \u201cOmo Human Skeletal Remains.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 222: 1135\u20131138.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dillehay, Tom D., Carlos Ocampo, Jos\u00e9 Saavedra, Andre Oliveira Sawakuchi, Rodrigo M. Vega, Mario Pino, Michael B. Collins, et al. 2015. \u201cNew Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em> 10 (11): e0141923. doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0141923.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dow, Gregory K., Clyde G. Reed, and Nancy Olewiler. 2009. \u201cClimate Reversals and the Transition to Agriculture.\u201d <em>Journal of Economic Growth<\/em> 14 (1): 27\u201353.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Durband, Arthur C. 2014. \u201cBrief Communication: Artificial Cranial Modification in Kow Swamp and Cohuna.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 155 (1): 173\u2013178.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ember, Carol R. N.d. \u201cHunter-Gatherers.\u201d <em>Explaining Human Culture. Human Relations Area Files<\/em>. Accessed March 4, 2023. <a class=\"rId133\" href=\"https:\/\/hraf.yale.edu\/ehc\/summaries\/hunter-gatherers\">https:\/\/hraf.yale.edu\/ehc\/summaries\/hunter-gatherers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Erlandson, Jon M., Todd J. Braje, Kristina M. Gill, and Michael H. Graham. 2015. \u201cEcology of the Kelp Highway: Did Marine Resources Facilitate Human Dispersal from Northeast Asia to the Americas?\u201d <em>The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology<\/em> 10 (3): 392\u2013411.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fladmark, K. R. 1979. \u201cRoutes: Alternate Migration Corridors for Early Man in North America.\u201d <em>American Antiquity<\/em> 44 (1): 55\u201369.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fletcher, M. S., T. Hall, and A. N. Alexandra. 2021. \u201cThe Loss of an Indigenous Constructed Landscape Following British Invasion of Australia: An Insight into the Deep Human Imprint on the Australian Landscape.\u201d <em>Ambio<\/em> 50(1): 138\u2013149.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fu, Qiaomei, Mateja Hajdinjak, Oana Teodora Moldovan, Silviu Constantin, Swapan Mallick, Pontus Skoglund, Nick Patterson, et al. 2015. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from Romania with a Recent Neanderthal Ancestor.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 524 (7564): 216\u2013219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Fuller, Dorian Q. 2010. \u201cAn Emerging Paradigm Shift in the Origins of Agriculture.\u201d <em>General Anthropology<\/em> 17 (2): 1, 8\u201311.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gammage, B. 2008. \u201cPlain Facts: Tasmania under Aboriginal Management.\u201d <em>Landscape Research<\/em> 33 (2): 241\u2013254.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Germonpr\u00e9, Mietje, Martina L\u00e1zni\u010dkov\u00e1-Galetov\u00e1, and Mikhail V. Sablin. 2012. \u201cPalaeolithic Dog Skulls at the Gravettian P\u0159edmost\u00ed Site, the Czech Republic.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 39 (1): 184\u2013202.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Gr\u00f6ning, Flora, Jia Liu, Michael J. Fagan, and Paul O\u2019Higgins. 2011. \u201cWhy Do Humans Have Chins? Testing the Mechanical Significance of Modern Human Symphyseal Morphology with Finite Element Analysis.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 144 (4): 593\u2013606.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Harvati, Katerina. 2009. \u201cInto Eurasia: A Geometric Morphometric Reassessment of the Upper Cave (Zhoukoudian) Specimens.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 57 (6): 751\u2013762.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Headland, Thomas N., Lawrence A. Reid, M. G. Bicchieri, Charles A. Bishop, Robert Blust, Nicholas E. Flanders, Peter M. Gardner, Karl L. Hutterer, Arkadiusz Marciniak, and Robert F. Schroeder. 1989. \u201cHunter-Gatherers and Their Neighbors from Prehistory to the Present.\u201d <em>Current Anthropology<\/em> 30 (1): 43\u201366.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Henshilwood, Christopher S., Francesco d\u2019Errico, Karen L. van Niekerk, Yvan Coquinot, Zenobia Jacobs, Stein-Erik Lauritzen, Michel Menu, and Renata Garc\u00eda-Moreno. 2011. \u201cA 100,000-Year-Old Ochre-Processing Workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 334 (6053): 219\u2013222.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hershkovitz, Israel, Gerhard W. Weber, Rolf Quam, Mathieu Duval, Rainer Gr\u00fcn, Leslie Kinsley, Avner Ayalon, et al. 2018. \u201cThe Earliest Modern Humans Outside Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 359 (6374): 456\u2013459.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Abdelouahed Ben-Ncer, Shara E. Bailey, Sarah E. Freidline, Simon Neubauer, Matthew M. Skinner, Inga Bergmann, et al. 2017. \u201cNew Fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the Pan-African Origin of <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 546 (7657): 289\u2013292.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lepofsky, D., N. F. Smith, N. Cardinal, J. Harper, M. Morris, M., Gitla (Elroy White), Randy Bouchard, et al. 2015. \u201cAncient Shellfish Mariculture on the Northwest Coast of North America.\u201d <em>American Antiquity<\/em> 80 (2): 236\u2013259.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E. 2015. \u201cHuman Locomotion and Heat Loss: An Evolutionary Perspective.\u201d <em>Comprehensive Physiology<\/em> 5 (1): 99\u2013117.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E., Brandeis M. McBratney, and Gail Krovitz. 2002. \u201cThe Evolution and Development of Cranial Form in <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 99 (3): 1134\u20131139.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lieberman, Daniel E., Osbjorn M. Pearson, and Kenneth M. Mowbray. 2000. \u201cBasicranial Influence on Overall Cranial Shape.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 38 (2): 291\u2013315.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Liu, Wu, Mar\u00eda Martin\u00f3n-Torres, Yan-jun Cai, Song Xing, Hao-wen Tong, Shu-wen Pei, Mark Jan Sier, Xiao-hong Wu, R. Lawrence Edwards, and Hai Cheng. 2015. \u201cThe Earliest Unequivocally Modern Humans in Southern China.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 526 (7575): 696-699.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lucas, Peter W. 2007. \u201cThe Evolution of the Hominin Diet from a Dental Functional Perspective.\u201d In <em>Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable<\/em>, edited by Peter S. Ungar, 31\u201338 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Marsh, W. A. &amp; Bello, S. (2023). Cannibalism and burial in the late Upper Palaeolithic: Combining archaeological and genetic evidence. <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em>, 319, 108309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quascirev.2023.108309<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McCarthy, Robert C., and Lynn Lucas. 2014. \u201cA Morphometric Reassessment of Bou-Vp-16\/1 from Herto, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 74: 114\u2013117.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McDougall, Ian, Francis H. Brown, and John G. Fleagle. 2005. \u201cStratigraphic Placement and Age of Modern Humans from Kibish, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 433 (7027): 733\u2013736.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McNiven, I. J., J. Crouch, T. Richards, N. Dolby, and G. Jacobsen. 2012. \u201cDating Aboriginal Stone-Walled Fishtraps at Lake Condah, Southeast Australia.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 39 (2): 268\u2013286.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">McNiven, I., J. Crouch, T. Richards, K. Sniderman, N. Dolby, and G. Mirring. 2015. \u201cPhased Redevelopment of an Ancient Gunditjmara Fish Trap over the Past 800 Years: Muldoons Trap Complex, Lake Condah, Southwestern Victoria.\u201d <em>Australian Archaeology<\/em> 81 (1): 44\u201358.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Michel, V\u00e9ronique, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Valladas, Guanjun Shen, Wei Wang, Jian-xin Zhao, Chuan-Chou Shen, Patricia Valensi, and Christopher J. Bae. 2016. \u201cThe Earliest Modern <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> in China?\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 101: 101\u2013104.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Miller, D. Shane, Vance T. Holliday, and Jordon Bright. 2013. \u201cClovis across the Continent.\u201d In <em>Paleoamerican Odyssey<\/em>, edited by Kelly E. Graf, Caroline V. Ketron, and Michael R. Waters, 207\u2013220. College Station: Texas A&amp;M University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Neubauer, Simon, Jean-Jacques Hublin, and Philipp Gunz. 2018. \u201cThe Evolution of Modern Human Brain Shape.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 4 (1): eaao5961. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aao5961.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pearson, Osbjorn M. 2000. \u201cPostcranial Remains and the Origin of Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 9: 229\u2013247.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pearson, Osbjorn M. 2008. \u201cStatistical and Biological Definitions of \u2018Anatomically Modern\u2019 Humans: Suggestions for a Unified Approach to Modern Morphology.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em> 17 (1): 38\u201348.<\/p>\n<p>Pobiner, B., Pante, M. &amp; Keevil, T. (2023). Early Pleistocene cut marked hominin fossil from Koobi Fora, Kenya. <em>Sci Rep,<\/em> 13, 9896. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-35702-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-35702-7<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Pietschnig, Jakob, Lars Penke, Jelte M. Wicherts, Michael Zeiler, and Martin Voracek. 2015. \u201cMeta-Analysis of Associations between Human Brain Volume and Intelligence Differences: How Strong Are They and What Do They Mean?\u201d <em>Neuroscience &amp; Biobehavioral Reviews<\/em> 57: 411\u2013432.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Posth, Cosimo, Nathan Nakatsuka, Iosif Lazaridis, Pontus Skoglund, Swapan Mallick, Thiseas C. Lamnidis, Nadin Rohland, et al. 2018. \u201cReconstructing the Deep Population History of Central and South America.\u201d <em>Cell<\/em> 175 (5): 1185\u20131197.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Potter, Ben A., James F. Baichtal, Alwynne B. Beaudoin, Lars Fehren-Schmitz, C. Vance Haynes, Vance T. Holliday, Charles E. Holmes, et al. 2018. \u201cCurrent Evidence Allows Multiple Models for the Peopling of the Americas.\u201d <em>Science Advances<\/em> 4 (8): eaat5473. <a class=\"rId134\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aat5473\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.aat5473<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reich, David, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, et al. 2010. \u201cGenetic History of an Archaic Hominin Group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 468 (7327): 1053\u20131060.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Reich, David, Nick Patterson, Martin Kircher, Frederick Delfin, Madhusudan R. Nandineni, Irina Pugach, Albert Min-Shan Ko, et al. 2011. \u201cDenisova Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania.\u201d <em>American Journal of Human Genetics<\/em> 89 (4): 516\u2013528.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Richter, Daniel, Rainer Gr\u00fcn, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Teresa E. Steele, Fethi Amani, Mathieu Ru\u00e9, Paul Fernandes, et al. 2017. \u201cThe Age of the Hominin Fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the Origins of the Middle Stone Age.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 546 (7657): 293\u2013296.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Roberts, Patrick, and Brian A. Stewart. 2018. \u201cDefining the \u2018Generalist-Specialist\u2019 Niche for Pleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em>.\u201d <em>Nature Human Behaviour<\/em> 2: 542\u2013550.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Rougier, Helene, \u015etefan Milota, Ricardo Rodrigo, Mircea Gherase, Lauren\u0163iu Sarcin\u01ce, Oana Moldovan, Jo\u00e3o Zilh\u00e3o, et al. 2007. \u201cPe\u015ftera Cu Oase 2 and the Cranial Morphology of Early Modern Europeans.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 104 (4): 1165\u20131170.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sahlins, Marshall. 1968. \u201cNotes on the Original Affluent Society.\u201d In <em>Man the Hunter<\/em>, edited by R. B. Lee and I. DeVore, 85\u201389. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.<\/p>\n<p>Saladi\u00e9, P. &amp; Rodr\u00edguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017). Archaeological Evidence for Cannibalism in Prehistoric Western Europe: from Homo antecessor to the Bronze Age. <em>Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory<\/em> 24, 1034\u20131071. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-016-9306-y\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10816-016-9306-y<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Sawyer, G. J., and Blaine Maley. 2005. \u201cNeanderthal Reconstructed.\u201d <em>The Anatomical Record (Part B: New Anat.)<\/em> 283 (1): 23\u201331.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scerri, Eleanor M. L., Mark G. Thomas, Andrea Manica, Philipp Gunz, Jay T. Stock, Chris Stringer, Matt Grove, et al. 2018. \u201cDid Our Species Evolve in Subdivided Populations Across Africa, and Why Does It Matter?\u201d <em>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution<\/em> 33 (8): 582\u2013594.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shea, John J. 2011. \u201cRefuting a Myth about Human Origins.\u201d <em>American Scientist<\/em> 99 (2): 128\u2013135.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Shea, John J., and Ofer Bar-Yosef. 2005. \u201cWho Were the Skhul\/Qafzeh People? An Archaeological Perspective on Eurasia\u2019s Oldest Modern Humans.\u201d <em>Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Societ<\/em><em>y<\/em> 35: 451\u2013468.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Slatkin, Montgomery, and Fernando Racimo. 2016. \u201cAncient DNA and Human History.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 113 (23): 6380\u20136387.<\/p>\n<p>Smithsonian Institution. (2023, June 26). <em data-start=\"201\" data-end=\"278\">Humans\u2019 evolutionary relatives butchered one another 1.45 million years ago.<\/em>\u00a0Smithsonian Institution. <a class=\"decorated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener\" data-start=\"321\" data-end=\"431\">https:\/\/www.si.edu\/newsdesk\/releases\/humans-evolutionary-relatives-butchered-one-another-145-million-years-ago<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smith, Fred H., James C. M. Ahern, Ivor Jankovi\u0107, and Ivor Karavani\u0107. 2017. \u201cThe Assimilation Model of Modern Human Origins in Light of Current Genetic and Genomic Knowledge.\u201d <em>Quaternary International<\/em> 450: 126\u2013136.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Smith, Michael. 2009. \u201cV. Gordon Childe and the Urban Revolution: A Historical Perspective on a Revolution in Urban Studies.\u201d <em>Town Planning Review<\/em> 80 (1): 3\u201329.<\/p>\n<p>Spence, M., &amp; Jackson, L. J. (2014). The Bioarchaeology of Cannibalism at the Charity Site.<em> Journal of The Ontario Archaeological Society<\/em> , 94, 65\u201380. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/14371786\/The_Bioarchaeology_of_Cannibalism_at_the_Charity_Site\">https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/14371786\/The_Bioarchaeology_of_Cannibalism_at_the_Charity_Site<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stock, Jay T. 2008. \u201cAre Humans Still Evolving?\u201d <em>EMBO Reports<\/em> 9 (Suppl 1): S51\u2013S54.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Swisher, Mark E., Dennis L. Jenkins, Lionel E. Jackson Jr., and Fred M. Phillips. 2013. \u201cA Reassessment of the Role of the Canadian Ice-Free Corridor in Light of New Geological Evidence.\u201d Poster Symposium 5B: Geology, Geochronology and Paleoenvironments of the First Americans at the Paleoamerican Odyssey Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico, October 16\u201319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Thorne, A. G., and P. G. Macumber. 1972. \u201cDiscoveries of Late Pleistocene Man at Kow Swamp, Australia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 238 (5363): 316\u2013319.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Trinkaus, Erik, \u015etefan Milota, Ricardo Rodrigo, Gherase Mircea, and Oana Moldovan. 2003a. \u201cEarly Modern Human Cranial Remains from the Pe\u015ftera Cu Oase, Romania.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 45 (3): 245\u2013253.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Trinkaus, Erik, Oana Moldovan, Adrian B\u00eelg\u0103r, Lauren\u0163iu Sarcina, Sheela Athreya, Shara E Bailey, Ricardo Rodrigo, Gherase Mircea, Thomas Higham, and Christopher Bronk Ramsey. 2003b. \u201cAn Early Modern Human from the Pe\u015ftera Cu Oase, Romania.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 100 (20): 11231\u201311236.<\/p>\n<p>Ullrich, H. (2005). Cannibalistic rites within mortuary practices from the palaeolithic to middle aged in Europe. Anthropologie (1962-), 43(2\/3), 249\u2013261. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26292739\">http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26292739<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Velem\u00ednsk\u00e1, J., J. Br\u016fzek, P. Velem\u00ednsk\u00fd, L. Bigoni, A. Sefc\u00e1kov\u00e1, and S. Katina. 2008. \u201cVariability of the Upper-Palaeolithic Skulls from Predmost\u00ed Near Prerov (Czech Republic): Craniometric Comparison with Recent Human Standards.\u201d <em>Homo<\/em> 59 (1): 1\u201326.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Vidal, C\u00e9line M., Christine S. Lane, Asfawossen Asrat, Dan N. Barfod, Darren F. Mark, Emma L. Tomlinson, Ambdemichael Zafu Tadesse, et al. (2022). \u201cAge of the Oldest Known <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> from Eastern Africa. <em>Nature<\/em> 601 (7894): 579\u2013583.<\/p>\n<p>Villa, P., Bouville, C., Courtin, J., Helmer, D., Mahieu, E., Shipman, P., Belluomini, G. &amp; Branca, M. (1986). Cannibalism in the Neolithic. <em>Science<\/em>, 233(4762), 431\u2013437. doi:10.1126\/science.233.4762.431<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Villa, Paola, Sylvain Soriano, Tsenka Tsanova, Ilaria Degano, Thomas F. G. Higham, Francesco d\u2019Errico, Lucinda Backwell, Jeannette J. Lucejko, Maria Perla Colombini, and Peter B. Beaumont. 2012. \u201cBorder Cave and the Beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 109 (33): 13208\u201313213.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Wall, Jeffrey D., and Deborah Yoshihara Caldeira Brandt. 2016. \u201cArchaic Admixture in Human History.\u201d <em>Current Opinion in Genetics &amp; Development<\/em> 41: 93\u201397.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">White, Tim D., Berhane Asfaw, David DeGusta, Henry Gilbert, Gary D. Richards, Gen Suwa, and F. Clark Howell. 2003. \u201cPleistocene <em>Homo sapiens<\/em> from Middle Awash, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 423 (6941): 742\u2013747.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Woo, Ju-Kang. 1959. \u201cHuman Fossils Found in Liukiang, Kwangsi, China.\u201d <em>Vertebrata PalAsiatica<\/em> 3 (3): 109\u2013118.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Wu, XiuJie, Wu Liu, Wei Dong, JieMin Que, and YanFang Wang. 2008. \u201cThe Brain Morphology of Homo Liujiang Cranium Fossil by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography.\u201d <em>Chinese Science Bulletin<\/em> 53 (16): 2513\u20132519.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Acknowledgments<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">I could not have undertaken this project without the help of many who got me to where I am today. I extend sincere thank yous to the many colleagues and former students who have inspired me to keep learning and talking about anthropology. Thank you also to all who are involved in this textbook project. The anonymous reviewers truly sparked improvements to the chapter. Lastly, the staff of Starbucks #5772 also contributed immensely to this text.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_954\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_954\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><h2><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-584\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Katie-Nelson-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"250\" \/><\/h2>\n<h2>Katie Nelson, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 1 &amp; 2, Editor Chapter 1-17)<\/h3>\n<p>Inver Hills Community College, kanelson@inverhills.edu<\/p>\n<p>Katie Nelson is an instructor of anthropology and sociology at Inver Hills Community College. She is the recipient of the 2022 Minnesota State Board of Trustees Educator of the Year award. Her research focuses on migration, identity, belonging, and citizenship(s) in human history and in the contemporary United States, Mexico, and Morocco.<\/p>\n<p>She received her B.A. in anthropology and Latin American studies from Macalester College, her M.A. in anthropology from the University of California, Santa Barbara, an M.A. in education and instructional technology from the University of Saint Thomas, and her Ph.D. from <a href=\"https:\/\/occidente.ciesas.edu.mx\/\">CIESAS Occidente (Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropologi\u0301a Socia<\/a>l \u2013Center for Research and Higher Education in Social Anthropology), based in Guadalajara, Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>Katie views teaching and learning as central to her practice as an anthropologist and is co-founder and Associate Editor of <a href=\"https:\/\/teachinglearninganthro.com\/\">Teaching and Learning Anthropology Journal<\/a>. She has contributed to several open access textbook projects, both as an author and an editor, and views the affordability of quality learning materials as an important piece of the equity and inclusion puzzle in higher education.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-585\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Lara-Braff-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"218\" height=\"282\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Lara Braff, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 1 &amp; 2, Editor Chapter 1-17)<\/h3>\n<p>Grossmont College, Lara.Braff@gcccd.edu<\/p>\n<p>Lara Braff is a professor of anthropology at Grossmont College, where she teaches courses in cultural and biological anthropology. She received her B.A. in anthropology and Spanish from the University of California at Berkeley, and her M.A. and Ph.D. in comparative human development from the University of Chicago, where she specialized in medical anthropology.<\/p>\n<p>Lara\u2019s research, teaching, and involvement in open access projects (like this textbook) are rooted in concerns about social equity. In an effort to make college more accessible to all students, she serves as an Open Educational Resources (OER) coordinator at Grossmont College and Liaison for the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges\u2014Open Educational Resources Initiative.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-583\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Beth-Shook-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Beth Shook, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 1 &amp; 2, Editor Chapter 1-17)<\/h3>\n<p>California State University, Chico, bashook@csuchico.edu<\/p>\n<p>Beth Shook is a lecturer in the anthropology department at California State University, Chico. She received her B.A. in anthropology and in molecular biology from Cornell College (in Mount Vernon, Iowa) and her M.A. and Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of California, Davis. While she is broadly trained in anthropology, her research has focused on utilizing DNA in forensic and anthropological contexts.<\/p>\n<p>Beth enjoys teaching a variety of anthropology courses and mentoring graduate students in teaching. Additionally, she leads Chico State\u2019s Affordable Learning Solutions (CAL$) program, is committed to programs that prioritize diversity, and serves on the Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges (SACC) Executive Board.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-611\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Kelsie-Aguilera-Author-Profile-Small.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Kelsie Aguilera, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 1 &amp; 2, Editor Chapter 1-17)<\/h3>\n<p>Leeward Community College, kelsieag@hawaii.edu<\/p>\n<p>Kelsie Aguilera is an associate professor of anthropology at Leeward Community College. Located on the island of O\u2019ahu, Leeward Community College is part of the University of Hawai\u2019i System and holds a special commitment to Native Hawaiian education. At Leeward, Kelsie teaches anthropology courses in all of the subdisciplines.<\/p>\n<p>Kelsie received her B.A. in anthropology from the University of Miami and her M.A. in anthropology from Binghamton University. She is active within the American Anthropological Association and the Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges. She continues to work hard toward making anthropology accessible and relevant for her students.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-587\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Joylin-Namie-Author-Profile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"266\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Joylin Namie, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 3)<\/h3>\n<p>Truckee Meadows Community College, jnamie@tmcc.edu<\/p>\n<p>Joylin Namie is Professor of Anthropology at Truckee Meadows Community College, where she teaches courses in biological and cultural anthropology. Her current research interest is in (un)sustainable tourism in desert environments, particularly in the country of Jordan and the U.S. state of Nevada. She was awarded a fellowship to Jordan from the Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC) in 2020 to explore this topic, including visiting Petra and other important tourism destinations in Jordan. Dr. Namie\u2019s favorite things in life are teaching, traveling, and spending time with her dog, Charley.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-588\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Hayley-Mann-Author-Profile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"259\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Hayley Mann, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 4)<\/h3>\n<p>Binghamton University, hmann3@binghamton.edu<\/p>\n<p>Hayley Mann received her bachelor\u2019s degree in Genetics from the University of California, Davis, and continued her graduate studies in Biological and Molecular Anthropology at the California State University, Sacramento. She is currently a Ph.D. candidate at Binghamton University, where her dissertation focus is on studying genetic variation of Pacific Islanders (Republic of Vanuatu) and also changes in health as the result of colonization. Hayley also works in clinical molecular carrier screening and specializes in DNA-sequencing procedures.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-612\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Andrea-J.-Alveshere-Author-Profile-Large.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Andrea J. Alveshere, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 5)<\/h3>\n<p>Western Illinois University, a-alveshere@wiu.edu, <a href=\"https:\/\/alveshere.com\/\">Andrea Alveshere: Archaeologist &amp; Biological Anthropologist<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Dr. Andrea Alveshere is an associate professor of anthropology and chemistry at Western Illinois University. Her research focuses on relationships between humans and their environments, including cultural and biological adaptations surrounding ancient diet, health, and knowledge systems; genetic disorders such as Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1); effects of environmental factors on the preservation of bones, plant remains, and the molecules within them; and the comparative utility of field and laboratory techniques to produce informative archaeological, nutritional, and forensic data.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Alveshere earned her B.A. in anthropology at the University of Washington with an emphasis in archaeology and an undergraduate research focus on the analysis of skeletal remains and geoarchaeological deposits. At the University of Minnesota, she completed her Ph.D. in anthropology, with a minor in human genetics. Her graduate thesis investigated factors that influence the preservation and detection of DNA in ancient and forensic specimens.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Alveshere also worked for several years as a forensic scientist in the DNA\/Biology section of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Forensic Science Laboratory. She led the WIU Archaeological Field School, on alternate summers since 2017, and conducted archaeological excavations in Israel, South Africa, and throughout the midwestern United States.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-589\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Stephanie-Etting-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"201\" height=\"302\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Stephanie Etting, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 6)<\/h3>\n<p>Sacramento City College and Sonoma State University, ettings@scc.losrios.edu<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Etting became hooked on biological anthropology as a freshman at UC Davis when she took the \u201cIntroduction to Biological Anthropology\u201d course. She obtained her Ph.D. in anthropology in 2011 from UC Davis, where she studied anti-predator behavior toward snakes in rhesus macaques, squirrel monkeys, and black-and-white ruffed lemurs. While in graduate school, Dr. Etting discovered her love of teaching and, since finishing her dissertation, has taught at UC Berkeley; Sonoma State University; UC Davis; California State University, Sacramento; and Sacramento City College.In addition to her interests in primate behavior, Dr. Etting is also very interested in primate evolution and functional anatomy.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-590\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Karin-Enstam-Jaffe-Author-Profile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"256\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Karin Enstam Jaffe, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 7)<\/h3>\n<p>Sonoma State University, karin.jaffe@sonoma.edu<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Karin Enstam Jaffe has loved primates since she was five years old. As an undergraduate at U.C. San Diego, she participated in projects studying orangutans, langurs, and Mona monkeys. She earned her Ph.D. in Anthropology from U.C. Davis studying vervet and patas monkey antipredator behavior in Kenya. She has been a faculty member in the Anthropology Department at Sonoma State University since August 2002. A dedicated teacher-scholar, Dr. Jaffe has won several teaching, scholarship, and mentoring awards, including SSU\u2019s Excellence in Teaching Award, Educational Experience Enhancement Award, and the President\u2019s Excellence in Scholarship Award. In addition to teaching, she has led student research projects on behavioral enrichment involving ring-tailed lemurs, chimpanzees, and sun bears, as well as a study of the social network of hamadryas baboons at Oakland Zoo.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-592\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Sarah-S.-King-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"280\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Sarah S. King, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 8)<\/h3>\n<p>Cerro Coso Community College, sarah.king1@cerrocoso.edu<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Sarah S. King is an anthropology\/sociology professor at Cerro Coso Community College in California. She completed her Ph.D. work at the Division of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences at the University of Bradford in West Yorkshire, England. Her thesis was entitled \u201cWhat Makes War?: Assessing Iron Age Warfare through Mortuary Behavior and Osteological Patterns of Violence.\u201d She also holds anthropology degrees from the University of California, Santa Cruz (B.A. hons., 2004), and the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (M.A., 2006).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-593\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Kara-Jones-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"282\" \/><\/h3>\n<h2>Kara Jones, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 8)<\/h3>\n<p>PhD student at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, jonesk44@unlv.nevada.edu<\/p>\n<p>Kara Jones received their B.A. in anthropology at California State University, Bakersfield (2018) and their M.A. from University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2023, summer). Their master\u2019s thesis is titled \u201cRockin\u2019 at the Lake: Toolstone Use and Procurement along Holocene Lake Ivanpah, CA.\u201d Mx Jones is a Mojave Desert archaeologist specializing in stone tool use and manufacture, focusing further on Holocene lakeshore adaptations.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-594\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Jonathan-M.-G.-Perry-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"254\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Jonathan M. G. Perry, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 9)<\/h3>\n<p>Western University of Health Sciences, Oregon, jperry@westernu.edu<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Perry was trained as a paleontologist and primatologist at the University of Alberta, Duke University, and Stony Brook University. His research focuses on the relationship between food, feeding, and craniodental anatomy in primates both living and extinct. This work includes primate feeding behavior, comparative anatomy, biomechanics, and field paleontology. He has taught courses on primate evolution at the undergraduate and graduate level.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-595\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Stephanie-L.-Canington-Author-Profile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"201\" height=\"183\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Stephanie L. Canington, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 9)<\/h3>\n<p>University of Pennsylvania, scaning@upenn.edu<\/p>\n<p>Stephanie Canington is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. Her current research is on the links between food properties, feeding behavior, and jaw morphology in lemurs that live in varying forms of captivity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-596\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Kerryn-Warren-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" \/><\/h3>\n<h2>Kerryn Warren, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 10)<\/h3>\n<p>Grad Coach International, kerryn.warren@gmail.com<\/p>\n<p>Kerryn Warren is a dissertation coach at Grad Coach International and is passionate about stimulating research thinking in students of all levels. She has lectured on multiple topics, including archaeology and human evolution, with her research and science communication interests including hybridization in the hominin fossil record (stemming from research from her Ph.D.) and understanding how evolution is taught in South African schools. She also worked as one of the \u201cUnderground Astronauts,\u201d selected to excavate Homo naledi remains from the Rising Star Cave System in the Cradle of Humankind.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-597\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/K.-Lindsay-Hunter-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"196\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>K. Lindsay Hunter, M.A., Ph.D. candidate<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 10)<\/h3>\n<p>CARTA, k.lindsay.hunter@gmail.com<\/p>\n<p>Lindsay Hunter is a trained palaeoanthropologist who uses her more than 15 years of experience to make sense of the distant past of our species to build a better future. She received her master\u2019s degree in biological anthropology from the University of Iowa and is completing her Ph.D. in archaeology at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. She has studied fossil and human bone collections across five continents with major grant support from the National Science Foundation (United States) and the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. As a National Geographic Explorer, Lindsay developed and managed the National Geographic\u2013sponsored Umsuka Public Palaeoanthropology Project in the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site (CoH WHS) in South Africa from within Westbury Township, Johannesburg, between 2016\u20132019. She currently serves as the Community Engagement &amp; Advancement Director for CARTA: The UC San Diego\/Salk Institute Center for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny in La Jolla, California.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-598\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Navashni-Naidoo-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"230\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Navashni Naidoo, M.Sc.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 10)<\/h3>\n<p>University of Cape Town, nnaidoo2@illinois.edu<\/p>\n<p>Navashni Naidoo is a researcher at Nelson Mandela University, lecturing on physical geology. She completed her Master\u2019s in Science in Archaeology in 2017 at the University of Cape Town. Her research interests include developing paleoenvironmental proxies suited to the African continent, behavioral ecology, and engaging with community-driven archaeological projects. She has excavated at Stone Age sites across Southern Africa and East Africa. Navashni is currently pursuing a PhD in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Illinois.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-599\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Silindokuhle-Mavuso-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Silindokuhle Mavuso, M.Sc.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 10)<\/h3>\n<p>University of Witwatersrand, S.muvaso@ru.ac.za<\/p>\n<p>Silindokuhle has always been curious about the world around him and how it has been shaped. He is a lecturer at Rhodes University of Witwatersrand (Wits), and conducts research on palaeoenvironmental reconstruction and change of the northeastern Turkana Basin\u2019s Pleistocene sequence. Silindokuhle began his education with a B.Sc. (Geology, Archaeology, and Environmental and Geographical Sciences) from the University of Cape Town before moving to Wits for a B.Sc. Honors (geology and paleontology) and M.Sc. in geology. He is currently concluding his PhD Studies. During this time, he has gained more training as a Koobi Fora Fieldschool fellow (Kenya) as well as an Erasmus Mundus scholar (France). Silindokuhle is a Plio-Pleistocene geologist with a specific focus on identifying and explaining past environments that are associated with early human life and development through time. He is interested in a wide range of disciplines such as micromorphology, sedimentology, geochemistry, geochronology, and sequence stratigraphy. He has worked with teams from significant eastern and southern African hominid sites including Elandsfontein, Rising Star, Sterkfontein, Gondolin, Laetoli, Olduvai, and Koobi Fora.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-600\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Bonnie-Yoshida-Levine-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"201\" height=\"302\" \/><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Bonnie Yoshida-Levine, Ph.D. <\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>(Writer Chapter 11)\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Grossmont College, bonnie.yoshida@gcccd.edu<\/p>\n<p>Bonnie Yoshida-Levine is an instructor of anthropology at Grossmont College, where she teaches biological anthropology and archaeology. She received her bachelor\u2019s degree in history from the University of California, Los Angeles, and her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in anthropology from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Her dissertation research focused on the bioarchaeology of early civilizations in north coastal Peru. Bonnie has also collaborated on archaeological field projects in Bolivia and coastal California.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-601\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Amanda-Wolcott-Paskey-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"280\" \/><\/h3>\n<h2>Amanda Wolcott Paskey, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 12)<\/h3>\n<p>Cosumnes River College, paskeya@crc.losrios.edu<\/p>\n<p>Amanda Wolcott Paskey is an anthropology professor at Cosumnes River College in Sacramento, California. She earned her B.A. and M.A. in anthropology from the University of California, Davis. Her speciality in anthropology is archaeology; however, she was trained in a holistic program and most of her teaching load is in biological anthropology. She is currently working on analyzing a post\u2013gold rush era archaeological site, in Sacramento, with colleagues and students. This project has given her many opportunities to engage in sharing archaeology with a public audience, including local school children and Sacramentans interested in local history.<\/p>\n<h3><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-602\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/AnnMarie-Beasley-Cisneros-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"266\" \/><\/h3>\n<h2>AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 12)<\/h3>\n<p>American River College, beaslea@arc.losrios.edu<\/p>\n<p>AnnMarie Beasley Cisneros is an anthropology professor at American River College in Sacramento, California. Trained as a four-field anthropologist, she earned her B.A. and M.A. in anthropology from California State University, Sacramento. She regularly teaches biological anthropology, among other courses, and is currently engaged in applied anthropology work in community development with historically underserved communities. She most recently has particularly enjoyed facilitating her students\u2019 involvement in projects serving Sacramento\u2019s Latino and immigrant Mexican populations.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-603\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Keith-Chan-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"266\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Keith Chan, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 13)<\/h3>\n<p>Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District and MiraCosta College, drkeithcchan@gmail.com, Dr. Keith Chan is an instructor of anthropology at Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District and MiraCosta College in San Diego County. He reached this step of his anthropological path after many memorable experiences across the country and the hemisphere. He earned a bachelor\u2019s degree in anthropology from the University of California, Berkeley, in 2001. As a graduate student at the University of Missouri, he traveled to Per\u00fa with teams of students to study skeletons in the archaeological record to understand the lives of ancient Andeans. He completed his dissertation and earned a Ph.D. in 2011. Inspired by many educators in his journey, Dr. Chan turned his career toward teaching anthropology and helping students understand and appreciate humanity.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-604\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Michael-B.-C.-Rivera-Author-Profile.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"208\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Michael B. C. Rivera, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 14)<\/h3>\n<p>University of Hong Kong, mrivera@hku.hk<\/p>\n<p>Michael B. C. Rivera is a biological anthropologist and human bioarchaeologist who studies human evolution and history and works to develop these disciplines in Hong Kong, East\/Southeast Asia, and the \u201cGlobal South.\u201d His doctoral thesis focused on the transition into agriculture in coastal environments and adaptations of ancient people along the beach. He is the only biological anthropologist working at the University of Hong Kong and the lead archaeologist managing the excavation of a WWII military aircraft that crashed in Hong Kong in 1945. Michael is also an advocate for greater inclusion, diversity, equality, and access to learning in academia. Much of his work also includes science communication and public engagement activities online, in schools, and in collaboration with museums.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-605\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Leslie-E.-Fitzpatrick-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"266\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Leslie E. Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., RPA<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 15)<\/h3>\n<p>Independent Archaeological Consultants<\/p>\n<p>Lfitzpatrick@iac-llc.net<\/p>\n<p>Leslie Fitzpatrick is an historical archaeologist with Independent Archaeological Consultants based in Dover, New Hampshire. She earned a PhD in Anthropology from the University of Wyoming (2017), an MA in Anthropology from Georgia State (2012), and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech (2000). Her primary research focus is the stable-isotope analysis of human remains as a means of interpreting past mobility and diet profiles for both modern and archaeological populations. In addition to her work as a historical archaeologist in New England, she has worked as a bioarchaeologist at field sites in Germany, Spain, Croatia, Mexico, Peru, and throughout the United States.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-606\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Ashley-Kendell-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"201\" height=\"268\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Ashley Kendell, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 16)<\/h3>\n<p>California State University, Chico, akendell@csuchico.edu<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Ashley Kendell is currently an associate professor and forensic anthropologist at Chico State. Prior to beginning her position at Chico State, she was a visiting professor at the University of Montana and the forensic anthropologist for the state of Montana. Dr. Kendell obtained her doctorate from Michigan State University, and her research interests include skeletal trauma analysis and digitization and curation methods for digital osteological data. She is also a Registry Diplomate of the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators. Throughout her doctoral program, she worked as a medicolegal death investigator for the greater Lansing, Michigan, area and was involved in the investigation of over 200 forensic cases.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-607\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Alex-Perrone-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"266\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Alex Perrone, M.A., M.S.N, R.N., P.H.N.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 16)<\/h3>\n<p>Butte Community College, perroneal@butte.edu<\/p>\n<p>Alex Perrone is a lecturer in anthropology at Butte Community College. She is also a Registered Nurse and a certified Public Health Nurse. She is a former Supervisor of the Human Identification Laboratory in the Department of Anthropology at California State University, Chico. Her research interests include bioarchaeology, paleopathology, forensic anthropology, skeletal biology, California prehistory, and public health. She has worked on bioarchaeological and archaeological projects in Antigua, California, Hawaii, Greece, and the UK, and was an archaeological technician for the USDA Forest Service. She assisted with training courses for local and federal law enforcement agencies and assisted law enforcement agencies with the recovery and analysis of human remains.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-608\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Colleen-Milligan-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"266\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Colleen Milligan, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 16)<\/h3>\n<p>California State University, Chico, cfmilligan@csuchico.edu<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Colleen Milligan is a biological and forensic anthropologist with research interests in bioarchaeology, skeletal biology, and forensic anthropology. She has been a Fellow with the Department of Homeland Security and has assisted in forensic anthropology casework and recoveries in the State of Michigan and California. She has also assisted in community outreach programs in forensic anthropology and forensic science, as well as recovery training courses for local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. She is a certified instructor through Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST). Dr. Milligan serves as the current co-director of the Chico State Human Identification Laboratory.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-609\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Joylin-Namie-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"355\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Joylin Namie, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 17)<\/h3>\n<p>Truckee Meadows Community College, jnamie@tmcc.edu<\/p>\n<p>Joylin Namie is Professor of Anthropology at Truckee Meadows Community College, where she teaches courses in biological and cultural anthropology. Her current research interest is in culturally and environmentally sustainable tourism in desert environments, particularly in the country of Jordan and the U.S. state of Nevada. She was awarded a fellowship to Jordan from the Council of American Overseas Research Centers (CAORC) in 2020 to explore this topic, including visiting Petra and other important tourism destinations in Jordan. Dr. Namie\u2019s favorite things in life are teaching, competing in sports, and traveling.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-610\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Jonathan-Marks-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"216\" \/><\/h3>\n<h2>Jonathan Marks, Ph.D.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 4)<\/h3>\n<p>University of North Carolina at Charlotte, jmarks@uncc.edu<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Marks is Professor of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has published many books and articles on broad aspects of biological anthropology. In 2006 he was elected a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2012 he was awarded the First Citizen\u2019s Bank Scholar\u2019s Medal from UNC Charlotte. In recent years he has been a Visiting Research Fellow at the ESRC Genomics Forum in Edinburgh, a Visiting Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, and a Templeton Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study at Notre Dame. His work has received the W. W. Howells Book Prize and the General Anthropology Division Prize for Exemplary Cross-Field Scholarship from the American Anthropological Association as well as the J. I. Staley Prize from the School for Advanced Research. Two of his books are titled What It Means to Be 98% Chimpanzee and Why I Am Not a Scientist, but actually he is about 98 percent scientist and not a chimpanzee.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-582\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/08\/Adam-P-Johnson-Author-Profile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" \/><\/h2>\n<h2>Adam P. Johnson, M.A.<\/h2>\n<h3>(Writer Chapter 4)<\/h3>\n<p>University of North Carolina at Charlotte\/University of Texas at San Antonio, ajohn344@uncc.edu<\/p>\n<p>Adam Johnson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Texas at San Antonio and part-time lecturer at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He earned his M.A. in anthropology at UNC-Charlotte in 2017 and will complete his Ph.D. in anthropology at UTSA by 2024. His interests include human-animal relations, science studies, primate behavior, ecology, and the history of anthropology. His recent research project analyzes the social, historical, political, and evolutionary dimensions that shape human-javelina encounters. His goal is to understand how humans and animals find ways to get along in a precarious world.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_956\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_956\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Ashley Kendell, Ph.D., California State University, Chico<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Alex Perrone, M.A., M.S.N, R.N., P.H.N., Butte Community College<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Colleen Milligan, Ph.D., California State University, Chico<\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Amelia Roberts, Elyse Racicot, Emmanuelle Hunter<\/h6>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><em>This chapter is a revision from \"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\"><em>Chapter 15: Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d by Ashley Kendell, Alex Peronne, and Colleen Milligan. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Content Warning and Disclaimer:<\/strong> This chapter includes images of human remains as well as discussions centered on human skeletal analyses. All images are derived from casts, sketches, nonhuman skeletal material, as well as non-Indigenous skeletal materials curated within the CSU, Chico Human Identification Lab, and the Hartnett-Fulginiti donated skeletal collection.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\">Learning Objectives<\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Define forensic anthropology as a subfield of biological anthropology.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Describe the seven steps carried out during skeletal analysis.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Outline the four major components of the biological profile.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Contrast the four categories of trauma.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Explain how to identify the different taphonomic agents that alter bone.<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 18pt\">Discuss ethical considerations for forensic anthropology.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1214\">Forensic anthropology<\/a><\/strong> is a subfield of biological anthropology and an applied area of anthropology. Forensic anthropologists use skeletal analysis to gain information about humans in the present or recent past, then they apply this information within a medicolegal context. This means that forensic anthropologists specifically conduct their analysis on recently deceased individuals (typically within the last 50 years) as part of investigations by law enforcement. Forensic anthropologists can assist law enforcement agencies in several different ways, including aiding in the identification of human remains whether they are complete, fragmentary, burned, scattered, or decomposed. Additionally, forensic anthropologists can help determine what happened to the deceased at or around the time of death as well as what processes acted on the body after death (e.g., whether the remains were scattered by animals, whether they were buried in the ground, or whether they remained on the surface as the soft tissue decomposed).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Many times, because of their expertise in identifying human skeletal remains, forensic anthropologists are called to help with outdoor search-and-recovery efforts, such as locating remains scattered across the surface or carefully excavating and documenting buried remains. In other cases, forensic anthropologists recover remains after natural disasters or accidents, such as fire scenes, and can help identify whether each bone belongs to a human or an animal. Forensic anthropology spans a wide scope of contexts involving the law, including incidences of mass disasters, genocide, and war crimes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A point that can be somewhat confusing for students is that although the term <em>forensic<\/em> is included in this subfield of biological anthropology, there are many forensic techniques that are not included in the subfield. Almost exclusively, forensic anthropology deals with skeletal analysis. While this can include the comparison of antemortem (before death) and postmortem (after death) radiographs to identify whether remains belong to a specific person, or using photographic superimposition of the cranium, it does not include analyses beyond the skeleton. For example, blood-spatter analysis, DNA analysis, fingerprints, and material evidence collection do not fall under the scope of forensic anthropology.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">So, what can forensic anthropologists glean from bones alone? Forensic anthropologists can address a number of questions about a human individual based on their skeletal remains. Some of those questions are as follows: How old was the person? Was the person biologically male or female? How tall was the person? What happened to the person at or around their time of death? Were they sick? The information from the skeletal analysis can then be matched with missing persons records, medical records, or dental records, aiding law enforcement agencies with identifications and investigations.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Skeletal Analysis<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Forensic anthropology relies on skeletal analysis to reveal information about the deceased. The methodology and approaches outlined below are specific to the United States. Forensic anthropological methods differ depending on the country conducting an investigation. In the United States, there are typically seven steps or questions to the process:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Is it bone?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Is it human?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Is it modern or archeological?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">How many individuals are present or what is the minimum number of individuals (MNI)?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Who is it?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">Is there evidence of trauma before or around the time of death?<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt\">What happened to the remains after death?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Is It Bone?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">One of the most important steps in any skeletal analysis starts with determining whether or not material suspected to be bone is in fact bone. Though it goes without saying that a forensic anthropologist would only carry out analysis on bone, this step is not always straightforward. Whole bones are relatively easy to identify, but determining whether or not something is bone becomes more challenging once it becomes fragmentary. As an example, in high heat such as that seen on fire scenes, bone can break into pieces. During a house fire with fatalities, firefighters watered down the burning home. After the fire was extinguished, the sheetrock (used to construct the walls of the home) was drenched and crumbled. The crumbled sheetrock was similar in colour and form to burned, fragmented bone, therefore mistakable for human remains (Figure 16.1). Forensic anthropologists on scene were able to separate the bones from the construction material, helping to confirm the presence of bone and hence the presence of individual victims of the fire. In this case, forensic anthropologists were able to recognize the anatomical and layered structure of bone and were able to distinguish it from the uniform and unlayered structure of sheetrock.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/06\/image3.png\" alt=\"Long rectangular sheetrock with exposed porous surface.\" width=\"182\" height=\"208\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 372px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image6-1.png\" alt=\"Two examples of sheetrock with dried or burnt surfaces.\" width=\"372\" height=\"210\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.1: Burned sheetrock used as building material appears similar to human bone but can be differentiated by the fact that it is the same density throughout. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Example of burned sheetrock (Figure 15.1)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As demonstrated by the example above, both the macrostructure (visible with the naked eye) and microstructure (visible with a microscope) of bone are helpful in bone identification. Bones are organs in the body made up of connective tissue. The connective tissue is hardened by a mineral deposition, which is why bone is rigid in comparison to other connective tissues such as cartilage (Tersigni-Tarrant and Langley 2017, 82\u201383; White and Folkens 2005, 31). In a living body, the mineralized tissue does not make up the only component of bone\u2014there are also blood, bone marrow, cartilage, and other types of tissues. However, in dry bone, two distinct layers of the bone are the most helpful for identification. The outer layer is made up of densely arranged osseous (bone) tissue called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1216\">compact (cortical) bone<\/a><\/strong>. The inner layer is composed of much more loosely organized, porous bone tissue whose appearance resembles that of a sponge, hence the name <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1218\"><strong>spongy (trabecular) bone<\/strong><\/a>. Knowing that most bone contains both layers helps with the macroscopic identification of bone (Figures 16.2, 16.3). For example, a piece of coconut shell might look a lot like a fragment of a human skull bone. However, closer inspection will demonstrate that coconut shell only has one very dense layer, while bone has both the compact and spongy layers.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image27-1.png\" alt=\"Drawing showing thick exterior compact bone and porous internal cortical bone.\" width=\"380\" height=\"371\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.2: Cross section of human long bone with compact and cortical bone layers visible. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Cross section of human long bone (Figure 15.2)<\/a> original to<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"> Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Mary Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 364px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image25-2.png\" alt=\"Cranial bone cross section called a periosteum with spongy bone (diploe) and compact bone labeled. Compact bone is a thin slice at the top and bottom and is smooth and hard. Spongy bone is in the middle and has irregular holes and indentations throughout. \" width=\"364\" height=\"184\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.3: Cranial anatomy is slightly different as compared to that of a long bone in cross section. The compact (cortical) bone layers sandwich the spongy (trabecular) bone. One layer of compact bone forms the very outer surface of the skull and the other lines the internal surface of the skull. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/FPtK1zmh@6.27:kwbeYj9S@3\/Bone-Structure\">Anatomy of a Flat Bone (Anatomy &amp; Physiology, Figure 6.3.3)<\/a> by<a href=\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/\"> OpenStax<\/a> is under a<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\"> CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The microscopic identification of bone relies on knowledge of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1220\">osteons<\/a><\/strong>, or bone cells (Figure 16.4). Under magnification, bone cells are visible in the outer, compact layer of bone. The bone cells are arranged in a concentric pattern around blood vessels for blood supply. The specific shape of the cells can help differentiate, for example, a small piece of PVC (white plastic) pipe from a human bone fragment (Figure 16.5).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 340px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image14-3.png\" alt=\"Microscope image showing clustered osteons. Each has many rings and a dark center.\" width=\"340\" height=\"218\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.4: Bone microstructure (osteons). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bone_(248_12)_Bone_cross_section.jpg\">Bone (248 12) Bone cross section<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/cs.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Josef_Reischig\">Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc.<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 332px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image7-1.png\" alt=\"Flat, white section of PVC. Edges are broken and surface rough.\" width=\"332\" height=\"268\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.5: Fragments of plastic PVC pipe, such as those seen in this photo, may be mistaken for human bone. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Example of PVC pipe<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Is It Human?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Once it has been determined that an object is bone, the next logical step is to identify whether the bone belongs to a human or an animal. Forensic anthropologists are faced with this question in everyday practice because human versus nonhuman bone identification is one of the most frequent requests they receive from law enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">There are many different ways to distinguish human versus nonhuman bone. The morphology (the shape\/form) of human bone is a good place for students to start. Identifying the 206 bones in the adult human skeleton and each bone\u2019s distinguishing features (muscle attachment sites, openings and grooves for nerves and blood vessels, etc.) is fundamental to skeletal analysis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Nevertheless, there are many animal bones and human bones that look similar. For example, the declawed skeleton of a bear paw looks a lot like a human hand, pig molars appear similar to human molars, and some smaller animal bones might be mistaken for those of an infant. To add to the confusion, fragmentary bone may be even more difficult to identify as human or nonhuman. However, several major differences between human and nonhuman vertebrate bone help distinguish the two.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Forensic anthropologists pay special attention to the density of the outer, compact layer of bone in both the cranium and in the long bones. Human cranial bone has three distinctive layers. The spongy bone is sandwiched between the outer (ectocranial) and inner (endocranial) compact layers. In most other mammals, the distinction between the spongy and compact layers is not always so definite. Secondly, the compact layer in nonhuman mammal long bones can be much thicker than observed in human bone. Due to the increased density of the compact layer, nonhuman bone tends to be heavier than human bone (Figure 16.6).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 399px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image11-2.png\" alt=\"Ring-like cross section of bone.\" width=\"399\" height=\"266\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.6: The compact layer of this animal bone is very thick, with almost no spongy bone visible. Compare with Figure 16.2 to visualize the difference in structure between human and nonhuman bone. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Animal bone cross section (Figure 15.6)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The size of a bone can also help determine whether it belongs to a human. Adult human bones are larger than subadult or infant bones. However, another major difference between human adult bones and those of a young individual or infant human can be attributed to development and growth of the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1222\">epiphyses<\/a><\/strong> (ends of the bone). The epiphyses of human subadult bones are not fused to the shaft (Figure 16.7). Therefore, if a bone is small and it is suspected to belong to a human subadult or infant, the epiphyses would not be fused. Many small animal bones appear very similar in form compared to adult human bones, but they are much too small to belong to an adult human. Yet they can be eliminated as subadult or infant bones if the epiphyses are fused to the shaft.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 288px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image13-3.png\" alt=\"X-ray image of child\u2019s ankle.\" width=\"288\" height=\"412\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.7: An x-ray of a subadult\u2019s ankle with the epiphyses of the tibia and fibula visible. The gap between the shaft of the bone and the end of the bone (epiphysis) is the location of the growth plate. Therefore, the growth plate gap is what separates the shafts from the epiphyses in the image. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tib_fib_growth_plates.jpg\">Tib fib growth plates<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/User:Gilo1969\">Gilo1969<\/a> at <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/\">English Wikipedia<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Is It Modern or Archaeological? <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Forensic anthropologists work with modern cases that fall within the scope of law enforcement investigations. Accordingly, it is important to determine whether discovered human remains are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1224\">archaeological<\/a> <\/strong>or forensic in nature. Human remains that are historic are considered archeaological. The scientific study of human remains from archaeological sites is called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1226\">bioarchaeology<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Dig Deeper: Bioarchaeology<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For readers who are interested in the sister subfield of bioarchaeology, which studies human remains and material culture from the past, please refer to chapter 8 of <em>Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Human Behaviour from Skeletal Remains,<\/em> in <em>TRACES: An Open Invitation to Archaeology<\/em> (Blatt, Michael, and Bright forthcoming).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>A forensic anthropologist should begin their analysis by reviewing the context in which the remains were discovered. This will help them understand a great deal about the remains, including determining whether they are archaeological or forensic in nature as well as considering legal and ethical issues associated with the collection, analysis, and storage of human remains (see \u201cEthics and Human Rights\u201d section of this chapter for more information).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 403px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image10-3.png\" alt=\"Four teeth in a person\u2019s mouth. First molar with silver filling.\" width=\"403\" height=\"303\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.8: A human tooth with a filling. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Filling.jpg#filehistory\">Filling<\/a> by Kauzio has been designated to the <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/public-domain\/cc0\/\">public domain (CC0)<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The \u201ccontext\u201d refers to the relationship the remains have to the immediate area in which they were found. This includes the specific place where the remains were found, the soil or other organic matter immediately surrounding the remains, and any other objects or artifacts in close proximity to the body. For example, imagine that a set of remains has been located during a house renovation. The remains are discovered below the foundation. Do the remains belong to a murder victim? Or was the house built on top of an ancient burial ground? Observing information from the surroundings can help determine whether the remains are archaeological or modern. How long ago was the foundation of the house erected? Are there artifacts in close proximity to the body, such as clothing or stone tools? These are questions about the surroundings that will help determine the relative age of the remains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Clues directly from the skeleton may also indicate whether the remains are archaeological or modern. For example, tooth fillings can suggest that the individual was alive recently (Figure 16.8). In fact, filling material has changed over the decades, so the specific type of material used to fix a cavity can be matched with specific time periods. Gold was used in dental work in the past, but more recently composite (a mixture of plastic and fine glass) fillings have become more common.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>How <\/strong><strong>Many Individuals Are Present?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>What Is MNI?<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another assessment that an anthropologist can perform is the calculation of the number of individuals in a mixed burial assemblage. Because not all burials consist of a single individual, it is important to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1268\">burial assemblage<\/a><\/strong> be able to estimate the number of individuals in a forensic context. Quantification of the number of individuals in a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1524\">burial assemblage<\/a><\/strong> can be done through the application of a number of methods, including the following: the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), the Most Likely Number of Individuals (MLNI), and the Lincoln Index (LI). The most commonly used method in biological anthropology, and the focus of this section, is determination of the MNI.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The MNI presents \u201cthe minimum estimate for the number of individuals that contributed to the sample\u201d (Adams and Konigsberg 2008, 243). Many methods of calculating MNI were originally developed within the field of zooarchaeology for use on calculating the number of individuals in faunal or animal assemblages (Adams and Konigsberg 2008, 241). What MNI calculations provide is a lowest possible count for the total number of individuals contributing to a skeletal assemblage. Traditional methods of calculating MNI include separating a skeletal assemblage into categories according to the individual bone and the side the bone comes from and then taking the highest count per category and assigning that as the minimum number (Figure 16.9).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 664px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image28-3.png\" alt=\"Many bone portions laying on individual plastic bags on a table.\" width=\"664\" height=\"441\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.9: Skeletal elements from a commingled faunal assemblage. Credit: Commingled animal remains from Eden-Farson Pre-Contact site in southwest Wyoming by Matt O\u2019Brien original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.) is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Why Calculate MNI?<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In a forensic context, the determination of MNI is most applicable in cases of mass graves, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1232\">commingled burials<\/a><\/strong>, and mass fatality incidents. The term <em>commingled<\/em> is applied to any burial assemblage in which individual skeletons are not separated into separate burials. As an example, the authors of this chapter have observed commingling of remains resulting from mass fatality wildfire events. Commingled remains may also be encountered in events such as a plane or vehicle crash. It is important to remember that in any forensic context, MNI should be referenced and an MNI of one should be substantiated by the fact that there was no repetition of elements associated with the case.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Constructing the Biological Profile<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Who Is It?<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">\u201cWho is it?\u201d is one of the first questions that law enforcement officers ask when they are faced with a set of skeletal remains. To answer this question, forensic anthropologists construct a biological profile (White and Folkens 2005, 405). A <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1228\">biological profile<\/a> <\/strong>is an individual\u2019s identifying characteristics, or biological information, which include the following: biological sex, age at death, stature, population affinity, skeletal variation, and evidence of trauma and pathology.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Assessing Biological Sex <\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Assessment of biological sex is often one of the first things considered when establishing a biological profile because several other parts, such as age and stature estimations, rely on an assessment of biological sex to make the calculations more accurate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Assessment of biological sex focuses on differences in both morphological (form or structure) and metric (measured) traits in individuals. When assessing morphological traits, the skull and the pelvis are the most commonly referenced areas of the skeleton. These differences are related to sexual dimorphism usually varying in the amount of robusticity seen between males and females. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1230\">Robusticity<\/a> <\/strong>deals with strength and size; it is frequently used as a term to describe a large size or thickness. In general, males will show a greater degree of robusticity than females. For example, the length and width of the mastoid process, a bony projection located behind the opening for the ear, is typically larger in males. The mastoid process is an attachment point for muscles of the neck, and this bony projection tends to be wider and longer in males. In general, cranial features tend to be more robust in males (Figure 16.10).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 601px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image26-3.png\" alt=\"Front and side images of a male (left) and female (right) cranium.\" width=\"601\" height=\"632\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.10: Anterior and lateral view of a male and female cranium. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Anterior and lateral view of a male and female cranium (Figure 15.10)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropo logy<\/a> by Ashley Kendell is a collective work under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Includes <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/modern-human-asian-female-skull-BC-149\/category\/all-human-skulls\/human-anatomy\">Human Female Asian Skull<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/human-asian-male-skull-BC-016\/category\/all-human-skulls\/human-anatomy\">Human Male Asian Skull<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a>, used by permission.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">When considering the pelvis, the features associated with the ability to give birth help distinguish females from males. During puberty, estrogen causes a widening of the female pelvis to allow for the passage of a baby. Several studies have identified specific features or bony landmarks associated with the widening of the hips, and this section will discuss one such method. The Phenice Method (Phenice 1969) is traditionally the most common reference used to assess morphological characteristics associated with sex. The Phenice Method specifically looks at the presence or absence of (1) a ventral arc, (2) the presence or absence of a subpubic concavity, and (3) the width of the medial aspect of the ischiopubic ramus (Figure 16.11). When present, the ventral arc, a ridge of bone located on the ventral surface of the pubic bone, is indicative of female remains. Likewise the presence of a subpubic concavity and a narrow medial aspect of the ischiopubic ramus is associated with a female sex estimation. Assessments of these features, as well as those of the skull (when both the pelvis and skull are present), are combined for an overall estimation of sex.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 1603px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image29-3.png\" alt=\"Male and female os coxae (anterior portions).\" width=\"1603\" height=\"582\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.11: Features associated with the Phenice Method. Images derived from CSU-HIL donated skeletal collection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Features associated with the Phenice Method (Figure 15.11)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Colleen Milligan is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Metric analyses are also used in the estimation of sex. Measurements taken from every region of the body can contribute to estimating sex through statistical approaches that assign a predictive value of sex. These approaches can include multiple measurements from several skeletal elements in what is called multivariate (multiple variables) statistics. Other approaches consider a single measurement, such as the diameter of the head of the femur, of a specific element in a univariate (single variable) analysis (Berg 2017, 152\u2013156).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">It is important to note that, although forensic anthropologists usually begin assessment of biological profile with biological sex, there is one major instance in which this is not appropriate. The case of two individuals found in California, on July 8, 1979, is one example that demonstrates the effect age has on the estimation of sex. The identities of the two individuals were unknown; therefore, law enforcement sent them to a lab for identification. A skeletal analysis determined that the remains represented one adolescent male and one adolescent female, both younger than 18 years of age. This information did not match with any known missing children at the time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In 2015, the cold case was reanalyzed, and DNA samples were extracted. The results indicated that the remains were actually those of two girls who went missing in 1978. The girls were 15 years old and 14 years old at the time of death. It is clear that the 1979 results were incorrect, but this mistake also provides the opportunity to discuss the limitations of assessing sex from a subadult skeleton.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Assessing sex from the human skeleton is based on biological and genetic traits associated with females and males. These traits are linked to differences in sexual dimorphism and reproductive characteristics between females and males. The link to reproductive characteristics means that most indicators of biological sex do not fully manifest in prepubescent individuals, making estimations of sex unreliable in younger individuals (SWGANTH 2010b). This was the case in the example of the 14-year-old girl. When examined in 1979, her remains were misidentified as male because she had not yet fully developed female pelvic traits.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Sex vs. Gender<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Biological sex is a different concept than <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1234\">gender<\/a><\/strong>. While biological anthropologists can estimate sex from the skeleton, estimating an individual\u2019s gender would require a greater context because gender is defined culturally rather than biologically. Take, for example, an individual who identifies as transgender. This individual has a gender identity that is different from their biological sex. The gender identity of any individual depends on factors related to self-identification, situation or context, and cultural factors. While in the U.S. we have historically thought of sex and gender as binary concepts (male or female), many cultures throughout the world recognize several possible gender identities. In this sense, gender is seen as a continuous or fluid variable rather than a fixed one.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Historically, forensic anthropologists have used a binary construct to categorize human skeletal remains as either male or female (with the accompanying categories of probable male, probable female, and indeterminate). In the case of transgender and gender nonconforming individuals, the binary approach to sex assessment may delay or hinder identification efforts (Buchanan 2014; Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020; Tallman, Kincer, and Plemons 2021). As such, many forensic anthropologists have begun to address the inherent problems associated with a binary approach to sex identification and to explore ways of assessing social identity and self-identified gender using skeletal remains and forensic context.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For the duration of this section, the term <em>transgender<\/em> refers to individuals whose gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth (Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020:2). Transgender individuals transition from one gender binary to another, such as male-to-female (MTF) or female-to-male (FTM). While many of the gender-affirming procedures available to trans and gender-nonconforming individuals are focused on soft tissue modifications (e.g., breast augmentation, genital reconstruction, hormone therapies, etc.), there are a number of gender-affirmation surgeries that do leave a permanent record on the skeleton. Generally speaking, FTM transgender people are reported to undergo fewer surgical procedures than do MTF transgender people (Buchanan 2014). The discussion below focuses on Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS), which leaves a permanent record on the human skeleton that may be used to help make an identification.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">FFS refers to a combination of procedures focused on sexually dimorphic features of the face, with the intent of transforming typically male facial features into more feminine forms. Facial Feminization Surgery procedures were developed by Dr. Douglas Ousterhout, a San Francisco based cranio-maxillofacial surgeon, in the mid-1980s (Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020:2). FFS can include one or a combination of the following: hairline lowering, forehead reduction and contouring, brow lift, reduction rhinoplasty, cheek enhancement, lip lift, lip filling, chin contouring, jaw contouring, and\/or tracheal shave (Buchanan 2014; Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020:2). Of the procedures outlined previously, four are known to directly affect the facial skeleton: forehead contouring, rhinoplasty, chin contouring, and jaw contouring (Buchanan 2014; Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020:2).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Because FFS procedures have been widely documented in the medical (and more recently the forensic anthropological) literature, there are a number of indicators that a forensic anthropologist can use to make more informed evaluations of gender, including evidence of bone remodeling in sexually dimorphic regions of the skull (e.g., forehead, chin, jawline), as well as the presence of plates, pins, or other surgical hardware that may be evidence of FFS (Buchanan 2014; Schall, Rogers, and Deschamps-Braly 2020; Tallman, Kincer, and Plemons 2021). Additionally, some forensic anthropologists suggest cautiously integrating contextual information from the scene, such as personal effects, material evidence, and recovery scene information, into their evaluation of an individual\u2019s social identity (Beatrice and Soler 2016; Birkby, Fenton, and Anderson 2008; Soler and Beatrice 2018; Soler Et al. 2019; Tallman, Kincer, and Plemons 2021; Winburn, Schoff, and Warren 2016). The ultimate goal of many skeletal analyses is to make a positive identification on a set of unidentified remains.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Assessment <\/em><em>of Population Affinity<\/em><\/h4>\n<p>In an effort to combat the erroneous assumptions tied to the race concept, forensic anthropologists have attempted to reframe this component of the biological profile. The term <em>race<\/em> is no longer used in casework and teaching. Historically, the word <em>ancestry<\/em> is and was deemed a more appropriate way to describe an individual\u2019s phenotype. However, in more recent years, forensic anthropologists have begun using the term <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1236\">population affinity<\/a><\/strong><em>, <\/em>recognizing that we are basing our analysis on the similarities we see based on the reference samples we have available (Winburn and Algee-Hewitt 2021). An important note here is that it is possible to hinder identifications and harm individuals when tools like estimations of population affinity are misapplied, misinterpreted, or misused. For this reason, the field of forensic anthropology has ongoing conversations about the appropriateness of this analysis in the biological profile (Bethard and DiGangi 2020; Stull Et al. 2021).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">We use the term <em>population affinity<\/em> to refer to the variation seen among modern populations\u2014variation that is both genetic and environmentally driven. The word <em>affinity<\/em> refers to similarities or relationships between individuals. As forensic anthropologists, we compare an unknown individual to multiple reference groups and look for the degree of similarity in observable traits with those groups. As noted previously, population affinity can aid law enforcement in their identification of missing persons or unknown skeletal remains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Within the field of anthropology, the estimation of population affinity has a contentious history, and early attempts at classification were largely based on the erroneous assumption that an individual\u2019s <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1238\">phenotype <\/a><\/strong> (outward appearance) was correlated with their innate intelligence and abilities (see Chapter 14 for a more in-depth discussion of the history of the race concept). The use of the term <em>race<\/em> is deeply embedded in the social context of the United States. In any other organism\/living thing, groups divided according to the biological race concept would be defined as a separate subspecies. The major issue with applying the biological race concept to humans is that there are not enough differences between any two populations to separate on a genetic basis. In other words, <em>biological races do not exist in human populations. <\/em>However, the concept of race has been perpetuated and upheld by sociocultural constructs of race.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The conundrum for forensic anthropologists is the fact that while races do not exist on a biological level, we still socially recognize and categorize individuals based on their phenotype. Clearly, our phenotype is an important factor in not only how we are viewed by others but also how we identify ourselves. It is also a commonly reported variable. Often labeled as \u201crace,\u201d we are asked to report how we self-identify on school applications, government identification, surveys, census reports, and so forth. It follows then that when a person is reported missing, the information commonly collected by law enforcement and sometimes entered into a missing person\u2019s database includes their age, biological sex, stature, and \u201crace.\u201d Therefore, the more information a forensic anthropologist can provide regarding the individual\u2019s physical characteristics, the more he or she can help to narrow the search.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">As an exercise, create a list of all of the women you know who are between the ages of 18 and 24 and approximately 5\u2019 4\u201d to 5\u2019 9\u201d tall. You probably have several dozen people on the list. Now, consider how many females you know who are between the ages of 18 and 24, are approximately 5\u2019 4\u201d to 5\u2019 9\u201d tall, and are Vietnamese. Your list is going to be significantly shorter. That\u2019s how missing persons searches go as well. The more information you can provide regarding a decedent\u2019s phenotype, the fewer possible matches law enforcement are left to investigate. This is why population affinity has historically been included as a part of the biological profile.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Traditionally, population affinity was accomplished through a visual inspection of morphological variants of the skull (morphoscopics). These methods focused on elements of the facial skeleton, including the nose, eyes, and cheek bones. However, in an effort to reduce subjectivity, nonmetric cranial traits are now assessed within a statistical framework to help anthropologists better interpret their distribution among living populations (Hefner and Linde 2018). Based on the observable traits, a macromorphoscopic analysis will allow the practitioner to create a statistical prediction of geographic origin. In essence, forensic anthropologists are using human variation in the estimation of geographic origin, by referencing documented frequencies of nonmetric skeletal indicators or macromorphoscopic traits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Population affinity is also assessed through metric analyses. The computer program Fordisc is an anthropological tool used to estimate different components of the biological profile, including ancestry, sex, and stature. When using Fordisc, skeletal measurements are input into the computer software, and the program employs multivariate statistical classification methods, including discriminant function analysis, to generate a statistical prediction for the geographic origin of unknown remains based on the comparison of the unknown to the reference samples in the software program. Fordisc also calculates the likelihood of the prediction being correct, as well as how typical the metric data is for the assigned group.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Estimating Age-at-Death<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Estimating age-at-death from the skeleton relies on the measurement of two basic physiological processes: (1) growth and development and (2) degeneration (or aging). From fetal development on, our bones and teeth grow and change at a predictable rate. This provides for relatively accurate age estimates. After our bones and teeth cease to grow and develop, they begin to undergo structural changes, or degeneration, associated with aging. This does not happen at such predictable rates and, therefore, results in less accurate or larger age-range estimations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">During growth and development stages, two primary methods used for estimations of age of subadults (those under the age of 18) are <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1240\">epiphyseal union<\/a><\/strong> and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1244\">dental development.<\/a><\/strong> Epiphyseal union<strong> (<\/strong>or <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1242\">epiphyseal fusion<\/a><\/strong>) refers to the appearance and closure of the epiphyseal plates between the primary centers of growth in a bone and the subsequent centers of growth (see Figure 16.7). Prior to complete union, the cartilaginous area between the primary and secondary centers of growth is also referred to as the growth plates (Schaefer, Black, and Scheuer 2009). Different areas of the skeleton have documented differences in the appearance and closure of epiphyses, making this a reliable method for aging subadult remains (SWGANTH 2013).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">As an example of its utility in the identification process, epiphyseal development was used to identify two subadult victims of a fatal fire in Flint, Michigan, in February 2010. The remains represented two young girls, ages three and four. Due to the intensity of the fire, the subadult victims were differentiated from each other through the appearance of the patella, the kneecap. The patella is a bone that develops within the tendon of the quadriceps muscle at the knee joint. The patella begins to form around three to four years of age (Cunningham, Scheuer, and Black 2016, 407\u2013409). In the example above, radiographs of the knees showed the presence of a patella in the four-year-old girl and the absence of a clearly discernible patella in the three-year-old.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 358px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image18-2.png\" alt=\"Cranial cast of child with exposed maxilla and mandible to see developing dentition.\" width=\"358\" height=\"358\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.12: Dental development in a subadult. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/5-year-old-human-child-skull-with-mixed-dentition-exposed-BC-189\">5-year-old Human Child Skull with Mixed Dentition Exposed<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Dental development begins during fetal stages of growth and continues until the complete formation and eruption of the adult third molars (if present). The first set of teeth to appear are called deciduous or baby teeth. Individuals develop a total of 20 deciduous teeth, including incisors, canines, and molars. These are generally replaced by adult dentition as an individual grows (Figure 16.12). A total of 32 teeth are represented in the adult dental arcade, including incisors, canines, premolars, and molars. When dental development is used for age estimations, researchers use both tooth-formation patterns and eruption schedules as determining evidence. For example, the crown of the tooth forms first followed by the formation of the tooth root. During development, an individual can exhibit a partially formed crown or a complete crown with a partially formed root. The teeth generally begin the eruption process once the crown of the tooth is complete. The developmental stages of dentition are one of the most reliable and consistent aging methods for subadults (Langley, Gooding, and Tersigni-Tarrant 2017, 176\u2013177).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 403px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image22-3.png\" alt=\"Surfaces of three pubic symphyses: billowy (A) to more flat (B) to rough (C).\" width=\"403\" height=\"224\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.13: Examples of degenerative changes to the pubic symphysis: (A) young adult; (B) middle adult; (C) old adult. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Example of the progression of degenerative changes to the pubic symphysis (Figure 15.14)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropo logy<\/a> by Ashley Kendell is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License<\/a>. [Original photos by Dr. Julie Fleischman used by permission. Pubic symphyses are curated in the Hartnett-Fulginiti donated skeletal collection. Donation and research consent was provided by next of kin.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Degenerative changes in the skeleton typically begin after 18 years of age, with more prominent changes developing after an individual reaches middle adulthood (commonly defined as after 35 years of age in osteology). These changes are most easily seen around joint surfaces of the pelvis, the cranial vault, and the ribs. In this chapter, we focus on the pubic symphysis surfaces of the pelvis and the sternal ends of the ribs, which show metamorphic changes from young adulthood to older adulthood. The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1262\">pubic symphysis<\/a> <\/strong>is a joint that unites the left and right halves of the pelvis. The surface of the pubic symphysis changes during adulthood, beginning as a surface with pronounced ridges (called billowing) and flattening with a more distinct rim to the pubic symphysis as an individual ages. As with all metamorphic age changes, older adults tend to develop lipping around the joint surfaces as well as a breakdown of the joint surfaces. The most commonly used method for aging adult skeletons from the pubic symphysis is the Suchey-Brooks method (Brooks and Suchey 1990; Katz and Suchey 1986). This method divides the changes seen with the pubic symphysis into six phases based on macroscopic age-related changes to the surface. Figure 16.13 provides a visual of the degenerative changes that typically occur on the pubic symphysis.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 403px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image12-3.png\" alt=\"Three sternal rib ends demonstrating progressive changes that occur with age.\" width=\"403\" height=\"220\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.14: Examples of degenerative changes to the sternal rib end: (A) young adult; (B) middle adult; (C) old adult. Images derived from CSU, Chico HIL donated skeletal collection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Examples of degenerative changes to the sternal rib end (Figure 15.15)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The sternal end of the ribs, the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1246\">anterior <\/a><\/strong> end of the rib that connects via cartilage to the sternum, is also used in age estimations of adults. This method, first developed by M. Y. \u0130\u015fcan and colleagues, considers both the change in shape of the sternal end as well as the quality of the bone (\u0130\u015fcan, Loth, and Wright 1984; \u0130\u015fcan, Loth, and Wright 1985). The sternal end first develops a billowing appearance in young adulthood. The bone typically develops a wider and deeper cupped end as an individual ages. Older adults tend to exhibit bony extensions of the sternal end rim as attaching cartilage ossifies. Figure 16.14 provides a visual of the degenerative changes that typically occur in sternal rib ends.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Estimating Stature<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Stature, or height, is one of the most prominently recorded components of the biological profile. Our height is recorded from infancy through adulthood. Doctor\u2019s appointments, driver's license applications, and sports rosters all typically involve a measure of stature for an individual. As such, it is also a component of the biological profile nearly every individual will have on record. Bioarchaeologists and forensic anthropologists use stature estimation methods to provide a range within which an individual\u2019s biological height would fall. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1248\">Biological height<\/a> <\/strong>is a person\u2019s true anatomical height. However, the range created through these estimations is often compared to <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1264\">reported stature<\/a><\/strong>, which is typically self-reported and based on an approximation of an individual\u2019s true height (Ousley 1995).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In June 2015, two men were shot and killed in Granite Bay, California, in a double homicide. Investigators were able to locate surveillance camera footage from a gas station where the two victims were spotted in a car with another individual believed to be the perpetrator in the case. The suspect, sitting behind the victims in the car, hung his right arm out of the window as the car drove away. The search for the perpetrator was eventually narrowed down to two suspects. One suspect was 5\u2019 8\u201d while the other suspect was 6\u2019 4\u201d, representing almost a foot difference in height reported stature between the two. Forensic anthropologists were given the dimensions of the car (for proportionality of the arm) and were asked to calculate the stature of the suspect in the car from measurements of the suspect\u2019s forearm hanging from the window. Approximate lengths of the bones of the forearm were established from the video footage and used to create a predicted stature range. Stature estimations from skeletal remains typically look at the correlation between the measurements of any individual bone and the overall measurement of body height. In the case above, the length of the right forearm pointed to the taller of the two suspects who was subsequently arrested for the homicide.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Certain bones, such as the long bones of the leg, contribute more to our overall height than others and can be used with mathematical equations known as regression equations. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1252\">Regression methods <\/a> <\/strong>examine the relationship between variables such as height and bone length and use the correlation between the variables to create a prediction interval (or range) for estimated stature. This method for calculating stature is the most commonly used method (SWGANTH 2012). Figure 16.15 shows the measurement of the bicondylar length of the femur for stature estimations.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 584px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image2-3.png\" alt=\"A femur is measured using a wooden osteometric board.\" width=\"584\" height=\"389\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.15: Image of measurement of the bicondylar length of the femur, often used in the estimation of living stature. Image derived from CSU, Chico HIL donated skeletal collection. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Measurement of the bicondylar length of the femur<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Identification Using Individualizing Characteristics<\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">One of the most frequently requested analyses within the forensic anthropology laboratory is assistance with the identification of unidentified remains. While all components of a biological profile, as discussed above, can assist law enforcement officers and medical examiners to narrow down the list of potential identifications, a biological profile will not lead to a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1254\">positive identification<\/a><\/strong>. The term <em>positive identification<\/em> refers to a scientifically validated method of identifying previously unidentified remains. Presumptive identifications, however, are not scientifically validated; rather, they are based on circumstances or scene context. For example, if a decedent is found in a locked home with no evidence of forced entry but the body is no longer visually identifiable, it may be presumed that the remains belong to the homeowner. Hence, a presumptive identification.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">The medicolegal system ultimately requires that a positive identification be made in such circumstances, and a presumptive identification is often a good way to narrow down the pool of possibilities. Biological profile information also assists with making a presumptive identification based on an individual\u2019s phenotype in life (e.g., what they looked like). As an example, a forensic anthropologist may establish the following components of a biological profile: white male, between the ages of 35 and 50, approximately 5\u2019 7\u201d to 5\u2019 11.\u201d While this seems like a rather specific description of an individual, you can imagine that this description fits dozens, if not hundreds, of people in an urban area. Therefore, law enforcement can use the biological profile information to narrow their pool of possible identifications to include only white males who fit the age and height outlined above. Once a possible match is found, the decedent can be identified using a method of positive identification.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Positive identifications are based on what we refer to as individualizing traits or characteristics, which are traits that are unique at the individual level. For example, brown hair is not an individualizing trait as brown is the most common hair colour in the U.S. But, a specific pattern of dental restorations or surgical implants can be individualizing, because it is unlikely that you will have an exact match on either of these traits when comparing two individuals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">A number of positive methods are available to forensic anthropologists, and for the remainder of this section we will discuss the following methods: comparative medical and dental radiography and identification of surgical implants.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 165px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image17-3.png\" alt=\"Radiograph of skull with frontal sinuses visible.\" width=\"165\" height=\"182\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.16: Example of the unique shape of the frontal sinus. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Frontal_bone_sinuses.jpg\">Frontal bone sinuses<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Alex_Khimich\">Alex Khimich<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Comparative medical and dental radiography is used to find consistency of traits when comparing antemortem records (medical and dental records taken during life) with images taken postmortem (after death). Comparative medical radiography focuses primarily on features associated with the skeletal system, including trabecular pattern (internal structure of bone that is honeycomb in appearance), bone shape or cortical density (compact outer layer of bone), and evidence of past trauma, skeletal pathology, or skeletal anomalies. Other individualizing traits include the shape of various bones or their features, such as the frontal sinuses (Figure 16.16).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Comparative dental radiography focuses on the number, shape, location, and orientation of dentition and dental restorations in antemortem and postmortem images. While there is not a minimum number of matching traits that need to be identified for an identification to be made, the antemortem and postmortem records should have enough skeletal or dental consistencies to conclude that the records did in fact come from the same individual (SWGANTH 2010a). Consideration should also be given to population-level frequencies of specific skeletal and dental traits. If a trait is particularly common within a given population, it may not be a good trait to utilize for positive identification.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 354px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image16-3.png\" alt=\"A scapula and humerus with a metal shoulder replacement.\" width=\"354\" height=\"231\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.17: Image of joint replacement in the right shoulder. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/naturalhistory.si.edu\/education\/teaching-resources\/written-bone\/skeleton-keys\/todays-bones\">Shoulder replacement<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: Written in Bone, Today\u2019s Bones] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Surgical implants or devices can also be used for identification purposes (Figure 16.17). These implements are sometimes recovered with human remains. One of the ways forensic anthropologists can use surgical implants to assist in decedent identification is by providing a thorough analysis of the implant and noting any identifying information such as serial numbers, manufacturer symbols, and so forth. This information can then sometimes be tracked directly to the manufacturer or the place of surgical intervention, which may be used to identify unknown remains (SWGANTH 2010a).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Trans Doe Task Force<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The Trans Doe Task Force (TDTF) is a Trans-led nonprofit organization that investigates cases involving LGBTQ+ missing and murdered persons. The organization specifically focuses on transgender and gender-variant cases, providing connections between law enforcement agencies, medical examiner offices, forensic anthropologists, and forensic genetic genealogists to increase the chances of identification. Additionally, the TDTF curates a data repository of missing, murdered, and unclaimed LGBTQ+ individuals, and they continuously try innovative approaches to identify these individuals, whose lived gender identity may not match their biological sex.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">For more information visit <a href=\"https:\/\/transdoetaskforce.org\/\">transdoetaskforce.org<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Trauma Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em>Types of Trauma<\/em><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Within the field of anthropology, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1256\">trauma<\/a> <\/strong>is defined as an injury to living tissue caused by an extrinsic force or mechanism (Lovell 1997:139). Forensic anthropologists can assist a forensic pathologist by providing an interpretation of the course of events that led to skeletal trauma. Typically, traumatic injury to bone is classified into one of four categories, defined by the trauma mechanism. A trauma mechanism refers to the force that produced the skeletal modification and can be classified as (1) sharp force, (2) blunt force, (3) projectile, or (4) thermal (burning). Each type of trauma, and the characteristic pattern(s) associated with that particular categorization, will be discussed below.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">First, let\u2019s consider s<em>harp-force trauma<\/em>, which is caused by a tool that is edged, pointed, or beveled\u2014for example, a knife, saw, or machete (SWGANTH 2011). The patterns of injury resulting from sharp-force trauma include linear incisions created by a sharp, straight edge; punctures; and chop marks (Figure 16.18; SWGANTH 2011). When observed under a microscope, an anthropologist can often determine what kind of tool created the bone trauma. For example, a power saw cut will be discernible from a manual saw cut.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 602px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image21-1.png\" alt=\"Anterior image of a skull with multiple traumatic injuries to forehead.\" width=\"602\" height=\"457\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.18: Example of sharp-force trauma (sword wound) to the frontal bone. The skull appears sliced with thin lines in two places across the top of the skull. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/openverse.org\/image\/909d1b77-ad5f-4cda-be44-6d9b5fbf14b9\/\">Female skull injured by a medieval sword<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/sketchfab.com\/provinciaal_depot_noordholland\">Provinciaal depot voor archeologie Noord-Holland<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 4.0 License<\/a>. The original image is a 3D model that can be manipulated on the <a href=\"https:\/\/wordpress.org\/openverse\/image\/909d1b77-ad5f-4cda-be44-6d9b5fbf14b9\/\">openverse website<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Second, <em>blunt-force trauma<\/em> is defined as \u201ca relatively low-velocity impact over a relatively large surface area\u201d (Galloway 1999, 5). Blunt-force injuries can result from impacts from clubs, sticks, fists, and so forth. Blunt-force impacts typically leave an injury at the point of impact but can also lead to bending and deformation in other regions of the bone. Depressions, fractures, and deformation at and around the site of impact are all characteristics of blunt-force trauma (Figure 16.19). As with sharp-force trauma, an anthropologist attempts to interpret blunt-force injuries, providing information pertaining to the type of tool used, the direction of impact, the sequence of impacts, if more than one, and the amount of force applied.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 578px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image30.png\" alt=\"Cranium with two blunt force impacts from a hammer.\" width=\"578\" height=\"803\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.19: Example of multiple blunt force impacts to the left parietal and frontal bones. There is one hole in the skull with fractured bone around the edges. There are also multiple spots across the back of the skull with depressions of various sizes. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Skull_hammer_trauma.jpg\">Skull hammer trauma<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nih.gov\/\">the National Institutes of Health<\/a>, Health &amp; Human Services, is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>. [Exhibit: Visible Proofs: Forensic Views of the Body, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 19th Century Collection, National Museum of Health and Medicine, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, D.C.]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Third, <em>projectile trauma<\/em> refers to high-velocity trauma, typically affecting a small surface area (Galloway 1999, 6). Projectile trauma results from fast-moving objects such as bullets or shrapnel. It is typically characterized by penetrating defects or embedded materials (Figure 16.20). When interpreting injuries resulting from projectile trauma, an anthropologist can often offer information pertaining to the type of weapon used (e.g., rifle vs. handgun), relative size of the bullet (but not the caliber of the bullet), the direction the projectile was traveling, and the sequence of injuries if there are multiple present.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 462px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image5-3.png\" alt=\"Anterior and posterior views of a skull with a gunshot wound.\" width=\"462\" height=\"291\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 16.20: Example of projectile trauma with an entrance wound to the frontal bone and exit wound visible on the occipital. A small circular hole is visible in the front of the skull with cracks radiating out from the point of impact. There is a larger hole visible in the back of the skull that is irregular yet circular in shape. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/naturalhistory.si.edu\/education\/teaching-resources\/written-bone\/skeleton-keys\/how-bone-biographies-get-written\">Trauma: Gunshot Wounds<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: Written in Bone, How Bone Biographies Get Written] <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\">is used for educational and non-commercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian.<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Finally, <em>thermal trauma<\/em> is a bone alteration that results from bone exposure to extreme heat. Thermal trauma can result in cases of house or car fires, intentional disposal of a body in cases of homicidal violence, plane crashes, and so on. Thermal trauma is most often characterized by colour changes to bone, ranging from yellow to black (charred) or white (calcined). Other bone alterations characteristic of thermal trauma include delamination (flaking or layering due to bone failure), shrinkage, fractures, and heat-specific burn patterning. When interpreting injuries resulting from thermal damage, an anthropologist can differentiate between thermal fractures and fractures that occurred before heat exposure, thereby contributing to the interpretation of burn patterning (e.g., was the individual bound or in a flexed position prior to the fire?).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">While there are characteristic patterns associated with the four categories of bone trauma, it is also important to note that these bone alterations do not always occur independently of different trauma types. An individual\u2019s skeleton may present with multiple different types of trauma, such as a projectile wound and thermal trauma. Therefore, it is important that the anthropologist recognize the different types of trauma and interpret them appropriately.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Timing of Injury<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Another important component of any anthropological trauma analysis is the determination of the timing of injury (e.g., when did the injury occur). Timing of injury is traditionally split into one of three categories: <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1260\">antemortem<\/a> <\/strong>(before death), <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1258\">perimortem<\/a> <\/strong>(at or around the time of death), and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1266\">postmortem <\/a><\/strong>(after death). This classification system differs slightly from the classification system used by the pathologist because it specifically references the qualities of bone tissue and bone response to external forces. Therefore, the perimortem interval (at or around the time of death) means that the bone is still fresh and has what is referred to as a green bone response, which can extend past death by several weeks or even months. For example, in cold or freezing temperatures a body can be preserved for extended periods of time, increasing the perimortem interval, while in desert climates decomposition is accelerated, thereby significantly decreasing the postmortem interval (Galloway 1999, 12). Antemortem injuries (occurring well before death and not related to the death incident) are typically characterized by some level of healing, in the form of a fracture callus or unification of fracture margins. Finally, postmortem injuries (occurring after death, while bone is no longer fresh) are characterized by jagged fracture margins, resulting from a loss of moisture content during the decomposition process (Galloway 1999, 16). In general, all bone traumas should be classified according to the timing of injury, if possible. This information will help the medical examiner or pathologist better understand the circumstances surrounding the decedent\u2019s death, as well as events occurring during life and after the final disposition of the body.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>The Role of the Forensic Anthropologist in Trauma Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Within the medicolegal system, forensic anthropologists are often called upon by the medical examiner, forensic pathologist, or coroner to assist with an interpretation of trauma. The forensic anthropologist\u2019s main focus in any trauma analysis is the underlying skeletal system\u2014as well as, sometimes, cartilage. Analysis and interpretation of soft tissue injuries fall within the purview of the medical examiner or pathologist. It is also important to note that the main role of the forensic anthropologist is to provide information pertaining to skeletal injury to assist the medical examiner\/pathologist in their final interpretation of injury. Forensic anthropologists do not hypothesize as to the cause of death of an individual. Instead, a forensic anthropologist\u2019s report should include a description of the injury (e.g., trauma mechanism, number of injuries, location, timing of injury); documentation of the injury, which may be utilized in court testimony (e.g., photographs, radiographs, measurements); and, if applicable, a statement as to the condition of the body and state of decomposition, which may be useful for understanding the depositional context (e.g., how long has the body been exposed to the elements; was it moved or in its original location; are any of the alterations to bone due to environmental or faunal exposure instead of intentional human modification).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Taphonomy<\/h2>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>What Happened to the Remains After Death?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The majority of the skeletal analysis process revolves around the identity of the deceased individual. However, there is one last, very important question that forensic anthropologists should ask: What happened to the remains after death? Generally speaking, processes that alter the bone after death are referred to as taphonomic changes (refer to Chapter 8 for a discussion regarding taphonomy and the fossil record).<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The term <em>taphonomy<\/em> was originally used to refer to the processes through which organic remains mineralize, also known as fossilization. Within the context of biological anthropology, the term <em>taphonomy<\/em> is better defined as the study of what happens to human remains after death (Komar and Buikstra 2008). Initial factors affecting a body after death include processes such as decomposition and scavenging by animals. However, taphonomic processes encompass much more than the initial period after death. For example, plant root growth can leach minerals from bone, leaving a distinctive mark. Sunlight can bleach human remains, leaving exposed areas whiter than those that remained buried. Water can wear the surface of the bone until it becomes smooth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Some taphonomic processes can help a forensic anthropologist estimate the relative amount of time that human remains have been exposed to the elements. For example, root growth through a bone would certainly indicate a body was buried for more than a few days. Forensic anthropologists must be very careful when attempting to estimate time since death based on taphonomic processes because environmental conditions can greatly influence the rate at which taphonomic processes progress. For example, in cold environments, tissue may decay slower than in warm, moist environments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Forensic anthropologists must contend with taphonomic processes that affect the preservation of bones. For example, high acidity in the soil can break down human bone to the point of crumbling. In addition, when noting trauma, they must be very careful not to confuse postmortem (after death) bone damage with trauma.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\" style=\"width: 470.25pt\">\n<caption>Figure 16.21: Table showing taphonomic processes that affect the preservation of bones. A. Rodent gnawing. B. Carnivore damage. C. Burned bone. D. Root etching. E. Weathering. F. Cut marks. Credit: A. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Rodent gnawing (Figure 15.26)<\/a>, B. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Carnivore damage (Figure 15.27)<\/a>, C. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Burned bone (Figure 15.28)<\/a>, D. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Root etching (Figure 15.29)<\/a>, E. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Weathering (Figure 15.30)<\/a>, and F. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/__unknown__-5\/\">Cut marks (Figure 15.30)<\/a>, all original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Alex Perrone are under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 52.5pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Taphonomic Process<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 1pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\">Definition<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 190.5pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Rodent Gnawing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image19-2.png\" alt=\"Parallel tooth marks etched by a rodent\u2019s front teeth visible on the end of an animal bone.\" width=\"564\" height=\"422\" \/><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">When rodents, such as rats and mice, chew on bone, they leave sets of parallel grooves. The shallow grooves are etched by the rodent\u2019s incisors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 166.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Carnivore Damage<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image23-4.png\" alt=\"Pit marks from the canines of a carnivore visible on the surface of an animal bone.\" width=\"410\" height=\"272\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Carnivores may leave destructive dental marks on bone. The tooth marks may be visible as pit marks or punctures from the canines, as well as extensive gnawing or chewing of the ends of the bones to retrieve marrow.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 177pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Burned Bone<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image20-5.png\" alt=\"Burned animal bone fragments pictured at different stages of thermal damage.\" width=\"512\" height=\"342\" \/><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Fire causes observable damage to bone. Temperature and the amount of time bone is heated affect the appearance of the bone. Very high temperatures can crack bone and result in white colouration. Colour gradients are visible in between high and lower temperatures, with lower temperatures resulting in black colouration from charring. Cracking can also reveal information about the directionality of the burn.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 169.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Root Etching<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center\"><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image15-4.png\" alt=\"Animal bone with prominent, discolored grooves where roots leached nutrients from bone\u2019s surface.\" width=\"512\" height=\"342\" \/><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Plant roots can etch the outer surface of bone, leaving grooves where the roots attached as they leached nutrients. During this process, the plant\u2019s roots secrete acid that breaks down the surface of the bone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 170.5pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Weathering<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image9.png\" alt=\"Cracking and exfoliation of the surface of an animal bone. \" width=\"512\" height=\"342\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Many different environmental conditions affect bone. River transport can smooth the surface of the bone due to water abrasion. Sunlight can bleach the exposed surface of bone. Dry and wet environments or the mixture of both types of environments can cause cracking and exfoliation of the surface. Burial in different types of soil can cause discolouration, and exposure can cause degreasing.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table1-R\" style=\"height: 169.75pt\">\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 1pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;margin-left: 36pt\"><strong>Cut Marks<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: left\"><img class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/57\/2023\/08\/image8-2.png\" alt=\"Thin vertical lines and cuts are visible along the bone.\" width=\"512\" height=\"342\" \/><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table1-C\" style=\"border-top: solid #000000 0.75pt;border-right: solid #000000 1pt;border-bottom: solid #000000 1pt;border-left: solid #000000 0.75pt;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Humans may alter bone by cutting, scraping, or sawing it directly or in the process of removing tissue. The groove pattern\u2014that is, the depth and width of the cuts\u2014can help identify the tool used in the cutting process.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Dig Deeper: Modern Forensic Technologies<\/h2>\n<p>In recent years, the forensics community has greatly benefited from the introduction of new technologies, helping strengthen the precision and speed of discoveries and advancements in the field. With recent developments in forensic anthropology, such as 3D scanning technologies, virtual reconstruction, and AI-assisted DNA analysis being integrated into traditional methods, there have been notable changes in how experts investigate human remains.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artificial intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In recent years, Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown itself to be a valuable tool within forensic anthropology. Aiding forensic experts and toxicologists with complex tasks, the limitations of traditional autopsies can be addressed with the help of AI. By automating and enhancing key investigative processes such as searching for microscopic changes in the human body to determine the cause of death or a person\u2019s life conditions, AI has the potential to enhance the efficiency of forensic processes significantly. It facilitates the detection of microscopic bodily changes to determine the cause of death or living conditions, compares evidence against databases for weapon identification and blood spatter analysis, and reduces manual workload. AI also enables the electronic storage of biometric data\u2013such as facial features, retinal patterns, and fingerprints\u2013for more accurate identity verification. Additionally, AI-powered microscopy enhances the detection of biological traces on complex surfaces, while blood biomarker analysis allows for more precise estimations of time of death (Wankhade Et al., 2022).<\/p>\n<p>While AI holds great promise for the future of forensic medicine, a significant challenge remains: sourcing high-quality data to train the algorithms effectively. One of the more recent AI technologies making waves in the forensic anthropology sector is a new automated AI algorithm called the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). As described by researchers in Switzerland\u2019s national medical journal Healthcare, CNN is a Deep Learning algorithm that allows for the detection of microscopic skull damage from CT scans or soft-tissue predictions of a face based on the skull information provided (Thurzo Et al., 2021). While there are many advantages to using the CNN, the algorithm can be subject to biases in the same way human forensic experts can, as its assessment and pattern recognition of skulls and skeletons depend on the source data initially used for its AI training (2021).<\/p>\n<p><strong>3D Modeling<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Identifying complex trauma to bones\u2013such as distinguishing heat fractures following blunt force trauma\u2013remains a significant challenge in forensic anthropology. This is particularly true for irregular skeletal structures like the pelvis, where overlapping trauma types can be difficult to differentiate, leading to these bones often being understudied. A 2024 study done by researchers from the University of Alberta in collaboration with the Michigan State Police explores the use of 3D laser scans and modelling technology to provide a highly detailed analysis of irregular bones with trauma. The study aimed to better distinguish peri-mortem trauma (trauma occurring around the time of death) from post-mortem heat alterations and improve the forensic analysis accuracy of such cases (Friedlander Et al., 2024). The use of 3D laser scans and modelling technology provides very clear, detailed, and coloured scans of bones, showing distinctions between the characteristics of the fractures. Blunt force and sharp force trauma produce a colour gradient on the 3D model that is more gradual and irregular, while heat fractures are more neat and characterized by little colour variation on the 3D models (2024). Other conclusions were also drawn from the study, such as the differences in trauma on fresh bones and bones that have been exposed to the elements for longer. An example of this is the interstitial fluid and collagen fibrils in fresh bones absorbing force, causing more long and jagged fracture lines, as opposed to a brittle fracture that older bones may exhibit (2024).<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the integration of 3D modeling technology offers a reproducible and highly detailed approach for analyzing trauma in anatomically complex and historically understudied skeletal regions. The practicality of this advancement is further emphasized by the researchers, who note that \u201cin many instances, scanned 3D models can be 3D printed for handheld representation of the model without damaging or overhandling the remains\u201d (2024, p. 2). By enhancing the ability to differentiate between various types of trauma and allowing for more convenient and risk-averse methods of research, this technology significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of forensic interpretations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Ethics and Human Rights<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Working with human remains requires a great deal of consideration and respect for the dead. Forensic anthropologists have to think about the ethics of our use of human remains for scientific purposes. How do we conduct casework in the most respectable manner possible? While there are a wide range of ethical considerations to consider when contemplating a career in forensic anthropology, this chapter will focus on two major categories: working with human remains and acting as an expert within the medicolegal system.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Working with Human Remains<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Forensic anthropologists work with human remains in a number of contexts, including casework, excavation, research, and teaching. When working with human remains, it is always important to use proper handling techniques. To prevent damage to skeletal remains, bones should be handled over padded surfaces. Skulls should never be picked up by placing fingers in the eye orbits, foramen magnum (hole at the base of the skull for entry of the spinal cord), or through the zygomatic arches (cheekbones). Human remains, whether related to casework, fieldwork, donated skeletal collections, or research, were once living human beings. It is important to always bear in mind that work with remains should be ingrained with respect for the individual and their relatives. In addition to fieldwork, casework, and teaching, anthropologists are often invited to work with remains that come from a bioarchaeological context or from a human rights violation. While this discussion of ethics is not comprehensive, two case examples will be provided below in which an anthropologist must consider the ethical standards outlined above.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Modern Human Rights Violations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Forensic anthropologists may also be called to participate in criminal investigations involving human rights violations. Anthropological investigations may include assistance with identifications, determination of the number of victims, and trauma analyses. In this role, forensic anthropologists play an integral part in promoting human rights, preventing future human rights violations, and providing the evidence necessary to prosecute those responsible for past events. A few ethical considerations for the forensic anthropologist involved in human rights violations include the use of appropriate standards of identification, presenting reliable and unbiased testimony, and maintaining preservation of evidence. For a more comprehensive history of forensic anthropological contributions to human rights violations investigations (see Ubelaker 2018).<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong>Acting as an Expert in the Medicolegal System<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">In addition to the ethical considerations involved in working with human skeletal remains, forensic anthropologists must abide by ethical standards when they act as experts within the medicolegal system. The role of the forensic anthropologist within the medicolegal system is primarily to provide information to the medical examiner or coroner that will aid in the identification process or determination of cause and manner of death. Forensic anthropologists also may be called to testify in a court of law. In this capacity, forensic anthropologists should always abide by a series of ethical guidelines that pertain to their interpretation, presentation, and preservation of evidence used in criminal investigations. First and foremost, practitioners should never misrepresent their training or education. When appropriate, outside opinions and assistance in casework should be requested (e.g., consulting a radiologist for radiological examinations or odontologist for dental exams). The best interest of the decedent should always take precedence. All casework should be conducted in an unbiased way, and financial compensation should never be accepted as it can act as an incentive to take a biased stance regarding casework. All anthropological findings should be kept confidential, and release of information is best done by the medical examiner or coroner. Finally, while upholding personal ethical standards, forensic anthropologists are also expected to report any perceived ethical violations committed by their peers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ethical standards for the field of forensic anthropology are outlined by the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science, administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). OSAC and NIST recently began an initiative to develop standards that would strengthen the practice of forensic science both in the United States and internationally. OSAC\u2019s main objective is to \u201cstrengthen the nation\u2019s use of forensic science by facilitating the development of technically sound forensic science standards and by promoting the adoption of those standards by the forensic science community\u201d (NIST n.d.). Additionally, OSAC promotes the establishment of best practices and other guidelines to ensure that forensic science findings and their presentation are reliable and reproducible (NIST 2023).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Special Topic: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">There is a long history in the United States of systematic disenfranchisement of Native American people, including lack of respect for tribal sovereignty. This includes the egregious treatment of Native American human remains. Over several centuries, thousands of Native American remains were removed from tribal lands and held at institutions in the United States, such as museums and universities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In 1990, a landmark human rights federal law, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), spurred change in the professional standards and practice of biological anthropology and archaeology. NAGPRA established a legal avenue to provide protection for and repatriation of Native American remains, cultural items, and sacred objects removed from Federal or tribal lands to Native American lineal descendants and tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations. Human remains and associated artifacts, curated in museum collections and federally funded institutions, are subject to three primary provisions outlined by the NAGPRA statute: (1) protection for Native graves on federal and private land; (2) recognition of tribal authority on such lands; and (3) the requirement that all Native skeletal remains and associated artifacts be inventoried and culturally affiliated groups be consulted concerning decisions related to ownership and final disposition (Rose, Green, and Green 1996). NAGPRA legislation was enacted to ensure ethical consideration and treatment of Native remains and to improve dialogue between scientists and Native groups.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>For more information about NAGPRA, visit the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usbr.gov\/nagpra\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bureau of Reclamation NAGPRA website<\/a><\/li>\n<li>To read the text of the law, visit the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/101st-congress\/house-bill\/5237\">US Congress NAGPRA law website<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>For further discussion of NAGPRA history, please see <a href=\"https:\/\/textbooks.whatcom.edu\/tracesarchaeology\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>TRACES: <\/em><em>An Open Invitation to <\/em><em>Archaeology <\/em>open textbook website<\/a><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Becoming a Forensic Anthropologist<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">What does it take to be a forensic anthropologist? Forensic anthropologists are first and foremost anthropologists. While many forensic anthropologists have an undergraduate degree in anthropology, they may also major in biology, criminal justice, pre-law, pre-med, and many other related fields. Practicing forensic anthropologists typically have an advanced degree, either a Master\u2019s or Doctoral degree in Anthropology. Additional training and experience in archaeology, the medico-legal system, rules of evidence, and expert witness testimony are also common. Practicing forensic anthropologists are also encouraged to be board-certified through the American Board of Forensic Anthropology (ABFA). Learn more about the field and educational opportunities on the ABFA website: <a class=\"rId111\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theabfa.org\/coursework\">https:\/\/www.theabfa.org\/coursework<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2>Summary<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"123\" data-end=\"728\">As a subfield of biological anthropology, forensic anthropology encompasses a wide range of methods used to better understand human remains, whether from the present or the past. Through skeletal analysis, forensic anthropologists approach the study of the deceased from multiple perspectives. For instance, they may begin by identifying whether bones are human or animal, determining whether they are modern or archaeological, and assessing whether the remains were buried alone or as part of a larger assemblage. These initial steps provide a foundation for interpreting what the remains represent.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"730\" data-end=\"1123\">Once a clearer understanding of the remains is established, forensic anthropologists can construct a biological profile of the individual. This process involves estimating biological sex, population affinity, age at death, and stature, as well as examining unique or individualizing features. Together, these elements allow anthropologists to build a more complete picture of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1125\" data-end=\"1748\">Another central responsibility of forensic anthropologists is investigating how the individual died. Trauma analysis plays a key role in this process: Was the person affected by sharp force, blunt force, projectile injuries, or thermal damage? Determining the timing of injuries (whether they occurred before, at, or after death) along with analyzing what happened to the remains afterward, helps anthropologists understand both the cause and context of death. Taphonomic changes provide additional insight into the circumstances surrounding an individual\u2019s final moments.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1750\" data-end=\"2492\">Working with human remains requires careful consideration and profound respect for the deceased. For this reason, strict methods and ethical guidelines are integral to the profession. Proper handling techniques ensure that human remains are treated with dignity, while ethical standards guide anthropologists in their dual role within both medical and legal systems. Because their expertise can influence the interpretation and presentation of evidence in criminal investigations, forensic anthropologists must adhere to ethical principles. These standards are outlined by the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science, administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">Review Questions<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What is forensic anthropology? What are the seven primary steps involved in a skeletal analysis?<\/li>\n<li>What are the major components of a biological profile? Why are forensic anthropologists often-tasked with creating biological profiles for unknown individuals?<\/li>\n<li>What are the four major types of skeletal trauma?<\/li>\n<li>What is taphonomy, and why is an understanding of taphonomy often critical in forensic anthropology analyses?<\/li>\n<li>What are some of the ethical considerations faced by forensic anthropologists?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">For Further Exploration<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theabfa.org\/coursework\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The American Board of Forensic Anthropology (ABFA)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aafs.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/textbooks.whatcom.edu\/tracesarchaeology\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TRACES Bioarchaeology<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/transdoetaskforce.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trans Doe Task Force<\/a><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\">References<\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Adams, Bradley J., and Lyle W. Konigsberg, eds. 2008. <em>Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Remains<\/em>. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Beatrice, Jared S., and Angela Soler. 2016. \u201cSkeletal Indicators of Stress: A Component of the Biocultural Profile of Undocumented Migrants in Southern Arizona.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences <\/em>61 (5): 1164\u20131172.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Berg, Gregory E. 2017. \u201cSex Estimation of Unknown Human Skeletal Remains.\u201d In <em>Forensic Anthropology: A Comprehensive Introduction, Second Edition<\/em>, edited by Natalie R. Langley and MariaTeresa A. Tersigni-Tarrant, 143\u2013159. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Bethard, Jonathan D., and Elizabeth A. DiGangi. 2020. \u201cLetter to the Editor\u2014Moving Beyond a Lost Cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry Estimates in the United States.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em> 65 (5): 1791\u20131792.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Birkby, Walter H., Todd W. Fenton, and Bruce E. Anderson. 2008. \u201cIdentifying Southwest Hispanics Using Nonmetric Traits and the Cultural Profile.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences <\/em>53 (1): 29\u201333.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Blatt, Samantha, Amy Michael, and Lisa Bright. Forthcoming. \u201cBioarchaeology: Interpreting Human Behavior from Skeletal Remains.\u201d In <em>TRACES: <\/em><em>An Open Invitation to <\/em><em>Archaeology<\/em>. https:\/\/textbooks.whatcom.edu\/tracesarchaeology\/.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Brooks, S., and J. M. Suchey. 1990. \u201cSkeletal Age Determination Based on the Os Pubis: A Comparison of the Acs\u00e1di-Nemesk\u00e9ri and Suchey-Brooks Methods.\u201d <em>Human Evolution <\/em>5 (3): 227\u2013238.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Buchanan, Shelby. 2014. \u201cBone Modification in Male to Female Transgender Surgeries: Considerations for the Forensic Anthropologist.\u201d MA thesis, Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Cunningham, Craig, Louise Scheuer, and Sue Black. 2016. <em>Developmental Juvenile Osteology, Second Edition<\/em>. London: Elsevier Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p>Friedlander, H., Adeeb, S., Correia, P. M., Stone, D., &amp; Brooks\u2010Lim, E. (2024). An innovative way to use 3d modeling on burnt bone to differentiate heat fractures from blunt and sharp force trauma. <em>WIREs Forensic Science<\/em>, 6(5), 1\u201318. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wfs2.1525\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wfs2.1525<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Galloway, Alison, ed. 1999. <em>Broken Bones: Anthropological Analysis of Blunt Force Trauma<\/em>. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, LTD.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Hefner, Joseph T., and Kandus C. Linde. 2018. <em>Atlas of Human Cranial <\/em><em>Macromorphoscopic<\/em><em> Traits<\/em>. San Diego: Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">\u0130\u015fcan, M. Y., S. R. Loth, and R. K. Wright. 1984. \u201cAge Estimation from the Rib by Phase Analysis: White Males.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences <\/em>29 (4): 1094\u20131104.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">\u0130\u015fcan, M. Y., S. R. Loth, and R. K. Wright. 1985. \u201cAge Estimation from the Rib by Phase Analysis: White Females.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences <\/em>30 (3): 853\u2013863.Katz, Darryl, and Judy Myers Suchey. 1986. \u201cAge Determination of the Male Os Pubis.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology <\/em>69 (4): 427\u2013435.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Komar, Debra A., and Jane E. Buikstra. 2008. <em>Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice<\/em>. New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Langley, Natalie R., Alice F. Gooding, and MariaTeresa Tersigni-Tarrant. 2017. \u201cAge Estimation Methods.\u201d In <em>Forensic Anthropology: A Comprehensive Introduction, Second Edition<\/em>, edited by Natalie R. Langley and MariaTeresa A. Tersigni-Tarrant, 175\u2013191. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Lovell, Nancy C. 1997. \u201cTrauma Analysis in Paleopathology.\u201d <em>Yearbook of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 104 (S25): 139\u2013170.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) 1990 (25 U.S. Code 3001 et seq.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). N.d. \u201cThe Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science.\u201d Accessed April 18, 2023. <a class=\"rId120\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/topics\/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/topics\/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ousley, Stephen. 1995. \u201cShould We Estimate Biological or Forensic Stature?\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em> 40(5): 768\u2013773.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Phenice, T. W. 1969. \u201cA Newly Developed Visual Method of Sexing the Os Pubis.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 30 (2): 297\u2013302.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Rose, Jerome C., Thomas J. Green, and Victoria D. Green. 1996. \u201cNAGPRA Is Forever: Osteology and the Repatriation of Skeletons.\u201d <em>Annual Review of Anthropology <\/em>25: 81\u2013103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Schaefer, Maureen, Sue Black, and Louise Scheuer. <em>Juvenile Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manua<\/em>l. 2009. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Schall, Jenna L., Tracy L. Rogers, and Jordan D. Deschamps-Braly. 2020. \u201cBreaking the Binary: The Identification of Trans-women in Forensic Anthropology.\u201d <em>Forensic Science International<\/em> 309: 110220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.forsciint.2020.110220.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). 2010a. \u201cPersonal Identification.\u201d Last modified June 3, 2010. <a class=\"rId121\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_personal_identification.pdf\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_personal_identification.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). 2010b. \u201cSex Assessment.\u201d Last modified June 3, 2010. <a class=\"rId122\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_sex_assessment.pdf\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_sex_assessment.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). 2011. \u201cTrauma Analysis.\u201d Last modified May 27, 2011. <a class=\"rId123\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_trauma.pdf\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_trauma.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). 2012. \u201cStature Estimation.\u201d Last modified August 2, 2012. <a class=\"rId124\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_stature_estimation.pdf\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_stature_estimation.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). 2013. \u201cAge Estimation.\u201d Last modified January 22, 2013. <a class=\"rId125\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_age_estimation.pdf\">https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2018\/03\/13\/swganth_age_estimation.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Soler, Angela, and Jared S. Beatrice. 2018. \u201cExpanding the Role of Forensic Anthropology in Humanitarian Crisis: An Example from the USA-Mexico Border. In <em>Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation: Perspectives from Forensic Science<\/em>, edited by Krista E. Latham and Alyson J. O\u2019Daniel, 115\u2013128. New York: Springer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Soler, Angela, Robin Reineke, Jared Beatrice, and Bruce E. Anderson. 2019. \u201cEtched in Bone: Embodied Suffering in the Remains of Undocumented Migrants.\u201d <em>In<\/em> <em>The Border and Its Bodies: The Embodiment of Risk along the U.S.-M\u00e9xico Line<\/em>, edited by Thomas E. Sheridan and Randall H. McGuire, 173\u2013207. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Stull, Kyra E., Eric J. Bartelink, Alexandra R. Klales, Gregory E. Berg, Michael W. Kenyhercz, Erica N. L\u2019Abb\u00e9, Matthew C. Go, et al.. 2021. \u201cCommentary on: Bethard JD, DiGangi EA. Letter to the Editor\u2014Moving Beyond a Lost Cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry Estimates in the United States. J Forensic Sci. 2020;65(5):1791\u20132. doi: 10.1111\/1556-4029.14513.\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences <\/em>66 (1): 417\u2013420.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tallman, Sean D., Caroline D. Kincer, and Eric D. Plemons. 2022. \u201cCentering Transgender Individuals in Forensic Anthropology and Expanding Binary Sex Estimation in Casework and Research.\u201d Special issue, \u201cDiversity and Inclusion,\u201d <em>Forensic Anthropology<\/em> 5 (2): 161\u2013180.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Tersigni-Tarrant, MariaTeresa A., and Natalie R. Langley. 2017. \u201cHuman Osteology.\u201d In <em>Forensic Anthropology: A Comprehensive Introduction, Second Edition<\/em>, edited by Natalie R. Langley and MariaTeresa A. Tersigni-Tarrant, 81\u2013109. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.<\/p>\n<p>Thurzo, A., Kosn\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1, H. S., Kurilov\u00e1, V., Kosme\u013e, S., Be\u0148u\u0161, R., Moravansk\u00fd, N., Kov\u00e1\u010d, P., Kuracinov\u00e1, K. M., Palkovi\u010d, M., &amp; Varga, I. (2021). Use of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine, Forensic Anthropology and Clinical Anatomy. <em>Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 9<\/em>(11), 1545. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare9111545\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare9111545<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">Ubelaker, Douglas H. 2018. \u201cA History of Forensic Anthropology.\u201d Special issue, \u201cCentennial Anniversary Issue of AJPA,\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 165 (4): 915\u2013923.<\/p>\n<p>Wankhade, T. D., Ingale, S. W., Mohite, P. M., &amp; Bankar, N. J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in forensic medicine and toxicology: The future of forensic medicine. <em>Cureus<\/em>. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.28376\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.28376<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\">White, Tim D., and Pieter A. Folkens. 2005. <em>The Human Bone Manual<\/em>. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Winburn, Allysha P., and Bridget Algee-Hewitt. 2021. \u201cEvaluating Population Affinity Estimates in Forensic Anthropology: Insights from the Forensic Anthropology Database for Assessing Methods Accuracy (FADAMA).\u201d <em>Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em> 66 (4): 1210\u20131219.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Winburn, Allysha Powanda, Sarah Kiley Schoff, and Michael W. Warren. 2016. \u201cAssemblages of the Dead: Interpreting the Biocultural and Taphonomic Signature of Afro- Cuban Palo Practice in Florida.\u201d <em>Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage <\/em>5 (1): 1\u201337.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_958\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_958\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_960\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_960\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Dr. Salinda Hess adopted Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology for ANTH 203: Culture and Biology at Concordia University in 2023. To reflect the ongoing changes and developments within the field of biological anthropology and to integrate Canadian perspectives, her syllabus included an open assignment titled \u201cGroup Participation in Open Pedagogy Textbook Project.\u201d The resulting student chapter-level feedback from this interactive assignment led to revisions, updates, corrections, and\/or added materials.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lola Leus<\/strong> assisted Hess in reviewing, compiling, and making sense of the student assignments, and integrating the collective insights from the course into the textbook. She worked on showing the revisions in the adapted version and annotated second edition, and integrating their text into the third edition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Adam Garcia<\/strong> played an editorial role and a technical Pressbooks role.\u00a0He aided in selecting and editing insights from student assignments, checking citations, and integrating revisions in the customized text. Additionally, He worked on writing the sections of each chapter integrating insights from the ANTH-203 course into what is now the third edition.<\/p>\n<table aria-labelledby=\"table-title\">\n<caption id=\"table-title\">Student Contributors by Chapter<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"col\">Chapter Title<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Student Contributors<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>3. Social and Biopolitical Dimensions of Evolutionary Thinking<\/td>\n<td>Daphn\u00e9e-Tiffany Kirouac Millan, Davina Paradis, Jung Jin Kim, and Nathan Dennis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4. Molecular Biology and Genetics<\/td>\n<td>Emma Costa, Shima Gahima, Will Lefebvre, Audrey Ch\u00e9kina\u00ebl<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5. Forces of Evolution<\/td>\n<td>Corin Laberge, Hazel Moorcroft, Isabella Michel, Julian J. Pantoja Quiroz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8. Stones and Bones: Studying the Fossil Record<\/td>\n<td>Catherine Belec, Maria Papadakis, Camille Senior and Nadjat Baril<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10. Early Hominins<\/td>\n<td>Angela Durastanti, Bryce Muller, Gabriel Barr, Maisie Babbington-Bolduc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12. Archaic Homo<\/td>\n<td>Peyton Dagg, Bryana Henry, Anoriel Jacques, Saehee Yoon, and Brandon Hawke<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>16. Forensic Anthropology<\/td>\n<td>Amelia Roberts, Elyse Racicot, Emmanuelle Hunter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_962\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_962\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_964\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_964\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_966\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_966\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>\/*increase font size of navigation bar*\/<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__previous a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.a11y-fontsize, .a11y-fontsize:focus, .a11y-fontsize:hover, a11y-fontsize:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.a11y-fontsize.focus,.a11y-fontsize:focus,.a11y-fontsize:hover {<br \/>\n  background-color: #dfeccf;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n  text-decoration: underline;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up {<br \/>\n    background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color:  #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:focus {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action.focus,.call-to-action:focus,.call-to-action:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color: #6dc5c9;<br \/>\n    border-color: #000;<br \/>\n    color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading {<br \/>\n  background-color: #3FA6AA;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading_next a:focus,.nav-reading_previous a:focus {<br \/>\n  background: #6dc5c9 !important;<br \/>\n    color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a:hover,.nav-reading__previous a:hover {<br \/>\n    background: #e9e3d3 !important;<br \/>\n  color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* Background color for textboxes. *\/<\/p>\n<p>:root {<br \/>\n  --lightblue: #D7F4F7;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.no-borders {<br \/>\n  border: none;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* white text for learning objectives *\/<br \/>\ntextbox__title{<br \/>\n  color: white !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h1, h2, h3, h4 {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>entry-title {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h2{<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.75em;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h3{<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.45em;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_968\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_968\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>\/*increase font size of navigation bar*\/<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__previous a {<br \/>\n  padding: 10px;<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.3em;<br \/>\n  background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.a11y-fontsize, .a11y-fontsize:focus, .a11y-fontsize:hover, a11y-fontsize:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.a11y-fontsize.focus,.a11y-fontsize:focus,.a11y-fontsize:hover {<br \/>\n  background-color: #dfeccf;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n  text-decoration: underline;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up {<br \/>\n    background-color: #912338;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color:  #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n    border: 1px solid #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:focus {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__up:active {<br \/>\n  background-color: #b0babf;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action {<br \/>\n  background-color: #e9e3d3;<br \/>\n  border-color: #000;<br \/>\n  color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.call-to-action.focus,.call-to-action:focus,.call-to-action:hover {<br \/>\n    background-color: #6dc5c9;<br \/>\n    border-color: #000;<br \/>\n    color: #000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading {<br \/>\n  background-color: #3FA6AA;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading_next a:focus,.nav-reading_previous a:focus {<br \/>\n  background: #6dc5c9 !important;<br \/>\n    color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<br \/>\n.nav-reading__next a:hover,.nav-reading__previous a:hover {<br \/>\n    background: #e9e3d3 !important;<br \/>\n  color: #000000;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* Background color for textboxes. *\/<\/p>\n<p>:root {<br \/>\n  --lightblue: #D7F4F7;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.no-borders {<br \/>\n  border: none;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>\/* white text for learning objectives *\/<br \/>\ntextbox__title{<br \/>\n  color: white !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h1, h2, h3, h4 {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>entry-title {<br \/>\n  font-weight: bold !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h2{<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.75em !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>h3{<br \/>\n  font-size: 1.5em !important;<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_970\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_970\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_972\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_972\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>This page provides a record of edits and changes made to this book since its initial publication. If the change is minor, the version number increases by 0.1. If the edits involve substantial updates, the version number increases to the next full number. Due to the nature of the open textbook being continuously updated, the addition or removal of a resource is not recorded on this page.<\/p>\n<p>For feedback get in touch with salinda.hess@concordia.ca.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%; height: 75px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 6.78138%;\" scope=\"col\">Version<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 7.38866%;\" scope=\"col\">Date<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 75.1012%;\" scope=\"col\">Change<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6275%;\" scope=\"col\">Affected Web Page<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 6.78138%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\/\">1.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 7.38866%;\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 75.1012%;\">Original publication date. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd Edition<\/a> 2023 by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6275%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 30px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 30px; width: 6.78138%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/\">1.1<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 30px; width: 7.38866%;\">2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 30px; width: 75.1012%;\">Adopted with annotations by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 30px; width: 10.6275%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 6.78138%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">2.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 7.38866%;\">2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 75.1012%;\">Customized by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6275%;\">ALL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_974\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_974\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>This page provides a record of edits and changes made to this book since its initial publication. If the change is minor, the version number increases by 0.1. If the edits involve substantial updates, the version number increases to the next full number. Due to the nature of the open textbook being continuously updated, the addition or removal of a resource is not recorded on this page.<\/p>\n<p>For feedback get in touch with salinda.hess@concordia.ca.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%; height: 107px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;\" scope=\"col\">Version<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;\" scope=\"col\">Date<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;\" scope=\"col\">Change<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;\" scope=\"col\">Affected Web Page<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\/\">1.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;\">Original publication date. <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd Edition<\/a> 2023 by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License<\/a>, except where otherwise noted.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/\">1.1<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;\">2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;\">Adopted with annotations by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 46px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">2.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px;\">2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 75.1012%;\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology \u2013 2nd edition was customized by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 10.6275%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_976\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_976\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_978\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_978\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>This page provides a record of edits and changes made to this book since its initial publication. If the change is minor, the version number increases by 0.1. If the edits involve substantial updates, the version number increases to the next full number. Due to the nature of the open textbook being continuously updated, the addition or removal of a resource is not recorded on this page.<\/p>\n<p>For feedback get in touch with salinda.hess@concordia.ca.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 100%; height: 138px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 8.46098%;\" scope=\"col\">Version<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 5.83516%;\" scope=\"col\">Date<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 75.0547%;\" scope=\"col\">Change<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6492%;\" scope=\"col\">Affected Web Page<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">1.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%; height: 31px;\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 75.0547%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">, <\/a>2019\u00a0edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Released on the University of Hawai\u02bbi's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%; height: 31px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 8.46098%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\/\">2.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 5.83516%; height: 31px;\">2023<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 75.0547%; height: 31px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.calstate.edu\/explorationsbioanth2\" rel=\"cc:attributionURL\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition<\/a>, 2023 edited by Beth Shook, Lara Braff, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\" rel=\"license\">CC BY-NC<\/a>, except where otherwise noted. Released on the California State University's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.6492%; height: 31px;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 8.46098%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations\/\">2.1<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 5.83516%;\">2024<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 75.0547%;\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, annotated 2nd Edition, 2024. Adopted with annotations by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology during Fall 2023 and Fall 2024. Released on Concordia University Library's Pressbooks platform.<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px; width: 10.6492%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 8.46098%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations2\/\">3.0<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 5.83516%;\">2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 75.0547%;\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 3rd edition, 2026. Customized by Salinda Hess for the course ANTH 203: Culture and Biology<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 46px; width: 10.6492%;\">All<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_980\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_980\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_982\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_982\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_984\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_984\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Chain of amino acids that folds into a three-dimensional structure that allows a cell to function in a variety of ways.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_986\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_986\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Molecules composed of carbon and hydrogen atoms that can be broken down to supply energy.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_988\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_988\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A molecule that carries the hereditary information passed down from parents to offspring. DNA can be described as a \u201cdouble helix\u201d\u2019 shape. It includes two chains of nucleotides held together by hydrogen bonds with a sugar phosphate backbone.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_990\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_990\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Single-celled or multicelled organism characterized by a distinct nucleus, with each organelle surrounded by its own membrane.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_992\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_992\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The collective genomes of the community of microorganisms that humans have living inside of their bodies.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_994\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_994\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Two layers of lipids that form a barrier due to the properties of a hydrophilic (water-loving) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_996\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_996\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Double-membrane cellular organelle that helps protect DNA and also regulates nuclear activities.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_998\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_998\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A high-energy compound produced by mitochondria that powers cellular processes.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1000\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1000\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Circular DNA segment found in mitochondria that is inherited maternally.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1002\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1002\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A double-layered membrane that encircles the nucleus.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1004\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1004\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A nucleotide sequence variation from the template DNA strand that can occur during replication. Mutations can also happen during recombination.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1006\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1006\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>DNA that is extracted from organic remains and that often dates from hundreds to thousands of years ago. Also, aDNA is typically degraded (i.e., damaged) due to exposure to the elements such as heat, acidity, and humidity.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1008\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1008\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A biochemical structural component of DNA. The \u201cbackbone\u201d consists of deoxyribose sugars and phosphate molecules.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1010\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1010\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Proteins that DNA wraps around to assist with DNA organization within the nucleus.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1012\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1012\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>DNA molecule that is wrapped around protein complexes, including histones.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1014\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1014\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A structural feature that is defined as the \u201ccenter\u201d of a chromosome and that creates two different arm lengths. This term also refers to the region of attachment for microtubules during mitosis and meiosis.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1016\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1016\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The order of nucleotide bases. A DNA sequence can be short, long, or representative of entire chromosomes or organismal genomes.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1018\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1018\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A cycle the cell undergoes with checkpoints between phases to ensure that DNA replication and cell division occur properly.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1020\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1020\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The recruitment of proteins to separate DNA strands and begin DNA replication.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1022\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1022\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The halt of DNA replication activity that occurs when a DNA sequence \u201cstop\u201d codon is encountered.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1024\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1024\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>DNA template strand in which replication proceeds continuously.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1026\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1026\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Enzyme that adds nucleotides to existing nucleic acid strands during DNA replication. These enzymes can be distinguished by their processivity (e.g., DNA replication).<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1028\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1028\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Specialized cells that form gametes (egg and sperm cells).<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1030\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1030\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Refers to an organism or cell with two sets of chromosomes.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1032\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1032\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>During DNA replication, sister chromatids are produced on the chromosome. In cell division, sister chromatids are pulled apart so that two cells can be formed. In meiosis, sister chromatids are also the sites of genetic recombination.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1034\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1034\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Haploid cells referred to as an egg and sperm that will fuse together during sexual reproduction to form a diploid organism.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1036\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1036\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A cellular process that occurs during meiosis I in which homologous chromosomes pair up and sister chromatids on different chromosomes physically swap genetic information.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1038\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1038\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A cell with an unexpected amount of chromosomes. The loss or gain of chromosomes can occur during mitotic or meiotic division.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1040\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1040\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Preparatory period of the cell cycle when increased metabolic demand allows for DNA replication and doubling of the cell prior to cell division.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1042\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1042\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Organic molecules that are the building blocks of protein. Each of the 20 different amino acids have their own unique chemical property. Amino acids are chained together to form proteins.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1044\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1044\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A multi-step process by which amino acids are strung together by RNA machinery read from a DNA template.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_744\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_744\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kerryn Warren, Ph.D., Grad Coach International<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lindsay Hunter, M.A., University of Iowa<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Navashni Naidoo, M.Sc., University of Cape Town<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Silindokuhle Mavuso, M.Sc., University of Witwatersrand<\/span><\/p>\n<h6>Student contributors to this chapter: Angela Durastanti, Bryce Muller, Gabriel Barr, Maisie Babbington-Bolduc<\/h6>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>This chapter is a revision from <\/em><em>\"<\/em><a class=\"rId7\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/chapter-9-early-hominins-2\/\"><em>Chapter 9: Early Hominins<\/em><\/a><em>\" <\/em><em>by Kerryn Warren, K. Lindsay Hunter, Navashni Naidoo, Silindokuhle Mavuso, Kimberleigh Tommy, Rosa Moll, and Nomawethu Hlazo<\/em><em>. In <\/em><a class=\"rId8\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\"><em>Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, first edition<\/em><\/a><em>, edited by Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera, and Lara Braff, which is licensed under <\/em><a class=\"rId9\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\"><em>CC BY-NC 4.0<\/em><\/a><em>. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--learning-objectives\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<h2 class=\"textbox__title\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Learning Objectives<br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000\">Understand what is meant by \u201cderived\u201d and \u201cancestral\u201d traits and why this is relevant for understanding early hominin evolution.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000\">Understand changing paleoclimates and paleoenvironments as potential factors influencing early hominin adaptations.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000\">Describe the anatomical changes associated with bipedalism and dentition in early hominins, as well as their implications..<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000\">Describe early hominin genera and species, including their currently understood dates and geographic expanses.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000\">Describe the earliest stone tool techno-complexes and their impact on the transition from early hominins to our genus.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"__UNKNOWN__\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Defining Hominins<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">It is through our study of our hominin ancestors and relatives that we are exposed to a world of \u201cmight have beens\u201d: of other paths not taken by our species, other ways of being human. But to better understand these different evolutionary trajectories, we must first define the terms we are using. If an imaginary line were drawn between ourselves and our closest relatives, the great apes, <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1200\">bipedalism<\/a><\/strong> (or habitually walking upright on two feet) is where that line would be. <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1270\">Hominin<\/a><\/strong>, then, means everyone on \u201cour\u201d side of the line: humans and all of our extinct bipedal ancestors and relatives since our divergence from the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1272\">last common ancestor (LCA)<\/a><\/strong> we share with chimpanzees.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Historic interpretations of our evolution, prior to our finding of early hominin <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1274\"><strong>fossils<\/strong><\/a>, varied. Debates in the mid-1800s regarding hominin origins focused on two key issues:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Where did we evolve?<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Which traits evolved first?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Within this conversation, naturalists and early <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1276\">paleoanthropologists<\/a><\/strong> (people who study human evolution) speculated about which human traits came first. These included the evolution of a big brain (<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1278\"><strong>encephalization<\/strong><\/a>), the evolution of the way in which we move about on two legs (bipedalism), and the evolution of our flat faces and small teeth (indications of dietary change). Original hypotheses suggested that, in order to be motivated to change diet and move about in a bipedal fashion, the large brain needed to have evolved first, as is seen in the fossil species mentioned above.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">However, we now know that bipedal locomotion is one of the first things that evolved in our lineage, with early relatives having more apelike dentition and small brain sizes. While brain size expansion is seen primarily in our genus, <em>Homo<\/em>, earlier hominin brain sizes were highly variable between and within taxa, from 300 cc (cranial capacity, cm<sup>3<\/sup>), estimated in <em>Ardipithecus<\/em>, to 550 cc, estimated in <em>Paranthropus boisei<\/em>. The lower estimates are well within the range of variation of nonhuman extant great apes. In addition, body size variability also plays a role in the interpretation of whether brain size could be considered large or small for a particular species or specimen. In this chapter, we will tease out the details of early hominin evolution in terms of <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1280\"><strong>morphology<\/strong><\/a> (i.e. the study of the form, size, or shape of things; in this case, skeletal parts).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">We also know that early human evolution occurred in a very complicated fashion. There were multiple species (multiple genera) that featured diversity in their diets and locomotion. Specimens have been found all along the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1282\"><strong>East African Rift System <\/strong>(<strong>EARS)<\/strong><\/a>; that is, in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi; see Figure 9.1), in limestone caves in South Africa, and in Chad. Dates of these early relatives range from around 7 million years ago (mya) to around 1 mya, overlapping temporally with members of our genus, <em>Homo<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/image38.png\" alt=\"Patchy green mountain alongside a deep sandy valley in East Africa.\" width=\"610\" height=\"277\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.1: East African Rift System (EARS). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ninara\/8624605781\/in\/photolist-x2yH7-x2yHe-VfVWuD-e98mPF-SzzjsU-2bsBZhC-2hHec7m-xtJ7Ez-NXnXvh-7Yg3uo-2cS3FgG-2hjo1Dc-2hjGoTS-nnumi8-82U66W-dMNn7B-8jdVbd-NWDg8-NW6fj-ebhx5w-bkFv1G-Ct5ZD-5JQk8A-y6TgAc-x9k6oe-2ebLTDC-WcPMnJ-2ekh6CS-Cu3LH-xNHDFK-9RUsZi-94jVt4-P46uiB-QFyjyE-crU8N7-5JLJKV-2ekSgk8-5JL454-2cPgZrF-2bHfQZu-dMTVPN-6yUbeN-jzMicQ-48XjU9-2etR2Ze-Styrvw-crU7V7-2wakq3-crU6Z1-2etR2XR\/\">IMG_1696 Great Rift Valley<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/ninara\/\">Ninara<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Yet there is still so much to understand. Modern debates now look at the relatedness of these species to us and to one another, and they consider which of these species were able to make and use tools. As a result, every <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1284\">site<\/a><\/strong> discovery in the patchy hominin fossil record tells us more about our evolution. In addition, recent scientific techniques (not available even ten years ago) provide new insights into the diets, environments, and lifestyles of these ancient relatives.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">In the past, <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1288\"><strong>taxonom<\/strong><strong>y<\/strong><\/a> was primarily based on morphology. Today it is tied to known relationships based on molecular <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1290\"><strong>phylogeny<\/strong><\/a> (e.g., based on DNA) or a combination of the two. This is complicated when applied to living <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1286\"><strong>taxa<\/strong><\/a>, but becomes much more difficult when we try to categorize ancestor-descendant relationships for long-extinct species whose molecular information is no longer preserved. We therefore find ourselves falling back on morphological comparisons, often of teeth and partially fossilized skeletal material.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">It is here that we turn to the related concepts of <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1292\">cladistics<\/a> <\/strong>and <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1294\">phylogenetics<\/a><\/strong><strong>. <\/strong>Cladistics groups organisms according to their last common ancestors based on shared <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1126\">derived traits<\/a><\/strong>. In the case of early hominins, these are often morphological traits that differ from those seen in earlier populations. These new or modified traits provide evidence of evolutionary relationships, and organisms with the same derived traits are grouped in the same <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1116\">clade<\/a> <\/strong>(Figure 9.2). For example, if we use feathers as a trait, we can group pigeons and ostriches into the clade of birds. In this chapter, we will examine the grouping of the Robust Australopithecines, whose cranial and dental features differ from those of earlier hominins, and therefore are considered derived.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 708px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image48.png\" alt=\"Phylogenetic tree shows clades and non clade groupings.\" width=\"708\" height=\"192\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.2: Clades refer to groups of species or taxa that share a common ancestor. In <span class=\"ILfuVd\" lang=\"en\"><span class=\"hgKElc\">a phylogeny, a clade is a complete group of lineages, including their last common ancestor. Groupings that do not include a common ancestor and <em>all<\/em> of its descendants are not clades. <\/span><\/span>Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/chapter-9-early-hominins-2\/\">Clades (Figure 9.2)<\/a> original to <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> by Katie Nelson is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<br \/><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Dig Deeper: Problems Defining Hominin Species<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">It is worth noting that species designations for early hominin specimens are often highly contested. This is due to the fragmentary nature of the fossil record, the large timescale (millions of years) with which paleoanthropologists need to work, and the difficulty in evaluating whether morphological differences and similarities are due to meaningful phylogenetic or biological differences or subtle differences\/variation in niche occupation or time. In other words, do morphological differences really indicate different species? How would classifying species in the paleoanthropological record compare with classifying living species today, for whom we can sequence genomes and observe lifestyles?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There are also broader philosophical differences among researchers when it comes to paleo-species designations. Some scientists, known as \u201c<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1296\"><strong>lumpers<\/strong>,<\/a>\u201d argue that large variability is expected among multiple populations in a given species over time. These researchers will therefore prefer to \u201clump\u201d specimens of subtle differences into single taxa. Others, known as \u201c<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1298\"><strong>splitters<\/strong><\/a>,\u201d argue that species variability can be measured and that even subtle differences can imply differences in niche occupation that are extreme enough to mirror modern species differences. In general, splitters would consider geographic differences among populations as meaning that a species is <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1300\">polytypic<\/a><\/strong>. This is worth keeping in mind when learning about why species designations may be contested.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 520px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image8.jpg\" alt=\"A graph shows a curved line depicting changes in morphology among two species over time.\" width=\"520\" height=\"292\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.3: This graph demonstrates the concept of a chronospecies, where one species (Species A) \u201cevolves\u201d into another (Species B). Credit: Chronospecies original to Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology, 2nd edition by Kerryn Warren is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<br \/><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">This further plays a role in evaluating ancestry. Debates over which species \u201cgave rise\u201d to which continue to this day. It is common to try to create \u201clineages\u201d of species to determine when one species evolved into another over time. We refer to these as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1302\"><strong>chronospecies<\/strong><\/a> (Figure 9.3). Constructed hominin phylogenetic trees are routinely variable, changing with new specimen discoveries, new techniques for evaluating and comparing species, and, some have argued, nationalist or biased interpretations of the record. More recently, some researchers have shifted away from \u201ctreelike\u201d models of ancestry toward more nuanced metaphors such as the \u201cbraided stream,\u201d where some levels of interbreeding among species and populations are seen as natural processes of evolution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Finally, it is worth considering the process of fossil discovery and publication. Some fossils are easily diagnostic to a species level and allow for easy and accurate interpretation. Some, however, are more controversial. This could be because they do not easily preserve or are incomplete, making it difficult to compare and place within a specific species (e.g., a fossil of a patella or knee bone). Researchers often need to make several important claims when announcing or publishing a find: a secure date (if possible), clear association with other finds, and an adequate comparison among multiple species (both extant and fossil). Therefore, it is not uncommon that an important find was made years before it is scientifically published.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Paleoenvironment and Hominin Evolution<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There is no doubt that one of the major selective pressures in hominin evolution is the environment. Large-scale changes in global and regional climate, as well as alterations to the environment, are thought to be linked to all\u00a0hominin diversification, dispersal, and extinction (Maslin et al. 2014). Environmental reconstructions often use modern analogues. Let us take, for instance, the hippopotamus. It is an animal that thrives in environments that have abundant water to keep its skin cool and moist. If the environment for some reason becomes drier, it is expected that hippopotamus populations will reduce. If a drier environment becomes wetter, it is possible that hippopotamus populations may be attracted to the new environment and thrive. Such instances have occurred multiple times in the past, and the bones of some <strong style=\"background-color: transparent\"><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1308\">fauna<\/a><\/strong> (i.e., animals, like the hippopotamus) that are sensitive to these changes give us insights into these events.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Yet reconstructing a <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1304\">paleoenvironment<\/a><\/strong> relies on a range of techniques, which vary depending on whether research interests focus on local changes or more global environmental changes\/reconstructions. For local environments (such as a single site or region), comparing the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1306\">faunal assemblages<\/a> <\/strong>(collections of fossils of animals found at a site) with animals found in certain modern environments allows us to determine if past environments mirror current ones in the region. Changes in the faunal assemblages, as well as when they occur and how they occur, tell us about past environmental changes. Other techniques are also useful in this regard. Chemical analyses, for instance, can reveal the diets of individual fauna, providing clues as to the relative wetness or dryness of their environment (e.g., nitrogen <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1310\"><strong>isotopes<\/strong><\/a>; Kingston and Harrison 2007).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Global climatic changes in the distant past, which fluctuated between being colder and drier and warmer and wetter on average, would have global implications for environmental change (Figure 9.4). These can be studied by comparing marine core and terrestrial soil data across multiple sites. These techniques are based on chemical analysis, such as examination of the nitrogen and oxygen isotopes in shells and sediments. Similarly, analyzing pollen grains shows which kinds of <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1312\"><strong>flora<\/strong> <\/a> survived in an environment at a specific time period. There are multiple lines of evidence that allow us to visualize global climate trends over millions of years (although it should be noted that the direction and extent of these changes could differ by geographic region).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 649px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image12-1-1.png\" alt=\"Chart shows cyclical carbon dioxide levels from 800,000 years ago until today.\" width=\"649\" height=\"406\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.4: This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, illustrates how atmospheric CO\u2082 has fluctuated over time and increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. The graph also shows that since 800,000ya (and before) atmospheric CO\u2082 has never exceeded 300 parts per million (ppm). In 1950 it was 310ppm. Today atmospheric CO\u2082 has spiked to over 410 ppm. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.nasa.gov\/evidence\/\">CO\u2082 increase since the Industrial Revolution<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/\">NASA<\/a> is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a> and is used within <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/multimedia\/guidelines\/index.html\">NASA guidelines on re-use<\/a>. Original from Luthi, D., et al.. 2008; Etheridge, D.M., et al. 2010; Vostok ice core data\/J.R. Petit et al.; NOAA Mauna Loa CO<a href=\"https:\/\/climate.nasa.gov\/evidence\/\">\u2082<\/a> record..<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Both local and global climatic\/environmental changes have been used to understand factors affecting our evolution (DeHeinzelin et al. 1999; Kingston 2007). Environmental change acts as an important factor regarding the onset of several important hominin traits seen in early hominins and discussed in this chapter. Namely, the environment has been interpreted as the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">the driving force behind the evolution of bipedalism,<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">the reason for change and variation in early hominin diets, and<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">the diversification of multiple early hominin species.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There are numerous hypotheses regarding how climate has driven and continues to drive human evolution. Here, we will focus on just three popular hypotheses.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Savannah Hypothesis (or Aridity Hypothesis)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The hypothesis:<\/strong> This popular theory suggests that the expansion of the savannah (or less densely forested, drier environments) forced early hominins from an <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1314\"><strong>arboreal<\/strong> <\/a> lifestyle (one living in trees) to a terrestrial one where bipedalism was a more efficient form of locomotion (Figure 9.5). It was first proposed by Darwin (1871) and supported by anthropologists like Raymond Dart (1925). However, this idea was supported by little fossil or paleoenvironmental evidence and was later refined as the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1318\">Aridity Hypothesis<\/a><\/strong>. This hypothesis states that the long-term <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1316\">aridification<\/a><\/strong> and, thereby, expansion of savannah biomes were drivers in diversification in early hominin evolution (deMenocal 2004; deMenocal and Bloemendal 1995). It advocates for periods of accelerated aridification leading to early hominin speciation events.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 647px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image46.png\" alt=\"Photograph showing a dry, open savannah environment.\" width=\"647\" height=\"486\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.5: The African savannah grew during early hominin evolution. This may have forced early hominins from an arboreal lifestyle to a terrestrial one, where bipedalism was a more efficient form of locomotion. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:African_savannah_@_Masai_Mara_(21308330314).jpg\">African savannah @ Masai Mara (21308330314)<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/people\/132394214@N04\">Leo Li<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/legalcode\">CC BY 2.0 License<\/a>.<br \/><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The evidence:<\/strong> While early bipedal hominins are often associated with wetter, more closed environments (i.e., not the Savannah Hypothesis), both marine and terrestrial records seem to support general cooling, drying conditions, with isotopic records indicating an increase in grasslands (i.e., colder and wetter climatic conditions) between 8 mya and 6 mya across the African continent (Cerling et al. 2011). This can be contrasted with later climatic changes derived from aeolian dust records (sediments transported to the site of interest by wind), which demonstrate increases in seasonal rainfall between 3 mya and 2.6 mya, 1.8 mya and 1.6 mya, and 1.2 mya and 0.8 mya (deMenocal 2004; deMenocal and Bloemendal 1995).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Interpretation(s):<\/strong> Despite a relatively scarce early hominin record, it is clear that two important factors occur around the time period in which we see increasing aridity. The first factor is the diversification of taxa, where high morphological variation between specimens has led to the naming of multiple hominin genera and species. The second factor is the observation that the earliest hominin fossils appear to have traits associated with bipedalism and are dated to around the drying period (as based on isotopic records). Some have argued that it is more accurately a combination of bipedalism and arboreal locomotion, which will be discussed later. However, the local environments in which these early specimens are found (as based on the faunal assemblages) do not appear to have been dry.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Turnover Pulse Hypothesis<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The hypothesis:<\/strong> In 1985, paleontologist Elisabeth Vbra noticed that in periods of extreme and rapid climate change, <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1326\"><strong>ungulates<\/strong><\/a> (hoofed mammals of various kinds) that had generalized diets fared better than those with specialized diets (Vrba 1988, 1998). <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1322\"><strong>Specialist<\/strong><\/a> eaters faced extinction at greater rates than their <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1320\">generalist<\/a> <\/strong>counterparts because they were unable to adapt to new environments (Vrba 2000). Thus, periods with extreme climate change would be associated with high <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1324\"><strong>faunal turnover<\/strong><\/a>: that is, the extinction of many species and the speciation, diversification, and migration of many others to occupy various niches.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The evidence:<\/strong> The onset of the<strong> <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1400\">Quaternary Ice Age<\/a><\/strong>, between 2.5 mya and 3 mya, brought extreme global, cyclical <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1328\"><strong>interglacial<\/strong> <\/a> and <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1330\"><strong>glacial<\/strong><\/a> periods (warmer, wetter periods with less ice at the poles, and colder, drier periods with more ice near the poles). Faunal evidence from the Turkana basin in East Africa indicates multiple instances of faunal turnover and extinction events, in which global climatic change resulted in changes from closed\/forested to open\/grassier habitats at single sites (Behrensmeyer et al. 1997; Bobe and Behrensmeyer 2004). Similarly, work in the Cape Floristic Belt of South Africa shows that extreme changes in climate play a role in extinction and migration in ungulates. While this theory was originally developed for ungulates, its proponents have argued that it can be applied to hominins as well. However, the link between climate and speciation is only vaguely understood (Faith and Behrensmeyer 2013).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Interpretation(s):<\/strong> While the evidence of rapid faunal turnover among ungulates during this time period appears clear, there is still some debate around its usefulness as applied to the paleoanthropological record. Specialist hominin species do appear to exist for long periods of time during this time period, yet it is also true that <em>Homo<\/em>, a generalist genus with a varied and adaptable diet, ultimately survives the majority of these fluctuations, and the specialists appear to go extinct.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Variability Selection Hypothesis<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The hypothesis: <\/strong>This hypothesis was first articulated by paleoanthropologist Richard Potts (1998). It links the high amount of climatic variability over the last 7 million years to both behavioral and morphological changes. Unlike previous notions, this hypothesis states that hominin evolution does not respond to habitat-specific changes or to specific aridity or moisture trends. Instead, long-term environmental unpredictability over time and space influenced morphological and behavioral adaptations that would help hominins survive, regardless of environmental context (Potts 1998, 2013). The Variability Selection Hypothesis states that hominin groups would experience varying degrees of natural selection due to continually changing environments and potential group isolation. This would allow certain groups to develop genetic combinations that would increase their ability to survive in shifting environments. These populations would then have a genetic advantage over others that were forced into habitat-specific adaptations (Potts 2013).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>The evidence:<\/strong> The evidence for this theory is similar to that for the Turnover Pulse Hypothesis: large climatic variability and higher survivability of generalists versus specialists. However, this hypothesis accommodates for larger time-scales of extinction and survival events.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Interpretation(s):<\/strong> In this way, the Variability Selection Hypothesis allows for a more flexible interpretation of the evolution of bipedalism in hominins and a more fluid interpretation of the Turnover Pulse Hypothesis, where species turnover is meant to be more rapid. In some ways, this hypothesis accommodates both environmental data and our interpretations of an evolution toward greater variability among species and the survivability of generalists.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Derived Adaptations: Bipedalism<br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The unique form of locomotion exhibited by modern humans, called <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1332\">obligate bipedalism<\/a><\/strong>, is important in distinguishing our species from the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1334\"><strong>extant<\/strong><\/a> (living) great apes. The ability to walk habitually upright is thus considered one of the defining attributes of the hominin lineage. We also differ from other animals that walk bipedally (such as kangaroos) in that we do not have a tail to balance us as we move.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The origin of bipedalism in hominins has been debated in paleoanthropology, but at present there are two main theories:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">early hominins initially lived in trees, but increasingly started living on the ground, so we were a product of an arboreal last common ancestor (LCA) or,<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">our LCA was a terrestrial quadrupedal knuckle-walking species, more similar to extant chimpanzees.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Most research supports the first theory of an arboreal LCA based on skeletal morphology of early hominin genera that demonstrate adaptations for climbing but not for knuckle-walking. This would mean that both humans and chimpanzees can be considered \u201cderived\u201d in terms of locomotion since chimpanzees would have independently evolved knuckle-walking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There are many current ideas regarding selective pressures that would lead to early hominins adapting upright posture and locomotion. Many of these selective pressures, as we have seen in the previous section, coincide with a shift in environmental conditions, supported by paleoenvironmental data. In general, however, it appears that, like extant great apes, early hominins thrived in forested regions with dense tree coverage, which would indicate an arboreal lifestyle. As the environmental conditions changed and a savannah\/grassland environment became more widespread, the tree cover would become less dense, scattered, and sparse such that bipedalism would become more important.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There are several proposed selective pressures for bipedalism:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>E<\/strong><strong>nergy conservation:<\/strong> Modern bipedal humans conserve more energy than extant chimpanzees, which are predominantly knuckle-walking quadrupeds when walking over land. While chimpanzees, for instance, are faster than humans terrestrially, they expend large amounts of energy being so. Adaptations to bipedalism include \u201cstacking\u201d the majority of the weight of the body over a small area around the center of gravity (i.e., the head is above the chest, which is above the pelvis, which is over the knees, which are above the feet). This reduces the amount of muscle needed to be engaged during locomotion to \u201cpull us up\u201d and allows us to travel longer distances expending far less energy.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>T<\/strong><strong>hermoregulation:<\/strong> Less surface area (i.e., only the head and shoulders) is exposed to direct sunlight during the hottest parts of the day (i.e., midday). This means that the body has less need to employ additional \u201ccooling\u201d mechanisms such as sweating, which additionally means less water loss.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Bipedalism <\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">(Freeing of Hands)<\/span><strong>: <\/strong>This method of locomotion freed up our ancestors\u2019 hands such that they could more easily gather food and carry tools or infants. This further enabled the use of hands for more specialized adaptations associated with the manufacturing and use of tools.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">These selective pressures are not mutually exclusive. Bipedality could have evolved from a combination of these selective pressures, in ways that increased the chances of early hominin survival.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Skeletal Adaptations for Bipedalism<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 405px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image10-1.png\" alt=\"A full human skeleton and gorilla skeleton standing in upright positions next to each other.\" width=\"405\" height=\"452\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.6: Compared to gorillas (right) and other apes, humans (left) have highly specialized adaptations to facilitate bipedal locomotion. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Primatenskelett-drawing.jpg\">Skeleton of human (1) and gorilla (2), unnaturally sketched<\/a> by unknown from Brehms Tierleben, Small Edition 1927 is in the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_domain\">public domain<\/a>.<br \/><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Humans have highly specialized adaptations to facilitate obligate bipedalism (Figure 9.6). Many of these adaptations occur within the soft tissue of the body (e.g., muscles and tendons). However, when analyzing the paleoanthropological record for evidence of the emergence of bipedalism, all that remains is the fossilized bone. Interpretations of locomotion are therefore often based on comparative analyses between fossil remains and the skeletons of extant primates with known locomotor behaviors. These adaptations occur throughout the skeleton and are summarized in Figure 9.7.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The majority of these adaptations occur in the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1336\"><strong>postcranium<\/strong><\/a> and are outlined in Figure 9.7. In general, these adaptations allow for greater stability and strength in the lower limb, by allowing for more shock absorption, for a larger surface area for muscle attachment, and for the \u201cstacking\u201d of the skeleton directly over the center of gravity to reduce energy needed to be kept upright. These adaptations often mean less flexibility in areas such as the knee and foot.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">However, these adaptations come at a cost. Evolving from a nonobligate bipedal ancestor means that the adaptations we have are evolutionary compromises. For instance, the valgus knee (angle at the knee) is an essential adaptation to balance the body weight above the ankle during bipedal locomotion. However, the strain and shock absorption at an angled knee eventually takes its toll. For example, runners often experience joint pain. Similarly, the long neck of the femur absorbs stress and accommodates for a larger pelvis, but it is a weak point, resulting in hip replacements being commonplace among the elderly, especially in cases where the bone additionally weakens through osteoporosis. Finally, the S-shaped curve in our spine allows us to stand upright, relative to the more curved C-shaped spine of an LCA. Yet the weaknesses in the curves can lead to pinching of nerves and back pain. Since many of these problems primarily are only seen in old age, they can potentially be seen as an evolutionary compromise.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Despite relatively few postcranial fragments, the fossil record in early hominins indicates a complex pattern of emergence of bipedalism. Key features, such as a more anteriorly placed foramen magnum, are argued to be seen even in the earliest discovered hominins, indicating an upright posture (Dart 1925). Some early species appear to have a mix of ancestral (arboreal) and derived (bipedal) traits, which indicates a mixed locomotion and a more <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1402\">mosaic evolution<\/a><\/strong> of the trait. Some early hominins appear to, for instance, have bowl-shaped pelvises (hip bones) and angled femurs suitable for bipedalism but also have retained an opposable <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1338\">hallux<\/a><\/strong> (big toe) or curved fingers and longer arms (for arboreal locomotion). These mixed morphologies may indicate that earlier hominins were not fully obligate bipeds and thus thrived in mosaic environments. <\/span><span style=\"color: #000000\">Yet the associations between postcranial and the more diagnostic cranial fossils and bones are not always clear, muddying our understanding of the specific species to which fossils belong (Grine et al. 2022).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">It is also worth noting that, while not directly related to bipedalism per se, other postcranial adaptations are evident in the hominin fossil record from some of the earlier hominins. For instance, the hand and finger morphologies of many of the earliest hominins indicate adaptations consistent with arboreality. These include longer hands, more curved metacarpals and phalanges (long bones in the hand and fingers, respectively), and a shorter, relatively weaker thumb. This allows for gripping onto curved surfaces during locomotion. The earliest hominins appear to have mixed morphologies for both bipedalism and arborealism. However, among Australopiths (members of the genus, Australopithecus), there are indications for greater reliance on bipedalism as the primary form of locomotion. Similarly, adaptations consistent with tool manufacture (shorter fingers and a longer, more robust thumb, in contrast to the features associated with arborealism) have been argued to appear before the genus <em>Homo<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<div align=\"left\">\n<table class=\"grid\">\n<caption>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: left\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Figure 9.7: Skeletal comparisons between modern humans (obligate bipeds) and nonobligate bipeds (e.g., chimpanzees). Credit: <a class=\"rId34\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/chapter-9-early-hominins-2\/\">Skeletal comparisons between modern humans and <\/a><a class=\"rId35\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/chapter-9-early-hominins-2\/\">nonobligate<\/a><a class=\"rId36\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/chapter\/chapter-9-early-hominins-2\/\"> bipeds (Figure 9.6)<\/a> original to <a class=\"rId37\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu\/explorationsbioanth\/\">Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId38\" style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\"><strong>Region<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\"><strong>Feature<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\"><strong>Obligate Biped (H. sapiens)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\"><strong>Nonobligate Biped<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Position of the foramen magnum<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">Positioned inferiorly (immediately under the cranium) so that the head rests on top of the vertebral column for balance and support (head is perpendicular to the ground).<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">Posteriorly positioned (to the back of the cranium). Head is positioned parallel to the ground.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Body proportions<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">Shorter upper limb (not used for locomotion).<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">Longer upper limbs (used for locomotion).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Spinal curvature<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">S-curve due to pressure exerted on the spine from bipedalism (lumbar lordosis).<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">C-curve.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Vertebrae<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">Robust lumbar (lower-back) vertebrae (for shock absorbance and weight bearing). Lower back is more flexible than that of apes as the hips and trunk swivel when walking (weight transmission).<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">Gracile lumbar vertebrae compared to those of modern humans.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Pelvis<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">Shorter, broader, bowl-shaped pelvis (for support); very robust. Broad sacrum with large sacroiliac joint surfaces.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">Longer, flatter, elongated ilia; more narrow and gracile; narrower sacrum; relatively smaller sacroiliac joint surface.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Lower limb<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">In general, longer, more robust lower limbs and more stable, larger joints.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Large femoral head and longer neck (absorbs more stress and increases the mechanical advantage).<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Valgus knee, in which the angle of the knee positions it over the ankle and keeps the center of gravity balanced over the stance leg during stride cycle (shock absorbance).<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Distal tibia (lower leg) of humans has a large medial malleolus for stability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">In general, smaller, more gracile limbs with more flexible joints.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">Femoral neck is smaller in comparison to modern humans and shorter.<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">The legs bow outward, and there is no valgus angle of the knee (no \u201cknock knees\u201d).<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\">The distal tibia in chimpanzees is trapezoid (wider anteriorly) for climbing and allows more flexibility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 97.998px\">Post<\/p>\n<p>cranium<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 106.992px\">Foot<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 366.992px\">Rigid, robust foot, without a midtarsal break.<\/p>\n<p>Nonopposable and large, robust big toe (for push off while walking) and large heel for shock absorbance.<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 310px\">Flexible foot, midtarsal break present (which allows primates to lift their heels independently from their feet), opposable big toe for grasping.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\" style=\"background: var(--lightblue)\">\n<h2>Special Topic: Fear of Snakes \u2014 A Cultural or Biological Adaptation?<\/h2>\n<figure id=\"attachment_680\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-680\" style=\"width: 393px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img class=\"wp-image-680\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorationsversiontwo\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2023\/06\/snake-2319873_1920.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"393\" height=\"262\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-680\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/snake-adder-serpent-reptile-animal-2319873\/<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>It is suggested that primates have three major predators: raptors, felines, and snakes; however, many studies show that of these carnivores, snakes were one of the first that mammals had to contend with alongside dinosaurs, as felines and raptors evolved at a much slower pace than their reptilian competition. Herpetologists trace the evolution of constricting snakes to about 100 million years ago, and by the time mammals arrived around 75 million years ago, constrictors were\u00a0 already well established as a formidable threat (Greene, 2017). \u00a0Both co-existed for millennia and each sustained selective pressures requiring them to evolve specific traits to survive. When venomous snakes eventually emerged 55 to 65 million years ago, they posed yet an additional threat to proto-primates as they required less distance for the predator to kill (2017). Alongside camouflage and silent movement techniques, it was the development of the snake\u2019s hollow fangs through which to deliver venom that was most transformative to primate evolution. As such, primates evolved their pre-conscious attention, and visual acuity to cope with this new threat; therefore, while snakes were adapting morphologically to feed themselves, they were unwittingly teaching proto-primates valuable lessons in predator detection and reacting appropriately in order to survive.<\/p>\n<p>In a 2009 Harvard University study, Lynne A. Isbell hypothesizes that envenoming snakes are linked to being directly responsible for the origins of the evolving complex brains and superior visual capacity in the lineage of anthropoids leading to humans (Isbell, 2009). Forward-facing eyes for binocular vision, depth perception, enhanced visual acuity, stereoscopic and trichromatic colour vision, all traits necessary for snake detection; and the quick motor responses from the primate\u2019s fight, flight, or freeze defence mechanism to circumvent a snake\u2019s squeeze or bite. Numerous laboratory studies show that humans and primates both sense and visually detect snakes more rapidly than other threatening stimuli (Van Le et al., 2013). These experiments show that snakes elicited the strongest, fastest responses (Van Le et al., 2013). This is known as \u2018Snake Detection Theory\u2019 and is the evolution of the primate\u2019s complex brain, visual acuity, and rapid motor responses towards snakes in its environment that are the adaptations needed to live successfully as arboreal beings. It is not fortuitous then, that primates that never coexisted with venomous snakes, such as lemurs in Madagascar, have less visual acuity, better olfaction and smaller brains. Within Isbell\u2019s work, a collaborative study by a group of neuroscientists tested this hypothesis and found that, indeed, there is higher neural firing and activity in multiple areas of the primate brain, notably in the pulvinar, a region\u00a0 responsible for visual attention and oculomotor behaviour (Isbell, L., 2009).<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 316px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/9\/96\/Ra_slays_Apep_%28tomb_scene_in_Deir_el-Medina%29%28improved_contrast%29.png\/250px-Ra_slays_Apep_%28tomb_scene_in_Deir_el-Medina%29%28improved_contrast%29.png\" alt=\"File:Ra slays Apep (tomb scene in Deir el-Medina)(improved contrast).png\" width=\"316\" height=\"236\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?search=snake+in+ancient+egypt&amp;title=Special%3AMediaSearch&amp;type=image<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Today, the fear of snakes is widespread in humans, often shown through avoidance and disgust. A study in <em data-start=\"197\" data-end=\"244\">The Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine<\/em> notes that snakes are over-hunted and excluded from conservation efforts worldwide (Cer\u00edaco, 2012). While cultural factors shape our sentiments, instinct also plays a role\u2014such as the developed avoidance behaviors toward threats like snakes. This blend of instinct and cultural influence is not only seen in behavior but also deeply embedded in the stories we tell. Many cultures depict mythological snakes as harbingers of death or chaos. In the Bible, Satan becomes a snake to tempt Eve. Norse mythology features J\u00f6rmungandr, the world serpent who signals the apocalypse. Egyptian myth tells of Apophis, who battles the sun god Ra nightly. Though sources vary, these myths consistently portray snakes as threats. As such, the widespread fear of snakes may reflect both evolutionary and cultural influences. Understood as an adaptive response inherited from primate ancestors\u2014who developed avoidance behaviors toward potentially dangerous stimuli\u2014and reinforced through myths and religious narratives, the enduring presence of snakes as potent figures of fear across human societies and primate groups highlights the complex intertwining of instinct and cultural meaning in shaping human behavior.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Early Hominins: Sahelanthropus and Orrorin<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">We see evidence for bipedalism in some of the earliest fossil hominins, dated from within our estimates of our divergence from chimpanzees. These hominins, however, also indicate evidence for arboreal locomotion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The earliest dated hominin find (between 6 mya and 7 mya, based on radiometric dating of volcanic tufts) has been argued to come from Chad and is named <strong><em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em> <\/strong>(Figure 9.8; Brunet et al. 1995). The initial discovery was made in 2001 by Ahounta Djimdoumalbaye and announced in <em>Nature<\/em> in 2002 by a team led by French paleontologist Michel Brunet. The find has a small cranial capacity (360 cc) and smaller canines than those in extant great apes, though they are larger and pointier than those in humans. This might imply that, over evolutionary time, the need for display and dominance among males has reduced, as has our sexual dimorphism. A short cranial base and a foramen magnum that is more humanlike in positioning have been argued to indicate upright walking.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-288\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.82.jpg\" alt=\"Four views of a beige-colored skull are seen against a black background.\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.8: Sahelanthropus tchadensis exhibits a set of derived features, including a long, low cranium; a small, ape-sized braincase; and relatively reduced prognathism. Credit: aa <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Sahelanthropus%20tchadensis\/TM%20266-01-060-1\">Sahelanthropus tchadensis: TM 266-01-060-1 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Sahelanthropus%20tchadensis\/TM%20266-01-060-1\">Sahelanthropus tchadensis: TM 266-01-060-1 posterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Sahelanthropus%20tchadensis\/TM%20266-01-060-1\">Sahelanthropus tchadensis: TM 266-01-060-1 inferior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; and d <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Sahelanthropus%20tchadensis\/TM%20266-01-060-1\">Sahelanthropus tchadensis: TM 266-01-060-1 lateral left view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Initially, the inclusion of <em>Sahelanthropus<\/em> in the hominin family was debated by researchers, since the evidence for bipedalism is based on cranial evidence alone, which is not as convincing as postcranial evidence. Yet, a femur (thigh bone) and ulnae (upper arm bones) thought to belong to <em>Sahelanthropus<\/em> was discovered in 2001 (although not published until 2022). These bones may support the idea that the hominin was in fact a terrestrial biped with arboreal capabilities and behaviors (Daver et al. 2022).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Orrorin tugenensis<\/em><\/strong> (Orrorin meaning \u201coriginal man\u201d), dated to between 6 mya and 5.7 mya, was discovered near Tugen Hills in Kenya in 2000. Smaller <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1340\">cheek teeth<\/a><\/strong> (molars and premolars) than those in even more recent hominins, thick enamel, and reduced, but apelike, canines characterize this species. This is the first species that clearly indicates adaptations for bipedal locomotion, with fragmentary leg, arm, and finger bones having been found but few cranial remains. One of the most important elements discovered was a proximal femur, BAR 1002'00. The femur is the thigh bone, and the proximal part is that which articulates with the pelvis; this is very important for studying posture and locomotion. This femur indicates that <em>Ororrin<\/em> was bipedal, and recent studies suggest that it walked in a similar way to later <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1404\">Pliocene<\/a><\/strong> hominins. Some have argued that features of the finger bones suggest potential tool-making capabilities, although many researchers argue that these features are also consistent with climbing.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">Early Hominins: The Genus <em>Ardipithecus<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Another genus, <em>Ardipithecus<\/em>, is argued to be represented by at least two species: <em>Ardipithecus (Ar.) ramidus <\/em>and <em>Ar. kadabba<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Ardipithecus ramidus<\/em><\/strong> (\u201cramid\u201d means root in the Afar language) is currently the best-known of the earliest hominins (Figure 9.9). Unlike <em>Sahelanthropus<\/em> and<em> Orrorin<\/em>, this species has a large sample size of over 110 specimens from Aramis alone. Dated to 4.4 mya, <em>Ar. ramidus<\/em> was found in Ethiopia (in the Middle Awash region and in Gona). This species was announced in 1994 by American palaeoanthropologist Tim White, based on a partial female skeleton nicknamed \u201cArdi\u201d (ARA-VP-6\/500; White et al. 1994). Ardi demonstrates a mosaic of ancestral and derived characteristics in the postcrania. For instance, she had an opposable big toe (hallux), similar to chimpanzees (i.e., more ancestral), which could have aided in climbing trees effectively. However, the pelvis and hip show that she could walk upright (i.e., it is derived), supporting her hominin status. A small brain (300 cc to 350 cc), midfacial projection, and slight prognathism show retained ancestral cranial features, but the cheek bones are less flared and robust than in later hominins.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-2\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-2\" style=\"width: 706px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-289\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.9-scaled-1.jpg\" alt=\"Skull cast and partial skeleton with photographs of some bones and line drawings of others.\" width=\"706\" height=\"453\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-2\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.9a and b: Researchers believe that Ardipithecus ramidus was able to walk upright, although not as efficiently as later humans. It possessed the musculature required for tree climbing, and while moving quadrupedally, it likely placed weight on the palms of the hands rather than on the knuckles. Credit: a. <a class=\"rId61\" href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/ardipithecus-ramidus-skull-BH-039\">Ardipithecus ramidus Skull<\/a> by <a class=\"rId62\" href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a class=\"rId63\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId64\" href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/product\/ardipithecus-ramidus-skull-BH-039\">Artist\u2019s rendition of \u201cArdi\u201d skeleton<\/a> by <a class=\"rId65\" href=\"https:\/\/boneclones.com\/\">\u00a9BoneClones<\/a> is used by permission and available here under a <a class=\"rId66\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Ardipithecus kadabba<\/em><\/strong> (the species name means \u201coldest ancestor\u201d in the Afar language) is known from localities on the western margin of the Middle Awash region, the same locality where <em>Ar. ramidus<\/em> has been found. Specimens include mandibular fragments and isolated teeth as well as a few postcranial elements from the Asa Koma (5.5 mya to 5.77 mya) and Kuseralee Members (5.2 mya), well-dated and understood (but temporally separate) volcanic layers in East Africa. This species was discovered in 1997 by paleoanthropologist Dr. Yohannes Haile-Selassie. Originally these specimens were referred to as a subspecies of <em>Ar. ramidus<\/em>. In 2002, six teeth were discovered at Asa Koma and the dental-wear patterns confirmed that this was a distinct species, named <em>Ar. kadabba,<\/em> in 2004. One of the postcranial remains recovered included a 5.2 million-year-old toe bone that demonstrated features that are associated with toeing off (pushing off the ground with the big toe leaving last) during walking, a characteristic unique to bipedal walkers. However, the toe bone was found in the Kuseralee Member, and therefore some doubt has been cast by researchers about its association with the teeth from the Asa Koma Member.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Derived Adaptations: Early Hominin Dention<\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">The Importance of Teeth<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Teeth are abundant in the fossil record, primarily because they are already highly mineralized as they are forming, far more so than even bone. Because of this, teeth preserve readily. And, because they preserve readily, they are well-studied and better understood than many skeletal elements. In the sparse hominin (and primate) fossil record, teeth are, in some cases, all we have.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Teeth also reveal a lot about the individual from whom they came. We can tell what they evolved to eat, to which other species they may be closely related, and even, to some extent, the level of sexual dimorphism, or general variability, within a given species. This is powerful information that can be contained in a single tooth. With a little more observation, the wearing patterns on a tooth can tell us about the diet of the individual in the weeks leading up to its death. Furthermore, the way in which a tooth is formed, and the timing of formation, can reveal information about changes in diet (or even mobility) over infancy and childhood, using isotopic analyses. When it comes to our earliest hominin relatives, this information is vital for understanding how they lived.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The purpose of comparing different hominin species is to better understand the functional morphology as it applies to dentition. In this, we mean that the morphology of the teeth or masticatory system (which includes jaws) can reveal something about the way in which they were used and, therefore, the kinds of foods these hominins ate. When comparing the features of hominin groups, it is worth considering modern analogues (i.e., animals with which to compare) to make more appropriate assumptions about diet. In this way, hominin dentition is often compared with that of chimpanzees and gorillas (our close ape relatives), as well as with that of modern humans.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The most divergent group, however, is humans. Humans around the world have incredibly varied diets. Among hunter-gatherers, it can vary from a honey- and plant-rich diet, as seen in the Hadza in Tanzania, to a diet almost entirely reliant on animal fat and protein, as seen in Inuits in polar regions of the world. We are therefore considered generalists, more general than the largely <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1342\"><strong>frugivorous<\/strong><\/a> (fruit-eating) chimpanzee or the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1344\"><strong>folivorous<\/strong><\/a> (foliage-eating) gorilla, as discussed in Chapter 5.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">One way in which all humans are similar is our reliance on the processing of our food. We cut up and tear meat with tools using our hands, instead of using our front teeth (incisors and canines). We smash and grind up hard seeds, instead of crushing them with our hind teeth (molars). This means that, unlike our ape relatives, we can rely more on developing tools to navigate our complex and varied diets. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">(We could say)<\/span> Our brain, therefore, is our primary masticatory organ. Evolutionarily, our teeth have reduced in size and our faces are flatter, or more <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1346\">orthognathic<\/a>, <\/strong>partially in response to our increased reliance on our hands and brain to process food. Similarly, a reduction in teeth and a more generalist dental morphology could also indicate an increase in softer and more variable foods, such as the inclusion of more meat. The link has been made between some of the earliest evidence for stone tool manufacture, the earliest members of our genus, and the features that we associate with these specimens.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">General Dental Trends in Early Hominins<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Several trends are visible in the dentition of early hominins. However, all tend to have the same <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1348\"><strong>dental formula<\/strong><\/a>. The dental formula tells us how many of each tooth type are present in each quadrant of the mouth. Going from the front of the mouth, this includes the square, flat <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1160\">incisors<\/a><\/strong>; the pointy <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1166\">canines<\/a><\/strong>; the small, flatter <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1350\"><strong>premolars<\/strong><\/a>; and the larger hind <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1164\">molars<\/a><\/strong>. In many primates, from Old World monkeys to great apes, the typical dental formula is 2:1:2:3. This means that if we divide the mouth into quadrants, each has two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and three molars. The eight teeth per quadrant total 32 teeth in all (although some humans have fewer teeth due to the absence of their wisdom teeth, or third molars).<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image24.png\" alt=\"Anterior view of the lower face of a person showing their teeth.\" width=\"380\" height=\"253\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.10: In humans, our canines are often a similar size to our incisors. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Adult_human_teeth.jpg\">Adult human teeth<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.genusfotografen.se\/\">Genusfotografen<\/a> (Tomas Gunnarsson) through <a href=\"https:\/\/wikimedia.se\/\">Wikimedia Sverige<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The morphology of the individual teeth is where we see the most change. Among primates, large incisors are associated with food procurement or preparation (such as biting small fruits), while small incisors indicate a diet that may contain small seeds or leaves (where the preparation is primarily in the back of the mouth). Most hominins have relatively large, flat, vertically aligned incisors that <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1396\">occlude<\/a> <\/strong>(touch) relatively well, forming a \u201cbite.\u201d This differs from, for instance, the orangutan, whose teeth stick out (i.e.<em>,<\/em> are <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1352\"><strong>procumbent<\/strong><\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">While the teeth are often aligned with diet, the canines may be misleading in that regard. We tend to associate pointy, large canines with the ripping required for meat, and the reduction (or, in some animals, the absence) of canines as indicative of herbivorous diets. In humans, our canines are often a similar size to our incisors and therefore considered <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1398\">incisiform<\/a><\/strong> (Figure 9.10). However, our closest relatives all have very long, pointy canines, particularly on their upper dentition. This is true even for the gorilla, which lives almost exclusively on plants. The canines in these instances reveal more about social structure and sexual dimorphism than diet, as large canines often signal dominance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Early on in human evolution, we see a reduction in canine size. <em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em> and <em>Orrorin tugenensis<\/em> both have smaller canines than those in extant great apes, yet the canines are still larger and pointier than those in humans or more recent hominins.\u00a0In <em>Ardipithecus ramidus<\/em>, there is no obvious difference between male and female canine size, yet they are still slightly larger and pointier than in modern humans. This implies a less sexually dimorphic social structure in the earlier hominins relative to modern-day chimpanzees and gorillas.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Along with a reduction in canine size is the reduction or elimination of a canine <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1172\">diastema<\/a>:<\/strong> a gap between the teeth on the mandible that allows room for elongated teeth on the maxilla to \u201cfit\u201d in the mouth. Absence of a diastema is an excellent indication of a reduction in canine size. In animals with large canines (such as baboons), there is also often a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1354\"><strong>honing P3<\/strong><\/a>, where the first premolar (also known as P3 for evolutionary reasons) is triangular in shape, \u201csharpened\u201d by the extended canine from the upper dentition. This is also seen in some early hominins: <em>Ardipithecus<\/em>, for example, has small canines that are almost the same height as its incisors, although still larger than those in recent hominins.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The hind dentition, such as the bicuspid (two cusped) premolars or the much larger molars, are also highly indicative of a generalist diet in hominins. Among the earliest hominins, the molars are larger than we see in our genus, increasing in size to the back of the mouth and angled in such a way from the much smaller anterior dentition as to give these hominins a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1356\"><strong>parabolic<\/strong><\/a> (V-shaped) dental arch. This differs from our living relatives and some early hominins, such as <em>Sahelanthropus<\/em>, whose molars and premolars are relatively parallel between the left and right sides of the mouth, creating a U-shape.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Among more recent early hominins, the molars are larger than those in the earliest hominins and far larger than those in our own genus, <em>Homo.<\/em> Large, short molars with thick <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1358\"><strong>enamel<\/strong><\/a> allowed our early cousins to grind fibrous, coarse foods, such as sedges, which require plenty of chewing. This is further evidenced in the low <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1176\">cusps<\/a>,<\/strong> or ridges, on the teeth, which are ideal for chewing. In our genus, the hind dentition is far smaller than in these early hominins. Our teeth also have medium-size cusps, which allow for both efficient grinding and tearing\/shearing meats.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Understanding the dental morphology has allowed researchers to extrapolate very specific behaviors of early hominins. It is worth noting that while teeth preserve well and are abundant, a slew of other morphological traits additionally provide evidence for many of these hypotheses. Yet there are some traits that are ambiguous. For instance, while there are definitely high levels of sexual dimorphism in <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, discussed in the next section, the canine teeth are reduced in size, implying that while canines may be useful indicators for sexual dimorphism, it is also worth considering other evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Special Topic: Contested Species<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Many named species are highly debated and argued to have specimens associated with a more variable <em>Au. afarensis <\/em>or <em>Au. anamensis<\/em> species. Sometimes these specimens are dated to times when, or found in places in which, there are \u201cgaps\u201d in the palaeoanthropological record. These are argued to represent chronospecies or variants of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>. However, it is possible that, with more discoveries, the distinct species types will hold.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Australopithecus bahrelghazali<\/em><\/strong> is dated to within the time period of <em>Au. afarensi<\/em>s (3.6 mya; Brunet et al. 1995) and was the first Australopithecine to be discovered in Chad in central Africa. Researchers argue that the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1360\">holotype<\/a><\/strong>, whom discoverers have named \u201cAbel,\u201d falls under the range of variation of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> and therefore that <em>A. bahrelghazali<\/em> does not fall into a new species (Lebatard et al. 2008). If \u201cAbel\u201d is a member of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, the geographic range of the species would be greatly extended.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">On a different note, <strong><em>Australopithecus <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>deyiremada<\/em><\/strong> (meaning \u201cclose relative\u201d in the Ethiopian language of Afar) is dated to 3.5 mya to 3.3 mya and is based on fossil mandible bones discovered in 2011 in Woranso-Mille (in the Afar region of Ethiopia) by Yohannes Haile-Selassie, an Ethiopian paleoanthropologist (Haile-Selassie et al. 2019). The discovery indicated, in contrast to <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, smaller teeth with thicker enamel (potentially suggesting a harder diet) as well as a larger mandible and more projecting cheekbones. This find may be evidence that more than one closely related hominin species occupied the same region at the same temporal period (Haile-Selassie et al. 2015; Spoor 2015) or that other <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> specimens have been incorrectly designated. However, others have argued that this species has been prematurely identified and that more evidence is needed before splitting the taxa, since the variation appears subtle and may be due to slightly different niche occupations between populations over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Australopithecus garhi<\/em><\/strong> is another species found in the Middle Awash region of Ethiopia. It is currently dated to 2.5 mya (younger than <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>). Researchers have suggested it fills in a much-needed temporal \u201cgap\u201d between hominin finds in the region, with some anatomical differences, such as a relatively large cranial capacity (450 cc) and larger hind dentition than seen in other gracile Australopithecines. Similarly, the species has been argued to have longer hind limbs than <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, although it was still able to move arboreally (Asfaw et al. 1999). However, this species is not well documented or understood and is based on only several fossil specimens. More astonishingly, crude stone tools resembling Oldowan (which will be described later) have been found in association with <em>Au. garhi<\/em>. While lacking some of the features of the Oldowan, this is one of the earliest technologies found in direct association with a hominin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Kenyanthopus<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> platyops<\/em><\/strong> (the name \u201cplatyops\u201d refers to its flatter-faced appearance) is a highly contested genus\/species designation of a specimen (KNM-WT 40000) from Lake Turkana in Kenya, discovered by Maeve Leakey in 1999 (Figure 9.11). Dated to between 3.5 mya and 3.2 mya, some have suggested this specimen is an <em>Australopithecus<\/em>, perhaps even <em>Au.<\/em> <em>afarensis<\/em> (with a brain size which is difficult to determine, yet appears small), while still others have placed this specimen in <em>Homo <\/em>(small dentition and flat-orthognathic face). While taxonomic placing of this species is quite divided, the discoverers have argued that this species is ancestral to <em>Homo<\/em>, in particular to <em>Homo <\/em><em>ruldolfensis<\/em> (Leakey et al. 2001). Some researchers have additionally associated the earliest tool finds from Lomekwi, Kenya, temporally (3.3 mya) and in close geographic proximity to this specimen.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-3\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-3\" style=\"width: 579px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-291 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.11.jpg\" alt=\"Four views of an ancient skull are shown on a black background.\" width=\"579\" height=\"579\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-3\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.11: This specimen, KNM WT 40000 (Kenyanthopus platyops), has small detention, a small brain case, and a relatively flat face. Its genus\/species designation remains contested. Credit: a. <a class=\"rId76\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"><em>Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId77\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"> KNM WT 40000 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId78\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId79\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId80\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId81\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"><em>Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId82\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"> KNM WT 40000 superior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId83\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId84\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId85\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c. <a class=\"rId86\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"><em>Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId87\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"> KNM WT 40000 lateral left view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId88\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId89\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId90\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; d. <a class=\"rId91\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"><em>Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId92\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Kenyanthropus%20platyops\/KNM%20WT%2040000\"> KNM WT 40000 inferior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId93\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId94\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId95\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The Genus <em>Australopithecus<\/em><br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The Australopithecines are a diverse group of hominins, comprising various species. <em>Australopithecus<\/em> is the given group or genus name. It stems from the Latin word <em>Australo<\/em>, meaning \u201csouthern,\u201d and the Greek word <em>pithecus,<\/em> meaning \u201cape.\u201d Within this section, we will outline these differing species\u2019 geological and temporal distributions across Africa, unique derived and\/or shared traits, and importance in the fossil record.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 381px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image37-2.png\" alt=\"A skull has a pronounced sagittal crest, flaring cheekbones, and large hind teeth.\" width=\"381\" height=\"585\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.12: Robust Australopithecines such as Paranthropus boisei had large molars and chewing muscles. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Paranthropus_boisei_skull.jpg\">Paranthropus boisei skull<\/a> by Durova is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Between 3 mya and 1 mya, there seems to be differences in dietary strategy between different species of hominins designated as Australopithecines. A pattern of larger posterior dentition (even relative to the incisors and canines in the front of the mouth), thick enamel, and cranial evidence for extremely large chewing muscles is far more pronounced in a group known as the robust australopithecines. This pattern is extreme<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">ly<\/span> relative to their earlier contemporaries or predecessors, the gracile australopithecines<strong>,<\/strong> and is certainly larger than those seen in early <em>Homo<\/em>, which emerged during this time. This pattern of incredibly large hind dentition (and very small anterior dentition) has led people to refer to robust australopithecines as <strong>megadont<\/strong> hominins (Figure 9.12).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Because of these differences, this section has been divided into \u201cgracile\u201d and \u201crobust\u201d Australopithecines, highlighting the morphological differences between the two groups (which many researchers have designated as separate genera: <em>Australopithecus<\/em> and <em>Paranthropus<\/em>, respectively) and then focusing on the individual species. It is worth noting, however, that not all researchers accept these clades as biologically or genetically distinct, with some researchers insisting that the relative gracile and robust features found in these species are due to parallel evolutionary events toward similar dietary niches.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Despite this genus\u2019 ancestral traits and small cranial capacity, all members show evidence of bipedal locomotion. It is generally accepted that <em>Australopithecus <\/em>species display varying degrees of arborealism along with bipedality.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Gracile Australopithecines<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">This section describes individual species from across Africa. These species are called \u201c<strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1406\">gracile<\/a> <\/strong>australopithecines\u201d because of their smaller and less robust features compared to the divergent \u201c<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1408\"><strong>robust<\/strong><\/a>\u201d group. Numerous Australopithecine species have been named, but some are only based on a handful of fossil finds, whose designations are controversial.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em><span style=\"color: #000000\">East African Australopithecines<\/span><\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">East African Australopithecines are found throughout the EARS, and they include the earliest species associated with this genus. Numerous fossil-yielding sites, such as Olduvai, Turkana, and Laetoli, have excellent, datable stratigraphy, owing to the layers of <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1362\"><strong>volcanic tufts<\/strong> <\/a> that have accumulated over millions of years. These tufts may be dated using absolute dating techniques, such as Potassium-Argon dating (described in Chapter 7). This means that it is possible to know a relatively refined date for any fossil if the <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1364\"><strong>context<\/strong> <\/a>\u00a0 of that find is known. Similarly, comparisons between the faunal assemblages of these stratigraphic layers have allowed researchers to chronologically identify environmental changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 313px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image20-1-1.png\" alt=\"Occlusal view of an Au. anamensis mandible, with relatively large teeth, including canines.\" width=\"313\" height=\"313\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.13: As seen in this mandible of KNM-KP 29281, Australopithecus anamensis had relatively large canine teeth. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20anamensis\/KNM-KP%2029281\">Australopithecus anamensis: KNM-KP 29281 occlusal view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The earliest known Australopithecine is dated to 4.2 mya to 3.8 mya. <strong><em>Australopithecus anamensis<\/em><\/strong> (after \u201cAnam,\u201d meaning \u201clake\u201d from the Turkana region in Kenya; Leakey et al. 1995; Patterson and Howells 1967) is currently found from sites in the Turkana region (Kenya) and Middle Awash (Ethiopia; Figure 9.13). Recently, a 2019 find from Ethiopia, named MRD, after Miro Dora where it was found, was discovered by an Ethiopian herder named Ali Bereino. It is one of the most complete cranial finds of this species (Ward et al. 1999). A small brain size (370 cc), relatively large canines, projecting cheekbones, and earholes show more ancestral features as compared to those of more recent Australopithecines. The most important element discovered with this species is a fragment of a tibia (shinbone), which demonstrates features associated with weight transfer during bipedal walking. Similarly, the earliest found hominin femur belongs to this species. Ancestral traits in the upper limb (such as the humerus) indicate some retained arboreal locomotion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Some researchers suggest that <em>Au. anamensis<\/em> is an intermediate form of the chronospecies that becomes <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, evolving from <em>Ar. ramidus<\/em>. However, this is debated, with other researchers suggesting morphological similarities and affinities with more recent species instead. Almost 100 specimens, representing over 20 individuals, have been found to date (Leakey et al. 1995; McHenry 2009; Ward et al. 1999).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Au. afarensis<\/em><\/strong> is one of the oldest and most well-known australopithecine species and consists of a large number of fossil remains. <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> (which means \u201cfrom the Afar region\u201d) is dated to between 2.9 mya and 3.9 mya and is found in sites all along the EARS system, in Tanzania, Kenya, and Ethiopia (Figure 9.14). The most famous individual from this species is a partial female skeleton discovered in Hadar (Ethiopia), later nicknamed \u201cLucy,\u201d after the Beatles\u2019 song \u201cLucy in the Sky with Diamonds,\u201d which was played in celebration of the find (Johanson et al. 1978; Kimbel and Delezene 2009). This skeleton was found in 1974 by Donald Johanson and dates to approximately 3.2 mya. In addition, in 2002 a juvenile of the species was found by Zeresenay Alemseged and given the name \u201cSelam\u201d (meaning \u201cpeace,\u201d DIK 1-1), though it is popularly known as \u201cLucy\u2019s Child\u201d or as the \u201cDikika Child\u201d (Alemseged et al. 2006). Similarly, the \u201cLaetoli Footprints\u201d (discussed in Chapter 7; Hay and Leakey 1982; Leakey and Hay 1979) have drawn much attention.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-4\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-4\" style=\"width: 643px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-294 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.14.jpg\" alt=\"Two images of life-like reconstructions of female and male Au. afarensis.\" width=\"643\" height=\"322\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-4\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.14 a-b: Artistic reconstructions of Australopithecus afarensis by artist John Gurche. Female \u201cLucy\u201d is left and a male is on the right. Credit: a. <a class=\"rId106\" href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\">Australopithecus afarensis, \u201cLucy,\u201d adult female. Reconstruction based on AL-288-1 by artist John Gurche, front view close-up<\/a> by <a class=\"rId107\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: \u201cReconstructed Faces: What Does It Mean to Be Human?\u201d] is <a class=\"rId108\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\/\">copyrighted and used for educational and noncommercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId109\" href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\">Australopithecus afarensis, adult male. Reconstruction based on <\/a><a class=\"rId110\" href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\">AL444-2<\/a><a class=\"rId111\" href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\"> by John Gurche<\/a> by <a class=\"rId112\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: \u201cReconstructed Faces: What Does It Mean to Be Human?\u201d] is <a class=\"rId113\" href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\/\">copyrighted and used for educational and noncommercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure style=\"width: 320px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image40.png\" alt=\"A partial skeleton includes bones of the cranium, mandible, and postcranium.\" width=\"320\" height=\"772\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.15: The humanlike femoral neck, valgus knee, and bowl-shaped hip seen in the \u201cLucy\u201d skeleton indicates that Australopithecus afarensis was bipedal. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Lucy_blackbg.jpg\">Lucy blackbg<\/a> [AL 288-1, Australopithecus afarensis, cast from Museum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris] by 120 is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 3.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The canines and molars of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> are reduced relative to great apes but are larger than those found in modern humans (indicative of a generalist diet); in addition, <em>Au. afarensis <\/em>has a <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1366\"><strong>prognathic<\/strong> <\/a> face (the face below the eyes juts anteriorly) and robust facial features that indicate relatively strong chewing musculature (compared with <em>Homo<\/em>) but which are less extreme than in <em>Paranthropus<\/em>. Despite a reduction in canine size in this species, large overall size variation indicates high levels of sexual dimorphism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Skeletal evidence indicates that this species was bipedal, as its pelvis and lower limb demonstrate a humanlike femoral neck, valgus knee, and bowl-shaped hip (Figure 9.15). Further evidence of bipedalism is seen in the Laetoli Footprints, which are associated with <em data-start=\"92\" data-end=\"107\">Au. afarensis<\/em> (Chapter 7).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Although not found in direct association with stone tools, potential evidence for cut marks on bones, found at Dikika, and dated to 3.39 mya indicates a possible temporal\/ geographic overlap between meat eating, tool use, and this species. However, this evidence is fiercely debated. Others have associated the cut marks with the earliest tool finds from Lomekwi, Kenya, temporally (3.3 mya) and in close geographic proximity to this species.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 class=\"import-Normal\"><em><span style=\"color: #000000\">South African Australopithecines<\/span><\/em><\/h4>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Since the discovery of the Taung Child, there have been numerous Australopithecine discoveries from the region known as \u201cThe Cradle of Humankind,\u201d which was recently given UNESCO World Heritage Site status as \u201cThe Fossil Hominid Sites of South Africa.\u201d The limestone caves found in the Cradle allow for the excellent preservation of fossils. Past animals navigating the landscape and falling into cave openings, or caves used as dens by carnivores, led to the accumulation of deposits over millions of years. Many of the hominin fossils, encased in <strong>breccia<\/strong> (hard, calcareous sedimentary rock), are recently exposed from limestone quarries mined in the previous century. This means that extracting fossils requires excellent and detailed exposed work, often by a team of skilled technicians.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">While these sites have historically been difficult to date, with mixed assemblages accumulated over large time periods, advances in techniques such as uranium-series dating have allowed for greater accuracy. Historically, the excellent faunal record from East Africa has been used to compare sites based on <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1368\"><strong>relative dating<\/strong>,<\/a> whereby environmental and faunal changes and extinction events allow us to know which hominin finds are relatively younger or older than others.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The discovery of the Taung Child in 1924 (discussed in the Special Topic box \u201cThe Taung Child\u201d below) shifted the focus of palaeoanthropological research from Europe to Africa, although acceptance of this shift was slow (Broom 1947; Dart 1925). The species to which it is assigned, <strong><em>Australopithecus africanus<\/em><\/strong> (name meaning \u201cSouthern Ape of Africa\u201d), is currently dated to between 3.3 mya and 2.1 mya (Pickering and Kramers 2010), with discoveries from Sterkfontein, Taung, Makapansgat, and Gladysvale in South Africa (Figure 9.16). A relatively large brain (400 cc to 500 cc), small canines without an associated diastema, and more rounded cranium and smaller teeth than <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> indicate some derived traits. Similarly, the postcranial remains (in particular, the pelvis) indicate bipedalism. However, the sloping face and curved phalanges (indicative of retained arboreal locomotor abilities) show some ancestral features. Although not in direct association with stone tools, a 2015 study noted that the trabecular bone morphology of the hand was consistent with forceful tool manufacture and use, suggesting potential early tool abilities.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 570px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image19-1.png\" alt=\"A life-like reconstruction of the face of Australopithecus africanus, smiling in anterior view.\" width=\"570\" height=\"570\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.16: An artistic reconstruction of Australopithecus africanus by John Gurche. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\">Australopithecus africanus. Reconstruction based on STS 5 by John Gurche <\/a>by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: \u201cReconstructed Faces: What Does It Mean to Be Human?] is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\/\">copyrighted and used for educational and noncommercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Another famous <em>Au. africanus<\/em> skull (the skull of \u201cMrs. Ples\u201d) was previously attributed to <em>Plesianthropus transvaalensis<\/em><em>, <\/em>meaning \u201cnear human from the Transvaal,\u201d the old name for Gauteng Province, South Africa (Broom 1947, 1950). The name was shortened by contemporary journalists to \u201cPles\u201d (Figure 9.17). Due to the prevailing mores of the time, the assumed female found herself married, at least in name, and has become widely known as \u201cMrs. Ples.\u201d It was later reassigned to <em>Au. africanus<\/em> and is now argued by some to be a young male rather than an adult female cranium (Thackeray 2000, Thackeray et al. 2002).<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-5\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-5\" style=\"width: 548px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-297 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.17.jpg\" alt=\"Four views of an ancient skull are shown on a black background.\" width=\"548\" height=\"548\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-5\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.17: The \u201cMrs. Ples\u201d brain case is small in size (like apes) but its face is less prognathic; its foramen magnum is positioned more like a modern human than an African apes. Credit: a. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Sts%205\">Australopithecus africanus Sts 5 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Sts%205\">Australopithecus africanus Sts 5 posterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Sts%205\">Australopithecus africanus Sts 5 superior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; and d. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Sts%205\">Australopithecus africanus Sts 5 lateral right view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">In 2008, nine-year-old Matthew Berger, son of paleoanthropologist Lee Berger, noted a clavicle bone in some leftover mining breccia in the Malapa Fossil Site (South Africa). After rigorous studies, the species, <strong><em>Australopithecus sediba<\/em><\/strong> (meaning \u201cfountain\u201d or \u201cwellspring\u201d in the South African language of Sesotho), was named in 2010 (Figure 9.18; Berger et al. 2010). The first type specimen belongs to a juvenile male, Karabo (MH1), but the species is known from at least six partial skeletons, from infants through adults. These specimens are currently dated to 1.97 mya (Dirks et al. 2010). The discoverers have argued that <em>Au. sediba<\/em> shows mosaic features between <em>Au. africanus<\/em> and the genus, <em>Homo<\/em>, which potentially indicates a transitional species, although this is heavily debated. These features include a small brain size (<em>Australopithecus<\/em>-like; 420 cc to 450 cc) but gracile mandible and small teeth (<em>Homo<\/em>-like). Similarly, the postcranial skeletons are also said to have mosaic features: scientists have interpreted this mixture of traits (such as a robust ankle but evidence for an arch in the foot) as a transitional phase between a body previously adapted to arborealism (particularly in evidence from the bones of the wrist) to one that adapted to bipedal ground walking. Some researchers have argued that <em>Au. sediba<\/em> shows a modern hand morphology (shorter fingers and a longer thumb), indicating that adaptations to tool manufacture and use may be present in this species.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 531px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image17-1.png\" alt=\"A beige-colored skull with no mandible on a black background has some missing teeth.\" width=\"531\" height=\"400\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.18: Australopithecus sediba shows mosaic features between Au. africanus and Homo. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Australopithecus_sediba.JPG\">Australopithecus sediba<\/a>, photo by Brett Eloff courtesy <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/User:Profberger\">Profberger<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_the_Witwatersrand\">Wits University<\/a>, is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/legalcode\">CC BY-SA 4.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Another famous Australopithecine find from South Africa is that of the nearly complete skeleton now known as \u201cLittle Foot\u201d (Clarke 1998, 2013). Little Foot (StW 573) is potentially the earliest dated South African hominin fossil, dating to 3.7 mya, based on radiostopic techniques, although some argue that it is younger than 3 mya (Pickering and Kramers 2010). The name is jokingly in contrast to the cryptid species \u201cbigfoot\u201d and is named because the initial discovery of four ankle bones indicated bipedality. Little Foot was discovered by Ron Clarke in 1994, when he came across the ankle bones while sorting through monkey fossils in the University of Witwatersrand collections (Clarke and Tobias 1995). He asked Stephen Motsumi and Nkwane Molefe to identify the known records of the fossils, which allowed them to find the rest of the specimen within just days of searching the Sterkfontein Caves\u2019 Silberberg Grotto.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The discoverers of Little Foot insist that other fossil finds, previously identified as <em>Au. Africanus<\/em>, be placed in this new species based on shared ancestral traits with older East African Australopithecines (Clarke and Kuman 2019). These include features such as a relatively large brain size (408 cc), robust zygomatic arch, and a flatter midface. Furthermore, the discoverers have argued that the heavy anterior dental wear patterns, relatively large anterior dentition, and smaller hind dentition of this specimen more closely resemble that of <em>Au. anamensis<\/em> or <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>. It has thus been placed in the species <strong><em>Australopithecus prometheus<\/em><\/strong>. This species name refers to a previously defunct taxon named by Raymond Dart. The species designation was, through analyzing Little Foot, revived by Ron Clarke, who insists that many other fossil hominin specimens have prematurely been placed into <em>Au. africanus<\/em>. Others say that it is more likely that <em>Au. africanus<\/em> is a more variable species and not representative of two distinct species.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Paranthropus<\/em> \u201cRobust\u201d Australopithecines<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">In the robust australopithecines, the specialized nature of the teeth and masticatory system, such as flaring zygomatic arches (cheekbones), accommodate very large temporalis (chewing) muscles. These features also include a large, broad, dish-shaped face and and a large mandible with extremely large posterior dentition (referred to as megadonts) and hyper-thick enamel (Kimbel 2015; Lee-Thorp 2011; Wood 2010). Research has revolved around the shared adaptations of these \u201crobust\u201d australopithecines, linking their morphologies to a diet of hard and\/or tough foods (Brain 1967; Rak 1988). Some argued that the diet of the robust australopithecines was so specific that any change in environment would have accelerated their extinction. The generalist nature of the teeth of the gracile australopithecines, and of early <em>Homo<\/em>, would have made them more capable of adapting to environmental change. However, some have suggested that the features of the robust australopithecines might have developed as an effective response to what are known as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1370\"><strong>fallback <\/strong><strong>foods<\/strong><\/a> in hard times rather than indicating a lack of adaptability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">There are currently three widely accepted robust australopithecus or, <em>Paranthropus<\/em>, species: <em>P. aethiopic<\/em><em>us<\/em>, which has more ancestral traits, and <em>P. boisei and P. robustus<\/em>, which are more derived in their features (Strait et al. 1997; Wood and Schroer 2017). These three species have been grouped together by a majority of scholars as a single genus as they share more derived features (are more closely related to each other; or, in other words, are <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1372\"><strong>monophyletic<\/strong><\/a>) than the other australopithecines (Grine 1988; Hlazo 2015; Strait et al. 1997; Wood 2010 ). While researchers have mostly agreed to use the umbrella term <em>Paranthropus<\/em>, there are those who disagree (Constantino and Wood 2004, 2007; Wood 2010).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">As a collective, this genus spans 2.7 mya to 1.0 mya, although the dates of the individual species differ. The earliest of the Paranthropus species, <strong><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/strong>, is dated to between 2.7 mya and 2.3 mya and currently found in Tanzania, Kenya, and Ethiopia in the EARS system (Figure 9.19; Constantino and Wood 2007; Hlazo 2015; Kimbel 2015; Walker et al. 1986; White 1988). It is well known because of one specimen known as the \u201cBlack Skull\u201d (KNM\u2013WT 17000), so called because of the mineral manganese that stained it black during fossilization (Kimbel 2015). As with all robust Australopithecines, <em>P. aethiopicus<\/em> has the shared derived traits of large, flat premolars and molars; large, flaring zygomatic arches for accommodating large chewing muscles (the temporalis muscle); a sagittal crest (ridge on the top of the skull) for increased muscle attachment of the chewing muscles to the skull; and a robust mandible and supraorbital torus (brow ridge). However, only a few teeth have been found. A proximal tibia indicates bipedality and similar body size to <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>. In recent years, researchers have discovered and assigned a proximal tibia and juvenile cranium (L.338y-6) to the species (Wood and Boyle 2016).<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-6\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-6\" style=\"width: 666px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-299 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.19.jpg\" alt=\"Five views of a beige partial skull on a black background.\" width=\"666\" height=\"444\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-6\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.19: The \u201cBlack Skull\u201d (Paranthropus aethiopicus) had a large sagittal crest and large, flared zygomatic arches that indicate it had large chewing muscles and a powerful biting force. Credit: a. <a class=\"rId156\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId157\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\">: KNM-WT 17000 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId158\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId159\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId160\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId161\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId162\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\">: KNM-WT 17000 lateral right view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId163\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId164\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId165\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c. <a class=\"rId166\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId167\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\">: KNM-WT 17000 superior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId168\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId169\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId170\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; d. <a class=\"rId171\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId172\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\">: KNM-WT 17000 posterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId173\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId174\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId175\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; e. <a class=\"rId176\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId177\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/paranthropus%20aethiopicus\/KNM-WT%2017000\">: KNM-WT 17000 inferior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId178\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId179\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId180\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">First attributed as <em>Zinjanthropus boisei<\/em> (with the first discovery going by the nickname \u201cZinj\u201d or sometimes \u201cNutcracker Man\u201d), <strong><em>Paranthropus boisei<\/em><\/strong> was discovered in 1959 by Mary Leakey (see Figure 9.20 and 9.21; Hay 1990; Leakey 1959). This \u201crobust\u201d australopith species is distributed across countries in East Africa at sites such as Kenya (Koobi Fora, West Turkana, and Chesowanja), Malawi (Malema-Chiwondo), Tanzania (Olduvai Gorge and Peninj), and Ethiopia (Omo River Basin and Konso). The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1374\">hypodigm<\/a><\/strong>, sample of fossils whose features define the group, has been found by researchers to date to roughly 2.4 mya to 1.4 mya. Due to the nature of its exaggerated, larger, and more robust features, <em>P. boisei <\/em>has been termed <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1376\"><strong>hyper-robust<\/strong><\/a>\u2014that is, even more heavily built than other robust species, with very large, flat posterior dentition (Kimbel 2015). Tools dated to 2.5 mya in Ethiopia have been argued to possibly belong to this species. Despite the cranial features of <em>P. boisei<\/em> indicating a tough diet of tubers, nuts, and seeds, isotopes indicate a diet high in C4 foods (e.g., grasses, such as sedges). Another famous specimen from this species is the Peninj mandible from Tanzania, found in 1964 by Kimoya Kimeu.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 557px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image14-1.png\" alt=\"Life-like reconstruction of Paranthropus boisei.\" width=\"557\" height=\"557\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.20: Artistic reconstruction of a Paranthropus boisei, male, by John Gurche. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/multimedia\/slideshows\/reconstructed-faces\">Paranthropus boisei, male. Reconstruction based on OH 5 and KNM-ER 406 by John Gurche<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/\">the Smithsonian<\/a> [exhibit: \u201cReconstructed Faces: What Does It Mean to Be Human?\u201d] is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.edu\/termsofuse\/\">copyrighted and used for educational and noncommercial purposes as outlined by the Smithsonian<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-7\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-7\" style=\"width: 565px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-301 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.21.jpg\" alt=\"Three views of an ancient skull are shown on a black background.\" width=\"565\" height=\"565\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-7\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.21: \u201cNutcracker Man\u201d (Paranthropus boisei) had hyper-robust features including very large dentition, flaring zygomatic arches, a broad concave face. It had a powerful and extremely efficient chewing force. Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20boisei\/OH%205\">Paranthropus boisei: OH 5 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20boisei\/OH%205\">Paranthropus boisei: OH 5 inferior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c. <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20boisei\/OH%205\">Paranthropus boisei: OH 5 posterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/strong> was the first taxon to be discovered within the genus in Kromdraai B by a schoolboy named Gert Terblanche; subsequent fossil discoveries were made by researcher Robert Broom in 1938 (Figure 9.22; Broom 1938a, 1938b, 1950), with the holotype specimen TM 1517 (Broom 1938a, 1938b, 1950; Hlazo 2018). <em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em> dates approximately from 2.0 mya to 1 mya and is the only taxon from the genus to be discovered in South Africa. Several of these fossils are fragmentary in nature, distorted, and not well preserved because they have been recovered from quarry breccia using explosives. <em>P. robustus<\/em> features are neither as \u201chyper-robust\u201d as <em>P. boisei<\/em> nor as ancestral as <em>P. aethiopicus<\/em>; instead, they have been described as being less derived, more general features that are shared with both East African species (e.g., the sagittal crest and zygomatic flaring; Rak 1983; Walker and Leakey 1988). Enamel hypoplasia is also common in this species, possibly because of instability in the development of large, thick-enameled dentition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_304-8\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-304-8\" style=\"width: 572px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-302 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.22.jpg\" alt=\"Four views of a beige-colored skull are shown on a black background.\" width=\"572\" height=\"619\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-304-8\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.22: SK 48, a Paranthropus robustus specimen, had less derived, more general features that were not as robust as P. boisei and not as ancestral as P. aethiopicus. Credit: a. <a class=\"rId208\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\"><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId209\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\">: SK 48 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId210\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId211\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId212\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId213\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\"><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId214\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\">: SK 48 superior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId215\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId216\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId217\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; c. <a class=\"rId218\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\"><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId219\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\">: SK 48 inferior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId220\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId221\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId222\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; d. <a class=\"rId223\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\"><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId224\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Paranthropus%20robustus\/SK%2048\">: SK 48 lateral left view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId225\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId226\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId227\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">Comparisons between Gracile and Robust Australopiths<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Comparisons between gracile and robust australopithecines may indicate different phylogenetic groupings or parallel evolution in several species. In general, the robust australopithecines have large temporalis (chewing) muscles, as indicated by flaring zygomatic arches, sagittal crests, and robust mandibles (jawbones). Their hind dentition is large (megadont), with low cusps and thick enamel. Within the gracile australopithecines, researchers have debated the relatedness of the species, or even whether these species should be lumped together to represent more variable or polytypic species. Often researchers will attempt to draw chronospecific trajectories, with one taxon said to evolve into another over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Special Topic: The Taung Child<\/span><\/h2>\n<figure id=\"attachment_303\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-303\" style=\"width: 570px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img class=\"wp-image-303 \" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/9.23.jpg\" alt=\"An ancient skull in anterior and lateral views. One view shows an imprint of the brain.\" width=\"570\" height=\"285\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-303\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.23: The Taung Child has a nearly complete face, mandible, and partial endocranial cast. Credit: a. <em>A<\/em><a class=\"rId230\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Taung%201\"><em>ustralopithecus africanus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId231\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Taung%201\">: Taung 1 anterior view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId232\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId233\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId234\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>; b. <a class=\"rId235\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Taung%201\"><em>australopithecus africanus<\/em><\/a><a class=\"rId236\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/boneviewer\/Australopithecus%20africanus\/Taung%201\">: Taung 1 lateral right view<\/a> by \u00a9<a class=\"rId237\" href=\"https:\/\/www.efossils.org\/\">eFossils<\/a> is under a <a class=\"rId238\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/2.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 License<\/a> and is <a class=\"rId239\" href=\"https:\/\/efossils.org\/page\/frequently-asked-questions\">used as outlined by eFossils<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">The well-known fossil of a juvenile <em>Australopithecine<\/em>, the \u201cTaung Child,\u201d was the first early hominin evidence ever discovered and was the first to demonstrate our common human heritage in Africa (Figure 9.23; Dart 1925). The tiny facial skeleton and natural endocast were discovered in 1924 by a local quarryman in the North West Province in South Africa and were painstakingly removed from the surrounding cement-like breccia by Raymond Dart using his wife\u2019s knitting needles. When first shared with the scientific community in 1925, it was discounted as being nothing more than a young monkey of some kind. Prevailing biases of the time made it too difficult to contemplate that this small-brained hominin could have anything to do with our own history. The fact that it was discovered in Africa simply served to strengthen this bias.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000\">Early Tool Use and Technology<br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">Early Stone Age Technology (ESA)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1378\">Early Stone Age (ESA)<\/a><\/strong> marks the beginning of recognizable technology made by our human ancestors. Stone-tool (or <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1380\"><strong>lithic<\/strong><\/a>) technology is defined by the fracturing of rocks and the manufacture of tools through a process called <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1382\"> <strong>knapping<\/strong><\/a>. The Stone Age lasted for more than 3 million years and is broken up into chronological periods called the Early (ESA), Middle (MSA), and Later Stone Ages (LSA). Each period is further broken up into a different <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1384\">techno-complex<\/a><\/strong>, a term encompassing multiple <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1386\">assemblages<\/a><\/strong> (collections of artifacts) that share similar traits in terms of artifact production and morphology. The ESA spanned the largest technological time period of human innovation from over 3 million years ago to around 300,000 years ago and is associated almost entirely with hominin species prior to modern <em>Homo sapiens. <\/em>As the ESA advanced, stone tool makers (known as <a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1390\"><strong>knappers<\/strong><\/a>) began to change the ways they detached <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1388\">flakes<\/a><\/strong> and eventually were able to shape artifacts into functional tools. These advances in technology go together with the developments in human evolution and cognition, dispersal of populations across the African continent and the world, and climatic changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">In order to understand the ESA, it is important to consider that not all assemblages are exactly the same within each techno-complex: one can have multiple phases and traditions at different sites (Lombard et al. 2012). However, there is an overarching commonality between them. Within stone tool assemblages, both flakes or <strong>cores<\/strong> (the rocks from which flakes are removed) are used as tools.<a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1392\"> <strong>Large Cutting Tools (LCTs)<\/strong><\/a> are tools that are shaped to have functional edges. It is important to note that the information presented here is a small fraction of what is known about the ESA, and there are ongoing debates and discoveries within archaeology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Currently, the oldest-known stone tools, which form the techno-complex the Lomekwian, date to 3.3 mya (Harmand et al. 2015; Toth 1985). They were found at a site called Lomekwi 3 in Kenya. This techno-complex is the most recently defined and pushed back the oldest-known date for lithic technology. There is only one known site thus far and, due to the age of the site, it is associated with species prior to <em>Homo<\/em>, such as <em>Kenyanthropus platyops.<\/em> Flakes were produced through indirect percussion, whereby the knappers held a rock and hit it against another rock resting on the ground. The pieces are very chunky and do not display the same fracture patterns seen in later techno-complexes. Lomekwian knappers likely aimed to get a sharp-edged piece on a flake, which would have been functional, although the specific function is currently unknown.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Stone tool use, however, is not only understood through the direct discovery of the tools. Cut marks on fossilized animal bones may illuminate the functionality of stone tools. In one controversial study in 2010, researchers argued that cut marks on a pair of animal bones from Dikika (Ethiopia), dated to 3.4 mya, were from stone tools. The discoverers suggested that they be more securely associated, temporally, with <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>. However, others have noted that these marks are consistent with teeth marks from crocodiles and other carnivores.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 324px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/71\/2025\/07\/image29-1.png\" alt=\"A technical line drawing of an Oldowan chopper.\" width=\"324\" height=\"275\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 9.24: Some scholars believe that some genera explored in this chapter were capable of producing more complex stone tools (Oldowan). Credit: <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Olduwan_Industry_Chopper_2.jpeg\">Olduwan Industry Chopper 2<\/a> by Emmyanne29 is under a <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/legalcode\">CC0 1.0 License<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The Oldowan techno-complex is far more established in the scientific literature (Leakey 1971). It is called the <strong><a class=\"glossary-term\" aria-haspopup=\"dialog\" aria-describedby=\"definition\" href=\"#term_1678_1394\">Oldowan<\/a><\/strong> because it was originally discovered in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, but the oldest assemblage is from Gona in Ethiopia, dated to 2.6 mya (Semaw 2000). The techno-complex is defined as a core and flake industry. Like the Lomekwian, there was an aim to get sharp-edged flakes, but this was achieved through a different production method. Knappers were able to actively hold or manipulate the core being knapped, which they could directly hit using a hammerstone. This technique is known as free-hand percussion, and it demonstrates an understanding of fracture mechanics. It has long been argued that the Oldowan hominins were skillful in tool manufacture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Because Oldowan knapping requires skill, earlier researchers have attributed these tools to members of our genus, <em>Homo<\/em>. However, some have argued that these tools are in more direct association with hominins in the genera described in this chapter (Figure 9.24).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">Invisible Tool Manufacture and Use<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The vast majority of our understanding of these early hominins comes from fossils and reconstructed paleoenvironments. It is only from 3 mya when we can start \u201clooking into their minds\u201d and lifestyles by analyzing their manufacture and use of stone tools. However, the vast majority of tool use in primates (and, one can argue, in humans) is not with durable materials like stone. All of our extant great ape relatives have been observed using sticks, leaves, and other materials for some secondary purpose (to wade across rivers, to \u201cfish\u201d for termites, or to absorb water for drinking). It is possible that the majority of early hominin tool use and manufacture may be invisible to us because of this preservation bias.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Summary<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The fossil record of our earliest hominin relatives has allowed paleoanthropologists to unpack some of the mysteries of our evolution. We now know that traits associated with bipedalism evolved before other \u201chuman-like\u201d traits, even though the first hominins were still very capable of arboreal locomotion. We also know that, for much of this time, hominin taxa were diverse in the way they looked and what they ate, and they were widely distributed across the African continent. And we know that the environments in which these hominins lived underwent many changes over this time during several warming and cooling phases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Yet this knowledge has opened up many new mysteries. We still need to better differentiate some taxa. In addition, there are ongoing debates about why certain traits evolved and what they meant for the extinction of some of our relatives (like the robust australopiths). The capabilities of these early hominins with respect to tool use and manufacture is also still uncertain.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hominin Species Summaries<br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">7 mya to 6 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Chad<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The initial discovery, made in 2001.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">360 cc average<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Smaller than in extant great apes; larger and pointier than in humans. Canines worn at the tips.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A short cranial base and a foramen magnum (hole in which the spinal cord enters the cranium) that is more humanlike in positioning; has been argued to indicate upright walking.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Currently little published postcranial material.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table4-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table4-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The extent to which this hominin was bipedal is currently heavily debated. If so, it would indicate an arboreal bipedal ancestor of hominins, not a knuckle-walker like chimpanzees.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Orrorin tugenensis<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">6 mya to 5.7 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Tugen Hills (Kenya)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Original discovery in 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Smaller cheek teeth (molars and premolars) than even more recent hominins (i.e., derived), thick enamel, and reduced, but apelike, canines.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Not many found<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Fragmentary leg, arm, and finger bones have been found. Indicates bipedal locomotion.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Potential toolmaking capability based on hand morphology, but nothing found directly.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table5-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table5-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">This is the earliest species that clearly indicates adaptations for bipedal locomotion.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Ardipithecus kadabba<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">5.2 mya to 5.8 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Middle Awash (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Discovered by Yohannes Haile-Selassie in 1997.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Larger hind dentition than in modern chimpanzees. Thick enamel and larger canines than in later hominins.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A large hallux (big toe) bone indicates a bipedal \u201cpush off.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table6-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table6-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Faunal evidence indicates a mixed grassland\/woodland environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Ardipithecus ramidus<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">4.4 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Middle Awash region and Gona (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A partial female skeleton nicknamed \u201cArdi\u201d (ARA-VP-6\/500) (found in 1994).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">300 cc to 350 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Little differences between the canines of males and females (small sexual dimorphism).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Midfacial projection, slightly prognathic. Cheekbones less flared and robust than in later hominins.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Ardi demonstrates a mosaic of ancestral and derived characteristics in the postcrania. For instance, an opposable big toe similar to chimpanzees (i.e., more ancestral), which could have aided in climbing trees effectively. However, the pelvis and hip show that she could walk upright (i.e., it is derived), supporting her hominin status.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">None directly associated<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table7-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table7-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Over 110 specimens from Aramis<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus anamensis<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">4.2 mya to 3.8 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Turkana region (Kenya); Middle Awash (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A 2019 find from Ethiopia, named MRD.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">370 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Relatively large canines compared with more recent Australopithecines.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Projecting cheekbones and ancestral earholes.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lower limb bones (tibia and femur) indicate bipedality; arboreal features in upper limb bones (humerus) found.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table8-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table8-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Almost 100 specimens, representing over 20 individuals, have been found to date.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.9 mya to 2.9 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Afar Region, Omo, Maka, Fejej, and Belohdelie (Ethiopia); Laetoli (Tanzania); Koobi Fora (Kenya)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lucy (discovery: 1974), Selam (Dikika Child, discovery: 2000), Laetoli Footprints (discovery: 1976).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">380 cc to 430 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Reduced canines and molars relative to great apes but larger than in modern humans.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Prognathic face, facial features indicate relatively strong chewing musculature (compared with <em>Homo<\/em>) but less extreme than in <em>Paranthropus<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Clear evidence for bipedalism from lower limb postcranial bones. Laetoli Footprints indicate humanlike walking. Dikika Child bones indicate retained ancestral arboreal traits in the postcrania.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">None directly, but close in age and proximity to controversial cut marks at Dikika and early tools in Lomekwi.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table9-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table9-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Au. afarensis<\/em> is one of the oldest and most well-known australopithecine species and consists of a large number of fossil remains.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus bahrelghazali<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.6 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Chad<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">\u201cAbel,\u201d the holotype (discovery: 1995).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table10-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table10-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Arguably within range of variation of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus prometheus<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.7 mya (debated)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Sterkfontein (South Africa)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">\u201cLittle Foot\u201d (StW 573) (discovery: 1994)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">408 cc (Little Foot estimate)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Heavy anterior dental wear patterns, relatively large anterior dentition and smaller hind dentition, similar to <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Relatively larger brain size, robust zygomatic arch, and a flatter midface.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The initial discovery of four ankle bones indicated bipedality.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table11-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table11-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Highly debated new species designation.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus <\/em><em>deyiremada<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.5 mya to 3.3 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Woranso-Mille (Afar region, Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">First fossil mandible bones were discovered in 2011 in the Afar region of Ethiopia by Yohannes Haile-Selassie.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Smaller teeth with thicker enamel than seen in <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, with a potentially hardier diet.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Larger mandible and more projecting cheekbones than in <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table12-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table12-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Contested species designation; arguably a member of <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Kenyanthopus<\/em><em> platyops<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.5 mya to 3.2 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lake Turkana (Kenya)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">KNM\u2013WT 40000 (discovered 1999)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Difficult to determine but appears within the range of <em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Small molars\/dentition (<em>Homo<\/em>-like characteristic)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Flatter (i.e., orthognathic) face<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Some have associated the earliest tool finds from Lomekwi, Kenya, temporally (3.3 mya) and in close geographic proximity to this species\/specimen.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table13-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table13-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Taxonomic placing of this species is quite divided. The discoverers have argued that this species is ancestral to <em>Homo<\/em>, in particular to <em>Homo <\/em><em>ruldolfensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus africanus<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">3.3 mya to 2.1 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Sterkfontein, Taung, Makapansgat, Gladysvale (South Africa)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Taung Child (discovery in 1994), \u201cMrs. Ples\u201d (discover in 1947), Little Foot (arguable; discovery in 1994).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">400 cc to 500 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Smaller teeth (derived) relative to <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>. Small canines with no diastema.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A rounder skull compared with <em>Au. afarensis<\/em> in East Africa. A sloping face (ancestral).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Similar postcranial evidence for bipedal locomotion (derived pelvis) with retained arboreal locomotion, e.g., curved phalanges (fingers), as seen in <em>Au. afarensis.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">None with direct evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table14-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table14-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A 2015 study noted that the trabecular bone morphology of the hand was consistent with forceful tool manufacture and use, suggesting potential early tool abilities.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus garhi<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">2.5 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Middle Awash (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">450 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Larger hind dentition than seen in other gracile Australopithecines.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A femur of a fragmentary partial skeleton, argued to belong to <em>Au. garhi<\/em>, indicates this species may be longer-limbed than <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>, although still able to move arboreally.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Crude stone tools resembling Oldowan (described later) have been found in association with <em>Au. garhi<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table15-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table15-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">This species is not well documented or understood and is based on only a few fossil specimens.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Paranthropus aethiopicus<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">2.7 mya to 2.3 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">West Turkana (Kenya); Laetoli (Tanzania); Omo River Basin (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The \u201cBlack Skull\u201d (KNM\u2013WT 17000) (discovery 1985).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain Size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">410 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>P. aethiopicus<\/em> has the shared derived traits of large flat premolars and molars, although few teeth have been found.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Large flaring zygomatic arches for accommodating large chewing muscles (the temporalis muscle), a sagittal crest for increased muscle attachment of the chewing muscles to the skull, and a robust mandible and supraorbital torus (brow ridge).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A proximal tibia indicates bipedality and similar size to <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table16-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table16-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 1.5pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">The \u201cBlack Skull\u201d is so called because of the mineral manganese that stained it black during fossilization.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Paranthropus boisei<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">2.4 mya to 1.4 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Koobi Fora, West Turkana, and Chesowanja (Kenya); Malema-Chiwondo (Malawi), Olduvai Gorge and Peninj (Tanzania); and Omo River basin and Konso (Ethiopia)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">\u201cZinj,\u201d or sometimes \u201cNutcracker Man\u201d (OH5), in 1959 by Mary Leakey. The Peninj mandible from Tanzania, found in 1964 by Kimoya Kimeu.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">500 cc to 550 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Very large, flat posterior dentition (largest of all hominins currently known). Much smaller anterior dentition. Very thick dental enamel.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Indications of very large chewing muscles (e.g., flaring zygomatic arches and a large sagittal crest).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Evidence for high variability and sexual dimorphism, with estimates of males at 1.37 meters tall and females at 1.24 meters.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Richard Leakey and Bernard Wood have both suggested that<em> P. boisei<\/em> could have made and used stone tools. Tools dated to 2.5 mya in Ethiopia have been argued to possibly belong to this species.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table17-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table17-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Despite the cranial features of <em>P. boisei<\/em> indicating a tough diet of tubers, nuts, and seeds, isotopes indicate a diet high in C4 foods (e.g., grasses, such as sedges). This differs from what is seen in<em> P. robustus<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Australopithecus sediba<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">1.97 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Malapa Fossil Site (South Africa)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Karabo (MH1) (discovery in 2008)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain size<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">420 cc to 450 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Small dentition with Australopithecine cusp-spacing.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Small brain size (<em>Australopithecus<\/em>-like) but gracile mandible (<em>Homo<\/em>-like).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Scientists have interpreted this mixture of traits (such as a robust ankle but evidence for an arch in the foot) as a transitional phase between a body previously adapted to arborealism (tree climbing, particularly in evidence from the bones of the wrist) to one that adapted to bipedal ground walking.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">None of direct association, but some have argued that a modern hand morphology (shorter fingers and a longer thumb) means that adaptations to tool manufacture and use may be present in this species.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table18-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table18-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">It was first discovered through a clavicle bone in 2008 by nine-year-old Matthew Berger, son of paleoanthropologist Lee Berger.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left\">\n<table style=\"width: 450pt\">\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>Paranthropus robustus<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dates<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">2.3 mya to 1 mya<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Region(s)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kromdraai B, Swartkrans, Gondolin, Drimolen, and Coopers Cave (South Africa)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Famous discoveries<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">SK48 (original skull)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Brain <\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>ize<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">410 cc to 530 cc<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dentition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Large posterior teeth with thick enamel, consistent with other Robust Australopithecines. Enamel hypoplasia is also common in this species, possibly because of instability in the development of large, thick enameled dentition.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><em>P. robustus<\/em> features are neither as \u201chyper-robust\u201d as <em>P. boisei<\/em> or as ancestral in features as <em>P. aethiopicus<\/em>. They have been described as less derived, more general features that are shared with both East African species (e.g., the sagittal crest and zygomatic flaring).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranial features<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Reconstructions indicate sexual dimorphism.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">N\/A<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"Table19-R\" style=\"height: 0\">\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Other<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td class=\"Table19-C\" style=\"background-color: transparent;padding: 5pt 5pt 5pt 5pt;border: solid #000000 1pt\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;color: #ffffff;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Several of these fossils are fragmentary in nature, distorted, and not well preserved, because they have been recovered from quarry breccia using explosives.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">Review Questions<br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">What is the difference between a \u201cderived\u201d versus an \u201cancestral\u201d trait? Give an example of both, seen in <em>Au. afarensis<\/em>.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Which of the paleoenvironment hypotheses have been used to describe early hominin diversity, and which have been used to describe bipedalism?<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Which anatomical features for bipedalism do we see in early hominins?<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Describe the dentition of gracile and robust australopithecines. What might these tell us about their diets?<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">List the hominin species argued to be associated with stone tool technologies. Are you convinced of these associations? Why\/why not?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000\">Key Terms<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Arboreal:<\/strong> Related to trees or woodland.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Aridification:<\/strong> Becoming increasingly arid or dry, as related to the climate or environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Aridity Hypothesis:<\/strong> The hypothesis that long-term aridification and expansion of savannah biomes were drivers in diversification in early hominin evolution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Assemblage:<\/strong> A collection demonstrating a pattern. Often pertaining to a site or region.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Bipedalism:<\/strong> The locomotor ability to walk on two legs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Breccia:<\/strong> Hard, calcareous sedimentary rock.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Canines:<\/strong> The pointy teeth just next to the incisors, in the front of the mouth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cheek teeth:<\/strong> Or hind dentition (molars and premolars).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Chronospecies:<\/strong> Species that are said to evolve into another species, in a linear fashion, over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Clade:<\/strong> A group of species or taxa with a shared common ancestor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cladistics:<\/strong> The field of grouping organisms into those with shared ancestry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Context:<\/strong> As pertaining to palaeoanthropology, this term refers to the place where an artifact or fossil is found.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cores:<\/strong> The remains of a rock that has been flaked or knapped.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Cusps:<\/strong> The ridges or \u201cbumps\u201d on the teeth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Dental formula:<\/strong> A technique to describe the number of incisors, canines, premolars, and molars in each quadrant of the mouth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Derived traits:<\/strong> Newly evolved traits that differ from those seen in the ancestor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Diastema:<\/strong> A tooth gap between the incisors and canines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Early Stone Age (ESA):<\/strong> The earliest-described archaeological period in which we start seeing stone-tool technology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>East African Rift System (EARS):<\/strong> This term is often used to refer to the Rift Valley, expanding from Malawi to Ethiopia. This active geological structure is responsible for much of the visibility of the paleoanthropological record in East Africa.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Enamel:<\/strong> The highly mineralized outer layer of the tooth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Encephalization:<\/strong> Expansion of the brain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Extant:<\/strong> Currently living\u2014i.e., not extinct.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Fallback foods:<\/strong> Foods that may not be preferred by an animal (e.g., foods that are not nutritionally dense) but that are essential for survival in times of stress or scarcity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Fauna:<\/strong> The animals of a particular region, habitat, or geological period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Faunal assemblages:<\/strong> Collections of fossils of the animals found at a site.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Faunal turnover:<\/strong> The rate at which species go extinct and are replaced with new species.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Flake:<\/strong> The piece knocked off of a stone core during the manufacture of a tool, which may be used as a stone tool.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Flora:<\/strong> The plants of a particular region, habitat, or geological period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Folivorous:<\/strong> Foliage-eating.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Foramen magnum:<\/strong> The large hole (foramen) at the base of the cranium, through which the spinal cord enters the skull.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Fossil:<\/strong> The remains or impression of an organism from the past.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Frugivorous:<\/strong> Fruit-eating.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Generalist:<\/strong> A species that can thrive in a wide variety of habitats and can have a varied diet.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Glacial:<\/strong> Colder, drier periods during an ice age when there is more ice trapped at the poles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Gracile:<\/strong> Slender, less rugged, or pronounced features.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hallux:<\/strong> The big toe.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Holotype:<\/strong> A single specimen from which a species or taxon is described or named.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hominin:<\/strong> A primate category that includes humans and our fossil relatives since our divergence from extant great apes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Honing P3:<\/strong> The mandibular premolar alongside the canine (in primates, the P3), which is angled to give space for (and sharpen) the upper canines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hyper-robust:<\/strong> Even more robust than considered normal in the Paranthropus genus.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Hypodigm:<\/strong> A sample (here, fossil) from which researchers extrapolate features of a population.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Incisiform:<\/strong> An adjective referring to a canine that appears more incisor-like in morphology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Incisors:<\/strong> The teeth in the front of the mouth, used to bite off food.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Interglacial:<\/strong> A period of milder climate in between two glacial periods.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Isotopes:<\/strong> Two or more forms of the same element that contain equal numbers of protons but different numbers of neutrons, giving them the same chemical properties but different atomic masses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Knappers:<\/strong> The people who fractured rocks in order to manufacture tools.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Knapping:<\/strong> The fracturing of rocks for the manufacture of tools.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Large Cutting Tool (LCT):<\/strong> A tool that is shaped to have functional edges.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Last Common Ancestor (LCA):<\/strong> The hypothetical final ancestor (or ancestral population) of two or more taxa before their divergence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Lithic:<\/strong> Relating to stone (here to stone tools).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Lumbar lordosis:<\/strong> The inward curving of the lower (lumbar) parts of the spine. The lower curve in the human S-shaped spine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Lumpers:<\/strong> Researchers who prefer to lump variable specimens into a single species or taxon and who feel high levels of variation is biologically real.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Megadont:<\/strong> An organism with extremely large dentition compared with body size.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Metacarpals:<\/strong> The long bones of the hand that connect to the phalanges (finger bones).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Molars:<\/strong> The largest, most posterior of the hind dentition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Monophyletic:<\/strong> A taxon or group of taxa descended from a common ancestor that is not shared with another taxon or group.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Morphology:<\/strong> The study of the form or size and shape of things; in this case, skeletal parts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Mosaic evolution:<\/strong> The concept that evolutionary change does not occur homogeneously throughout the body in organisms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Obligate bipedalism:<\/strong> Where the primary form of locomotion for an organism is bipedal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Occlude:<\/strong> When the teeth from the maxilla come into contact with the teeth in the mandible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Oldowan:<\/strong> Lower Paleolithic, the earliest stone tool culture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Orthognathic:<\/strong> The face below the eyes is relatively flat and does not jut out anteriorly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Paleoanthropologists:<\/strong> Researchers that study human evolution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Paleoenvironment:<\/strong> An environment from a period in the Earth\u2019s geological past.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Parabolic:<\/strong> Like a parabola (parabola-shaped).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Phalanges:<\/strong> Long bones in the hand and fingers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Phylogenetics:<\/strong> The study of phylogeny.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Phylogeny:<\/strong> The study of the evolutionary relationships between groups of organisms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Pliocene:<\/strong> A geological epoch between the Miocene and Pleistocene.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Polytypic:<\/strong> In reference to taxonomy, having two or more group variants capable of interacting and breeding biologically but having morphological population differences.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Postcranium:<\/strong> The skeleton below the cranium (head).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Premolars:<\/strong> The smallest of the hind teeth, behind the canines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Procumbent:<\/strong> In reference to incisors, tilting forward.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Prognathic:<\/strong> In reference to the face, the area below the eyes juts anteriorly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Quaternary Ice Age:<\/strong> The most recent geological time period, which includes the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs and which is defined by the cyclicity of increasing and decreasing ice sheets at the poles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Relative dating:<\/strong> Dating techniques that refer to a temporal sequence (i.e., older or younger than others in the reference) and do not estimate actual or absolute dates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Robust:<\/strong> Rugged or exaggerated features.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Site:<\/strong> A place in which evidence of past societies\/species\/activities may be observed through archaeological or paleontological practice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Specialist:<\/strong> A specialist species can thrive only in a narrow range of environmental conditions or has a limited diet.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Splitters:<\/strong> Researchers who prefer to split a highly variable taxon into multiple groups or species.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Taxa:<\/strong> Plural of taxon, a taxonomic group such as species, genus, or family.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Taxonomy:<\/strong> The science of grouping and classifying organisms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Techno-complex:<\/strong> A term encompassing multiple assemblages that share similar traits in terms of artifact production and morphology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Thermoregulation:<\/strong> Maintaining body temperature through physiologically cooling or warming the body.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Ungulates:<\/strong> Hoofed mammals\u2014e.g., cows and kudu.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Volcanic tufts:<\/strong> Rock made from ash from volcanic eruptions in the past.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>Valgus knee:<\/strong> The angle of the knee between the femur and tibia, which allows for weight distribution to be angled closer to the point above the center of gravity (i.e., between the feet) in bipeds.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000\">For Further Exploration<br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/humanorigins.si.edu\/evidence\">The Smithsonian Institution website<\/a> hosts descriptions of fossil species, an interactive timeline, and much more.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.maropeng.co.za\/content\/page\/human-evolution\">The Maropeng Museum website<\/a> hosts a wealth of information regarding South African Fossil Bearing sites in the Cradle of Humankind<strong>.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/perot-museum.imgix.net\/2019-08-naledi-sediba-quick-comparison.pdf\">This quick comparison between <em>Homo naledi<\/em> and <em>Australopithecus sediba<\/em><\/a> from the Perot Museum.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/s\/l1d2hv42psj21y9\/Braided%20Stream-1920.mp4?dl=0\">This explanation of the braided stream<\/a> by the Perot Museum.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hetmp.com\/\">A collation of 3-D files for visualizing<\/a> (or even 3-D printing) for homes, schools, and universities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbslearningmedia.org\/resource\/tdc02.sci.life.evo.lp_humanevo\/human-evolution.\">PBS learning materials<\/a>, including videos and diagrams of the Laetoli footprints, bipedalism, and fossils.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">A wealth of <a href=\"https:\/\/australianmuseum.net.au\/learn\/science\/human-evolution\/\">information from the Australian Museum website<\/a>, including species descriptions, family trees, and explanations of bipedalism and diet<strong>.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><strong>References<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Alemseged, Zeresenay, Fred Spoor, William H. Kimbel, Ren\u00e9 Bobe, Denis Geraads, Denn\u00e9 Reed, and Jonathan G. Wynn. 2006. \u201cA Juvenile Early Hominin Skeleton from Dikika, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 443 (7109): 296\u2013301.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Asfaw, Berhane, Tim White, Owen Lovejoy, Bruce Latimer, Scott Simpson, and Gen Suwa. 1999. \u201c<em>Australopithecus garhi<\/em>: A New Species of Early Hominid from Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 284 (5414): 629\u2013635.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Behrensmeyer, Anna K., Nancy E. Todd, Richard Potts, and Geraldine E. McBrinn. 1997. \u201cLate Pliocene Faunal Turnover in the Turkana Basin, Kenya, and Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 278 (5343): 637\u2013640.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Berger, Lee R., Darryl J. De Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Kristian J. Carlson, Paul HGM Dirks, and Job M. Kibii. 2010. \u201c<em>Australopithecus sediba<\/em>: A New Species of <em>Homo<\/em>-like Australopith from South Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 328 (5975): 195\u2013204.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Bobe, Ren\u00e9, and Anna K. Behrensmeyer. 2004. \u201cThe Expansion of Grassland Ecosystems in Africa in Relation to Mammalian Evolution and the Origin of the Genus <em>Homo<\/em>.\u201d <em>Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology<\/em> 207 (3\u20134): 399\u2013420.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Brain, C. K. 1967. \u201cThe Transvaal Museum's Fossil Project at Swartkrans.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 63 (9): 378\u2013384.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Broom, R. 1938a. \u201cMore Discoveries of Australopithecus.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 141 (1): 828\u2013829.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Broom, R. 1938b. \u201cThe Pleistocene Anthropoid Apes of South Africa.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 142 (3591): 377\u2013379.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Broom, R. 1947. \u201cDiscovery of a New Skull of the South African Ape-Man, Plesianthropus.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 159 (4046): 672.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Broom, R. 1950. \u201cThe Genera and Species of the South African Fossil Ape-Man.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 8 (1): 1\u201314.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Brunet, Michel, Alain Beauvilain, Yves Coppens, Emile Heintz, Aladji HE Moutaye, and David Pilbeam. 1995. \u201cThe First Australopithecine 2,500 Kilometers West of the Rift Valley (Chad).\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 378 (6554): 275\u2013273.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Cer\u00edaco, L. M. (2012). Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. <em>Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine<\/em>, <em>8<\/em>(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1746-4269-8-8 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Cerling, Thure E., Jonathan G. Wynn, Samuel A. Andanje, Michael I. Bird, David Kimutai Korir, Naomi E. Levin, William Mace, Anthony N. Macharia, Jay Quade, and Christopher H. Remien. 2011. \u201cWoody Cover and Hominin Environments in the Past 6 Million Years.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 476, no. 7358 (2011): 51-56..<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Clarke, Ronald J. 1998. \u201cFirst Ever Discovery of a Well-Preserved Skull and Associated Skeleton of <em>Australopithecus<\/em>.\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 94 (10): 460\u2013463.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Clarke, Ronald J. 2013. \u201cAustralopithecus from Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa.\u201d In <em>The Paleobiology of Australopithecus<\/em>, edited by K. E. Reed, J. G. Fleagle, and R. E. Leakey, 105\u2013123. Netherlands: Springer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Clarke, Ronald J., and Kathleen Kuman. 2019. \u201cThe Skull of StW 573, a 3.67 Ma Australopithecus Prometheus Skeleton from Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa.\u201d <em>Journal of <\/em><em>H<\/em><em>uman <\/em><em>E<\/em><em>volution<\/em> 134: 102634.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Clarke, R. J., and P. V. Tobias. 1995. \u201cSterkfontein Member 2 Foot Bones of the Oldest South African Hominid.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 269 (5223): 521\u2013524.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Constantino, P. J., and B. A. Wood. 2004. \u201cParanthropus Paleobiology\u201d. In <em>Miscelanea en <\/em><em>Homenae<\/em><em> a Emiliano Aguirre<\/em><em>,<\/em> <em>v<\/em><em>olumen III: Paleoantropologia<\/em>, edited by E. G. P\u00e9rez and S. R. Jara, 136\u2013151. Alcal\u00e1 de Henares: Museo Arqueologico Regional.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Constantino, P. J., and B. A. Wood. 2007. \u201cThe Evolution of Zinjanthropus boisei.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology: <\/em><em>Issues, News, and Reviews<\/em> 16 (2): 49\u201362.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Dart, Raymond A. 1925. \u201cAustralopithecus africanus, the Man-Ape of South Africa.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 115: 195\u2013199.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Darwin, Charles. 1871. <em>The Descent of Man: And Selection in Relation to Sex<\/em>. London: J. Murray.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Daver, Guillaume, F. Guy, Hassane Ta\u00efsso Mackaye, Andossa Likius, J-R. Boisserie, Abderamane Moussa, Laurent Pallas, Patrick Vignaud, and N\u00e9koulnang D. Clarisse. 2022. \"Postcranial Evidence of Late Miocene Hominin Bipedalism in Chad.\" <em>Nature<\/em> 609 (7925): 94\u2013100.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Heinzelin, Jean de, J. Desmond Clark, Tim White, William Hart, Paul Renne, Giday WoldeGabriel, Yonas Beyene, and Elisabeth Vrba. 1999. \u201cEnvironment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 284 (5414): 625\u2013629.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">DeMenocal, Peter B. D. 2004. \u201cAfrican Climate Change and Faunal Evolution during the Pliocene\u2013Pleistocene.\u201d <em>Earth and Planetary Science Letters<\/em> 220 (1\u20132): 3\u201324.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">DeMenocal, Peter B. D. and J. Bloemendal, J. 1995. \u201cPlio-Pleistocene Climatic Variability in Subtropical Africa and the Paleoenvironment of Hominid Evolution: A Combined Data-Model Approach.\u201d In <em>Paleoclimate and Evolution, with Emphasis on Human Origins<\/em>, edited by E. S. Vrba, G. H. Denton, T. C. Partridge, and L. H. Burckle, 262\u2013288. New Haven: Yale University Press.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Dirks, Paul HGM, Job M. Kibii, Brian F. Kuhn, Christine Steininger, Steven E. Churchill, Jan D. Kramers, Robyn Pickering, Daniel L. Farber, Anne-Sophie M\u00e9riaux, Andy I. R. Herries, Geoffrey C. P. King, And Lee R. Berger. 2010. \u201cGeological Setting and Age of <em>Australopithecus sediba<\/em> from Southern Africa.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 328 (5975): 205\u2013208.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Faith, J. Tyler, and Anna K. Behrensmeyer. 2013. \u201cClimate Change and Faunal Turnover: Testing the Mechanics of the Turnover-Pulse Hypothesis with South African Fossil Data.\u201d <em>Paleobiology<\/em> 39 (4): 609\u2013627.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Greene, H. W. (2017). <em>Primates And Snakes: 75 Million Years of Deadly Dialogue?<\/em> Cornell Lab Seminar Series. Cornell University. <a style=\"color: #000000;text-decoration: underline\" href=\"https:\/\/academy.allaboutbirds.org\/live-event\/primates%20and-snakes-75-million-years-of-deadly-dialogue\/\">https:\/\/academy.allaboutbirds.org\/live-event\/primates%20and-snakes-75-million-years-of-deadly-dialogue\/<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Grine, Frederick E. 1988. \u201cNew Craniodental Fossils of <em>Paranthropus<\/em> from the Swartkrans Formation and Their Significance in \u2018Robust\u2019 Australopithecine Evolution.\u201d In <em>Evolutionary History of the \u201cRobust\u201d Australopithecines<\/em>, edited by F. E. Grine, 223\u2013243. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Grine, Frederick E., Carrie S. Mongle, John G. Fleagle, and Ashley S. Hammond. 2022. \"The Taxonomic Attribution of African Hominin Postcrania from the Miocene through the Pleistocene: Associations and Assumptions.\" <em>Journal of Human Evolution<\/em> 173: 103255.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Haile-Selassie, Yohannes, Luis Gibert, Stephanie M. Melillo, Timothy M. Ryan, Mulugeta Alene, Alan Deino, Naomi E. Levin, Gary Scott, and Beverly Z. Saylor. 2015. \u201cNew Species from Ethiopia Further Expands Middle Pliocene Hominin Diversity.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 521 (7553): 432\u2013433.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Haile-Selassie, Yohannes, Stephanie M. Melillo, Antonino Vazzana, Stefano Benazzi, and Timothy M. Ryan. 2019. \u201cA 3.8-Million-Year-Old Hominin Cranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 573 (7773): 214-219.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Harmand, Sonia, Jason E. Lewis, Craig S. Feibel, Christopher J. Lepre, Sandrine Prat, Arnaud Lenoble, Xavier Bo\u00ebs et al. 2015. \u201c3.3-Million-Year-Old Stone Tools from Lomekwi3, West Turkana, Kenya.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 521 (7552): 310\u2013316.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hay, Richard L. 1990. \u201cOlduvai Gorge: A Case History in the Interpretation of Hominid Paleoenvironments.\u201d In <em>East Africa: Establishment of a Geologic Framework for Paleoanthropology<\/em>, edited by L. Laporte, 23\u201337<em>.<\/em> Boulder: Geological Society of America.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hay, Richard L., and Mary D. Leakey. 1982. \u201cThe Fossil Footprints of Laetoli.\u201d <em>Scientific American<\/em> 246 (2): 50\u201357.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hlazo, Nomawethu. 2015. \u201cParanthropus: Variation in Cranial Morphology.\u201d Honours thesis, Archaeology Department, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Hlazo, Nomawethu. 2018. \u201cVariation and the Evolutionary Drivers of Diversity in the Genus <em>Paranthropus<\/em>.\u201d Master\u2019s thesis, Archaeology Department, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000\">Isbell, L. A. (2009). <em>The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent: Why We See So Well<\/em>. Harvard University Press. <a style=\"color: #000000\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctvjnrvj0\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/j.ctvjnrvj0<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Johanson, D. C., T. D. White, and Y. Coppens. 1978. \u201cA New Species of the Genus <em>Australopithecus<\/em> (Primates: Hominidae) from the Pliocene of East Africa.\u201d <em>Kirtlandia<\/em> 28: 1\u201314.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kimbel, William H. 2015. \u201cThe Species and Diversity of Australopiths.\u201d In <em>Handbook of Paleoanthropology<\/em>, 2nd ed., edited by T. Hardt, 2071\u20132105. Berlin: Springer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kimbel, William H., and Lucas K. Delezene. 2009. \u201c\u2018Lucy\u2019 Redux: A Review of Research on <em>Australopithecus afarensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>American <\/em><em>J<\/em><em>ournal of <\/em><em>P<\/em><em>hysical <\/em><em>A<\/em><em>nthropology<\/em> 140 (S49): 2\u201348.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kingston, John D. 2007. \u201cShifting Adaptive Landscapes: Progress and Challenges in Reconstructing Early Hominid Environments.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 134 (S45): 20\u201358.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Kingston, John D., and Terry Harrison. 2007. \u201cIsotopic Dietary Reconstructions of Pliocene Herbivores at Laetoli: Implications for Early Hominin Paleoecology.\u201d <em>Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology<\/em> 243 (3\u20134): 272\u2013306.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Leakey, Louis S. B. 1959. \u201cA New Fossil Skull from Olduvai.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 184 (4685): 491\u2013493.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Leakey, Mary 1971. <em>Olduvai Gorge<\/em>, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Leakey, Mary D., and Richard L. Hay. 1979. \u201cPliocene Footprints in the Laetoli Beds at Laetoli, Northern Tanzania.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 278 (5702): 317\u2013323.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Leakey, Meave G., Craig S. Feibel, Ian McDougall, and Alan Walker. 1995. \u201cNew Four\u2013Million-Year-Old Hominid Species from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 376 (6541): 565\u2013571.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Meave G., Fred Spoor, Frank H. Brown, Patrick N. Gathogo, Christopher Kiarie, Louise N. Leakey, and Ian McDougall. 2001. \u201cNew Hominin Genus from Eastern Africa Shows Diverse Middle Pliocene Lineages.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 410 (6827): 433\u2013440.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lebatard, Anne-Elisabeth, Didier L. Bourl\u00e8s, Philippe Duringer, Marc Jolivet, R\u00e9gis Braucher, Julien Carcaillet, Mathieu Schuster et al. 2008. \u201cCosmogenic Nuclide Dating of <em>Sahelanthropus tchadensis<\/em> and <em>Australopithecus bahrelghazali<\/em>: Mio-Pliocene Hominids from Chad.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 105 (9): 3226\u20133231.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lee-Thorp, Julia. 2011. \u201cThe Demise of \u2018Nutcracker Man.\u2019\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 108 (23): 9319\u20139320.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Lombard, Marlize, L. Y. N. Wadley, Janette Deacon, Sarah Wurz, Isabelle Parsons, Moleboheng Mohapi, Joane Swart, and Peter Mitchell. 2012. \u201cSouth African and Lesotho Stone Age Sequence Updated.\u201d <em>The South African Archaeological Bulletin<\/em> 67 (195): 123\u2013144.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Maslin, Mark A., Chris M. Brierley, Alice M. Milner, Susanne Shultz, Martin H. Trauth, and Katy E. Wilson. 2014. \u201cEast African Climate Pulses and Early Human Evolution.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 101: 1\u201317.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">McHenry, Henry M. 2009. \u201cHuman Evolution.\u201d In <em>Evolution: The First Four Billion Years<\/em>, edited by M. Ruse and J. Travis, 256\u2013280. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press..<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Patterson, Bryan, and William W. Howells. 1967. \u201cHominid Humeral Fragment from Early Pleistocene of Northwestern Kenya.\u201d <em>Science<\/em> 156 (3771): 64\u201366.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Pickering, Robyn, and Jan D. Kramers. 2010. \u201cRe-appraisal of the Stratigraphy and Determination of New U-Pb Dates for the Sterkfontein Hominin Site.\u201d <em>Journal of Human Evoluti<\/em><em>on<\/em> 59 (1): 70\u201386.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Potts, Richard. 1998. \u201cEnvironmental Hypotheses of Hominin Evolution.\u201d <em>American Journal of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 107 (S27): 93\u2013136.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Potts, Richard. 2013. \u201cHominin Evolution in Settings of Strong Environmental Variability.\u201d <em>Quaternary Science Reviews<\/em> 73: 1\u201313.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Rak, Yoel. 1983. <em>The <\/em><em>A<\/em><em>ustralopithecine <\/em><em>F<\/em><em>ace<\/em>. New York: Academic Press.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Rak, Yoel. 1988. \u201cOn Variation in the Masticatory System of <em>Australopithecus boisei<\/em>.\u201d In <em>Evolutionary History of the \u201cRobust\u201d Australopithecines<\/em>, edited by M. Ruse and J. Travis, 193\u2013198<em>.<\/em> New York: Aldine de Gruyter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Semaw, Sileshi. 2000. \u201cThe World\u2019s Oldest Stone Artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their Implications for Understanding Stone Technology and Patterns of Human Evolution between 2.6 Million Years Ago and 1.5 Million Years Ago.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em> 27(12): 1197\u20131214.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Shipman, Pat. 2002. <em>The Man Who Found the Missing Link: Eug<\/em><em>e<\/em><em>ne Dubois and <\/em><em>h<\/em><em>is Lifelong Quest to Prove Darwin Right<\/em>. New York: Simon &amp; Schuster.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Spoor, Fred. 2015. \u201cPalaeoanthropology: The Middle Pliocene Gets Crowded.\u201d<em> Nature<\/em> 521 (7553): 432\u2013433.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Strait, David S., Frederick E. Grine, and Marc A. Moniz. 1997. A Reappraisal of Early Hominid Phylogeny.\u201d <em>Journal of <\/em><em>H<\/em><em>uman <\/em><em>E<\/em><em>volution<\/em> 32 (1): 17\u201382.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Thackeray, J. Francis. 2000. \u201c\u2018Mrs. Ples\u2019 from Sterkfontein: Small Male or Large Female?\u201d <em>The South African Archaeological <\/em><em>Bulletin<\/em> 55: 155\u2013158.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Thackeray, J. Francis, Jos\u00e9 Braga, Jacques Treil, N. Niksch, and J. H. Labuschagne. 2002. \u201c\u2018Mrs. Ples\u2019 (Sts 5) from Sterkfontein: An Adolescent Male?\u201d <em>South African Journal of Science<\/em> 98 (1\u20132): 21\u201322.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Toth, Nicholas. 1985. \u201cThe Oldowan Reassessed.\u201d <em>Journal of Archaeological Science<\/em>\u00a012 (2): 101\u2013120.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Van Le, Q., Isbell, L. A., Matsumoto, J., Nguyen, M., Hori, E., Maior, R. S., Tomaz, C., Tran, A. H., Ono, T., &amp; Nishijo, H. (2013). Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110<\/em>(47), 19000\u201319005.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Vrba, E. S. 1988. \u201cLate Pliocene Climatic Events and Hominid Evolution.\u201d In <em>The <\/em><em>E<\/em><em>volutionary <\/em><em>H<\/em><em>istory of the <\/em><em>R<\/em><em>obust Australopithecines<\/em>, edited by F. E. Grine, 405\u2013426. New York: Aldine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Vrba, Elisabeth S. 1998. \u201cMultiphasic Growth Models and the Evolution of Prolonged Growth Exemplified by Human Brain Evolution.\u201d <em>Journal of Theoretical Biology<\/em> 190 (3): 227\u2013239.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Vrba, Elisabeth S. 2000. \u201cMajor Features of Neogene Mammalian Evolution in Africa.\u201d In <em>Cenozoic <\/em><em>G<\/em><em>eology of <\/em><em>S<\/em><em>outhern Africa<\/em>, edited by T. C. Partridge and R. Maud, 277\u2013304<em>.<\/em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Walker, Alan C., and Richard E. Leakey. 1988. \u201cThe Evolution of <em>Australopithecus boisei<\/em>.\u201d In <em>Evolutionary History of the \u201cRobust\u201d Australopithecines<\/em>, edited by F. E. Grine, 247\u2013258. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Walker, Alan, Richard E. Leakey, John M. Harris, and Francis H. Brown. 1986. \u201c2.5-my <em>Australopithecus boisei<\/em> from West of Lake Turkana, Kenya.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 322 (6079): 517\u2013522.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Ward, Carol, Meave Leakey, and Alan Walker. 1999. \u201cThe New Hominid Species <em>Australopithecus anamensis<\/em>.\u201d <em>Evolutionary Anthropology<\/em> 7 (6): 197\u2013205.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">White, Tim D. 1988. \u201cThe Comparative Biology of \u2018Robust\u2019 Australopithecus: Clues from Content.\u201d In <em>Evolutionary History of the \u201cRobust\u201d Australopithecines<\/em>, edited by F. E. Grine, 449\u2013483. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">White, Tim D., Gen Suwa, and Berhane Asfaw. 1994. \u201c<em>Australopithecus ramidus<\/em>, a New Species of Early Hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em> 371 (6495): 306\u2013312.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Wood, Bernard. 2010. \u201cReconstructing Human Evolution: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities.\u201d <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> 10 (2): 8902\u20138909.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Wood, Bernard, and Eve K. Boyle. 2016. \u201cHominin Taxic Diversity: Fact or Fantasy?\u201d <em>Yearbook of Physical Anthropology<\/em> 159 (S61): 37\u201378.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Wood, Bernard, and Kes Schroer. 2017. \u201cParanthropus: Where Do Things Stand?\u201d In <em>Human Paleontology and Prehistory<\/em>, edited by A. Marom and E. Hovers, 95\u2013107. New York: Springer, Cham.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"import-Normal\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">Acknowledgements<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: transparent;text-align: left;margin-left: 0pt;margin-right: 0pt;text-indent: 0pt\"><span style=\"color: #000000\">All of the authors in this section are students and early career researchers in paleoanthropology and related fields in South Africa (or at least have worked in South Africa). We wish to thank everyone who supports young and diverse talent in this field and would love to further acknowledge Black, African, and female academics who have helped pave the way for us.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1046\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1046\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The process by which messenger RNA codons are read and amino acids are \u201cchained together\u201d to form proteins.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1048\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1048\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>RNA molecule that is transcribed from DNA. Its tri-nucleotide codons are \u201cread\u201d by a ribosome to build a protein.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1050\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1050\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Segment of DNA that contains protein-coding information and various regulatory (e.g., promoter) and noncoding (e.g., introns) regions.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1052\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1052\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Segment of DNA that does not code for proteins.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1054\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1054\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>An organelle in the cell found in the cytoplasm or endoplasmic reticulum. It is responsible for reading mRNA and protein assemblage.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1056\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1056\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>RNA molecule involved in translation. Transfer RNA transports amino acids from the cell\u2019s cytoplasm to a ribosome.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1058\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1058\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The physical appearance of a given trait.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1060\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1060\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A nonidentical DNA sequence found in the same gene location on a homologous chromosome, or gene copy, that codes for the same trait but produces a different phenotype.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1062\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1062\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Genotype that consists of two identical alleles.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1064\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1064\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Refers to an allele whose effect is not normally seen unless two copies are present in an individual\u2019s genotype.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1066\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1066\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Immune-related proteins that can detect and bind to foreign substances in the blood such as pathogens.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1068\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1068\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A diagram of family relationships that indicates which members may have or carry certain genetic and\/or phenotypic traits.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1070\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1070\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Refers to a pattern of inheritance in which an allele is located on an autosome (non sex chromosome).<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1072\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1072\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A genetic mutation (i.e., allele) that has a harmful phenotypic disease-causing  effect.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1074\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1074\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The proportion of how often the possession of an allele results in an expected phenotype. Some alleles are more penetrant than others.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1076\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1076\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A category of diseases that are polygenic and are also influenced by environment and lifestyle factors.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1078\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1078\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Changes in gene expression that do not result in a change of the underlying DNA sequence. These changes typically involve DNA methylation and histone modifications. These changes are reversible and can also be inherited by the next generation.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1080\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1080\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A molecular procedure that is performed to test for the presence of certain alleles or to discover new ones.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1082\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1082\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>he methylation pattern throughout a genome\u2014that is, which genes (and other genomic sites) are methylated and unmethylated.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1084\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1084\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A process that involves the usage of fluorescently labeled nucleotides to visualize DNA (PCR fragments) at the nucleotide level.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1086\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1086\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A genotyping technology that involves producing millions of nucleotide sequences (from a single DNA sample) that are then read with a sequencing machine. It can be used for analyzing entire genomes or specific regions and requires extensive program-based applications.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1088\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1088\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The anthropological practice of suspending judgment and seeking to understand another culture on its own terms sympathetically enough so that the culture appears to be a coherent and meaningful design for living.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1090\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1090\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The principle that the language you speak allows you to think about some things and not other things. This is also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1092\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1092\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>In this textbook, subfield refers to the different specializations within biological anthropology, including primatology, paleoanthropology, molecular anthropology, bioarchaeology, forensic anthropology, and human biology.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1094\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1094\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The ways in which human bodies, people, or cultures change, often in ways better suited to the environment or social context.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1096\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1096\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Explanation of observed facts; details how and why observed phenomena are the way they are. Scientific hypotheses rely on empirical evidence, are testable, and are able to be refuted.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1098\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1098\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>An explanation of observations that typically addresses a wide range of phenomena.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1100\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1100\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A unified way of knowing that is shared by a group of people and used to explain and predict phenomena.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1102\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1102\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>A firmly held opinion or conviction typically based on spiritual apprehension rather than empirical proof.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1104\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1104\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>James Hutton\u2019s theory that the world was much older than biblical explanations allowed. This age could be determined by gradual natural processes like soil erosion.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1106\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1106\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The theoretical perspective that the geologic processes observed today are the same as the processes operating in the past.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1108\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1108\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Billion years ago.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1110\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1110\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Geologic time units that span millions of years and are subdivided into epochs.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1112\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1112\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>Thousand years ago.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><template id=\"term_1678_1114\"><div class=\"glossary__definition\" role=\"dialog\" data-id=\"term_1678_1114\"><div tabindex=\"-1\"><p>The smallest units of geologic time, spanning thousands to millions of years.<\/p>\n<\/div><button><span aria-hidden=\"true\">&times;<\/span><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close definition<\/span><\/button><\/div><\/template><\/div>","protected":false},"author":96,"menu_order":14,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["karin-enstam-jaffe"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[90],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1678","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-karin-enstam-jaffe"],"part":20,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/96"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1678\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1778,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1678\/revisions\/1778"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/20"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1678\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1678"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1678"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opentextbooks.concordia.ca\/explorations3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}